01.05.2015 Views

o_19k6fnuqr4ap1kbjthf1mug1eigh.pdf

Transform your PDFs into Flipbooks and boost your revenue!

Leverage SEO-optimized Flipbooks, powerful backlinks, and multimedia content to professionally showcase your products and significantly increase your reach.

Brain and Cognition xxx (2011) xxx–xxx<br />

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect<br />

Brain and Cognition<br />

journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/b&c<br />

Emotions induced by operatic music: Psychophysiological effects of music, plot,<br />

and acting<br />

A scientist’s tribute to Maria Callas<br />

Felicia Rodica Baltesß, Julia Avram, Mircea Miclea, Andrei C. Miu ⇑<br />

Emotion and Cognition Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, CJ 400015, Romania<br />

article<br />

info<br />

abstract<br />

Article history:<br />

Accepted 31 January 2011<br />

Available online xxxx<br />

Keywords:<br />

Operatic music<br />

Music-induced emotions<br />

Physiological differentiation of emotions<br />

Operatic music involves both singing and acting (as well as rich audiovisual background arising from the<br />

orchestra and elaborate scenery and costumes) that multiply the mechanisms by which emotions are<br />

induced in listeners. The present study investigated the effects of music, plot, and acting performance<br />

on emotions induced by opera. There were three experimental conditions: (1) participants listened to<br />

a musically complex and dramatically coherent excerpt from Tosca; (2) they read a summary of the plot<br />

and listened to the same musical excerpt again; and (3) they re-listened to music while they watched the<br />

subtitled film of this acting performance. In addition, a control condition was included, in which an independent<br />

sample of participants succesively listened three times to the same musical excerpt. We measured<br />

subjective changes using both dimensional, and specific music-induced emotion questionnaires.<br />

Cardiovascular, electrodermal, and respiratory responses were also recorded, and the participants kept<br />

track of their musical chills. Music listening alone elicited positive emotion and autonomic arousal, seen<br />

in faster heart rate, but slower respiration rate and reduced skin conductance. Knowing the (sad) plot<br />

while listening to the music a second time reduced positive emotions (peacefulness, joyful activation),<br />

and increased negative ones (sadness), while high autonomic arousal was maintained. Watching the acting<br />

performance increased emotional arousal and changed its valence again (from less positive/sad to<br />

transcendent), in the context of continued high autonomic arousal. The repeated exposure to music<br />

did not by itself induce this pattern of modifications. These results indicate that the multiple musical<br />

and dramatic means involved in operatic performance specifically contribute to the genesis of musicinduced<br />

emotions and their physiological correlates.<br />

Ó 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.<br />

‘‘Maria Callas exploded the concept of what beautiful singing<br />

means: Is it pretty sounds and pure tones? Or should beauty<br />

evolve from text, musical shape, dramatic intent and, especially,<br />

emotional truth?’’<br />

(Anthony Tommassini in ‘‘A Voice and a Legend That Still Fascinate;<br />

Callas Is What Opera Should Be’’, The New York Times, September<br />

15, 1997)<br />

Abbreviations: DBP, diastolic blood pressure; ECG, electrocardiogram; GEMS,<br />

Geneva Emotional Music Scale; HF-HRV, power in the high frequency band of HRV;<br />

HR, heart rate; HRV, heart rate variability; IBI, cardiac interbeat intervals; LF-HRV,<br />

power in the low frequency band of HRV; NA, negative affect; PA, positive affect;<br />

PANAS, Positive and Negative Affect Schedule; RR, respiratory rate; RSA, respiratory<br />

sinus arrhythmia; SAM, Self-Assessment Manikin; SBP, systolic blood pressure; SCL,<br />

skin conductance level; SEM, standard error of the mean; VLF-HRV, power in the<br />

very low frequency band of HRV.<br />

⇑ Corresponding author. Address: 37 Republicii, Cluj-Napoca, CJ 400015,<br />

Romania. Fax: +40 264 590967.<br />

E-mail address: andreimiu@gmail.com (A.C. Miu).<br />

1. Introduction<br />

We are often emotionally moved by musical performances.<br />

However, emotions induced by music have only recently drawn<br />

the attention of scholars in cognitive and affective sciences (Juslin<br />

& Vastfjall, 2008; Scherer & Zentner, 2001). Field studies have<br />

confirmed that music pervades everyday life and some of its most<br />

important functions are related to mood change and emotion regulation<br />

(DeNora, 1999; Juslin, Liljestrom, Vastfjall, Barradas, &<br />

Silva, 2008; Sloboda & O’Neil, 2001). In daily life, music generally<br />

increases positive affect, alertness, and focus in the present<br />

(Sloboda, O’Neil, & Ivaldi, 2001). In addition, it provides opportunities<br />

for venting strong emotions, increasing their intensity, or<br />

calming down (DeNora, 1999). Therefore, music has been related<br />

to the genesis and control of emotions.<br />

Despite previous debates on whether music induces emotions in<br />

listeners (i.e., the so-called ‘‘emotivist’’ position), or only expresses<br />

emotions that listeners can recognize (i.e., the ‘‘cognitivist’’<br />

0278-2626/$ - see front matter Ó 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.<br />

doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2011.01.012<br />

Please cite this article in press as: Baltesß, F. R., et al. Emotions induced by operatic music: Psychophysiological effects of music, plot, and acting. Brain and<br />

Cognition (2011), doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2011.01.012


2 F.R. Baltesß et al. / Brain and Cognition xxx (2011) xxx–xxx<br />

position) (Kivy, 1990; Scherer & Zentner, 2001), the recent literature<br />

has generally supported the former view that music induces<br />

subjective (e.g., self-reported sadness), behavioral (e.g., crying),<br />

and physiological changes (e.g., heart rate [HR – see list of acronyms]<br />

deceleration) that are characteristic of emotions (Bharucha,<br />

Curtis, & Paroo, 2006; Juslin & Vastfjall, 2008; Koelsch, 2005;<br />

Scherer & Zentner, 2001). In addition, the mechanisms by which<br />

music induces emotions (e.g., semantic associations, emotional<br />

contagion based on observation of facial and vocal expressions;<br />

see Bezdek & Gerrig, 2008; Hietanen, Surakka, & Linnankoski,<br />

1998; Lundqvist & Dimberg, 1995) may not be specific to music,<br />

but this possibility has only recently started to be investigated<br />

(for reviews, see Juslin & Vastfjall, 2008; Scherer & Zentner,<br />

2001). The present report stems from the emotivist approach,<br />

and will examine the effects of opera on listeners’ physiological responses<br />

and subjective ratings of their own emotions.<br />

One way to investigate these issues has been to identify physiological<br />

responses during music listening (e.g., Krumhansl, 1997;<br />

Nyklícek, Thayer, & Van Doornen, 1997). This approach has extended<br />

the studies on the physiological differentiation of emotions<br />

induced by facial expressions (e.g., Ekman, Levenson, & Friesen,<br />

1983), images (e.g., Codispoti, Bradley, & Lang, 2001), and even natural<br />

sounds (e.g., Bradley & Lang, 2000). Previous studies indicated<br />

that only certain emotions (e.g., fear, disgust) can be distinguished<br />

based on their autonomic signatures (for review see Levenson,<br />

1992), but the effect sizes were small or medium at best (Cacioppo,<br />

Berntsen, Klein, & Poehlmann, 1997). These findings are not surprising<br />

considering the limited emotional saliency of images and<br />

words presented in laboratory settings. Recent psychophysiological<br />

studies have used more complex stimuli such as films, and consequently<br />

induced more robust experiences of emotion and<br />

physiological responses (e.g., Frazier, Strauss, & Steinhauer, 2004;<br />

Kreibig, Wilhelm, Roth, & Gross, 2007).<br />

1.1. Psychophysiology of music-induced emotions<br />

Like films, music has been shown to produce physiological<br />

changes that can distinguish between emotions. In two landmark<br />

studies, Krumhansl (1997), and Nyklícek et al. (1997) measured a<br />

large array of cardiovascular, respiratory, and electrodermal responses<br />

in association with self-report measures of emotions induced<br />

by music. Emotions were differentiated based on certain<br />

physiological responses such as respiratory sinus arrhythmia<br />

(RSA) and cardiac interbeat intervals (IBI) (Nyklícek et al., 1997).<br />

For instance, sadness ratings correlated positively with IBI, systolic<br />

(SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and negatively with skin<br />

conductance level (SCL) (Khalfa, Peretz, Blondin, & Manon, 2002;<br />

Krumhansl, 1997). Emotional arousal was best explained by physiological<br />

changes, which accounted for 62.5% of the variance<br />

(Nyklícek et al., 1997). There is only one psychophysiological field<br />

study that measured emotional ratings, electrodermal and respiratory<br />

responses in a sample of spectators (i.e., 27 listeners) during<br />

several live performances of Wagner’s operas given in the festival<br />

theater of Bayreuth in 1987–1988 (Vaitl, Vehrs, & Sternagel,<br />

1993) 1 . In contrast to laboratory studies, these limited field results<br />

suggested that physiological responses differed between opera leitmotivs,<br />

but there was a weak correspondence between physiological<br />

and subjective measures of emotions.<br />

Psychophysiological studies have thus focused on the coherence<br />

between subjective, behavioral, and physiological components of<br />

music-induced emotions. Lundqvist, Carlsson, and Juslin (2009) reported<br />

an association between music-induced happiness and<br />

1 A recent laboratory study on psychophysiological changes induced by opera came<br />

to our attention while this article was under review. See Bernardi et al. (2009).<br />

