We All are Europe - AESAEC
We All are Europe - AESAEC
We All are Europe - AESAEC
Transform your PDFs into Flipbooks and boost your revenue!
Leverage SEO-optimized Flipbooks, powerful backlinks, and multimedia content to professionally showcase your products and significantly increase your reach.
<strong>We</strong> <strong>All</strong> <strong>We</strong> <strong>All</strong> <strong>are</strong> <strong>Europe</strong><br />
Participation of Older,<br />
and other Active <strong>Europe</strong>an Citizens<br />
A Handbook Supporting Active <strong>Europe</strong>an Citizenship by Conceiving,<br />
Submitting and Managing EU Projects<br />
<strong>AESAEC</strong><br />
A c t i v e E u r o p e a n<br />
S e n i o r s f o r A c t i v e<br />
E u r o p e a n C i t i z e n s h i p
The <strong>AESAEC</strong> project (Project No 141757-2008-LLP-AT-GRUNDTVIG-GMP) has been funded with support from the <strong>Europe</strong>an<br />
Commission, represented by the Education and Culture DG.<br />
This publication reflects the views only of the author/project group, and neither the Commission nor the DG can be held<br />
responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.<br />
3
Publisher/Editor:<br />
<strong>AESAEC</strong> Project Group<br />
Authors:<br />
Proof-reading in English:<br />
Layout and design:<br />
Cover design:<br />
Printed by:<br />
Michael Schwaiger (Auxilium/AT)<br />
Max Reisinger, Katrin Meister (ISSAK-VHS Graz/AT)<br />
Steffen Hartje (Fritid & Samfund/DK)<br />
Teresa Diaz Bello, Yolanda Mates (ASAEL/ES)<br />
Patrizia Giorio, Bettina Bussi (CO & SO Network/IT)<br />
Csilla Lázár (Soros Educational Center Foundation/RO)<br />
Dušana Findeisen (The Slovenian 3 rd Age University/SI)<br />
Irtysh Language Services (UK)<br />
Michael Schwaiger<br />
Anne Sprotofski<br />
dieGrafikZone, www.dieGrafikZone.at<br />
dieGrafikZone, www.dieGrafikZone.at<br />
© 2010 by <strong>AESAEC</strong> Project Group, represented by Auxilium Pro Regionibus Europae in Rebus Culturalibus, Geidorfplatz<br />
2, A-8010 Graz<br />
<strong>All</strong> rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means<br />
(including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from the<br />
publisher. For permission or more information please contact office@auxilium.co.at or any of the organisations<br />
listed on the back of this publication.<br />
ISBN 978-3-9502999-0-8<br />
4
Preface<br />
This handbook is a result of the project Active <strong>Europe</strong>an Seniors for Active <strong>Europe</strong>an Citizenship<br />
(www.aesaec.eu) that has been supported by the <strong>Europe</strong>an Commission through the Grundtvig Action<br />
(dealing with general adult learning) of the Lifelong Learning Programme<br />
(http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/llp/about_llp/about_llp_en.php).<br />
The basic idea of this project was to link a target group with a target <strong>are</strong>a and a target activity<br />
which <strong>are</strong> usually not often linked to each other:<br />
• our target group is senior citizens, aged around 60 year and over<br />
• the target <strong>are</strong>a is Active <strong>Europe</strong>an Citizenship, in the sense of actively supporting the ideals<br />
and values of the <strong>Europe</strong>an Union and promoting knowledge of its policies, structures, citizens,<br />
cultures etc. by feeling and understanding oneself as an active part of this process<br />
• the target activity was <strong>Europe</strong>an project management as a legal framework and as a source<br />
of funding for such kind of activities.<br />
The general aim of the project was to introduce the concept of <strong>Europe</strong>an Citizenship to <strong>Europe</strong>’s<br />
senior citizens and to make clear to them how they could personally benefit from active participation<br />
with this concept. On the other hand, it is absolutely necessary for the <strong>Europe</strong>an Union to involve<br />
senior citizens more in its processes and concept development; only if the EU can manage to<br />
be accepted and proactively supported by this extremely large group of citizens, with all its life<br />
experience and knowhow, can a sustainable and positive development of a modern <strong>Europe</strong> at the<br />
social, political, cultural, economic and ecological levels be expected. The EU programmes and<br />
funds that we worked with in our project were understood as being one of the missing links between<br />
the EU and its senior citizens as well as being perfect catalysts in bringing them closer to each other.<br />
The main product of our project is a training course based on this handbook with two major parts:<br />
• Part A contains three short chapters about pedagogic concepts and guidelines which might<br />
be helpful when organising and implementing training courses for senior learners<br />
• Part B has seven modules dealing with the <strong>Europe</strong>an Union, the concept of Active <strong>Europe</strong>an<br />
Citizenship, the Senior Volunteering Programme, the <strong>Europe</strong> for Citizens Programme as<br />
well as about how to design, structure, write, budget, submit and implement EU projects<br />
under these programmes.<br />
As said above, primarily our intention was to focus on senior citizens as learners, however during<br />
the testing phases of this course, we realised that this handbook can be a very helpful source of<br />
information and know-how for anybody interested in the EU, Active <strong>Europe</strong>an Citizenship and EU<br />
project management. So, please do consider that the content of this handbook is less age-oriented<br />
as it was originally planned – which means it might be worth having a look at it regardless of the<br />
date of birth stated in your passport.<br />
<strong>We</strong> wish you an enjoyable, entertaining and sustainable learning experience.<br />
The <strong>AESAEC</strong> project group<br />
5
Contents<br />
Part A: The Pedagogical Concept 11<br />
I. The conceptual framework of the <strong>AESAEC</strong> educational programme<br />
Dušana Findeisen (Slovenian 3 rd Age University, Ljubljana/SI)<br />
13<br />
I.1. Introduction 13<br />
I.2. Towards understanding old age, senior citizens’ needs and issues and their<br />
active role in the community<br />
14<br />
I.3. The changing society 15<br />
I.4. Conclusion 18<br />
II. Findings of the IANUS project and their relevance for the <strong>AESAEC</strong> E-<br />
educational programme<br />
Patrizia Giorio (FormAzione, CO&SO Network, Firenze/IT)<br />
III. Authentic Location Learning, Multi-sensorial Learning and Learning by<br />
Doing as innovative pedagogic elements of the <strong>AESAEC</strong> educational<br />
concept<br />
Michael Schwaiger (Auxilium, Graz/AT)<br />
20<br />
23<br />
III.1. Introduction 23<br />
III.2. Authentic Location Learning 25<br />
III.3. Multi-sensory Learning 26<br />
III.4. Learning by doing 27<br />
Part B: Learner’s Manual 29<br />
Module 1 – The <strong>Europe</strong>an Union and its Relevance for Senior Citizens<br />
Dušana Findeisen (The Slovenian 3 rd Age University/SI)<br />
Module 2 - The Concept of Active <strong>Europe</strong>an Citizenship and its Relevance for<br />
Senior Citizens<br />
Steffen Hartje (Fritid&Samfund/DK)<br />
31<br />
45<br />
2.1. Why is AEC important for senior citizens 45<br />
2.2. The role of civil society in the development of AEC 47<br />
2.3. Development of new communities in the EU 49<br />
2.4. Reflection upon the opportunities for AEC involvement in the future 50<br />
7
Module 3 - The <strong>Europe</strong> for Citizens Programme (ECP) and its relevance for<br />
AEC and Senior Citizens<br />
Teresa Diaz Bello/Yolanda Mates (ASAEL/ES)<br />
53<br />
3.1. The <strong>Europe</strong> for Citizens Programme (ECP) 53<br />
3.2. Action 1 of the ECP and its relevance for AEC and Senior Citizens 55<br />
3.3. Action 2 of the ECP and its relevance for AEC and Senior Citizens 58<br />
3.4. Action 3 of the ECP and its relevance for AEC and Senior Citizens 59<br />
3.5. Action 4 of the ECP and its relevance for AEC and Senior Citizens 60<br />
3.6. Think Tank 62<br />
Module 4 - The Grundtvig Initiative on Volunteering in <strong>Europe</strong> for Seniors<br />
(GIVE) and its relevance for AEC and Senior Citizens<br />
Csilla Lázár (Soros Educational Center Foundation/RO)<br />
65<br />
4.1. The Lifelong Learning Programme (LLP) and Grundtvig in a nutshell 65<br />
4.2. Volunteering as a form of Active Citizenship 69<br />
4.3. Senior Volunteering Exchange Projects 74<br />
4.4. GIVE - Initiative on Volunteering in <strong>Europe</strong> for Seniors 78<br />
Module 5 - The Art of Successful Project Proposal Writing II: Linguistic part<br />
Max Reisinger/ Katrin Meister (VHS Graz/AT)/<br />
Michael Schwaiger (Auxilium/AT)<br />
84<br />
5.1. General considerations concerning communication 84<br />
5.2. Working with texts and writing an application 87<br />
5.3. Advertising psychology meets application writing 92<br />
Module 6 - The Art of Successful Project Proposal Writing I: the technical<br />
part<br />
Bettina Bussi/Patrizia Giorio (CO & SO Network/IT)<br />
97<br />
6.1. How to build a project group 97<br />
6.2. The project plan 103<br />
6.3. The evaluation plan 107<br />
6.4. The dissemination plan 109<br />
6.5. The Project budget 112<br />
8
Module 7 - How to implement a project successfully<br />
Michael Schwaiger (AUXILIUM/AT)<br />
116<br />
7.1. Considerations before starting with the project work 116<br />
7.2. Project meetings and international visits 123<br />
7.3. Monitoring and evaluation 130<br />
7.4. Dissemination and valorisation 136<br />
<strong>AESAEC</strong> - Glossary 141<br />
9
Part A: Pedagogical Concept<br />
11
The conceptual framework<br />
I. The conceptual framework of the <strong>AESAEC</strong> educational programme<br />
(Dušana Findeisen, Slovenian 3 rd Age University, Ljubljana/SI)<br />
I.1. Introduction<br />
The <strong>AESAEC</strong> project focuses on older people being full and active members of local, national and<br />
<strong>Europe</strong>an communities, despite the fact that people in later life <strong>are</strong> burdened by social stereotypes<br />
about them and they tend to think that it is not up to them to intervene in community life. <strong>We</strong><br />
firmly believe that senior citizens should and will be involved in important decision making processes<br />
that concern themselves and other generations in the community; we further believe that<br />
lifelong learning is important in later life, having a strong impact on both the learner and the community.<br />
Moreover, when learning, education and training take place within <strong>Europe</strong>an projects devised<br />
by senior citizens themselves the transformational impact becomes even stronger.<br />
The <strong>AESAEC</strong> project includes the development of an educational and training programme for older<br />
citizens enabling them:<br />
to change their own, and to some extent also the social, outdated image of them being<br />
not very active and not participating in the community in old age, freeing themselves from<br />
their own stereotypes<br />
to better understand their own needs and issues and the need for intergenerational bonds<br />
(solidarity, co-existence and cooperation among generations)<br />
to become familiar with <strong>Europe</strong>an institutions and <strong>Europe</strong>an policies related to older people’s<br />
needs and issues<br />
as a result of education and training senior citizens should be able to devise a <strong>Europe</strong>an project<br />
and apply for funding, and hopefully implement.<br />
Any type and format of education for older people has its topic, of course. But any type and format<br />
of education in later life is also, simultaneously, education for empowerment. Therefore trainers,<br />
mentors and students engaged in educational programmes <strong>are</strong> concerned with achieving a better<br />
understanding of what old age in contemporary <strong>Europe</strong>an society can and should be.<br />
There <strong>are</strong> different ways of how to increase aw<strong>are</strong>ness about major social changes and what impact<br />
they have on the intergenerational relationship; aw<strong>are</strong>ness about older workers and their position,<br />
flexibility and security, combating age barriers at work, the right to work and the right to receive a<br />
pension, active ageing in the broader sense of the word, mandatory or compulsive retirement,<br />
structured free time in later life, opportunities to cooperate with other generations, voluntary activities,<br />
policies about old age and people in later life, style(s) of life in retirement and old age<br />
etc.<br />
13
Therefore, we thought the conceptual framework of the <strong>AESAEC</strong> training programme should include<br />
not only knowledge about <strong>Europe</strong>an institutions and policies concerning older people and knowledge<br />
about how a project proposal is shaped. <strong>We</strong> thought that students in later life involved in preparing<br />
a <strong>Europe</strong>an project proposal should start by increasing knowledge about themselves and their position<br />
in society and also learn more about how they can contribute towards changing society for the<br />
better.<br />
I.2. Towards understanding old age, senior citizens’ needs and issues and their active role in<br />
the community<br />
In most <strong>We</strong>stern <strong>Europe</strong>an countries old age did not emerge as a political and social issue until the<br />
1950s. After the Second World War, <strong>Europe</strong> was mainly interested in repairing the damage and looking<br />
towards the future focussing on the younger generations, often forgetting about older people.<br />
Older people were portrayed by social stereotypes as passive not interested in any kind of participation<br />
in society. In the <strong>AESAEC</strong> project and training we <strong>are</strong> interested in the new <strong>Europe</strong>an attitudes<br />
towards older people and new <strong>Europe</strong>an approaches towards participation of senior citizens in<br />
community life and education associated with it. In addition we <strong>are</strong> interested in examples of good<br />
practice in this field as a source of learning.<br />
14<br />
An active senior citizen who is ready to devise a <strong>Europe</strong>an project proposal, prep<strong>are</strong> an application<br />
and eventually implement the project, if the proposal is successful, should have knowledge about<br />
the existing frame programmes and above all should be familiar with values and concepts concerning<br />
older people, old age, the style of life of older people, pension schemes, active ageing and<br />
other policies, the right to a pension and the right to work, the right to social security, flexible security,<br />
etc. Moreover, he or she should also know about the <strong>Europe</strong>an institutions and policies that<br />
concern older people and their relationships with other generations as well as the most important<br />
<strong>Europe</strong>an non-governmental organisations dealing with the issues of older people. He or she should<br />
be aw<strong>are</strong> that older people <strong>are</strong> not all the same, as actually they <strong>are</strong> all different, much more different<br />
than the members within the younger generations and therefore he or she should stand for<br />
the right to be different in later life, to have his or her own style of life, to be differently treated<br />
by policies, etc.. Not all older people <strong>are</strong> patients and their ageing is not necessarily pathological,<br />
but rather normal, not all older people <strong>are</strong> poor, not all older people <strong>are</strong> helpless or functionally<br />
illiterate. An active senior citizen should therefore stand up against the discourse of weakness and<br />
dependence adopted in most policies, by the media, public statements and other texts about people<br />
in later life. Moreover, not all older people <strong>are</strong> grandmothers and grandfathers, as they can<br />
have different social roles. They can be workers, volunteers, learners, etc. They differ according to<br />
the status they have in society. They have different needs if they <strong>are</strong> employed or not, if they <strong>are</strong><br />
volunteers or not, if they live alone or in a family, if they have a partner or not, if they have managed<br />
to create a large or a small social network, if in their network younger people <strong>are</strong> included, if<br />
this network is a source of emotional support and information, that is an open network, or if it is
The conceptual framework<br />
closed one consisting mainly of family members. They differ if they have health concerns or not, if<br />
they <strong>are</strong> men or women, if they <strong>are</strong> well educated or not. They differ because the course of their<br />
life and their social roles have been very different. They have a different style of life. They differ<br />
according to these and other criteria but they <strong>are</strong> least different because of their different ages.<br />
Age may be an important factor with youngsters growing up, but not adults! It is time to free ourselves<br />
from these views and stereotypes about older people. Consequently, policies concerning<br />
older people <strong>are</strong> not free of these views and stereotypes and an older citizen devising a <strong>Europe</strong>an<br />
project proposal should be aw<strong>are</strong> of them and should not repeat them while preparing a project<br />
proposal. This does not seem to be an easy task, since stereotypes about old age <strong>are</strong> often consolidated<br />
by older people themselves. Consolidating stereotypes does not help in creating a new image<br />
of older people who <strong>are</strong> well engaged in community matters and contributing towards different<br />
policies. Combating stereotypes can be an important task to be tackled by <strong>Europe</strong>an projects concerning<br />
older people. Such projects should be ambitious, conceptual, accompanied by intensive<br />
public campaigning and possibly they should be intergenerational. Older people should not be applauded<br />
just because they have reached the age of eighty or more, and shall we say, use computers<br />
or because they try to live imitating younger people. They should be applauded for their contribution,<br />
for having achieved something valuable for themselves and the community.<br />
Government policies in many <strong>Europe</strong>an countries concerning old age and ageing currently develop<br />
mostly in three directions:<br />
a permanent dialogue with those who have just retired and <strong>are</strong> aw<strong>are</strong> of their own impending<br />
old age and old age as it is today for those who have been retired for some time<br />
development of services in close collaboration with families and their neighbourhood<br />
creation of opportunities for older people to be, on an equal basis with other generations, a<br />
part of the community.<br />
Most problems arise within this last <strong>are</strong>a. Why Because older people <strong>are</strong> predominately regarded as<br />
being dependent and in need of help from others. Moreover <strong>Europe</strong>an policies often develop in the<br />
same way , with a great deal of consulting NGOs and individual senior citizens at different stages of<br />
the period called between work retirement and old age.<br />
I.3. The changing society<br />
Senior citizens planning to engage in <strong>Europe</strong>an projects <strong>are</strong> expected to have an in depth view of<br />
the major social changes affecting all generations and the relationships between them. Enlightened<br />
adaptation to these and other changes in society and within communities can be a topic and aim of<br />
<strong>Europe</strong>an projects. What <strong>are</strong> the major changes in society affecting all generations<br />
15
a) Paid work: Unbalanced public finances reflect the disappearance from society of »paid work and<br />
a regular monthly income« Today's forms of work, performed by the current middle generations,<br />
differ from Keynesian times, when permanent, full-time employment was the norm; predominant<br />
today <strong>are</strong> fixed-term jobs, part-time jobs, home-working, tele-working, the grey market economy,<br />
alternating periods of employment, education and training and flexible security. <strong>We</strong> <strong>are</strong> facing a<br />
transition from »a civilisation of work and stability « to a period of instability, temporarity and, for<br />
many, also diminished prosperity and a sense of precariousness. The new types of employment<br />
tend to affect the lives and work of older people and their participation in the community. Younger<br />
people and older people <strong>are</strong> today much more concerned about what is happening in the community<br />
since they <strong>are</strong> much more affected by the changes within it. It is time for them to be more<br />
active within different communities, locally, nationally, <strong>Europe</strong>an-wide or even globally.<br />
Occasional paid or voluntary work performed by older people can result in new jobs for younger<br />
people. Not every type of work can turn into a full time job. Initially an activity develops step by<br />
step. Work can be then performed in the form of occasional activities and occasional paid work.<br />
Such work is more easily taken on by older people, since they already have some regular income.<br />
But occasional activities can later become full time jobs for younger people. Older people do not<br />
“steal” jobs from younger people, since they take on different types of activities comp<strong>are</strong>d to<br />
younger people. Having a permanent job is hardly a good solution for older people and what is<br />
more, they do not want to be employed full-time. The third age has different characteristics to<br />
those of the second age.<br />
The social position of several groups comprising of members of younger generations is becoming<br />
similar to that of older people. These groups contain young first-time job seekers, unemployed middle-aged<br />
persons, the permanently unemployed older workers, people in between fixed-term contracts,<br />
as well as persons who <strong>are</strong> unemployable due to their level of qualification and skills and <strong>are</strong><br />
pushed to the edge of society. In today's societies, looking for solutions for older people, therefore,<br />
means also finding solutions for the above-mentioned groups that also exist within communities.<br />
b) New technologies <strong>are</strong> not very accessible for all older people; if any members of the community<br />
<strong>are</strong> denied access to modern technology, all generations and the whole community <strong>are</strong> affected. If<br />
they <strong>are</strong> without access to information they cannot integrate into the community, they cannot keep<br />
pace with progress, they cannot enter the e-economy, e-government, e-education, e-<br />
communication, etc. and, thus, they <strong>are</strong> more and more dependent on the active working population.<br />
Without older people having access to technology then communities <strong>are</strong> less integrative for<br />
them. <strong>We</strong> wonder whether in our society dependence on employment can be reduced and a different<br />
basis, more in tune with actual social developments, can be found.<br />
16
The conceptual framework<br />
c) The urgent need to preserve human and social capital that is being neglected: Older people <strong>are</strong><br />
possessors of non-tangible and invisible cultural heritage (experiential knowledge, skills, beliefs,<br />
customs etc) that needs to be preserved, maintained and passed onto younger generations if its<br />
continuity is to be ensured. The overlooked abilities and knowledge of older people form an important<br />
part of human and social capital. Their activation and employment could improve the social<br />
position of older people, and, in addition, lessen the burden of younger generations. Presently society<br />
is wasting a considerable part of the human capital it possesses and could foster, which is a<br />
disaster for the information society, based as it is on knowledge. Modern states and modern communities<br />
can preserve and strengthen their vitality mostly through the human and social capital<br />
that is available. Moreover the ageing society is being looked upon as a threat and, a failure but it<br />
could be regarded as a success. A success for our civilisation, which it is.<br />
A considerable number of older people with readily available and experientially validated knowledge<br />
<strong>are</strong> now on hand for the benefit of the community. Moreover, we should not be so concerned<br />
about the decreasing birth rate. On the contrary what we should be concerned about is the »quality»<br />
of our children or grandchildren; about how to develop their sensibility, tolerance, resistance<br />
to stress, ability to relate and respect others and their ability to build a community. <strong>We</strong> should focus<br />
on their values, knowledge and cultural aw<strong>are</strong>ness to as indicators of their quality! Quality<br />
seems here to be in overriding quantity. <strong>We</strong> may say so. The quality of our children will help communities<br />
survive as well as the quality of older people!<br />
An integrative community should take c<strong>are</strong> and exploit for its advantage the knowledge and abilities<br />
of its members, notwithstanding their age. The lack of infrastructural networks enabling older<br />
people to become reintegrated into society, leads to their social exclusion and isolation. How can<br />
older people create and maintain their social networks How can they obtain support: materials,<br />
emotional support, information and knowledge How can they start dealing with community matters<br />
and how from can they participate in the society What networks of public institutions and organised<br />
structures <strong>are</strong> available to the elderly in today's <strong>Europe</strong> Are there real opportunities for them<br />
to socialise, opportunities for goal- oriented, engaging free-time activities that bring about real<br />
individual and social changes, opportunities for learning and for education, <strong>are</strong> there specialised job<br />
centres for older citizens, specialised medical services, geriatric hospital wards, organisations<br />
providing voluntary work and training for older people, cultural organisations for older people How<br />
can older people re-enter society, or rather, how can we prevent older people from being excluded<br />
How can they secure for themselves an equal position with that of other generations in society to be<br />
able to live fulfilling lives in their later years a period of 20-30 or more years<br />
d) Ageing society requires active old age – new ways for social integration: The ageing society has<br />
brought about more interest in older people. Older people, like anybody else, can become reintegrated<br />
into society only by being active. The experience of many retired people has shown that<br />
17
they may be more successful when joining new social groups, by getting involved in new activities.<br />
It is impossible to list all the activities senior citizens can participate in together with other people.<br />
Given a bit of support and advice as well as adequate training / education, every individual can find<br />
something he or she would enjoy doing. To discover what other people need and what they <strong>are</strong> willing<br />
to accept, identify the things that may become a new challenge for him or her. The choices and<br />
attractions of this period <strong>are</strong> always very personal. The time has finally come when one is allowed<br />
to do what one is fond of and interested in. As an illustration, let us just mention a few possibilities:<br />
one can learn how to play a musical instrument, take up performing, painting, exhibiting, researching,<br />
translating, one can become involved with museums, work as an assistant custodian or tourist<br />
guide, do voluntary work within an organisation, set up a club or society, take up calligraphy, design<br />
websites, write for and read stories to nursery school children, co-operate in the design of the curriculum<br />
for local community schools, take c<strong>are</strong> of one's garden or perform gardening services for<br />
others, give advice, provide learning and psychological help, instruct younger people and people of<br />
one’s own age, make plans, design, become involved in politics, work with the media, establish a<br />
company, write and publish books, or participate in community matters representing one’s peers<br />
and all other generations. <strong>All</strong> activities should, however, have a clearly defined objective and operative<br />
plan. For older people to have their position changed within communities and society it is<br />
necessary however, to undertake such activities that <strong>are</strong> goal oriented and can bring about<br />
change in their personal life and in society<br />
I.4. Conclusion<br />
People in later life relate to other generations and therefore should be more extensively engaged in<br />
shaping the life of communities. Cooperation between generations and solidarity among generations<br />
is possible only when senior citizens can and <strong>are</strong> allowed to age actively. Local, national and <strong>Europe</strong>an<br />
policies should therefore address people in later life as active people, people with potential<br />
and as people with a variety of psycho-social needs. Senior citizens who <strong>are</strong> ready to engage in preparing<br />
<strong>Europe</strong>an project proposals concerning themselves and their peers as well as relationship<br />
with other generations should take c<strong>are</strong> to counter stereotypes which <strong>are</strong> contrary to the new image<br />
of active and participating senior citizens. To this end senior citizens preparing a project proposal<br />
need to have an improved understanding of <strong>Europe</strong>an institutions and their policies relating to<br />
old age, as well as knowledge about <strong>Europe</strong>an NGO activities concerned with older people’s issues.<br />
Adapting to social changes or preparing for their consequences affecting older people can be both a<br />
topic and aim of <strong>Europe</strong>an projects.<br />
Bibliography:<br />
Durandal, J-Ph.V. (2003) : Le Pouvoir gris. Sociologie des groupes de pression de retraites. PUF. Paris.<br />
Guillemard, A.-M. (1986): Le declin du social. PUF. Paris.<br />
Erikson, E.H. et al (1989): Vital Involvement in old age. W.W. Norton & Company. New York.<br />
Findeisen, D.: Educating the 45+ to understand and change their social position.<br />
18
The conceptual framework<br />
Kroehnert, S./Hosmann, I./Klimgholtz, R.(2008): <strong>Europe</strong>’s Demographic Future. Berlin Institute for Population and Development.<br />
Rečnik, M.: Izobraževanje st<strong>are</strong>jših odraslih, Education of the elderly. ACS, Ljubljana, 2000, str. 13-38<br />
Roberts, K. (1981): Leisure. Longman. London.<br />
Rojek, C. (2000): Leisure and Culture. Palgrave Macmillan. New York.<br />
Shields, R. (1997): Flow, Space and Culture. No.1, Volume.1, pp. 1-9<br />
19
II. Findings of the IANUS project and their relevance for the <strong>AESAEC</strong><br />
Educational Programme (Patrizia Giorio, FormAzione CO&SO Network, Firenze/IT)<br />
The Grundtvig project IANUS – Standards for Intergenerational, Intercultural and IT-based Later<br />
Learning (N°134057-LLP-1-2007-1-AT-GRUNDTVIG-GMP) has tried from 2007 to 2009 to identify and<br />
analyse those factors which <strong>are</strong> likely to influence later learning activities throughout <strong>Europe</strong> in a<br />
positive or negative way.<br />
It is fact that at the <strong>Europe</strong>an level the labour market crisis which has occurred in the few last years<br />
has determined a revision and renewal of the Lisbon strategy to foster and support growth and job<br />
creation by a range of structural reforms. In many countries there is limited public aw<strong>are</strong>ness of the<br />
potential of older people and the necessity to increase their social activity and participation in national<br />
life in order to improve their living conditions as rightful members of all EU countries as a<br />
consequences themes such as Active Citizenship <strong>are</strong> becoming more and more important in our<br />
countries.<br />
Learning in later life is a relatively recent concept which is stipulated by <strong>Europe</strong>an and national<br />
bodies, pedagogues, experts in psychology and medicine, by vocational training institutes and nonprofit<br />
organizations. However it is not well-known as a comprehensive approach in different public<br />
spheres which targets at increasing the authority and the influence of older people and at the same<br />
time diminishing existing stereotypes that the third age is generally characterised by poor health,<br />
decreasing social activity and less interest in life.<br />
That is why guidelines and training programmes with regard to EU educational policy <strong>are</strong> recommended<br />
and <strong>are</strong> necessary to foster the dissemination of good practice examples. In order to further<br />
develop the concept of later learning at the <strong>Europe</strong>an level we report some key elements that<br />
<strong>are</strong> important when later learners <strong>are</strong> the beneficiaries of training at different levels:<br />
Bio-genetic and psychological factors:<br />
- general accomplishment of human brain in connection with age<br />
- life time of the human brain and brain re-growth<br />
- memory and reproduction processes/interactive memory systems in the human brain<br />
- physical and psychophysical problems<br />
- emotional development<br />
- gender aspects<br />
Social psychological dimension:<br />
- intrinsic and extrinsic motivation for learning at the age 50+<br />
- internal and external learning barriers<br />
- ability of later learners to view reality from a wider perspective as an effect of maturity<br />
- establishing a psychological sense of community and a sense of “we”<br />
- generate a social process of inclusion<br />
20
Findings of the IANUS project<br />
Structural dimension on national / regional / local levels:<br />
- legal aspects and responsibilities<br />
- traditions and approaches towards later learning<br />
- existing networks and projects<br />
Institutional dimension:<br />
- course planning and organization<br />
- ways of mixing intergenerational / intercultural learning groups<br />
- marketing<br />
- registration procedures<br />
- communication strategies<br />
- ability of trainers<br />
- course settings<br />
- testing settings and quality assurance.<br />
Pedagogical dimension:<br />
- quality recommendations concerning methods, didactics, training materials<br />
- blended learning solutions<br />
- usage of ICT learning environment<br />
- trainer-learner relations<br />
- learner-learner-relations<br />
- advantages and challenges when working with groups heterogeneous in age and culture<br />
- learning from older people<br />
- types of educational guides to encourage cooperative learning amonst older people that<br />
need to be considered<br />
- lively trainer-learner and learner-learner interaction based on trust<br />
- importance of mentoring<br />
- suitability of learning contents for later learning<br />
- assumptions about the individual learners’ prior knowledge<br />
- adapting the language used in class to the target group of later learners<br />
- gender aspects from the didactical perspective<br />
- the effect and the importance of the size of groups on the learning process<br />
EU adult education policy dimension:<br />
- tools, instruments and concepts of the Commission’s adult education policy relevant/appropriate<br />
to the target group<br />
- suggestions to the Commission to modify existing tools, instruments and concepts, such as<br />
EUROPASS, mobility programmes etc., and to increase their relevance for the target<br />
group<br />
- suggestions to the Commission to develop and introduce new tools, instruments and concepts<br />
to react appropriately, and in time, to demands and needs of those responsible for<br />
21
and/or interested in adult education, such as ministries, social partners, training organizations,<br />
umbrella organizations of target group etc. to improve their support for later/intergenerational<br />
learning<br />
Following tips and hints were developed as part of the IANUS guidelines to support the trainers in<br />
order to overcome the factors stated above:<br />
trainers must have knowledge of the heterogeneity of the group<br />
respect for and focus on individuals<br />
knowledge of different political, cultural and institutional approaches towards later learning<br />
knowledge of the development of projects in the field of later learning<br />
ability to support process-oriented learning and reciprocal learning (learning from each<br />
other) with the shift of emphasis from teaching to learning through the development of<br />
new and diverse didactic approaches, which enable participants to sh<strong>are</strong> their insights<br />
and knowledge with one another<br />
ability to adapt the learning contents to the needs of the heterogeneous target group of<br />
later learners<br />
ability to include different roles of female and male learners in the learning process and to<br />
raise the people’s aw<strong>are</strong>ness of the development of gender roles in different societies<br />
development of special skills in the sense of strengthening, especially women’s selfconfidence<br />
in the learning-setting<br />
co-responsibility with regard to group dynamics: support of<br />
learner-learner relations based on trust<br />
lively trainer-learner and<br />
ability to develop individual goals to be achieved during the learning-process<br />
ability to argue for cultural diversity and for the present-day reality of belonging to a <strong>Europe</strong>an<br />
cultural community<br />
flexible learning programmes and seminars in terms of duration, content and venues<br />
necessity and ability to encourage cross-disciplinary working<br />
making the target group aw<strong>are</strong> of the necessity and the benefits - in a cognitive, practical<br />
and social nature - of learning in later life<br />
fostering the understanding of older people as rightful members in all EU countries<br />
Bibliography:<br />
www.ianusllp.com<br />
22
Authentic Location Learning, Multi-sensorial Learning and Learning by Doing<br />
III. Authentic Location Learning, Multi-sensorial Learning and Learning<br />
by Doing as innovative pedagogic elements of the <strong>AESAEC</strong> educational<br />
concept (Michael Schwaiger, Auxilium, Graz/AT)<br />
III.1. Introduction<br />
The <strong>AESAEC</strong> project group endeavoured, above all, to ensure that the pedagogical orientation of the<br />
training contents as we well as their didactical implementation were in tune with the needs and<br />
general framework of the target group, which is older people aged 60+. From this it should not be<br />
deduced that these pedagogical and didactical arrangements <strong>are</strong> only valid specifically for older<br />
people. It is more a case of dealing with core elements of educational theory, which have been<br />
developed for other categories of learners and <strong>are</strong> of universal relevance. Their use is, however,<br />
especially promising as educational concepts for older learners, as they help to maintain long-term<br />
motivation to learn, to increase the prospect of sustainable learning success and to develop specifically<br />
the learner’s ability to apply what they have learnt. They also allow the greater life experience<br />
that older people have (in comparison to younger learners) to flow deliberately into the lesson.<br />
In principle our pedagogical thinking is on the basis, that formal learning processes, in addition to<br />
simply conveying knowledge and information, should above all have the aim of (further) developing<br />
relevant core skills in the learner; in particular this includes the following:<br />
cognitive skills (analytical thinking, logic, problem-solving, planning etc.)<br />
affective skills (esteem, sympathy, identification etc)<br />
methodical skills (knowledge about the use of methods and instruments etc.)<br />
social skills (communication, conflict resolution, teamwork etc.)<br />
Intercultural skills (knowledge about own / foreign cultures, acting in an intercultural context<br />
etc.)<br />
conative skills (effort, engagement etc.)<br />
The list of these core skills could be added to further, and the terms stated can be regarded to neither<br />
be differentiated out nor do they sharply differ from each other. This list provides, however, a<br />
basic insight of which central elements the project group paid particular attention to in the course<br />
development. In this context it is important to understand that the project group saw the traditional<br />
learning requirements – conveying, strengthening and reproducing knowledge and content –<br />
as being insufficient by a long way. Much more the project group has over and above this endeavoured<br />
to provide the learners with sufficient ability to act in a way, which has made it possible for<br />
what has been learnt to be sustainable, original and autonomous in order – in the widest sense – to<br />
meet needs and solve problems.<br />
23
To attain this ability to act, the aforementioned comprehensive and multilayered subsets of skills<br />
must be conveyed or activated. In conclusion the demands of the <strong>AESAEC</strong> course <strong>are</strong> no less than…<br />
to bring the <strong>Europe</strong>an Union, in terms of its relevance to older people, closer to learners,<br />
in which a clearly defined objective is that the learner, at the end of the course, attaches<br />
a higher degree of importance to the EU and has a deeper sense of being a <strong>Europe</strong>an citizen<br />
in comparison to when the course began.<br />
to inform learners about the opportunities offered by EU funding programmes and their<br />
contents with relevance to senior citizens, and together to analyse and assess their advantages<br />
and disadvantages, chances and risks.<br />
to motivate learners to actually apply for and implement an EU project about a topic that<br />
can, to a high degree, be personally identified with.<br />
to support the learners in order to independently design an EU project and, in cooperation<br />
with international project partners, to submit an application.<br />
to offer support to the learners for the successful and sustainable implementation of the<br />
international cooperation project.<br />
to integrate the learners into long-term and sustainable cooperation, networking activities<br />
and <strong>Europe</strong>an processes at the national and international levels.<br />
In order to achieve these multilayered aims, or rather to address and convey the aforementioned<br />
skills, the project group has, in its pedagogical concept, reached agreement on the use of a likewise<br />
multilayered mix of methods and instruments. The central subject of this concept is the learner (or<br />
group of learners), who represents the focal point of the learning process throughout the duration<br />
of the whole course, and who either alone, or together with others, shapes, influence and steers.<br />
The more active this role is applied and taken up the greater the likelihood that this course will<br />
achieve its objectives that have been outlined above. This of course means that each individual<br />
learner likewise carries a sh<strong>are</strong> of the responsibility for the successful outcome of the course, that<br />
should not be underestimated; a fact that should above all be actively and consciously emphasised<br />
to all participants at the beginning of the learning process.<br />
As an example of the <strong>AESAEC</strong> training concept’s innovative character and high degree of relevance<br />
to the target group (which is also confirmed by the Key Factor Collection) the following three<br />
approaches <strong>are</strong> emphasised:<br />
24
Authentic Location Learning, Multi-sensorial Learning and Learning by Doing<br />
III.2. Authentic Location Learning<br />
Learning at an authentic location is – as a deliberately applied methodology – still relatively new<br />
amongst general educational concepts. It is true that in the school and university sectors during the<br />
last few decades it has been forcibly encouraged. However as a rule its application has been limited<br />
to certain subjects and activities (e.g. including visiting museums for history or politics teaching,<br />
excursions for geography, visits abroad for learning foreign languages). The situation is somewhat<br />
more positively structured in vocational training and further education, in which learning and practical<br />
periods spent at places of work represent a traditionally fixed integrated component of c<strong>are</strong>er<br />
development.<br />
In general adult education however, Authentic Location Learning – with a few exceptions – is not<br />
widely applied at all, with the reasons for this varying considerably: they include participants having<br />
limited time, the significant amount of organisation required by educational providers in terms of<br />
preparation and implementation, the related high cost to course participants, the often low acceptance<br />
level of this form of learning amongst learners and teaching staff, but also due to the lack of<br />
interest shown by learning groups to spend time together outside of the educational establishment.<br />
In the <strong>AESAEC</strong> training concept there is a distinct aw<strong>are</strong>ness that every available meaningful opportunity<br />
should be used to leave the “usual” learning location (educational establishment or classroom),<br />
to convey learning subject matter and learning objectives. At the same time formal as well<br />
as informal learning activities can and should be moved to the following locations:<br />
museums, libraries, exhibitions, cultural events<br />
public discussions, seminars and lectures<br />
national and EU public institutions that <strong>are</strong> of relevance and interest<br />
other EU project groups, institutions or networks which may be relevant or of interest<br />
production units working with professional texts, marketing of products, projects etc. (e.g.<br />
newspapers, publishers, advertising agencies, project managers etc.)<br />
possibly restaurants and public houses with <strong>Europe</strong>an flair<br />
internet (much of the learning content – e.g. programme information, application and reporting<br />
forms etc. – <strong>are</strong> easily accessible via the internet, so the internet should be used<br />
actively and intensively as a virtual learning location.)<br />
These <strong>are</strong> just a few suggestions and ideas which have been taken into consideration by our training<br />
course and which can be expanded or completed depending on demand and opportunities. In addition<br />
it is important to ensure that Authentic Location Learning (as also with all other learning<br />
forms) is not implemented as a L’art pour l’art, but instead is deliberately embedded in the pedagogical<br />
concept and provides concrete learning results.<br />
25
III.3. Multi-sensory Learning<br />
Holistic learning is by no means a new approach in educational theory – just think of the principles<br />
of Johann Heinrich Pestalozzi or Maria Montessori. But ever since neurology first allowed us to understand<br />
how the human brain processes information and the resulting thought processes, we know<br />
that the absorption of information via the various sensory organs really does activate different functions<br />
of the brain. These collect, analyse, interpret and further process information, which usually<br />
flows into complex processes of memorising, thought and action.<br />
For educational theory the hypothesis is reinforced (and also repeatedly confirmed), that the more<br />
successful learning is the more brain functions <strong>are</strong> activated, because…<br />
the resulting linking of brain cells is greater<br />
the storing of information and skills occurs more intensively<br />
this information and these skills can be more easily retrieved or activated<br />
On the basis of our sensory organs the following sensory learning forms can be expressed as a rough<br />
summary:<br />
auditory learning (hearing, listening, discussing, talking etc.)<br />
visual / optical learning (reading, seeing, looking, observing etc.)<br />
haptic / kinaesthetic learning (touching, creating, moving, playing etc.)<br />
olfactory and gustatory learning (smelling, tasting)<br />
It is indisputable that the first two learning forms <strong>are</strong> put into use most of the time, but also haptic<br />
/ kinaesthetic learning is gaining in importance in many pedagogical <strong>are</strong>as. However, relatively little<br />
consideration has been given in the wider educational context – apart from in a few <strong>are</strong>as of<br />
vocational education – to the specific application of olfactory and gustatory learning. On the one<br />
hand this has a certain justification, but on the other hand it should not be completely disregarded<br />
with respect to the <strong>are</strong>as of sensitisation and association. Above all in terms of conveying intercultural<br />
subject matter smells and tastes can perfectly well be specifically applied. Thus preparing<br />
international dishes together as well as eating them together can offer a very fruitful learning ambience<br />
with great memory potential (which in a similar form was tested very successfully in company<br />
canteens as part of the EU project <strong>Europe</strong> at Work).<br />
It is therefore a central element of the <strong>AESAEC</strong> training concept to understand learning also with<br />
regard to the absorption of information and as complete a process as possible.<br />
26
Authentic Location Learning, Multi-sensorial Learning and Learning by Doing<br />
That is why methods and instruments <strong>are</strong> applied which correspond to the overall sensory attentiveness<br />
potential of the learners and which actively use learning potential.<br />
III.4. Learning by Doing<br />
Also learning by doing is a relatively old term in educational theory, which in this form was first<br />
introduced by the boy-scout founder Robert Baden-Powell, but on the other hand is based on older<br />
models of action-orientated learning (like for example from John Dewey). The concept of applied<br />
learning is regarded as being sufficiently well known, so that a comprehensive explanation of it<br />
does not seem necessary here. It is necessary however to highlight that <strong>AESAEC</strong> must be seen in its<br />
entirety, as an attempt to establish a sustainable Learning by doing concept. Thus the EU cofinanced<br />
project <strong>AESAEC</strong> is just the starting point for a long-term process. Through the project the<br />
course participants <strong>are</strong> sensitised and equipped so they can independently take part in EU projects,<br />
in order to experience a more active sense of <strong>Europe</strong>an citizenship, to contribute to the shaping of<br />
<strong>Europe</strong>an processes and to speak up for one’s own interests and needs. That the pedagogical concept<br />
of the course extensively uses elements of Learning-by-doing is only too logical and consistent.<br />
However the actual and long-term calculated effect of Learning-by-doing is felt, above all, towards<br />
the end or after the <strong>AESAEC</strong> course, when the participants have conceived and submitted their project<br />
proposals and in particular when these – in the case of a project being approved – can actually<br />
be implemented. It is then that the participants, through active Learning by doing, <strong>are</strong> fully capable<br />
to learn about the <strong>Europe</strong>an Union, EU funding mechanisms, EU project management, interculturalism,<br />
intercultural cooperation and problem-solving approaches. In addition they can further develop<br />
themselves but also their surroundings – and as a final consequence – the <strong>Europe</strong>an idea.<br />
Bibliography:<br />
Andersson, Sven/Andersson, Ingrid (2005): Authentic Learning in Social-cultural Frameworks. Taylor & Francis.<br />
Clark, Aldrich (2005): Learning by Doing: A Comprehensive Guide to Simulations, Computer Games, and Pedagogy in e-<br />
Learning and Other Educational Experiences. Pfeifer.<br />
Coffield F. et alii (2004): Learning styles in pedagogy in post-16 learning. A Systematic and Critical review. London. Learning<br />
and Skills Review Centre.<br />
Dörig, Roman (2003): Handlungsorientierter Unterricht - Ansätze, Kritik und Neuorientierung aus bildungstheoretischer,<br />
curricul<strong>are</strong>r und instruktionspsychologischer Perspektive. WiKu-Verlag.<br />
<strong>Europe</strong> at Work (2007): <strong>Europe</strong> Cooks at Work. ( www.europe-at-work.eu)<br />
Land Brandenburg/Ministerium für Bildung, Jugend und Sport (Hg.) (2005): Außerschulische Lernorte. LISUM.<br />
Lawrence, Gordon D. (1997): Looking at Type and Learning Styles. Center for Applications of Psychological Type.<br />
Lombardi, Marilyn (2007): Authentic Learning for the 21 st Century: An overview. EDUCAUSE.<br />
Montessori, Maria (2009) [1919]: The Montessori Method. Wilder Publications.<br />
Museum Nuremberg/Documentation Centre Nazi Party Rally Ground: Learning in Authentic Locations: The Education Forum.<br />
(http://museums.nuremberg.de/documentation-centre/education-programme.html)<br />
Niederhauser. Rolf/Rhyn, Heinz (2004): Lernen außerhalb der Schule. Das Projekt MatI – Marktplatz für außerschulisches<br />
Lernen. Haupt.<br />
Reyher, Uwe (Hg.) (1998): Lernen außerhalb des Klassenzimmers. Außerschulische Lernorte mit Erfahrungsberichten und<br />
praktischen Tipps. Oldenbourg Schulbuchverlag.<br />
Schiffler, Ludger (1998): Learning by Doing im Fremdsprachenunterricht. Max Hueber.<br />
Sliwka, Anne (2001): Das anglo-amerikanische Beispiel. Band 2. <strong>We</strong>inheim<br />
Vogt, Reinhold (2007): Gedächtnistraining in Frage & Antwort. Warum kreatives Denken besser ist als Pauken. Soft Skills<br />
kompakt. Junfermann.<br />
27
Part B: Learner’s Manual<br />
29
Module 1 – The <strong>Europe</strong>an Union and its Relevance for Senior Citizens<br />
Module 1:<br />
Dušana Findeisen (The Slovenian 3 rd Age University/SI)<br />
The <strong>Europe</strong>an Union and its Relevance for Senior<br />
Citizens<br />
Unit 1<br />
Unit in a nutshell<br />
Achievements<br />
Did you say <strong>Europe</strong>an Union Did you say older <strong>Europe</strong>an citizens<br />
Understanding the mission and functions of the <strong>Europe</strong>an Union and its<br />
integration processes<br />
<strong>Europe</strong>an institutions, their mission and how they relate to each other<br />
Demographic ageing and the ageing society in <strong>Europe</strong><br />
Older citizens’ major issues and how they <strong>are</strong> being approached by <strong>Europe</strong>an<br />
institutions<br />
Older citizens and who represents them at the <strong>Europe</strong>an level<br />
After this unit you will be able to:<br />
understand the gradual shaping of the idea of <strong>Europe</strong>an integration<br />
say what the most important institutions and advisory bodies of the EU<br />
<strong>are</strong>, what their missions and functions <strong>are</strong> and how they relate to each<br />
other.<br />
understand how <strong>Europe</strong>an and national legislation, dealing with senior<br />
citizens’ issues, relate to each other<br />
be aw<strong>are</strong> of demographic changes, the ageing society and active ageing,<br />
and how they interact with the major needs of older people<br />
become familiar with the key NGOs and <strong>Europe</strong>an networks representing<br />
older people and what they <strong>are</strong> doing for you.<br />
Older people’s satisfaction with life depends on how well they <strong>are</strong> integrated into society. (Theory<br />
of activity in old age, 1972)<br />
Warming up:<br />
The <strong>Europe</strong>an Union – What does it mean to you<br />
What is your personal experience of the EU Do you personally<br />
think it was a good idea to establish it in the first<br />
place and do think it is good idea that your country is part<br />
of it<br />
Please take a few minutes to reflect upon these questions<br />
and discuss your answers with others!<br />
Listen / Read<br />
1.1.1. Understanding the nature and role of the <strong>Europe</strong>an Union and its integration processes<br />
<strong>We</strong> would like to begin by saying that a significant number of <strong>Europe</strong>an citizens, be they young,<br />
middle aged or older, seem to have not quite a sufficient understanding of the mission and functions<br />
of the <strong>Europe</strong>an Union, its institutions, as well as an incomplete knowledge of the gradual<br />
building of <strong>Europe</strong>. This might be due to the fact that the “EU is an enterprise that was launched by<br />
closed circles and was constructed with little participation by <strong>Europe</strong>an citizens” 1 and that “the<br />
unification process indeed has until now been promoted mostly by the political elites” (Habermas,<br />
1 Jacques Delors, Les Controverses du progrès, 26 June 2009, France Culture.<br />
31
2009, 101). In spite of this, <strong>Europe</strong> is believed to be “a wonderfully successful and globally admired<br />
project, though too often it is regarded merely as a project and r<strong>are</strong>ly as an outcome” (Marcel<br />
Gauchet, idem), although in fact the results and outcomes <strong>are</strong> many, just as the aims of the <strong>Europe</strong>an<br />
Union <strong>are</strong> manifold. It is with this understanding that this <strong>AESAEC</strong> manual is designed to<br />
make readers, and particularly you, senior <strong>Europe</strong>an citizens, familiar with how and what has been<br />
achieved within EU, and what the results and outcomes have been, primarily in the <strong>are</strong>as that directly<br />
concern you.<br />
As planned, the EU has become a framework for numerous enriching cultural, social, economic and<br />
other transactions among its member states. It established a common currency and it has provided<br />
for common security. Nevertheless, it has also failed several times and in several ways. Thus,<br />
Jacques Delors, Marcel Gauchet, Cohn Bendit and others <strong>are</strong> convinced that <strong>Europe</strong> has failed in<br />
imposing itself as a political force and it has failed in imposing itself in the processes of globalisation.<br />
Moreover, member states do not truly understand that “union is a force” and that union means<br />
community, giving, as well as ensuring receiving. In order to receive member states should more<br />
willingly give up a part of their power. 2<br />
Nevertheless, in times of economic, financial, political and social crisis, the EU is believed to have a<br />
new chance, that is, the chance to tackle, democratically, issues of common and global interest,<br />
such as environmental issues, reversing the global trend of the market economy (Habermas, 2009,<br />
p.105) and demographic changes. These issues cannot be tackled in isolation, but on the contrary,<br />
they should become subject to large-scale public debate and real civil dialogue (Jacques Delors,<br />
idem). Nowadays most <strong>Europe</strong>an institutions and advisory bodies (<strong>Europe</strong>an Commission, <strong>Europe</strong>an<br />
Parliament, <strong>Europe</strong>an Economic and Social Council) act accordingly. “The development of a <strong>Europe</strong>an<br />
wide political public sphere - that is of a communicative network extending beyond the national<br />
borders and specialising in the relevant questions - is of central importance to the emergence<br />
of the <strong>Europe</strong>an identity, says Habermas (2009, p.87). It is time for <strong>Europe</strong> and its institutions to<br />
become an agora, a truly deliberative space, including the representatives of all its citizens. Members<br />
of the <strong>AESAEC</strong> project firmly believe that older citizens should be more present in the shaping<br />
of <strong>Europe</strong>an policies and in the decision making processes pertaining to them and their cooperation<br />
with other generations. The endeavours of the <strong>AESAEC</strong> project <strong>are</strong> consistent with Jaques Delors’<br />
argument that in the future, “the <strong>Europe</strong>an dynamics will be much more dependent on the contribution<br />
of the <strong>Europe</strong>an citizens than on the <strong>Europe</strong>an institutions”. (Jacques Delors, idem). For this<br />
purpose it is most important that <strong>Europe</strong>an citizens, including senior citizens, increase their knowledge<br />
about the <strong>Europe</strong>an Union, its institutions and its achievements.<br />
How theories of integration help us to understand the nature and the aims of the <strong>Europe</strong>an Union.<br />
Some prominent integration theories:<br />
In 1920 federalists argued that <strong>Europe</strong>an countries should form a natural entity and that they should<br />
never again enter into an inter-<strong>Europe</strong>an war. Altiero Spinelli decl<strong>are</strong>d that the nation states have<br />
lost their raison d’etre...<br />
Functionalists, like David Mitrany, rightly pointed out that international organisations <strong>are</strong> meant to<br />
address priorities dictated by human needs and therefore such organisations should modify their<br />
tasks and functions according to the needs of the moment. Such orientation is consistent with the<br />
fact that the <strong>Europe</strong>an Union has become so interested in old age, older people and older workers.<br />
Ageing represents a large demographic change which requires changes in the relationships between<br />
generations and also demands a different cultural model or organisation of ages. In addition to this,<br />
new policies <strong>are</strong> needed.<br />
The Transactionalist Theory, supported by Karl Deutsch, asserts that the sense of community among<br />
states would depend on the establishment of a network for mutual transactions. Networks can be<br />
seen everywhere. Framework programmes and structural funds <strong>are</strong> there to support networking,<br />
32<br />
2 German citizens were at one time against the Euro, but Helmut Kohl persuaded them that the Euro was good for everybody<br />
in <strong>Europe</strong>, and consequently they accepted it.
