- Page 1: RESEARCH Evaluating the Impact of C
- Page 5 and 6: 1. Executive Summary 1.1. Introduct
- Page 7 and 8: The fourth phase of the project was
- Page 9 and 10: expertise within the school and dir
- Page 11 and 12: The interview phase found some enth
- Page 13 and 14: • Schools should be supported in
- Page 15 and 16: • The current arrangements for ev
- Page 17 and 18: 3. Methodology A mixed method appro
- Page 19 and 20: 3.1. Literature review The literatu
- Page 21 and 22: school size (pupil roll), and demog
- Page 23 and 24: 3.3.a. Interview Phase design proce
- Page 25 and 26: 4. Literature review 4.1. Introduct
- Page 27 and 28: improvement’ (DfEE, p3) and it of
- Page 29 and 30: Figure 2. Evaluating CPD at Three L
- Page 31 and 32: Day (1999) (see Figure 3) although
- Page 33 and 34: 4.2. Effective Continuing Professio
- Page 35 and 36: professional development activities
- Page 37 and 38: acquired. Evaluation of this level
- Page 39 and 40: data needs to be collected from a v
- Page 41 and 42: 5. 5. Questionnaire Findings 3 5.1.
- Page 43 and 44: sabbaticals/secondments. Job shadow
- Page 45 and 46: projects, school university partner
- Page 47 and 48: While ratings of CPD leaders and te
- Page 49 and 50: Table 8. Evaluation of different ou
- Page 51 and 52: Table 12. Methods used to evaluate
- Page 53 and 54:
CPD leaders also provided more info
- Page 55 and 56:
“questionnaires were collated and
- Page 57 and 58:
Finally, some respondents linked ev
- Page 59 and 60:
5.2.a.f Conclusions on evaluation m
- Page 61 and 62:
Table 19. Methods used to evaluate
- Page 63 and 64:
‘Following the course on KS3 stra
- Page 65 and 66:
2. Discussion Discussion among coll
- Page 67 and 68:
CPD experience to subsequent though
- Page 69 and 70:
Evaluation that was spread over tim
- Page 71 and 72:
‘All my responses to the first qu
- Page 73 and 74:
Table 21. Types of CPD do you provi
- Page 75 and 76:
Table 22. CPD Providers use of eval
- Page 77 and 78:
Table 24. CPD providers’ views on
- Page 79 and 80:
Table 26. CPD providers’ views on
- Page 81 and 82:
6. Interview Phase Findings The fin
- Page 83 and 84:
exemplifies the point that there wa
- Page 85 and 86:
“When I first got the role there
- Page 87 and 88:
“We have a number of young teache
- Page 89 and 90:
new teaching strategies or introduc
- Page 91 and 92:
“Children’s learning - that’s
- Page 93 and 94:
workers”. If you don’t offer pe
- Page 95 and 96:
To this end, a number of respondent
- Page 97 and 98:
value to the work of the school: bu
- Page 99 and 100:
Lack of time, however, was highligh
- Page 101 and 102:
in with their personal, class/depar
- Page 103 and 104:
of chipping away: “Yeah, but what
- Page 105 and 106:
Participant Reaction In the intervi
- Page 107 and 108:
It is interesting that most respond
- Page 109 and 110:
the children’s work reflect that
- Page 111 and 112:
One head teacher highlighted the va
- Page 113 and 114:
“When you get back to school, so
- Page 115 and 116:
7. Route Map Development 7.1. Route
- Page 117 and 118:
The Route Map is published here as
- Page 119 and 120:
Outcomes of Day Two: The outcomes o
- Page 121 and 122:
Use of the materials ranged from in
- Page 123 and 124:
7.3.e. Inner Circle Responses There
- Page 125 and 126:
The implication of this for schools
- Page 127 and 128:
is, through accredited courses, acc
- Page 129 and 130:
school outcome, so that evaluation
- Page 131 and 132:
School focussed questionnaires duri
- Page 133 and 134:
Appendix 2. Respondent and Non Resp
- Page 135 and 136:
Appendix 3. Comparison of responden
- Page 137 and 138:
Appendix 4. Interview Phase Schools
- Page 139 and 140:
Appendix 6. Interview Schedules EVA
- Page 141 and 142:
Needs Analysis and Effective CPD Pr
- Page 143 and 144:
Head of Department/ Team Leader Rol
- Page 145 and 146:
Teacher Provision and Role 1. How w
- Page 147 and 148:
CPD Provider Provision and Role 1.
- Page 149 and 150:
Appendix 7. Questionnaires CPD Lead
- Page 151 and 152:
Section 2: CPD evaluation in practi
- Page 153 and 154:
8c. When support from the school fo
- Page 155 and 156:
Always Usually Sometimes Rarely Nev
- Page 157 and 158:
21. Would you be interested in work
- Page 159 and 160:
Teacher Questionnaire EVALUATING TH
- Page 161 and 162:
2. When you have participated in CP
- Page 163 and 164:
……………………………
- Page 165 and 166:
2. Has the effectiveness of CPD act
- Page 167 and 168:
13. What is your role within the or
- Page 169 and 170:
Preface These materials are intende
- Page 171 and 172:
Capacity building in a school must
- Page 173 and 174:
Summative evaluation, on the other
- Page 175 and 176:
Figure 2: A Range of CPD Activities
- Page 177 and 178:
Participant reaction This is the mo
- Page 179 and 180:
anch”, or if the usual response t
- Page 181 and 182:
Assessment scores are one way of as
- Page 183 and 184:
Participant Reaction Immediate eval
- Page 185 and 186:
! Consider how current procedures m
- Page 187 and 188:
Moving on: Participant Learning Mos
- Page 189 and 190:
Organisational support and change I
- Page 191 and 192:
Most ticks in the “Enhancing” c
- Page 193 and 194:
Moving on: Participant Use of New K
- Page 195 and 196:
Pupil learning outcomes Scrutiny of
- Page 197 and 198:
Evaluation of the Impact of CPD Eva
- Page 199 and 200:
Most ticks in the “Enhancing” c
- Page 201 and 202:
superficially very much alike - in
- Page 203 and 204:
Appendix 10. Citations Benfield, C.
- Page 205 and 206:
Citations for Report Benfield, C. R
- Page 207 and 208:
Smith, C. L. (2002). "Using continu