greater SCL, and supported the emotivist position. In contrast, another<br />

study found that increased emotional arousal occurred without<br />

changes in SCL (Grewe, Nagel, Kopiez, & Altenmuller, 2007a).<br />

The latter pattern of results was interpreted as evidence for the<br />

cognitivist position, although the participants were clearly instructed<br />

to rate the emotional arousal they felt, and not that expressed<br />

by the music. These apparently divergent results might<br />

be explained by methodological differences, considering that one<br />

study used a self-report instrument that measured changes in several<br />

basic emotions (Lundqvist et al., 2009), and the other measured<br />

changes in arousal and valence across emotions (Grewe<br />

et al., 2007a). In addition, there are emotions specifically induced<br />

by music that are not captured by basic emotion measures such<br />

as the one used by Lundqvist et al. (2009).<br />

1.2. Specific music-induced emotions<br />

It has been argued that aesthetic emotions are deeper and more<br />

significant (Sloboda, 1992), nuanced and subtle (Scherer & Zentner,<br />

2001) than other more general emotions. Indeed, the range of music-induced<br />

emotions goes beyond the emotions captured by the<br />

basic emotion models. A recent field study showed that a nine-factor<br />

model best fitted the emotion descriptors that were chosen by<br />

music listeners who attended a classical music festival (Zentner,<br />

Grandjean, & Scherer, 2008). It included emotion categories (e.g.,<br />

wonder, transcendence) that are not part of any current model of<br />

emotion. The Geneva Emotional Music Scale (GEMS) is the first<br />

questionnaire designed to measure music-induced emotions<br />

(Zentner et al., 2008). To our knowledge, no study has investigated<br />

the correlation between physiological responses and music-induced<br />

emotions measured by GEMS.<br />

1.3. Music-induced chills<br />

Music-induced emotions are often accompanied by physical<br />

sensations such as chills (i.e., tremor or tingling sensations passing<br />

through the body as the result of sudden keen emotion or excitement).<br />

Two landmark studies indicated that the great majority of<br />

people were susceptible to chills (Sloboda, 1991), and these bodily<br />

phenomena were associated with music-induced emotions, especially<br />

sadness and melancholy (Panksepp, 1995). Musical events<br />

such as crescendos or a solo instrument (e.g., a soprano’s voice)<br />

emerging from a softer orchestral background induced chills<br />

(Grewe, Nagel, Kopiez, & Altenmuller, 2007b; Panksepp, 1995).<br />

Psychophysiological studies have shown that music-induced chills<br />

correlated with increases in SCL and HR (Grewe et al., 2007b;<br />

Rickard, 2004). The present study aims to integrate the measurement<br />

of chills, music-induced emotions reflected by GEMS, and a<br />

wider range of physiological changes.<br />

1.4. The duration of musical stimuli<br />

One important aspect that differentiates studies of music-induced<br />

emotions is the duration of stimuli. For instance, many studies<br />

used short (i.e., several seconds), monotonic musical stimuli. It<br />

has been suggested that even less than one second of music is sufficient<br />

to prime an emotional meaning (e.g., Bigand, Vieillard,<br />

Madurell, Marozeau, & Dacquet, 2005; Peretz, Blood, Penhune, &<br />

Zatorre, 2001; Watt & Ash, 1998). However, this approach has at<br />

least two limitations. First, it usually involves forced-choice responses<br />

that increase the difficulty of emotional valence processing<br />

(Bigand et al., 2005; Peretz et al., 2001). Second, the correct<br />

categorization of the emotional content of music may only reflect<br />

the emotions that listeners perceive in music. One second may<br />

not be enough time to develop an emotional response. At any rate,<br />

longer durations of musical stimuli increase the magnitude of<br />

Please cite this article in press as: Baltesß, F. R., et al. Emotions induced by operatic music: Psychophysiological effects of music, plot, and acting. Brain and<br />

Cognition (2011), doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2011.01.012


F.R. Baltesß et al. / Brain and Cognition xxx (2011) xxx–xxx 3<br />

psychophysiological responses in music-induced emotions (Witvliet<br />

& Vrana, 2007). Psychophysiological studies generally used longer<br />

stimuli (i.e., ranging from 6 to 600 s), and it has been argued that<br />

the use of full music pieces has greater external validity when<br />

investigating emotional responses to music (Grewe et al., 2007a;<br />

Nater, Abbruzzese, Krebs, & Ehlert, 2006; Rickard, 2004).<br />

1.5. Multiple sources of emotion in operatic music<br />

The duration of musical stimuli, as well as the integration of<br />

music with congruent visual and verbal cues are important contributors<br />

to emotional responses that people develop to musical<br />

performance (Bezdek & Gerrig, 2008; Scherer & Zentner, 2001).<br />

Operatic music performance involves both singing and acting,<br />

which multiplies the mechanisms by which emotions are induced<br />

in listeners. Opera adds the power of the dramatic plot and the personality<br />

of the performer to the affective message of the musical<br />

score and the emotional expressivity of voice (Scherer, 1995).<br />

The rich audiovisual background arising from the orchestra and<br />

elaborate scenery and costumes are also important. The objective<br />

of the present study was to investigate for the first time the cumulative<br />

contributions of music listening, learning the context of the<br />

events it portrays (i.e., plot), and watching the acting performance<br />

to emotions induced by opera.<br />

These sources may support the genesis of emotion either independently<br />

or in concert. Research on film music supports the latter<br />

possibility. For instance, music presented during the opening scene<br />

of a film influenced the emotional valence of words that participants<br />

used in their continuations of the narratives (Vitouch,<br />

2001). In addition, judgments of characters displaying neutral<br />

emotions were significantly affected by the emotional content of<br />

the music that accompanied the film (Tan, Spackman, & Bezdek,<br />

2007). Lyrics are also important in emotional responses to music.<br />

For instance, the emotional effects of music and lyrics were investigated<br />

by combining musical excerpts with lyrics that conveyed<br />

the same emotion or another emotion (Ali & Peynircioglu, 2006;<br />

Stratton & Zalanowski, 1994). These studies indicated that lyrics<br />

enhanced emotion in sad and angry music. Furthermore, these<br />

emotions readily transferred to images that were arbitrarily associated<br />

with songs (Ali & Peynircioglu, 2006). In addition, visual<br />

cues such as facial expressions are preattentively integrated with<br />

vocal cues and influence the emotional judgment of the latter (de<br />

Gelder, Bocker, Tuomainen, Hensen, & Vroomen, 1999). Therefore,<br />

it seems likely that facial expressions of singers influence the emotional<br />

processing of music. Overall, music, lyrics, and visual cues<br />

seem to significantly contribute to the genesis of music-induced<br />

emotions, and their concerted contribution may explain why operatic<br />

music is so effective in inducing emotions. However, this complex<br />

issue has not been investigated to date.<br />

1.6. Objectives of the present study<br />

We investigated subjective and physiological emotional responses<br />

to operatic music. In order to maximize external validity,<br />

we chose a dramatically coherent and musically complex excerpt<br />

from Tosca by Giacomo Puccini. The soprano Maria Callas and the<br />

baritone Tito Gobbi gave a legendary interpretation of the main<br />

characters in Tosca, and their 1964 live performance at Covent Garden<br />

was fortunately recorded on film. In this performance, both artists<br />

impress by their emotional identification with the characters,<br />

and the way they deliver the mixture of lust and hate, fear, emotional<br />

vulnerability and indignation through their voice (Huck,<br />

1984). Studying the psychophysiology of emotion during this performance<br />

offers us an opportunity to catch a scientific glimpse of<br />

the emotional force that artists such as Maria Callas have inspired.<br />

The present study had three experimental conditions that<br />

investigated the contributions of music, plot, and acting performance<br />

to emotional responses. First, participants listened to the<br />

musical excerpt. Then, they read a summary of the plot and listened<br />

to the same musical excerpt again. In the third condition,<br />

they re-listened to music while they watched the subtitled film<br />

of this acting performance. In between conditions, we measured<br />

music-induced emotions using both dimensional, and specific music-induced<br />

emotion questionnaires. During the experimental conditions,<br />

cardiovascular, electrodermal and respiratory responses<br />

were continuously recorded, and the participants kept track of<br />

their musical chills.<br />

Since there are very few psychophysiological studies of emotions<br />

in operatic music (and operatic music is so diverse), the present<br />

study was consequently exploratory. Based on the musical and<br />

dramatic content of this musical excerpt, we expected that it<br />

would induce a pattern of emotions characterized by increased<br />

unpleasant emotions (e.g., sadness) and decreased pleasant emotions<br />

(e.g., joyful activation, peacefulness). In addition, based on<br />

the literature in related areas (e.g., sadness induced by films), we<br />

expected a change in the sympathovagal balance, with vagal withdrawal<br />

and sympathetic activation, as well as decreases of SCL and<br />

respiratory rate (RR). We were specifically interested in the way<br />

each successive layer of complexity influenced music-induced<br />

emotions and their physiological correlates.<br />

2. Methods<br />

2.1. Participants<br />

N = 37 healthy, right-handed Romanian volunteers (25 women;<br />

mean age = 21.4 years, ranging between 19 and 24 years), with<br />

good hearing, were selected for this study (out of an initial pool<br />

of 45 volunteers). The sample size was determined by using a priori<br />

statistical power analysis (power = 0.95; alpha = 0.05; effect<br />

size f = 0.25) run in the G-Power 3.1 software (Faul, Erdfelder, Lang,<br />

& Buchner, 2007). The participants had no significant musical education,<br />

but they reported that music was an important part of their<br />

lives. None of the participants reported having listened to Tosca before,<br />

a preference for classic or operatic music, or understood Italian.<br />

These inclusion criteria were important in order to control for<br />

the degree of familiarity with the selected musical piece, and<br />

understanding of the lyrics. None of the participants reported cardiovascular<br />

or neurological problems, or any kind of medical treatment<br />

that would interfere with cardiovascular and autonomic<br />

functions. Participants were asked to refrain from alcohol, caffeine<br />

and smoking at least four hours before the experiment. All the participants<br />

signed an informed consent to participate to the experiment<br />

and the procedures complied with the recommendations of<br />

the Declaration of Helsinki for human studies.<br />

2.2. Materials<br />

We used an excerpt from Giacomo Puccini’s Tosca (Act II), filmed<br />

at Covent Garden in 1964, starring Maria Callas as Floria Tosca, Tito<br />

Gobbi as Scarpia, and Renato Cioni as Mario Cavaradossi (Zeffirelli,<br />

2002). We selected and juxtaposed two excerpts (i.e., excerpt 1 from<br />

11 0 :00 00 [Scarpia: Ed or fra noi parliam da buoni amici]to22 0 :31 00 [Scarpia:<br />

