25.03.2015 Views

revised final closure plan - Salinas Valley Solid Waste Authority

revised final closure plan - Salinas Valley Solid Waste Authority

revised final closure plan - Salinas Valley Solid Waste Authority

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Revised Final Closure Plan July 2010<br />

Crazy Horse Sanitary Landfill -21- 103-97133<br />

conditions in the upstream phases could potentially overwhelm the existing benches and overside<br />

drains on the south slope and the subsurface HDPE pipe currently in the main channel alignment<br />

flowing from the entrance area to the southeast discharge at the end of the Module 1 perimeter road.<br />

Storm Water Sedimentation Basins and Retention Capacity<br />

After stormwater run-off and run-on has been conveyed away from the closed landfill, it enters a<br />

system of proposed energy dispersion and existing retention structures. Stormwater flow from<br />

Sedimentation Basin A, Subbasin C, and Subbasin B will discharge to a rip-rap energy dispersion<br />

apron at the location shown on Figure 17. The peak discharge to this apron will be approximately<br />

162 cfs (Appendix E). The apron is sized with a riprap D 50 diameter of 12.5 inches. This classifies as<br />

a Light riprap (Caltrans) to be placed 2 feet deep over a 15-foot by 20-foot area. Flow exiting the riprap<br />

apron will enter an approximately 500-foot long natural drainage course as shown on Figure 17.<br />

This vegetated drainage will remove most sediment before flows enter Sedimentation Basin B. This<br />

drainage course discharges into the headwater pool of a culvert emptying into Sedimentation Basin B.<br />

Discharge from Sedimentation Basin B leaves the landfill property and flows into Pesante Creek. The<br />

peak discharge of Sedimentation Basin B was compared to estimates of pre-landfill discharge in<br />

accordance with Low Impact Development (LID) practices. A detention analysis of the two basins is<br />

detailed in Appendix E and summarized below.<br />

Sedimentation Basin A receives stormwater discharge from Subbasin A on the west side of the<br />

topdeck area. The southern low point of Sedimentation Basin A discharges into an existing 36-inch<br />

CSP which discharges to the rip-rap apron dicussed above. Ultimately discharge from Sedimentation<br />

Basin A contributes to peak flow into Sedimentation Basin B further downgradient (the lowest point<br />

of the site’s property). As discussed in Appendix E, Sedimentation Basin A has an adequately sized<br />

discharge structure (36” culvert) for the 100-year design storm. Hydraulic analysis of the culvert<br />

outlet flow capacity to the peak stormwater flow revealed no improvements to this basin should be<br />

required according to the analysis.<br />

To satisfy LID restrictions on peak discharge, Sedimentation Basin B will require some minor<br />

improvements to control peak discharge:<br />

1. Installation of a sluice gate on the existing outlet to restrict peak discharge.<br />

2. Raising the southern berm to provide required freeboard.<br />

3. Installation of a diversion channel to accommodate 100-year peak flow into the<br />

basin.<br />

The existing Sedimentation Basin B outlet structure consists of a concrete-lined trapezoidal weir<br />

approximately 8 feet wide and 2.5 feet deep with an inlet elevation of 312-ft MSL. The basin is<br />

surrounded by a mixture of tall vegetation and trees, thus protected from wind induced wave action.<br />

The sideslopes of the weir are approximately 2H:1V. Flow calculations indicate the weir can<br />

adequately manage peak discharge off of the proposed artificial turf <strong>final</strong> cover system from the 100-<br />

yr storm event. However, that peak flow would exceed the estimated peak flow from pre-landfill<br />

conditions. A flow restriction device is required to reduce peak discharge from the basin to that<br />

estimated for the pre-landfill condition. As discussed in Appendix E, a sluice gate installed to a<br />

height of 1.3 feet above the bottom of the existing 8-foot wide weir will adequately restrict peak flow<br />

as required. The sluice gate will be fastened to the existing concrete lining of the weir and supported<br />

if required to resist any hydrostatic forces that may develop on the upstream side.<br />

Golder Associates

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!