Tailpipe Rule - GlobalWarming.org
Tailpipe Rule - GlobalWarming.org
Tailpipe Rule - GlobalWarming.org
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 88 / Friday, May 7, 2010 / <strong>Rule</strong>s and Regulations<br />
25339<br />
mstockstill on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with RULES2<br />
other mobile source standards issued by<br />
EPA under the CAA. The manufacturer<br />
will be able to carry back credits to<br />
offset a deficit that had accrued in a<br />
prior model year and was subsequently<br />
carried over to the current model year.<br />
EPCA also provides for this. EPCA<br />
restricts the carry-back of CAFE credits<br />
to three years, and as proposed EPA is<br />
establishing the same limitation, in<br />
keeping with the goal of harmonizing<br />
both sets of standards.<br />
After satisfying any need to offset preexisting<br />
deficits, remaining credits can<br />
be saved (banked) for use in future<br />
years. Under the CAFE program, EISA<br />
allows manufacturers to apply credits<br />
earned in a model year to compliance in<br />
any of the five subsequent model<br />
years. 34 As proposed, under the GHG<br />
program, EPA is also allowing<br />
manufacturers to use these banked<br />
credits in the five years after the year in<br />
which they were generated (i.e., five<br />
years carry-forward).<br />
EISA required NHTSA to establish by<br />
regulation a CAFE credits transferring<br />
program, which NHTSA established in<br />
a March 2009 final rule codified at 49<br />
CFR Part 536, to allow a manufacturer<br />
to transfer credits between its vehicle<br />
fleets to achieve compliance with the<br />
standards. For example, credits earned<br />
by over-compliance with a<br />
manufacturer’s car fleet average<br />
standard could be used to offset debits<br />
incurred due to that manufacturer’s not<br />
meeting the truck fleet average standard<br />
in a given year. EPA’s Tier 2 program<br />
also provides for this type of credit<br />
transfer. As proposed for purposes of<br />
this rule, EPA allows unlimited credit<br />
transfers across a manufacturer’s cartruck<br />
fleet to meet the GHG standard.<br />
This is based on the expectation that<br />
this flexibility will facilitate<br />
manufacturers’ ability to comply with<br />
the GHG standards in the lead time<br />
provided, and will allow the required<br />
GHG emissions reductions to be<br />
achieved in the most cost effective way.<br />
Under the CAA, unlike under EISA,<br />
there is no statutory limitation on cartruck<br />
credit transfers. Therefore, EPA is<br />
not constraining car-truck credit<br />
transfers, as doing so would reduce the<br />
flexibility for lead time, and would<br />
increase costs with no corresponding<br />
environmental benefit. For the CAFE<br />
program, however, EISA limits the<br />
amount of credits that may be<br />
transferred, which has the effects of<br />
limiting the extent to which a<br />
manufacturer can rely upon credits in<br />
lieu of making fuel economy<br />
improvements to a particular portion of<br />
its vehicle fleet, but also of potentially<br />
34 49 U.S.C. 32903(a)(2).<br />
increasing the costs of improving the<br />
manufacturer’s overall fleet. EISA also<br />
prohibits the use of transferred credits<br />
to meet the statutory minimum level for<br />
the domestic car fleet standard. 35 These<br />
and other statutory limits will continue<br />
to apply to the determination of<br />
compliance with the CAFE standards.<br />
EISA also allowed NHTSA to<br />
establish by regulation a CAFE credit<br />
trading program, which NHTSA<br />
established in the March 2009 final rule<br />
at 40 CFR part 536, to allow credits to<br />
be traded (sold) to other vehicle<br />
manufacturers. As proposed, EPA<br />
allows credit trading in the GHG<br />
program. These sorts of exchanges are<br />
typically allowed under EPA’s current<br />
mobile source emission credit programs,<br />
although manufacturers have seldom<br />
made such exchanges. Under the<br />
NHTSA CAFE program, EPCA also<br />
allows these types of credit trades,<br />
although, as with transferred credits,<br />
traded credits may not be used to meet<br />
the minimum domestic car standards<br />
specified by statute. 36 Comments<br />
discussing these provisions supported<br />
the proposed approach. These final<br />
provisions are the same as proposed.<br />
