19.04.2015 Views

The Navy Vol_37_Part2 (Aug-Sep-Oct, Nov-Dec 1975-Jan 1976)

The Navy Vol_37_Part2 (Aug-Sep-Oct, Nov-Dec 1975-Jan 1976)

The Navy Vol_37_Part2 (Aug-Sep-Oct, Nov-Dec 1975-Jan 1976)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

It was probably as a result of their<br />

success with MOSKVA, and her sister<br />

LENINGRAD, that the Russians<br />

decided to build KIEV, the first of<br />

their 40.000 ton aircraft carriers.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se big 30 knot ships will be<br />

capable of operating 25 Freehand<br />

VSTOL aircraft, together with 25<br />

ASW helicopters. <strong>The</strong>y will carry a<br />

heavy SAM armament, but no SSGW<br />

armament is planned. For reasons<br />

which are not clear to observers.<br />

KIEV is expected to carry a<br />

surprisingly heavy gun armament —<br />

twenty-eight 57mm guns in twin<br />

mountings on sponsons. either side<br />

of the quarter deck, and forward, at<br />

a height above sea level that is likely<br />

to make them wet in heavy seas.<br />

In 1974. the Italian <strong>Navy</strong><br />

announced its intention of constructing<br />

an additional helicopter<br />

cruiser, capable of operating VSTOL<br />

aircraft. This new ship will join the<br />

t.iree helicopter cruisers (VITTORIO<br />

VENETO. ANDREA DORIA and CAIO<br />

DUILIO) already in service with the<br />

Italian <strong>Navy</strong>. Although, as yet. the<br />

Italians operate no VSTOL aircraft,<br />

they have conducted a series of deck<br />

landing trials with a Harrier. As is to<br />

be expected, the Italian ships are<br />

designed for Mediterranean distances<br />

and sea conditions.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Brazilian <strong>Navy</strong>'s i .w<br />

construction programme includes a<br />

helicopter carrier, presumably to<br />

replace her existing aircraft carrier<br />

N. Ac L. MINAS GERAIS (which<br />

served as HMAS VENGEANCE from<br />

1953-5 r )<br />

<strong>The</strong> United States <strong>Navy</strong>'s Destroyer (DDj SPRUANCE, the name<br />

ship oj the class oj which 30 will be built. SPRUANCE (DD963) was<br />

launched on 10 <strong>Nov</strong>ember, 1973, and commissioned in <strong>Oct</strong>ober, 1974.<br />

Vessels oj this class were designed primarily jor anti-submarine<br />

warfare.<br />

An Australian Role<br />

For An SAP?<br />

HMAS MELBOURNE is a Seaborne<br />

Air Platform. It is the ship's hull,<br />

machinery and accommodation<br />

that are forcing her retirement. Her<br />

aircraft are not obsolete. On the<br />

contrary, the US <strong>Navy</strong> have this year<br />

requested the construction of more<br />

SKYHAWKS. and the SEA KING is<br />

widely regarded as the best antisubmarine<br />

helicopter in the world.<br />

Classed as a support carrier (CVS).<br />

MELBOURNE has two alternative<br />

aircraft complements. She is a ship<br />

with two interchangeable armaments<br />

that can be embarked<br />

according to the tactical role she is<br />

expected to perform.<br />

MELBOURNE'S Tracker aircraft<br />

and Sea King helicopters can<br />

provide a formidable anti-submarine<br />

force Her SKYHAWKS are very<br />

effective aircraft in the anti-ship<br />

role, as protection against hostile<br />

Long Range Maritime Patrol (LRMP)<br />

or long range SSGW control aircraft,<br />

and in support of ground troops<br />

operating in remote areas where the<br />

paucity of operational airfields<br />

suitable for land-based aircraft is a<br />

serious difficulty — a situation particularly<br />

applicable to many parts of<br />

CONTRIBUTIONS INVITED<br />

Australia now. and. for cost and<br />

population distribution reasons,<br />

likely to obtain for the foreseeable<br />

future.<br />

Australian trade must have protection<br />

against these forms of attack. A<br />

decision must be made as to how<br />

these forms of attack can be prevented<br />

after MELBOURNE'S retirement.<br />

It is the protection, not necessarily<br />

the ship, that must be replaced. This<br />

can be done in two ways:<br />

• Land based aircraft and helicopters<br />

operating from escorts.<br />

• VSTOL aircraft and helicopters<br />

operating from a Seaborne Air Platform.<br />

<strong>The</strong> former method would require<br />

substantial expenditure upon<br />

additional aircraft and more of the<br />

first class airfields essential to their<br />

operation. Even if there were enough<br />

<strong>The</strong> editor invites persons to submit articles, photographs and drawings (black ink) for<br />

inclusion in the maga/me. but regrets that no payment can be made for contributions sub<br />

mitted Contributions should be addressed <strong>The</strong> Editor "<strong>The</strong> <strong>Navy</strong> Bo* CI 78 Clarence Street<br />

Post Office Sydney NSW 2000 Australia<br />

Authors are requested to include a photograph of themselves together with brief biographical<br />

particulars<br />

<strong>The</strong> Editor does not hold himself responsible for manuscripts though every effort will he<br />

made to return those with which a stamped and addressed envelope is enclosed<br />

of them, the RAAF's Mirages have far<br />

too small a radius of action to<br />

provide the protection necessary.<br />

Information published about<br />

potential replacements for the<br />

Mirages indicates that none offers<br />

sufficient improvement in radius of<br />

action to resolve the maritime<br />

problem without new first class<br />

airfields.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se are factors senior Defence<br />

