27.01.2015 Views

Reading 2009 - African American Communication and Collaboration ...

Reading 2009 - African American Communication and Collaboration ...

Reading 2009 - African American Communication and Collaboration ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

GRADE<br />

4<br />

Female students score<br />

higher than male<br />

students<br />

Female students scored 7 points higher<br />

on average than male students in <strong>2009</strong>,<br />

which was not significantly different from<br />

the score gaps in either 2007 or 1992<br />

(figure 7). Average reading scores for<br />

male <strong>and</strong> female students in <strong>2009</strong><br />

remained unchanged from 2007.<br />

Results by family income<br />

level show no significant<br />

change since 2007<br />

NAEP uses students’ eligibility for the<br />

National School Lunch Program as an<br />

indicator of low income. Students from<br />

lower-income families are eligible for either<br />

free or reduced-price school lunches, while<br />

students from higher-income families are<br />

not (see the Technical Notes for eligibility<br />

criteria).<br />

Students who were not eligible have<br />

typically scored higher on average than<br />

those eligible for reduced-price lunch, who<br />

in turn scored higher than those eligible for<br />

free lunch (figure 8). The scores for all<br />

three groups showed no significant change<br />

from 2007 to <strong>2009</strong> but remained higher<br />

than in 2003.<br />

Figure 7. Trend in fourth-grade NAEP reading average scores <strong>and</strong> score gaps, by gender<br />

Scale score<br />

500<br />

240<br />

230<br />

220<br />

210<br />

200<br />

190<br />

180<br />

0<br />

Figure 8. Trend in fourth-grade NAEP reading average scores, by<br />

eligibility for free or reduced-price school lunch<br />

Scale score<br />

500<br />

240<br />

230<br />

220<br />

210<br />

200<br />

190<br />

0<br />

221*<br />

213*<br />

229*<br />

220*<br />

209*<br />

8 10* 6 5 11* 6 7 6 7 7<br />

230*<br />

211* 212*<br />

199* 201*<br />

232<br />

215<br />

203<br />

232<br />

216<br />

204<br />

’03 ’05 ’07 ’09<br />

* Significantly different (p < .05) from <strong>2009</strong>.<br />

220* 217* 219*<br />

214* 212*<br />

208*<br />

’92 ’94 ’98 ’00 ’02 ’03 ’05 ’07<br />

Accommodations not permitted<br />

222* 222* 222*<br />

215* 215* 216*<br />

* Significantly different (p < .05) from <strong>2009</strong>.<br />

NOTE: Score gaps are calculated based on differences between unrounded average scores.<br />

NOT ELIGIBLE<br />

ELIGIBLE FOR REDUCED-PRICE LUNCH<br />

ELIGIBLE FOR FREE LUNCH<br />

Year<br />

224<br />

218<br />

224<br />

218<br />

’09<br />

Accommodations permitted<br />

FEMALE<br />

MALE<br />

SCORE GAP<br />

Year<br />

Table 3. Percentage of students assessed in fourth-grade NAEP<br />

reading, by eligibility for free or reduced-price school lunch:<br />

Various years, 2003–09<br />

Eligibility status 2003 2005 2007 <strong>2009</strong><br />

Eligible for free lunch 32* 34* 35* 38<br />

Eligible for reduced-price lunch 8* 7* 6 6<br />

Not eligible 50 50 52* 50<br />

Information not available 10* 8* 7 7<br />

* Significantly different (p < .05) from <strong>2009</strong>.<br />

NOTE: Detail may not sum to totals because of rounding.<br />

Some changes were seen since 2007 in the<br />

proportion of fourth-graders eligible for the<br />

National School Lunch Program. The percentage<br />

of fourth-graders eligible for free lunch increased<br />

from 35 percent in 2007 to 38 percent in <strong>2009</strong>,<br />

while the percentage of students who were<br />

not eligible decreased from 52 to 50 percent<br />

(table 3). There was no change in the percentage<br />

of students eligible for reduced-price lunch<br />

from 2007 to <strong>2009</strong>.<br />

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), various years, 1992–<strong>2009</strong> <strong>Reading</strong> Assessments.<br />

12 THE NATION’S REPORT CARD

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!