Module 1 – The <strong>Europe</strong>an Union and its Relevance for Senior Citizens<br />
projects, etc. Have you ever heard of Leonardo da Vinci, Grundtvig, Erasmus, Comenius and other<br />
programmes They offer frameworks within which <strong>Europe</strong>an projects as well as transactions and<br />
mutual cultural, social, economic and political exchange and mutual recognition <strong>are</strong> possible.<br />
The Nonfictional Theory, developed by Ernst Haas and Jean Monet, involves common action leading<br />
to a cohesive society. Robert Schumann said on 9 May 1950: “<strong>Europe</strong> will be built by concrete<br />
achievements which create a de facto solidarity”.<br />
Economic integration was intended to gradually build solidarity amongst the participating nations<br />
and would in turn create a need for supranational institutional laws. Later on this would lead to the<br />
need for an effective supranational structure. This theory makes us think of the “customary law”<br />
that was often created spontaneously and applied in the development of towns. Laws were not imposed<br />
on the inhabitants; rather they were a codification of the generally accepted ways of living<br />
together in a town.<br />
The integration processes step by step<br />
If we wanted to give more sense to <strong>Europe</strong>, we should first ask ourselves what <strong>Europe</strong> has become<br />
over the four stages of its integration: Customs Union, Common Market, Economic and Monetary<br />
Union and Towards Political Union. In fact, in order to understand the <strong>Europe</strong>an Union, we should<br />
not forget its past. <strong>Europe</strong> was established under much different conditions than exist today; the<br />
<strong>Europe</strong> of six member states in the early 1950s and the <strong>Europe</strong> of 27 member states in 2009 <strong>are</strong> two<br />
completely different entities.<br />
The construction of modern <strong>Europe</strong> began after the Second World War. In 1945 Winston Churchill<br />
described <strong>Europe</strong> as “a breeding ground for pestilence and hate” and a year later, as a remedy to<br />
this state, he proposed to “recreate the <strong>Europe</strong>an family and to provide it with a structure within<br />
which it can dwell in peace, safety and freedom.” Safety and freedom were the reasons why the EU<br />
was created. The successful formula was the integration of the former antagonistic nation states<br />
into a union of peacefully interacting and competing nations. In his famous appeal, Robert Schuman<br />
recognised that only a lasting reconciliation with Germany could form the basis for a united <strong>Europe</strong><br />
and he pleaded that <strong>Europe</strong> should pardon Germany, though not forget what had taken place, which<br />
at that time was a difficult thing to ask for.<br />
The process of <strong>Europe</strong>an integration has been ongoing since 1950<br />
based on the construction method taught by Jean Monnet and<br />
Robert Schuman; building <strong>Europe</strong> brick by brick, with each step<br />
being taken after c<strong>are</strong>ful evaluation.<br />
Jean Monnet contributed to the creation of the binding formula.<br />
This formula consists of creating numerous links between the nation<br />
states; common laws, policies and institutions, common <strong>Europe</strong>an<br />
method governing the member states’ economic activities that<br />
then should influence the day to day lives of <strong>Europe</strong>an citizens.<br />
Robert Schumann<br />
At the beginning the objective was for the EU to become a political<br />
structure. However this intention has failed and instead of being a<br />
strong political force <strong>Europe</strong> has became more interested in its<br />
economic power. (Jacques Delores, Les Controversies du progrès,<br />
26 th June, 2009, France Culture.)<br />
To join the <strong>Europe</strong>an Union, a state must fulfil certain economic and political conditions, called the<br />
Copenhagen Criteria (after the Copenhagen Summit in June 1993). These state that a candidate<br />
country must be a democracy, it should have a free market and should be willing to adopt the entire<br />
body of laws that the <strong>Europe</strong>an Union has already adopted. According to the Maastricht Treaty,<br />
each current member state and the <strong>Europe</strong>an Parliament must agree to any enlargement.<br />
33
Important events, dates and facts<br />
1950-52: Based on the so called Schuman Plan, the <strong>Europe</strong>an Coal and Steel<br />
Community (ECSC) was founded to ensure joint control over coal and<br />
steel production, the two most important <strong>are</strong>as in the armaments industry.<br />
One of the main reasons for its foundation was to prevent a country<br />
preparing for a new war by having common control of these <strong>are</strong>as of production.<br />
France, <strong>We</strong>st Germany, Belgium, Luxembourg, the Netherlands<br />
were the founding members of this Community. In 1952 Italy joined and<br />
the six countries all signed the Treaty of Paris (23 July 1952).<br />
1957: With the Treaty of Rome, the ECSC developed into the <strong>Europe</strong>an Economic Community (EEC),<br />
providing <strong>Europe</strong>'s first real common <strong>Europe</strong>an market.<br />
1973: The United Kingdom, Republic of Ireland and Denmark joined the EEC.<br />
1980-1986: Greece (1980) as well as Spain and Portugal (both 1986) became new members.<br />
1990: With the reunifciation of the two Germanies the former Deutsche Demokratische Republik<br />
(DDR) / German Democratic Republic (GDR) also became part of the Community.<br />
1993: By virtue of the Maastricht Treaty the EEC turned into the <strong>Europe</strong>an Union and due to general<br />
economic, political and social developments related to the end of Cold War tensions, some<br />
EFTA (<strong>Europe</strong>an Free Trade Association) states and even countries from the former COM-<br />
ECON (Council for Mutual Economic Assistance) also became interested in obtaining full EU<br />
membership. The <strong>Europe</strong>an Union then entered into a very dynamic period of enlargement,<br />
more than doubling the number of its member states over the following 14 years. This<br />
caused Hans-Dietrich Genscher, former German Foreign Minister, to say that “the nicest<br />
achievement of the <strong>Europe</strong>an Union is its enlargement”.<br />
1995: The former EFTA countries Austria, Finland and Sweden joined the EU.<br />
2004: Malta and the Republic of Cyprus (i.e. the southern, Greek part of the island), former COM-<br />
ECON members, the Czech Repubic, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia, the former parts of the<br />
Soviet Union Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, and, last but not least, Slovenia, a Yugoslavian republic,<br />
all became new member states.<br />
2007: With the entry of Bulgaria and Romania the list of the 27 member states of the EU was completed.<br />
However, the enlargement process of the <strong>Europe</strong>an Union must not be seen as finished. Currently<br />
official accession negotiations <strong>are</strong> in progress with Croatia, Macedonia and Turkey, and discussions<br />
with other countries in the western Balkans may soon follow.<br />
Treaties and Strategies<br />
Treaties <strong>are</strong> the primary source of <strong>Europe</strong>an law and they <strong>are</strong> also the legal basis for common policies.<br />
<strong>All</strong> policies relating to older people <strong>are</strong> thus dependent on the treaties, these being instruments<br />
of progressing <strong>Europe</strong>an integration. Some of them you have already read about above, however<br />
below is a summary of the most important treaties in the EU’s history:<br />
The Treaty of Paris (1951) establishing the <strong>Europe</strong>an Coal and Steel Community (ECSC). Its main<br />
objectives were to eliminate various barriers to trade and to guarantee peace and safety in<br />
<strong>Europe</strong>.<br />
34
Module 1 – The <strong>Europe</strong>an Union and its Relevance for Senior Citizens<br />
Treaty of Rome (1957) establishing the <strong>Europe</strong>an Economic Community (EEC).<br />
The main aim of this treaty was the creation of a common market between<br />
the member states. It introduced the free flow of capital and<br />
workers between members.<br />
The Treaty of Maastricht (1992) was a major step in the development of the<br />
<strong>Europe</strong>an Community. It created the <strong>Europe</strong>an Union and led to the creation of the Euro. The<br />
treaty created what is commonly referred to as the pillar structure of the <strong>Europe</strong>an Union.<br />
This concept of the Union divides it into the <strong>Europe</strong>an Community (EC) pillar, the Common<br />
Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) pillar, and the Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) pillar. The<br />
latter two pillars <strong>are</strong> intergovernmental policy <strong>are</strong>as, whereby the greater power lies with the<br />
member states, whilst with the <strong>Europe</strong>an Community pillar the Union's supranational<br />
institutions — the <strong>Europe</strong>an Commission, the <strong>Europe</strong>an Parliament and the <strong>Europe</strong>an Court of<br />
Justice — hold most of the power. <strong>All</strong> three pillars combined together <strong>are</strong> called the <strong>Europe</strong>an<br />
Union.<br />
The Treaty of Amsterdam (1997) meant a greater emphasis on citizenship and the rights of<br />
individuals. It sought to achieve more democracy in the shape of increased powers for the<br />
<strong>Europe</strong>an Parliament, a new approach to issues of employment, a more integrated community<br />
in terms of freedom of movement, security and justice, the beginnings of a cohesive<br />
Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) and the reform of EU institutions in the run up to<br />
enlargement.<br />
The Treaty of Nice (2001) reformed the institutional structure of the <strong>Europe</strong>an Union to withstand<br />
eastward expansion. The Amsterdam Treaty was originally intended to have tackled this aim;<br />
however it failed to do so at that time. There was doubt for a time whether the treaty would<br />
be brought into force after its initial rejection by Irish voters in a June 2001 referendum. This<br />
referendum result was reversed in a subsequent referendum held a little over a year later.<br />
The Draft Constitutional Treaty (Rome 2004) was intended to establish a Constitution for <strong>Europe</strong><br />
and was signed by 53 senior political figures from the 25 EU member states. In most cases<br />
heads of state designated plenipotentiaries to sign the treaty, however some presidents also<br />
signed on behalf of countries which hold the status of a republic.<br />
The Reform Treaty of Lisbon (2007). Changes included more qualified majority voting in the Council<br />
of Ministers, increased involvement of the <strong>Europe</strong>an Parliament in the legislative process<br />
through extended co-decision making with the Council of Ministers, eliminating the pillar<br />
system and the creation of a President of the <strong>Europe</strong>an Council with a term of office of two<br />
and half years and a High Representative for Foreign Affairs to present a united position on<br />
EU policies. If ratified, the Treaty of Lisbon would also make the Union's human rights<br />
charter, the Charter of Fundamental Rights, legally binding. 3<br />
The Lisbon Strategy is, apart from the treaties, also a highly important concept in connection with<br />
the objectives and aims of the <strong>AESAEC</strong> training course. Due to its importance it needs to be<br />
considered by senior citizens, when preparing a <strong>Europe</strong>an project proposal. The strategy was<br />
set out by the <strong>Europe</strong>an Council in Lisbon in 2000 and is also known as the Lisbon Agenda or<br />
Lisbon Process. It is an action and development plan for the EU, important for all social<br />
groups, older citizens included. Its aim is to make the EU "the most dynamic and competitive<br />
knowledge-based economy in the world by 2010, capable of sustainable economic growth with<br />
more and better jobs and greater social cohesion, and with respect for the environment".<br />
Now, one year away from 2010, we know that this plan was much too ambitious to be fully<br />
implemented successfully. However, it has produced some success and good results in the<br />
fields of education and lifelong learning, in the general development of EU citizenship, in<br />
economic growth and in job creation within the EU. In respect of the four pillars of the Lisbon<br />
Strategy, the focus is now as follows:<br />
• member states should strive to adopt measures to promote creativity and enterprise with<br />
a view to making <strong>Europe</strong> the most creative environment in the world<br />
3 During the development of this course book (November 2009), the Czech Republic, as the last of the 27 EU member states,<br />
signed the Reform Treaty of Lisbon, which means the treaty will now come into force.<br />
35
• <strong>Europe</strong>’s economic and social development should centre upon its cultural heritage and<br />
richness<br />
• investment in human resources and framework measures to ensure flexisecurity <strong>are</strong> of crucial<br />
importance to <strong>Europe</strong><br />
• environmental policy should be highlighted as a key force driving innovation and economic<br />
growth.<br />
The fundamental objective of the <strong>Europe</strong>an Union is the strengthening of economic and social cohesion.<br />
The <strong>Europe</strong>an Union is aiming at reducing the disparities between different regions. The Structural<br />
Funds play a major role here, including the <strong>Europe</strong>an Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and<br />
the <strong>Europe</strong>an Social Fund (ESF).<br />
1.1.2. <strong>Europe</strong>an institutions, their mission and how they relate to each other<br />
The <strong>Europe</strong>an Union has institutions which <strong>are</strong> not easily understood by the majority of EU citizens.<br />
There is a division of responsibilities between the <strong>Europe</strong>an and national levels, and thus division<br />
itself is a political decision. The fact that <strong>Europe</strong>an institutions have been granted the power to<br />
take decisions, calls for “technical” solutions at the <strong>Europe</strong>an level. Therefore we can assume that<br />
these technical solutions <strong>are</strong> also political in nature. Nation states can regain some of their lost<br />
regulatory power if they harmonise their taxation and economic policies, as well as social policies at<br />
the <strong>Europe</strong>an level. After taking this step they can again make decisions at the national level.”<br />
(Habermas, 2009, pp. 83-84)<br />
There <strong>are</strong> two truly <strong>Europe</strong>an institutions concerned with <strong>Europe</strong> on a daily basis, the <strong>Europe</strong>an<br />
Commission and the <strong>Europe</strong>an Parliament. But there <strong>are</strong> also other <strong>Europe</strong>an institutions, such as<br />
the Council of Ministers and the <strong>Europe</strong>an Court of Justice.<br />
<strong>Europe</strong>an Commission (EC)<br />
The <strong>Europe</strong>an Commission is commonly referred to as the Commission. Each state, after having<br />
acceded to the EU, has one of its nationals acting as a <strong>Europe</strong>an Commissioner, which means at the<br />
moment there <strong>are</strong> 27 commissioners. The President of the Commission is nominated by the Heads of<br />
State or Government, and the nomination must be then approved by the <strong>Europe</strong>an Parliament.<br />
The Commission is the driving force behind <strong>Europe</strong>an<br />
integration. Its ability to act is important for the development<br />
of common policies and thus for the integration<br />
processes. The Commission defines common interest in<br />
each policy and prep<strong>are</strong>s amendments to proposals. The<br />
Commission is also the guardian of the treaties and the<br />
“acquis communautaire”, that is of all Community Legislation.<br />
It ensures fulfilment of obligations by the<br />
member states.<br />
In the Draft Constitutional Treaty it is stated that the Commission shall ensure the application of<br />
the Constitution (Moussis, 2008. pp. 40-43). The Commission is also the executive body and plays an<br />
administrative role. In addition, the Commission has a representative role, representing the EU in<br />
third countries. The <strong>Europe</strong>an Commission regularly seeks the views of citizens and stakeholders<br />
when it develops policy and legislation. It launches open consultations in the <strong>are</strong>as of employment,<br />
social affairs and equal opportunities. Anyone interested in a complete overview of public consultations<br />
launched by the <strong>Europe</strong>an Commission can consult Your Voice in <strong>Europe</strong><br />
(www.europeanvoice.com) on the Commission’s website. Any <strong>Europe</strong>an citizen or organisation can<br />
participate in discussion forums on a wide range of issues on the Debate <strong>Europe</strong> platform<br />
36
Module 1 – The <strong>Europe</strong>an Union and its Relevance for Senior Citizens<br />
(http://europa.eu/debateeurop). Older citizens preparing a project proposal can gain inspiration by<br />
consulting this website.<br />
The <strong>Europe</strong>an Parliament<br />
After the last enlargement in 2004, the number of seats in the <strong>Europe</strong>an Parliament was increased<br />
to 732. Of these 99 <strong>are</strong> allocated to Germany as the country with the largest population and five to<br />
Malta as the smallest EU country. The MEPs <strong>are</strong> elected directly by the peoples of <strong>Europe</strong>. Senior<br />
and other citizens can therefore approach them with their questions and appeals. The Parliament<br />
exercises four functions: legislative, political, supervisory and budgetary.<br />
The Parliament can give approval with regard to the concluding<br />
of international agreements. It participates in the adoption of<br />
Community Acts, and politically it represents more than 450 million<br />
citizens. It monitors the Commission’s activity and is required<br />
to agree to any major budgetary decisions.<br />
The <strong>Europe</strong>an Parliament also appoints an Ombudsman<br />
(http://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/start.faces) empowered to<br />
receive complaints from <strong>Europe</strong>an citizens with respect to poor<br />
administration and performance by the Community, and it leads<br />
on the Intergroup on Ageing (www.age-platform.org), whose<br />
activities <strong>are</strong> very relevant to older citizens.<br />
The Council of Ministers<br />
The Council of Ministers, or simply the Council, is<br />
composed of a ministerial level representative from<br />
each member state who is authorised to commit the<br />
government of that member state. It is composed of<br />
nine configurations which each focus on a number of<br />
related <strong>are</strong>as. These include general affairs and external<br />
relations, economic and financial affairs, and<br />
health and social matters. Currently the Council’s<br />
Presidency rotates every six months and thus each<br />
member state has the opportunity to prove its efficiency<br />
in promoting common policies.<br />
The <strong>Europe</strong>an Court of Justice (ECJ)<br />
The Court of Justice (often called <strong>Europe</strong>an Court of Justice) consists of one judge<br />
per member state sitting in its chambers. The common rules adopted by the decision<br />
making bodies may be interpreted differently from one country to another if<br />
only national courts were to control decision-making. The main task of the Court<br />
of Justice is to clarify ambiguous legal provisions. For example, recently Age Concern,<br />
the largest British older people’s charity (www.ageconcern.org.uk) backed<br />
the Heyday Case challenging the mandatory retirement age. This case has been<br />
referred to the <strong>Europe</strong>an Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling<br />
Heyday and Age Concern <strong>are</strong> confident that the new rules breach the requirements of the <strong>Europe</strong>an<br />
Directive on Employment because they leave people over 65 without the right to choose to continue<br />
working and enable employers to refuse to recruit anyone over the age of 65. More and more employers<br />
<strong>are</strong> using the new regulations to force out people over 65‚ knowing that they cannot be ac-<br />
37
cused of unlawful discrimination. Older citizens, preparing a <strong>Europe</strong>an project proposal, could gain<br />
inspiration by studying the different cases brought to court on the grounds of age discrimination.<br />
The Economic and Social Committee (EESC)<br />
The Economic and Social Committee (EESC) takes into account<br />
the interests of various economic and social groups. Its members<br />
<strong>are</strong> proposed by the member states’ governments and <strong>are</strong> appointed<br />
for a term of four years by the Council .They divide into<br />
the Employers’ Group (employers, bankers, federations etc.) the<br />
Workers’ Group (trade unions etc.) and Various Interest Groups<br />
(representatives of agriculture, small and medium sized enterprises,<br />
the professions, consumer organisations, families, older<br />
people etc.). The Committee must be consulted by the Council<br />
and the Commission in certain <strong>are</strong>as.<br />
The Committee of the Regions<br />
The Importance of the regions and the role they play in the Governance<br />
of the EU was recognised in the treaty establishing the <strong>Europe</strong>an Community.<br />
This Committee consists of representatives from regional and<br />
local bodies. It must be consulted by the Council or the Commission on<br />
matters like employment guidelines, legislation on social matters, the<br />
environment, education, vocational training, culture, public health and<br />
all other important matters such as cross-border cooperation.<br />
Reflection / Discuss<br />
You may have thought that what you already knew about <strong>Europe</strong> was quite enough. You may have<br />
had some idea about how <strong>Europe</strong> has become integrated. Probably you had heard about some of the<br />
treaties and strategies, but now you know to what extent and why they have become important<br />
milestones in <strong>Europe</strong>an Union history and also how they ultimately relate to older citizens.<br />
Although based on the principles of the French Revolution – liberty, equality, fraternity – the <strong>Europe</strong>an<br />
Union is not a revolutionary enterprise but it is an intellectual enterprise as much as it is a<br />
practical reality. Knowing a little bit more about the <strong>Europe</strong>an Union, its principles, history, current<br />
structural developments and mission, it is as important as understanding the identity and the<br />
aims of your own country.<br />
The <strong>Europe</strong>an Union and your country <strong>are</strong> closely related and you <strong>are</strong> <strong>Europe</strong>an citizens as much as<br />
you <strong>are</strong> citizens of your own country. Within this framework it is b<strong>are</strong>ly conceivable to think that<br />
<strong>Europe</strong>an institutions <strong>are</strong> of no concern to <strong>Europe</strong>an citizens, because they simply <strong>are</strong>! More than<br />
70% of your national legislation comes from <strong>Europe</strong>, whether it concerns maximum working hours,<br />
the food you eat, the air you breathe or the age when you can retire.<br />
And do you know who decides all these issues It is not the anonymous bureaucrats in Brussels, but<br />
increasingly it is the <strong>Europe</strong>an Parliament that makes decisions, the men and women who you elect.<br />
Together with your ministers, heads of state or government they take decisions affecting your everyday<br />
life, whether you <strong>are</strong> young or old, producer or consumer, or living in the North, South, East<br />
or <strong>We</strong>st of the Community. Often we complain that <strong>Europe</strong> is distant from its citizens - but is it<br />
38
Module 1 – The <strong>Europe</strong>an Union and its Relevance for Senior Citizens<br />
really Is it not much closer and more transp<strong>are</strong>nt than we all think, and does it not c<strong>are</strong> very much<br />
about issues relating to all <strong>Europe</strong>an citizens, including issues affecting older ones<br />
Please discuss these issues, including all relevant pros and cons, as well as your points of view before<br />
and after this unit.<br />
Listen / Read<br />
1.1.3. Demographic changes and the ageing society<br />
The ageing society is one of the major current demographic changes. The other changes <strong>are</strong> shrinking<br />
populations, the ageing workforce and migration.<br />
When we think about ageing, we think about it principally as individual ageing, not as demographic<br />
ageing. Demographic ageing is a rather new phenomenon which first appe<strong>are</strong>d in the second half of<br />
the 20th Century. Despite the progress achieved in all <strong>are</strong>as, human life is not any longer than in<br />
previous times, however the number of people over the age of 65 is increasing considerably and<br />
deaths <strong>are</strong> outnumbering births. Ever more people reach an advanced old age and at the same time<br />
the rate of fertility is reducing in some <strong>Europe</strong>an regions due to a number of reasons, migration<br />
being one of them. Population is ageing and our societies <strong>are</strong> ageing. <strong>We</strong> live in an ageing society.<br />
Of course, on the one hand this is a threat, but it is also a huge change. Any kind of change requires<br />
adaptation. This brings about the need to promote a cultural change in attitudes towards older people<br />
and old age, a change in the position of older people in society and the need to modify policies<br />
that determine the relationships between generations and that meet the needs of different generations.<br />
The members of the <strong>AESAEC</strong> project group believe that enhancing intergenerational solidarity and<br />
cooperation is key in reacting constructively to today’s rapidly evolving social and demographic<br />
context. Changes in the age structure of our populations will have a significant impact on the dynamics<br />
among generations, and intergenerational solidarity and cooperation will need to be reinvented<br />
and sustained by appropriate policies. A more inclusive approach to people of all ages<br />
therefore needs to be developed and actively promoted in all <strong>are</strong>as of social and economic policy.<br />
More positive attitudes and expectations in respect of older citizens’ contributions need to be cultivated<br />
and ageist assumptions must be challenged and not tolerated. People of all ages have a vital<br />
role to play in contributing to society and their experience, knowledge and vitality <strong>are</strong> needed to<br />
build a stronger <strong>Europe</strong>. It is essential to develop targeted and well coordinated policies which capitalise<br />
on the strong potential of older people to contribute.<br />
In the ageing society much greater participation by younger and older generations is needed. In<br />
addition policies and strategies as well as action plans serving this end <strong>are</strong> needed. Moreover, <strong>Europe</strong>an<br />
projects can, especially when launched by senior citizens, highlight these issues and can propose<br />
ways to achieve greater participation by all generations in society.<br />
Major older people’s issues and how they <strong>are</strong> being approached by <strong>Europe</strong>an policies<br />
Older people’s needs and issues <strong>are</strong> addressed by different policies adopted on the basis of the<br />
<strong>Europe</strong>an Treaties. However progressive they may be, they <strong>are</strong> often governed by a significant<br />
number of negative or positive stereotypes about older people. In our view this is mostly due to the<br />
fact that older people <strong>are</strong> approached mostly in terms of their age and not in terms of their involvement,<br />
potential, situation etc. What is important <strong>are</strong> their differences. The least important<br />
seems to be their age!<br />
However people in later life – according to some definitions this already begins at around the age of<br />
45 - <strong>are</strong> a large group of extremely heterogeneous people. Consequently, an in-depth knowledge of<br />
the diversity of older people, of their needs and potential is needed before setting a policy or even<br />
a <strong>Europe</strong>an project.<br />
39
The issues of older people <strong>are</strong> connected to the way of life that society allows or enables older<br />
people to have. Older people’s needs <strong>are</strong> social, emotional, cognitive and involve the need for sharing<br />
values. Their needs <strong>are</strong> psycho-social, just as with all individuals regardless of their age. The<br />
needs of older people should be met by policies.<br />
The issues of older people also involve the numerous stereotypes about them and old age that <strong>are</strong><br />
to be found everywhere, such as with regard to policies, treatment by professionals and voluntary<br />
working. Stereotypes do not only affect older people, as they also affect everyone dealing with<br />
issues relating to older people, such as professionals, politicians, researchers etc. The best thing<br />
would be to ban these stereotypes - which is an easy thing to say but a very difficult thing to<br />
achieve.<br />
Older people’s needs should be taken into account by <strong>Europe</strong>an projects and should be satisfied at<br />
all levels within society; this includes at the level of their relationships with a partner, children, coworkers,<br />
co-students, co-volunteers, at the local community level, at the level of the municipality,<br />
at the regional level, at the state level and at the EU level. <strong>All</strong> levels <strong>are</strong> important when seeking to<br />
act upon issues that concern older people. The issues of older people <strong>are</strong> related to their untapped<br />
and unrecognised human capital (abilities, knowledge, skills), to the lack of social capital (not<br />
enough institutions, associations, etc), to the insufficient support of active ageing, to integration<br />
into society, to social protection, to eradicating poverty, to stimulating them volunteering and to<br />
active citizenship.<br />
The issues of older people <strong>are</strong> connected with the lack of justice and the inequality (discrimination)<br />
faced by older people and retired people, be it legally, culturally, socially, economically or politically<br />
based - with older people not being allowed or stimulated to take part in decision making<br />
processes at all levels.<br />
In order to identify the issues of older people, one must first identify sources in society that <strong>are</strong><br />
available to the generations in the middle, and secondly, a number of questions need to be asked:<br />
do older people have equal access to work, culture, education, health, transport, housing, science<br />
and active citizenship Do they have the right to go on working after their retirement without being<br />
penalised Do older people have equal access to the media and do they appear in the media Are<br />
there discounts offered to older people solely on the basis of their age, pushing them in the end to<br />
appreciate being supported and slowly abandoning their right to play an equal role in public matters<br />
The direction of local, national and EU policies regarding older people is often one that promotes<br />
weakness and dependency and this should be changed! EU treaties and common policies as well as<br />
numerous documents address older people’s issues. Senior citizens launching a <strong>Europe</strong>an project<br />
should be knowledgeable about the contents and the aims of the EU treaties and the common policies,<br />
as well as about many of the documents that address older people’s issues in a direct or indirect<br />
way.<br />
Employment and Discrimination<br />
At the Amsterdam <strong>Europe</strong>an Council heads of state or government of the member states accepted<br />
Article 13 of the Amsterdam Treaty against discrimination - and promoting social inclusion - in all<br />
its forms. This article is further related to the EU Race Directive, the EU Employment Equality Directive<br />
and the Gender Equality Instruments - all these documents <strong>are</strong> related also to older people.<br />
Discrimination can be visible or invisible. This issue is being tackled also by a number<br />
of organisations supported by the <strong>Europe</strong>an Commission. Visiting their web<br />
pages older citizens can learn much about the subject and also about the related<br />
policies and documents:<br />
• AGE (The <strong>Europe</strong>an Older People’s Platform): http://www.age-platform.org<br />
• ENAR (<strong>Europe</strong>an Network Against Racism): http://www.enar-eu.org<br />
40
Module 1 – The <strong>Europe</strong>an Union and its Relevance for Senior Citizens<br />
• EDF (<strong>Europe</strong>an Disability Forum): http://www.edf-feph.org<br />
Additionally, social inclusion of vulnerable groups is being promoted at the <strong>Europe</strong>an level by:<br />
• Caritas Europa: http://www.caritas-europa.org/code/en/default.asp<br />
• CECOP (<strong>Europe</strong>an Confederation of Workers' Cooperatives, Social Cooperatives and Social<br />
and Participative Enterprises): http://www.cecop.coop<br />
• COFACE (Confederation of Family Organisations in the <strong>Europe</strong>an Union):<br />
http://www.coface-eu.org<br />
• EAPN (<strong>Europe</strong>an Anti Poverty Network): http://www.eapn.org<br />
• EMN (<strong>Europe</strong>an Microfinance Network): http://www.europeanmicrofinance.org/index2_en.php<br />
• ESN (<strong>Europe</strong>an Social Network): http://www.esn-eu.org<br />
• <strong>Europe</strong>an Women's Lobby: http://www.womenlobby.org<br />
Intergenerational solidarity<br />
Technology can also help older people to carry out daily activities as well as to monitor health, create<br />
social networks, learn and study. It can further increase their participation in society and augment<br />
their safety. It enables older people to participate in the e-economy, e-government, e-<br />
communication, and to benefit from e-health and e-learning. The use of technology can also facilitate<br />
social inclusion, improve professional participation and quality of life and ultimately enhance<br />
independent living. The use of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) to help older<br />
people and people with disabilities to continue to live at home is commonly known as Ambient Assisted<br />
Living (AAL).<br />
Active <strong>Europe</strong>an Citizenship<br />
Education for Active Citizenship is a lifelong process. One cannot become an active citizen “just like<br />
that”, when one grows old. Policies <strong>are</strong> needed to support older people’s potential for volunteering<br />
and to prevent discrimination on the grounds of age in this field. AGE publications on senior volunteering,<br />
that might help you in preparing a <strong>Europe</strong>an project proposal, <strong>are</strong> given on the AGE Leaflet<br />
on Promoting Volunteering for <strong>Europe</strong>’s Seniors (http://www.age-platform.org).<br />
1.1.4. Older citizens and who represents them at the <strong>Europe</strong>an level<br />
The institutional level<br />
The issues of older citizens <strong>are</strong> being addressed through the endeavours of various <strong>Europe</strong>an Institutions,<br />
mainly by the <strong>Europe</strong>an Commission and the <strong>Europe</strong>an Parliament.<br />
The <strong>Europe</strong>an Commission (EC)<br />
The EC seeks public opinion on the issues through promoting public debate, peer reviews, consultations,<br />
thematic conferences etc, and prep<strong>are</strong>s proposals in the field of social policy that concern<br />
older citizens (employment, social security, volunteering etc.).<br />
Intergroup on Ageing<br />
This is a group within the <strong>Europe</strong>an Parliament and unites MEPs from different committees and sectors<br />
who <strong>are</strong> willing to discuss this particular issue. The Intergroup issues statements directed at the<br />
41
<strong>Europe</strong>an Council and other EU institutions. The Intergroup is convinced that social protection and<br />
employment policies must be linked, that the EU has a key role to play in bringing about reform of<br />
pension systems in order to ensure decent pensions for all, giving people a fair sh<strong>are</strong> of society’s<br />
economic prosperity and not just preventing outright poverty. Countries need to provide secure,<br />
universal and fully adequate first pillar pensions. It is also necessary to adopt reforms to allow and<br />
encourage older people to keep working.<br />
The NGO level<br />
AGE (www.age-platform.org), the <strong>Europe</strong>an Older People's Platform, is a <strong>Europe</strong>an network of<br />
around 150 organisations working on behalf of people aged 50+, which directly represent over 28<br />
million older people in <strong>Europe</strong>. AGE aims to voice and promote the interests of the 150 million people<br />
aged 50+ in the <strong>Europe</strong>an Union and to raise aw<strong>are</strong>ness of the issues that concern them most.<br />
AGE also aims to give a voice to older and retired people in EU policy debates through the active<br />
participation of their representative organisations at EU, national, regional and local levels, so as to<br />
input into EU policy development. AGE’s work focuses on a wide range of policy <strong>are</strong>as that impact<br />
on older and retired people. These include issues of anti-discrimination, employment of older<br />
workers and active ageing, social protection, pension reforms, social inclusion, health, research,<br />
accessibility of public transport and of the built environment, lifelong learning and ICT.<br />
There <strong>are</strong> other important NGO’s at this level, some of which specialise in the issues of older<br />
people, and some of them that deal with relevant issues as a part of their particular field of<br />
activity. Many also play an important international role in the field of research. Below is a selection<br />
of some of the more important and relevant NGOs:<br />
• C<strong>are</strong> (Christian Action Research & Education for <strong>Europe</strong>): http://www.c<strong>are</strong>foreurope.org/<br />
• CEV (<strong>Europe</strong>an Volunteer Centre): http://www.cev.be/<br />
• COFACE (Confédération des Organisations Familiales de l'Union Européenne):<br />
http://www.coface-eu.org/<br />
• CCRE (Council of <strong>Europe</strong>an Municipalities and Regions): http://www.ccre.org/<br />
• EUROCADRES (Council of <strong>Europe</strong>an Professional and Managerial Staff):<br />
http://www.eurocadres.org/<br />
• Euroc<strong>are</strong>rs (<strong>Europe</strong>an Association Working for C<strong>are</strong>rs): http://www.euroc<strong>are</strong>rs.org/<br />
• Euro Cities: http://www.eurocities.eu/main.php<br />
• Euro Health Net: http://www.eurohealthnet.eu/<br />
• <strong>Europe</strong>an Association for Population Studies: http://www.eaps.nl/<br />
• <strong>Europe</strong>an Federation for Retirement Provision: http://www.efrp.org/<br />
• <strong>Europe</strong>an Association of Service Providers for Persons with Disabilities:<br />
http://www.easpd.eu/<br />
• EURAG (<strong>Europe</strong>an Federation of Older Persons): http://www.easpd.eu/<br />
• <strong>Europe</strong>an University: http://www.euruni.edu/Scripts/Index.aspxidz=2<br />
• FAFCE (Föderation der Katholischen Familienverbande in Europa):<br />
http://www.family-eu.org/cms/index.php<br />
• IPSE (Institut de la Protection Sociale Européenne) :<br />
http://www.idies.org/index.phppost/Linstitut-de-la-protection-sociale-europeenne-IPSE<br />
• Youth Forum Jeunesse : http://www.youthforum.org/<br />
Since 2000 social policy has occupied a much more prominent place in the overall agenda of the EU.<br />
After the adoption of the Lisbon Strategy by heads of state or government, a new goal was formulated<br />
which stated that economic and social policies should go hand in hand. As a result an ambitious<br />
social agenda was formulated, which sets out the social priorities - the Open Method of Coordination-<br />
which promotes stronger co-operation and co-ordination between member states on different<br />
social issues. This method applies to the <strong>are</strong>as of employment, social protection (pensions),<br />
social inclusion and education.<br />
There <strong>are</strong> currently a number of key demographic changes to consider, such as the shrinking total<br />
<strong>Europe</strong>an population, processes affecting migration and, above all, demographic ageing. When talking<br />
about ageing we often have individual ageing in mind, and not the ageing of our societies and of<br />
the population. The ageing of the population, or demographic ageing, is however an achievement<br />
42
Module 1 – The <strong>Europe</strong>an Union and its Relevance for Senior Citizens<br />
of civilisation and should not be considered as a threat. The ageing society simply requires many<br />
changes to the role of older people and to the roles of other generations, including many changes in<br />
their mutual relationships. Above all, it requires the active participation of all citizens within the<br />
member states of the <strong>Europe</strong>an Union.<br />
There <strong>are</strong> many issues with respect to older people:<br />
working longer under better conditions<br />
preparing for volunteering whilst still in paid employment<br />
working as a volunteer on an individual basis or in an organised way within public institutions<br />
and other organisations during retirement<br />
having a different position within families<br />
taking part in lifelong learning and education<br />
participating in local communities<br />
participating in taking decisions in municipality matters such as education, health, culture,<br />
transport, social protection, alleviating poverty etc<br />
<strong>All</strong> of these issues plus others <strong>are</strong> important to older people and not just matters such as pension<br />
schemes and pension reforms that <strong>are</strong> reported so often.<br />
Therefore understanding the <strong>Europe</strong>an Union, as well as how and why it has been integrating, will<br />
provide a better grasp of how its institutions and advisory bodies function for your benefit. Moreover,<br />
you will then understand better which non-governmental organisations operate at the <strong>Europe</strong>an<br />
level for your benefit and how you, as senior citizens, can participate in shaping EU policies<br />
concerning your own and other generations. Above all, you may develop an idea of how you can<br />
contribute to the reality of the <strong>Europe</strong>an Union. Together we can make <strong>Europe</strong> a better place to<br />
live!<br />
Reflection / Discuss<br />
Have you learnt anything new about the EU in this module, about opportunities for senior citizens or<br />
yourself in the EU, or about options for your engagement within the concept of the EU Hopefully<br />
yes – however, please reflect upon this module within group discussions. It is up to you which issues<br />
you would like to focus on. Perhaps the following questions can give you a helping hand:<br />
• To what extent is ageing likely to affect how our societies function<br />
• If you wanted to tackle an older people’s issue, which institutions or organisations would<br />
you contact, why and how<br />
• How can we support generations in the middle to provide a link between all the generations<br />
and how can we support all generations to co-operate with each other<br />
• How can we preserve the cultural heritage of older people and pass it on to younger generations<br />
• How can we support senior citizens to continue in employment for longer<br />
• How can we help older people update their skills and make others more aw<strong>are</strong> of what they<br />
can contribute<br />
Hints for additional activities supporting this module<br />
• Spend some time on the websites indicated in this module and find out whether or not they<br />
<strong>are</strong> of some interest to you.<br />
• Try to find local / national offices representing the EU in your country / region – and arrange<br />
a date to visit them.<br />
43
• Find out who <strong>are</strong> the Members of the <strong>Europe</strong>an Parliament (MEP) representing your region /<br />
country – and make contact with them if you have any questions to ask them.<br />
• Follow daily news on TV, radio, in newspapers etc. which contain more intensive reporting<br />
about developments at the EU level, particularly in relation to issues concerning senior citizens<br />
and / or Active <strong>Europe</strong>an Citizenship.<br />
References and other sources helpful for further information:<br />
Balibar, E. (2003): <strong>We</strong> the People of <strong>Europe</strong>; reflections on transnational citizenship. Princeton: Princeton University<br />
Press.<br />
Church, Clive H./Phinnemor, David (2009): The Penguin Guide to the <strong>Europe</strong>an Treaties: From Rome to Maastricht,<br />
Amsterdam, Nice and Beyond. Penguin Reference Books.<br />
Habermas, J. (2009): <strong>Europe</strong> The Faltering Project. Cambridge: Polity.<br />
Intergenerational Solidarity for Cohesive and Sustainable Societes: outcomes of the Slovenian Presidency Conference<br />
Brdo. Slovenia, 28-29. April 2008 .<br />
Moussis, N. (2007): Guide to <strong>Europe</strong>an Policies. 13 th edition. Rixensart. <strong>Europe</strong>an Study Service Official Journal of the<br />
<strong>Europe</strong>an Communities.<br />
http://ec.europa.eu (<strong>Europe</strong>an Commission)<br />
http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives (Eurobarometer)<br />
http://ec.europa.eu/yourvoice (Commission’s website for citizens to express themselves)<br />
http://eesc.europa.eu/index_en.asp (EESC - Economic and Social Committee)<br />
http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu (EUROSTAT – centre for <strong>Europe</strong>an statistics Union Documents)<br />
http://eurageurope.org/eurag/ (EURAG - <strong>Europe</strong>an Federation of Older Persons)<br />
http://europa.eu/documentation (<strong>Europe</strong>an Union Documents)<br />
www.age-platform.org/ (AGE - <strong>Europe</strong>an Older People’s Platform)<br />
www.c<strong>are</strong>foreurope.org/ (C<strong>are</strong> - Christian Action Research & Education for <strong>Europe</strong>)<br />
