Senate Food Safety Bill 11-24-09.pdf
Senate Food Safety Bill 11-24-09.pdf
Senate Food Safety Bill 11-24-09.pdf
Transform your PDFs into Flipbooks and boost your revenue!
Leverage SEO-optimized Flipbooks, powerful backlinks, and multimedia content to professionally showcase your products and significantly increase your reach.
SENATE FOOD SAFETY BILL SENT TO FLOOR<br />
By Connie Kirby and Calli Daly<br />
The Congressional debate regarding what steps are necessary to keep our food supply safe<br />
continues.<br />
On November 18 th, the U.S. <strong>Senate</strong> Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee<br />
(HELP) passed the <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> Modernization Act of 2009, S. 510. The U.S. House of<br />
Representatives passed a comparable bill, H.R. 2749, on July 30, 2009.<br />
With the commitment of Chairman Tom Harkin (D-IA) to continue to address several<br />
contentious issues before the bill is considered by the full senate, several amendments were<br />
offered and withdrawn by members of the committee. One of these amendments was sponsored<br />
by Senator Jeff Merkley (D-OR) and addressed country of origin labeling (COOL) for processed<br />
foods.<br />
In short, S. 510 will impact many of the day-to-day operations of processors by increasing<br />
FDA authority and efforts related to prevention, detection and mitigation, and import<br />
verification. NW delegation members Senators Patty Murray (D-WA) and Jeff Merkley both<br />
serve on the committee and support this bill. S. 510 has bi-partisan support and most of its<br />
provisions are supported by the food processing industry. The industry wants to work with the<br />
Chairman to improve the language related to traceability, finished product testing and fees.<br />
At press time, the bill had not yet been scheduled for debate by the full <strong>Senate</strong>. A summary of<br />
key provisions and amendments directly affecting NWFPA members follows (see callout). While<br />
final legislation will be a result of a conference, processors should expect some form of these<br />
provisions to take effect anywhere from 1 ½ to 3 years from the date of enactment.
Provisions of S. 510 Affecting NW <strong>Food</strong> Processors<br />
Title I Prevention<br />
Sec. 101 Inspection of Records allows the FDA access to and copies of all records relating to the manufacture,<br />
processing, packing, distribution, receipt, holding, or importation of a product that FDA reasonably believes are<br />
needed to assist the FDA in determining whether there is a reasonable probability that the use of or exposure to the<br />
food will cause serious adverse health consequences or death to humans or animals.<br />
Sec. 102 Registration provides for biennial registration renewal and suspension of registration preventing import or<br />
sale of food; hearing on suspension and corrective action plan.<br />
Sec.103 HACCP requires a registered facility to develop a written HACCP plan with documentation of hazard analysis<br />
of naturally occurring and accidental and intentional contaminants, preventative controls, performance monitoring,<br />
corrective actions, and verification; make available to FDA and revised when significant changes are made to the<br />
process or every 3 years; general standards due from FDA in 18 months.<br />
Sec.104 Performance standards Requires that, every 2 years, FDA will issue guidance documents, action levels or<br />
regulations pertaining to the most significant food contaminants of products or product classes known at the time.<br />
Sec.106 <strong>Food</strong> defense requires guidance documents after 1 year that include a model assessment and examples of<br />
mitigation strategies; regulations after 2 years that protect against intentional adulteration of short shelf‐life, bulk<br />
foods with a high risk of intentional contamination.<br />
Sec.107 Fees allows for fees for reinspection‐related costs, failure to comply with a recall order, or participation in a<br />
voluntary qualified importer program.<br />
Sec.<strong>11</strong>1 Sanitary transport of food requires the FDA to promulgate regulations requiring shippers, carriers by motor<br />
vehicle or rail vehicle, receivers, and other persons engaged in the transportation of food to use sanitary<br />
transportation practices.<br />
Title II Detect and Respond<br />
Sec. 201 Targeting inspection resources requires FDA to target inspection resources based on risk profile of the food,<br />
a facilities compliance history, the rigor of the facility’s HACCP plan, and any other appropriate criteria.<br />
Sec. 205 Trace back pilot project requires FDA to conduct a pilot project on a recently recalled product type to<br />
develop methods that are applicable to small business and that use technologies that enhance trace back and<br />
forward.<br />
Sec.207 Mandatory recall authority provides FDA with mandatory recall authority; requires establishment of an<br />
internet search engine of recalls in effect.<br />
Sec. 208 Administrative detention expands administrative detention authority for FDA to include adulterated or<br />
misbranded food and lowers the bar of evidence to take action.<br />
Title III Imported <strong>Food</strong><br />
Sec. 310 Foreign supplier verification program requires importers to perform verification activities than ensure that<br />
the food is in compliance with FDA regulations according to a FDA guidance plan.<br />
Sec. 302 Voluntary qualified importer program provides for expedited importation of foreign products that comply<br />
with a voluntary review program.<br />
Sec. 303 Import certification grants FDA authority to require certification for high risk foods seeking importation into<br />
the US.<br />
Sec. 308 Accreditation of third party auditors provides for accredited third party consultative and regulatory audits of<br />
foreign facilities for purposes of certification or eligibility for the voluntary qualified importer program.<br />
Title IV Miscellaneous provisions<br />
Sec. 401 Funding provides for statutory funding and field staffing increases through 2014.<br />
Sec. 402 Whistleblower protection provides whistleblower protection to an employee who reports, has or is about to<br />
testify about, or refuses to participate in an activity they reasonably believe to be a violation of the FFDCA.<br />
Amendments passed<br />
Fish guidance requires FDA to update the HACCP Guidance document for fish and fish products.<br />
Small producers of ag commodities requires consultation and outreach, including small businesses and entities that<br />
sell directly to consumers and farmer representatives.<br />
Amendments offered and withdrawn<br />
Trace back of processed foods requires establishment of standards for a tracing system in processed foods.<br />
Salmon COOL expands COOL to canned salmon.<br />
Restitution for erroneous recalls provides restitution to address damages from erroneous recalls.<br />
Protection of proprietary records provides for protection of facility records, trade secrets, and proprietary<br />
information.<br />
Duplicative oversight by USDA and FDA addresses issues for facilities raised because of duplicative regulatory<br />
jurisdiction.<br />
COOL for processed foods requires the FDA to promulgate labeling rules for processed food to identify the country in<br />
which the final processing occurred and that such labeling does not identify the country of origin of the ingredients.