25.01.2015 Views

stereo photogrammetry stereo photogrammetry - BAE Systems GXP ...

stereo photogrammetry stereo photogrammetry - BAE Systems GXP ...

stereo photogrammetry stereo photogrammetry - BAE Systems GXP ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Reprinted from<br />

© Earth Imaging Journal<br />

March/April 2005<br />

The International Air Transport Association<br />

is updating major international airport<br />

maps that don’t conform to current<br />

standards. Here an IKONOS satellite image<br />

of Madeira, Portugal, illustrates a typical<br />

training scenario. The red line indicates the<br />

optimal flight path that a pilot would use<br />

to avoid hitting any obstacles.<br />

Stereo Photogram<br />

Making 21st Century<br />

Air Transportation Safer<br />

Techniques rooted in the 1950s form the<br />

basis for modern airport analysis.<br />

By Carolyn Gordon, <strong>BAE</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> (www.socetgxp.com),<br />

San Diego, and Dejan Damjanovic, Space Imaging<br />

(www.spaceimaging.com), Denver.<br />

On April 3, 1996, in Dubrovnik, Croatia, a plane crash<br />

resulted in the deaths of U.S. Secretary of Commerce<br />

Ronald H. Brown and 33 other passengers and crew.<br />

The deadly accident was attributed to poor weather<br />

conditions, a lack of knowledge of the airfield environment<br />

and an off-course approach. As a result of the tragedy, Congress<br />

passed the Ron Brown Airfield Initiative in 2000 to improve<br />

airfield navigation information. Since then, using conventional<br />

land surveying techniques and modern digital <strong>photogrammetry</strong>,<br />

many airport operators are taking advantage of today’s geospatial<br />

and satellite sensor technology to ensure safer flight paths.<br />

Arrival and departure paths to and from airports must be kept<br />

free of significant man-made and natural obstacles, including trees,<br />

buildings and other features. The Federal Aviation Administration<br />

(FAA) defines the formal requirements in the United States, as does<br />

the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) for the rest<br />

of the world. In each case, the regulations define a virtual polygon<br />

centered around the ends of the runway, as well as a series<br />

of ever-larger polygons that must be kept free of any obstacle<br />

that an airplane could hit when flying in that space.<br />

As shown in the image at the top of page 38, these virtual<br />

polygons, or “surfaces,” are defined in 3-D space sloping up<br />

from the end and sides of each runway until reaching the edge<br />

of the surface. There are different surfaces for take-off, landing,<br />

landing on nonprecision instruments, landing on precision<br />

instruments and day/night operations. Prior to the Global<br />

Positioning System (GPS) satellite constellation, information<br />

regarding obstacles in the vicinity of each airport could only<br />

be collected by extensive ground survey, with some degree of<br />

validation possible with conventional <strong>stereo</strong> <strong>photogrammetry</strong>.<br />

© 2005 Earthwide Communications LLC, www.eijournal.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!