www.caritas-europa.org (Caritas Europa)<br />
www.ccre.org/ (CCRE - Council of <strong>Europe</strong>an Municipalities and Regions)<br />
www.cecop.coop (CECOP - <strong>Europe</strong>an Confederation of Workers' Cooperatives, Social Cooperatives and Social and Participative<br />
Enterprises)<br />
www.cev.be/ (CEV - <strong>Europe</strong>an Volunteer Centre)<br />
www.coface-eu.org (COFACE - Confederation of Family Organisations in the <strong>Europe</strong>an Union)<br />
www.coface-eu.org/ (COFACE - Confédération des Organisations Familiales de l'Union Européenne)<br />
www.consilium.europa.eu (Council of <strong>Europe</strong>an Union)<br />
www.eapn.org (EAPN - <strong>Europe</strong>an Anti Poverty Network)<br />
www.eaps.nl/(<strong>Europe</strong>an Association for Population Studies)<br />
www.easpd.eu/(<strong>Europe</strong>an Association of Service Providers for Persons with Disabilities)<br />
www.efrp.org/ (<strong>Europe</strong>an Federation for Retirement Provision)<br />
www.enar-eu.org (ENAR - <strong>Europe</strong>an Network Against Racism)<br />
www.esn-eu.org (ESN - <strong>Europe</strong>an Social Network)<br />
www.eurocadres.org/(EUROCADRES - Council of <strong>Europe</strong>an Professional and Managerial Staff)<br />
www.euroc<strong>are</strong>rs.org/ (Euroc<strong>are</strong>rs - <strong>Europe</strong>an Association Working for C<strong>are</strong>rs)<br />
www.eurocities.eu/main.php (Euro Cities)<br />
www.eurohealthnet.eu/ (Euro Health Net)<br />
www.europarl.europa.eu/(<strong>Europe</strong>an Parliament)<br />
www.european-microfinance.org/index2_en.php (EMN - <strong>Europe</strong>an Microfinance Network)<br />
www.family-eu.org/cms/index.php (FAFCE - Föderation der Katholischen Familienverbande in Europa)<br />
www.idies.org/index.phppost/Linstitut-de-la-protection-sociale-europeenneIPSE<br />
www.womenlobby.org (<strong>Europe</strong>an Women's Lobby)<br />
www.youthforum.org/(Forum of Young People in <strong>Europe</strong>)<br />
44
Module 2 – The Concept of Active <strong>Europe</strong>an Citizenship and its Relevance for Senior Citizens<br />
Module 2:<br />
Steffen Hartje (Fritid&Samfund/DK)<br />
The Concept of Active <strong>Europe</strong>an Citizenship and its<br />
Relevance for Senior Citizens<br />
Unit 1<br />
Unit in a nutshell<br />
Achievements<br />
Why is AEC important for senior citizens<br />
Understanding the concept of Active <strong>Europe</strong>an Citizenship (AEC) and its<br />
relevance to senior citizens<br />
Demonstrating the opportunities of AEC for elderly citizens<br />
After this unit you will be able to:<br />
understand why it was - and still is - important to develop the idea of<br />
AEC<br />
understand the rights and obligations upon which the concept of Active<br />
Citizenship is established<br />
apply the concept of AEC to daily life.<br />
I am not an Athenian or a Greek, but a citizen of the world.<br />
Socrates<br />
Warming up:<br />
Please discuss freely about whether or not you have<br />
ever heard about the concept of Active <strong>Europe</strong>an Citizenship<br />
and what citizenship in general and <strong>Europe</strong>an<br />
citizenship in particular mean to you.<br />
Listen / Read<br />
2.1.1. The idea of an active citizenship<br />
The idea of an active citizenship is not new but can be traced back to ancient Greece, where the<br />
philosopher Aristotle was the first to develop a theory about citizenship. In 500 to 400 before Christ,<br />
as a result of Aristotle’s concept, citizenship was practiced by the city government in Athens, called<br />
polis. Greek citizenship was primarily built on the obligations that each citizen had to the city government.<br />
To be an active citizen, one who took part in political life, was considered to be a moral<br />
duty. One was morally obliged to take an active part in common polis matters, if one was to be<br />
respected as a citizen and a human being. The citizenship idea was thus closely linked to the individual<br />
citizen’s rights and the duty to take an active part in the political community. Even though<br />
citizenship was based more on the obligations towards the city government than on the rights of the<br />
individual citizen, the obligations did not take the form of legal orders, but were considered as an<br />
option to serve the community and to gain the resulting respect.<br />
In the 1700s there was a redrafting of the citizenship concept. The beginning of industrialisation and<br />
the spread of the market economy started to create large social changes. These changes were both<br />
results as well as catalysts due to the enormous gap that existed between the traditional absolute<br />
monarchies at the time and the new progressive sense of citizenship - which among other things<br />
finally led to the French Revolution in 1789. At the philosophical level the period was marked by the<br />
enlightenment philosophy that contributed to the development of new values such as freedom,<br />
tolerance, pluralism, individual rights and also secularisation, which separated religion and poli-<br />
45
tics. Following these basic ideas, the new nation states created during the 19th Century made it<br />
possible to develop a real state of law and at the same time secure a state-free environment for the<br />
citizen to act individually and collectively.<br />
The idea of the independence of a state - also from the church - gained more and more credibility,<br />
and the clarification of borders between countries meant that the citizens became more aw<strong>are</strong> of<br />
their affiliation to a nation and of the conditions that applied. As a holder of subjective rights they<br />
enjoyed protection from the nation state as long as they obeyed the law.<br />
2.1.2. Active <strong>Europe</strong>an Citizenship (AEC)<br />
The hasty development of globalisation, given the achievements made in information technology,<br />
the global convergence of the financial markets and the growth in global production has led to nation<br />
states losing more and more control over general production conditions and therefore they <strong>are</strong><br />
limited in their ability to maintain existing welf<strong>are</strong> levels.<br />
The reduction in the importance of the nation state has an impact on our understanding of the concept<br />
of citizenship, as since the era of industrialisation it has always been linked with an understanding<br />
that it is the nation state that secures the rights that make it possible to practice active<br />
citizenship. In line with the rapid pace of globalisation there is a demand that rights <strong>are</strong> no longer<br />
just guaranteed within the nation you live in, but that they <strong>are</strong> also respected by people in other<br />
nations. From being rights of citizenship won by fighting inside the context of a nation state, individual<br />
rights <strong>are</strong> today also secured at the <strong>Europe</strong>an and global levels. Typically social rights will be<br />
secured by the nation state, the rights in relation to the internal market will be guaranteed by the<br />
<strong>Europe</strong>an Union and the UN will guarantee human rights. As a consequence of globalisation the idea<br />
of active citizenship needs to be developed on three levels: the national, <strong>Europe</strong>an and global levels.<br />
The citizens of <strong>Europe</strong> must view themselves not only as British, German, and Italian etc. but<br />
also as a <strong>Europe</strong>an citizen and indeed as a citizen of the world.<br />
The increasing globalisation of the world economy contributes to creating a global identity and responsibility.<br />
Today we see a common responsibility within the <strong>are</strong>a of ecology in terms of global<br />
development. People’s aw<strong>are</strong>ness of the Earth’s limited resources and of the menace posed by an<br />
uncontrolled development of the market economy threatening the fragile ecological balance is creating<br />
a worldwide commitment to our planet. The development of <strong>Europe</strong>an and global responsibility<br />
at both the political and ordinary citizen level could be an important element in the development<br />
of the idea of active citizenship.<br />
A prerequisite for the development of AEC is that citizens in <strong>Europe</strong>an countries have a certain mutual<br />
sympathy and <strong>are</strong> interested in what takes place in other <strong>Europe</strong>an countries, which may hopefully<br />
lead to the development of a common <strong>Europe</strong>an identity. Already today we see many communities<br />
with an identity and self-knowledge that extends beyond the national context in which they<br />
live. There <strong>are</strong> communities of people who network across frontiers using IT-technology; however<br />
there is still a long way to go before a common <strong>Europe</strong>an identity becomes a reality.<br />
The contents of this part of the training course will focus on the participants’ attitude towards<br />
other <strong>Europe</strong>an countries, pointing out, for instance, which countries <strong>are</strong>, in their opinion, the most<br />
popular and which, on the contrary, <strong>are</strong> not considered favourably.<br />
Moreover, how can one become more engaged in what is going on in other EU countries<br />
Reflection / Self-study / Discuss<br />
Active <strong>Europe</strong>an Citizenship is a rather complex concept to explain, especially because it is a hypothetical<br />
construct, such as freedom, love or engagement, and there <strong>are</strong> no generally agreed definitions<br />
concerning it. Finally, it is very much dependent on what a person has in mind when speaking<br />
about AEC – and there is nothing wrong with that!<br />
46
Module 2 – The Concept of Active <strong>Europe</strong>an Citizenship and its Relevance for Senior Citizens<br />
So what does Active <strong>Europe</strong>an Citizenship mean to you Do you think that you <strong>are</strong> already an active<br />
<strong>Europe</strong>an citizen, and if yes, in what context Think of your own opportunities for becoming a<br />
more active citizen. Is there anything that prevents you from being more active, such as physical,<br />
mental, social or other conditions If there <strong>are</strong> any barriers, how can they be overcome<br />
What role can elderly citizens play in the development of AEC at the local, national and <strong>Europe</strong>an<br />
levels What does the demographic trend with the increasing number of elderly people in <strong>Europe</strong><br />
indicate in relation to the development of AEC<br />
Unit 2<br />
Unit in a nutshell<br />
Achievements<br />
The role of civil society in the development of AEC<br />
Considerations concerning the relationship between the development of<br />
civil society and the development of AEC<br />
Introduction of a <strong>Europe</strong>an dimension in voluntary work at the local level<br />
After this unit you will be able to:<br />
understand the connection between local voluntary work and the development<br />
of AEC<br />
improve voluntary work in your local <strong>are</strong>a<br />
organise voluntary work through proactive networking.<br />
It is not always the same thing to be a good man and a good citizen.<br />
(Aristotle)<br />
Warming up:<br />
Play music from other <strong>Europe</strong>an countries - relax, listen and be inspired!<br />
2.2.1. What is the definition of civil society<br />
Listen / Read<br />
“The civil society refers to the <strong>are</strong>na of uncoerced collective action around sh<strong>are</strong>d interests, purposes<br />
and values. In theory, its institutional forms <strong>are</strong> distinct from those of the state, family and<br />
market, though in practice, the boundaries between state, civil society, family and market <strong>are</strong> often<br />
complex, blurred and negotiated. Civil society commonly embraces a diversity of spaces, actors<br />
and institutional forms, varying in their degree of formality, autonomy and power”. (The London<br />
School of Economics Centre for Civil Society's Working; http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/CCS/<br />
what_is_civil_society.htm)<br />
Civil societies <strong>are</strong> populated by many different organisations, such as non-governmental organisations,<br />
community groups, gender organisations, faith-based organisations, associations, trade unions,<br />
self-help groups, social movements, coalitions, advocacy groups and many more.<br />
2.2.2. Associations – a framework for voluntary work and citizenship<br />
The most common form of organisation in civil society is the association, as it is an easy way of organising<br />
voluntary work. Legal, administrative and organisational frameworks for creating an association<br />
do vary from country to country, however on the whole it is a rather simple and inexpensive<br />
procedure. For example in Denmark, one only needs to set some rules that ensure the association is<br />
built on democratic principles, and that there will be a governing board elected from the association’s<br />
members.<br />
47
Quite often it makes sense for citizens to organise voluntary work if they wish to influence the development<br />
of the local community. An active citizenship is built on democratic communities, and<br />
voluntary associations <strong>are</strong> way of fitting into such communities.<br />
In Scandinavia there <strong>are</strong> many voluntary associations and, as in Denmark, even the smallest communities<br />
have many different associations. There <strong>are</strong> voluntary sports associations, scouts associations,<br />
night school associations, youth associations, senior associations etc. The associations <strong>are</strong> also important<br />
for civil society and local democracy, as they make it possible for citizens to get in touch<br />
with other citizens who undertake voluntary work and to communicate from one association to another.<br />
These associations do also make it easier for local politicians to enter into dialogue with civil society.<br />
For example in the Danish municipality of Varde, there is a very good continuous dialogue between<br />
the local associations and the town council organised within the framework of voluntary development<br />
councils.<br />
In a voluntary association active in civil society, citizens can easily learn and understand participative<br />
democracy and active citizenship, as there is little or no interference from the state, from the<br />
market or from other interests in this sector of society.<br />
Exercises<br />
Please discuss the following questions and issues:<br />
What <strong>are</strong> the characteristics of civil society in your country and <strong>are</strong> there any examples of how voluntary<br />
work is linked to local democracy<br />
How can voluntary work be organised more innovatively, and think of a way in which the <strong>Europe</strong>an<br />
dimension can become a part of voluntary work at the local level<br />
How can networking be used in voluntary work<br />
Working in a group please discuss the following question and create some promising suggestions:<br />
How could it be possible to involve more senior citizens in voluntary work and local democracy<br />
(Please consider frameworks, preconditions, barriers, individual and public demands, needs and<br />
interests etc.)<br />
48
Module 2 – The Concept of Active <strong>Europe</strong>an Citizenship and its Relevance for Senior Citizens<br />
Unit 3<br />
Unit in a nutshell<br />
Achievements<br />
Development of new communities in the EU<br />
Understanding how social networks contribute to strengthening <strong>Europe</strong>an<br />
cohesion<br />
After this unit you will be able to:<br />
participate in social networks on the internet<br />
approach new forms of tourism-based projects and networks.<br />
If you treat people right they will treat you right - ninety percent of the time.<br />
Franklin D. Roosevelt<br />
Warming up:<br />
Social networking – what does this mean to you and how does it work Are<br />
you a passionate social networker yourself<br />
2.3.1. What is Social Networking and how does it work<br />
Listen / Read<br />
Social networking is the grouping of individuals into specific groups, such as small rural communities<br />
or a neighbourhood. Traditionally social networking was based on “real” contacts and face-to-face<br />
communication, however in recent years social networking happens more and more online via the<br />
internet. The internet is filled with millions of individuals who <strong>are</strong> looking to meet other internet<br />
users, to gather and sh<strong>are</strong> information or experiences about lots of different topics, from sport to<br />
gardening to developing friendships etc.<br />
In online social networking websites <strong>are</strong> commonly used and <strong>are</strong> called social<br />
sites. Social sites function like an online community of internet users. The<br />
online community members sh<strong>are</strong> a common interest such as an interest in<br />
each other’s lives, hobbies, sports and many other subjects. When you access<br />
a social networking website you can begin to socialise with the other members.<br />
This socialisation may include reading the profile pages of other members<br />
and possibly even contacting them.<br />
Another benefit is that making friends includes intercultural skills and, most of<br />
all, understanding. The internet gives citizens from all around the world access<br />
to social networking sites. This means that although you live in Italy you could<br />
develop an online friendship with someone in Denmark and learn something<br />
about the daily life in this particular <strong>Europe</strong>an country. Not only will you make<br />
new friends, you might also learn a thing or two about new cultures or new languages.<br />
Social networking involves grouping specific individuals or organisations together.<br />
Some of the social networking sites have a focus on a particular interest<br />
whilst others <strong>are</strong> more general. The websites without a main focus <strong>are</strong> often referred to as "traditional"<br />
social networking websites and usually have open memberships. This means that anyone can<br />
become a member.<br />
49
2.3.2. Popular social networks<br />
Facebook (www.facebook.com) is the most popular global social networking website that is operated<br />
and privately owned. Users can add friends and send them messages. Many of the users of<br />
Facebook will tell their friends about what they <strong>are</strong> doing every day, and friends have the opportunity<br />
to comment on these messages.<br />
Blog or weblog is a website mainly maintained by an individual with regular comments, descriptions<br />
of events or other material. Many blogs function as a personal online diary; others provide commentary<br />
on a particular subject. A typical blog combines text, images, links to other blogs, web pages<br />
and other media materials related to its topic. The ability for readers to leave comments in an interactive<br />
format is an important part of many blogs.<br />
Twitter (http://twitter.com) is a free social networking and micro-blogging service that enables its<br />
users to send and read messages known as tweets. Tweets <strong>are</strong> text-based posts displayed on the<br />
author's profile page and delivered to the author's subscribers who <strong>are</strong> known as followers. Senders<br />
can restrict delivery to those in their circle of friends or, by default, allow open access.<br />
In twitter there is a 140-character limit on message and it is sometimes described as the "SMS of the<br />
internet”.<br />
Reflection / Discuss<br />
Please look up some virtual networks and blogs on the internet. What is their basic idea and function<br />
What skills do you think <strong>are</strong> necessary in order to participate in virtual networks How can they<br />
be used for strengthening AEC and cohesion in <strong>Europe</strong> How can you personally benefit and what can<br />
you learn from them<br />
Unit 4<br />
Unit in a nutshell<br />
Achievements<br />
Reflection upon the opportunities for AEC involvement in the future<br />
Designing visions regarding the <strong>Europe</strong>an community and the future development<br />
of AEC<br />
After this unit you will be able to:<br />
design and apply visions for improving AEC and voluntary work in the<br />
<strong>Europe</strong> of the future.<br />
Once you replace negative thoughts with positive ones, you'll start having positive results.<br />
(Willie Nelson)<br />
Warming up:<br />
Agree on song you all would like to sing together – and sing it!<br />
(This is an old tradition in Denmark of singing a song before meetings, seminars,<br />
training etc. It does not harm anyone, and quite often it results in a very<br />
good atmosphere)<br />
50
Module 2 – The Concept of Active <strong>Europe</strong>an Citizenship and its Relevance for Senior Citizens<br />
Listen / Read<br />
2.4.1. The Future Workshop (Shortened version)<br />
The Future Workshop (FW) method is not new. It was created in the 1970s by Robert Jungk, a German<br />
born Austrian writer and journalist, together with some colleagues. It has been used in many<br />
countries over the last decades as an appropriate tool for people willing to develop visions for addressing<br />
real-life problems. Originally it was developed as a method to support the political struggles<br />
of community groups for improved representation of their interests to create a better future<br />
worth living for.<br />
Basically, the Future Workshop can be divided into five phases:<br />
1. The preparatory phase, which involves deciding on the topic and making some practical arrangements<br />
(preparation of flip charts, papers, markers etc.)<br />
2. The critique phase, during which all the negative experiences related to the chosen topic <strong>are</strong><br />
brought into the open. In the critique phase the problem is critically and thoroughly discussed<br />
and investigated. Brainstorming is the preferred creative technique, followed by clustering<br />
and structuring the ideas, thoughts, comments etc. into some main sub-themes.<br />
3. The fantasy phase, in which the participants come up with ideas in response to the problems,<br />
by expressing their desires, fantasies and alternative views. In the fantasy phase the participants<br />
try to create a utopia, to draw an exaggerated picture of the future. Brainstorming and<br />
other creative techniques might be used. The participants should make a selection of the<br />
most interesting notions and develop these into a visionary paper.<br />
4. The implementation phase. The workshop concludes with the implementation phase, in which<br />
the ideas from the previous phase have been seen with more realistic eyes. The ideas <strong>are</strong><br />
checked and evaluated with regard to their practicability and a plan of action is drawn up.<br />
5. In the follow-up phase the FW ends with an agreement on the elaboration of a report that<br />
collects all the results gained and presents a completed action plan.<br />
2.4.2. The Visionary Workshop<br />
The Visionary Workshop (VW) consists of the Fantasy Phase and the Implementation Phase of the<br />
Future Workshop. The problem with the FW in relation to training courses is that it can take too<br />
long to go through all five phases. <strong>We</strong> therefore suggest focussing only on the FW’s most important<br />
phases which <strong>are</strong> the Fantasy Phase and the Implementation Phase of the workshop; together they<br />
<strong>are</strong> often called the Visionary Workshop.<br />
1. The Fantasy Phase<br />
Warming up: Before the participants start with their work it is advised to get them into a creative<br />
mood, e.g. they could listen to some music of their choice, they could play some games or<br />
they could use story telling as source of inspiration. Once everyone feels relaxed and comfortable<br />
the actual working part of the Fantasy Phase can begin.<br />
The work begins: In the Fantasy Phase the participants try to create positive pictures of the future<br />
in relation to the subject which the future workshop is addressing, by questioning themselves:<br />
How do we wish the future to be if it is not restricted by laws, economics, resources<br />
etc The participants should suggest solutions, whilst ignoring these restrictions, such as: How<br />
should life be for elderly people if the state has sufficient money to c<strong>are</strong> for all citizens who<br />
<strong>are</strong> not in the labour market How would it be to live in a society in which there is no discrimination<br />
of older people How would the EU be if older citizens had much greater power<br />
The participants have 10-15 minutes by themselves during which they should try to answer these<br />
questions and create suggestions about how the future could be. When they have finished the<br />
work, they should write their suggestions as headlines on a blackboard or flipchart. When all<br />
have written their headlines each participant should explain what their suggestion refers to.<br />
Very important: During this process there must not be any discussions!<br />
After the presentation of the headlines the next key question is: Which headlines cover the<br />
51
same subject In the following process, the number of headlines will be reduced by clustering<br />
them into umbrella terms or <strong>are</strong>as. When this is completed the participants should list the headlines<br />
in order of priority for working with during the next phase of the workshop. The key question<br />
then to be answered is: Which <strong>are</strong> the most promising headlines for further development<br />
An easy way to do this is for participants to vote with each participant having one or more<br />
votes, as appropriate. As a result of the vote the participants now have some common visions<br />
for the future, upon which they agree, visions that they will try to implement in the next phase<br />
of the workshop!<br />
2. The Implementation Phase<br />
In the Implementation Phase the visions <strong>are</strong> confronted with reality, and the most important<br />
question to be answered is: Which one of them is mostly likely to become a reality in the near<br />
future In the Implementation Phase the participants can involve experts to help them and it<br />
also might be necessary to gain further information through research, e.g. using the internet,<br />
which can enrich the discussions. After the visions from the Fantasy Phase have been confronted<br />
with reality, there will only be a few visions remaining which seem to have the potential to be<br />
implemented in society in the near future – however some of the rest of them might still be useful<br />
as a goal for the group. The Implementation Phase will end with an action plan which will be<br />
elaborated upon. The action plan will describe what needs to be done by whom and when as a<br />
concrete follow-up to the workshop.<br />
Exercise<br />
Select a topic of your choice and test whether or not the Visionary Workshop is an appropriate tool<br />
for a group with limited time to create promising visions! One hint: select topics which <strong>are</strong> close to<br />
your own life, interests and expertise – perhaps even in connection with the application that is<br />
planned to be submitted at the end of this course!<br />
References and other sources helpful for further information<br />
Hartje, Steffen (2007): The idea of an active citizenship. (www.learnship.eu)<br />
Marshall, T.H./Bottomore (1991): Citizenship and Social. Pluto Classic. USA.<br />
Jungk, Robert/Mullert, Norbert (1970): Future workshops: How to Create Desirable Futures, Institute for Social Inventions.<br />
Social Networking in Plain English: A short explanation of social networking websites and why they <strong>are</strong> popular. This video<br />
comes in an unbranded "presentation quality" version that can be licensed for use in the workplace.<br />
http://twitter.com<br />
www.coe.int<br />
www.commoncraft.com/store-item/video-social-networking<br />
www.facebook.com<br />
www.globalideasbank.org/site/bank/idea.phpideaId=1657<br />
www.learnship.eu<br />
www.lse.ac.uk<br />
www.whatissocialnetworking.com<br />
52
Module 3 – The <strong>Europe</strong> for Citizens Programme (ECP) and its relevance for AEC and Senior Citizens<br />
Module 3:<br />
Teresa Diaz Bello/Yolanda Mates (ASAEL/ES)<br />
The <strong>Europe</strong> for Citizens Programme (ECP) and its<br />
relevance for AEC and Senior Citizens<br />
Unit 1<br />
Unit in a nutshell<br />
Achievements<br />
The <strong>Europe</strong> for Citizens Programme (ECP)<br />
Exploitation of the ECP, its priorities, features and structure<br />
Information concerning the funder and operator of the ECP<br />
Reflecting best practice elements of a good project and the procedures<br />
for submitting project applications<br />
After this unit you will be able to:<br />
value the ECP programme<br />
give a basic overview of the ECP<br />
estimate its potential for the general public<br />
define a good project concept with main key factors<br />
You get a passport, you can vote, you <strong>are</strong> entitled to the protection of the state.<br />
(Toolkit on <strong>Europe</strong>an Citizenship)<br />
Warming up:<br />
According to the content learnt so far, has your approach towards the EU<br />
and / or the concept of Active <strong>Europe</strong>an Citizenship changed<br />
If so, how and why<br />
3.1.1. Structure of the <strong>Europe</strong> for Citizens Programme<br />
Listen / Read<br />
In order to achieve its objectives the <strong>Europe</strong> for Citizens Programme (ECP)<br />
proposes four actions, divided into different measures.<br />
Action 1 – Active Citizens for <strong>Europe</strong>: This action is directed specifically at activities involving citizens.<br />
These activities fall into two types as follows:<br />
- Town twinning<br />
Direct exchanges between <strong>Europe</strong>an citizens through their participation in town twinning<br />
activities encourage networking and cooperation between twinned towns to create real<br />
links between citizens of different <strong>Europe</strong>an member states.<br />
- Citizens projects and support measures<br />
Within this measure a variety of projects of a transnational and cross-sectoral nature, directly<br />
involving citizens can be supported.<br />
Action 2 – Active Civil Society in <strong>Europe</strong>: This action is aimed at civil society organisations and think<br />
tanks, which can receive either structural support on the basis of their work programme or support<br />
for transnational projects, the so called action grant. This action is composed of three sets of<br />
measures.<br />
53
- Structural support for <strong>Europe</strong>an public policy research organisations (think-tanks)<br />
This measure is designed to strengthen the institutional capacity of <strong>Europe</strong>an public policy<br />
research organisations (think tanks).<br />
- Structural support for civil society organisations at the <strong>Europe</strong>an level<br />
This measure provides civil society organisations, which operate with a <strong>Europe</strong>an dimension,<br />
with the capacity and stability to develop their activities at the <strong>Europe</strong>an level.<br />
- Support for projects initiated by civil society organisations<br />
The aim of this measure is to support cooperation through concrete projects by civil society<br />
organisations from different participating countries.<br />
Action 3 – Together for <strong>Europe</strong>: This action focuses on deepening the concept of active <strong>Europe</strong>an<br />
citizenship and at promoting its understanding all over <strong>Europe</strong>, thereby contributing to bringing<br />
<strong>Europe</strong> closer to its citizens, through three sets of measures:<br />
- High-visibility events<br />
This measure will support events organised by the Commission, where appropriate in cooperation<br />
with the member states or other relevant partners, which help to increase citizens’<br />
sense of belonging to the same community and their commitment to the <strong>Europe</strong>an project.<br />
- Studies<br />
In order to gain a better understanding of active citizenship at the <strong>Europe</strong>an level the<br />
Commission carries out studies, surveys and opinion polls.<br />
- Information and dissemination tools<br />
Comprehensive information on the various activities of the Programme, on other <strong>Europe</strong>an<br />
actions related to citizenship and on other relevant initiatives, will be provided through different<br />
dissemination tools.<br />
Action 4 – Active <strong>Europe</strong>an Remembrance: This action aims at preserving the main sites and archives<br />
associated with deportations and at commemorating the victims of Nazism and Stalinism, as a<br />
means of moving on from the past and building the future.<br />
3.1.2. Who operates the ECP<br />
The <strong>Europe</strong>an Commission: The <strong>Europe</strong>an Commission is ultimately responsible for the smooth running<br />
of the ECP. It manages the budget and sets priorities, targets and criteria for the programme<br />
on an ongoing basis, following consultation with the Programme Committee. Furthermore, it guides<br />
and monitors the general implementation, follow-up and evaluation of the programme at the <strong>Europe</strong>an<br />
level. The <strong>Europe</strong>an Commission relies on an Executive Agency to carry this out.<br />
The Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA):<br />
The EACEA was established in 2005 and is responsible for the implementation of most of the actions<br />
of the <strong>Europe</strong> for Citizens Programme. It is responsible for the management of the complete life<br />
cycle of these projects. The EACEA also oversees the <strong>Europe</strong> for Citizens Points (PEC) whereby<br />
member states <strong>are</strong> responsible for ensuring targeted, effective grass-roots dissemination of practical<br />
information on the programme implementation. A list of PECs can be found on the EACEA website<br />
(http://eacea.ec.europa.eu).<br />
The member states and other participating countries: The EU member states <strong>are</strong> also involved in<br />
the implementation of the ECP, in particular through the Programme Committee, to which they<br />
appoint representatives. And, of course, they also host the PECs to inform their citizens first-hand<br />
about the programme. Last but not least municipalities, councils, associations, NGOs etc. <strong>are</strong> also<br />
involved at the national level in the development and orientation of the EPC.<br />
54
Module 3 – The <strong>Europe</strong> for Citizens Programme (ECP) and its relevance for AEC and Senior Citizens<br />
3.1.3. Elements of a good project idea<br />
Of course this question cannot be answered in a simple way, however here <strong>are</strong> some hints and recommendations<br />
(please also see Modules 5 - 7):<br />
have an interesting, innovative and viable idea<br />
pay attention to the objectives of the programme, to its priority themes, to the horizontal features<br />
and to the concept of this measure<br />
prep<strong>are</strong> a clear and detailed presentation of a meeting’s programme<br />
explain what will happen during the project, what the role of the participants will be and what<br />
the sustainable results of your project will be<br />
ensure that the programme provides an active role for the participants<br />
explain how the local community is involved in the project, e.g. during the preparation phase, in<br />
connection with project meetings or in connection with possible follow-up activities<br />
explain what kinds of publicity and other public exposure the project will receive.<br />
Exercise<br />
Please find out where your national PEC is and make contact with its staff via email, telephone or<br />
by visiting it in person. Ask questions regarding what you wish to know about the ECP and do not<br />
forget to inform the PEC about the <strong>AESAEC</strong> project. Arrange a date when the entire group of learners<br />
can visit the PEC in person.<br />
Unit 2<br />
Unit in a nutshell<br />
Achievements<br />
Action 1 of the ECP and its relevance for AEC and Senior Citizens<br />
In-depth view of Action 1 (Active Citizens for <strong>Europe</strong>) and its relevance<br />
for senior citizens<br />
After this unit you will be able to:<br />
evaluate Action 1 of the ECP according to its potential for being applied<br />
to for projects addressing topics relevant to senior citizens.<br />
<strong>We</strong> have made <strong>Europe</strong>, but, how do we make <strong>Europe</strong>ans<br />
(Toolkit on <strong>Europe</strong>an Citizenship)<br />
Warming up:<br />
Please discuss following questions:<br />
Are you familiar with the concept of town twinning Is your home town<br />
or village twinned with a town or village in another <strong>Europe</strong>an country<br />
If so, have you ever been involved in any of the activities<br />
In your opinion do you think that town twinning actions <strong>are</strong> of any<br />
value or <strong>are</strong> they just a waste of time Why Why not<br />
3.2.1. Action 1 – Active Citizens for <strong>Europe</strong><br />
Listen / Read<br />
This action is divided in three measures:<br />
1. Town Twinning: this measure consists of benefiting from the links established at the local<br />
level between twinned municipalities for fostering exchanges and cooperation.<br />
55
2. Citizens Projects and Support measures which provide support for citizens projects which<br />
<strong>are</strong> aimed at assisting <strong>Europe</strong>ans from different countries to come together around common<br />
issue and promote the exchange of good practice and to help pool experience.<br />
Ad 1. Town Twinning<br />
Town twinning is a reality in <strong>Europe</strong> today as a significant number of municipalities <strong>are</strong> linked to<br />
each other through town twinning agreements. Town twinning encourages exchanges of experiences<br />
on a variety of issues of <strong>Europe</strong>an interest, and it provides unique opportunities to learn about the<br />
daily lives of citizens in other <strong>Europe</strong>an countries. The Town Twinning measure is subdivided into<br />
two sub-measures:<br />
Citizens meetings, the objectives of which <strong>are</strong> defined as:<br />
- a commitment to <strong>Europe</strong>an integration<br />
- active participation<br />
- building up friendship<br />
- intercultural dialogue.<br />
Networks of twinned towns, whose objective <strong>are</strong> (in addition to 1.1.):<br />
- networking among municipalities on issues of common interest appears to be an important<br />
means for enabling informed discussions and exchange of good practice. Twinning is<br />
a strong link that binds municipalities; therefore, the potential of the networks created<br />
by a series of town twinning links should be used for developing thematic and long-lasting<br />
cooperation between towns. Activities should have a defined target group for which the<br />
selected theme is particularly relevant and involve community members active in the<br />
subject <strong>are</strong>a (experts, local associations, citizens and citizens groups directly affected by<br />
the theme etc.).<br />
Ad 2 Citizens projects and support measures<br />
Citizens meetings: a major challenge of the <strong>Europe</strong>an Union today is to bridge the gap between<br />
the <strong>Europe</strong>an citizens and the <strong>Europe</strong>an institutions. This measure aims at exploring innovative<br />
methodologies and approaches to encourage the active participation of citizens<br />
at the <strong>Europe</strong>an level and to stimulate dialogue between <strong>Europe</strong>an citizens and <strong>Europe</strong>an<br />
institutions.<br />
Support measures: this function is a tool to develop the quality of projects submitted within<br />
Action 1. It also supports the exchange of experiences, expertise and good practice.<br />
Exercise / Reflection / Research Discuss<br />
Visit the official website of the <strong>Europe</strong> for Citizens Programme<br />
(http://ec.europa.eu/citizenship/index_en.html), look up an appropriate language version (it is<br />
available in English, German and French) and find the Programme Guide in your national language.<br />
There you can find detailed information about the programme in general as well as about Action 1.<br />
Please form 4 groups, and split the 4 measures between these groups; each group should now insert<br />
the missing information concerning the measure it is has been allocated in the wanted table below.<br />
Present the results to each other and discuss what advantages and disadvantages <strong>are</strong> generally connected<br />
to the different frameworks of the measures when applying for and implementing a project<br />
(such as being eligible in the first place, the effort needed to apply for a project, the demands of<br />
implementing a project, amount of grant money received etc.)<br />
Do also discuss which of the measures you think <strong>are</strong> more suitable for submitting a project application<br />
in order to increase the participation of senior citizens in the <strong>Europe</strong> for Citizens Programme<br />
56
Module 3 – The <strong>Europe</strong> for Citizens Programme (ECP) and its relevance for AEC and Senior Citizens<br />
WANTED<br />
<strong>Europe</strong> for Citizens Programme –<br />
Action 1: Active Citizens for <strong>Europe</strong><br />
Characteristics<br />
Measure<br />
1.1.<br />
Measure<br />
1.2.<br />
Measure<br />
2.1.<br />
Measure<br />
2.2.<br />
Topics<br />
Objectives<br />
Target groups<br />
and eligible organisations<br />
Eligible countries<br />
Min. and Max.<br />
Number of<br />
partners<br />
Role of<br />
partners<br />
Min. and max.<br />
duration of action<br />
Documents to<br />
be used for application<br />
Deadline(s) for<br />
application<br />
Regulations for<br />
reporting<br />
Grant regulations<br />
Payment procedures<br />
Others:<br />
____________________<br />
57
Unit 3<br />
Unit in a nutshell<br />
Achievements<br />
Action 2 of the ECP and its relevance for AEC and Senior Citizens<br />
In-depth view of Action 2 (Active Civil Society in <strong>Europe</strong>) and its relevance<br />
for senior citizens<br />
After this unit you will be able to:<br />
evaluate Action 2 of the ECP according to its potential for being applied<br />
to for projects addressing topics relevant to senior citizens.<br />
Citizenship is the peaceful struggle though a public sphere which is dialogical.<br />
(Toolkit on <strong>Europe</strong>an Citizenship)<br />
Warming up:<br />
Explain briefly what these concepts mean to you:<br />
- think tanks<br />
- civil society organisations.<br />
3.3.1. Action 2 – Active Civil Society in <strong>Europe</strong><br />
Listen / Read<br />
This action supports civil society organisations and think tanks as a tool for specific links among<br />
<strong>Europe</strong>an citizens and the <strong>Europe</strong>an Union. It is divided into three measures:<br />
1. Structural support for <strong>Europe</strong>an policy research organisations (think tanks)<br />
2. Structural support for civil society organisations at the <strong>Europe</strong>an level<br />
3. Support for projects initiated by civil society organisations<br />
Ad Measure 1 and 2: In order to provide think tanks and civil society organisations at the <strong>Europe</strong>an<br />
level with the necessary capacity and stability for extending and structuring their activities, structural<br />
support is available to <strong>Europe</strong>an policy research organisations in the form of an operating grant<br />
to cover part of their running costs.<br />
Ad Measure 3: Support for projects initiated by civil society organisations.<br />
Project should take one of the following forms:<br />
- Event projects: seminars, colloquia, workshops, debates, hearings, meetings, training activities,<br />
socio-cultural activities.<br />
- Projects with tangible products: publications, websites, TV/radio broadcasts, production of<br />
audio-visual material, opinion polls, studies, analysis, production of education and training<br />
materials, application of new information technologies.<br />
Structure of the projects:<br />
- action<br />
- debate<br />
- reflection<br />
- networking.<br />
Exercise / Reflection / Research / Discuss<br />
Please have a look again at the ECP programme guide and collect information and data concerning<br />
all issues that <strong>are</strong> relevant to know about if one wishes to apply for a project. Therefore, please use<br />
58
Module 3 – The <strong>Europe</strong> for Citizens Programme (ECP) and its relevance for AEC and Senior Citizens<br />
again the above wanted table and adapt it yourself to the content and structure of Action 2. Do<br />
discuss again the advantages and disadvantages of the individual measures and their specific potential<br />
for project applications submitted by and for senior citizens.<br />
Unit4<br />
Unit in a nutshell<br />
Achievements<br />
Action 3 of the ECP and its relevance for AEC and Senior Citizens<br />
In-depth view of Action 3 (Together for <strong>Europe</strong>) and its relevance for<br />
senior citizens<br />
After this unit you will be able to:<br />
evaluate Action 3 of the ECP according to its potential for being applied<br />
to for projects addressing topics relevant to senior citizens.<br />
Citizenship is not just a certain status, defined by a set of rights and responsibilities. It<br />
is also an identity, an expression of one’s membership of a political community.<br />
(Will Kymlicka)<br />
Warming up:<br />
In groups of 3-4 persons reflect and answer the next question:<br />
According to your opinion what topic could be celebrated by a<br />
high profile event in 2010<br />
3.4.1. Action 3 – Together for <strong>Europe</strong><br />
Listen / Read<br />
This action aims at deepening the concept of Active <strong>Europe</strong>an Citizenship and promoting its understanding<br />
all over <strong>Europe</strong>, thereby contributing to bringing “<strong>Europe</strong> closer to its citizens”, through<br />
three sets of measures:<br />
1. high profile events<br />
2. studies<br />
3. information and dissemination tools.<br />
Ad Measure 1:<br />
High profile events should be substantial in scale and scope, striking a chord with the peoples of<br />
<strong>Europe</strong>, helping them to increase their sense of belonging to the same community, making them<br />
aw<strong>are</strong> of the history, achievements and values of the <strong>Europe</strong>an Union, involving them in intercultural<br />
dialogue and contributing to the development of their <strong>Europe</strong>an Identity.<br />
Ad Measure 2:<br />
In order to obtain a better understanding of active citizenship at the <strong>Europe</strong>an level the Commission<br />
will carry out studies, surveys and opinion polls.<br />
Ad Measure 3:<br />
Places the focus on citizens and the variety of initiatives in the <strong>are</strong>a of active citizenship, on comprehensive<br />
information about the various activities of the programme, on other <strong>Europe</strong>an actions<br />
related to citizenship and on other relevant initiatives provided through an internet portal or by<br />