Io? Voi!], and excerpt 2 from 23 0 :36 00 [Tosca: Quanto?]to31 0 :35 00<br />

[Tosca: Perché me ne rimuneri cosi?]) for the following reasons. First,<br />

these excerpts contain the plot (see Supplementary materials)<br />

involving all the three main characters (i.e., Tosca, Scarpia, and Cavaradossi).<br />

Second, these excerpts are musically and dramatically<br />

heterogenous, with a variety of rhythmical dynamics, ascending<br />

and descending scales, large vocal range and emotional tension. In<br />

Please cite this article in press as: Baltesß, F. R., et al. Emotions induced by operatic music: Psychophysiological effects of music, plot, and acting. Brain and<br />

Cognition (2011), doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2011.01.012


4 F.R. Baltesß et al. / Brain and Cognition xxx (2011) xxx–xxx<br />

addition, our approach to inducing music-related emotions explicitly<br />

relied on using longer excerpts (e.g., 19 0 :30 00 in the present study)<br />

from popular operatic compositions in order to credibly replicate the<br />

musical context that induces emotions in the real world (Grewe<br />

et al., 2007a; Juslin & Vastfjall, 2008; Rickard, 2004). Music was presented<br />

using Technics RP-F600 high-quality noise canceling closed<br />

headphones. Before the start of the experiment, a test tone was<br />

played, giving participants the opportunity to adjust the loudness<br />

to an individually comfortable level. After the participants read the<br />

plot before the second experimental condition, the experimenters<br />

checked how well the plot was understood by asking the participants<br />

the following questions: (1) who are the main characters; (2)<br />

what happens in this opera; and (3) what happens in this excerpt<br />

of the opera? The great majority of the participants answered correctly<br />

to these questions, but those who omitted or were not sure<br />

of certain details were allowed to read the summary of the plot again<br />

and assisted with supplementary explanations by the experimenters.<br />

This experimental condition started only after each participant<br />

correctly answered all the questions regarding the plot. The video<br />

was displayed on a Samsung SyncMaster 205BW monitor<br />

(50.8 cm), located 1.5 m in front of the participant’s chair. The experimental<br />

room was small and dimly lit, and was maintained at a comfortable<br />

ambient temperature.<br />

2.3. Procedure<br />

There were three conditions of musical experience: (1) music<br />

listening; (2) music re-listening after learning the plot; and (3) music<br />

re-listening while watching the acting performance. Previous<br />

studies revealed that the psychophysiological responses induced<br />

by music are not significantly affected by repeated exposure<br />

(Grewe et al., 2007a, 2007b). However, we also included a control<br />

condition in which an independent sample of N = 9 participants<br />

(five women) successively listened three times to the same musical<br />

excerpt, in order to check whether the repeated exposure to music<br />

influenced the subjective and physiological measures. The same<br />

questionnaires and physiological recordings were used in the main<br />

experiment and the supplementary control condition, except SBP<br />

and DBP that were not measured in the latter condition. The participants<br />

in this control experiment met all the inclusion criteria that<br />

applied to the main experiment.<br />

At the arrival to the laboratory, each participant completed the<br />

general scales of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS-<br />

I) (Watson & Clark, 1994), in order to control for differences in<br />

affective mood before the start of the experiment. After a habituation<br />

period during which participants were explained that several<br />

non-invasive recordings will be taken during music listening, the<br />

physiological electrodes for SCL and electrocardiogram (ECG), as<br />

well as the respiration transducer and an arm cuff coupled to an<br />

automatic blood pressure monitor were attached. Participants<br />

were instructed to sit comfortably and relax, and carefully listen<br />

to the music while monitoring the music-related emotions they<br />

felt without trying to control them in any way. They were instructed<br />

to identify emotions they felt during music listening,<br />

and not emotions that the music expressed. They were also requested<br />

to keep a count on a scratch sheet of the number of chills<br />

they experienced during each condition.<br />

Each condition was preceded by a 5 min interval during which<br />

baseline physiological recordings were made. Participants completed<br />

each condition and unless they wanted a break, they moved<br />

onto the following condition. First, they listened to the musical excerpt.<br />

In the second condition, they were given a summary of the<br />

plot (see Supplementary materials). Using a brief questionnaire,<br />

the experimenters first made sure that participants understood<br />

the plot and knew the characters, and then music was played<br />

again. In the third condition, the participants listened to music<br />

while also watching the acting performance. In order to facilitate<br />

the complete understanding of the plot and acting performance,<br />

the movie was subtitled in Romanian.<br />

After each condition, participants were required to rate the<br />

emotional arousal (1 – non-arousing to 5 – arousing) and valence<br />

(1 – unpleasant to 5 – pleasant) induced by music; and completed<br />

GEMS (Zentner et al., 2008) for music-induced emotions.<br />

2.4. Self-report measures<br />

The positive (PA) and negative affect (NA) scales of PANAS-I<br />

(Watson & Clark, 1994) include 20 items each, which measure<br />

the affective mood in the past few weeks until present. Emotional<br />

arousal and valence were measured using the Self-Assessment<br />

Manikin (SAM) (Bradley & Lang, 1994). SAM is a non-verbal pictorial<br />

assessment technique that directly measures the pleasure and<br />

arousal (as well as dominance, which was not used in the present<br />

study) associated with a person’s affective reaction to a wide variety<br />

of stimuli. For the measurement of emotions induced by music<br />

(e.g., wonder, transcendence, tenderness, peacefulness), we used<br />

the long (i.e., 45 items) variant of GEMS (Zentner et al., 2008).<br />

GEMS scores are grouped on nine factors: wonder; transcendence;<br />

tenderness; nostalgia; peacefulness; power; joyful activation; tension;<br />

and sadness. Whereas the dimensional rating allowed us to<br />

document general changes of emotional arousal and valence, GEMS<br />

offered us the possibility of actually identifying the specific emotions<br />

that were induced by each experimental condition. Self-reports<br />

of chills were also collected.<br />

2.5. Physiological measures<br />

ECG, SCL, and respiration were continuously recorded during<br />

the baseline and experimental conditions, using a BIOPAC MP150<br />

system and specific electrodes and transducers. Blood pressure<br />

was intermittently measured at fixed intervals during the experimental<br />

condition.<br />

2.5.1. Cardiovascular measures<br />

ECG was recorded using disposable pregelled Ag/AgCl electrodes<br />

placed in a modified lead II configuration, at a sample rate of 500<br />

samples/s, and amplified using an ECG100C module. After visual<br />

inspection of the recordings and editing to exclude artifacts in<br />

AcqKnowledge 3.9.0.17, all the recordings were analyzed using Nevrokard<br />

7.0.1 (Intellectual Services, Ljubljana, Slovenia). We calculated<br />

HR, and HR variability (HRV) indices in the time and<br />

frequency domains: mean IBI between successive R waves (HR and<br />

IBI are negatively correlated); power in the high frequency<br />

(HF-HRV) band (0.15–0.4 Hz in adults) of HRV, also known as<br />

RSA; power in the low (LF-HRV) (0.05–0.15 Hz), and very low<br />

frequency (VLF-HRV) (0–0.05 Hz) bands of HRV, as well as LF/HF<br />

ratios. The latter three measures, obtained by spectral analysis, are<br />

reported in normalized units (see Task Force Report, 1996). RSA<br />

reflects vagal modulation of the heart, whereas LF-HRV reflects a<br />

complex interplay between sympathetic and vagal influences (see<br />

Eckberg, 1997; Kingwell et al., 1994; Miu, Heilman, & Miclea,<br />

2009; Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Electrophysiology,<br />

1996). These measures were derived from each baseline<br />

and experimental conditions. The statistical analyses of RSA included<br />

respiration frequency as covariate in order to control for<br />

the influence of respiration on this measure. Therefore, the results<br />

reported here controlled for the influence of respiration on RSA.<br />

2.5.2. Skin conductance<br />

After cleaning and abrading the skin of the palms, TSD203<br />

electrodermal response electrodes filled with isotonic gel were attached<br />

to the volar surfaces of the index and medius fingers. SCL<br />

Please cite this article in press as: Baltesß, F. R., et al. Emotions induced by operatic music: Psychophysiological effects of music, plot, and acting. Brain and<br />

Cognition (2011), doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2011.01.012


