01.02.2015 Views

Genetic engineering of parthenocarpic fruit development in tomato

Genetic engineering of parthenocarpic fruit development in tomato

Genetic engineering of parthenocarpic fruit development in tomato

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Transform your PDFs into Flipbooks and boost your revenue!

Leverage SEO-optimized Flipbooks, powerful backlinks, and multimedia content to professionally showcase your products and significantly increase your reach.

<strong>Genetic</strong> <strong>eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>parthenocarpic</strong><br />

<strong>fruit</strong> <strong>development</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>tomato</strong><br />

Tomato for the fresh<br />

market<br />

DefH9-iaaM gene is able to susta<strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>parthenocarpic</strong> <strong>fruit</strong> <strong>development</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong> two different <strong>tomato</strong> types (either<br />

cherry or round-shaped <strong>fruit</strong>s).<br />

Fruit set percentage and <strong>fruit</strong><br />

quality were not negatively affected<br />

<strong>in</strong> the primary transformants <strong>in</strong><br />

conparison to selfed flowers <strong>of</strong><br />

untrasformed control plants.


DefH9-iaaM gene is able to susta<strong>in</strong> <strong>parthenocarpic</strong> <strong>fruit</strong> <strong>development</strong> <strong>in</strong> two different <strong>tomato</strong> type<br />

(either cherry or round-shaped <strong>fruit</strong>s). = selfed; EM= emasculated.


DefH9-iaaM is expressed <strong>in</strong> <strong>tomato</strong> flower buds


Percentage <strong>of</strong> <strong>fruit</strong> set<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

CM #11 CM #12 CM #13 CM #14 CM Cont L.276 #1 L.276 #4 L.276 #6 L.276 #7 L.276<br />

Cont<br />

genotypes<br />

Fruit set <strong>in</strong> emasculated flowers <strong>of</strong> GM DefH9-iaaM <strong>tomato</strong> plants<br />

Untransformed controls do not set <strong>fruit</strong>s from emasculated flowers


Average <strong>fruit</strong> weight<br />

140,0<br />

120,0<br />

100,0<br />

Selfed<br />

Emasc.<br />

80,0<br />

g<br />

60,0<br />

40,0<br />

20,0<br />

0,0<br />

CM<br />

#11<br />

CM<br />

#12<br />

CM<br />

#13<br />

CM<br />

#14<br />

CM<br />

Cont<br />

L.276<br />

#1<br />

L.276<br />

#4<br />

L.276<br />

#6<br />

L.276<br />

#7<br />

L.276<br />

Cont<br />

genotypes<br />

Ficcadenti N., Sestili S., Pandolf<strong>in</strong>i T., Cirillo C., Rot<strong>in</strong>o G.L., and Spena, A. (1999) <strong>Genetic</strong><br />

<strong>eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>parthenocarpic</strong> <strong>fruit</strong> <strong>development</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>tomato</strong>. Mol. Breed. 5, 463-470.


Greenhouse trial for evaluation <strong>of</strong> <strong>parthenocarpic</strong> transgenic hybrids<br />

(Spr<strong>in</strong>g Cultivation)<br />

Material<br />

3 transgenic hybrids <strong>of</strong> round type <strong>tomato</strong> (one <strong>of</strong> them was F1 Giasone)<br />

1 transgenic hybrid <strong>of</strong> cherry type <strong>tomato</strong> (experimental hybrid)<br />

Untransformed isogenic controls


Number <strong>of</strong> <strong>fruit</strong>s/plant (early production)<br />

25,0<br />

cont rol<br />

transgenic<br />

20,0<br />

15,0<br />

N°<br />

10,0<br />

5,0<br />

0,0<br />

H F1 Giasone H.F1 95-514 H.F1 95-516<br />

hybrids


N°<br />

40,0<br />

35,0<br />

30,0<br />

25,0<br />

20,0<br />

15,0<br />

10,0<br />

5,0<br />

0,0<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> <strong>fruit</strong>s/plant<br />

total prod control<br />

total prod transgenic<br />

H F1 Giasone H.F1 95-514 H.F1 95-516<br />

genotypes


Average <strong>fruit</strong> weight (early prod)<br />

g<br />

160<br />

140<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

H F1 Giasone H.F1 95-514 H.F1 95-516<br />

hybrids<br />

control<br />

transgenic


Early production<br />

3500<br />

control<br />

transgenic<br />

3000<br />

2500<br />

g/plant<br />

2000<br />

1500<br />

1000<br />

500<br />

0<br />

H F1 Giasone H.F1 95-514 H.F1 95-516<br />

Hybrids


Total Production<br />

control<br />

5000<br />

4500<br />

transgenic<br />

4000<br />

3500<br />

3000<br />

2500<br />

2000<br />

1500<br />

1000<br />

500<br />

0<br />

H F1 Giasone H.F1 95-514 H.F1 95-516<br />

Hybrids


Giasone untransformed control<br />

Parthenocarpic DefH9-iaaM Giasone


Cherry type <strong>tomato</strong><br />

Transgenic l<strong>in</strong>e = L CM iaaM x L4<br />

Control l<strong>in</strong>e = L CM x L4


Cherry <strong>tomato</strong><br />

Number <strong>of</strong> <strong>fruit</strong>s<br />

60<br />

transgenic<br />

50<br />

control<br />

40<br />

N°<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

I truss II truss I+II+III trusses total


Cherry <strong>tomato</strong><br />

Average <strong>fruit</strong> weight<br />

30<br />

transgenic<br />

control<br />

25<br />

20<br />

N°<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

I truss II truss I+II+III trusses total


Cherry <strong>tomato</strong><br />

Yield<br />

1600<br />

1400<br />

transgenic<br />

control<br />

1200<br />

1000<br />

g/plant<br />

800<br />

600<br />

400<br />

200<br />

0<br />

I truss II truss I+II+III trusses total


Conclusions<br />

The DefH9-iaaM gene is able to susta<strong>in</strong> <strong>parthenocarpic</strong> <strong>fruit</strong><br />