other means.<br />
ATTENTION!<br />
It is important to know that this action will be initiated and carried out only by the <strong>Europe</strong>an Commission,<br />
and therefore it is not planned to select projects under the measure described below.<br />
59
Exercise / Reflection / Research / Discuss<br />
Try to identify projects, activities, events etc. initiated by the <strong>Europe</strong>an Commission under this<br />
Action 3 of the ECP. Evaluate them according to the level at which they address your interests, demands<br />
and needs Would you have spent money on them too Why Why not<br />
Unit 5<br />
Unit in a nutshell<br />
Achievements<br />
Action 4 of the ECP and its relevance for AEC and Senior Citizens<br />
In-depth view of Action 4 (Active <strong>Europe</strong>an Remembrance) and its relevance<br />
for senior citizens<br />
After this unit you will be able to:<br />
evaluate Action 4 of the ECP according to its potential for being applied<br />
to for projects addressing topics relevant to senior citizens.<br />
“To them I will give within my temple and its walls a memorial and a name better than sons<br />
or daughters; I will give them an everlasting name that will not be cut off.” (Isaiah 56;5)<br />
Warming up:<br />
According to your opinion what does active remembrance mean<br />
Have you organised or attended an Active <strong>Europe</strong>an Remembrance<br />
event If so, what was it about<br />
3.5.1. Action 4 – Active <strong>Europe</strong>an Remembrance<br />
Listen / Read<br />
The <strong>Europe</strong>an Union is built on fundamental values such as freedom, democracy and respect for<br />
human rights. In order to fully appreciate their meaning it is necessary to remember the breaches<br />
of those principles caused by Nazism and Stalinism in <strong>Europe</strong>. It is particularly important to do so<br />
now, as the witnesses <strong>are</strong> gradually disappearing. An aw<strong>are</strong>ness of the full dimensions and tragic<br />
consequences of the Second World War will thereby be maintained, particularly through the involvement<br />
of younger generations of <strong>Europe</strong>ans.<br />
By their activities citizens will engage in a reflection on the origins of the <strong>Europe</strong>an Union, on the<br />
history of <strong>Europe</strong>an integration, which has preserved peace among its members, and finally on today’s<br />
<strong>Europe</strong>, thereby moving beyond the past and building the future. This action will therefore<br />
play an important role in nourishing the broad reflection on the future of <strong>Europe</strong> and in promoting<br />
active <strong>Europe</strong>an citizenship.<br />
The following projects will be funded:<br />
- Projects linked to the preservation of the main sites and memorials<br />
associated with the mass deportations, the former concentration<br />
camps and other large-scale martyrdom and extermination sites of<br />
Nazism, as well as the archives documenting these events, and for<br />
keeping alive the memory of the victims, as well as the memory of<br />
those who, under extreme conditions, rescued people from the<br />
Holocaust.<br />
60
Module 3 – The <strong>Europe</strong> for Citizens Programme (ECP) and its relevance for AEC and Senior Citizens<br />
- Projects linked to the commemoration of the victims of mass exterminations<br />
and mass deportations associated with Stalinism, as<br />
well as the preservation of the memorials and archives documenting<br />
these events.<br />
Projects can take one of the following forms:<br />
- Event projects: conferences, seminars, colloquia, workshops, meetings, training activities,<br />
socio-cultural activities etc.<br />
- Projects with tangible products: publications, websites, TV/radio broadcasts, production of<br />
audio-visual material, opinion polls, studies, analysis, production of education and training<br />
materials, application of new information technologies etc.<br />
Exercises<br />
<strong>All</strong> projects must correspond to at least one of the following features and <strong>are</strong> encouraged to combine<br />
several of them. Please have a look at the ECP guide and find out what needs to be understood<br />
under these features:<br />
Preservation:<br />
Commemoration:<br />
Reflection:<br />
Networking:<br />
Finally, please discuss the following questions in connection with Action 4 of the ECP:<br />
- What kind of project topics dealing with the country you <strong>are</strong> living in at the moment could<br />
fit into this action<br />
- Are you a time witness yourself who could enrich an Action 4 project with your own life experience<br />
- The Active <strong>Europe</strong>an Remembrance action seems to be perfect for the participation and engagement<br />
of senior citizens. Do you agree with this statement What <strong>are</strong> the challenges and<br />
what <strong>are</strong> the risks of this action according to your opinion<br />
- This action somehow seems to link the atrocities of World War Two and of the Nazi and the<br />
Stalin regimes with the birth of the modern <strong>Europe</strong>, which finally developed into the <strong>Europe</strong>an<br />
Union as we know it today. Do you agree with this fundamental idea or not<br />
61
Unit 3.6.<br />
Unit in a nutshell<br />
Achievements<br />
Think Tank<br />
Introduction to an evaluation tool in order to reflect about the ECP and<br />
its potential for senior citizens<br />
After this unit you will be able to:<br />
evaluate the ECP according to its potential for being applied to for projects<br />
addressing topics relevant to senior citizens ´<br />
express profound recommendations about how to make the ECP more<br />
attractive to senior citizens.<br />
3.6.1. Check list for project ideas in the ECP<br />
As a very basic method of orientation to help decide whether or not you should continue with planning<br />
to apply for EU funding under the ECP, please consider the following criteria:<br />
1) Under which action/measure<br />
do you<br />
wish to submit a project<br />
application<br />
2) What is the basic idea<br />
of your project<br />
(please describe briefly)<br />
3) Do what degree does<br />
your idea meet the requirements<br />
of the …<br />
4) Is the promoter an eligible organisation/body<br />
5) Is/<strong>are</strong> the partner organisation(s)<br />
eligible<br />
6) Do you have the potential (knowhow,<br />
time, manpower, funds etc.) to<br />
write and submit an application<br />
7) Is it realistic to submit a proposal<br />
before the application deadline<br />
8) Do you have the potential (knowhow,<br />
time, manpower, funds etc.) to<br />
implement a project in case it is<br />
funded<br />
9) Do you have the financial means to<br />
pre-finance some of the project activities<br />
and to finance expenses not<br />
covered by the funding (if there <strong>are</strong><br />
any) as your own contribution<br />
10) Are you aw<strong>are</strong> of all accompanying<br />
activities in connection with an EU<br />
project (such as evaluation and particularly<br />
public relation activities)<br />
11) Does your idea have a high degree<br />
of potential for sustainability and will<br />
there be an (added) value also after<br />
the project has ended<br />
12) Now, after answering all of these<br />
questions, <strong>are</strong> you still willing to continue<br />
with the development of your<br />
project idea<br />
Evaluation and checklist for project ideas under the ECP<br />
Action 1<br />
Action 2<br />
Measure: _________________________________________________<br />
Action 3<br />
Action 4<br />
__________________________________________________________________________________<br />
__________________________________________________________________________________<br />
__________________________________________________________________________________<br />
__________________________________________________________________________________<br />
__________________________________________________________________________________<br />
__________________________________________________________________________________<br />
__________________________________________________________________________________<br />
__________________________________________________________________________________<br />
Fully<br />
Not at all<br />
programme’s objectives<br />
10 – 9 – 8 – 7- 6 – 5 – 4 – 3 – 2 – 1 – 0<br />
thematic priorities<br />
10 – 9 – 8 – 7- 6 – 5 – 4 – 3 – 2 – 1 – 0<br />
horizontal features<br />
10 – 9 – 8 – 7- 6 – 5 – 4 – 3 – 2 – 1 – 0<br />
motivation/interest of your organisation<br />
10 – 9 – 8 – 7- 6 – 5 – 4 – 3 – 2 – 1 – 0<br />
motivation/interest of your partner organisation 10 – 9 – 8 – 7- 6 – 5 – 4 – 3 – 2 – 1 - 0<br />
Yes No Comments, plans, suggestions, considerations etc.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
62
Module 3 – The <strong>Europe</strong> for Citizens Programme (ECP) and its relevance for AEC and Senior Citizens<br />
3.6.2. Check list for project ideas in the ECP<br />
Now that you know about the ECP in detail, what do you think about its orientation and potential,<br />
and its challenges and risks Please use the table below to express your opinion, considerations,<br />
recommendations etc.:<br />
A) Which action do you<br />
think is most appropriate<br />
to promote the idea<br />
of <strong>Europe</strong> and of Active<br />
<strong>Europe</strong>an Citizenship in<br />
general<br />
Action 1<br />
Action 2<br />
Action 3<br />
Action 4<br />
Fully<br />
Evaluation of the ECP<br />
Not at all<br />
10 – 9 – 8 – 7- 6 – 5 – 4 – 3 – 2 – 1 – 0<br />
10 – 9 – 8 – 7- 6 – 5 – 4 – 3 – 2 – 1 – 0<br />
10 – 9 – 8 – 7- 6 – 5 – 4 – 3 – 2 – 1 – 0<br />
10 – 9 – 8 – 7- 6 – 5 – 4 – 3 – 2 – 1 – 0<br />
Comments, plans, suggestions, considerations<br />
etc.<br />
B) Which action do you<br />
think is most appropriate<br />
for senior citizens<br />
to actively participate<br />
in<br />
Action 1<br />
Action 2<br />
Action 3<br />
Action 4<br />
Fully<br />
Not at all<br />
10 – 9 – 8 – 7- 6 – 5 – 4 – 3 – 2 – 1 – 0<br />
10 – 9 – 8 – 7- 6 – 5 – 4 – 3 – 2 – 1 – 0<br />
10 – 9 – 8 – 7- 6 – 5 – 4 – 3 – 2 – 1 – 0<br />
10 – 9 – 8 – 7- 6 – 5 – 4 – 3 – 2 – 1 – 0<br />
Comments, plans, suggestions, considerations<br />
etc.<br />
C) What do you think <strong>are</strong><br />
the strengths of the<br />
ECP<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
D) What kind of<br />
chances/opportunities<br />
do you have if you apply<br />
for a project under the<br />
ECP<br />
(assuming the project<br />
receives funding)<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
E) What do you think <strong>are</strong><br />
the weaknesses of the<br />
ECP<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
F) What kinds of<br />
risks/threats <strong>are</strong> there<br />
if you apply for a project<br />
under the ECP<br />
(assuming the project<br />
receives funding)<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
G) What should be done<br />
to make the ECP more<br />
attractive for senior<br />
citizens to participate<br />
in more actively<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
63
Please make contact with your national contact point for the EPC and arrange a meeting. Either<br />
invite a representative to your training course or visit the office in your country with the whole<br />
learner group. Present and discuss the results of this evaluation, and focus in particular on <strong>are</strong>as<br />
and possible activities of the EPC that could be improved to make it more attractive to senior citizens<br />
to participate in.<br />
Hints for additional activities supporting the module implementation<br />
• Please have a thorough look at the programme’s website for detailed information and including<br />
the programme’s guide (http://ec.europa.eu/citizenship/index_en.html).<br />
• Make contact with your national office or info centre for the ECP and arrange a meeting; do<br />
also consider contacting an official office for the promotion of the EU at a local or regional<br />
level and discuss issues of interest to you with them.<br />
• Do also use other opportunities to leave the classroom or to bring in persons from outside<br />
your learning group as often as possible, e.g. visit activities and events organised by the ECP<br />
or visit/invite people/organisations that already have experience of implementing a project<br />
under this programme etc.<br />
• In particular, when working on Action 4 you could consider your group holding a minute’s silence<br />
in remembrance of the victims of the Holocaust and other victims of the Nazi and Stalin<br />
regimes.<br />
• If possible visit a site of historic remembrance, a museum or documentation centre etc.<br />
dealing with remembrance as described in Action 4.<br />
References and other sources helpful for further information<br />
Barberm N. (2002): Citizenship, Nationalism and the <strong>Europe</strong>an Union. 27. <strong>Europe</strong>an Law Review 241.<br />
Centre for Civil Society/London School of Economics (01/03/2004): What is civil society<br />
(http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/CCS/what_is_civil_society.htm. Retrieved on 2006-10-30)<br />
Counsil of <strong>Europe</strong>: The <strong>Europe</strong>an Convention on Human Rights (1950) and its Five Protocols (1952-1966).<br />
GD for Education and Culture (2009): <strong>Europe</strong> for Citizens Program 2007-2013. Program Guide. Version valid as of 1 st January<br />
2009.<br />
Toolkit on <strong>Europe</strong>an Citizenship. (http://www.historyguide.org/europe/lecture16.html)<br />
WIENER, A. (1998): <strong>Europe</strong>an Citizenship Practice. Building Institutions of a Non-State. Boulder (CO): <strong>We</strong>stview Press.<br />
WINTER J.A/D.M CURTIN/KELLERMANN, A.E./ WITTE, B.D. (Eds.) (1996): WEILER, J.H.H.: <strong>Europe</strong>an Citizenship and Human<br />
Right. pp 57-86. The Hague, Boston, London: Kluwer Law International.<br />
http://conventions.coe.int/treaty/en/WhatYouWant.aspNT=005<br />
http://eacea.ec.europa.eu<br />
http://ec.europa.eu/citizenship/index_en.html<br />
http://ecas.org<br />
http://europeanhistory.about.com/cs/enlightnment<br />
www.coe.int<br />
www.eacea.ec.europa.eu<br />
www.fordham.edu/halsall/ancient/asbook.html<br />
www.utm.edu/research/iep/l/locke.htm<br />
www.youtube.com/resultssearch_query=EU+citizenship&search_type=&aq=f<br />
www.youtube.com/watchv=A7AMjNYA-n8<br />
64
Module 4 – The Grundtvig Initiative on Volunteering in <strong>Europe</strong> for Seniors (GIVE)<br />
Csilla Lázár (Soros Educational Center Foundation/RO)<br />
Module 4:<br />
The Grundtvig Initiative on Volunteering in <strong>Europe</strong><br />
for Seniors (GIVE) and its relevance for AEC and<br />
Senior Citizens<br />
Unit 4.1.<br />
Unit in a nutshell<br />
Achievements<br />
The Lifelong Learning Programme (LLP) and Grundtvig in a nutshell<br />
Raising aw<strong>are</strong>ness about the <strong>Europe</strong>an Commission’s lifelong learning<br />
policy<br />
Familiarising learners with the Lifelong Learning Programme, its subprogrammes,<br />
their aims, target groups and objectives<br />
After this unit you will be able to:<br />
understand the main ideas of the <strong>Europe</strong>an Commission’s lifelong learning<br />
policy<br />
differentiate between several funds and programmes through which the<br />
<strong>Europe</strong>an Commission promotes lifelong learning for different target<br />
groups (including senior citizens)<br />
be aw<strong>are</strong> of mobility opportunities for various target groups (including<br />
senior citizens).<br />
It’s never too late to learn!<br />
Warming up:<br />
My personal experience about lifelong learning:<br />
Please think about the following questions, and then discuss them with your colleagues:<br />
What does lifelong learning mean in my personal life<br />
Does the proverb in the motto above fit into my life<br />
What did you learn and when<br />
Directly after you were born: _____________________________<br />
at age three: ___________________________________________<br />
at seven: ____________________________________________<br />
at fifteen: __________________________________________<br />
in your twenties: _______________________________________<br />
in your thirties: ________________________________________<br />
in your forties: _______________________________________<br />
in your fifties: __________________________________________<br />
last year/month/week: __________________________________<br />
Learning from each other<br />
Senior learners at the Soros Educational Center<br />
in Miercurea-Ciuc/Csíkszereda (RO)<br />
Listen / Read<br />
4.1.1. Lifelong learning then and now<br />
Look at the paintings below by Pieter Brueghel the Elder, or choose pictures by painters of other<br />
genres, and try to figure out what types of abilities and skills were necessary in daily life during the<br />
times depicted:<br />
65
The Hay Harvest (Pieter Brueghel the Elder¸ Lobkowicz Palace at Prague Castle)<br />
Netherlandish Proverbs (Pieter Brueghel the Elder¸ Gemäldegalerie Berlin)<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
What main skills and abilities – in social as well as in professional life – were necessary a few<br />
hundred years ago<br />
How much <strong>are</strong> these skills and abilities still needed today<br />
How do you think lifelong learning differed in Brueghel’s time from what it is in today<br />
66<br />
Now watch following film about the Lifelong Learning Programme of the <strong>Europe</strong>an Commission:<br />
http://ec.europa.eu/education/lifelong-learning-programme/doc78_en.htm
Module 4 – The Grundtvig Initiative on Volunteering in <strong>Europe</strong> for Seniors (GIVE)<br />
<br />
<br />
What do you think <strong>are</strong> the most important skills and abilities that <strong>are</strong> necessary to transform the<br />
EU into “a leading economy in the global knowledge based society”<br />
Is it realistic for an appropriate number of EU citizens to acquire these skills and abilities in the<br />
near future What needs to be done to achieve this aim<br />
Exercise / Reflection / Discuss<br />
Find information in your national language about the <strong>Europe</strong>an Commission’s lifelong learning policy<br />
and the Lifelong Learning programme. Use all sources and media available and make a list of the<br />
useful contact details and websites!<br />
4.1.2. The EC’s Lifelong Learning components and main target <strong>are</strong>a<br />
The <strong>Europe</strong>an Commission named the sub-programmes of its Lifelong Learning programme after<br />
great thinkers and scientists in <strong>Europe</strong>an history, namely Comenius, Grundtvig, Erasmus and<br />
Leonardo da Vinci. Can you match the pictures below with these names What do you know<br />
about their lives and work Look up there biographies, e.g. on the internet using Wikipedia and<br />
make short presentations about them to your training group.<br />
Based on the information you found about the lives and work of Comenius, Grundtvig, Leonardo and<br />
Erasmus, and using information from the web resources you collected in a previous section, try to<br />
match the following target groups to the relevant LLP sub-progammes (check the correct answers at the<br />
end of module):<br />
Comenius Grundtvig Leonardo Erasmus<br />
A) pre-primary to upper secondary school children, teachers and other staff<br />
B) students, teachers, researchers involved in higher education<br />
C) vocational school learners and teachers<br />
D) learners above the age of 20 and educational staff involved in formal, non-formal and<br />
informal adult education.<br />
Why do you think <strong>Europe</strong>an strategists chose these names to represent the Lifelong Learning subprogrammes<br />
67
4.1.3. Grundtvig for adult education<br />
It’s never too late to learn – the existence of this proverb in most languages illustrates that learning<br />
has never been conceived as an exclusive undertaking for young people. The <strong>Europe</strong>an Commission<br />
supports continuing and after-school education via the sub-programme called Grundtvig.<br />
Look at the information brochures about the Grundtvig programme or visit a website in your national<br />
language and try to find answers to the following questions (check the correct answers at the end of<br />
module):<br />
How many components does the Grundtvig programme currently have<br />
How many of these <strong>are</strong> aimed at supporting individual mobility<br />
According to the Lifelong Learning Programme Guide 2009, the Grundtvig sub-programme “addresses<br />
the teaching and learning needs relating to all forms of adult learning which <strong>are</strong> not of a<br />
predominantly vocational nature, as well as the institutions and organisations providing or facilitating<br />
any form of such learning opportunities for adults – whether of a formal, non-formal or informal<br />
nature – including those involved in the initial and in-service training of staff.”<br />
Do you know any local / regional / national organisations that would / could be eligible for the<br />
Grundtvig programme<br />
Do you know any individuals who could apply for a Grundtvig mobility grant<br />
4.1.4. Grundtvig case studies<br />
Exercise / Self-study / Discuss<br />
Read about some projects undertaken by institutions and individuals within various Grundtvig actions.<br />
Try to match each case study to the names of the Grundtvig actions you learned about in the<br />
previous section (check the correct answers at the end of module):<br />
A) A group of 10 people from different <strong>Europe</strong>an countries participated in a one week long<br />
workshop in Romania, where they studied traditional handicrafts (wool processing, weaving<br />
and feltmaking) and folk art. During the one week workshop they received an insight<br />
into the history of traditional Transylvanian handicrafts, the use of handmade objects in<br />
traditional peasant society, the role of handicrafts in modern societies as well as handicrafts<br />
as a way of artistic self-expression. The costs of the workshop were partly covered<br />
under the ________________ Grundtvig action of the LLP.<br />
B) Four people from Hungary and four from Denmark, all aged above 50, have been volunteering<br />
in each other’s countries working with non-profit disabled children’s institutions.<br />
Their home organisations applied for a ________________ Grundtvig grant to support this<br />
volunteering exchange.<br />
C) Anna Kovac, trainer at the School for Inclusive Education in Prague, participated in a<br />
five-day training course in Spain entitled Education and tackling drop-out and disaffection<br />
in schools. She was supported by the <strong>Europe</strong>an Commission under the ________________<br />
Grundtvig action.<br />
D) <strong>Europe</strong>an Computer Network – Opening the internet up for the elderly (EuCoNet) is a<br />
project in which partners from six different <strong>Europe</strong>an countries (DE, IT, CZ, ES, SK, and<br />
the UK) developed learning and teaching methods for senior citizens and exchanged existing<br />
approaches like peer-learning and intergenerational learning. The project was supported<br />
under the ________________ Grundtvig action.<br />
68
Module 4 – The Grundtvig Initiative on Volunteering in <strong>Europe</strong> for Seniors (GIVE)<br />
Unit 4.2.<br />
Unit in a nutshell<br />
Achievements<br />
Volunteering as a form of Active Citizenship<br />
Definition and discussion of forms and principles of volunteering<br />
Presentation of volunteering opportunities for senior citizens<br />
After this unit you will be able to:<br />
define more clearly what volunteering can be<br />
identify organisations that work with volunteers at the local, national<br />
and <strong>Europe</strong>an levels<br />
identify what the most important aspects of a volunteering project <strong>are</strong>.<br />
The highest reward for man's toil is not what he gets for it, but what he becomes by it.<br />
(John Ruskin)<br />
Warming up:<br />
My idea of volunteering:<br />
Is it usual for people in your community to volunteer<br />
What <strong>are</strong> the most popular forms of volunteering<br />
Have you ever volunteered<br />
Thinking about these questions, write down two sentences<br />
starting with “Volunteering is…”<br />
Comp<strong>are</strong> your sentences with those of your colleagues.<br />
Volunteers<br />
This file is licenced under the<br />
Creative Commons Attribution Sh<strong>are</strong>Alike 3.0<br />
Licence. In short: you <strong>are</strong> free to sh<strong>are</strong> and<br />
make derivative works of the file under the<br />
conditions that you appropriately attribute it,<br />
and that you distribute it only under a licence<br />
identical to this one.<br />
4.2.1. Official approach towards volunteering<br />
Listen / Read<br />
The United Nations Volunteers Report, prep<strong>are</strong>d for the UN General Assembly Special Session on<br />
Social Development, Geneva, in February 2001, defines volunteering as follows:<br />
There <strong>are</strong> three key defining characteristics of volunteering. Firstly the activity should not be undertaken<br />
primarily for financial reward, although the reimbursement of expenses and some token<br />
payment may be allowed.<br />
Secondly the activity should be undertaken voluntarily, according to an individual’s own free-will<br />
(…).<br />
Thirdly the activity should be of benefit to someone other than the volunteer, or to society at large,<br />
although it is recognised that volunteering brings significant benefit to the volunteer as well.<br />
(Excerpt)<br />
How much does your opinion differ from what this official definition states<br />
4.2.2. Types of volunteering<br />
Please undertake some brief “research” within your group concerning which kind of volunteer activities<br />
<strong>are</strong> represented the most by answering the following questions:<br />
Do you currently actively participate in or do voluntary work for one or more of the following types<br />
of organisations<br />
- Environmental protection or animal rights organisation<br />
- Political party or organisation<br />
- Leisure association for the elderly<br />
69
- Trade union<br />
- Charitable or social aid organisation<br />
- Religious or church organisation<br />
- Education, arts, music or cultural organisation<br />
- Consumer organisation<br />
- An organisation for the defence of elderly rights<br />
- An organisation defending the interest of patients and / or disabled<br />
- Business or professional organisation<br />
- International organisation<br />
- Other interest groups for specific causes<br />
- None of these<br />
- Don’t know<br />
The above question has been taken from a piece of research on social reality in the EU (<strong>Europe</strong>an<br />
Commission’s Special Eurobarometer on Social Reality published in 2007). According to this report,<br />
8 out of 10 EU citizens consider helping others or voluntary work as an important aspect of life, but<br />
most <strong>Europe</strong>ans (64%) do not actively participate or do any voluntary work, at least not with any of<br />
the organisations listed in the questionnaire. The <strong>Europe</strong>an average conceals large differences between<br />
the results of the different member states.<br />
Look at the chart below and comp<strong>are</strong> your group’s results with the official results at the EU and<br />
national levels. Are your group results similar to or different from the results presented in the report<br />
What could be the reason for any differences<br />
Tab. 1. Do you currently actively participate in or do voluntary work for<br />
one or more of the following types of organisations<br />
A sport club or club for outdoor activities<br />
Education, arts, music or cultural association<br />
Religious or church organisation<br />
A charity orgnisation or social aid organisation<br />
A trade union<br />
A leisure association for the elderly<br />
Other interest groups for specific causes<br />
Political party or organisation<br />
An environmental protection, animal rights<br />
organisation, etc.<br />
An international organisation<br />
A business or professional organisation<br />
Organisation defending the interest of patients<br />
and/or disabled<br />
An organisation for the defence of elderly rights<br />
A consumer organisation<br />
None of these (Spontaneous)<br />
Don't know<br />
1%<br />
1%<br />
2%<br />
8%<br />
6%<br />
5%<br />
4%<br />
3%<br />
2%<br />
2%<br />
2%<br />
2%<br />
2%<br />
1%<br />
13%<br />
64%<br />
Tab. 2. Extent of active participation or voluntary work in the EU<br />
AT<br />
NL<br />
SE<br />
FI<br />
DK<br />
LU<br />
IE<br />
BE<br />
FR<br />
SI<br />
IT<br />
CZ<br />
SK<br />
UK<br />
EE<br />
DE<br />
MT<br />
CY<br />
LV<br />
RO<br />
ES<br />
EL<br />
HU<br />
PL<br />
PT<br />
LT<br />
BG<br />
60%<br />
55%<br />
53%<br />
50%<br />
49%<br />
45%<br />
40%<br />
37%<br />
36%<br />
35%<br />
34%<br />
33%<br />
33%<br />
28%<br />
28%<br />
25%<br />
24%<br />
23%<br />
20%<br />
18%<br />
18%<br />
18%<br />
17%<br />
16%<br />
12%<br />
11%<br />
10%<br />
70
Module 4 – The Grundtvig Initiative on Volunteering in <strong>Europe</strong> for Seniors (GIVE)<br />
Exercises<br />
Where can I volunteer<br />
Look at the list in the table below of types of organisations. Can you give examples of such local /<br />
regional / national or <strong>Europe</strong>an organisations Use the internet and / or other available sources to<br />
search for such organisations. In small groups make a list of them.<br />
Area of activities<br />
Name of<br />
organisation<br />
Level of activity<br />
(local/regional/national/EU)<br />
Where located<br />
Environmental protection or<br />
animal rights organisation, etc.<br />
Political party or organisation<br />
Other interest groups for specific<br />
causes<br />
Leisure association for the elderly<br />
Trade union<br />
Charitable or social aid organisation<br />
Religious or church organisation<br />
Education, arts, music or cultural<br />
organisation<br />
Consumer organisation<br />
An organisation for the defence<br />
of elderly rights<br />
An organisation defending the<br />
interest of patients and/or disabled<br />
Business or professional organisation<br />
International<br />
organisation<br />
Other organisations<br />
71
Comp<strong>are</strong> your list with the findings of the other groups.<br />
Which of these organisations have you joined as a volunteer Which could you join<br />
Why did you join Why would you join Why not<br />
Learn about volunteer work in practice!<br />
Invite a volunteer worker from a local organisation to visit your group or visit his / her organisation<br />
yourselves. Speak about his / her and your own experiences with volunteer work as well as how<br />
volunteer work and the <strong>AESAEC</strong> training programme could be linked with each other.<br />
The following questions might help you to start off a conversation:<br />
Why did you decide to work as a volunteer<br />
How did you choose the organisation you <strong>are</strong> working for<br />
What <strong>are</strong> the personal benefits of your volunteering and what <strong>are</strong> the benefits to your organisation<br />
What <strong>are</strong> the most difficult / challenging aspects of your work and how do you prep<strong>are</strong> for your<br />
activities in general<br />
How do you make use of what you have learnt during volunteering<br />
Have you or has your organisation ever participated in an EU funded project in connection with<br />
your volunteer work<br />
How would you recommend volunteering to the course participants<br />
Self-study exercise<br />
Below you can read a report about a successful volunteering project (adapted from Davide di Pietro<br />
(2006): STILL ACTIVE! Handbook for Volunteers). Firstly please read the description of the project<br />
and afterwards discuss the following aspects:<br />
How do you think the volunteers benefited from the project<br />
How do you think the host organsiation has benefited from the project<br />
How do you think the project was prep<strong>are</strong>d<br />
DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT:<br />
PROJECT HOST: Tiszta Forrás Alapítvány, Budapest, Hungary<br />
PROFILE AND CONTEXT OF THE WORK: Volunteer work in a homeless shelter. The<br />
shelter has two different <strong>are</strong>as: one <strong>are</strong>a is for homeless people, who visit during the<br />
day and receive food, take a shower and wash their clothes. A second is a residential<br />
<strong>are</strong>a where only men live and can cook for themselves. These men <strong>are</strong> officially registered<br />
and regularly go to work. Once a week the shelter holds a Bible study and a<br />
meeting for people addicted to alcohol.<br />
ACTIVITIES OF THE VISITING SENIOR VOLUNTEER: A volunteer may help in the daily<br />
housework, can help in the office or in the kitchen. Depending on language skills, he<br />
can be of great help in communicating with the homeless people, sharing time with<br />
them and listening to their problems.<br />
NUMBER OF WEEKS: 2 - 4 weeks<br />
WHAT IS EXPECTED FROM THE SENIOR VOLUNTEER<br />
No qualifications <strong>are</strong> necessary, but openness and the willingness to be confronted by<br />
serious problems. Since 2002 the organisation has worked with foreign volunteers aged<br />
18-25 years from Germany and other EU countries, however the ability to express<br />
oneself in the Hungarian language is desirable (minimum level: 1).<br />
72
Module 4 – The Grundtvig Initiative on Volunteering in <strong>Europe</strong> for Seniors (GIVE)<br />
Now read the final report written by a volunteer and see how the project turned out to<br />
be successful in practice. Which were the key elements for the success of the project<br />
FINAL REPORT OF THE VOLUNTEER<br />
Antonio, Italian volunteer<br />
PRACTICAL ASPECT:<br />
I already had some previous experience in Rome. I did voluntary work in a<br />
community house for abandoned children. I can’t speak Hungarian and my<br />
English is quite basic. Upon my arrival I felt immediately in tune with the<br />
employees of the organisation. Only one of the employees spoke a little English,<br />
and she was essential for the success of my stay there. My task was to<br />
support those responsible for buying and distributing food and other basic<br />
items. It was also the best place to have contact with the reality of homelessness.<br />
From the start the co-operation has been constructive and friendly<br />
despite the language difficulties. <strong>We</strong> used sign language most of the time<br />
and their kindness, spontaneity and c<strong>are</strong> did the rest. I was well housed,<br />
staying in a guesthouse with English breakfast near the centre in Budapest<br />
(an interesting and very beautiful city). During the daily activities I had<br />
lunch with the organisation’s volunteers. I felt at home because I had all<br />
that I needed during the day and the people who I met there treated me in a<br />
friendly way. I felt fully satisfied with the visit.<br />
SOCIAL AND HUMAN ASPECTS:<br />
First of all I am very happy to have had this experience. Even if I had stayed<br />
there for a shorter period I think that the benefit of this experience for<br />
spirit and mind would still have been higher than originally expected. I tried<br />
to live this experience in the best way from the start. For example, one day<br />
I attended a mass (ecumenical rite) for homeless people. During it a woman<br />
burst out crying as she told us her experience. This memory will be stamped<br />
on my mind for ever as well as the silence and the expression of the other<br />
people attending the mass. Doing voluntary work in one’s own country is<br />
natural but to go and help people in other countries is something that perhaps<br />
everyone should do. I believe it is necessary to be determined, resolute<br />
and conscious of what somebody wants to give.<br />
ADVICE, SUGGESTION<br />
I consider that this experience should be encountered on an individual basis<br />
to stimulate a spirit of integration. Two weeks is too short a time if someone<br />
does not have an open mind. English is essential, but it is also necessary<br />
to be interested, motivated, friendly and curious.<br />
4.2.3. Thinking of possible volunteering projects<br />
Volunteering projects vary according to factors such as local needs and the volunteer’s interests and<br />
motivation. In small groups discuss the following topics:<br />
Could the project described above be implemented in your country Why Why not<br />
Is the topic of the project relevant / of high priority in your country Why Why not<br />
Can you think of other volunteering project topics that could be relevant to the local needs of<br />
your community<br />
Comp<strong>are</strong> your group’s ideas with those of other groups and save your project ideas to be discussed<br />
further in the following units of this module.<br />
73
Unit 4.3.<br />
Unit in a nutshell<br />
Achievements<br />
Senior Volunteering Exchange Projects<br />
Goals of senior volunteering exchange programmes<br />
Opportunities and risks of senior volunteering exchange programmes<br />
Participants in a senior volunteering exchange project and their roles<br />
Generating senior volunteering exchange project ideas<br />
After this unit you will be able to:<br />
understand the goal of senior volunteer exchange programmes<br />
understand the benefits of international volunteering<br />
understand the intercultural aspects of international volunteering<br />
be acquainted with the components of a senior volunteering project<br />
know the main tasks that a volunteering project involves<br />
be familiar with some of the risks and opportunities that international<br />
volunteering presents<br />
identify projects that would meet your motivation and interest<br />
The world is a book, and those who do not travel read only one page.<br />
(St. Augustine)<br />
Warming up:<br />
Friendship after war:<br />
The start of structured volunteering endeavours goes<br />
back to the beginning of the Twentieth Century. On<br />
the UNESCO’s website the following event is described:<br />
In 1920 the first international voluntary work camp<br />
was organised in Esnes, a village near Verdun<br />
(France), an <strong>are</strong>a ravaged by horrible battle that<br />
took some one million lives during the war. An initiative<br />
of the International Fellowship of Reconciliation,<br />
the camp helped rebuild farms and other<br />
physical infrastructure, and, significantly, included<br />
volunteers who had been enemy soldiers in the<br />
Great War.<br />
(From work camps to virtual aid, by Arthur Gillette,<br />
former Secretary General of the Coordinating Committee<br />
for International Voluntary Service)<br />
Search the internet to find more information about<br />
this first volunteering camp, and then discuss the following:<br />
What do you think was the underlying message of<br />
this action<br />
Why do you think German volunteers joined the<br />
group<br />
How do you think local people appreciated the<br />
work of the volunteers<br />
Workcamp in Esnes near Verdun, 1920.<br />
An early example of international volunteering.<br />
74
Module 4 – The Grundtvig Initiative on Volunteering in <strong>Europe</strong> for Seniors (GIVE)<br />
4.3.1. Participants in international volunteering<br />
Listen / Read<br />
International volunteering means – besides solidarity and help - people from different nationalities,<br />
backgrounds and lifestyles working closely to achieve a common goal. Volunteering abroad is an<br />
intercultural - and in the case of senior volunteers – an intergenerational experience, where not<br />
only the volunteer is introduced to another culture, but also the host organisation learns new perspectives<br />
from the foreign volunteer.<br />
Basically, an international senior volunteering project has three main participants / parties:<br />
I. A Hosting Organisation<br />
II. A Sending Organisation<br />
III. The Senior Volunteer(s)<br />
Look at the following list of tasks, which is a jumbled up list of the three parties’ responsibilities<br />
(adapted from di Pietro (2006): STILL ACTIVE! A training course for senior volunteers). Discuss these<br />
tasks within your group and decide which task is expected to be performed by which of the above<br />
listed participants / parties (check the correct answers at the end of module).<br />
N° Task<br />
Participant /<br />
party responsible<br />
I II III<br />
1 Send sufficient and clear information to sending organisation and volunteers <br />
2 Keep motivated during the exchange programme <br />
3 Recruit and prep<strong>are</strong> volunteers <br />
4 Follow all the agreements set out at the pre-departure stage <br />
5 Respect the local culture of the host organisation <br />
6<br />
Look for information on the host country and organisation and sh<strong>are</strong> it with the<br />
volunteers<br />
<br />
7<br />
Arrange the programme including practicalities such as meals, accommodation and<br />
travel<br />
<br />
8 Transportation from the meeting point (airport or train station) to the project site <br />
9<br />
<strong>We</strong>lcoming and first orientation for volunteers: introduce the volunteer to the<br />
project and to all the members, volunteers and staff of the hosting organisation<br />
<br />
10<br />
Pooling of previous volunteers and asking them to inform the new volunteers about<br />
their volunteering experience<br />
<br />
11<br />
Take c<strong>are</strong> of the volunteer during and after the project, ensuring contacts with the<br />
hosting organisation while the volunteer is in the project<br />
<br />
12 Be responsible for their own belongings and for themselves <br />
13 Keep and respect different roles within the hosting organisation and the project <br />
14<br />
Introduce the local culture, customs, laws, traditions, beliefs and norms to the<br />
volunteers<br />
<br />
15 Be involved in the local community <br />
16 Evaluate the project (write evaluation reports) <br />
17 Be responsible for volunteers sent <br />
18 Identification of a tutor or a contact person for the volunteers <br />
19 Coordinating daily work of the volunteers <br />
20 Provide information about arrival date and time of the volunteer <br />
21 Help new volunteers after returning to the home country <br />
22 Self-manage their free time <br />
23 Provide emergency contact persons for families of volunteers <br />
24 Coordinating daily work for the volunteers <br />
25 Organising extra activities, e.g. leisure activities, or giving information about<br />
opportunities and activities in the <strong>are</strong>a<br />
<br />
75
Practicing a senior volunteering exchange action through role-play<br />
Exercise<br />
Please split yourselves into two groups and imagine that Group A represents the board of a hosting<br />
organisation and Group B a group of senior volunteers. In order to be prep<strong>are</strong>d for the different<br />
roles involved please read c<strong>are</strong>fully the following profile and set-up:<br />
Group A:<br />
You <strong>are</strong> the board of a non-profit organisation that represents older people in a German city.<br />
You collaborate with experts, service organisations and self-help groups, and the organisation<br />
also runs a day-c<strong>are</strong> centre for older people. You have been contacted by a French organisation<br />
that has similar aims and they propose sending to you a small group of retired people (including<br />
an electrician, a nurse, a housewife and a carpenter) to volunteer with your organisation for a<br />
period of three weeks.<br />
Discuss the following topics:<br />
Would you be challenged in thinking about this opportunity<br />
What would you expect from this volunteering project<br />
What information would you ask the French organisation to provide before you make a<br />
decision<br />
How would you prep<strong>are</strong> for the project<br />
Group B.<br />
You <strong>are</strong> a group of retired French volunteers (among you there is an electrician, a nurse, a<br />
housewife and a carpenter). You <strong>are</strong> members of a French organisation that represents the rights<br />
of older people. You would like to improve your organisation and also your German language<br />
skills. Some of you studied German at school and have been a few times to Germany and Austria<br />
for short visits. The board of your organisation plans a volunteer exchange with a German older<br />
people’s organisation. You <strong>are</strong> thinking about applying to be involved.<br />
Discuss the following topics:<br />
What would you expect from this volunteering project<br />
What would you ask from the prospective host organisation<br />
How would you prep<strong>are</strong> for the project<br />
After each person has defined and formulated his / her expectations, needs and fears in connection<br />
with this senior volunteering exchange action, please “meet” each other to exchange approaches<br />
and information and to agree on a basic framework about how the action can be prep<strong>are</strong>d and implemented<br />
successfully.<br />
Read / Discuss<br />
4.3.2. Opportunities and risks of international volunteering<br />
Read the first part of an Italian volunteer’s testimonial (adapted from di Pietro, (2006): Still active.<br />
A training course for senior volunteers) about her international volunteering experience in an organic<br />
agriculture co-operative. The volunteer should have been involved in the different activities<br />
of the co-operative, such as promotion, production and distribution of the products.<br />
Report of Italian volunteer (part 1)<br />
76<br />
I could tell enjoyable anecdotes, about my trip, my luggage and the transhipment<br />
of an over 60, as I was immediately called upon to prove that I belong<br />
to those “Active citizens who still have physical energy”. However I’d<br />
rather describe myself as a clumsy and a bit provincial woman, a sort of a<br />
“grandmother with a big suitcase”.<br />
In my bag, indeed, I had a bit of everything: a small moka machine “Bialetti”,<br />
some organic coffee, some food as a present for my hosts, some<br />
“Navelli” saffron and other nonsense stuff to compensate for the terrible<br />
truth: I DO NOT KNOW ANY FRENCH AND I KNOW NOTHNING ABOUT COM-<br />
PUTERS! What will they do with me What will I do with them
Module 4 – The Grundtvig Initiative on Volunteering in <strong>Europe</strong> for Seniors (GIVE)<br />
<br />
<br />
Discuss the possible risks of a senior volunteering project, e.g. lack of communication, intolerance,<br />
lack of clear tasks, isolation of the volunteer etc.<br />
How do you think this specific experience continued<br />
Now please read the second part of the report before answering the questions below:<br />
Report of Italian volunteer (part 2)<br />
My selfish will was to improve my little knowledge of French. I don’t think I<br />
achieved this aim although I do think that I have somehow succeeded in giving<br />
and receiving good and positive feelings and experiences.<br />
My ten year experience as an events manager allowed me to find and suggest<br />
some ways of improving the commercial aspect of the produce and the communication,<br />
in order to reach a wider audience and to help develop the<br />
hosting organisation.<br />