Advisors will take into account when<br />

making their recommendation to<br />

the Government. It is to be hoped<br />

that whoever is Minister for Defence<br />

at the time will avoid the mistake of<br />

becoming politically committed for.<br />

or against, the project before he has<br />

received the experts' recommendation<br />

with supporting facts.<br />

For <strong>The</strong> Ran —<br />

TDCor SCS?<br />

With the possible exception of the<br />

Russian ships, none of the types<br />

examined above are strategic strike<br />

weapons systems. <strong>The</strong>y are not<br />

suitable for launching opposed air<br />

strikes against targets overseas.<br />

Both the TDC and the SCS could<br />

fulfil an Australian need to provide<br />

air and ASW protection for merchantmen<br />

trading with Australia.<br />

<strong>The</strong> TDC carries in one hull all the<br />

weapons necessary for defence<br />

against deep water surface, subsurface<br />

and air attack, with the<br />

advantages of the economy of scale.<br />

But all the eggs are in one basket —<br />

the whole unit would have to be<br />

deployed even if only one type of<br />

threat was expected. <strong>The</strong> TDC is an<br />

expensive and complex ship that<br />

would be difficult, if not<br />

impracticable, to build in Australia.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Sea Control Ships would need<br />

SAM/SSGW armed escorts (the<br />

patrol frigates, now known as FFGs.<br />

and our modernised DDGs. will have<br />

that ability). <strong>The</strong> relatively simple<br />

hull and machinery of the SCS would<br />

make construction in Australia a<br />

practical possibility. <strong>The</strong> much<br />

smaller crew would facilitate the<br />

operation of two SCS by the RAN. In<br />

appropriate tactical circumstances.<br />

FFGs and DDGs could be deployed<br />

separately from the SCS. <strong>The</strong> fact<br />

that all three types. SCS. FFG and<br />

To "<strong>The</strong> Na»y",<br />

Box CI78, Clarence Street Post Office.<br />

Sydney, NSW. 2000, Australia.<br />

DDG. are US-designed would<br />

promote compatibility of systems<br />

used in the ships.<br />

Within the next twelve months, the<br />

RAN will have to make its choice.<br />

Unit costs and manpower may well<br />

compel a choice between two SCSs<br />

and one TDC. It will be a choice of<br />

very considerable consequence to<br />

both the Australian defence and to<br />

Australian industry.<br />

SUBSCRIPTION FORM<br />

I enclose $2.50 being 'subscription to "<strong>The</strong> <strong>Navy</strong>*'<br />

Australia for 1 Vt years (refer notes below).<br />

Name..<br />

Street..<br />

Suburb.<br />

State<br />

Postcode<br />

(Please Print Clearly)<br />

maga/ine<br />

within<br />

Please make cheques, postal orders or money orders payable to '<strong>The</strong> <strong>Navy</strong><br />

Leagne".<br />

Subscriptions commcncc in <strong>Jan</strong>uary of each year and a subscription reminder<br />

notice is forwarded to current subscribers — Annual Subscription (Australian<br />

Dollars) within Australia S2 — Beyond Australia $3.70 (sea mail) — $6.70<br />

(air mail).<br />

* Persons within Australia commencing subscriptions to "<strong>The</strong> <strong>Navy</strong>"<br />

magazine during the quarter commencing APRIL (ie. sub for Ifc years)<br />

should remit $3.50: JULY (sub for I * years) $3: and OCTOBER (sub for IV»<br />

years) $2.50.<br />

NOTICE TO ADVERTISERS<br />

Tha Trad* Practices Act. 1974 c«m« into tore* on <strong>Oct</strong>ober 1. 1974. <strong>The</strong>re are important naw provisions in that Act which contain stnet raguiationj<br />

on advertising and all advertisers and advertising agents are advised to study those provisions very carefully<br />

It can be »n offence for anyona to engage, in trade or commerce, in conduct • misleading or deceptive'. In particular Section S3 contains<br />

prohibitions from doing any of tha following in connaction with tha supply of goods or services or in connaction with tha promotion, by any maen»,<br />

of tha supply or use of goods or services:<br />

(a) Falsely rapresent that goods or tarvices are of a particular standard, quality or grade, or that goods are of a particular style or model;<br />

(b) Falsely rapresent that goods are new:<br />

(c) Represent that goods or services have sponsorship, approval, performance characteristics, accessorial uses or benafits thay do not<br />

have<br />

(d) Represent that ha or it has a sponsorship, approval or affiliation ha or it does not have:<br />

(a) Make false or misleading statemants concerning tha eustence of. or amounts of. poca reductions;<br />

(f) Make falsa or misleading statemants concerning the naed for any goods, services, raplacements or rapairs:<br />

(g) Make false or misleedmg statements concerning tha eaistence or effect of any warranty or guarantee<br />

PENALTY;<br />

For an individual — $10,000 or 6 months impnsonmant.<br />

For a corporation — $50,000<br />

It is not possible for this company to ensura that advertisements which are published in this magaime comply with tha Act and tha rasponsibritty<br />

must tharafora be on tha parson, company or advertising agancy submitting tha advertisements for publication.<br />

IN CASE or DOUBT CONSULT YOUR LAWYER<br />

Page Sixteen THE NAVY <strong>Aug</strong>/<strong>Sep</strong>t/<strong>Oct</strong>, <strong>1975</strong><br />

<strong>Aug</strong>/SapV<strong>Oct</strong>, <strong>1975</strong> THE MAW Page Seventeen

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!