<strong>development</strong> <strong>in</strong> different types <strong>of</strong> <strong>tomato</strong> for the fresh market,<br />

Marketable <strong>fruit</strong>s are produced under environmental conditions<br />

adverse for poll<strong>in</strong>ation and/or fertilization.<br />

No adverse effects on <strong>fruit</strong> quality<br />

Acciarri N., Ferrari V., Vitelli G., Ficcadenti, N., Pandolf<strong>in</strong>i, T., Spena, A., and Rot<strong>in</strong>o, G.L. (2000) Effetto della<br />

partenocarpia <strong>in</strong> ibridi di pomodoro geneticamente modificati. Informatore Agrario 4, 117-121.


<strong>Genetic</strong> <strong>eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>parthenocarpic</strong><br />

<strong>fruit</strong> <strong>development</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>tomato</strong><br />

Industrial <strong>tomato</strong><br />

(The pickelhauben problem)<br />

In the cv UC82, a cultivar typical<br />

for process<strong>in</strong>g <strong>tomato</strong>es, the<br />

orig<strong>in</strong>al gene DefH9-iaaM causes<br />

the production <strong>of</strong> <strong>parthenocarpic</strong><br />

malformed <strong>fruit</strong>s.<br />

The malformations are similar to<br />

those caused by an excess <strong>of</strong><br />

exogenous aux<strong>in</strong> and/or an<br />

higher sensitivity <strong>of</strong> flowers to the<br />

hormonal treatment.


A genetic solution <strong>of</strong> the “pickelhauben” problem <strong>in</strong> <strong>tomato</strong><br />

Control <strong>fruit</strong><br />

GM malformed <strong>fruit</strong><br />

Development <strong>of</strong> a genetic tool to<br />

reduce the expression and<br />

consequently the action <strong>of</strong> the<br />

DefH9-iaaM gene<br />

Solution:<br />

Downregulation <strong>of</strong> gene expression at the<br />

post-transcriptional level by replac<strong>in</strong>g 53<br />

b upstream the AUG <strong>in</strong>itiation codon <strong>of</strong><br />

the iaaM gene with 87 b <strong>of</strong> the rolA <strong>in</strong>tron<br />

mutated at the splic<strong>in</strong>g sites.


In vitro transcription – translation analysis<br />

a) sequence <strong>of</strong> the mutated rolA <strong>in</strong>tron and scheme <strong>of</strong> the DefH9-RI-iaaM gene<br />

b) <strong>in</strong> vitro transcription-translation. Lane 1 and 2 iaaM transcripts with different ULR.<br />

Lane 4 and 5, <strong>in</strong> vitro translation <strong>of</strong> iaaM (lane 5) and RI-iaaM (lane 4).<br />

RI= reduced by <strong>in</strong>tron


= selfed; EM= emasculated<br />

RT – PCR analysis<br />

Estimated steady state level <strong>of</strong><br />

mRNA <strong>in</strong> <strong>tomato</strong> flower buds:<br />

DefH9-RI-iaaM: 1x10 -8 <strong>of</strong> total mRNA<br />

DefH9-iaaM: 1x10 -7 <strong>of</strong> total mRNA


Total IAA content <strong>in</strong> control and GM flower buds<br />

DefH9-iaaM: 100% (47/47) <strong>of</strong> the transgenic plants with malformed <strong>fruit</strong>s<br />

DefH9-RI-iaaM: 10% (5/44) <strong>of</strong> the transgenic plants with malformed <strong>fruit</strong>s<br />

IAA content <strong>in</strong> flower buds<br />

30,00<br />

25,00<br />

20,00<br />

nmol/g<br />

15,00<br />

10,00<br />

5,00<br />

0,00<br />

ctr DefH9-RI-iaaM DefH9-iaaM<br />

genotypes


Average, maximun and m<strong>in</strong>imum values <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dependent<br />

transgenic plants for DefH9-Ri-iaam (18 plants), DefH9-<br />

iaaM (4 plants) and controls for percentage <strong>of</strong> <strong>fruit</strong> set<br />

from emasculated flowers and average <strong>fruit</strong> weight<br />

derived from emasculated and selfed flowers.<br />

Fruit<br />

set (%)<br />

Fruit weight<br />

(g)<br />

emasculated selfed<br />

aver m<strong>in</strong>-max aver m<strong>in</strong>-max<br />

RI-iaaM 100-73 46 88-25 58 91-42<br />

iaaM 100-87 77 105-32 67 81-39<br />

control 12-0 10.2 48


Conclusions<br />

The modification <strong>of</strong> the 5’ULR <strong>of</strong> the DefH9-iaaM<br />

gene (i.e. DefH9-RI-iaaM gene) allows to produce<br />

high quality <strong>parthenocarpic</strong> <strong>fruit</strong>s <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustrial<br />

<strong>tomato</strong>es (e.g. UC82).<br />

This method may solve the problem <strong>of</strong> a too high<br />

expressivity <strong>of</strong> a trait(s) when us<strong>in</strong>g transgenes<br />

affect<strong>in</strong>g phytohormone synthesis.<br />

Pandolf<strong>in</strong>i T., Rot<strong>in</strong>o G.L., Camer<strong>in</strong>i S., R. Defez, Spena A., 2002. Optimisation <strong>of</strong> transgene action at<br />

the post-transcriptional level: high quality <strong>parthenocarpic</strong> <strong>fruit</strong>s <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustrial <strong>tomato</strong>es. BMC<br />

Biotechnology 2(1) http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6750/2/1/.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!