As I had previously been told about the situation I was entering into, I had<br />
done some research in the Rome <strong>are</strong>a, collecting material from organic factories<br />
and organisations, which turned out to be useful and interesting for<br />
my French hosts.<br />
Personally I am happy to have been involved in this kind of agricultural activity,<br />
which was something completely new to me. Therefore I actively participated<br />
and finally rediscovered the pleasure of simple things, which give<br />
you the real taste of life, and give the feeling that you <strong>are</strong> still useful and<br />
interested in others.<br />
It may sound strange, but I felt such a pleasure in staying in the countryside<br />
all day long, picking beans, pumpkins and apples, and helping to prep<strong>are</strong> and<br />
deliver the baskets of produce.<br />
I even d<strong>are</strong> to say that my experience was definitely positive for me and for<br />
the hosting community. I’ve been officially invited to the inauguration of an<br />
old factory that, on my advice, should become a sort of agrotourism and organic<br />
cultural centre to host courses, meetings etc… (my proposal was presented<br />
to the town council and accepted instead of their project, which only<br />
included the restoration of the building and the setting up of the organisation’s<br />
offices). I am proud of this. I’m in contact with them, and I always<br />
send material which I consider useful to them.<br />
Questions:<br />
In order to complete a successful volunteering visit <strong>are</strong> volunteers required to have specific<br />
skills What do you consider is more important: professional skills, social skills, intercultural<br />
skills or any other skills<br />
Are language skills vitally important for an international volunteer How can one overcome the<br />
language barrier, before and during the volunteering visit<br />
Could a local volunteer achieve the same goals within a project as an exchange volunteer If<br />
not, what would be different and what <strong>are</strong> the benefits / disadvantages<br />
Joining an international volunteering project yourself:<br />
If you were to join an international volunteering project, what kind of project would you like to<br />
be involved in<br />
A) social: c<strong>are</strong> for disadvantaged people, activities for disabled children, teaching skills to difficult<br />
unemployed youngsters etc.<br />
B) environmental: cleaning beaches or parks, restoring sites of particular historical interest,<br />
helping in facilitating educational activities etc.<br />
C) cultural: helping in the organisation of festivals or cultural events, helping cultural organisations<br />
in their daily administration and in the organisation of campaigns, supporting intercultural<br />
education projects etc.<br />
D) Others: ____________________________________________________________________<br />
<br />
Which <strong>Europe</strong>an country would you like to go to, and why<br />
77
What kind of activities would you like to do there (Do not only think of activities that <strong>are</strong> just<br />
related to your qualifications, but also those that relate to your hobbies or activities you have<br />
never tried but have always wanted to do)<br />
Unit 4.4.<br />
Unit in a nutshell<br />
Achievements<br />
GIVE - Initiative on Volunteering in <strong>Europe</strong> for Seniors<br />
Understanding the objectives and structure of the GIVE programme<br />
Knowing about the application process and the structure of the application<br />
form<br />
Generation of promising project ideas<br />
After this unit you will be able to:<br />
understand the <strong>Europe</strong>an dimension and <strong>Europe</strong>an added value of senior<br />
volunteering projects<br />
understand the goals, structure and application procedure for GIVE projects<br />
complete the relevant parts of the GIVE application form<br />
produce eligible and appropriate project ideas to apply for <strong>Europe</strong>an<br />
funding under the GIVE programme.<br />
<strong>We</strong> learn by example and by direct experience because there <strong>are</strong> real limits to the adequacy of<br />
verbal instruction. (Malcolm Gladwell)<br />
Warming up:<br />
In the previous unit you have read about various volunteering<br />
projects. Starting from the idea of “learning by experience”,<br />
what do you think:<br />
Do the volunteering projects presented contribute to the<br />
enhancement of Active <strong>Europe</strong>an Citizenship amongst the<br />
participants If yes, how - if not, why not<br />
What do volunteers learn from this volunteering experience<br />
Help, learn, travel!<br />
Listen / Read / Exercise<br />
4.4.1. The “GIVE” action under the Lifelong Learning Programme<br />
According to the <strong>Europe</strong>an Commission “volunteering is increasingly recognised as a very valuable<br />
informal learning experience for people of all ages.” (Guide to the Lifelong Learning Programme)<br />
Therefore since 2009 the <strong>Europe</strong>an Commission supports senior volunteering projects under the<br />
Grundtvig component of the Lifelong Learning Programme. This specific programme is called the<br />
Initiative on Volunteering in <strong>Europe</strong> for Seniors (GIVE) and it is managed by National Agencies in all<br />
countries participating in the Lifelong Learning Programme. On the <strong>Europe</strong>an Commission’s website<br />
you will find links to all National Agencies involved in the Lifelong Learning Programme:<br />
http://ec.europa.eu/education/lifelong-learning-programme/doc1208_en.htm<br />
Please visit the website of your National Agency and access the National Call for Proposals under<br />
the Lifelong Learning Programme. Look up all the available information about senior volunteering<br />
projects and GIVE, consult the printed guides and information materials distributed by the trainers<br />
and then answer the following questions by matching the questions in Table A with the answers in<br />
Table B:<br />
78
Module 4 – The Grundtvig Initiative on Volunteering in <strong>Europe</strong> for Seniors (GIVE)<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
Table A<br />
What <strong>are</strong> the main objectives of the EC<br />
projects supporting senior volunteering<br />
Who can participate in a “GIVE” project<br />
(what is the criteria for individuals –<br />
volunteers - to participate)<br />
How many organisations need apply together<br />
for the same project What will be<br />
their role<br />
How many volunteers can take part in a<br />
“GIVE” project<br />
How long should the volunteering period<br />
be<br />
6 Where <strong>are</strong> applications sent F<br />
7<br />
How much funding can a project receive<br />
from the EC and what kind a costs will<br />
this money cover<br />
A<br />
B<br />
C<br />
D<br />
E<br />
G<br />
Table B<br />
Individual adults participating in a GIVE project as volunteers<br />
must be aged 50 or above and be either nationals of:<br />
- a country participating in the LLP, or<br />
- other countries, provided that they <strong>are</strong> either permanent<br />
residents or registered as stateless persons holding refugee<br />
status in a country which participates in the programme.<br />
- to enable senior citizens to volunteer in another <strong>Europe</strong>an<br />
country for any kind of non-profit activity, as a form of informal<br />
(and mutual) learning activity;<br />
- to create lasting cooperation between the host and sending<br />
organisations around a specific topic or target group, as a result<br />
of the exchange of volunteers;<br />
- to enable the local communities involved in the exchange of<br />
volunteers to draw on the potential of senior citizens as a<br />
source of knowledge, skills and experience.<br />
An application must be sent to the relevant National Agency of<br />
the applicant.<br />
The volunteering activity in another country is carried out in one<br />
continuous period of 3-8 weeks.<br />
Each organisation will be expected to send 2-6 volunteers and to<br />
host 2-6 volunteers during the grant period.<br />
Funding for Senior Volunteering Projects is provided in the form<br />
of a lump-sum grant to each of the two organisations participating<br />
in the project concerned. It is designed to help cover both<br />
the travel and subsistence costs of the volunteers and the costs<br />
incurred by the organisations involved in the project.<br />
The GIVE project partnership must consist of two organisations,<br />
each located in different countries, participating in the LLP, and<br />
at least one of must be an EU member state.<br />
In the last phase of the previous unit you discussed about joining an international volunteering project.<br />
Based on the guidelines of the GIVE programme, about which you just heard, please discuss<br />
the following:<br />
<br />
<br />
Do you think your project idea would be eligible for funding under the GIVE programme<br />
What kind of improvements still need to be made to your idea (E.g. finding a transnational<br />
partner, to agree on a specific work programme for incoming volunteers etc.; please do also<br />
look at the closing exercise in 4.2.3.).<br />
In case you decide to apply for a GIVE project, Modules 5 and 6 will help you to design and write a<br />
good proposal, and Module 7 will provide you with hints and tips for implementing the project successfully.<br />
Read / Write / Discuss<br />
4.4.2. Becoming familiar with the application form and process<br />
If you wish to meet the challenge of participating in a GIVE project, then applications need to be<br />
sent to the National Agencies of the sending and hosting organisations. For this purpose there is a<br />
specifically designed application form available which has the following basic structure:<br />
1. Submission data (who to send the application to and by when)<br />
2. Coordinator (presentation of one of the two partners, that is the one that assumes the coordination<br />
of the project)<br />
3. Partner (presentation of the other partner organisation)<br />
4. Declaration of honour<br />
5. Description of the proposed budget<br />
6. Project management, work programme, key activities<br />
7. Requested funding<br />
79
Think of the senior volunteering project ideas that you have outlined in the previous section of this<br />
unit, and discuss what should be written in the following sections of the application. Then insert key<br />
words or key sentences into the tables provided below. (In this context, please consider thoroughly<br />
what you learnt about the risks and opportunities involved with international senior volunteering<br />
projects.)<br />
A) Communication and cooperation (section 5.5. of the application form)<br />
B) How will the activities match the volunteer’s profiles and interests<br />
(section 5.7.4 of the application form)<br />
Linguistic difficulties foreseen (section 5.9.2 of the application form)<br />
C) What impacts and benefits do you expect the project activities to have on volunteers<br />
(section 5.10.1 of the application form)<br />
D) Impact and benefits resulting from the <strong>Europe</strong>an nature of the project<br />
(section 5.10.4 of the application form)<br />
80
Module 4 – The Grundtvig Initiative on Volunteering in <strong>Europe</strong> for Seniors (GIVE)<br />
Read / Discuss<br />
The GIVE quiz<br />
True or false Individually complete the quiz below then discuss your results with the whole group.<br />
(check the correct answers at the end of module)<br />
True False<br />
Are the following statements “True” or “False”<br />
☺ ☹<br />
a GIVE supports volunteering activities by seniors in their own countries. <br />
Volunteering is undertaken of a person’s own free-will, choice and motivation, and<br />
b<br />
<br />
is without concern for financial gain.<br />
c Volunteers replace professional, paid employees. <br />
d Projects should involve two organisations from two different countries. <br />
e The GIVE programme is open to adult citizens aged 50 or above. <br />
Activities in which the volunteers will be involved can be profit making activities.<br />
f<br />
<br />
g<br />
The funding from the EC is a contribution towards the travel and subsistence costs<br />
of the volunteers and organisational costs of the sending and receiving organisations.<br />
<br />
<br />
Hints for additional activities supporting the module implementation<br />
• Spend some time on the websites indicated in this module and find out whether or not they<br />
<strong>are</strong> of some interest to you.<br />
• Make contact with your National Agency for the LLP, in particular the person(s) responsible<br />
for the GIVE programme, and arrange a meeting.<br />
• Do also use other opportunities to leave the classroom or to bring in persons from outside<br />
your learning group as often as possible, e.g. visit NGOs, speak with organisations / persons<br />
that have already experienced LLP, GIVE programme and / or volunteering work and / or intercultural<br />
co-operation, visit locations where volunteering work is happening successfully<br />
etc.<br />
• This unit includes many activities which ask for the active as well as creative participation<br />
of learners in training – please make sure these activities <strong>are</strong> implemented.<br />
• Introduce different media and events, such as films, theatre, concerts, performances, exhibitions<br />
etc., to deal with some of the more generic topics of this module, e.g. social engagement<br />
and responsibility, intercultural exchange and learning, changes and risks of intercultural<br />
co-operation etc. Please make sure that the all learners participate in and benefit<br />
from such informal learning activities.<br />
• Follow daily news on TV, radio, in newspapers etc. more intensively when they focus on social<br />
engagement, volunteering work, intercultural co-operation in this field as well as EU<br />
programmes. Sh<strong>are</strong> what you have heard and read about these issues with the whole project<br />
group and turn this news into a valuable learning experience.<br />
Correct answers to questions asked in this module<br />
4.1.2 Pictures from left to right: Leonardo da Vinci; John Amos Comenius; Desiderius<br />
Erasmus of Rotterdam; Nikolaj Frederik Severin Grundtvig<br />
4.1.2 Programmes: a = Comenius; b = Erasmus; c = Leonardo da Vinci; d = Grundtvig<br />
4.1.3. In 2009, Grundtvig has 10 components, 6 of them dedicated to mobility of staff and<br />
learners<br />
4.1.4. Case studies: 1 = Grundtvig Workshop; 2 = Grundtvig Senior Volunteering Project; 3<br />
= Grundtvig In-Service Training for Adult Education Staff; 4 = Grundtvig multilateral<br />
projects<br />
4.3.1. Tasks for actors:<br />
81
the Hosting Organisation’s tasks: 1, 7, 8, 9, 14, 18, 19, 24, 25<br />
the Sending Organisation’s tasks: 3, 6, 10, 11, 17, 20, 23<br />
the Senior Volunteer’s tasks: 2, 4, 5, 12, 13, 15, 21, 22<br />
4.4.1 Answers: 1-b; 2-a; 3-g; 4-e; 5-d; 6-c; 7-f<br />
4.4.2. True – false: a-false, b-true, c-false, d-true, e-true, f-false, g-true<br />
References and other sources helpful for further information<br />
(2007): <strong>Europe</strong> for Lifelong Learning; Brussels: Unit Coordination of Lifelong Learning programmes. (Leaflet available in 21<br />
languages)<br />
(2007): <strong>Europe</strong>an Social Reality. Report/Special Eurobarometer 273. <strong>Europe</strong>an Commission.<br />
(http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_273_en.pdf)<br />
(2007): Grundtvig. Success Stories/ <strong>Europe</strong> creates opportunities. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the <strong>Europe</strong>an<br />
Communities (Brochure available in 21 languages).<br />
(2008): Grundtvig - Adult education. Mobility creates opportunities/ <strong>Europe</strong>an success stories. Luxembourg: Office for Official<br />
Publications of the <strong>Europe</strong>an Communities. (Brochure available in De, En, Fr and Sl languages)<br />
(2009): Lifelong learning programme. Creativity and Innovation/Success stories. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications<br />
of the <strong>Europe</strong>an Communities (Brochure available in Cs, De, En, Fr languages, no paper version available)<br />
Application form for Senior Volunteering projects (available from the national agencies)<br />
Lifelong Learning Programme (LLP) - Guide 2009 – FICHES for each sub-programme<br />
(http://ec.europa.eu/education/llp/doc/call09/fiches_en.pdf)<br />
Lifelong Learning Programme (LLP) Guide 2009 (part 1 and 2)<br />
(http://ec.europa.eu/education/llp/doc/call09/part1_en.pdf )<br />
(http://ec.europa.eu/education/llp/doc/call09/part2_en.pdf )<br />
Lombardi, Erika/Pietro, Davide di (2006): Travelling abroad/International Volunteering Service Proposal for Senior Citizens;<br />
Rome: Lunaria (http://www.seven-network.eu/site/files/04%20Handbook%20en.pdf)<br />
Mazzeo, Arianna/Bertinelli, Alessandra (2005): Survey of best practices and training methodologies to involve senior volunteers<br />
in civil society organisations’ activities and projects: the cases of Italy and Austria.<br />
(http://www.seven-network.eu/site/files/1.Survey%20of%20best%20practices.pdf)<br />
Pietro, Davide di (2006): STILL ACTIVE! A guidebook for the Organizations of the Civil Society Interested in Hosting Senior<br />
Volunteers; Rome: Lunaria (http://www.seven-network.eu/site/files/6.Guidebook%20for%20organisation%20English.pdf;<br />
available in De, It, En, Fr)<br />
Pietro, Davide di (2006): STILL ACTIVE! Handbook for volunteers; Rome: Lunaria (http://www.sevennetwork.eu/site/files/10.Handbook_for_volunteers_english.pdf)<br />
Pietro, Davide di (2006): STILL ACTIVE! Training course for senior volunteers; Rome: Lunaria (http://www.sevennetwork.eu/site/files/14.training_course_Eng.pdf;<br />
available in De, En, Fr and It)<br />
http://ec.europa.eu/education/lifelong-learning-programme/doc78_en.htm<br />
(Lifelong Learning Programme)<br />
http://wikipedia.org<br />
(Wikipedia / free encyclopaedia)<br />
http://www.lebenslanges-lernen.at/<br />
(National Agency for Austria)<br />
http://www.ciriusonline.dk/<br />
(National Agency for Denmark)<br />
http://www.programmaleonardo.net/llp/index.asp<br />
(National Agency for Italy)<br />
http://www.anpcdefp.ro<br />
(National Agency for Romania)<br />
http://www.cmepius.si/<br />
(National Agency for Slovenia)<br />
http://www.oapee.es/<br />
(National Agency for Spain)<br />
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/education_culture/publ/educ-training_en.html#PDF<br />
(Catalogue of all the publications of the EC on the Lifelong Learning Programme)<br />
http://www.seven-network.eu<br />
(EU project and network for senior volunteer exchange projects)<br />
http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/index_en.htm<br />
(The <strong>Europe</strong>an Commission’s public opinion analyses homepage)<br />
www.ines.org/sci<br />
(Civil Service International - A world-wide peace movement)<br />
82
Module 4 – The Grundtvig Initiative on Volunteering in <strong>Europe</strong> for Seniors (GIVE)<br />
www.eurag-europe.org<br />
(<strong>Europe</strong>an federation for Older people – have been involved in volunteering projects)<br />
www.alliance-netwok.org<br />
(<strong>All</strong>iance of <strong>Europe</strong>an Voluntary Service Organisations)<br />
http://www.cev.be/1-news_home-RO.html<br />
(<strong>Europe</strong>an Volunteer Centre)<br />
http://ec.europa.eu/education/lifelong-learning-programme/doc1208_en.htm<br />
(List of National Agencies’ websites)<br />
http://ec.europa.eu/education/lifelong-learning-programme/doc86_en.htm<br />
(the Grundtvig programme of the EC’s official website)<br />
http://ec.europa.eu/education/grundtvig/doc986_en.htm<br />
(The GIVE sub-programme of the EC’s official website)<br />
http://www.seven-network.eu/site/q=en/node/240<br />
(GIVE partner organisation finder)<br />
http://www.seven-network.eu/site/q=node/248<br />
(Materials, handbooks, templates that can be used in the process of a senior volunteering exchange/GIVE project)<br />
http://www.schloss-bedheim.de<br />
(Location of a previous senior volunteering project)<br />
Dirty Pretty Things. Film by Stephen Frears (GB; 2002)<br />
East is East. Film by Damien O’Donnell (GB; 1999).<br />
Monsoon <strong>We</strong>dding. Film by Mira Nair (USA/IND/FR; 2001)<br />
83
Max Reisinger / Katrin Meister (VHS Graz/AT) /Michael Schwaiger (Auxilium/AT)<br />
Module 5:<br />
Unit 5.1.<br />
Unit in a nutshell<br />
The Art of Successful Project Proposal Writing II:<br />
Linguistic part<br />
General considerations concerning communication<br />
Participants become acquainted with the different levels and <strong>are</strong>as of<br />
communication<br />
Consideration of the difference between verbal and non-verbal communication<br />
Understanding essential features of intercultural communication<br />
Achievements<br />
After this unit you will be able to:<br />
understand why sometimes misunderstandings between two communication<br />
partners can occur and what they should pay attention to in order to<br />
avoid these<br />
be aw<strong>are</strong> of non-verbal signs, with regard to others as well as to oneself.<br />
If there is any one secret of success, it lies in the ability to get the other person's point of view<br />
and see things from that person's angle as well as from your own. (Henry Ford)<br />
Warming up:<br />
Two old friends, Mr. Red and Mr. Blue, meet after not having heard from each other for some months:<br />
Mr. Blue: Hi, how <strong>are</strong> you<br />
Mr. Red: Great – I was on vacation for the last two weeks; it was prefect:<br />
Mr. Blue: Oh, how I envy you – I can imagine exactly how it was:<br />
What can we deduct from this story, particularly in connection with an EU project proposal<br />
5.1.1. Means of communication<br />
Listen / Read / Discuss / Exercise<br />
Communication consists of an exchange of many individual messages. These messages <strong>are</strong> conveyed<br />
from one person (the sender) to another person (the receiver). A message must not necessarily consist<br />
of words and language. <strong>We</strong> can also communicate when we do not speak:<br />
84
Module 5 – The Art of Successful Project Proposal Writing II: Linguistic Part<br />
non-verbal<br />
(mimicking, gestures,<br />
silence)<br />
verbal<br />
(all forms that <strong>are</strong><br />
expressed with the help<br />
of words)<br />
Communication<br />
paraverbal<br />
(flow of words, speed of<br />
speech, length of<br />
pauses)<br />
extraverbal<br />
(clothing, smell,<br />
external characteristics)<br />
A person can express himself / herself non-verbally as well as verbally. Verbal signals must first be<br />
learnt in order to understand them and to be able to use them. This takes place in the first years of<br />
life. Our environment determines not only the accent and tone of our speech, but also the content<br />
which we connect with individual words. Thus when a mother in Sweden asks her child to think of a<br />
large animal the child would very likely think of a reindeer whereas a child in Africa might have an<br />
elephant in mind.<br />
However, our messages <strong>are</strong> not only be transported by different means, they can also include different<br />
information, background knowledge etc.<br />
Some linguists say that each message consists of up to four different aspects, which <strong>are</strong>:<br />
• the direct message, in which I pass on information<br />
• the self-disclosure message gives information about what is happening with me and what I<br />
want to be made known about me<br />
• the appeal states what I want of the other person<br />
• the indirect message, with which the sender conveys the relationship to the receiver<br />
For example, a person says to another person: “Can you lend me 20 Euros please”<br />
The direct message reads: I would like to borrow 20 Euros.<br />
The self-disclosure message says: I urgently need 20 Euros and I do not have them myself.<br />
The indirect message conveys: <strong>We</strong> have a close relationship and I would not borrow money from<br />
just any person.<br />
The appeal means: I would very much appreciate to be lent 20 Euros.<br />
Of course, it not always easy to differentiate between these four messages. However, usually the<br />
sender gives a message with these four aspects, which the receiver picks up. It can happen that the<br />
receiver does not pick up all four aspects of the message at the same level of intensity as that intended<br />
by the sender. It can also occur that the receiver does not understand or wrongly interprets<br />
one, more or even all aspects of the message – this is also called a misunderstanding!<br />
Persons, due to their life experience, apply their own ideas in a communication situation. Remember<br />
the short story above: Although the good friends both speak about a holiday they have a totally<br />
85
different concept in mind. So, from one point of view, communication is therefore nothing more<br />
than the exchange of subjective ideas – and one can only hope that this works!<br />
5.1.2. Intercultural communication<br />
When people communicate with each other and behave towards each other they <strong>are</strong> always being<br />
influenced by their own background. <strong>We</strong> all have a tendency to expect that the behaviour of foreigners<br />
corresponds with the rules of our own culture – however, it not always does. Quite often<br />
communication fails because we simply do not know which concepts exist in different cultures and<br />
how they <strong>are</strong> communicated.<br />
The following simple examples prove this:<br />
to tap on the head<br />
• In Italy, France and Germany this sign means, when looking at the other person, how stupid<br />
<strong>are</strong> you!<br />
• In England and Spain the same gesture relates to oneself and means Wow, I am clever!<br />
The OK – gesture in which the thumb and index finger form a circle<br />
• In America this gesture says everything is ok!<br />
• In Japan, as the gesture reminds one of a coin, it means so, now we can discuss finance!<br />
• In Southern France the gesture represents a nil and means worthless.<br />
• In many parts of Latin America, parts of <strong>Europe</strong> and Russia this gesture is extremely vulgar,<br />
being understood as a sexual gesture and is very insulting.<br />
With the index finger to beckon someone<br />
• This gesture is used in <strong>Europe</strong> and America to hail a person to come to oneself.<br />
• In Asia this gesture is used however only for dogs and prostitutes. The polite form is by repeatedly<br />
fanning with the right hand to signal “come here!”<br />
Discuss / Exercise<br />
However, although they might be important for successful information transfer, when we write an<br />
application we must forego non-verbal signs. What <strong>are</strong> the advantages and also disadvantages when<br />
we <strong>are</strong> limited to verbal language List some points below.<br />
Advantages<br />
☺________________________________<br />
☺________________________________<br />
☺________________________________<br />
☺________________________________<br />
☺________________________________<br />
☺________________________________<br />
☺________________________________<br />
☺________________________________<br />
Disadvantages<br />
☹_________________________________<br />
☹_________________________________<br />
☹_________________________________<br />
☹_________________________________<br />
☹_________________________________<br />
☹_________________________________<br />
☹_________________________________<br />
☹_________________________________<br />
Please do also watch the film about the topic of non-verbal communication on YouTube<br />
(www.youtube.com/watchv=RX3eBScTQNQ). This clip shows how different the same idea can be<br />
expressed in various countries with the aid of gestures. Are there any interesting gestures in your<br />
country Talk about them.<br />
86
Module 5 – The Art of Successful Project Proposal Writing II: Linguistic Part<br />
Unit 5.2.<br />
Unit in a nutshell<br />
Achievements<br />
Working with texts and writing an application<br />
Learning how to write in order to appeal to the feelings of the reader,<br />
and above all which feelings should be addressed when writing an application<br />
Becoming acquainted with the characteristics of different types of texts<br />
and formal criteria relevant for the application.<br />
After this unit you will be able to:<br />
define formal and content-based criteria of an application and differentiate<br />
it from other types of text<br />
appeal to the feelings of the project’s evaluator<br />
The limitations of language <strong>are</strong> the limitations of the world. (Ludwig Wittgenstein)<br />
Warming up:<br />
E_____________________<br />
U_____________________<br />
R_____________________<br />
O_____________________<br />
P_____________________<br />
E_____________________<br />
A_____________________<br />
N_____________________<br />
U_____________________<br />
N_____________________<br />
I _____________________<br />
O_____________________<br />
N_____________________<br />
For each letter choose a word beginning with that letter which is relevant to the topic “<strong>Europe</strong>an<br />
Union.” Form two groups, each writing a speech, whereby one group defends the values and activities<br />
of the <strong>Europe</strong>an Union and the second group argues against. It is important that the words you<br />
chose in the above exercise <strong>are</strong> included in the speech.<br />
Give the speeches and decide which arguments you would follow!<br />
5.2.1. The power of words<br />
Listen / Read / Discuss / Exercise<br />
Whoever works with text does not have any pictures at his disposal, which means that pictures must<br />
be formed through language. The writer must arouse ideas and pictures so that we can see, hear,<br />
smell, taste and feel what has been written.<br />
The writer of a text can awaken vivid memories in us and even trigger physical reactions. Just think<br />
of a freshly baked chocolate cake. Can you smell it Does your saliva start to flow Or imagine that<br />
you <strong>are</strong> sucking a juicy, large and very sour lemon. Can you feel the cavity of your mouth, how the<br />
corners of your mouth contract. Our feelings <strong>are</strong> linked to our imagination. For example if I portray<br />
a hungry child crying bitterly then it provokes our sympathy, whereas a child depicted as smiling<br />
causes us to show affection – without us actively needing to do anything.<br />
It is the power of the imagination, which can be incorporated into our whole body!<br />
This issue might also be important when writing a proposal, because evaluators <strong>are</strong> also human beings.<br />
In addition to consciously following the quality criteria, they will also evaluate your project<br />
unknowingly following their emotions and feelings.<br />
Bearing this consideration in mind, which of the evaluator’s feelings do you think you should appeal<br />
to when writing an application And which ones <strong>are</strong> best not to appeal to<br />
87
Feelings which should be appealed to:<br />
☺________________________________<br />
☺________________________________<br />
☺________________________________<br />
☺________________________________<br />
☺________________________________<br />
☺________________________________<br />
☺________________________________<br />
☺________________________________<br />
Feelings which should not be appealed to:<br />
☹_________________________________<br />
☹_________________________________<br />
☹_________________________________<br />
☹_________________________________<br />
☹_________________________________<br />
☹_________________________________<br />
☹_________________________________<br />
☹_________________________________<br />
Now think about your speeches and which feelings they addressed<br />
Positive feelings<br />
☺________________________________<br />
☺________________________________<br />
☺________________________________<br />
☺________________________________<br />
☺________________________________<br />
☺________________________________<br />
☺________________________________<br />
☺________________________________<br />
Negative feelings<br />
☹_________________________________<br />
☹_________________________________<br />
☹_________________________________<br />
☹_________________________________<br />
☹_________________________________<br />
☹_________________________________<br />
☹_________________________________<br />
☹_________________________________<br />
5.2.2. Different occasions – different texts<br />
Listen / Read / Discuss / Exercise<br />
When we transfer information to others verbally we choose different types of texts, depending on<br />
the situation, occasion, context, the receiver etc. What types of texts can you think of<br />
For example three types of text <strong>are</strong> fairy tale, poem and application. Each has its own characteristics.<br />
Please decide, with the aid of the so called differential diagram below, to what extent the<br />
characteristics listed below apply to these types of texts (indicate them with a cross in different<br />
colours):<br />
Fairy Tale<br />
Poem<br />
Application<br />
Structured O - O - O - O - O - O - O - O - O Unstructured<br />
Subjective perspective O - O - O - O - O - O - O - O - O Objective perspective<br />
real O - O - O - O - O - O - O - O - O fictitious<br />
Research is necessary<br />
before starting to<br />
write<br />
O - O - O - O - O - O - O - O - O<br />
Research is not necessary<br />
before starting to write<br />
Technical terminology O - O - O - O - O - O - O - O - O No technical terminology<br />
Set in future O - O - O - O - O - O - O - O - O Relates to the past<br />
Place and time <strong>are</strong><br />
Place and time <strong>are</strong> not<br />
O - O - O - O - O - O - O - O - O<br />
important<br />
important<br />
88
Module 5 – The Art of Successful Project Proposal Writing II: Linguistic Part<br />
5.2.3. Writing an application seen from a linguistic point of view<br />
Applications <strong>are</strong> specific types of text and therefore they should follow precise criteria and indicators.<br />
It is a special skill to put complex information into writing and to persuade a totally unknown<br />
person - very likely from a totally different country and with a totally different cultural background<br />
– by means of a text to give you money for something he / she has perhaps never heard of before in<br />
his / her life.<br />
Be aw<strong>are</strong> that not everybody is gifted with the ability to write successful proposals, and even if<br />
somebody is very good at writing poems or diaries, it does not necessarily mean that the same person<br />
is good at putting project ideas down on paper.<br />
However, it is very difficult to give recommendations about how to write a good proposal, because<br />
everyone (also every evaluator) will probably have their own preferences and ideas – nevertheless,<br />
we try to give you some (not only linguistic) hints for you to consider before starting to write an<br />
application.<br />
Successful proposal writing always starts with a thorough read through of the application<br />
details! One of the most common mistakes made is not going through all the details of the<br />
call and the application in the first place, in order to get an idea of what kind of projects<br />
the EC wants to be submitted (in terms of target groups, objectives, aims, duration, activities<br />
etc.)! Always follow these indicators and requirements – regardless of what you personally<br />
think concerning the requirements of an ideal project.<br />
Before you start writing make a basic plan of your project idea including all important activities,<br />
results, outputs etc. and try to structure them in rough – use this plan as a guideline<br />
and check it regularly!<br />
For a more detailed development try to work top-down instead of bottom-up. Start from<br />
the general frameworks and requirements of the programme and plan downwards to detailed<br />
activities and outcomes – this way you <strong>are</strong> making sure your project is always on solid<br />
ground.<br />
Usually you can submit your project in several languages (always in one of EN, DE or FR, and<br />
quite often also in any of the other official EU languages). If you choose a language other<br />
than your mother tongue you should really have excellent skills in that foreign language –<br />
otherwise you really <strong>are</strong> on thin ice!<br />
Do some basic research to get a better idea about your chosen topic and also to get a feeling<br />
for the circumstances associated with it in other counties or at the EU level – this is crucially<br />
important to the EU!<br />
Be authentic in whatever you <strong>are</strong> writing, which means write about things you understand<br />
yourself – experienced evaluators will find out very easily if you do have a good grasp of<br />
what you <strong>are</strong> writing about.<br />
Do not assume that your project idea and its frameworks <strong>are</strong> understood easily by others<br />
just because you understand them – be aw<strong>are</strong> that outside your region, country, culture,<br />
field of profession etc. and without any pre-knowledge, it might be extremely difficult to<br />
follow your descriptions and arguments.<br />
Write in clear and if possible short and understandable sentences – remember that an<br />
evaluator may read through hundreds of pages a day and therefore to make his / her task<br />
easier describe your main ideas clearly and concisely. (By the way, nowadays electronic application<br />
forms <strong>are</strong> quite often used which have character limitations for each section!)<br />
89
However, at the same time you need to describe and explain a complex topic, involving<br />
several partners and using a multi-level project process. This does all require a certain<br />
amount of space – so do not be too brief either! Such catch 22 situations <strong>are</strong> not unusual<br />
when writing a project application!<br />
Do not be afraid to use technical / professional terms as they underline your expertise,<br />
which is quite important too. However, do not overdo it and make sure the reader knows<br />
what is meant by them.<br />
For the same reason also try to structure your text properly, e.g. you can make your key<br />
messages clear by underlining, -) listing or writing in bold.<br />
Also redundancies <strong>are</strong> recommended but you will be in trouble if you push too hard. It is<br />
fine to remind the evaluator from time to time what the main ideas and outputs of your<br />
project <strong>are</strong> but he / she must not get the impression that you have run out of ideas and <strong>are</strong><br />
simply repeating things previously stated in the application.<br />
The application must be of the highest possible linguistic quality (grammar, orthography,<br />
expression etc.); regardless of fairness, it gives a poor impression if you <strong>are</strong> not able to<br />
write your application properly. Of course, an evaluator should not judge this aspect; however<br />
he / she may unknowingly become negatively influenced if it is poorly written.<br />
Further to what was said before, it makes sense for somebody with a high level of language<br />
skills and who has not yet been involved in the proposal writing to check through the application<br />
and improve the linguistic level – thus you have quality control over the linguistic<br />
quality as well as over the content and structure.<br />
Try to entertain the evaluator as best you can, meaning to make him / her interested in<br />
reading the proposal, to feel the spirit of the project group and to connect with your undertaking.<br />
After going through your proposal, the evaluator should have the feeling of having<br />
heard something new or even having learnt something new, and that your proposal is worth<br />
spending money on. This is a very important point for your project’s summary, which is usually<br />
on one of the first few pages of a proposal.<br />
Try to be definite about your planned activities, and do not put them into questions, e.g.<br />
we will do…, we will organise … and not: we might do …, very likely it will be organised …).<br />
If you <strong>are</strong> not convinced of what will happen in your project how should the evaluator be<br />
However, do also try to be as objective as possible when explaining your project and the<br />
problems / circumstances relating to why the project is necessary. The evaluator must not<br />
think that you <strong>are</strong> the only person who thinks positively about your project but that there is<br />
a general need for it. Therefore, persuade with expressions like As commonly known … or<br />
With regards to recent studies … instead of I am strongly convinced that … or <strong>We</strong> think it<br />
would be the best that … Of course your opinion and expertise also count in the evaluator’s<br />
eyes, but do try to underline them by using publications, bulletins, studies, media releases<br />
etc.<br />
Make sure you always indicate the most relevant information concerning your proposal (particularly<br />
in the summary); usually you simply need to follow the most important question<br />
words (also called W words), which <strong>are</strong>:<br />
What<br />
Why<br />
Who<br />
Where<br />
When<br />
90
Module 5 – The Art of Successful Project Proposal Writing II: Linguistic Part<br />
How long<br />
How much (concerning the budget)<br />
Start the application writing as early as possible; so that you do not run out of time and that<br />
you have some time left for proof-reading and evaluation before submission. However, due<br />
to some mystic law of nature, almost no applications <strong>are</strong> finished before the day of submission!<br />
What else do you think could be important Please add recommendations and hints:<br />
___________________________________________________________________________<br />
__________________________________________________________________________<br />
___________________________________________________________________________<br />
__________________________________________________________________________<br />
Exercise<br />
Basically there is not too much difference between writing proposals and writing newspaper articles.<br />
Both should be written professionally and be linguistically correct. They should inform about<br />
certain circumstances and key <strong>are</strong>as in an engaging way but without affecting too much. They<br />
should be structured and provide a good overview, and quite often both have to deal with space<br />
limitations. The only major difference is that the proposal tends to be about the future whereas an<br />
article would normally relate to the past.<br />
In any case people writing newspaper articles <strong>are</strong> professionals and should have highly developed<br />
language skills. Therefore, visit the editorial office of a local newspaper and discuss this issue with<br />
a professional editor; if necessary - the following questions may help you:<br />
1) What is the most difficult challenge in terms of formulating text in your profession<br />
2) In your opinion what differentiates a good text from a not so good text<br />
3) What should one without fail pay attention to when writing a text<br />
4) Can one learn to write good texts<br />
5) When you must write about a topic, which you <strong>are</strong> not particularly interested in, how <strong>are</strong> you still<br />
able to produce a good piece of text<br />
6) To what extent do you take into account potential intercultural interferences (misunderstandings<br />
caused by differences in cultural backgrounds) when writing your texts<br />
7) How relevant <strong>are</strong> topics concerning the <strong>Europe</strong>an Union for your work<br />
8) Would you write an article about our project Can we support you anyhow<br />
9) Other questions:<br />
91
Unit 5.3.<br />
Unit in a nutshell<br />
Achievements<br />
Advertising psychology meets application writing<br />
Considering some basic elements of advertising psychology<br />
Becoming acquainted with the interrelation between advertising and an<br />
application<br />
After this unit you will be able to:<br />
consider some psychological elements of advertising when writing an application<br />
identify which motives <strong>are</strong> important for an EU application and which <strong>are</strong><br />
not<br />
differentiate between topics which <strong>are</strong> in and those which <strong>are</strong> out in the<br />
EU project application world.<br />
The bait must be tasty for the fish and not for the angler. (Advertising saying)<br />
Warming up:<br />
One of the most common concepts attempting to explain<br />
the structure that man’s behavior follows is Maslow’s Pyramid,<br />
named after the famous American psychologist. It<br />
was always controversially discussed and today it seems to<br />
be somewhat out of date - nevertheless have a close look<br />
at the diagram on the left and discuss whether or not you<br />
can draw helpful conclusions from it.<br />
Listen / Read / Discuss / Exercise<br />
5.3.1. Basic considerations and their link to application writing<br />
Why do we buy And why do we opt for product A and not for B, or for idea X and not for Z<br />
These psychological decision making components <strong>are</strong> also relevant during the writing of an application,<br />
as they sell our product (the application) to a potential customer (the <strong>Europe</strong>an Commission or<br />
rather the evaluator), with the aim of it being preferred above other products (other applications).<br />
Therefore, it might be worth thinking about this once or twice before deciding upon your project<br />
concept.<br />
Motivation and incentives: Although the reasons and drivers for human behaviour is an extremely<br />
complex field and far away from being researched in depth, one can very generally say that man<br />
acts (= either doing something or not doing something – from a psychological point of view, both <strong>are</strong><br />
acting!) because of one or more internal motives meets one or more external incentives – together<br />
they result in the level of motivation to act.<br />
If we want to estimate whether somebody’s level of motivation to act, e.g. of an evaluator to approve<br />
or not approve a project application, is high or low, we need to consider that the following<br />
basic rules can be drawn up:<br />
• the lower the motive is developed, the higher the incentive must be<br />
• the higher the motive is developed, the lower the incentive can be<br />
For example, when a person has satisfied his / her thirst then a drink must appear very appetising<br />
for the person to want to drink it. However, when someone is really thirsty, then the he / she will<br />
drink almost anything without needing much convincing. Generally, the following basic motives <strong>are</strong><br />
considered to determine human behaviour:<br />
92
Module 5 – The Art of Successful Project Proposal Writing II: Linguistic Part<br />
fear wish for love belonging to a group autonomy moral feelings security faith<br />
eroticism individuality performance confidence traditions freedom vitality<br />
As this set of motives is valid for human behaviour it should also be relevant to the behaviour of<br />