F.R. Baltesß et al. / Brain and Cognition xxx (2011) xxx–xxx 5<br />

recordings were amplified using a GSR100C module. We estimated<br />

SCL by extracting the area under the curve (lS/s) from each baseline<br />

and experimental condition, after the downdrift in the SCL<br />

waves was eliminated using the ‘‘difference’’ function of Acq-<br />

Knowledge, as described in (Bechara, Damasio, Damasio, & Lee,<br />

1999; Miu, Heilman, & Houser, 2008).<br />

2.5.3. Respiration<br />

One channel of respiration was measured using a top respiration<br />

band placed on the chest, below the breast. The data were recorded<br />

with the RSP100C module and the TSD201 Transducer of<br />

the Biopac system. TSD201 can arbitrarily measure slow to very<br />

fast thoracic and abdominal respiration patterns with no loss in<br />

signal amplitude, optimal linearity and minimal hystheresis. RR<br />

(in cycles per minute) was calculated breath by breath using Acq-<br />

Knowledge software.<br />

2.5.4. Blood pressure<br />

SBP and DBP (in millimeters of mercury) were measured intermittently<br />

with an automatic blood pressure monitor (Digital Blood<br />

Pressure monitor, Vital System) through an arm cuff at the participant’s<br />

right upper arm. Inflation was initiated at the end of the<br />

baseline, at minutes 5, 10, 15, and at the end of the musical<br />

condition.<br />

2.6. Data reduction<br />

For the continous physiological measurements (i.e., all except<br />

SBP and DBP), we calculated difference scores by subtracting each<br />

baseline measure (i.e., the quiet sitting period immediately preceding<br />

each musical experience condition) from the corresponding<br />

experimental condition measure (see Kreibig et al., 2007). In the<br />

case of SBP and DBP that were intermittently measured, we first<br />

calculated the arithmetic mean of the physiological data from<br />

baseline and experimental conditions, and then derived the same<br />

difference score. The raw scores were transformed to T scores for<br />

normalization.<br />

2.7. Statistical analysis<br />

Data were inspected for outliers (Stevens, 2002, pp. 14–17) –<br />

only 0.8% of the data were excluded. We used repeated measure<br />

ANOVA and ANCOVA, followed by post hoc tests, in order to determine<br />

whether there were differences in emotion experience and<br />

physiological responses between the musical experience conditions.<br />

Effect sizes for t-tests and AN/COVA are reported as Cohen’s<br />

d and g 2 p , and interpreted as follows: d = 0.2 or g2 p<br />

= 0.01 – small effect<br />

size; d = 0.5 or g 2 p<br />

= 0.059 – medium effect size; and d = 0.8 or<br />

g 2 p<br />

= 0.138 – large effect size (Cohen, 1988). We also used the Friedmann<br />

non-parametric test to analyze potential differences between<br />

the frequency of chills in the experimental conditions. In<br />

addition, correlation analyses allowed us to test the association between<br />

emotion experience, physiological responses, and chills.<br />

Simple regressions were used to test whether affective mood<br />

(i.e., PA and NA) predicted affect (i.e., dimensional and specific<br />

emotion ratings) and physiological responses. The data are reported<br />

in the graphs as means ± one standard error of the means<br />

(SEM).<br />

3. Results<br />

3.1. General affect<br />

A 3 (musical experience: music listening vs. learning the plot vs.<br />

watching the acting performance) 2 (sex: women vs. men)<br />

Fig. 1. Changes in emotional arousal and valence (SAM) induced by music listening<br />

(1), learning the plot (2), and watching the acting performance (3).<br />

ANCOVA indicated that musical experience had a significant main<br />

effect on self-reported emotional arousal (F[4, 32] = 6.19, p = 0.002,<br />

g 2 p<br />

= 0.12). NA and PA were included as covariates in these analyses<br />

in order to control for the affective mood of participants before the<br />

experiments.<br />

The analyses of the data from the supplementary control sample<br />

indicated that the repeated exposure to music had no significant<br />

effects on emotional arousal and valence (p= 0.3 for both)<br />

(see Supplementary Fig. 1). In addition, we compared the first music<br />

listening condition in the control experiment to the music listening<br />

condition from the main experiment, in order to verify<br />

their similarity. Indeed, there were no significant differences between<br />

the arousal (t[45] = 1.29, ns) and valence scores<br />

(t[45] = 1.23, ns) in the first conditions of the main and control<br />

experiments, respectively.<br />

Although emotional arousal and valence were not measured before<br />

the first condition because it would have been hard to find an<br />

equally complex, but emotionally neutral stimulus to which to<br />

compare the first experimental condition, we explored the affective<br />

experience that music listening induced by one sample Student t-<br />

tests. The expected mean was the mid-value of the SAM rating<br />

scale. These analyses indicated that music listening was associated<br />

with increased emotional arousal (t[35] = 2.42, p = 0.02, Cohen’s<br />

d= 0.3) and valence scores (t[35] = 8.57, p < 0.0001, Cohen’s d=<br />

1). Next, by comparing between the three experimental condition,<br />

we found that watching the acting performance significantly increased<br />

emotional arousal compared to learning the plot, and music<br />

listening (see Fig. 1). Neither the main effect of sex, nor the interaction<br />

of sex musical experience on emotional arousal and valence<br />

were statistically significant.<br />

3.2. Music-induced emotions<br />

The effects of musical experience and sex on music-induced<br />

emotions measured by GEMS were also investigated. A 3 (musical<br />

experience: music listening vs. learning the plot vs. watching the<br />

acting performance) 2 (sex: women vs. men) ANCOVA indicated<br />

that musical experience induced specific emotions. NA and PA<br />

were again included as covariates in these analyses.<br />

The analyses of the data from the supplementary control sample<br />

indicated that the repeated exposure to music had no significant<br />

effects on any of the GEMS measures (p > 0.1 for all) (see<br />

Please cite this article in press as: Baltesß, F. R., et al. Emotions induced by operatic music: Psychophysiological effects of music, plot, and acting. Brain and<br />

Cognition (2011), doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2011.01.012


6 F.R. Baltesß et al. / Brain and Cognition xxx (2011) xxx–xxx<br />

decreased IBI (F[4, 32] = 2.98, p = 0.05, g 2 p<br />

= 0.08), and SCL<br />

(F[4, 32] = 3.2, p = 0.04, g 2 p<br />

= 0.09) in comparison to music listening.<br />

3.4. Experienced chills<br />

The repeated exposure of the independent control sample to<br />

music had no significant effect on self-reported chills (p = 0.3).<br />

There were no differences between the frequency of chills in the<br />

control and main experiments, respectively.<br />

A Friedman non-parametric test compared between the three<br />

experimental conditions in the main experiment and indicated<br />

that the exposure to the acting performance significantly increased<br />

the number of reported chills (v 2 = 8.92, p = 0.01) in comparison to<br />

learning the plot and music listening.<br />

3.5. Relationships between music-induced affect, chills, and<br />

physiological responses<br />

Fig. 2. Changes in GEMS scores induced by music listening (1), learning the plot (2),<br />

and watching the acting performance (3).<br />

Supplementary Fig. 2). We also compared the pattern of GEMS<br />

scores between the first conditions of the main and control experiments.<br />

There was only one significant difference on tenderness<br />

(t[45] = 2.25, p = 0.02), with higher scores in the music listening<br />

condition of the main experiment.<br />

By comparing between the three experimental condition, we<br />

found that learning the plot and watching the acting performance<br />

had significant effects on distinct music-induced emotions (see<br />

Fig. 2). On the one hand, learning the plot reduced the scores of<br />

peacefulness (F[4, 32] = 7.84, p = 0.0009, g 2 p<br />

= 0.23) and joyful activation<br />

(F[4, 32] = 5.85, p = 0.004, g 2 p<br />

= 0.17), and increased sadness<br />

(F[4, 32] = 10.98, p = 0.0001, g 2 p<br />

= 0.32). On the other hand, watching<br />

the acting performance increased the scores of wonder<br />

(F[4, 32] = 8.13, p = 0.0007, g 2 p<br />

= 0.23) and transcendence<br />

(F[4, 32] = 4.02, p = 0.02, g 2 p<br />

= 0.11). Neither the main effect of sex,<br />

nor the interaction of sex musical experience on specific emotions<br />

were statistically significant.<br />

3.3. Physiological responses<br />

The analyses of the data from the supplementary control sample<br />

indicated that the repeated exposure to music had no significant<br />

effects on any of the physiological measures (p > 0.39 for all)<br />

(see Supplementary Fig. 3). However, a couple of physiological<br />

measures were significantly different between the first conditions<br />

of the main and control experiments: IBI (t[45] = 4.77, p < 0.0001)<br />

and RR (t[45] = 2.09, p = 0.04), with lower values in the first condition<br />

of the control experiment.<br />

There were significant main effects of musical experience on<br />

physiological responses. In comparison to baseline measures, music<br />

listening (i.e., the first condition) significantly decreased RR<br />

(F[4, 32] = 9.12, p = 0.005, g 2 p<br />

= 0.29), IBI (F[4, 32] = 3.11, p = 0.02,<br />

g 2 p = 0.09), and SCL (F[4, 32] = 29.76, p < 0.0001, g2 p<br />

= 0.75). In the<br />

following experimental conditions, both learning the plot, and<br />

watching the acting performance specifically influenced physiological<br />

measures (Fig. 3). On the one hand, learning the plot significantly<br />

decreased RSA (F[4, 32] = 3.05, p = 0.05, g 2 p<br />

= 0.08) and<br />

increased LF-HRV (F[4, 32] = 3.49, p = 0.03, g 2 p<br />

= 0.09) and LF/HF<br />

(F[4, 32] = 3.77, p = 0.02, g 2 p<br />

= 0.1) in comparison to music listening.<br />

On the other hand, watching the acting performance significantly<br />

We analyzed the correlations between emotions, chills, and<br />

physiological responses within each musical experience condition.<br />

The following paragraph reports the main patterns of correlations<br />

for which we had a priori hypotheses (for detailed results, see<br />

Tables 1–3). These analyses indicated that LF-HRV positively, and<br />

RSA negatively correlated with emotional arousal after learning<br />

the plot. In the same condition, the frequency of chills also correlated<br />

with arousal. In contrast, RR positively correlated with emotional<br />

valence (i.e., increased RR for positive valence) during music<br />

listening.<br />

The analyses of music-induced emotions showed that LF-HRV<br />

positively, and RSA negatively correlated with the level of wonder,<br />

power, and joyful activation after learning the plot. Also, LF-HRV<br />

positively and RSA negatively correlated with the frequency of<br />

chills both after learning the plot, and while watching the acting<br />

performance. Chills consistently correlated positively with the levels<br />

of wonder and transcendence in all three musical experience<br />

conditions. We also checked if this correlation was replicated in<br />

the control experiment and we confirmed that chills correlated significantly<br />

with wonder (r = 0.65, p = 0.05) and marginally with<br />

transcendence (r = 0.6, p = 0.08). Another consistent pattern of positive<br />

correlations was that between RR, wonder (during all three<br />

musical experience conditions), and transcendence (during music<br />

listening, and watching the acting performance).<br />

3.6. Previous mood and music-induced affect<br />

PA and NA significantly correlated (r = 0.45, p < 0.01), but the<br />

low correlation allowed us to use both as predictors (i.e., negligible<br />

multicollinearity). Our hypotheses were that NA would positively<br />

predict unpleasant emotions measured by GEMS (i.e., nostalgia,<br />

sadness, tension), and negatively predict pleasant emotions (i.e.,<br />

wonder, transcendence, power, tenderness, peacefulness, joyful<br />

activation). We also expected that PA would negatively predict<br />

unpleasant emotions and positively predict pleasant emotions. In<br />

addition, based on the work of Panksepp (1995), we also hypothesized<br />

that NA would negatively predict chills and RSA. On the<br />

assumption that only the first condition (i.e., music listening)<br />

would be directly affected by previous mood, regression analyses<br />

were run on music-induced emotions and chills recorded during<br />

the first condition. The results indicated that power (R = 0.53,<br />

p = 0.0009, g 2 p<br />

= 0.28) and joyful activation (R = 0.45, p = 0.05,<br />

g 2 p<br />

= 0.21) were negatively predicted by NA. In contrast, PA positively<br />

predicted power (R = 0.51, p < 0.001, g 2 p<br />

= 0.26) and joyful<br />

activation (R = 0.38, p = 0.02, g 2 p = 0.15).<br />

Please cite this article in press as: Baltesß, F. R., et al. Emotions induced by operatic music: Psychophysiological effects of music, plot, and acting. Brain and<br />