As further discussed in Section IV of<br />
this preamble, NHTSA sought to find a<br />
way to provide credits for improving the<br />
efficiency of light truck air conditioners<br />
(A/Cs) and solicited public comments to<br />
that end. The agency did so because the<br />
power necessary to operate an A/C<br />
compressor places a significant<br />
additional load on the engine, thus<br />
reducing fuel economy and increasing<br />
CO 2 tailpipe emissions. See Section<br />
III.C.1 below. The agency would have<br />
made a similar effort regarding cars, but<br />
a 1975 statutory provision made it<br />
unfruitful even to explore the possibility<br />
of administratively proving such credits<br />
for cars. The agency did not identify a<br />
workable way of providing such credits<br />
for light trucks in the context of this<br />
rulemaking.<br />
b. Air Conditioning Credits Under the<br />
EPA Final <strong>Rule</strong><br />
Air conditioning (A/C) systems<br />
contribute to GHG emissions in two<br />
ways. Hydrofluorocarbon (HFC)<br />
refrigerants, which are powerful GHGs,<br />
can leak from the A/C system (direct A/<br />
C emissions). As just noted, operation of<br />
the A/C system also places an additional<br />
load on the engine, which results in<br />
additional CO 2 tailpipe emissions<br />
(indirect A/C related emissions). EPA is<br />
allowing manufacturers to generate<br />
credits by reducing either or both types<br />
of GHG emissions related to A/C<br />
35 49 U.S.C. 32903(g)(4).<br />
36 49 U.S.C. 32903(f)(2).<br />
VerDate Mar2010 20:30 May 06, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\07MYR2.SGM 07MYR2<br />
systems. Specifically, EPA is<br />
establishing a method to calculate CO 2<br />
equivalent reductions for the vehicle’s<br />
full useful life on a grams/mile basis<br />
that can be used as credits in meeting<br />
the fleet average CO 2 standards. EPA’s<br />
analysis indicates that this approach<br />
provides manufacturers with a highly<br />
cost-effective way to achieve a portion<br />
of GHG emissions reductions under the<br />
EPA program. EPA is estimating that<br />
manufacturers will on average generate<br />
11 g/mi GHG credit toward meeting the<br />
250 g/mi by 2016 (though some<br />
companies may generate more). EPA<br />
will also allow manufacturers to earn<br />
early A/C credits starting in MY 2009<br />
through 2011, as discussed further in a<br />
later section. There were many<br />
comments on the proposed A/C<br />
provisions. Nearly every one of these<br />
was supportive of EPA including A/C<br />
control as part of this rule, though there<br />
was some disagreement on some of the<br />
details of the program. The HFC<br />
crediting scheme was widely supported.<br />
The comments mainly were<br />
concentrated on indirect A/C related<br />
credits. The auto manufacturers and<br />
suppliers had some technical comments<br />
on A/C technologies, and there were<br />
many concerns with the proposed idle<br />
test. EPA has made some minor<br />
adjustments in both of these areas that<br />
we believe are responsive to these<br />
concerns. EPA addresses A/C issues in<br />
greater detail in Section III of this<br />
preamble and in Chapter 2 of EPA’s<br />
RIA.<br />
c. Flexible-Fuel and Alternative Fuel<br />
Vehicle Credits<br />
EPCA authorizes a compliance<br />
flexibility incentive under the CAFE<br />
program for production of dual-fueled<br />
or flexible-fuel vehicles (FFV) and<br />
dedicated alternative fuel vehicles.<br />
FFVs are vehicles that can run both on<br />
an alternative fuel and conventional<br />
fuel. Most FFVs are E85 capable<br />
vehicles, which can run on either<br />
gasoline or a mixture of up to 85 percent<br />
ethanol and 15 percent gasoline (E85).<br />
Dedicated alternative fuel vehicles are<br />
vehicles that run exclusively on an<br />
alternative fuel. EPCA was amended by<br />
EISA to extend the period of availability<br />
of the FFV incentive, but to begin<br />
phasing it out by annually reducing the<br />
amount of FFV incentive that can be<br />
used toward compliance with the CAFE<br />
standards. 37 Although NHTSA<br />
37 EPCA provides a statutory incentive for<br />
production of FFVs by specifying that their fuel<br />
economy is determined using a special calculation<br />
procedure that results in those vehicles being<br />
assigned a higher fuel economy level than would<br />
Continued