evaluators in terms of selecting or not selecting your proposal for funding. What do you think Does<br />
this view make sense If yes, which of the motives listed above relate to an evaluator and should be<br />
addressed when writing a proposal<br />
more relevant<br />
☺________________________________<br />
☺________________________________<br />
☺________________________________<br />
☺________________________________<br />
☺________________________________<br />
☺________________________________<br />
☺________________________________<br />
less relevant<br />
☹_________________________________<br />
☹_________________________________<br />
☹_________________________________<br />
☹_________________________________<br />
☹_________________________________<br />
☹_________________________________<br />
☹________________________________<br />
As stated above, motives <strong>are</strong> only one side of the coin. The other side <strong>are</strong> incentives, which in this<br />
case would be your project, its objectives, activities and aims, target groups etc.<br />
One of the most important elements in this context is the general topic of your project. Of course,<br />
the importance of topics can differ from country to country (what is a problem in one country might<br />
not even exist in another, and what people from one culture would like to discuss might be stigmatised<br />
and frowned upon by others). However, you should make sure that your project’s topic, objectives<br />
and aims <strong>are</strong> in line with the general idea of the EU and its contemporary developments at the<br />
political, economic and social levels - therefore, it is important to be aw<strong>are</strong> of them!<br />
In the table below you will find some topics listed. Which of them do you think <strong>are</strong> most likely to<br />
receive funding from the EC If you <strong>are</strong> not sure, try to find out on the internet, in publications or<br />
contact local info points.<br />
Topics<br />
Successful migration<br />
People with disabilities<br />
<strong>Europe</strong>an citizenship<br />
Liberalisation of drug use<br />
New EU member states<br />
Senior citizens<br />
Cultural unity<br />
Preference to particular countries or groups of people<br />
The demographic development of society<br />
Linguistic unity<br />
Consideration to fringe groups in society<br />
Mobility and exchange between EU citizens<br />
Preservation of cultural stereotypes<br />
Equality of status for all persons<br />
Promotion of xenophobia<br />
Health<br />
Retaining different models and systems of education<br />
Creation of a unified Euro zone<br />
Smoke-free <strong>Europe</strong><br />
Euthanasia<br />
Further enlargement of the Union<br />
Very<br />
likely<br />
<br />
Don’t<br />
know<br />
No<br />
chance<br />
<br />
93
Listen / Read / Discuss / Exercise<br />
5.3.2. Some other helpful perspectives when writing a proposal<br />
Whether we <strong>are</strong> writing a job application, going to an interview or applying for a project - these <strong>are</strong><br />
all forms of advertising. Either we <strong>are</strong> advertising ourselves, a product, an idea or a project. Therefore<br />
it makes sense to learn from the professionals. Of course, it takes more than just considering a<br />
few key ideas to become a good advertising expert. However, the following three thoughts may help<br />
you when planning and writing an application.<br />
Determination of target group<br />
One must know the selected target group for a certain product or idea also when advertising oneself.<br />
Important factors determining the behaviour of a target group <strong>are</strong> gender, age, income level,<br />
social level, background, local environment, needs, profession, lifestyle, education, hobbies etc.<br />
When applying for a project, your target group is the EC and its evaluators, because it is mainly<br />
they who recommend that a project receives funding. These evaluators <strong>are</strong> usually not employed by<br />
the EC, but <strong>are</strong> subcontracted experts from all over <strong>Europe</strong> and anyone can apply for such a job<br />
(see http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/about/call_experts/call_experts_2007_en.php). This means that<br />
you never know who will evaluate your proposal; you neither know his / her nationality and cultural<br />
background, nor his / her gender or age and you also do not know if this person is an expert in the<br />
specific <strong>are</strong>a of your project’s topic. So, there <strong>are</strong> two questions, one can deduce from these circumstances:<br />
A) If it is not possible to foresee any of the factors mentioned above – <strong>are</strong> there any other indicators<br />
which <strong>are</strong> very likely to be given Which ones do you think and why<br />
B) How do you think these circumstances can influence the way you structure and write your<br />
proposal<br />
Uniqueness and distinctiveness of a project idea<br />
Connect a product, an idea or yourself with a characteristic, which makes it / you unique. This<br />
characteristic could represent something special or something typical in a person, a region or a subject.<br />
In the advertising world this is called the USP – Unique Selling Proposition. Of course, to claim<br />
a USP for oneself is not easy at all, but it is often attempted. Just think of the many hair shampoos<br />
which <strong>are</strong> all basically just for washing hair, but with much effort and imagination each of them<br />
tries hard to be unique and distinguishable from others through its own characteristics: Is it aimed<br />
at dandruff, greasy hair or fine hair It can be differentiated from others in the way it makes hair<br />
appear, the way it lathers up and its smell.<br />
So if it is possible for hair shampoos to be unique and distinguishable then it should be possible for<br />
your project to be so too. Therefore, be innovative or creative (or both!) when a) planning and b)<br />
describing your project. Do always consider that there <strong>are</strong> many other projects also wanting to be<br />
funded. Make sure what your USP is in comparison to all the others – What makes your project special<br />
Why will the EU or society be better off if your project is funded What is the added value of<br />
your project<br />
Can you think of concrete examples for such a USP when planning / writing a project<br />
Authenticity of partnership<br />
When trying to be unique and distinguishable never forget to remain authentic. It could be that you<br />
have a great innovative project idea with an excellent USP e.g. how to overcome the over-fishing of<br />
the <strong>Europe</strong>an seas by introducing ecologically sensitive open-sea fishing methods - but if you <strong>are</strong> an<br />
Austrian promoter and your partnerships consist of organisations from the Czech Republic, Hungary,<br />
94
Module 5 – The Art of Successful Project Proposal Writing II: Linguistic Part<br />
Slovakia and Switzerland, you might have trouble demonstrating the appropriate know-how and<br />
experience in this field.<br />
Of course, this might not always be fair to the product (Why should Austrians not have clever ideas<br />
about tackling the over-fishing of the seas), but authenticity and brand <strong>are</strong> important selling factors.<br />
Or would you by pizza from Greece, vodka from Spain, tea from Austria or wine from Latvia<br />
Therefore, be aw<strong>are</strong> that your partnership, its experience, its fields of expertise, its cultural background<br />
and your project in general should always demonstrate a high degree of authenticity in<br />
terms of the project topic.<br />
Exercise<br />
The Culture and Tourism Department for your town is awarding, in connection with its 700 th anniversary,<br />
a grant of 20,000 Euros to the most innovative project of the year on the topic of: How can<br />
I support my town with its <strong>Europe</strong>an identity<br />
Of course, you <strong>are</strong> interested in applying for this award on behalf of your organisation and you develop<br />
a draft project outline using the template below. Before starting with your work, please split<br />
into 6 groups with each group selecting one of the following identities, which also should be defined<br />
more in detail.<br />
a) a brewery b) a prison c) a hospital<br />
d) a religious group e) an elementary school f) a sports club<br />
Project Title<br />
Description of organisation<br />
(min. 500 characters)<br />
Objectives and aims<br />
(min. 500 characters)<br />
Target group(s)<br />
(min. 500 characters)<br />
Results and outcomes<br />
(min. 500 characters)<br />
Usage of fund<br />
(min. 500 characters)<br />
Why should your project be funded<br />
(min. 500 characters)<br />
Each group then presents its project outline to everyone. Discuss each of them and decide together<br />
who should receive the grant! To reach a clear result, we suggest that each group can award 5, 3<br />
95
and 1 points to 3 of the other projects (but not to their own one!). The project with the most points<br />
is the winner!<br />
Hints for additional activities supporting the module implementation<br />
• Use opportunities to leave the classroom or to bring in persons from outside your learning<br />
group as often as possible, e.g. visit the editor’s office of your local newspaper or meet professional<br />
advertising managers etc.<br />
• Do not forget to work and learn as creatively and actively as possible and use any relevant<br />
and reasonable types of media.<br />
References and other sources helpful for further information<br />
111 Kurz-Rezepte für den Deutsch-Unterricht (DaF)(2006). 1.Aufl., S.78f. Stuttgart: Ernst Klett.<br />
Birkenbihl, Vera F. (1995): Signale des Körpers/Körpersprache verstehen und Körpersprache einsetzen; S. 197, 204 ; Augsburg;<br />
<strong>We</strong>ltbild Verlag.<br />
De Saint-Exupéry, Antoine (1950): Der kleine Prinz. Zürich: Die Arche.<br />
Desmond, Morris (1996): Das Tier Mensch. S.16, 36. München: Wilhelm Heyne Verlag.<br />
Die Bibel. Das Buch Genesis (1986): Klagenfurt: Österreichisches Katholisches Bibelwerk.<br />
Gesteland, Richard R. (1999): Global Business Behavior/Erfolgreiches Verhalten und Verhandeln im internationalen Geschäft.<br />
S. 59; 79-82; Zürich: Orell Füssli Verlag.<br />
Greisinger, Manfred (1999): Ihr ICH als unverwechselb<strong>are</strong> Marke. Entwickeln Sie sich zu ihrem persönlichen PR-Manage! S.23,<br />
59. Wien/Waldviertel; Edition Sto<strong>are</strong>ich.<br />
Karmasin, Helene (1998): Produkte als Botschaften. 2.Aufl., S. 60, 61, 64-79. Wien: Ueberreuter Verlag.<br />
Linden, Peter (1996): Besser schreiben/Wie Wörter wirken. Publiziert in der Journalisten- <strong>We</strong>rkstatt. S. 12, 13. Hsg. vom<br />
MediumMagazin und dem Österreichischen Journalist Salzburg: Johann Oberauer GmbH.<br />
Linden, Peter (1997): Besser schreiben/Wie Texte wirken. Publiziert in der Journalisten- <strong>We</strong>rkstatt. S.2; 4-5; 9-1. hsg. vom<br />
MediumMagazin und dem Österreichischen Journalist. Salzburg: Johann Oberauer GmbH.<br />
Löhr, Jörg (2004): Lebe deine Stärken! Wie du schaffst, was du willst. 2.Aufl., S. 162-164. Econ Verlag.<br />
Marx, Karl (1969): Das Kapital. 3. Aufl., Augsburg, Ullstein Verlag.<br />
Simmons, Annette (2002): Story Faktor/Mit guten Geschichten Menschen gewinnen. S. 113-115. Stuttgart/München: Deutsche<br />
Verlags-Anstalt GmbH.<br />
Sturtz, Peter/<strong>We</strong>nd, Petra (2004): Geschäftsbriefe schnell und sicher formulieren S.13-19. Rudolf Haufe Verlag<br />
Toscani, Oliviero (1997): Die <strong>We</strong>rbung ist ein lächelndes Aas. S. 9-12, Frankfurt am Main: Fischer Verlag.<br />
Trout, Jack (2003): Differenzieren oder Verlieren. So grenzen Sie sich vom <strong>We</strong>ttbewerb ab und gewinnen den Kampf um die<br />
Kunden. S.90-93; 111-115; 135-137; 141-143; München: REDLINE Wirtschaft.<br />
Tselikas I, Elektra (1999): Dramapädagogik im Sprachunterricht. S.81. Orell Füssli Verlag.<br />
Walleczek, Sasha (2008): Die Walleczek Methode/Das Kochbuch. S.46, Wien: Ueberreuter Verlag.<br />
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akronym http://www.rp6/durchfuehrung/antragstellung/tipsantragstellung<br />
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interkulturalit%C3%A4t<br />
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redundanz<br />
http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/about/call_experts/call_experts_2007_en.php (EACEA’s calls for experts)<br />
http://www.web-akronym.de/index1024.html<br />
www.beziehungskiste.ch/themen/kommunikation.asp<br />
www.beziehungskiste.ch/themen/kommunikation.asp<br />
www.eberl.net/dk/Vortrag/d_4ohr.html<br />
www.markenslogan.com/start.html<br />
www.personal.uni-jena.de/p1erra/down/jap/scripts/yamanashi-%20Seminar%20(kommunikationsmodell).pdf<br />
www.rethoriksturm.de/kommunikationsmodell.php<br />
www.schulz-von-thun.de/mod.komquad.html<br />
www.suz.deutschdigital.de/deutsch/textsorten/index.phppmDeutsch&subpm=pmD6<br />
www.suz.deutschdigital.de/deutsch/textsorten/index.phppmDeutsch&subpm=pmD6<br />
www.youtube.com/watchv=RX3eBScTQNQ (film clip about “body language”)<br />
96
Module 6 – The Art of Successful Project Proposal Writing I: the Technical Part<br />
Module 6:<br />
Bettina Bussi/Patrizia Giorio (CO & SO Network/IT)<br />
The Art of Successful Project Proposal Writing I: the<br />
technical part 4<br />
Unit 6.1.<br />
Unit in a nutshell<br />
Achievements<br />
How to build a project group<br />
Profiling of the perfect project partner<br />
Profiling of the perfect project group<br />
Finding suitable partners and avoiding false friends<br />
Communicating with partners during the application period<br />
After this unit you will be able to:<br />
find new partners using existing different sources, such as websites, databases,<br />
events, networks etc.<br />
manage communications with partners in a variety of ways (“traditional”<br />
and very new ones)<br />
build a balanced partnership with a good mix of expertise<br />
sh<strong>are</strong> the responsibility of the project implementation with your partners.<br />
Building <strong>Europe</strong> and developing common <strong>Europe</strong>an solutions to common <strong>Europe</strong>an problems means<br />
co-operating with people, organisations and institutions in other member states, learning from<br />
each other and together developing new activities, practices and systems.<br />
(<strong>Europe</strong>an Commission’s Guide on Transnationality)<br />
Warming up:<br />
My personal experience about lifelong learning:<br />
Which countries <strong>are</strong> eligible for the<br />
Lifelong Learning Programme (LLP) and for<br />
the <strong>Europe</strong> for Citizens Programme (ECP)<br />
Legend:<br />
= the member states of the EU<br />
= <strong>Europe</strong>an countries<br />
= Candidate countries<br />
Listen / Read<br />
6.1.1. Finding appropriate partners for an EU project<br />
Working transnationally can be a very rewarding experience but it does depend upon establishing<br />
clear goals, strong partnerships and good management structures. Transnational working requires<br />
time, dedication and resources to develop it effectively. Choosing the right partners will determine<br />
the success of a project!<br />
You know this already from<br />
other partner decisions …<br />
… however, you should be also aw<strong>are</strong><br />
that the average divorce rate in<br />
<strong>Europe</strong> is about 48%!<br />
4 Relevant information and useful instruments can also be found in Module 7.<br />
97
Although a project partnership is not for ever but just for one or two years, do nevertheless take<br />
your time to design, select and build the best possible partnership to avoid future problems and a<br />
project that resembles a “War of the Roses”!<br />
How to build the<br />
perfect project team!<br />
Guidelines and Checklists<br />
A) Selection of partner organisation<br />
with respect to its …<br />
… skills and abilities in relation<br />
to the project topic<br />
Criteria, considerations, frameworks etc.<br />
Deduction / decision for partner selection<br />
… capabilities, capacity and<br />
potential<br />
… commitment, motivation and<br />
involvement<br />
… resources and finances<br />
… stability and track record<br />
… designated contact people<br />
within partner organisations<br />
… other factors:<br />
B) Design of partner group<br />
according to …<br />
… total numbers of partners<br />
needed<br />
Criteria, considerations, frameworks etc.<br />
Deduction / decision for partner selection<br />
… mixture of expertise<br />
… sizes and types of organisations<br />
… geographical scope and EU<br />
dimension<br />
… partners that have close<br />
links to beneficiaries<br />
… partners you have worked<br />
with before or who have been<br />
recommended<br />
… other factors:<br />
98
Module 6 – The Art of Successful Project Proposal Writing I: the Technical Part<br />
C) Finding new project partners<br />
by …<br />
… using existing institutional<br />
links, such as networking bodies,<br />
partnerships or work contacts<br />
etc.<br />
Opportunities, changes, risks, threats etc.<br />
Deduction / decision for partner search<br />
… taking advantage of local<br />
initiatives<br />
… using <strong>Europe</strong>an support organisations<br />
… logging onto <strong>Europe</strong>an partner<br />
search databases<br />
… attending partner-finding<br />
events organised by your own<br />
national agency<br />
… using other projects<br />
… other methods:<br />
D) Key success factors for<br />
cooperation in transnational<br />
project groups such as ….<br />
… building up an atmosphere of<br />
trust, understanding and respect<br />
Opportunities, changes, risks, threats etc.<br />
Deduction / decision for partner search<br />
… developing a sense of sh<strong>are</strong>d<br />
values and common goals and<br />
interests<br />
… defining and agreeing as a<br />
group the roles, responsibilities,<br />
timescales and expected outputs<br />
… fully involving all partners in<br />
all project steps and processes<br />
(as far as is reasonable)<br />
… implementing a reliable<br />
system of communication (using<br />
all available and suitable media<br />
and tools)<br />
… treasuring transp<strong>are</strong>ncy as a<br />
fundamental value in longdistance<br />
cooperation<br />
… other factor:<br />
… other factor:<br />
99
Exercise / Reflection / Research / Discussion<br />
In case you have already decided to apply for a specific project under one of the EU programmes<br />
please use tables A) and B) above for shaping and designing the partnership you need to implement<br />
the project.<br />
To find appropriate partners please follow the recommendations in table C) and check the following<br />
databases to gauge their usefulness:<br />
http://partbase.programkontoret.se<br />
www.bond.org.uk<br />
www.eurodesk.org/edesk/EUToolbox.dogo=7<br />
www.leonardo.org.uk/partnersearch<br />
http://crm.formez.it/crm/ricerca_partner/index.php<br />
According to the Survival Kit, developed as part of the Socrates programme, “activities that help in<br />
building a team” <strong>are</strong> …<br />
- getting to know each other as people<br />
- getting to know each other as professionals<br />
- getting to know the specific skills of each partner<br />
- getting to know the motives of the participants<br />
wishing to work in the project<br />
- getting to know the motives of each institution<br />
wishing to work in the project<br />
- giving the team a name<br />
- defining the main concepts and aims of the project<br />
- setting the evaluation criteria and methods<br />
- working with motivated and committed individuals<br />
and institutions<br />
- clearly defining roles and responsibilities<br />
- agreeing how to address conflict situations<br />
- sharing the ownership of the project<br />
- agreeing on basic rules for teamwork<br />
- reflecting on the work and progress of the team<br />
- using a suitable communication system<br />
- employing variable working methods at the meetings<br />
- recognising and sharing individual expertise<br />
- encouraging reserved members<br />
- celebrating milestones<br />
- dedicating enough time to social events<br />
- preventing isolation - through politics, age, economic<br />
circumstances, abilities relevant to the project, linguistic<br />
skills<br />
- guiding and leading – showing sensitivity towards the<br />
feelings of others<br />
Please discuss whether or not you agree or disagree with this list Is anything missing Is it possible,<br />
or even advisable, to rank these recommendations<br />
6.1.2. Cultural and language issues<br />
Listen / Read / Exercise<br />
Developing trust, knowledge and understanding within a group of transnational partners is essential<br />
for effective working. However, with cultural differences, geographical distances and language barriers<br />
this is one of the greatest challenges.<br />
The understanding of cultural differences, i.e. ways of doing business, levels of formality etc., together<br />
with having an open mind and a willingness to try different approaches is essential when<br />
building an effective transnational partnership. Depending on the countries involved, cultural differences<br />
can include distinctions at many levels, such as:<br />
- legal and financial systems<br />
- religious beliefs<br />
- holiday times and public holidays<br />
- levels of formality.<br />
What other kind of cultural differences could influence your project’s implementation Do you have<br />
your own experiences in connection with this<br />
100
Module 6 – The Art of Successful Project Proposal Writing I: the Technical Part<br />
Other critical issues in this context <strong>are</strong> the selection of an appropriate language and decent communications<br />
structures. It is essential to resolve issues relating to language and communication<br />
between the various partners at an early stage. Your partners will need to ensure that they possess<br />
adequate language skills and agree a working language. There also needs to be good communication<br />
and contact between the transnational partners. This may include informal networking as well as<br />
more formal means of communication.<br />
Nevertheless, even if you consider all of these issues there is no guarantee that you will avoid having<br />
some rough times with your project partners, as the following case study from the Craft Into<br />
Technology – Technology Into Craft project (UK/00/B/F/PP/129_106) highlights:<br />
The Project Manager, June J., learnt a great deal from the problems she encountered with the<br />
partnership itself. She not only had to devote much of her time to solving the various problems<br />
but was also concerned that these issues might have easily led to major difficulties with the<br />
project’s outcomes and budget.<br />
In this project it was discovered that Partner 1 was unable to complete the work it had agreed<br />
to carry out. The contact person at Partner 2 kept changing, which had consequences for the<br />
achievement of its aims. Partner 3 was unable to access the funding because of internal difficulties<br />
with its accountant and Partner 8 left the project before it started.<br />
Following discussions with the UK National Agency, the following solutions were found:<br />
after detailed discussions with the other partners Partner 1 was asked to leave the project<br />
and the contract was terminated. The partner’s work and budget were re-allocated<br />
between the remaining partners.<br />
with Partner 2 continuous efforts were made to establish and maintain contact with each<br />
new contact person, as their details became available. June informed each new person of<br />
the project’s aims and their organisation’s role, and sought to keep them up-to-date with<br />
the project and the work still to be carried out.<br />
June wrote formally to Partner 3’s accountant and through her perseverance the funding<br />
was eventually released to the partner.<br />
a replacement partner was found for Partner 8 and approved by the rest of the partnership.<br />
June’s recommendations to others <strong>are</strong> to:<br />
c<strong>are</strong>fully check out prospective partners<br />
have a contingency plan<br />
c<strong>are</strong>fully word partnership agreements<br />
ensure that partners understand and agree to their role.<br />
101
102<br />
What can you learn from this case study to help your own project plans
Module 6 – The Art of Successful Project Proposal Writing I: the Technical Part<br />
Unit 6.2.<br />
Unit in a nutshell<br />
Achievements<br />
The project plan<br />
Understanding its function and necessity<br />
Introduction of best practice instruments and methods<br />
Discussion of the key criteria for a good project plan<br />
Use of a project plan as a proactive management instrument<br />
After this unit you will be able to:<br />
develop a common management framework including project milestones<br />
and partner roles<br />
define a workplan that is coherent and consistent with the rest of the<br />
project application<br />
define a clear and realistic timescale for the whole duration of the project.<br />
The majority of project disasters <strong>are</strong> well planned way ahead<br />
(Jerry Maiden, NASA)<br />
Warming up:<br />
Where <strong>are</strong> we<br />
Although this diagram might not be in your<br />
mother tongue, try to figure out what it is<br />
about and what it says.<br />
6.2.1. How to develop a project plan<br />
Listen / Read<br />
As each project is a complex and unique process comprehensive and thorough planning is crucial in<br />
order to work towards the aims in an effective way. Before drafting the application it is useful to<br />
start scheduling activities and make a schematic and visual presentation of the project. The following<br />
elements and steps should be considered:<br />
Step 1: Project content<br />
Define the project aims, objectives, outcomes, products and quality indicators, following …<br />
the Project Cycle Management (PCM) (see above)<br />
the Logical Framework Approach (LFA), which helps you to build a logical framework<br />
that support partners to discuss and think through all of the implications<br />
Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic and Timebound objectives (= SMART)<br />
Define monitoring and evaluation strategies (see below)<br />
Step 2: Planning the organisation of the project<br />
Divide the project into phases and structure the main activities; break the project down into<br />
distinct phases, such as:<br />
start up phase: recruiting the project team for partnership<br />
103
ealisation phase: transnational activities <strong>are</strong> an integral part of the overall aims<br />
of the project and <strong>are</strong> not just fringe activities<br />
co-ordination phase: monitoring, dissemination, evaluation, financial<br />
management and reporting<br />
finalisation phase: the partners consider their next steps or exit strategy<br />
for the project<br />
State which partners will be involved and who has responsibility for the delivery of specific<br />
tasks<br />
Link the workplan and its tasks to a timetable<br />
estimate how much time will be involved and set a deadline for completion<br />
plan for the whole duration of the project<br />
make sure timescales <strong>are</strong> realistic<br />
Devise a coherent workplan: in a well defined workplan all the activities, results and deadlines<br />
must be clearly described and scheduled<br />
Step 3: Financial and administrative planning<br />
Lastly, task scheduling should integrate the costs data for each task: planning costs and resources,<br />
designing contractual arrangements, devising reporting systems and procedures (see<br />
Unit 5).<br />
Listen / Read / Exercise<br />
One of the greatest challenges in connection with designing a project plan is the necessity to define<br />
a problem, a desirable solution and a solution finding process in the first place. The method described<br />
below, adapted from a business development approach, may be of some help to you.<br />
The Problem and Objective Assessment<br />
By this method, problem solving should be made easier by reformulating problems into objectives. Therefore, the problem<br />
assessment identifies and organises problems which you can then work with. The objective assessment identifies and organises<br />
objectives in direct relation to the problems. In this approach, objectives <strong>are</strong> desired future situations, not activities.<br />
An activity will use verbs such as to improve, reduce, construct and so on. However, an objective is a description of what it<br />
will be like once something has been improved, reduced, constructed etc. When formulating an objective it is often simply<br />
a matter of turning the problem statement around, or imagining a completely new situation as the example below shows.<br />
Preparation and implementation work:<br />
1. Each participant involved receives two set of coloured cards: some yellow cards on which the problems should be<br />
indicated and some green ones for formulating the objectives (important: do not write activities but describe<br />
situations!).<br />
2. Arrange an appropriate timescale for formulating problems and objectives.<br />
3. After this work is finished, all yellow and green cards <strong>are</strong> put into two columns on a poster or pin board, leaving<br />
space for a middle column (see Stage 1 below; important: yellow problem cards and green objective cards dealing<br />
with the same issues should always be placed opposite each other).<br />
4. Once all the problem cards <strong>are</strong> covered by at least one objective card, try to assess the hierarchy of the problems<br />
(which is the largest problem of all) as well as the hierarchy of objectives (which objective is most desired / important<br />
to be achieved) dealing with each problem.<br />
5. Now you should have a ranking on the left hand side beginning with the largest problem, and a ranking on the<br />
right hand side beginning with the most desired objective replacing a problem. Perhaps there <strong>are</strong> some gaps<br />
within the hierarchy of problems as well as within the hierarchy of objectives. In this case you may need to reorganise<br />
your hierarchies or even to define problems as well as objectives in more detail (however, it is essential<br />
that you do not lose sight of the original problem).<br />
6. After you have agreed on a set of appropriately ranked problems and objectives, try to fill in the middle column<br />
with actions that can overcome the problems and achieve the objectives. These activities, which <strong>are</strong> most likely<br />
to change the largest problem into the best objective, might be the basis for your project plan! (see Stage 2 below)<br />
NOTE: This is a free-flowing exercise which can be re-started at any stage of the process; each person involved can write<br />
any objective for any problem. There is no limit to the numbers of cards that can be written.<br />
104
Module 6 – The Art of Successful Project Proposal Writing I: the Technical Part<br />
Stage 1<br />
Problems<br />
Lack of senior citizens<br />
participating in AEC<br />
Objectives<br />
Senior citizens fully engaged in<br />
volunteer work<br />
Senior citizens take over responsibility traditionally<br />
covered by professionals/younger<br />
people<br />
Senior citizens actively involved in<br />
decision making processes concerning<br />
AEC<br />
Too few senior citizens<br />
actively involved in EU<br />
projects<br />
Percentage of EU projects dealing<br />
with senior citizens issues reflect<br />
roughly their demographic force<br />
Senior citizens <strong>are</strong> fully aw<strong>are</strong> of EU funding<br />
opportunities<br />
Senior citizens <strong>are</strong> equally represented in EU<br />
project groups<br />
Senior citizens <strong>are</strong> involved in decision<br />
making processes when creating new funds<br />
and programmes<br />
Stage 2<br />
Problems Actions Objectives<br />
Lack of senior citizens<br />
participating in AEC<br />
• Introduce AEC better to seniors<br />
• Adapt volunteer work structures<br />
to better suit the needs<br />
and demands of seniors<br />
• Prep<strong>are</strong> senior citizens better for<br />
volunteer work by increasing<br />
training programmes for them<br />
• Involve more seniors in management/<br />
at board level<br />
• Etc.<br />
Senior citizens fully engaged in<br />
volunteer work<br />
Senior citizens take over responsibility traditionally<br />
covered by professionals/younger<br />
people<br />
Senior citizens actively involved in<br />
decision making processes concerning<br />
AEC<br />
Too few senior citizens<br />
actively involved in EU<br />
projects<br />
• Develop training course to<br />
increase project management<br />
skills of seniors<br />
• Increase promotional activities<br />
concerning EU programmes<br />
specific to this target group<br />
• establish more programmes<br />
particularly dedicated to the<br />
needs and demands of senior<br />
citizens<br />
• <strong>All</strong>ow senior citizens better<br />
access to decision making processes<br />
and committees<br />
• Etc.<br />
Percentage of EU projects dealing<br />
with senior citizens issues reflect<br />
roughly their demographic force<br />
Senior citizens <strong>are</strong> fully aw<strong>are</strong> of EU funding<br />
opportunities<br />
Senior citizens <strong>are</strong> equally represented in EU<br />
project groups<br />
Senior citizens <strong>are</strong> involved in decision<br />
making processes when creating new funds<br />
and programmes<br />
105
Listen / Read / Exercise<br />
6.2.2. How to define monitoring strategies<br />
Project management must keep track of how the project is progressing in terms of expenditure,<br />
resource usage, implementation of activities, delivery of results, risk management etc. This is<br />
achieved through monitoring, which is the systematic and continuous collection, analysis and use of<br />
management information to support effective decision-making.<br />
Monitoring the project activities as well as the administrative and financial <strong>are</strong>as is important in<br />
terms of being able to demonstrate that your project has achieved the aims and objectives stated in<br />
the application.<br />
Monitoring is an internal management responsibility, although it may be complemented by external<br />
monitoring inputs. These external monitoring inputs can be useful in providing objective verification<br />
of results, additional technical advice and a big-picture view for management.<br />
Therefore, it is crucial for a successful project implementation to:<br />
choose the appropriate levels of monitoring according to the type of project<br />
work out the information needed to be collected during the project<br />
sh<strong>are</strong> the relevant rules with all the partners so that everyone has the right information<br />
The Logical Framework<br />
When designing a project plan, the Logical Framework may be a useful tool for you. It is structured as follows:<br />
objectives indicators evidence assumptions<br />
overall<br />
outcome<br />
1<br />
7<br />
8<br />
partner<br />
purpose<br />
2 9<br />
10 6<br />
outputs<br />
3 11 12 5<br />
activities<br />
13<br />
14<br />
15<br />
16<br />
preconditions<br />
4<br />
The following sequences should be respected in order to use the logical framework appropriately:<br />
1. The objectives column is filled in first by working from the top to the bottom of the blue boxes 1-3<br />
2. The assumptions column is filled in second by working from the bottom (!) to the top filling in the green boxes 4<br />
(preconditions), 5 and 6. The relation between the objectives and the assumptions estimates the level of risk.<br />
The assumptions column includes internal and external factors (partly outside your control) that affect your success<br />
and tests them against the logic of the objectives.<br />
3. Next, follow the indicators and evidence columns to establish the basis for measuring the effectiveness and clarity<br />
of the objectives. Therefore, fill in red box 7 and yellow box 8, then red boxes 9 and 10 followed by yellow<br />
boxes 11 and 12 – please keep to this order.<br />
4. Finally, fill in the activity row (pink boxes 13-16) by keeping in mind that the objectives, and not the activities,<br />
should lead the project. The activities must not be seen as the result of a project but as way to achieve the results,<br />
which <strong>are</strong> the objectives.<br />
Use this instrument when designing your project plan and discuss in a group about the strengths and<br />
weaknesses of the project plan too. Can you formulate any recommendations for improvement<br />
106
Module 6 – The Art of Successful Project Proposal Writing I: the Technical Part<br />
Unit 6.3.<br />
Unit in a nutshell<br />
Achievements<br />
The evaluation plan<br />
Understanding the function and necessity of evaluation<br />
Introduction of best practice instruments and methods<br />
Discussion of key criteria for good project evaluation<br />
Understanding levels, perspectives and stakeholders of evaluation<br />
After this unit you will be able to:<br />
understand the purposes of evaluation<br />
distinguish between internal and external evaluation<br />
distinguish between quantitative and qualitative indicators<br />
develop an effective evaluation strategy for your project.<br />
In God we trust. <strong>All</strong> others must bring data. (Robert Hayden)<br />
Warming up:<br />
Our life is determined by evaluation processes and instruments much more<br />
than we think. Sometimes they <strong>are</strong> more standardised and official, e.g.<br />
exams at schools, taking a driving test, or applying for a passport etc., and<br />
sometimes they <strong>are</strong> based more on very personal factors and have unofficial<br />
character, such as when we evaluate a person as being more or less loveable,<br />
when we choose our holiday destination or meals in restaurants etc.<br />
Can you think of some more examples of evaluation in daily life Is evaluation<br />
necessary to give us a clear picture of the world – and is it able to do<br />
so<br />
6.3.1. Character and purposes of evaluation<br />
Listen / Read / Research / Discuss<br />
For most project coordinators the process of evaluating a <strong>Europe</strong>an project begins as they construct<br />
their application for funding and make their bid to the <strong>Europe</strong>an Commission. However, for many<br />
projects the real implementation of an evaluation strategy will begin with the first project meeting.<br />
Measuring the impact of a project is not easy; it is much more straightforward to measure the outputs,<br />
such as publications, courses, websites etc.<br />
Work already carried out on the evaluation of projects indicates that the most productive form of<br />
evaluation is one which involves all the project partners, begins with the project itself and is a result<br />
of debate and agreement within the partnership. Above all, evaluation is a process that must<br />
not be left to the final stages of the project! Nevertheless one must understand that successful project<br />
evaluation requires a lot of experience, know-how, skills and, last but not least, hard work. As<br />
a start to this topic please try to define and clarify the following key elements dealing with evaluation:<br />
What kind of methods and instruments of<br />
evaluation do you know<br />
Do you have experiences with them Do you<br />
know about their advantages and disadvantages<br />
What kind of quantitative and qualitative<br />
indicators in connection with project<br />
evaluation can you think of<br />
Internal and external evaluation – what<br />
could these be and how do they differ from<br />
each other<br />
107
Please identify and formulate as many methods, indicators, evaluators and milestones for the three<br />
main <strong>are</strong>as of project evaluation: output/results – process/workflow - dissemination/implementation<br />
Areas and issues of evaluation<br />
Issues<br />
Methods/instruments<br />
Indicators<br />
evaluators<br />
quantitative qualitative internal external<br />
time/frequency<br />
Learning materials<br />
Training activities<br />
Project Outputs<br />
website<br />
Dissemination<br />
materials<br />
Aw<strong>are</strong>ness strategy<br />
Conferences,<br />
seminars, workshops<br />
etc.<br />
Other:<br />
Other:<br />
Project meetings<br />
Work phases<br />
Process and workflow<br />
Time/crisis management<br />
Information flow and<br />
management<br />
Organisation work<br />
for training, conferences,<br />
workshops<br />
etc.<br />
Cooperation between<br />
partners<br />
Cooperation with the<br />
<strong>Europe</strong>an Commission<br />
Other:<br />
Other:<br />
Relevance of<br />
products<br />
Dissemination and impact<br />
Acceptance of<br />
products by target<br />
groups/stakeholders<br />
Quantity and Quality<br />
of dissemination<br />
activities<br />
Post-project scenarios,<br />
e.g. Intellectual<br />
Property Rights<br />
Potential of sustainability<br />
and sustainable<br />
use of products<br />
Conferences,<br />
seminars, workshops<br />
etc.<br />
Other:<br />
Other:<br />
108
Module 6 – The Art of Successful Project Proposal Writing I: the Technical Part<br />
Due to the importance of continuous project monitoring and evaluation the following key principles<br />
should be undertaken by the partners from the beginning:<br />
Agree as a group how you will monitor and evaluate your project and how your monitoring<br />
mechanism should function!<br />
Be clear what you mean by evaluation and promote its benefits. Some partners may not be<br />
very familiar with evaluation activities and could view them with suspicion!<br />
Make sure that everybody involved understands that evaluation and monitoring <strong>are</strong> essential<br />
to identify whether or not the project is still on track at any stage of its lifetime. This also<br />
helps to analyse where problem <strong>are</strong>as in the project <strong>are</strong>, and the process should be the basis<br />
for taking decisions about how to continue with the future implementation of the project.<br />
Be clear from the outset what information you require from the partners, in what format<br />
and by when!<br />
Unit 6.4.<br />
Unit in a nutshell<br />
Achievements<br />
The dissemination plan<br />
Understanding the function and necessity of dissemination<br />
Introduction of best practice instruments and methods<br />
Discussion of key criteria for good project dissemination<br />
Understanding levels, perspectives and stakeholders of dissemination<br />
After this unit you will be able to:<br />
develop a comprehensive dissemination strategy from the outset of the<br />
project until its end<br />
define the target audience for dissemination activities<br />
define how to sustain the project’s results after the end of the project.<br />
No man is an Island, entire of itself; every man is a piece of the Continent, a part of the main; if<br />
a clod be washed away by the sea, <strong>Europe</strong> is the less. (John Donne)<br />
Warming up:<br />
What do you think the tangible and intangible outputs of an<br />
EU project could be<br />
Why do you think the <strong>Europe</strong>an Commission places great emphasis<br />
on the importance of the dissemination activities<br />
6.4.1. Purpose of dissemination and exploitation activities<br />
Listen / Read<br />
The results generated, the lessons learned and the experience gained by each project team should<br />
be made available to the widest possible audience.<br />
The primary means of making this happen <strong>are</strong> the twin activities of dissemination and exploitation,<br />
also known together as valorisation. Their key objective is to maximise the impact of project results<br />
by optimising their value, strengthening their impact, transferring them to different contexts, integrating<br />
them in a sustainable way and using them actively in systems and practices at the local,<br />
regional, national and <strong>Europe</strong>an levels.<br />
109
The different categories of results may require different approaches for dissemination and exploitation.<br />
For example, tangible results, such as products, may be easily demonstrated by actual items,<br />
graphical representations and samples, whereas intangible results, such as experiences, may require<br />
alternative methods to demonstrate them, perhaps by using survey results, interview analysis<br />
or accreditation programmes.<br />
Generally, there <strong>are</strong> many different formal and informal possibilities as well as a huge variety of<br />
methods and tools available to disseminate EU projects, such as events, workshops, seminars and<br />
conferences.<br />
Specific websites for dissemination 5 ; you can create posters, brochures, leaflets, logos, websites,<br />
newsletters, films and other promotional materials; you can (and should) use mass media (TV, radio,<br />
newspapers, magazines etc.) … there <strong>are</strong> no limits. However, whichever way you go, please<br />
never forget to indicate that your project is funded by the EC and do always indicate the project<br />
number and the logo of the particular EU Programme.<br />
The main general aim of EC project policy is for project outcomes and results to be used in a sustainable<br />
way. However, it does not mean that the products can be used for free purely because<br />
their development was funded by the EC. You <strong>are</strong> entitled to register your Intellectual Property<br />
Rights (IPR) if you choose to do so. Finally, your project products can have varying levels of status,<br />
such as full copyright, “some rights reserved” copyright but also in public domain (no rights reserved).<br />
However, this is a complex issue, and it might be worth consulting experts to be better<br />
informed about it.<br />
Last but not least, it needs to be underlined that having a strong and tailor-made dissemination and<br />
exploitation plan implemented from the very beginning of a project is a key priority and will be<br />
very intensively evaluated during the approval process of your project application. Therefore, it is<br />
recommended to consider very c<strong>are</strong>fully at which stage of the project you can disseminate or exploit<br />
what to whom and how.<br />
The table below, based on a list from the 2007 LLP Project Handbook introducing possible project<br />
objectives, may help you in structuring your <strong>are</strong>as of activities, the objectives of dissemination, the<br />
choice of methods and instruments and your potential target groups.<br />
Products<br />
Methods, tools and means of<br />
dissemination<br />
Target groups of dissemination<br />
Time/duration/frequency of<br />
dissemination/implementation<br />
reports and comparative<br />
studies<br />
innovative education<br />
and training modules<br />
new curricula and<br />
qualifications<br />
guidance material for<br />
new approaches and<br />
methodologies<br />
online education and<br />
training material (elearning)<br />
conferences and cultural<br />
events<br />
seminars, debates<br />
and symposia<br />
110<br />
5 Such as the database for Leonardo da Vinci projects ADAM (www.adam-europe.eu) or the non-profit association <strong>Europe</strong>an<br />
Network for Transfer an Exploitation of EU Project Results (E.N.T.E.R.) www.enter-network.eu.