Cognition (2011), doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2011.01.012


F.R. Baltesß et al. / Brain and Cognition xxx (2011) xxx–xxx 7<br />

Fig. 3. Changes in interbeat intervals (IBI), heart rate (HR), power in the very low frequency (VLF), and low frequency (LF) bands of heart rate variability, respiratory sinus<br />

arrhythmia (RSA), sympathovagal balance (LF/HF), skin conductance level (SCL), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and respiratory rate (RR)<br />

induced by music listening (1), learning the plot (2), and watching the acting performance (3).<br />

4. Discussion<br />

The results of this study confirmed that music listening, learning<br />

the plot, and watching the acting performance had specific effects<br />

on emotional responses measured at the subjective and<br />

physiological levels.<br />

4.1. Effects of music, plot and acting<br />

In comparison to expected mean scores, music listening increased,<br />

as one would expect, emotional arousal and valence. In<br />

addition, music listening decreased RR, IBI and SCL, in comparison<br />

to baseline physiology. These results seem to extend previous<br />

observations that sad music is associated with decreased SCL,<br />

and sadness induced by music is well discriminated by respiratory<br />

changes (Krumhansl, 1997; Nyklícek et al., 1997). Moreover, our<br />

observation of decreased SCL associated with this music excerpt<br />

is also in line with studies that induced sadness by directed facial<br />

action tasks (Ekman et al., 1983; Levenson, 1992).<br />

It may seem that the pattern of reduced RR and SCL, and increased<br />

HR (i.e., decreased IBI) in the music listening condition is<br />

contradictory. Early observations indicated that the minor tonalities<br />

of music increased HR (Hyde & Scalapino, 1918), whereas<br />

the tempo of music influenced RR (Diserens, 1920). Bernardi and<br />

colleagues (2009) have recently reported that music crescendos<br />

or emphases (e.g., in Nessun dorma from Puccini’s Turandot) induced<br />

skin vasoconstriction along with increases in blood pressures<br />

and HR. There was also increased breath depth during<br />

music crescendos, but these modulations of respiratory power<br />

were independent of cardiovascular modulations. The present<br />

study also shows that music listening independently modulated<br />

RR and HR, and the former correlated with negative valence, wonder<br />

and transcendence. Also in line with the present results, Nakahara,<br />

Furuya, Francis, & Kinoshita, (2010) found that playing Bach’s<br />

No. 1 Prelude with emotional expression increased HR and decreased<br />

RR in pianists, in comparison to playing the same piece<br />

without emotional expression. Therefore, these studies suggest<br />

that music-induced emotions can independently modulate cardiovascular<br />

and respiratory activities, and this pattern of physiological<br />

changes may contribute to the receptiveness or arousal to music<br />

(Bernardi et al., 2009; the present study) and the capacity of<br />

performers to incorporate expressiveness in their performance<br />

(Nakahara, Furuya, Francis, & Kinoshita, 2010).<br />

Our control analyses on the data from an independent sample<br />

indicated that re-listening to the musical excerpt for three times<br />

did not increase emotional arousal and valence, or induced additional<br />

physiological changes by itself. Whereas there were no differences<br />

between the conditions of the control experiment,<br />

which argued that repeated music listening alone did not affected<br />

the subjective and physiological measurements, the relevance of<br />

the physiological measurements from the control experiment is<br />

limited. There were differences in IBI and RR between the sample<br />

used in the main and control experiments, respectively. This was<br />

probably due to the reduced sample size in the control experiment<br />

(N = 9, in comparison to N = 37 in the main experiment). Overall,<br />

the control data supported the view that the changes observed in<br />

the main experiment were not due to repeated music listening<br />

alone, although this inference should be taken with caution in regard<br />

to some of the physiological results. Replicating the control<br />

findings with a sample size that is similar to that of the main<br />

experiment would be necessary in order to unequivocally confirm<br />

that the repeated music listening alone does not change physiological<br />

activity.<br />

Learning the plot before listening to the musical excerpt the<br />

second time (in the main experiment) induced a pattern of emotional<br />

changes that included reduced peacefulness, joyful activation,<br />

and increased sadness. At the physiological level, learning<br />

the plot decreased RSA and increased LF-HRV. The change in RSA<br />

reflects vagal suppression that has been associated with negative<br />

emotional states and traits, such as anxiety and depression (Bleil,<br />

Gianaros, Jennings, Flory, & Manuck, 2008; Miu et al., 2009). The<br />

summary of the plot that the participants read before they<br />

Please cite this article in press as: Baltesß, F. R., et al. Emotions induced by operatic music: Psychophysiological effects of music, plot, and acting. Brain and<br />

Cognition (2011), doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2011.01.012


8 F.R. Baltesß et al. / Brain and Cognition xxx (2011) xxx–xxx<br />

Table 1<br />

Correlations between physiological responses, chills, and affect during music listening.<br />

Geneva Emotional Music Scale Chills<br />

Self-Assessment<br />

Manikin<br />

Sadness Tension<br />

Arousal Valence Wonder Transcendence Power Tenderness Nostalgia Peacefulness Joyful<br />

activation<br />

Systolic blood pressure (SBP) 0.23 0.12 0.23 0.36 * 0.34 * 0.13 0.29 0.03 0.17 0.3 0.07 0.09<br />

Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) 0.06 0.17 0.13 0.16 0.15 0.06 0.02 0.11 0.15 0.15 0.03 0.11<br />

Skin conductance level (SCL) 0.08 0.12 0.05 0.15 0.14 0.12 0.14 0.01 0.02 0.15 0.07 0.11<br />

Respiratory rate (RR) 0.01 0.4 * 0.35 * 0.35 * 0.7 0.23 0.32 0.08 0.12 0.04 0.00 0.27<br />

Cardiac interbeat intervals (IBI) 0.05 0.11 0.17 0.01 0.21 0.01 0.15 0.01 0.02 0.1 0.02 0.21<br />

Heart rate (HR) 0.04 0.08 0.14 0.01 0.18 0.03 0.12 0.02 0.04 0.11 0.06 0.18<br />

Power in the very low frequency of heart rate variability (VLF-HRV) 0.21 0.31 0.07 0.02 0.6 0.36 * 0.11 0.45 ** 0.07 0.1 0.08 0.03<br />

Power in the low frequency of heart rate variability (LF-HRV) 0.1 0.05 0.003 0.09 0.7 0.03 0.29 0.13 0.21 0.11 0.09 0.04<br />

Respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA or HF-HRV) 0.02 0.01 0.07 0.05 0.01 0.07 0.27 0.16 0.25 0.13 0.04 0.15<br />

Ratio between low and high frequency powers of heart rate variability 0.15 0.15 0.19 0.07 0.16 0.09 0.22 0.15 0.1 0.00 0.04 0.05<br />

(LF/HF)<br />

Chills 0.22 0.08 0.44 ** 0.46 ** 0.11 0.00 0.19 0.12 0.12 0.1 0.26<br />

p 6 0.05.<br />

p 6 0.01.<br />

*<br />

**<br />

re-listened to the musical excerpt described negative emotional<br />

events (e.g., Scarpia tortures Cavaradossi and harasses Tosca; see<br />

Supplementary materials). Therefore, we argue that the sadness induced<br />

by learning the plot triggered vagal suppression that was<br />

neither explained by concomitant respiratory changes (i.e., RR<br />

was controlled for in the analyses of RSA), nor by re-listening to<br />

the musical excerpt by itself. The increase in LF-HRV suggests that<br />

learning the plot also facilitated sympathetic activity. However, LF<br />

probably reflects a complex interplay between sympathetic and<br />

vagal influences on the heart (Eckberg, 1997; Miu et al., 2009), so<br />

the effect of learning the plot on sympathetic activity should be taken<br />

with caution. Overall, learning the plot significantly influenced<br />

music-induced emotions and changed sympathovagal balance in<br />

the direction of greater preparedness for action.<br />

Watching the acting performance increased emotional arousal<br />

and valence (SAM) compared to the first two experimental conditions.<br />

Furthermore, it increased wonder and transcendence<br />

(GEMS). Notably, wonder and transcendence are emotions that<br />

are specifically induced by music (Zentner et al., 2008). In comparison<br />

to music listening and learning the plot, watching the acting<br />

performance added social-emotional and visuospatial cues to the<br />

musical experience: facial expressions, gestures and postures,<br />

translated lines, and scenery. These factors probably contributed<br />

to the semantic processing of music and vocal expressions, and<br />

we argue that this experimental condition best approximated the<br />

full musical experience of listeners attending a live opera performance.<br />

Watching the acting performance decreased IBI and SCL<br />

in comparison to music listening. Previous studies reported that<br />

music-induced sadness ratings correlated positively with IBI and<br />

negatively with SCL (Krumhansl, 1997; Nyklícek et al., 1997). In<br />

addition, watching the acting performance was also related to significantly<br />

