28.01.2015 Views

Vol 5 No. 2 July - December 2006 - Faculty of Law - National ...

Vol 5 No. 2 July - December 2006 - Faculty of Law - National ...

Vol 5 No. 2 July - December 2006 - Faculty of Law - National ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

victor y at the 4th annual oxford<br />

international intellectual<br />

property moot competition<br />

<strong>Law</strong><br />

School<br />

Highlights<br />

24<br />

CONTRIBUTED BY FELICIA TAN DIPSING ’06<br />

What would you say in your defence as a nonpr<strong>of</strong>iting<br />

website that slogged to shar e free news<br />

and r eviews <strong>of</strong> 1950s-60s music with fellow<br />

aficionados but now face lawsuits because you<br />

have per mitted fr ee downloads <strong>of</strong> such music in<br />

response to your users’ pleas On the other hand,<br />

from the perspective <strong>of</strong> the r ecording company and<br />

composers, it is the copyright owner’s right to<br />

decide how to r eact to the market and nobody , even<br />

with an altr uistic motive, can usurp that right.<br />

This is an exceedingly simplified fact-patter n for<br />

the 4th annual Oxfor d Inter national Intellectual<br />

Property Moot Competition (“OIPM”), held in Oxfor d<br />

University’s Oriel College on 1 & 2 April. As a twoperson<br />

team, Suegene Ang ’06 and I (Felicia T an<br />

DipSing ’06) had to constantly r ole-play both sides<br />

to brainstor m the r espective ar guments <strong>of</strong> the<br />

appellants and the r espondents in or der to prepare<br />

for the competition. What made the pr eparation<br />

process even mor e challenging was the fact that<br />

this was the <strong>National</strong> University <strong>of</strong> Singapor e <strong>Faculty</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong>’s debut in the OIPM, which meant no alumnus<br />

to shar e their advice. As such, we had to tr ouble<br />

fellow NUS mooters who wer e training for other<br />

competitions to spar e time fr om their alr eady<br />

tight training schedule to listen to our ar guments.<br />

The ride in Oxfor d itself was not all smooth-sailing.<br />

We worked with an extr emely tight schedule,<br />

mooting five times within two days, alter nating<br />

between both appellants and r espondents which<br />

made it r eally dif ficult to keep the ner ves together .<br />

<strong>No</strong>netheless, ever y minute <strong>of</strong> the experience<br />

since <strong>December</strong> was wor th it. Our enchanting coach,<br />

Associate Pr <strong>of</strong>essor Eleanor W ong ’85, was<br />

always ther e to give her unwavering suppor t<br />

and guidance. Both Suegene and I also worked<br />

superbly as we had the right chemistr y despite<br />

being vir tually strangers befor e. Fr om r esearch<br />

styles to an inexplicable craving for the full<br />

English br eakfast, we had astoundingly similar<br />

habits. W e also had dif ferent but complementar y<br />

speaking styles, making us a unique team.<br />

All in all, the challenges and dif ficulties fr om the preparation<br />

to the competition itself, made our final victor y over Oxfor d<br />

University par ticularly sweet, especially since we had<br />

narrowly lost to them in the pr eliminar y round. Mor eover,<br />

the final r ound was befor e a pr estigious panel <strong>of</strong> Lor d<br />

Justice Jacobs, Lor d Justice Mummer y and Justice Pumfr ey,<br />

all graduates fr om Oxfor d University. Lor d Justice Jacobs<br />

himself complimented us on our ability to think on our<br />

feet and for ward arguments as though they had just come<br />

to our minds; skills that marked tr ue advocates. W e also<br />

possessed the right blend <strong>of</strong> for mal cour troom manners,<br />

a casual friendliness with the right amount <strong>of</strong> guts to<br />

banter with judges when the questions wer e patently to<br />

be taken as jokes.<br />

For many, the gr eatest par t <strong>of</strong> the experience might be<br />

the moment <strong>of</strong> victor y but mine came earlier . During the<br />

judges’ deliberation, we wer e suddenly sur rounded by<br />

other par ticipating teams who congratulated us on our<br />

performance. I felt like a winner then when Asian and<br />

<strong>No</strong>n-Asian teams alike swor e that we should win and that<br />

if we did not the OIPM or ganisers must have conspir ed<br />

against us.<br />

When we wer e announced as the winners, the teams<br />

once again sur rounded us with congratulator y wor ds.<br />

They had to be asked to leave so that we could have a<br />

private moment with the 3 Lor d Justices and we felt<br />

extremely flatter ed and privileged. Ther eafter, the awar d<br />

dinner, post-dinner drinks, and even the following week<br />

where we rewarded ourselves by travelling in Eur ope flew<br />

by in the blink <strong>of</strong> an eye. That was r eally a testimony to<br />

our paramount joy which gave us the semblance that<br />

time had stopped then at the pinnacle <strong>of</strong> happiness.<br />

On a par ting note, our unfor gettable experience was not<br />

due to our victor y. Ever yone had a fine time, and we all<br />

made new friends and lear nt much fr om one another .<br />

I dare say that our friendly coach was definitely one <strong>of</strong><br />

the most popular non-competitors in Oxfor d as even other<br />

mooters asked for her opinion on their mooting! Though<br />

Suegene and I panicked on the flight back home r ealising<br />

we had no time to study for the upcoming exams, it<br />

was incontr overtibly all well wor th it.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!