Module 6 – The Art of Successful Project Proposal Writing I: the Technical Part<br />
Methods<br />
increased knowledge<br />
of the participants<br />
within a certain field<br />
or topic<br />
Methods, tools and means of<br />
dissemination<br />
Target groups of dissemination<br />
Time/duration/frequency of<br />
dissemination/implementation<br />
cooperation processes<br />
and methodologies<br />
managerial lessons<br />
learned and knowhow<br />
exchange of ideas<br />
and good practice<br />
Experiences<br />
experience gained by<br />
the project partners<br />
in the management<br />
and undertaking of<br />
transnational partnerships<br />
experience gained by<br />
individuals, e.g. from<br />
mobility periods<br />
exchange of experience<br />
and best practice<br />
through the establishment<br />
of networks<br />
Methods, tools and means of<br />
dissemination<br />
Target groups of dissemination<br />
Time/duration/frequency of<br />
dissemination/implementation<br />
Policy lessons<br />
drawn from the overall<br />
experience of projects<br />
within a programme<br />
or from individual<br />
projects that<br />
<strong>are</strong> particularly innovative<br />
or effective<br />
feedback to inform<br />
policy making e.g. in<br />
the Lifelong Learning<br />
field within the<br />
Commission and<br />
within member states<br />
Methods, tools and means of<br />
dissemination<br />
Target groups of dissemination<br />
Time/duration/frequency of<br />
dissemination/implementation<br />
EU Cooperation<br />
new or extended<br />
<strong>Europe</strong>an partnerships<br />
transnational sharing<br />
of experience and<br />
best practice<br />
cross-cultural dialogue<br />
and cooperation<br />
new dialogue and<br />
partnerships between<br />
EU and non-EU countries<br />
Methods, tools and means of<br />
dissemination<br />
Target groups of dissemination<br />
Time/duration/frequency of<br />
dissemination/implementation<br />
111
Unit 6.5.<br />
Unit in a nutshell<br />
Achievements<br />
The Project budget<br />
Definition of headings, categories and lump sum budgets<br />
Understanding how to link a budget to a project plan and partner activities<br />
Learning how to properly cost a project<br />
Distinguishing between dynamic and static budgets<br />
After this unit you will be able to:<br />
distinguish between headings, categories and lump sum budgets<br />
link the budget to the project plan and the partner activities<br />
properly cost a project<br />
A budget is just a method of worrying before you spend money, as well as afterwards. (Unknown)<br />
Warming up:<br />
In every project meeting we talk about financial issues. In actual fact we<br />
devote about half of our time to these questions. But still our partners regularly<br />
ask for clarification or for more information about eligible costs, payments,<br />
reporting etc. (Coordinator of a Comenius project)<br />
How do you think one can avoid such inconvenient and disruptive situations<br />
Listen / Read<br />
6.5.1. Budgetary framework and planning<br />
Depending on the programme or action you <strong>are</strong> applying to, you need to calculate an estimated<br />
budget by using frameworks and forms provided by the EC. Budgeting methods can vary from one<br />
programme to another; however there <strong>are</strong> basically two different concepts of budgets:<br />
- line item budget: this budget contains estimated details of all planned expenses and revenues,<br />
classified by different headings such as staff, travel and subsistence, equipment, subcontracting<br />
or other costs. When submitting a proposal you need to provide the EC with a<br />
detailed financial plan with all individual data for expenses (usually, including costs for<br />
every single working day of each partner organisation, each page that will be translated,<br />
each journey to be made etc.).<br />
Such a budget usually requires much experience and effort in its calculation as well as in its<br />
administration.<br />
- lump sum budget: In this case, the budget is calculated by defined lump sums paid on the<br />
basis of the usage of defined items, e.g. a certain sum for each kilometre travelled or for<br />
each working day spent at a project event etc.<br />
Since lump sum budgets <strong>are</strong> not broken down into detailed items of expenditure, less effort<br />
and experience is needed for their calculation and administration.<br />
However, please be aw<strong>are</strong> that both budgets <strong>are</strong> understood by the EC as being estimations.<br />
Final payments will only be made on the basis of real expenses or items actually used in<br />
connection with the project implementation.<br />
112
Module 6 – The Art of Successful Project Proposal Writing I: the Technical Part<br />
Research / Discuss<br />
Calculating budgets is always a tricky issue when preparing a project application, and there <strong>are</strong><br />
always two major challenges connected with this issue: a) the calculation of the budget and b) the<br />
administration of the budget (accounting, declaration of costs, payments etc.).<br />
The good news is that the application documents usually provide you with – more or less - detailed<br />
instructions as well as with a calculation tool (a word or an excel file), both of which can be<br />
downloaded from the websites of the various programmes!<br />
Now, please look up the websites of the following programmes and try to find all relevant documents<br />
and information in connection with budgeting.<br />
a) LLP/Grundtvig/Multilateral project<br />
b) ECP/Active Citizens for <strong>Europe</strong>/Measure 1.1. Town Twinning project<br />
Comp<strong>are</strong> both sets of financial frameworks and budget calculation instruments and discuss the advantages<br />
and disadvantages as well as the opportunities and risks in connection with calculating and<br />
administrating them!<br />
Grundtvig/Multilateral Project<br />
Active Citizens for <strong>Europe</strong>/Town Twinning<br />
Advantages<br />
/opportunities<br />
Advantages/<br />
opportunities<br />
Disadvantages/risks<br />
Disadvantages/risks<br />
After working through these documents you may have found technical expressions and terms which<br />
you <strong>are</strong> not fully familiar with. However, since a good knowledge of relevant terminology is critical<br />
when working with EU funds, please try to explain the following expressions (if necessary, please<br />
feel free to use any kind of assistance!):<br />
Term<br />
eligible / non-eligible costs<br />
Explanation<br />
direct / indirect costs<br />
(how to deal with) revenues<br />
(exempt from) Value Added Tax (VAT)<br />
(percentage of) co-funding<br />
(percentage of) self-contribution / own<br />
funding<br />
Ceilings for daily rates<br />
Regulation of (party) pre-financing<br />
Instalments<br />
Final payment<br />
Other: ______________________________<br />
Other:______________________________<br />
113
Hints for additional activities supporting the module implementation<br />
• Plan a cooking session during which several dishes from different EU countries <strong>are</strong> prep<strong>are</strong>d<br />
by the whole learner group. Understand this task as mainly being a project management<br />
challenge, which you should tackle by applying knowledge and skills you have just acquired<br />
in this module. 6 Therefore,<br />
• agree on quantitative and qualitative frameworks (when, where, and what to be cooked Is<br />
there a financial limit Should anybody be invited etc.)<br />
• define activities and split them between participants<br />
• agree on a timescale and budget plan<br />
• do not forget evaluation and perhaps even dissemination activities<br />
• have fun and – bon appétit!<br />
• Again, use opportunities to leave the classroom, e.g. visit an EU project group whilst it is<br />
working, or bring in persons from outside your learning group as often as possible, such as<br />
experienced project managers, representatives from EU programme offices or info points<br />
from your region etc.<br />
• Do not forget to work and learn as creatively and actively as possible and use any relevant<br />
and reasonable types of media.<br />
References and other sources helpful for further information<br />
Bienzle, Holger (Ed.) (2002): A Survival Kit for <strong>Europe</strong>an Project Management. Advice for Coordinators of Centralised Socrates<br />
Projects. 2nd edition: Wien. Büro für Europäische Bildungskooperation/SOKRATES.<br />
Development DG (2004): Project Cycle Management Guidelines. Volume 1. pp. 158. Brussels.<br />
Directorate General Education and Culture (2009): Grundtvig Senior Volunteering projects – Tips and resources for a good<br />
project pp. 11-12. Brussels.<br />
Directorate-General for Education and Culture the EU's 5-stage plan for dissemination and exploitation. Brussels.<br />
Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities (2005): EQUAL Guide on Transnational Cooperation<br />
2004-2008; <strong>Europe</strong>an Communities.<br />
ECOTEC Research & Consulting Ltd, LLP UK National Agency (2007): Learning Together - How to work effectively with partners<br />
and get the best out of your <strong>Europe</strong>an project. Birmingham.<br />
Forum on Partnerships and Local Governance (2006): Successful Partnerships - A Guide. OECD LEED Editor.<br />
Leonardo UK National Agency (2003): Transnational Partnership Guidance Note for Leonardo da Vinci Projects. London.<br />
Sida - Methods Development Unit (2003): The Logical Framework Approach. Edita Sverige.<br />
The GB Equal Support Unit (2006): Transnationality – a guide for Development Partnerships. Birmingham.<br />
The GB EQUAL SUPPORT UNIT: A Project Cycle Management and Logical Framework Toolkit. London.<br />
http://creativecommons.org/about<br />
http://crm.formez.it/crm/ricerca_partner/index.php<br />
(partner search database at EU and global levels for EU/international projects)<br />
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/education_culture/index_it.html<br />
(Commission’s Directorate-general for Education and Culture)<br />
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/education_culture/valorisation/index_en.html<br />
http://ec.europa.eu/employment_social/equal/about/key-doc_en.cfm<br />
(methodological guides)<br />
http://ec.europa.eu/ploteus<br />
(PLOTEUS - Portal on Learning Opportunities throughout the <strong>Europe</strong>an Space)<br />
http://partbase.programkontoret.se<br />
(easy-to-use database to find partners in other <strong>Europe</strong>an countries to assist in the implementation of GRUNDTVIG)<br />
www.bond.org.uk<br />
(network of more than 280 UK-based voluntary organisations working in international development and education development)<br />
6 In case you <strong>are</strong> short of recipes, you might find some inspiration from “<strong>Europe</strong>an Cooks at Work”, a cook-book, developed<br />
by another EU project, for international cooking in canteens; the recipes <strong>are</strong> from Austria, Denmark, Spain, France, Romania,<br />
the Netherlands, Malta and the UK; they <strong>are</strong> easy to prep<strong>are</strong> and tasty! (please see the downloads section at<br />
www.europe-at-work.eu)<br />
114
Module 6 – The Art of Successful Project Proposal Writing I: the Technical Part<br />
www.enter-network.eu<br />
(<strong>Europe</strong>an Network for Transfer and Exploitation of EU Project Results – E.N.T.E.R.)<br />
www.europe-at-work.eu<br />
(EU project website dealing with workers within companies and the EU)<br />
www.eurodesk.org/edesk/EUToolbox.dogo=7<br />
(list of <strong>Europe</strong>an partner search databases)<br />
www.evaluate-europe.net<br />
www.languages.dk<br />
www.leonardo.org.uk/partnersearch<br />
(UK National Agency's Partner Search Database (PSD) for the LLP)<br />
www.mdf.nl/en/training<br />
(management training and consultancy bureau in the Netherlands)<br />
www.pcm-group.com/pcm<br />
(training and consultancy company in Belgium)<br />
www.peermentor.bdf.es/Not_catalogo.aspidioma=1&home=2<br />
www.spokenspaces.eu<br />
115
Michael Schwaiger (AUXILIUM/AT)<br />
Module 7: How to implement a Project Successfully<br />
Unit 7.1.<br />
Unit in a nutshell<br />
Achievements<br />
Considerations before starting with the project work<br />
Main considerations in the initial phase of a project<br />
Understanding contractual structures and their impact on project management<br />
styles<br />
Definition of stakeholders involved in an EU funded project<br />
Unwritten laws and rules in EU project management<br />
Check-list of requirements when starting an EU project<br />
After this unit you will be able to:<br />
devise an appropriate management style according to your contractual<br />
position<br />
adjust your project management style to satisfy the expectations of all<br />
stakeholders involved in your project<br />
identify and agree on a set of quality standards relevant to successful<br />
project management<br />
ensure that the most important preconditions and quality standards <strong>are</strong><br />
fulfilled from the initial project phase.<br />
The first 90% of the project takes 90% of the time. The last 10% takes the other 90%. (Unknown)<br />
Warming up:<br />
A never-ending discussion in international project management<br />
is about the general management style: Should a<br />
project be led by one partner (the promoter or coordinator)being<br />
more or less self-contained or should a project<br />
be managed by the whole partnership, mainly based on<br />
democratic decision making<br />
What <strong>are</strong> the advantages and disadvantages of each style<br />
Which key factors could influence the decision on choosing<br />
the style What do you think would be best How would<br />
you like to manage a project<br />
Listen / Read / Discuss / Exercise<br />
7.1.1. Project management styles and target group orientated arrangements<br />
The questions asked above look rather simply to answer - but this is not the case. Project management<br />
is a very complex issue, proceeding at many different levels at the same time, changing its<br />
character and focus depending on the point of view of the person observing the project, and being<br />
pocketed by many different stakeholders, representing different interests and demands. Last but<br />
not least, project management is very much culturally and socially determined! The Finnish writer<br />
Hannu Raittila composed a very nice novel called Canal Grande, in which a group of Finnish engineers<br />
travel to Venice to support Italian colleagues in building water-barriers to prevent Venice<br />
from becoming permanently flooded. The two totally different ways of approaching this task in applied<br />
project management causes an intensive culture clash, which is not only the basis for a very<br />
amusing story but it is also a very profound observation of misunderstandings, interferences and<br />
116
Module 7 – How to Implement a Project Successfully<br />
confusion caused by different perspectives, approaches, focus points and methods of resolutions<br />
determined by cultural and social backgrounds.<br />
However, this does not only happen in fictional stories but also happens in daily life. As a short exercise<br />
please imagine the following situation: you <strong>are</strong> the manager of a top-class hotel with 20 bedrooms<br />
in your hometown and a group of guests has booked the whole hotel for a weekend. For Saturday<br />
your guests have asked you to organise an “entertaining afternoon” in town including a “surprise<br />
dinner”. None of your guests have ever been to your town; however money seems not to be<br />
much of a problem. Their only precondition is that they want to be actively involved in the preparation<br />
work as well as in the implementation of the afternoon’s activities.<br />
Please design a programme starting at 13.00 pm for your guests by using the following format:<br />
Time Activities How to involve guests Dos and don’ts<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
Before you start, select one of the “groups of guests” listed below and create as tailor-made a programme<br />
as possible:<br />
• School pupils (aged 8-10) who won this trip as the 1 st prize in the national reading competition<br />
sponsored by your National Ministry of Education.<br />
• A group of Jewish emigrants who left your town some 60 years ago and this visit is the first<br />
time they have ever returned since then.<br />
• A group of German youngsters who must undergo an anti-drinking programme.<br />
• A group of Spanish nuns from the Order of the Holy Trinity.<br />
• A transnational project group of senior learners from 10 different EU countries working on<br />
Active <strong>Europe</strong>an Citizenship.<br />
Did you get the feeling that the profile, image and related stereotypes of each target group determined<br />
the planning of the programme<br />
When implementing this exercise in other EU countries would this lead to different results (apart<br />
from the different sightseeing attractions in each town) What can you deduct from this exercise in<br />
relation to your project management plans<br />
117
7.1.2. Stakeholders of an EU project<br />
Listen / Read / Discuss / Exercise<br />
One of the secrets of successful project management is the art of satisfying as many stakeholders as<br />
possible to the highest possible degree. The difficulty is in identifying all relevant stakeholders involved<br />
during the project’s lifetime, in identifying their interests and demands in relation to each<br />
others and finding a way of satisfying them properly.<br />
Some of the stakeholders <strong>are</strong> easier to be identified, others <strong>are</strong> more difficult. Also their interests<br />
and demands <strong>are</strong> not always easy to distinguish. As an exercise, please think about the <strong>AESAEC</strong> project,<br />
during which this training course was developed. Who do you think its stakeholders <strong>are</strong> What<br />
<strong>are</strong> their interests and how could they be satisfied<br />
Stakeholders of EU projects, using the example of the <strong>AESAEC</strong> project:<br />
___________<br />
___________<br />
___________<br />
___________<br />
___________<br />
___________<br />
___________<br />
Should you already have your own project or project idea, explain who the stakeholders of your<br />
project <strong>are</strong> and how their interests and demands can be satisfied<br />
Listen / Read / Discuss<br />
7.1.3. Contractual relations and their possible impact on the project management<br />
Some of the main stakeholders in EU projects <strong>are</strong> even connected to each other by contractual relations.<br />
Usually, this includes the funding body (<strong>Europe</strong>an Commission, EACEA, National Agencies<br />
etc.), the promoter or beneficiary (lead partner) and the project partner(s). At least the relationship<br />
between the funding body and the promoter is always regulated by standardised contracts issued<br />
by the EC and there is little to discuss about them. Also the partner(s) and promoter can be<br />
linked to each other by more or less standardised written agreements. In general, there <strong>are</strong> three<br />
118
Module 7 – How to Implement a Project Successfully<br />
different kinds of contractual relationships that these parties can have with each other and the one<br />
opted for may also influence the style of the project management 7 :<br />
1. The Sandwich Structure<br />
Promoter, P 1<br />
P 2 P 3 … P n<br />
The EC stands in a contractual relationship only<br />
with the project’s promoter (Partner 1) and only<br />
between these two parties <strong>are</strong> all responsibilities,<br />
rights and duties concerning the overall<br />
project implementation settled.<br />
The same contractual relationship exists between<br />
the promoter and all other project partners<br />
(P2, P3 …), containing each partner’s rights<br />
and duties in the project. Important is that there<br />
is no contractual relationship between the EC<br />
and the individual project partners.<br />
Examples: multilateral and network project in<br />
the Lifelong Learning Programme.<br />
2. The Primus inter p<strong>are</strong>s Structure<br />
Promoter, P 1 P 2 P 3 … P n<br />
The EC stands in a direct contractual relationship<br />
with all organisations involved in the<br />
project (promoter and partners), and each organisation’s<br />
tasks, rights and duties <strong>are</strong> directly<br />
settled with the EC (mostly represented by different<br />
national agencies). In this structure, the<br />
promoter may, in most cases, also lead the<br />
project but it is not linked with the partners by<br />
a contractual agreement.<br />
Examples: Grundtvig and Leonardo Learning<br />
Partnerships<br />
3. The One for <strong>All</strong> Structure<br />
Promoter, P 1<br />
P 2 P 3 … P n<br />
Here the EC stands again in a contractual relationship<br />
with only the project’s promoter but<br />
the promoter is not necessarily related with the<br />
project partners by a contract. The promoter is<br />
only responsible to the EC for ensuring that the<br />
project is implemented successfully and according<br />
to the programme’s regulations. How<br />
partners contribute to the project, how the<br />
budget is sh<strong>are</strong>d in detail or what happens<br />
when troubles occur between the project group<br />
partners etc. is officially not put into writing<br />
(but could be a matter for individual negotiations<br />
and arrangements).<br />
Examples: Leonardo Mobility Projects, Town<br />
Twinning<br />
7 There is no official terminology for the structures introduced above; all names used here <strong>are</strong> creations by the author and<br />
<strong>are</strong> therefore not commonly known.<br />
119
Exercise<br />
How do you think these structures can influence project management approaches, particularly from<br />
the promoter’s point of view How do rights, duties, responsibilities, risks etc. change Can these<br />
structures influence the management styles Why<br />
The following table may be useful to help discuss this difficult issue:<br />
Level of …<br />
… responsibility the promoter has<br />
towards the EC<br />
… responsibility the promoter has<br />
towards the partners<br />
… pressure the EU can put directly on<br />
the promoter<br />
… pressure the EU can put directly on<br />
the partners<br />
… pressure the promoter can put<br />
directly on the partners<br />
… opportunities for partners to protect<br />
their own interests towards the<br />
promoter<br />
Sandwich<br />
low<br />
high<br />
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 – 6 – 7<br />
low<br />
high<br />
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 – 6 – 7<br />
low<br />
high<br />
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 – 6 – 7<br />
low<br />
high<br />
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 – 6 – 7<br />
low<br />
high<br />
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 – 6 – 7<br />
low<br />
high<br />
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 – 6 – 7<br />
Primus inter<br />
p<strong>are</strong>s<br />
low<br />
high<br />
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 – 6 - 7<br />
low<br />
high<br />
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 – 6 - 7<br />
low<br />
high<br />
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 – 6 - 7<br />
low<br />
high<br />
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 – 6 - 7<br />
low<br />
high<br />
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 – 6 - 7<br />
low<br />
high<br />
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 – 6 - 7<br />
One for all<br />
low<br />
high<br />
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 – 6 - 7<br />
low<br />
high<br />
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 – 6 - 7<br />
low<br />
high<br />
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 – 6 - 7<br />
low<br />
high<br />
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 – 6 - 7<br />
low<br />
high<br />
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 – 6 - 7<br />
low<br />
high<br />
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 – 6 - 7<br />
7.1.4. Hints and preconditions before starting a project<br />
Listen / Read / Discuss<br />
Although some main project management frameworks (legal responsibilities, financial procedures,<br />
administration and documentation of expenses etc.) <strong>are</strong> settled by written contracts, their influence<br />
on a successful project implementation must not be overestimated.<br />
Quite often, unwritten laws and regulations <strong>are</strong> the real determiners of successful communication,<br />
information flow, development work, social interaction and good partnership. Many of them <strong>are</strong><br />
based on so called soft skills, social and intercultural aw<strong>are</strong>ness and intelligence, experience or<br />
personal dispositions, which <strong>are</strong> difficult to acquire intentionally. However we would like to take<br />
this opportunity to give you some general hints and to raise some basic considerations before you<br />
start your project work.<br />
Make sure you know all the relevant legal frameworks and regulations (contractual settings,<br />
budget, financial procedures, reporting etc.) of the programme that is funding the project –<br />
the EC as well as your partners will expect and appreciate your knowledge of these issues!<br />
Make early contact with your personal project officer (who is responsible for your project<br />
from the funder’s side) in order to introduce yourself and to discuss relevant issues about your project.<br />
Do not be afraid, as usually these persons <strong>are</strong> very kind and helpful and their main interest is<br />
to ensure a successful and uncomplicated project implementation. Since you <strong>are</strong> both pulling on the<br />
same end of the rope you should work as a team.<br />
Establish an efficient and reliable technical communication structure within your partnership<br />
(by email, telephone, skype, project group meetings etc.). <strong>All</strong> partners should have access to<br />
these instruments and should be able to use them! Please consider also the strengths and weaknesses<br />
of each of these instruments – and try to control them proactively (e.g. emails <strong>are</strong> great to<br />
120
Module 7 – How to Implement a Project Successfully<br />
spread information quickly to many people at the same time but in order to solve problems or misunderstanding<br />
a personal phone call might be the better choice).<br />
Of course, the social side of your communication system is also of great importance and<br />
therefore partners should treat each other with respect and trust – this applies, above all, to the<br />
promoter! Although it is neither possible nor reasonable to base all activities within a project on<br />
democratic decision making processes, extensive cooperation and agreement within a partnership is<br />
indispensable. In case one prefers patronising behaviour, speaking with a commanding tone and<br />
showing little willingness for teamwork, then it would be better not to start an EU project in the<br />
first place!<br />
Do respect cultural, national, social, ethical, religious, historical and individual demands<br />
and diversity and be sensitive towards hot topics in this context. Nowadays, these management<br />
traps seem to decrease because of a generally more open and interculturally aw<strong>are</strong> <strong>Europe</strong>an society.<br />
Nevertheless, think twice before pampering vegans with tons of meat for dinner, before explaining<br />
to guests from Bilbao or Belfast how best to deal with separatist movements and before<br />
asking people from Scandinavia if it really makes sense to elect so many women into parliament.<br />
Do also make sure that all partners – at least the main contact persons – speak the agreed<br />
project language (often English, but it could be any other language you choose) to an appropriate<br />
level! Be aw<strong>are</strong> that it is extremely difficult to manage a project if this precondition is not met (and<br />
it can also be very expensive!)!<br />
Be aw<strong>are</strong> that the content part of your project (product development, organisation of<br />
mobility activities etc.) is only one side of your project. Dissemination and evaluation activities<br />
must be considered too. There is no other way than to handle them simultaneously – be prep<strong>are</strong>d<br />
for this!<br />
Without doubt the project manager is one of the key players within a project group.<br />
Therefore such a position should be occupied by a c<strong>are</strong>fully selected person, who possesses appropriate<br />
project management skills, intercultural and social intelligence, methodological knowledge,<br />
IT skills, flexibility and mobility, basic understanding of budgeting and administration, a general<br />
idea about the project’s content, appropriate (foreign) language skills, the ability to write good<br />
reports etc. If it is not possible to find one single person with this profile, tasks and responsibilities<br />
can also be split between two or more persons in leading roles.<br />
During the project hundreds if not thousands of pages, documents, pieces of information,<br />
invoices, pictures etc. may pile up on your desk. It is critically important to keep a structured overview<br />
of all these materials, as they keep the project going and they <strong>are</strong> the basis of all reports to<br />
the EC. Therefore, make sure from the beginning that you use an efficient and easy to use documentation<br />
and filing system covering electronic as well as hard copy documents.<br />
Open up your project to the public from the beginning! Try to set up a network of national<br />
and / or transnational experts and stakeholders who <strong>are</strong> interested in your project and who might<br />
be able to support you in the one or another way (such as sourcing additional money, accessing information,<br />
target groups, know-how, other networks etc.). Involve them in your project activities as<br />
much as possible – you will see that it will be for the benefit of all!<br />
121
Exercise<br />
Ready – GO!<br />
Checklist for the project start!<br />
Not fulflled<br />
In progress<br />
Fulfilled<br />
<strong>All</strong> relevant programme regulations and rules <strong>are</strong> known.<br />
<strong>All</strong> partners <strong>are</strong> informed about the approval of the application; they have confirmed<br />
being a partner in this project and have nominated a contact person.<br />
An appropriate project language was agreed and no major language barriers <strong>are</strong> expected.<br />
You have made contact with your project officer and you <strong>are</strong> willing to cooperate<br />
with him/her properly throughout the project’s lifetime.<br />
The contractual procedure between the promoter and the EC has been successfully<br />
finalised or is in the process of being completed.<br />
The contractual procedure between the promoter and the partner(s) has been successfully<br />
finalised or is in the process of being completed.<br />
The project is managed by a person who has the appropriate abilities, skills and<br />
know-how to carry out this task successfully.<br />
An efficient and reliable communication structure is already set up and partners <strong>are</strong><br />
able to contact each other.<br />
The partnership is aw<strong>are</strong> of the content of the project (objectives, aims, target<br />
groups etc.).<br />
The partnership is aw<strong>are</strong> of the management set up of the project (workplan,<br />
budget, reporting and documentation etc.).<br />
The partnership is aw<strong>are</strong> of the project’s dissemination and evaluation strategy.<br />
There <strong>are</strong> no indications that the initial tasks of the project cannot be implemented<br />
as expected.<br />
An effective and easily operated filing system is set up (electronically and for documents<br />
in hard copy).<br />
There is a basic willingness to open the project up to as many interested people,<br />
organisations, bodies, stakeholders etc. as possible.<br />
There is a potential post-project-life-time scenario (sustainability) in existence.<br />
Most of the partners <strong>are</strong> still convinced that doing this project is a brilliant idea!<br />
Other:<br />
Other:<br />
Other:<br />
Other:<br />
Before starting with your project you should check the above aspects to be on the safe side! You<br />
can be quite confident if most of the lights <strong>are</strong> GREEN (great, if all of them - but at least more than<br />
the half!) and none of them <strong>are</strong> RED! In this case: Ready GO! - and have fun with your project!<br />
122
Module 7 – How to Implement a Project Successfully<br />
Unit 7.2.<br />
Unit in a nutshell<br />
Achievements<br />
Project meetings and international visits<br />
Understanding the spirit and main purposes of transnational project<br />
meetings<br />
Consideration of key elements and workflow when preparing and implementing<br />
a meeting<br />
Instruments and tools for meeting preparation and implementation<br />
After this unit you will be able to:<br />
successfully plan, design and implement a transnational project meeting<br />
or longer transnational visits<br />
decide which instruments and tools <strong>are</strong> needed for these purposes<br />
use transnational project meetings as a powerful strategic instrument of<br />
modern EU project management<br />
Coming together is a beginning - Keeping together is progress - Working together is success<br />
(Henry Ford)<br />
Warming up:<br />
Visit www.bpb.de/fsd/europapuzzle/puzzle_flash1.html, where you can put<br />
together the EU country by country. If you wish, hold a contest in small<br />
groups, to see who is the quickest and needs less attempts. Please also discuss<br />
with which countries you would like to do a project and why.<br />
7.2.1. The project meetings – hints and practical arrangements<br />
Listen / Read / Discuss<br />
One of the greatest challenges in EU project management is the burden of long distance relationships<br />
between partners. Knowing how difficult it sometimes is to cooperate with the person next<br />
door in your organisation, you can imagine what might happen if all of your partners sit hundreds of<br />
kilometres away from you. Of course, there <strong>are</strong> also times when you see the partners (mainly project<br />
meetings, bi-lateral visits), and it is extremely important to make as much use of these opportunities<br />
as possible for management issues. Therefore, they should be treated, prep<strong>are</strong>d and implemented<br />
with great accuracy and c<strong>are</strong>!<br />
Planning and implementing a project meeting or a bilateral visit is a project in itself, following the<br />
same regulations and workflow. Speaking philosophically, from some angles project management<br />
can be rather similar to doing a jigsaw: there <strong>are</strong> a number of individual pieces which make little<br />
sense at the beginning but finally – when put together correctly - you will have a completed picture.<br />
In our case the picture is a project meeting, and the pieces <strong>are</strong> the following key elements:<br />
Fixing the meeting date<br />
Dates for meetings and visits should be fixed as early as possible (half a year in advance is quite<br />
standard) and never changed once they <strong>are</strong> fixed! Note - finding an appropriate date might be more<br />
difficult than it sounds, when considering the schedules of all the partners, national holidays of all<br />
the countries involved, the timescale of the project etc.<br />
Choice of country / hosting organisation<br />
Usually, the first meeting takes place in the promoter’s country and partners will then take turns in<br />
organising the subsequent meetings. If you have more countries than meetings it might be delicate<br />
to decide where to meet and where not to. However you decide, making sure that the meeting venues<br />
make sense according to the project’s topic, that they reflect <strong>Europe</strong>’s cultural diversity and<br />
123
geographic dimension and that they do not overburden the hosting organisations with work. Since<br />
this issue needs to be fixed at the time of writing the application, discuss it openly and frankly with<br />
your partners in advance.<br />
Set clear objectives for the meeting<br />
You should know why the meeting is needed (apart from “the project plan says so”) and what its<br />
objectives and intended aims <strong>are</strong>. You should have a clear picture about what should be different<br />
after the meeting than beforehand - socially, financially, with regards to content and development<br />
etc.<br />
Participants and other persons involved<br />
Of course, the project partners <strong>are</strong> the most important participants at the project meeting, however<br />
to make a meeting into a successful meeting it may be useful or even necessary to involve<br />
others experts, stakeholders, the media etc. too.<br />
Duration of meeting<br />
The secret is to define relevant factors such as working time, time for rest or social activities,<br />
travelling time, available resources (money, hotel rooms, venues etc.) and to put them into an<br />
appropriate timeframe. Nowadays the average transnational project meetings last approximately<br />
1½ to 2 full working days (not including travelling time).<br />
Social activities<br />
Nevertheless, do not underestimate the power of social activities (meals taken as a group, visits to<br />
cultural or social events, city tours etc.), and, therefore, provide appropriate time for them. These<br />
activities <strong>are</strong> perfect team building catalysers, as they allow participants to relax a little, and, last<br />
but not least, they <strong>are</strong> great opportunities for learning more about the countries, cultures and citizens<br />
of <strong>Europe</strong>.<br />
Meeting venue<br />
Suitable locations and venues (hotels, seminar rooms, restaurants etc.) should be used for the<br />
meeting as it is important to create a pleasant and creative working atmosphere and to ensure the<br />
smooth accomplishment of all the activities. The challenge is to make the partners happy without<br />
exceeding the meeting’s budget. Nevertheless, do always consider the need for relevant technical<br />
and other equipment (PCs, internet access, copiers, projector, flip charts, moderation cases etc.).<br />
Language of communication<br />
In case not all participants have sufficient knowledge of the meeting’s language you will need to<br />
overcome this barrier by some means. For example, you could do the interpreting yourself, which is<br />
cheap and easy to organise but is also exhausting and may tie up resources needed for other tasks.<br />
It is more convenient to engage professional interpreters – as long as the high cost of this can be<br />
covered somehow.<br />
Special arrangements and needs<br />
It may be that some of your guests have particular needs or wishes that require additional preparation<br />
so that they feel comfortable at the meeting. This could include things such as a transfer service<br />
to / from the airport or train station, the provision of vegetarian / vegan food, requests to visit<br />
specific local events, organisation of a babysitter etc. To avoid surprises and disappointments you<br />
should ask the partners well in advance whether or not they require any special arrangements<br />
(please see form below).<br />
Fixing the responsibilities and communication flow<br />
By now you already know that organising a transnational project meeting means first of all a lot of<br />
preparation work before the guests have even arrived. Therefore, make sure that tasks and responsibilities<br />
<strong>are</strong> clearly distributed within the project group and that communication works well between<br />
all parties involved – particularly between the promoter and the hosting partner.<br />
Development and distribution of agenda<br />
It goes without saying that the agenda is a key element of any meeting. In accordance with the<br />
agenda participants will make their own travel arrangements, make preparations in line with the<br />
124
Module 7 – How to Implement a Project Successfully<br />
contents of the meeting, and it will set out the timeframe for all of the meeting’s activities. Since<br />
the agenda is so important a specific section below is dedicated to this issue.<br />
Distribution and collection of other relevant information and documents<br />
Do not forget to distribute all of the relevant documents, information and data for the meeting<br />
preparation in good time before the meeting. Just as important is the collection and analysis of all<br />
partner data and communication in connection with the meeting (number and name of participants,<br />
their specific needs etc.). It is recommended to use standardised forms for the meeting registration<br />
(see below).<br />
Chair at meetings<br />
Usually, one or at the most two persons lead the meeting. He / she should have appropriate (foreign)<br />
languages skills as well as a basic ability to moderate a meeting, i.e. how to present, collect,<br />
structure and evaluate information / data, how to keep a group working together in a relaxed atmosphere<br />
etc..<br />
Cultural diversity, dress code and the formal addressing of persons<br />
Cultural diversity is always a major issue in project management and this includes when planning a<br />
meeting. Although national and cultural stereotypes <strong>are</strong> proven by the one or another representative<br />
from time to time, one will be surprised how few interferences in EU project management <strong>are</strong><br />
culturally determined (indeed overall there <strong>are</strong> very few, and they mainly seem to have their roots<br />
in personal dispositions rather than due to the country a person is from).<br />
Nevertheless, one should thoroughly consider whether or not cultural diversity could interfere with<br />
arrangements for project meetings so that you can be well prep<strong>are</strong>d in advance, e.g. when fixing an<br />
“acceptable time for dinner” you might receive a timeframe ranging from 18.00 to 22.00, depending<br />
on whether you ask a Scandinavian or a Spaniard. In actual fact 19.30 to 20.30 <strong>are</strong> quite common<br />
times for such dinners!<br />
Also, appropriate clothing is always an interesting question when attending a project meeting. Basically,<br />
there <strong>are</strong> no formal rules and everyone can dress as he / she wishes and feels most comfortable.<br />
Therefore it is difficult to give any recommendations. Usually, meetings in the North of <strong>Europe</strong><br />
seem to be less formal than in the South, but you can never be quite sure about this. A stronger<br />
indicator might be the occasion of a meeting - a public conference may require different clothing<br />
than a sight-seeing tour.<br />
Another <strong>are</strong>a of thin ice is <strong>Europe</strong>’s conversation rules about when and how to use a polite form of<br />
addressing people properly. Due to the importance of English in EU project management, members<br />
of project groups usually address each other by their forenames and no titles or official names <strong>are</strong><br />
used, which really eases communication within a group. But do not take this for granted and agree<br />
on such informal behaviour as a project group.<br />
List of attendance<br />
In order to record who was present at the meeting, who was excused and who was absent without<br />
giving a valid reason, a list of attendees should be prep<strong>are</strong>d and signed by all participants for each<br />
working day (see below).<br />
Minutes<br />
Whilst the agenda is sets out the plan for a meeting, the minutes <strong>are</strong> the summarised record of the<br />
discussions, decisions and activities that take place during it, fulfilling two requirements. Firstly<br />
minutes disburden the meeting participants from needing to take their own minutes, and guaranteeing<br />
that all partners have the same outcomes and conclusions in writing as the basis for further activities.<br />
Secondly the minutes should be structured, focused on the essential and circulated to partners<br />
not too long after the meeting (for an example see below).<br />
Evaluation<br />
As with all other important parts of your project, meetings should also be subject to evaluation.<br />
Since you have the unique opportunity to speak to all partners face to face and to observe the project<br />
group during its work, interviews and observation may be an appropriate means of evaluation.<br />
125
However of course, the use of written questionnaires can also produce valuable results (for details<br />
see next chapter).<br />
7.2.2. Templates for successful project meeting implementation<br />
Exercise<br />
Below you will find the form which was used for the registration of the kick-off meeting in the AE-<br />
SAEC project, and on the following page you will find an example of an attendance list. Please have<br />
a close look at both documents to see whether or not they <strong>are</strong> appropriate for collecting all of the<br />
data and information that is needed Do you have additional suggestions concerning content and /<br />
or design Please feel free to develop your own formats!<br />
<strong>AESAEC</strong><br />
(141757-2008-LLP-AT-GRUNDTVIG-GMP)<br />
Registration form for 1 st transnational meeting in Austria<br />
9 th – 11 th November 2008<br />
Name of participating organisation:<br />
Name(s) of participant(s):<br />
Telephone number(s) of participant(s):<br />
E-mail address(es) of participant(s):<br />
Date and approx. time of arrival:<br />
(please note that we meet on Sun,<br />
9 th Nov at Graz airport between 4pm-<br />
6pm)<br />
Date of departure:<br />
(a shuttle bus will bring you back to<br />
the airport on Tue, 11 th Nov not later<br />
than 4 pm)<br />
If you have any special needs,<br />
wishes etc. please indicate:<br />
(e.g. dietary requirements, smoker<br />
room at hotel etc.)<br />
Means of travel:<br />
(please tick appropriate) aeroplane train car other:<br />
___________<br />
Please return this form to office@auxilium.co.at by<br />
19 th September 2008 at the latest (earlier would be welcomed!)<br />
THANK YOU VERY MUCH!<br />
126
Module 7 – How to Implement a Project Successfully<br />
Attendance List for Project Meeting<br />
Day 1<br />
Project:<br />
Meeting in:<br />
________________________________________________________________<br />
Dates (from-to)<br />
Participant’s Name Organisation Remarks (if any) Signature<br />
127
Exercise<br />
Please find below extremely shorted versions of the actual agenda and minutes from the <strong>AESAEC</strong>’s<br />
kick-off meeting. Have close look at them and discuss their elements and structure. Do they correspond<br />
to each other In your opinion how could they be improved<br />
<strong>AESAEC</strong> - Kick-off meeting<br />
10 th November 2008 / Graz / Kukmirn (AT)<br />
Hotel Nagler, A-7543 Kukmirn, Tel+Fax: +43-3328-32xxx; www.nagler.cc<br />
A G E N D A<br />
MON, 10 th November<br />
Time Activity Partner(s) involved<br />
09:00 Official opening of the project Auxilium / AT<br />
09:05 Getting known to each other - presentation and<br />
introduction of all partners (max. 5mins per<br />
organisation!!!)<br />
09:45 <strong>AESAEC</strong> in a nutshell – main aspects and expected<br />
outcomes<br />
11:00 Coffee break<br />
11:15 Workshops (in pairs) about partners’ interests<br />
and expectations on the project<br />
<strong>All</strong> partners<br />
Auxilium and all partners<br />
<strong>All</strong> partners<br />
12:00 Presentation of workshop results all partners<br />
13:00 Lunch<br />
14:00 Contractual, financial and administrative issues<br />
(contracts, payments, reporting etc.)<br />
15:00 Dissemination, valorisation and impact strategy<br />
(valorisation plan, potential and opportunities for<br />
partners)<br />
15:30 Evaluation and quality assurance strategy<br />
(evaluation plan, comments and suggestions of<br />
partners, communication strategy etc.)<br />
16:00 Next project steps and developments, and discussion<br />
of open questions<br />
(responsibilities, tasks, deadlines, next meeting<br />
etc.)<br />
Auxilium<br />
and all partners<br />
Auxilium<br />
and all partners<br />
Auxilium<br />
and all partners<br />
Auxilium<br />
and all partners<br />
17:00 Evaluation of project meeting <strong>All</strong> partners<br />
18:00 Official closing of the meeting <strong>All</strong> partners<br />
20:00 Dinner for all participants <strong>All</strong> partners<br />
128
Module 7 – How to Implement a Project Successfully<br />
Minutes<br />
<strong>AESAEC</strong> – Kick-off meeting<br />
10 th November 2008 / Graz / Kukmirn (AT)<br />
AT / Auxilium<br />
AT / VHS Graz<br />
DK / Fritid &<br />
Samfund<br />
ES / ASAEL<br />
Mr. Michael Schwaiger<br />
Mr. Georg Müllner<br />
Ms. Christina Pusswald<br />
Mr. Max Reisinger<br />
Mr. Steffen Hartje<br />
Mr. Carlos Franco<br />
Ms. Marta Munoz<br />
IT / Obbiettivo Formazione<br />
RO / SEC Soros<br />
SI / 3rd Age<br />
University<br />
Ms. Patrizia Giorio<br />
Ms. Arianna Neri<br />
Ms. Csilla Lázár<br />
Mr. Gusztav Balazs<br />
Ms. Dušana Findeisen<br />
Ms. Alenka Hebar<br />
Monday, 10 th November<br />
Official Opening & Partner Presentations<br />
Following the official opening of the project by Michael Schwaiger/Auxilium, all project partners presented their<br />
organisations<br />
<strong>AESAEC</strong> in a Nutshell<br />
Michael Schwaiger/Auxilium presented the main aspects of the <strong>AESAEC</strong> project :<br />
• Training concept: The training concept focuses on authentic location learning, multi sensorial learning and learning<br />
by doing<br />