more music-induced chills. Another recent study showed<br />

that music-induced chills correlated with increased SCL and HR<br />

(Guhn, Hamm, & Zentner, 2007). The apparent divergence between<br />

these previous results and the present findings of increased wonder<br />

and transcendence associated with decreased IBI and SCL,<br />

and increased music-induced chills may be explained by differences<br />

in experimental design and measures. First, previous studies<br />

used short excerpts from classical orchestral music, whereas we focused<br />

on opera. Second, the previous studies investigated music<br />

listening alone, whereas our observations are based on a condition<br />

that involved music listening while watching the acting performance.<br />

Third, their conclusions are based on comparisons between<br />

music expressing negative and positive emotions, identified using<br />

basic emotions questionnaires. In the present experiment, watching<br />

the acting performance induced wonder and transcendence<br />

measured using GEMS. Overall, our results show for the first time<br />

that watching the acting performance contributes to music-induced<br />

wonder and transcendence that are associated with decreased<br />

IBI and SCL, and increased chills.<br />

In summary, both music listening (compared to baseline), and<br />

watching the acting performance (compared to music listening)<br />

decreased IBI and SCL. As shown in Fig. 3, IBI followed the same<br />

decreasing trend, whereas SCL remained at the same level after<br />

learning the plot compared to music listening. This means that<br />

learning the plot did not significantly influence these physiological<br />

variables, but they nonetheless remained at the level induced by<br />

music listening (i.e., they did not return to baseline). Therefore,<br />

music listening decreased RR, IBI, and SCL, learning the plot had<br />

no effect on these measures, and watching the acting performance<br />

significantly decreased IBI and SCL again. This indicates that IBI and<br />

SCL are the main physiological variables that are influenced by music<br />

listening and watching the acting performance. The only variables<br />

that were specifically influenced by learning the plot were<br />

RSA and LF-HRV, which indicates that they are sensitive to the<br />

addition of meaning in this context.<br />

Please cite this article in press as: Baltesß, F. R., et al. Emotions induced by operatic music: Psychophysiological effects of music, plot, and acting. Brain and<br />

Cognition (2011), doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2011.01.012


F.R. Baltesß et al. / Brain and Cognition xxx (2011) xxx–xxx 9<br />

4.2. Coherence between subjective and physiological changes<br />

Table 2<br />

Correlations between physiological responses, chills, and affect during music listening after learning the plot.<br />

Geneva Emotional Music Scale Chills<br />

Self-Assessment<br />

Manikin<br />

Sadness Tension<br />

Arousal Valence Wonder Transcendence Power Tenderness Nostalgia Peacefulness Joyful<br />

activation<br />

Systolic blood pressure (SBP) 0.12 0.1 0.23 0.09 0.24 0.08 0.05 0.01 0.05 0.04 0.01 0.1<br />

Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) 0.02 0.15 0.00 0.16 0.13 0.39 ** 0.23 0.19 0.11 0.00 0.08 0.05<br />

Skin conductance level (SCL) 0.02 0.07 0.13 0.09 0.06 0.04 0.18 0.06 0.08 0.02 0.47 ** 0.18<br />

Respiratory rate (RR) 0.08 0.29 0.33 * 0.42 0.26 0.13 0.1 0.04 0.32 * 0.01 0.01 0.45 **<br />

Cardiac interbeat intervals (IBI) 0.09 0.21 0.27 0.17 0.34 * 0.11 0.16 0.04 0.33 * 0.1 0.18 0.09<br />

Heart rate (HR) 0.05 0.16 0.25 0.13 0.35 * 0.05 0.13 0.02 0.29 0.09 0.22 0.07<br />

Power in the very low frequency of heart rate variability (VLF-HRV) 0.02 0.23 0.08 0.07 0.02 0.07 0.2 0.15 0.16 0.02 0.13 0.13<br />

Power in the low frequency of heart rate variability (LF-HRV) 0.36 * 0.02 0.56 ** 0.56 ** 0.46 ** 0.39 * 0.43 ** 0.01 0.47 ** 0.44 ** 0.29 0.35 *<br />

Respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA or HF-HRV) 0.34 * 0.01 0.56 ** 0.56 ** 0.46 ** 0.41 ** 0.43 ** 0.00 0.47 ** 0.42 ** 0.29 0.35 *<br />

0.16 0.15 0.09 0.14 0.17 0.08 0.07 0.03 0.11 0.00 0.07 0.31<br />

Ratio between low and high frequency powers of heart rate variability<br />

(LF/HF)<br />

Chills 0.34 * 0.03 0.36 * 0.39 * 0.28 0.02 0.27 0.1 0.4 * 0.12 0.36 *<br />

p 6 0.05.<br />

p 6 0.01.<br />

*<br />

**<br />

There has been an active emotivist vs. cognitivist debate between<br />

scholars who argue that music listeners really experience<br />

emotions, or only identify emotions that music expresses (Kivy,<br />

1990; Scherer & Zentner, 2001). This study integrated subjective<br />

and physiological measures of emotional responses, thus adding<br />

to the developing literature on the psychophysiology of music. In<br />

this line, a novel and important contribution of the present study<br />

is that we correlated music-induced emotions measured with a domain-specific<br />

instrument (i.e., GEMS), with an extensive array of<br />

emotion-related physiological changes. For instance, we found that<br />

music-induced wonder positively correlated with RR and chills<br />

across conditions. Moreover, by comparing the correlations of subjective<br />

and physiological changes between the three experimental<br />

conditions, one would observe that the psychophysiological coherence<br />

increases the most after learning the plot. This might suggest<br />

that the addition of meaning may be more closely related to the<br />

coherence between subjective and physiological changes induced<br />

by music, than the provision of additional sensory information<br />

(e.g., watching the acting performance).<br />

4.3. Affective mood and sex<br />

The present findings that affective mood predicted emotions induced<br />

by music listening (e.g., power, joyful activation) suggests<br />

that future studies of music-induced emotions should control for<br />

this potential confound. Specifically, NA negatively predicted, and<br />

PA positively predicted power and joyful activation induced by<br />

music listening. This argues for the role of affective mood in the<br />

genesis of music-induced emotions, which is also in line with other<br />

studies (see Kreutz, Ott, Teichmann, Osawa, & Vaitl, 2008). In a recent<br />

field study (F.R. Baltes, M. Miclea, & A.C. Miu, unpublished<br />

observations), we have confirmed and extended the relationship<br />

between the affective mood that the participants reported before<br />

the beginning of a live opera performance, and the music-induced<br />

sadness and transcendence (GEMS). This indicates that the influence<br />

of affective mood is not limited to wonder and transcendence.<br />

However, the specificity of this association in relation to the musical<br />

stimuli, and the physical setting (i.e., laboratory vs. field studies)<br />

might be investigated by future studies.<br />

We also controlled for sex differences in the present analyses. A<br />

previous study showed that in comparison to men, women rated<br />

the chill-producing songs as being sadder (Panksepp, 1995). Another<br />

study reported that women showed elevated SCL to heavy<br />

metal compared to Renaissance music (Nater et al., 2006). In light<br />

of these results, the present study tested the effects of sex, and the<br />

interaction of sex and musical experience. We expected that after<br />

learning the plot, and especially during watching the acting performance,<br />

women would be more reactive due to increased emotional<br />

empathy with the female character in the musical excerpt. However,<br />

we found no significant main effect, or interaction of sex with<br />

musical experience, on subjective or physiological responses.<br />

4.4. Potential limitations and implications<br />

One potential limit is that the mere repeated exposure may<br />

have influenced the present pattern of results. However, this<br />

possibility was controlled by measuring the same subjective and<br />

physiological responses while an independent control sample<br />

re-listened to the same musical excerpt for three times. The results<br />

from this sample indicated that the emotional arousal and valence,<br />

the music-induced emotions, or the physiological measures did not<br />

change with mere re-listening. This is also in line with the studies<br />

of Grewe et al. (2007a, 2007b). However, we acknowledge that a<br />

real limitation of the present study comes from the small size of<br />

Please cite this article in press as: Baltesß, F. R., et al. Emotions induced by operatic music: Psychophysiological effects of music, plot, and acting. Brain and<br />

Cognition (2011), doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2011.01.012


10 F.R. Baltesß et al. / Brain and Cognition xxx (2011) xxx–xxx<br />

Table 3<br />

Correlations between physiological responses, chills, and affect during music listening while watching the acting performance.<br />

Geneva Emotional Music Scale Chills<br />

Self-Assessment<br />

Manikin<br />

Sadness Tension<br />

Arousal Valence Wonder Transcendence Power Tenderness Nostalgia Peacefulness Joyful<br />

activation<br />

Systolic blood pressure (SBP) 0.17 0.18 0.15 0.39 * 0.09 0.2 0.21 0.1 0.09 0.22 0.39 ** 0.02<br />

Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) 0.13 0.23 0.25 0.32 0.1 0.12 0.04 0.01 0.13 0.1 0.21 0.017<br />

Skin conductance level (SCL) 0.00 0.16 0.04 0.05 0.09 0.01 0.1 0.05 0.02 0.16 0.1 0.09<br />

Respiratory rate (RR) 0.32 0.2 0.39 ** 0.49 ** 0.34 * 0.2 0.08 0.01 0.27 0.28 0.22 0.53 **<br />

Cardiac interbeat intervals (IBI) 0.17 0.05 0.18 0.25 0.01 0.03 0.01 0.12 0.03 0.21 0.07 0.04<br />

Heart rate (HR) 0.19 0.00 0.17 0.25 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.16 0.00 0.17 0.02 0.00<br />

