Revelation 20 - In Depth Bible Commentaries
Revelation 20 - In Depth Bible Commentaries
Revelation 20 - In Depth Bible Commentaries
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
2369<br />
(...continued)<br />
earth. All these blessings will come upon you and accompany you if you obey YHWH your<br />
God...”<br />
Deuteronomy 28:15-68, “However, if you do not obey YHWH your God, and do not<br />
carefully follow all His commands and decrees I am giving you today, all these curses will<br />
come upon you and overtake you...”<br />
Deuteronomy 30:15, “See, I set before you today life and prosperity, death and<br />
destruction...” (See the entire chapter.)<br />
We agree with Newport in his comment that "When taken seriously, this final note evaporates<br />
all theories of universalism. God's mercy is vast beyond comprehension, but His mercy<br />
is not limitless. He will never reject any who come to Him for mercy, nor will He force Himself<br />
on any who choose to live without Him.” (P. 304)<br />
That is, the author of <strong>Revelation</strong> in this present passage offers no hope to those who<br />
choose to live as if God is dead.<br />
But this is not all that the <strong>Bible</strong> says concerning such people, and we are reminded of<br />
what British theologians have called “the greater hope,” based on such biblical passages as<br />
Ezekiel 16:53-63, which offers hope to Sodom and her daughters who have perished in fiery<br />
destruction, and to the terribly apostate prostitute Israel as well; and 1 Peter 3:18-<strong>20</strong>, which<br />
offers hope to those spirits in prison who were destroyed in Noah’s flood. What do you think?<br />
Can these biblical teachings be “held together in tension,” or must one be held to the exclusion<br />
of the other?<br />
Hough states, "The man of Patmos is firmly convinced that those who have suffered<br />
most must receive conspicuous reward. He is also convinced that there must be a triumph of<br />
Christ in this very world which has seen so many moral tragedies. So he pictures the thousand<br />
years of splendor when these faithful dead are recalled to sit on thrones with the regnant<br />
Christ. The very world which had spurned the saints is to be ruled by them. This sense of<br />
what may be called a victory of good in history has haunted the imagination of earnest men<br />
century after century...<br />
"It is the essential characteristic of the thousand years of the triumph of goodness and<br />
of the good in <strong>Revelation</strong> that every moral value is firmly maintained. Those who have been<br />
treated with miserable and bitter injustice on the field of history are brought back for triumph<br />
where they had experienced only defeat..." (P. 606)<br />
Is this the <strong>Bible</strong>’s final answer to Job’s agonizing questions concerning God’s justice?<br />
Is there finally no solution to Job’s dilemma apart from seeing history as a whole, as the<br />
visions of <strong>Revelation</strong> do, and that view brief human life-spans in the light of eternity, where<br />
God’s justice and His eternal purpose are victorious? What do you think?<br />
1047