• Training course: The core materials will be available in writing – a booklet will be produced<br />
• Pilot trainings: The pilot trainings will be conducted with courses of 5 learners aged 60+; according to the application,<br />
4 real life<br />
proposals will be submitted to the ECP; since we <strong>are</strong> 7 partners a submission of 7 proposals will be encouraged.<br />
• The 2 nd Transnational Meeting 2 will be held in Zaragoza/ES from 25-26 th May, 2009.<br />
• The project’s logo will be developed by SEC Soros, by 12 th December 2008.<br />
Workshops<br />
Three groups were built and suggested to focus on following issues in the <strong>AESAEC</strong> Training Course:<br />
The three groups presented the outcome of their workshops and suggested the following modules for the<br />
<strong>AESAEC</strong> Training Course:<br />
Group 1:<br />
• Mobility, Interaction between EU institutions and EU associations for Senior Citizens and Town twinning<br />
Group 2:<br />
• Common features / differences between Senior Citizens in the EU, Elderly people in the future<br />
Group 3:<br />
• Focused on ICT, project management and soft skills for Senior Citizens.<br />
Contractual, financial and administrative issues<br />
Georg Müllner/Auxilium discussed the aspects in regard to the contractual, financial and administrative part of<br />
<strong>AESAEC</strong>:<br />
• Financial reports must be signed and copies of invoices must be attached.<br />
• Invoices for subcontracting costs must contain project name and number, name of subcontractor, amount to be<br />
paid, service subcontracted, date and location of signature.<br />
• Budget amendments can be made later in the project, but not at the project start<br />
Quality Assurance and Evaluation Strategy<br />
Michael Schwaiger/Auxilium discussed evaluation activities and the project work flow.<br />
Dissemination, valorisation and impact strategy<br />
In respect to the project, the following activities and products were discussed:<br />
• ENTER (The <strong>AESAEC</strong> project has already been registered with the ENTER network.)<br />
• Email Address Pool:<br />
Please provide an email list of national and international expert organisations (min. 10 per partner)<br />
by 15 th January 2009<br />
• Newsletter<br />
The 1 st issue of the <strong>AESAEC</strong> Newsletter will be published in January 2009.<br />
• <strong>AESAEC</strong> flyers:<br />
The project partners agree to produce the <strong>AESAEC</strong> flyers no later than May 2009.<br />
Any other business<br />
• Evaluation of the Kick-Off Meeting and Project Phase 1 (questionnaire was given to partners during the meeting in<br />
hard copy,<br />
however it will be sent out on <strong>We</strong>dnesday in digital version. It needs to be returned to Auxilium by<br />
21 st November 2008.<br />
Official close of the meeting<br />
129
Unit 7.3.<br />
Unit in a nutshell<br />
Achievements<br />
Monitoring and evaluation<br />
Basic understanding of workflow circles in project management<br />
Identification of objects, methods, instruments and stakeholders of<br />
evaluation<br />
Reasons for and benefits derived from evaluation<br />
Introduction of evaluation instruments<br />
After this unit you will be able to:<br />
identify and select relevant objects for evaluation<br />
consider interests and needs of stakeholders and experts involved in<br />
evaluation processes<br />
design a draft evaluation plan<br />
use selected instruments of project management evaluation.<br />
There <strong>are</strong> no facts, only interpretations. (Friedrich Nitzsche)<br />
Warming up<br />
When speaking about monitoring and evaluation, one might think of complex<br />
experimental set-ups in scientific processes. However, our daily life is full of<br />
more or less intended, deliberate and professional evaluation processes. What<br />
kinds of evaluation processes can you identify in your daily life and how do<br />
you benefit from them<br />
7.3.1. Project circle and objectives of evaluation<br />
Listen / Read / Discuss / Exercise<br />
ACT<br />
CHECK<br />
PLAN<br />
DO<br />
On the left you see the PDCA circle introduced by William<br />
Edwards Deming, an American pioneer in quality management.<br />
It is one of the mostly used concepts to describe the<br />
periodical development circle in project management. Please<br />
find out yourself, by using additional sources, what the PDCA<br />
circle is about in detail and discuss whether or not you agree<br />
that development processes follow this structure.<br />
Following the assumption of the PDCA concept, project management needs to continuously undergo<br />
a wide range of evaluation processes, which help to improve the quality of its results and to guarantee<br />
a general successfully project implementation. Therefore, evaluation is an integral and compulsory<br />
element in most EU projects – and the EC r<strong>are</strong>ly approves an application or a project report<br />
without sufficient proof of an appropriate quality management system being implemented.<br />
To establish an appropriate evaluation concept it is important to realise that there <strong>are</strong> many objectives<br />
within a project that can be evaluated. The table below gives a rough overview (please note<br />
that most objects cannot be allocated selectively, e.g. a project meeting could be listed in all four<br />
classes).<br />
130
Module 7 – How to Implement a Project Successfully<br />
Objects of evaluation<br />
organisation process outcomes impact<br />
• planning and management<br />
• composition of partnership<br />
• commitment<br />
• ownership<br />
• co-ordination and management<br />
• crisis and conflict management<br />
• lessons learnt<br />
• others<br />
• workflow and time management<br />
• working methods<br />
• project meetings<br />
• communication and information<br />
flow<br />
• monitoring and evaluation<br />
• dissemination<br />
• lessons learnt<br />
• others<br />
• website<br />
• manual learning materials<br />
• conferences and public<br />
events<br />
• visits / mobility phases<br />
• network development<br />
• dissemination materials<br />
(flyers, posters etc.)<br />
• transfer of information and<br />
best practice exchange<br />
• official reports to EC<br />
• lessons learnt<br />
• national and transnational<br />
feedback on project and<br />
materials from relevant<br />
target groups / end-users<br />
• involvement and interest<br />
of relevant stakeholders<br />
and (political) decision<br />
makers<br />
• sustainable use of project<br />
outcomes after project<br />
ended<br />
• set-up of sustainable networks<br />
after project ended<br />
• follow-up projects or other<br />
forms of co-operation<br />
• others<br />
• Intellectual Property<br />
Rights<br />
• Commercialisation and<br />
post-project scenarios<br />
• others<br />
Just as complex as the objectives of evaluation is also the variety of multilayer evaluation methods<br />
and instruments. Ideally, in your evaluation concept, different methods and instruments should be<br />
used for evaluating your project concerning several objectives and levels (always satisfying specific<br />
needs and requirements.<br />
7.3.2. Means and stakeholders of evaluation<br />
Listen / Read / Discuss / Exercise<br />
Below you will find a short summary of some of the most important methods and instruments used<br />
in project evaluation. Do you know all of them Do you have experience with some of them and do<br />
you know anything about their strong and weak points. Which ones do you think <strong>are</strong> most appropriate<br />
to evaluate the above indicated objectives and why<br />
official<br />
reports<br />
questionn<br />
aires<br />
Experts<br />
analyses<br />
diary<br />
notes<br />
surveys<br />
pilot /<br />
focus<br />
groups<br />
inte<br />
desk<br />
research<br />
document<br />
s approval<br />
observati<br />
ons<br />
improvem<br />
ent<br />
analyses<br />
131
A wide range of various objectives for project evaluation do also require a wide range of different<br />
experts and stakeholders, involved and interested in the evaluation process. Can you think of other<br />
experts and stakeholders in the evaluation process What do they evaluate and what <strong>are</strong> their interests<br />
in the evaluation process<br />
experts / stakeholders<br />
Partnership<br />
What <strong>are</strong> they good at evaluating<br />
What should they evaluate<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
What do they expect from the evaluation<br />
What benefits do they receive<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
EC/EACEA<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
Target group<br />
/ end users<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
Stakeholders,<br />
political decision makers<br />
external supporters of EU<br />
project<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
External / internal evaluation<br />
experts<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
Others:______________<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
132
Module 7 – How to Implement a Project Successfully<br />
7.3.3. Useful instruments of evaluation<br />
Listen / Read / Discuss / Exercise<br />
The following instruments should give you an example of how evaluation instruments might work<br />
and how they can look like and function. Please feel free to copy or modify them and to use them<br />
for your own purposes.<br />
Evaluation of project phases: This document can help you to collect feedback from the partnership<br />
concerning whether or not everybody was happy with recent developments in the project; additionally,<br />
everybody can express his / her overall impressions, feelings and opinions concerning the project!<br />
PROJECT PHASE EVALUATION<br />
Project Phase from: __/__ to __/__<br />
Name of organisation:_______________________<br />
TOPIC<br />
Report/Comments<br />
•<br />
1.1. Please describe briefly the activities you have undertaken<br />
in this project so far (Concerning dissemination<br />
activities please see 1.3.)<br />
1.2. Are there, in your opinion, deviations in the course<br />
of these activities in relation to the proposal and /<br />
or to your expectations<br />
1.3. What dissemination activities have already been<br />
implemented from your side<br />
1.4. Do you think that there is a common feeling regarding<br />
the aims of the project and where it is leading<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
1.5. How do you appreciate the quantity and quality of<br />
communication between the meetings<br />
•<br />
1.6. How do you appreciate the quantity and quality of<br />
the products developed so far<br />
•<br />
1.7. How do you feel about transp<strong>are</strong>ncy in the project<br />
and its processes<br />
•<br />
1.8. Do you see any threats and risks to the project so<br />
far<br />
•<br />
1.9. Do you feel comfortable being part of the project<br />
group Do you have the feeling that you can contribute<br />
at all levels of the project and that you <strong>are</strong><br />
respected by all other project partners<br />
•<br />
1.10. If there is anything else you would like to comment<br />
on or which you need to know to continue with<br />
your project work please let us know!<br />
•<br />
133
Evaluation of project meetings: The evaluation of project meetings or mobility phases is a must in<br />
each transnational project. The following tool might help you.<br />
Project title:<br />
Objective of evaluation:<br />
Organisation:<br />
Project meeting<br />
Please give your opinion about the project meeting by following the scoring system below as well<br />
as by providing the evaluator with some written comments!<br />
☺☺ = very positive; ☺ = positive; = neither positive /nor negative ; ☹ = negative; ☹☹ = very negative;<br />
NA= not applicable<br />
Issues ☺☺ ☺ ☹ ☹☹ NA Comments:<br />
Q1) <strong>We</strong>re you satisfied with the preparation work for this meeting<br />
(E.g. quantity and quality of information flow before the meeting;<br />
communication management from promoter and / or hotel etc.)<br />
Q2) <strong>We</strong>re you satisfied with the seminar room<br />
(E.g. location, equipment, size, table structure etc.)<br />
Q3) <strong>We</strong>re you satisfied with the agenda for the meeting<br />
(E.g. time structure, involvement of partners, appropriateness of<br />
methods and issues etc.)<br />
Q4) <strong>We</strong>re you satisfied with all information and materials you<br />
received during the meeting concerning the content and<br />
structure of the project (E.g. work, dissemination and evaluation<br />
plans; aims and objectives of project etc.)<br />
Q5) <strong>We</strong>re you satisfied with all information you received during<br />
the meeting concerning the financial and administrative issues<br />
of the project<br />
(E.g. information about reporting system, contracts, payments, budgets<br />
etc.)<br />
Q6) <strong>We</strong>re you satisfied with all information you received concerning<br />
next project steps and <strong>are</strong> you aw<strong>are</strong> what kind of contributions<br />
will be expected from you<br />
Q7) <strong>We</strong>re you satisfied with the working atmosphere during the<br />
meeting (E.g. did everyone have an opportunity to contribute properly<br />
and equally to this project meeting Was everyone’s opinion heard<br />
and respected etc.)<br />
Q8) <strong>We</strong>re you satisfied with the way the meeting was managed<br />
(E.g. communication, moderation and social skills; time, crisis / conflict<br />
management etc.)<br />
Q9) <strong>We</strong>re you satisfied with the quantity and quality of the contributions<br />
made by other partners at this meeting<br />
Q10) <strong>We</strong>re you satisfied with the social activities and atmosphere<br />
of this meeting<br />
Q11) Do you think the meeting was generally successful Do you<br />
think the project group was able to achieve relevant results<br />
and to make some progress with its work<br />
Q12) After your impressions and experiences at the kick-off<br />
meeting and the starting phase, do you still think it was a<br />
great idea to join this project<br />
What do you expect to be positive:<br />
Q13) Looking ahead to the next steps of the project, do you feel<br />
the project will see positive or negative developments<br />
(E.g. What kind of threats, risks as well as chances, opportunities etc.<br />
do you see Is there anything to be done, changed, avoided etc. in order<br />
for you to feel happier with this project)<br />
What do you expect to be negative:<br />
Q14) If there is anything else you would like to add or if there is a<br />
relevant issue not mentioned in this questionnaire, please feel<br />
free to tell us using this space:<br />
Thank you very much for your effort!<br />
134
Module 7 – How to Implement a Project Successfully<br />
Workflow monitoring instrument: The following evaluation grid may help you to keep a better overview of the workflow in<br />
your project. At the end of the day this is the most critical task of a project manager! The instrument is easy to use. List on<br />
the left hand side (pink) of the template all the tasks and expected results in chronological order, and gauge, by ticking off<br />
or commenting on the right hand side (blue), whether or not they have been fulfilled in time and according to the frameworks<br />
set by the proposal or partnership agreements.<br />
Workflow Monitoring Instrument<br />
Expected tasks /<br />
results<br />
Short description<br />
(if appropriate)<br />
Deadline<br />
Partners involved<br />
Status<br />
(e.g. already started, in<br />
process, completed, cancelled;<br />
comments etc.)<br />
135
Unit 7.4.<br />
Unit in a nutshell<br />
Achievements<br />
Dissemination and valorisation<br />
Stakeholders, benefits and risks of dissemination and valorisation activities<br />
Suitable dissemination methods and activities<br />
Relevant elements of dissemination and valorisation concepts<br />
Evaluation of dissemination and valorisation methods and activities according<br />
to their customer orientations, cost-benefit ratio, sufficiency and<br />
feasibility<br />
After this unit you will be able to:<br />
identify relevant dissemination and valorisation methods and instruments<br />
consider interests and needs of project stakeholders in your dissemination<br />
and valorisation concept<br />
design a draft dissemination plan<br />
use an instrument to control the implementation of your dissemination<br />
plan<br />
If I was down to my last dollar, I'd spend it on public relations. (Bill Gates)<br />
Warming up:<br />
Have you ever experienced any kind of dissemination activities in connection<br />
with EU funds Please exchange your experiences within your group, and discuss<br />
whether or not it makes sense to finance such dissemination activities.<br />
7.4.1. Benefits and risks of dissemination activities<br />
Exercise<br />
Dissemination is a major issue in EU project management and each project group is usually obliged<br />
to provide the EC with a dissemination concept or at least prove the implementation of dissemination<br />
activities, appropriate in quantity and quality. Please try to work out the interests and benefits<br />
as well as the risks and threats that dissemination has for each party involved in an EU project:<br />
136
Module 7 – How to Implement a Project Successfully<br />
•<br />
Dissemination activities<br />
Interests and benefits<br />
Party<br />
•<br />
Dissemination activities<br />
Risks and threats<br />
Partnership<br />
•<br />
•<br />
EC / EACEA<br />
•<br />
Dissemination activities<br />
Interests and benefits<br />
Party<br />
•<br />
Dissemination activities<br />
Risks and threats<br />
Target group<br />
/ end users<br />
•<br />
Stakeholders, political decision<br />
makers,<br />
external supporters of EU<br />
project<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
media<br />
•<br />
•<br />
the general public<br />
•<br />
•<br />
Others:______________<br />
137
Dissemination planning and evaluation: The following grid may help you to consider as many dissemination<br />
methods and means as possible. Be creative and think hard about your own potential<br />
and opportunities (you may be surprised how large and manifold they <strong>are</strong>). Do also try to identify<br />
benefits and chances as well as risks and threats of each dissemination activity, and try to sh<strong>are</strong><br />
responsibilities and activities within the partnership. Finally, you should be able to select those<br />
activities which <strong>are</strong> most relevant and realistic to be implemented!<br />
Methods and means of dissemination<br />
What can and should we do Who can do<br />
what<br />
Emails, email groups<br />
Meetings /round Tables<br />
Press releases, articles<br />
TV / radio<br />
Project website<br />
Flyers<br />
Posters<br />
Printing of documents<br />
(manuals, survey etc.)<br />
DVD / CD ROM<br />
Pilots / testing<br />
Networking / lobbying<br />
Organisation of workshops, conferences, public events<br />
Presentation at workshops, conferences public events organised<br />
by others<br />
Dissemination platforms and networks<br />
Sustainable implementation and usage<br />
Professional public relation manager / expert<br />
Agreement on Intellectual Property Rights for commercialisation<br />
of project products<br />
Other: ____________<br />
Other: ____________<br />
138
Module 7 – How to Implement a Project Successfully<br />
Exercises<br />
Make up an EU project or take a real one (find one on the internet or take one you <strong>are</strong> considering<br />
to apply for) and design a rough dissemination concept by filling in the above table. Try to keep<br />
your considerations and assumptions as realistic as possible. When developing a dissemination concept<br />
you should always consider the dissemination requirements and standards of the particular EU<br />
fund you <strong>are</strong> applying to. Please look up the relevant documents, e.g. application form, call for<br />
proposals, guideline for applicants etc., and analyse what is demanded concerning this issue.<br />
Find an EU funded project in your country, if possible in your immediate <strong>are</strong>a. Take a look at its<br />
dissemination methods, instruments and efforts. Make contact with the organisation leading this<br />
project and try to arrange a meeting at which you can become better informed about the project.<br />
Do also ask the project manager about his / her experiences with dissemination and valorisation<br />
activities and whether or not he / she is able to give you some recommendations and hints about<br />
how to disseminate and valorise effectively.<br />
Hints for additional activities supporting the module implementation<br />
• Use opportunities to leave the classroom or to bring in persons from outside your learning<br />
group as often as possible, e.g. experienced project managers, visit dissemination activities<br />
of EU projects etc.<br />
• Do not forget to work and learn as creatively and actively as possible and use any relevant<br />
and reasonable types of media.<br />
References and other sources helpful for further information<br />
Adam, Tammy/Means, Jan/Spivey, Michael (2007): The Project Meeting Facilitator: Facilitation Skills to Make<br />
the Most of Project Meetings. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.<br />
Bienzle, Holger (Ed.) (2001): A Survival Kit for <strong>Europe</strong>an Project Management. Advice for Coordinators of Centralised Socrates<br />
Projects. 2nd edition: For projects of selection round 1-3-2001 and later. Wien. Büro für Europäische Bildungskooperation/SOKRATES.<br />
Browaeys, Marie-Joelle/Price, Roger (2008): Understanding Cross-Cultural Management. Harlow. Pearson Education Ltd.<br />
Dussap, Anne/ Merry, Peter (2000/2008): Project Management. T-Kit N°3. Strasbourg. Council of <strong>Europe</strong> Publishing.<br />
ECOTEC (2008): Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Dissemination and Exploitation Actions. A Final Report to DG Education and<br />
Culture of the <strong>Europe</strong>an Commission under the framework contract on evaluation and related services. ECOTEC. Birmingham.<br />
<strong>Europe</strong>an Platform for Dutch Education (2005): Grundtvig Learning Partnership Navigator. Your Guide to <strong>Europe</strong>an Cooperation<br />
in Adult Learning. The Hague/Alkmaar.<br />
Lientz, Bennet P./Rea, Kathryn P. (2003): International Project Management. London. Academic Press.<br />
Marr, Steve (2009): Effective Leadership of Meetings. (www.womentodaymagazine.com/c<strong>are</strong>er/goodmeeting)<br />
Murphy, Own J. (2005): International Project Management. London. Thomson Learning.<br />
Raittila, Hannu (2001): Canal Grande. <strong>We</strong>rner Söderström Osakeyhitö. Helsinki.<br />
Tilkin, Guy/Biesen, Alden (2007): Self-evaluation of your Project. How <strong>are</strong> we doing How do we know What do we do next<br />
Handout at Coordinators Meeting for Grundtvig1 projects organised by the EACEA in Brussels 2007.<br />
www.adam-europe.eu (Dissemination platform for Leonardo da Vinci projects)<br />
www.bpb.de/fsd/europapuzzle/puzzle_flash1.html<br />
www.deming.org/ (The W. Edwards Deming Institute)<br />
www.eacea.ec.europa.eu (Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency)<br />
www.ec.europa.eu/education/lifelong-learning-programme/doc1208_en.htm (List of all Executive Agencies for the Lifelong<br />
Learning Programme)<br />
www.ecotec.com (British NA for the LLP)<br />
www.enter-network.eu (<strong>Europe</strong>an Network for Transfer and Exploitation of EU Project Results)<br />
www.ezinearticles.com/Intercultural-Management&id=24218 (intercultural management articles)<br />
www.ipma.ch (International Project Management Association)<br />
www.pmi.org (Project Management Institute)<br />
www.skype.com (Open / free internet communication / telephone source)<br />
www.sokrates.at/download/survivalkit/inhalt (Survival kit for EU project management)<br />
www.yourchildlearns.com/mappuzzle/europe-puzzle.html (EU puzzle)<br />
139
140
<strong>AESAEC</strong> – Glossary<br />
<strong>AESAEC</strong> - Glossary<br />
Acronym<br />
Active ageing<br />
Active citizenship<br />
Active <strong>Europe</strong>an Citizenship<br />
Active <strong>Europe</strong>an Remembrance<br />
Adult education<br />
Applicant<br />
Associations<br />
Authenticity<br />
Beneficiary<br />
Bottom-up process<br />
Call for proposals<br />
Citizenship<br />
Acronyms and initialisms <strong>are</strong> abbreviations that <strong>are</strong> formed using the initial<br />
components in a phrase or name. These components may be individual<br />
letters (as in UNO) or parts of words (as in Benelux).<br />
The act and policy of retaining older workers in the labour market but also<br />
relates to independency, well-being, personal growth and the integration<br />
of older people into society.<br />
An idea already introduced in ancient Greece about how citizens in a state<br />
can participate actively in all kinds of community processes, such as at the<br />
political and / or social level. Quite often this participation is based on<br />
voluntary engagement for the good of the general public.<br />
Adaptation of the ancient idea by the <strong>Europe</strong>an Union to promote the<br />
interaction and participation of all <strong>Europe</strong>an citizens in constructing an<br />
ever closer <strong>Europe</strong>, united in and enriched through its cultural diversity,<br />
forging a <strong>Europe</strong>an identity based on recognised common values, history<br />
and culture.<br />
Special action of the <strong>Europe</strong> for Citizens programme focussing on the<br />
remembrance of the victims of Nazism and Stalinism in <strong>Europe</strong> in order to<br />
maintain the aw<strong>are</strong>ness of the full dimensions and tragic consequences of<br />
the Second World War.<br />
This denotes all forms of non-vocational adult learning, whether of a formal,<br />
non-formal or informal nature. An "adult" in the Grundtvig sense<br />
refers to persons over 25 years of age as well as young people below that<br />
age who <strong>are</strong> no longer receiving an initial education within the formal<br />
school or higher education system of the participating eligible countries.<br />
Person or organisation who / which applies for an EU-project or grant,<br />
usually on behalf of a project group. In case of approval of the application,<br />
the applicant becomes the beneficiary.<br />
Mental connection of ideas, thoughts, plans etc, by which one builds upon<br />
another.<br />
Refers to the truthfulness and credibility of origins, attributions,<br />
commitments, sincerity, devotion and intentions.<br />
Organisation, consortium or individual which / who directly receives an EU<br />
grant and which / who is the official contractual partner of the funding<br />
body. In an EU project group with two or more organisations this is usually<br />
the promoter or lead partner, which is also responsible for the application,<br />
the project implementation and the reporting of a project.<br />
In political and social life a bottom-up approach means that the needs,<br />
demands and wishes of the smallest unit (in this case the citizens) <strong>are</strong> the<br />
starting point for decisions and processes, and by an upward direction they<br />
influence the political or social life of a very large unit (such as a country<br />
or the EU); opposite to a top-down approach.<br />
A call for proposals represents the official start of an EU fund, usually released<br />
by the <strong>Europe</strong>an Commission or similar public bodies, requesting<br />
applications; a call includes detailed information concerning the objectives,<br />
aims, target groups, financial frameworks etc. of a fund and it also<br />
introduces the application documents to the general public.<br />
The state of being a citizen of a particular social, political or national<br />
community.<br />
141
Civil Society<br />
Coherence<br />
Cohesion<br />
Contractor<br />
Council of the <strong>Europe</strong>an Union<br />
Cross-fertilisation<br />
Cultural diversity<br />
Dissemination<br />
EACEA<br />
EC<br />
Eligibility<br />
Eligibility period<br />
Enlargement<br />
Euro<br />
<strong>Europe</strong>an added value<br />
<strong>Europe</strong> for Citizens programme<br />
<strong>Europe</strong>an Commission (EC)<br />
Civil society is composed of the totality of voluntary civic and social organisations<br />
and institutions that form the basis of a functioning society as opposed<br />
to the state-held power structures (regardless of that state's political<br />
system) and commercial institutions of the market. Civil society refers to<br />
the <strong>are</strong>na of uncoerced collective action around sh<strong>are</strong>d interests, purposes<br />
and values.<br />
In linguistic terms the logical organisation of textual content.<br />
In linguistic terms the grammatical structure of a language.<br />
beneficiary<br />
The Council of the <strong>Europe</strong>an Union (Council of Ministers or just the<br />
Council) is the principal decision-making institution of the EU. It is<br />
composed of twenty-seven national ministers (one per state).<br />
In project management this means the achievement of objectives and aims<br />
through different and complementary actions carried out by different types<br />
of organisations and / or stakeholders.<br />
Cultural diversity is the variety of human societies or cultures in a specific<br />
region or in the world as a whole. As well as the more obvious cultural<br />
differences that exist between people (such as language, dress and traditions),<br />
there <strong>are</strong> also significant variations in the way societies organise<br />
themselves, in their sh<strong>are</strong>d conception of morality and values, and in the<br />
ways they interact with their environment etc.<br />
Public relation work in connection with a project and its developments /<br />
results, with the general aim to inform and reach as many stakeholders,<br />
key <strong>are</strong>as, organisations or citizens as possible. (see also exploitation,<br />
impact, valorisation).<br />
The Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency is a public body<br />
responsible for the operative implementation of various EU funds, such as<br />
<strong>Europe</strong> for Citizens, the Lifelong Learning programme etc.<br />
<strong>Europe</strong>an Commission<br />
Conditions that must be met in order to participate in an EU programme,<br />
e.g. participating country, target group or sector of project, status of applicant<br />
organisation etc.<br />
This is the time period during which expenses can be incurred and paid for<br />
by a grant.<br />
Act of adopting new countries into the <strong>Europe</strong>an Community and EU.<br />
The Euro (€) is the official currency of 16 of the 27 member states of the<br />
EU. The states, known collectively as the Eurozone, <strong>are</strong> Austria, Belgium,<br />
Cyprus, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg,<br />
Malta, the Netherlands, Portugal, Slovakia, Slovenia and Spain.<br />
Means the results of the synergy which emerges from <strong>Europe</strong>an cooperation<br />
and which constitutes a distinctive <strong>Europe</strong>an dimension in addition to actions<br />
and policies at the member state level.<br />
EU Programme through which citizens have the opportunity to be<br />
involved in transnational exchanges and cooperation activities, contributing<br />
to developing a sense of belonging to common <strong>Europe</strong>an ideals and<br />
encouraging the process of <strong>Europe</strong>an integration.<br />
The <strong>Europe</strong>an Commission (formally the Commission of the <strong>Europe</strong>an<br />
Communities) is the executive branch of the EU. The body is responsible<br />
for proposing legislation, implementing decisions, upholding the Union's<br />
treaties and the general day-to-day running of the Union.<br />
142
<strong>AESAEC</strong> – Glossary<br />
<strong>Europe</strong>an Economic Community<br />
(EEC)<br />
<strong>Europe</strong>an Parliament (EP)<br />
<strong>Europe</strong>an Union (EU)<br />
EU Programme<br />
EU Project<br />
Evaluation<br />
Exploitation<br />
Feasibility<br />
Flexisecurity<br />
Formal education / learning<br />
Future Workshop<br />
GIVE - Grundtvig Initiative on<br />
Volunteering in <strong>Europe</strong> for<br />
Seniors<br />
Good practice<br />
Grant agreement<br />
International organisation existing from 1958 to 1993; precursor to the<br />
EU.<br />
The <strong>Europe</strong>an Parliament is the directly elected parliamentary institution<br />
of the EU. Together with the Council of the <strong>Europe</strong>an Union it forms<br />
the bicameral legislative branch of the EU's institutions and has been described<br />
as one of the most powerful legislatures in the world. The Parliament<br />
and the Council form the highest legislative body within the EU.<br />
The EU is an economic and political union of 27 member states (stand<br />
2009), located in <strong>Europe</strong>. Committed to regional integration, the EU was<br />
established by the Treaty of Maastricht on 1 November 1993 upon the<br />
foundations of the pre-existing <strong>Europe</strong>an Economic Community.<br />
EU fund specially dedicated to specific target <strong>are</strong>as, groups, activities etc.<br />
Currently there <strong>are</strong> more than 450 different EU programmes in existence.<br />
According to special regulations of eligibility and by following standardised<br />
processes, organisations as well as individuals can apply for financial<br />
support by submitting a proposal (EU project).<br />
Activity funded by an EU Programme, usually on the basis of a submitted<br />
proposal.<br />
Quality management by controlling, monitoring and an adjustment process<br />
focussing on the appropriate development of project at all levels, e.g.<br />
product development, co-operation of partners, time management, dissemination<br />
activities etc; continuously applied at a high level, evaluation is<br />
an essential precondition for any successful project implementation.<br />
Sustainable use of and deriving benefits from the results of an EU project,<br />
e.g. by implementing and using its products, changing policies and regulations<br />
etc; this is the main aim of every project. (see also dissemination,<br />
impact, valorisation).<br />
Addresses the issue whether or not the project objectives and aims can<br />
really be achieved.<br />
A social and economic model which is a combination of the easy “hire and<br />
fire” of workers and high social benefits – including paid education - for<br />
the unemployed.<br />
Education / learning which takes place in schools, universities or training<br />
institutions and leads to a diploma or certificate. (see also informal education/learning<br />
and non-formal education/learning).<br />
The future workshop is a future technique developed by Robert Jungk,<br />
Ruediger Lutz and Norbert R. Muellert in the 1970s. It enables a group of<br />
people to develop new ideas or solutions for social problems. A future<br />
workshop is particularly suitable for participants who have little experience<br />
with processes of creative decision- making.<br />
New initiative implemented from 2009 onwards by the <strong>Europe</strong>an Commission<br />
consisting of a scheme of grants to support senior volunteering projects<br />
between local organisations in at least two countries participating in<br />
the Lifelong Learning programme.<br />
The most efficient (requiring the least amount of effort) and effective<br />
(best results) way of accomplishing a task, based on repeatable procedures<br />
that have proven themselves over time for large numbers of people.<br />
Contractualisation of the grant award, setting out the terms and conditions<br />
and the financial rules that apply; the agreement is signed by the beneficiary<br />
of a project as well as by the funding body.<br />
143
Grundtvig<br />
Holocaust<br />
Hosting organisation<br />
Human Rights<br />
Impact<br />
Informal education / learning<br />
Innovation<br />
Intellectual Property Rights<br />
Interculturalism<br />
Leadership<br />
Legal representative<br />
Lifelong learning (LLL)<br />
Lifelong Learning<br />
Programme (LLP)<br />
Long distance relationship<br />
Sub-programme of the Lifelong Learning programme, focusing on all<br />
forms of general learning (in contrast to vocational, school or university<br />
learning).<br />
The Holocaust is the term generally used to describe the genocide of millions<br />
of Jews during World War Two, a programme of systematic statesponsored<br />
extermination by Nazi Germany, under Adolf Hitler, its allies and<br />
collaborators.<br />
Organisation receiving a volunteer, guest, visitor etc. during an exchange<br />
or mobility action / project; responsible for general preparation work,<br />
accommodation and work / placement related needs. (see also sending<br />
organisation).<br />
“Basic rights and freedoms to which all humans <strong>are</strong> entitled." Examples of<br />
rights and freedoms which have come to be commonly thought of as human<br />
rights include civil and political rights, such as the right to life and liberty,<br />
freedom of expression, and equality before the law; and economic, social<br />
and cultural rights, including the right to participate in culture, the right to<br />
food, the right to work, and the right to education. The Human Rights <strong>are</strong><br />
stated in the non-binding Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR)<br />
from 1948.<br />
The effect of the project on its wider environment and its contribution to<br />
the wider sector objectives summarised in the project’s overall aims, and<br />
on the achievement of the overarching policy objectives of the EC. (see<br />
also dissemination, exploitation, valorisation).<br />
Can be found everywhere, e.g. in families, in the workplace, in NGOs, in<br />
theatre groups, or can also refer to individual activities at home, like reading<br />
a book, surfing the internet etc. Although totally unstructured important<br />
skills and know-how can be acquired through informal learning. (see<br />
also formal education/learning and non-formal education/learning).<br />
New way of doing something. It may refer to incremental and emergent or<br />
radical and revolutionary changes in thinking, products, processes or<br />
organisation. In many EU programmes a certain level of innovation is a<br />
basic precondition for a proposal to be funded.<br />
Bundle of exclusive rights over creations of the mind, both artistic and<br />
commercial.<br />
Denotes the relationship between two or more cultures. The term indicates<br />
that there <strong>are</strong> differences between cultures but also that there <strong>are</strong> nevertheless<br />
opportunities for exchange between cultures.<br />
Used to describe the handling of a team, such as an international project<br />
group; although based on participation of all project partners, usually<br />
there is one team leader in each group, mainly the promoter or coordinator.<br />
Person legally authorised to enter into legal and financial commitments on<br />
behalf of the organisation to which he / she belongs.<br />
Lifelong, voluntary and self-motivated pursuit of knowledge and skills for<br />
either personal or professional reasons. As such, it not only enhances social<br />
inclusion, active citizenship and personal development, but also<br />
competitiveness and employability. LLL is a basic concept of the EU’s<br />
education policy and is therefore promoted by a specific Lifelong<br />
Learning Programme.<br />
EU Programme dedicated to all <strong>are</strong>as, forms, activities, organisations and<br />
individuals dealing with any kind of learning (see also formal learning,<br />
Grundtvig, informal learning, Lifelong learning, non-formal learning).<br />
Paraphrase for a transnational group cooperating in a project although<br />
144
<strong>AESAEC</strong> – Glossary<br />
mostly operating from their home counties.<br />
Lump sum<br />
Member States of the EU<br />
Milestone<br />
Mobility<br />
Monitoring<br />
Multiplier effect<br />
National Agency<br />
National Agency<br />
Network<br />
Networking<br />
Non-Governmental Organisations<br />
(NGOs)<br />
Non-formal education / learning<br />
Non-verbal<br />
communication (NVC)<br />
Participative Democracy<br />
Grant based on a pre-defined flat rate amount calculated on the basis of<br />
different indicators, e.g. number of persons involved or days spent in connection<br />
with an EU project.<br />
One of the 27 sovereign states that have acceded to the EU, currently<br />
composed of twenty republics, six kingdoms and one grand duchy.<br />
Within the framework of project management a milestone is the end of a<br />
stage that marks the completion of a work package or phase, typically<br />
marked by a high level event such as the completion of a deliverable item,<br />
the publication of a document, a transnational meeting or a public conference.<br />
Spending a period of time during an EU project in another Member<br />
State in order to undertake study, work experience, other learning or<br />
teaching activity, or related administrative activity.<br />
Successful guidance and steering of an EU project by continuous<br />
evaluation of all relevant levels and objects; to gain best possible results<br />
the monitoring should be carried out by experts not directly involved in the<br />
project implementation, i.e. external experts.<br />
Replication by other people or organisations of a project's approaches,<br />
methods and services, particularly where the potential exists for their<br />
onward transfer to a further group of people or organisations.<br />
Official bodies set up at the national level (in each of the eligible countries)<br />
responsible for the coordination and implementation of a variety of<br />
EU programmes on behalf of the EU and / or the EACEA.<br />
The National Agencies <strong>are</strong> official bodies located in each of the countries<br />
responsible for the management of certain parts of the EU's programmes in<br />
the fields of education, culture and audiovisual at the national level.<br />
Formal, semi-formal and informal connection of natural (individuals) or<br />
legal (organisations) persons that sh<strong>are</strong> values, interests, activities etc.<br />
Activities to build up and maintain networks and / or to cooperate with<br />
networks.<br />
Term that has become widely accepted as referring to a legally<br />
constituted, non-governmental organisation created by natural or legal<br />
persons with no participation or representation in its operation by any<br />
government. In many jurisdictions these types of organisations <strong>are</strong> defined<br />
as "civil society organisations" or <strong>are</strong> referred to by other names. The<br />
number of NGOs operating internationally is estimated to be around<br />
40,000.<br />
Includes optional, often semi-structured education / learning within study<br />
circles, projects or discussion groups advancing at their own pace, with no<br />
formal examination and recognition at the end. (see also formal education/learning<br />
and informal education/learning).<br />
Usually understood as the process of communication through sending and<br />
receiving wordless messages. NVC can be communicated through gesture<br />
and touch, by body language or posture, by facial expression and eye<br />
contact. (see also verbal communication).<br />
Sometimes also called "direct democracy”; a process emphasising the<br />
broad participation of constituents in the direction and operation of political<br />
systems. Representative democracy tends to limit citizen-participation<br />
to voting, leaving actual governance to politicians. Participatory democracy<br />
strives to create opportunities for all members of a political group to<br />
make meaningful contributions to decision-making and seeks to broaden<br />
the range of people who have access to such opportunities.<br />
145
Practitioners<br />
Project coordinator<br />
Project management<br />
Project outcomes<br />
Project partner<br />
Promoter<br />
Quality management<br />
Redundancy<br />
Relevance<br />
Individuals and / or organisations who / which benefit from an EU project<br />
by usage of its outcomes and results.<br />
Usually the co-ordinator and the beneficiary of a project is one and the<br />
same; in some programmes it is possible to have a beneficiary and a coordinator,<br />
which provides management and administrative support to the<br />
beneficiary.<br />
Handling of a process or an activity achieving a certain aim or result by<br />
following a described procedure (work plan); usually this process starts long<br />
before the funded period of an EU project with the writing of the application,<br />
recruitment of a project group and drawing up contracts, and also<br />
lasts beyond the funded period with reporting and finalising administrative<br />
issues. This process also includes several levels, such as product development,<br />
evaluation and dissemination.<br />
Results of an EU project which should show effects on the project group,<br />
stakeholders, target groups or the general public; such outcomes can<br />
include published products, aw<strong>are</strong>ness raising, training, conferences, created<br />
networks etc.<br />
Person or organisation who / which is member of a project group but is not<br />
the beneficiary.<br />
beneficiary<br />
evaluation<br />
In pedagogical terms it is the repetition of content or information in order<br />
to increase its sustainable transfer to learners / target groups.<br />
In EU project management terms, the appropriateness of objectives and<br />
aims to the real problems, needs and priorities of the target groups that<br />
the project is supposed to address and to the physical and policy environment<br />
within which it operates.<br />
Sending organisation<br />
Organisation sending a volunteer, guest, visitor etc. during an exchange or<br />
mobility action / project; responsible for selection of participants, preparation<br />
of the mobility and cooperation with the hosting organisation.<br />
Skype<br />
Social cohesion<br />
Stakeholder<br />
Synonym<br />
Syntax<br />
Teamwork<br />
Text<br />
Free internet communication / telephone source (www.skype.com)<br />
Social cohesion is a term used in social policy, sociology and political<br />
science to describe the bonds or "glue" that bring people together in<br />
society, particularly in the context of cultural diversity.<br />
In this setting, and in a very broad sense, a person or organisation with a<br />
legitimate and / or obvious interest in a given situation, action or EU<br />
project etc, e.g. political decision makers, target groups, end users,<br />
funders, media etc.<br />
Different words (or sometimes phrases) with identical or very similar<br />
meanings.<br />
In linguistics this term is used to refer directly to the rules and principles<br />
that govern the sentence structure of any language.<br />
A joint action by two or more people, in which each person contributes<br />
with different skills and expresses his or her individual interests and<br />
opinions to support the unity and efficiency of the group in order to<br />
achieve common goals.<br />
Indicates a distinct cohesive expression in written language. Texts require<br />
to be presented through a script. Various cultures use different alphabets.<br />
146
<strong>AESAEC</strong> – Glossary<br />
Think tanks<br />
Valorisation<br />
Vegan<br />
Verbal communication<br />
Volunteering<br />
Usually an organisation or group that conducts research and engages in<br />
advocacy in <strong>are</strong>as such as social policy, political strategy, economy, science<br />
or technology issues etc. In this context it also refers to a group of people<br />
creating project ideas to improve the situation in the above mentioned<br />
<strong>are</strong>as.<br />
Originally a French term, the concept of valorisation is now widely accepted<br />
within the EU project management community as the process of<br />
dissemination and exploitation of projects outcomes with a view to<br />
optimising their value, enhancing their impact and integrating them into<br />
training systems and practices at the local / national level as well as at the<br />
<strong>Europe</strong>an level.<br />
Veganism is a diet and lifestyle that seeks to exclude the use of animals for<br />
food, clothing or any other purpose.<br />
Communication based on the usage of written or spoken words. (see also<br />
non-verbal communication).<br />
<strong>All</strong> forms of voluntary activity, whether formal or informal. It is undertaken<br />
of a person's own free-will, choice and motivation, and is without concern<br />
for financial gain. It benefits the individual volunteer, communities and<br />
society as a whole. It is also a vehicle for individuals and associations to<br />
address human, social or environmental needs and concerns, and is often<br />
carried out in support of a non-profit organisation or community-based<br />
initiative. Thus voluntary activities add value to society, but do not replace<br />
professional, paid employees.<br />
147
<strong>We</strong> <strong>All</strong> <strong>are</strong> <strong>Europe</strong><br />
The members of the <strong>AESAEC</strong> project group <strong>are</strong> responsible for the content:<br />
Austria, www.auxilium.co.at<br />
Denmark, www.fritid-samfund.dk<br />
Austria, www.vhsstmk.at<br />
DK<br />
Spain, www.asael.es<br />
AT<br />
SI<br />
RO<br />
Romania, www.sec.ro<br />
ES<br />
IT<br />
Spain<br />
Italy, www.formazionenet.eu<br />
Slovenia, www.univerza3.si<br />
www.aesaec.eu<br />
The <strong>AESAEC</strong> project (Project No 1417572008LLPATGRUNDTVIGGMP) has been funded with support<br />
from the <strong>Europe</strong>an Commission, represented by the Education and Culture DG.