21.02.2015 Views

Botkin Environmental Science Earth as Living Planet 8th txtbk

Botkin Environmental Science Earth as Living Planet 8th txtbk

Botkin Environmental Science Earth as Living Planet 8th txtbk

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

314 CHAPTER 15 Fossil Fuels and the Environment<br />

Many Al<strong>as</strong>kans want the drilling to proceed and<br />

point out that oil drilling for 30 years on the North<br />

Slope of Al<strong>as</strong>ka (Prudhoe Bay) h<strong>as</strong> not harmed animals<br />

or the environment.<br />

Arguments against Drilling in the ANWR<br />

Advances in technology are irrelevant to the question of<br />

whether or not the ANWR should be drilled. Some wilderness<br />

should remain wilderness! Drilling will forever<br />

change the pristine environment of the North Slope.<br />

Even with the best technology, oil exploration and<br />

development will impact the ANWR. Intensive activity,<br />

even in winter on roads constructed of ice, will<br />

probably disrupt wildlife.<br />

Ice roads are constructed from water from the tundra<br />

ponds. To build a road 1 km (0.63 mi) long requires<br />

about 3,640 m 3 (1 million gallons) of water.<br />

Heavy vehicles used in exploration permanently scar<br />

the ground—even if the ground is frozen hard when<br />

the vehicles travel across the open tundra.<br />

Accidents may occur in even the best facilities.<br />

Oil development is inherently damaging because it<br />

involves a m<strong>as</strong>sive industrial complex of people, vehicles,<br />

equipment, pipelines, and support facilities.<br />

Our decision about drilling in the Al<strong>as</strong>ka National Wildlife<br />

Refuge will reflect both science and values at a b<strong>as</strong>ic level.<br />

New technology will lessen the environmental impact of oil<br />

drilling. How we value the need for energy from oil compared<br />

with how we value preservation of a pristine wilderness area<br />

will determine our action: to drill or not to drill. The debate is<br />

not over yet. The oil crisis of 2008 that drove the price of g<strong>as</strong>oline<br />

to nearly $5 per gallon placed ANWR oil development in<br />

the spotlight again.<br />

Air pollution is perhaps the most familiar and serious<br />

environmental impact of burning oil. Combustion of g<strong>as</strong>oline<br />

in automobiles produces pollutants that contribute to urban<br />

smog. (The adverse effects of smog on vegetation and human<br />

health are well documented and are discussed in detail in<br />

Chapter 21.)<br />

15.3 Coal<br />

Partially decomposed vegetation, when buried in a sedimentary<br />

environment, may be slowly transformed into the<br />

solid, brittle, carbonaceous rock we call coal. This process<br />

is shown in Figure 15.10. Coal is by far the world’s most<br />

abundant fossil fuel, with a total recoverable resource of<br />

about 825 billion metric tons (Figure 15.11). The annual<br />

world consumption of coal is about 7 billion metric tons,<br />

sufficient for about 120 years at the current rate of use. 7<br />

There are about 18,500 coal mines in the United States<br />

with combined reserves of 262 billion tons and 2008<br />

production of 1.2 billion tons. At present rates of mining,<br />

U.S. reserves will l<strong>as</strong>t nearly 250 years. 7, 17 If, however,<br />

consumption of coal incre<strong>as</strong>es in the coming decades, the<br />

resource will not l<strong>as</strong>t nearly <strong>as</strong> long. 18<br />

Coal is cl<strong>as</strong>sified, depending on its energy and sulfur<br />

content, <strong>as</strong> anthracite, bituminous, subbituminous, or<br />

lignite (see Table 15.2). The energy content is greatest in<br />

anthracite coal and lowest in lignite coal. The distribution<br />

of coal in the contiguous United States is shown in Figure<br />

15.12.<br />

The sulfur content of coal is important because<br />

low-sulfur coal emits less sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ) and is<br />

therefore more desirable <strong>as</strong> a fuel for power plants. Most<br />

low-sulfur coal in the United States is the relatively lowgrade,<br />

low-energy lignite and subbituminous coal found<br />

west of the Mississippi River. Power plants on the E<strong>as</strong>t<br />

Peat<br />

Coal swamps form.<br />

Buried peat<br />

Rise in sea level buries swamps in sediment.<br />

Coal<br />

(thickness<br />

exaggerated)<br />

FIGURE 15.10 Processes by which buried plant debris (peat) is<br />

transformed into coal.<br />

Compression of peat forms coal.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!