The-Truth-About-Pet-Foods
The-Truth-About-Pet-Foods
The-Truth-About-Pet-Foods
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
your last letter where researchers gave massive doses of vitamin C to<br />
dogs and putatively had negative reactions, is an abuse of the scientific<br />
literature since in real life nobody would give such amounts to their animal.*<br />
Company D: As proof that different breeds have different requirements,<br />
it is proven that some breeds require only certain<br />
amounts of copper. Collies, for example, require 270 IU of<br />
vitamin D. Your foods do not show this certain and correct<br />
knowledge.<br />
<strong>Truth</strong> Response: IU’s of vitamin D or mgs of copper in collies and<br />
Bedlington terriers misses the point. Your statement, for example, “collies<br />
require 270 IU of Vitamin D per kilogram” (Are we sure its not<br />
270.015375948 IU’s) , demonstrates that your position is no different<br />
than the rest of the pet food industry which believes scientists can create<br />
100% perfect foods because they “know” how many IU’s of vitamin D a<br />
dog needs. You have fallen victim to the myth of the 100% manufactured<br />
diet and so will pet owners who follow your lead. Such fabricated diets<br />
based on specific requirements (only valid until the scientific board meets<br />
the next time) have caused immeasurable disease and suffering for companion<br />
animals. We have obvious logical differences in nutritional paradigms.<br />
All of the various “breed-specific” arguments are reducible to one<br />
thesis: You think you know exactly what each breed of dog requires in<br />
terms of IU’s, micrograms and milligrams. We think you don’t. On the<br />
face of it, your assertion is absurd since any thinking person knows that<br />
certainty such as you impute to yourself cannot be justified because – as<br />
explained in the previous letter – science is constantly evolving and not at<br />
an end point in any discipline. Since your foundation thesis is erroneous,<br />
all of the reductionistic specifics based upon it about which breed requires<br />
which exact dosage of certain nutrients are invalid.<br />
It is apparent from these few examples (volumes could be written)<br />
that truth does not prevail in the pet food marketplace. Marketing, propaganda,<br />
sensationalism, absurdity and myth displace common sense.<br />
* Cornell Vet, 1979; 69(4):384-401.<br />
PAGE 193