Power in the very low frequency of heart rate variability (VLF-HRV) 0.02 0.00 0.13 0.04 0.12 0.15 0.12 0.25 0.2 0.00 0.13 0.14<br />

Power in the low frequency of heart rate variability (LF-HRV) 0.08 0.06 0.16 0.1 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.11 0.03 0.00 0.04 0.36 *<br />

Respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA or HF-HRV) 0.02 0.12 0.16 0.1 0.03 0.02 0.11 0.06 0.02 0.12 0.05 0.38 *<br />

0.05 0.03 0.16 0.22 0.19 0.08 0.07 0.03 0.15 0.06 0.27 0.29<br />

Ratio between low and high frequency powers of heart rate variability<br />

(LF/HF)<br />

Chills 0.2 0.12 0.36 * 0.34 * 0.27 0.12 0.22 0.12 0.28 0.24 0.023<br />

p 6 0.05.<br />

p 6 0.01.<br />

*<br />

**<br />

the control sample in comparison to the sample from the main<br />

experiment.<br />

In light of the previous literature, musical expertise and (not)<br />

understanding the original language performance are also unlikely<br />

to have confounded our results. For instance, Bigand et al. (2005)<br />

showed that the classification of musical excerpts according to<br />

the emotional content did not differ between music graduates<br />

and nonmusicians. Another study found that emotional responses<br />

are not affected by song translation of non-native original language<br />

performance (Chiaschi, 2007), such as we did in our third experimental<br />

condition. It is also unlikely that listening to music with<br />

eyes open influenced music-induced emotions in the present study<br />

(Kallinen, 2004). However, future studies might control for personality<br />

variables (e.g., absorption) that are known to affect emotional<br />

arousal induced by music (Kreutz et al., 2008).<br />

These results have theoretical and methodological implications.<br />

First, they contribute to the literature supporting the emotivist position<br />

in the psychology of music. Second, they also add evidence in<br />

favor of the physiological differentiation of emotions. Third, considering<br />

that psychophysiological measures tended to correlate<br />

more highly with GEMS scores, and wonder and transcendence<br />

played a particularly prominent role, the present results emphasize<br />

the utility of domain-specific instruments to assess music-induced<br />

emotions. Fourth, many previous studies have paid a high price for<br />

experimental control, by using sound clips lasting a few seconds<br />

and crude measures of emotion (Peretz et al., 2001; Vieillard<br />

et al., 2008). Although these studies contributed to the understanding<br />

of the minimal conditions that are necessary to express an<br />

emotional meaning, it remains often unclear whether findings<br />

from such studies have any bearing on the experience of music<br />

in real life. Consequently, we chose to use a 19 min excerpt from<br />

Tosca, edited to contain a coherent plot, in order to realistically<br />

simulate the real life conditions in which opera induces emotions.<br />

The rich and complex pattern of psychophysiological results in the<br />

present study underscores the importance of external validity in<br />

laboratory studies of music-induced emotions.<br />

Each experimental condition in the present study manipulated<br />

an additional variable in relation to the previous conditions (i.e.,<br />

the plot for the second condition, and the visual context for the<br />

third condition). The rationale behind this type of within-subject<br />

design is that any change that develops in one condition relative<br />

to the previous one is determined by the additional variable that<br />

was manipulated in that condition. However, it is possible that<br />

rather than being specifically induced by each new variable that<br />

was manipulated in a certain experimental condition, the changes<br />

could be due to simply increasing the sensory and semantic complexity<br />

of the musical experience. For instance, the visual context<br />

that was added in the third experimental condition might have<br />

clarified the meaning of the music, or allowed increased depth of<br />

processing in relation to the first two conditions. Other studies<br />

have used similar approaches by juxtaposing music and images,<br />

or lyrics and music, and claimed that emotional changes were specifically<br />

induced by the variable that differed between conditions<br />

(e.g., Ali & Peynircioglu, 2006).<br />

One may wonder whether this pattern of findings might generalize<br />

to all opera, or is unique to this style of operatic music performance<br />

(i.e., pertaining to verismo), composer, composition, excerpt,<br />

or interpretation. Scherer and Zentner (2001) have emphasized<br />

that music-induced emotions depend on several factors, such as<br />

structural features of music (i.e., pitch, melody, tempo, rhythm,<br />

harmony), performance features (e.g., physical appearance, expression,<br />

reputation, technical and interpretative skills of the performer),<br />

listener features (e.g., musical expertise, personality,<br />

affective mood), and contextual features (e.g., location of the<br />

performance, social framing of the event). The present study<br />

investigated the influence of affective mood, and controlled for<br />

Please cite this article in press as: Baltesß, F. R., et al. Emotions induced by operatic music: Psychophysiological effects of music, plot, and acting. Brain and<br />

Cognition (2011), doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2011.01.012


F.R. Baltesß et al. / Brain and Cognition xxx (2011) xxx–xxx 11<br />

important listener features (i.e., musical expertise, familiarity with<br />

the selected musical piece, preference for classic or operatic music).<br />

In addition, all the participants listened to the music in the<br />

same physical setting (i.e., our laboratory). This argues for the generality<br />

of our findings. It was beyond the purpose of this study to<br />

investigate the influence of musical structure, and performance<br />

features. It is likely that the stellar performance of Maria Callas<br />

and Tito Gobbi in this Tosca performance increased the effectiveness<br />

of this excerpt in inducing emotions. However, we speculate<br />

that the pattern of emotions reported here would not have been<br />

different had we used another interpretation of this opera by artists<br />

that are vocally and dramatically comparable (or at least<br />

close) to Maria Callas and Tito Gobbi. Future studies might investigate<br />

whether these findings can be replicated with excerpts from<br />

other operas.<br />

4.5. Conclusion<br />

In conclusion, this study found that music listening, learning the<br />

plot, and watching the acting performance had specific effects on<br />

music-induced emotions and their physiological correlates. Opera<br />

poses enormous challenges to research due to the multitude of<br />

musical and dramatic means by which it induces emotions.<br />

Although the present study only scratched the surface, it opens<br />

new perspectives for future studies on the mechanisms of musicinduced<br />

emotions in opera.<br />

Acknowledgments<br />

We are grateful to Dr. Laurel J. Trainor and two anonymous<br />

reviewers for important suggestions that helped us in improving<br />

the present article, and Dr. Marcel Zentner for permission to use<br />

the Geneva Emotional Music Scale (GEMS-45) in the study. We also<br />

thank Silviu Matu for help with data collection. This research was<br />

supported by the 2010 Arnold Bentley Award from the Society for<br />

Education, Music, and Psychology (SEMPRE) to R.F.B. and A.C.M.,<br />

and grant 411/2010 from the National University Research Council<br />

to A.C.M.<br />

Appendix A. Supplementary material<br />

Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in<br />

the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2011.01.012.<br />

References<br />

Ali, S. O., & Peynircioglu, Z. F. (2006). Songs and emotions: Are lyrics and melodies<br />

equal partners? Psychology of Music, 34, 511–534.<br />

Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Damasio, A. R., & Lee, G. P. (1999). Different contributions<br />

of the human amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex to decision-making.<br />

Journal of Neuroscience, 19(13), 5473–5481.<br />

Bernardi, L., Porta, C., Casucci, G., Balsamo, R., Bernardi, N. F., Fogari, R., et al. (2009).<br />

Dynamic interactions between musical, cardiovascular, and cerebral rhythms in<br />

humans. Circulation, 119(25), 3171–3180.<br />

Bezdek, M. A., & Gerrig, R. J. (2008). Musical emotions in the context of narrative<br />

film. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31, 578.<br />

Bharucha, J. J., Curtis, M., & Paroo, K. (2006). Varieties of musical experience.<br />

Cognition, 100(1), 131–172.<br />

Bigand, E., Vieillard, S., Madurell, F., Marozeau, J., & Dacquet, A. (2005).<br />

Multidimensional scaling of emotional responses to music: The effect of<br />

musical expertise and of the duration of the excerpts. Cognition and Emotion, 19,<br />

1113–1139.<br />

Bleil, M. E., Gianaros, P. J., Jennings, J. R., Flory, J. D., & Manuck, S. B. (2008). Trait<br />

negative affect: Toward an integrated model of understanding psychological<br />

risk for impairment in cardiac autonomic function. Psychosomatic Medicine,<br />

70(3), 328–337.<br />

Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1994). Measuring emotion: The self-assessment<br />

manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and<br />

Experimental Psychiatry, 25(1), 49–59.<br />

Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (2000). Affective reactions to acoustic stimuli.<br />

Psychophysiology, 37(2), 204–215.<br />

Cacioppo, J. T., Berntsen, G. B., Klein, D. J., & Poehlmann, K. M. (1997).<br />

Psychophysiology of emotion across the life span. Annual Review of<br />

Gerontology & Geriatrics, 17, 27–74.<br />

Chiaschi, M. (2007). The effect of song translation vs. non-native original language<br />

performance in Japanese on emotional response of Japanese participants. M.A.<br />

thesis, The Florida State University. .<br />

Codispoti, M., Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (2001). Affective reactions to briefly<br />

presented pictures. Psychophysiology, 38(3), 474–478.<br />

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.).<br />

Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.<br />

de Gelder, B., Bocker, K. B., Tuomainen, J., Hensen, M., & Vroomen, J. (1999).<br />

The combined perception of emotion from voice and face: Early interaction<br />

revealed by human electric brain responses. Neuroscience Letters, 260(2),<br />

133–136.<br />

DeNora, T. (1999). Music as a technology of the self. Poetics, 27, 31–36.<br />

Diserens, C. M. (1920). Reaction to musical stimuli. Psychological Bulletin, 20,<br />

173–199.<br />

Eckberg, D. L. (1997). Sympathovagal balance: A critical appraisal. Circulation, 96(9),<br />

3224–3232.<br />

Ekman, P., Levenson, R. W., & Friesen, W. V. (1983). Autonomic nervous system<br />

activity distinguishes among emotions. Science, 221(4616), 1208–1210.<br />

Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G⁄Power 3: Flexible statistical<br />

power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.<br />

Behavior Research Methods, 39(2).<br />

Frazier, T. W., Strauss, M. E., & Steinhauer, S. R. (2004). Respiratory sinus arrhythmia<br />

as an index of emotional response in young adults. Psychophysiology, 41(1),<br />

75–83.<br />

Grewe, O., Nagel, F., Kopiez, R., & Altenmuller, E. (2007a). Emotions over time:<br />

Synchronicity and development of subjective, physiological, and facial affective<br />

reactions to music. Emotion, 7(4), 774–788.<br />

Grewe, O., Nagel, F., Kopiez, R., & Altenmuller, E. (2007b). Listening to music as a recreative<br />

process: Physiological, psychological, and psychoacoustical correlates<br />

of chills and strong emotions. Music Perception, 24, 297–314.<br />

Guhn, M., Hamm, A., & Zentner, M. (2007). Physiological and musico-acoustic<br />

correlates of the chill response. Music Perception, 24(5), 473–483.<br />

Hietanen, J. K., Surakka, V., & Linnankoski, I. (1998). Facial electromyographic<br />

responses to vocal affect expressions. Psychophysiology, 35(5), 530–536.<br />

Huck, W. (1984). Tosca: Four callas toscas. The Opera Quarterly, 2(3), 175–178.<br />

Hyde, I. H., & Scalapino, W. (1918). The influence of music upon electrocardiograms<br />

and blood pressure. American Journal of Physiology, 46, 35–38.<br />

Juslin, P. N., Liljestrom, S., Vastfjall, D., Barradas, G., & Silva, A. (2008). An experience<br />

sampling study of emotional reactions to music: Listener, music, and situation.<br />

Emotion, 8(5), 668–683.<br />

Juslin, P. N., & Vastfjall, D. (2008). Emotional responses to music: The need to<br />

consider underlying mechanisms. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31(5), 559–575<br />

(discussion 575-621).<br />

Kallinen, K. (2004). Emotion related psychophysiological responses to listening to music<br />

with eyes-open versus eyes-closed: Electrodermal (EDA), electrocardial (ECG), and<br />

electromyographic (EMG) measures. Paper presented at the International<br />

Conference on Music Perception & Cognition.<br />

Khalfa, S., Peretz, I., Blondin, J.-P., & Manon, R. (2002). Event-related skin<br />

conductance responses to musical emotions in humans. Neuroscience Letters,<br />

328(2), 145–149.<br />

Kingwell, B. A., Thompson, J. M., Kaye, D. M., McPherson, G. A., Jennings, G. L., &<br />

Esler, M. D. (1994). Heart rate spectral analysis, cardiac norepinephrine<br />

spillover, and muscle sympathetic nerve activity during human sympathetic<br />

nervous activation and failure. Circulation, 90(1), 234–240.<br />

Kivy, P. (1990). Music alone: Philosophical reflections on the purely musical experience.<br />

Cornell University Press.<br />

Koelsch, S. (2005). Investigating emotion with music: Neuroscientific approaches.<br />

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1060, 412–418.<br />

Kreibig, S. D., Wilhelm, F. H., Roth, W. T., & Gross, J. J. (2007). Cardiovascular,<br />

electrodermal, and respiratory response patterns to fear- and sadness-inducing<br />

films. Psychophysiology, 44(5), 787–806.<br />

Kreutz, G., Ott, U., Teichmann, D., Osawa, O., & Vaitl, D. (2008). Using music to<br />

induce emotions: Influences of musical preference and absorption. Psychology of<br />

Music, 36(1), 101–126.<br />

Krumhansl, C. L. (1997). An exploratory study of musical emotions and<br />

psychophysiology. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51(4),<br />

336–353.<br />

Levenson, R. W. (1992). Autonomic nervous system differences among emotions.<br />

Psychological Science, 3, 23–27.<br />

Lundqvist, L. O., Carlsson, F., & Juslin, P. N. (2009). Emotional responses to music:<br />

Experience, expression, and physiology. Psychology of Music, 37, 61–90.<br />

Lundqvist, L. O., & Dimberg, U. (1995). Facial expressions are contagious. Journal of<br />

Psychophysiology, 9(3), 203–211.<br />

Miu, A. C., Heilman, R. M., & Houser, D. (2008). Anxiety impairs decision-making:<br />

Psychophysiological evidence from an Iowa Gambling Task. Biological<br />

Psychology, 77(3), 353–358.<br />

Miu, A. C., Heilman, R. M., & Miclea, M. (2009). Reduced heart rate variability and<br />

vagal tone in anxiety: Trait versus state, and the effects of autogenic training.<br />

Autonomic Neuroscience, 145(1–2), 99–103.<br />

Nakahara, H., Furuya, S., Francis, P. R., & Kinoshita, H. (2010). Psycho-physiological<br />

responses to expressive piano performance. International Journal of<br />

Psychophysiology, 75(3), 268–276.<br />

Please cite this article in press as: Baltesß, F. R., et al. Emotions induced by operatic music: Psychophysiological effects of music, plot, and acting. Brain and<br />

Cognition (2011), doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2011.01.012


12 F.R. Baltesß et al. / Brain and Cognition xxx (2011) xxx–xxx<br />

Nater, U. M., Abbruzzese, A., Krebs, M., & Ehlert, U. (2006). Sex differences in<br />

emotional and psychophysiological responses to musical stimuli. International<br />

Journal of Psychophysiology, 62(2), 300–308.<br />

Nyklícek, I., Thayer, J. F., & Van Doornen, L. J. P. (1997). Cardiorespiratory<br />

differentiation of musically-induced emotions. Journal of Psychophysiology, 11,<br />

304–321.<br />

Panksepp, J. (1995). The emotional sources of ‘‘chills’’ induced by music. Music<br />

Perception(13), 171–207.<br />

Peretz, I., Blood, A. J., Penhune, V., & Zatorre, R. (2001). Cortical deafness to<br />

dissonance. Brain, 124(Pt 5), 928–940.<br />

Rickard, N. S. (2004). Intense emotional responses to music: A test of the<br />

physiological arousal hypothesis. Psychology of Music, 32, 371–388.<br />

Scherer, K. R. (1995). Expression of emotion in voice and music. Journal of Voice,<br />

9(3), 235–248.<br />

Scherer, K. R., & Zentner, M. R. (2001). Emotional effects of music: Production rules.<br />

In P. N. Juslin & J. A. Sloboda (Eds.), Music and emotion: Theory and research<br />

(pp. 361–392). Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.<br />

Sloboda, J. (1991). Music structure and emotional response: Some empirical<br />

findings. Psychology of Music, 19, 110–120.<br />

Sloboda, J. (1992). Music as a language. In F. Wilson & F. Roehmann (Eds.), Music and<br />

child development (pp. 28–43). MMB Music.<br />

Sloboda, J., & O’Neil, S. A. (2001). Emotions in everyday listening to music. In P. N.<br />

Juslin & J. A. Sloboda (Eds.), Music and emotion: Theory and research. Oxford;<br />

New York: Oxford University Press.<br />

Sloboda, J., O’Neil, S. A., & Ivaldi, A. (2001). Functions of emotions in everyday life:<br />

An exploratory study using the experience sampling method. Musicae Scientiae,<br />

5, 9–32.<br />

Stevens, J. (2002). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (Applied<br />

Multivariate STATS) (4th ed.). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.<br />

Stratton, V. N., & Zalanowski, A. H. (1994). Affective impact of music vs. lyrics.<br />

Psychology of Music, 12(2), 70–83.<br />

Tan, S. L., Spackman, M. P., & Bezdek, M. A. (2007). Viewers’ interpretations of film<br />

characters’ emotions: Effects of presenting film music before or after a character<br />

is shown. Music Perception, 25(2), 135–152.<br />

Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of<br />

Pacing and Electrophysiology (1996). Heart rate variability: Standards of<br />

measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Circulation, 93,<br />

1043–1065.<br />

Vaitl, D., Vehrs, W., & Sternagel, S. (1993). Prompts-leitmotif-emotion: Play it again,<br />

Richard Wagner! In N. Birbaumer & A. Ohman (Eds.), The structure of emotion:<br />

Psychophysiological, cognitive, and clinical aspects (pp. 169–189). Seattle, WA:<br />

Hogrefe & Huber.<br />

Vieillard, S., Peretz, I., Gosselin, N., Khalfa, S., Gagnon, L., & Bouchard, B. (2008).<br />

Happy, sad, scary and peaceful musical excerpts for research on emotions.<br />

Cognition and Emotion, 22(4), 720–752.<br />

Vitouch, O. (2001). When your ear sets the stage: Musical context effects in film<br />

perception. Psychology of Music, 29(1), 70–83.<br />

Watson, D., & Clark, A. C. (1994). The PANAS-X. Manual for the positive and negative<br />

affect schedule – expanded form. The University of Iowa.<br />

Watt, R. J., & Ash, R. L. (1998). A psychological investigation of meaning in music.<br />

Musicae Scientiae, 2, 33–54.<br />

Witvliet, C. V. O., & Vrana, S. R. (2007). Play it again Sam: Repeated exposure to<br />

emotionally evocative music polarises liking and smiling responses, and influences<br />

other affective reports, facial EMG, and heart rate. Cognition and Emotion, 21, 3–25.<br />

Zeffirelli, F.(Director). (2002). Maria callas – At Covent Garden 1962 and 1964. US and<br />

Canada: EMI Classics.<br />

Zentner, M., Grandjean, D., & Scherer, K. R. (2008). Emotions evoked by the sound of<br />

music: Characterization, classification, and measurement. Emotion, 8(4), 494–521.<br />

Please cite this article in press as: Baltesß, F. R., et al. Emotions induced by operatic music: Psychophysiological effects of music, plot, and acting. Brain and<br />

Cognition (2011), doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2011.01.012

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!