01.05.2015 Views

o_19k6fnuqrsa6ie3qb2a3718pvi.pdf

Transform your PDFs into Flipbooks and boost your revenue!

Leverage SEO-optimized Flipbooks, powerful backlinks, and multimedia content to professionally showcase your products and significantly increase your reach.

Int. J. Devl Neuroscience 28 (2010) 105–109<br />

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect<br />

International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience<br />

journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ijdevneu<br />

Perinatal exposure to music protects spatial memory against callosal lesions<br />

Anca Amagdei, Felicia Rodica Balteş, Julia Avram, Andrei C. Miu *<br />

Program of Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, Babes-Bolyai University, 37 Republicii St., Cluj-Napoca, CJ 400015, Romania<br />

ARTICLE<br />

INFO<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Article history:<br />

Received 28 May 2009<br />

Received in revised form 21 July 2009<br />

Accepted 30 August 2009<br />

Keywords:<br />

Music<br />

Neuroprotection<br />

Spatial memory<br />

Corpus callosum<br />

Callosotomy<br />

Several studies have indicated that the exposure of rodents to music modulates brain development and<br />

neuroplasticity, by mechanisms that involve facilitated hippocampal neurogenesis, neurotrophin<br />

synthesis and glutamatergic signaling. This study focused on the potential protection that the perinatal<br />

exposure to music, between postnatal days 2 and 32, could offer against functional deficits induced by<br />

neonatal callosotomy in rats. The spontaneous alternation and marble-burying behaviors were<br />

longitudinally measured in callosotomized and control rats that had been exposed to music or not. The<br />

results indicated that the neonatal callosotomy-induced spontaneous alternation deficits that became<br />

apparent only after postnatal day 45, about the time when the rat corpus callosum reaches its maximal<br />

levels of myelination. The perinatal exposure to music efficiently protected the spontaneous alternation<br />

performance against the deficits induced by callosotomy. The present findings may offer important<br />

insights into music-induced neuroplasticity, relevant to brain development and neurorehabilitation.<br />

ß 2009 ISDN. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.<br />

An increasing literature has started to document the effects of<br />

music on brain development and neuroplasticity in animal models.<br />

Even compared with species-specific auditory stimuli, the exposure<br />

of chicken embryos to music induces increased volumes and neuron<br />

densities in brainstem auditory nuclei (Wadhwa et al., 1999).<br />

Indeed, developing rats that have been prenatally exposed to music<br />

also show increased hippocampal neurogenesis, as well as facilitated<br />

spatial memory (Fukui and Toyoshima, 2008; Kim et al., 2006).<br />

The effects of music on neurogenesis might be mediated by the<br />

neurotrophin synthesis in the brain. The perinatal exposure to music<br />

reduces the level of nerve growth factor (NGF), and increases the<br />

level of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in the hippocampus<br />

and hypothalamus of mice (Angelucci et al., 2007a,b). Music<br />

is also associated with the superior performance of mice in passive<br />

avoidance tasks (Angelucci et al., 2007a). In addition, a similar<br />

manipulation increases the levels of the BDNF-receptor, tyrosine<br />

kinase receptor B (TrkB), and 3-phosphoinositide-dependent<br />

protein kinase-1 (PDK1), which is one of the downstream targets<br />

in BDNF/TrkB signaling (Chikahisa et al., 2006). The activation of this<br />

signaling pathway correlates negatively with the number of errors<br />

that mice make in a cross-maze.<br />

Perinatal music exposure also stimulates glutamate signaling<br />

by increasing the levels of AMPA receptor GluR2 subunit in the<br />

Abbreviations: BDNF, brain-derived neurotrophic factor; CC, corpus callosum; NGF,<br />

nerve growth factor; PDK1, 3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase-1; PN,<br />

postnatal day; TrkB, tyrosine kinase receptor B.<br />

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +40 264 590967; fax: +40 264 590967.<br />

E-mail address: andrei_miu@emcoglab.org (A.C. Miu).<br />

auditory cortex and cingulate gyrus of rats (Xu et al., 2007), as well<br />

as NMDA receptor NR2B subunit in the auditory cortex (Xu et al.,<br />

2009). The latter effect is also associated with increased auditory<br />

discrimination in developing rats. Finally, postnatal music<br />

exposure increases the dopamine levels in the neostriatum, which<br />

are associated with reduced systolic blood pressure in spontaneously<br />

hypertensive rats (Sutoo and Akiyama, 2004). Overall,<br />

these findings in animal models argue for the specific neurobiological<br />

effects of music exposure, which not surprisingly seem to be<br />

enhanced during brain development.<br />

Recent studies in humans show that music exposure can also be<br />

beneficial in neurorehabilitation (Sarkamo et al., 2008). Music<br />

listening is associated with facilitated recovery of verbal memory<br />

and focused attention, as well as less affective symptoms in<br />

patients with middle cerebral artery stroke (Sarkamo et al., 2008).<br />

Music also enhances visual awareness in neuropsychological<br />

patients with visual neglect, by inducing positive affect associated<br />

with the increased activation and functional coupling of the<br />

frontal, spared parietal, and occipital cortical areas involved in<br />

emotion, attention, and early vision processing (Soto et al., 2009).<br />

Similar mechanisms may contribute to the beneficial effects that<br />

learning to play musical instruments has on the motor recovery of<br />

stroke patients (Schneider et al., 2007). However, it has been<br />

acknowledged that the effects of an enriched sound environment<br />

on recovery from neural damage have only been studied in a<br />

handful of human studies and no animal models (Sarkamo et al.,<br />

2008). To our knowledge, the only relevant study in this line<br />

included music in a more general enriched environment experimental<br />

condition applied to developing rats that had undergone<br />

0736-5748/$36.00 ß 2009 ISDN. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.<br />

doi:10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2009.08.017


106<br />

A. Amagdei et al. / Int. J. Devl Neuroscience 28 (2010) 105–109<br />

Fig. 1. A schematic outline of the experimental design of this study. ‘‘’’ designates manipulation; ‘‘O’’ designates measurement.<br />

experimental status epilepticus (Faverjon et al., 2002). This study<br />

showed that, as part of the enriched environment, music increases<br />

the hippocampal neurogenesis and a key transcription factor (i.e.,<br />

phosphorylated cyclic AMP response element protein) in the<br />

molecular cascade of learning neuroplasticity, and facilitates<br />

spatial memory.<br />

The present study focused on the effects of perinatal exposure<br />

to music on behavioral performance in developing rats that<br />

underwent callosotomy in their first postnatal (PN) day (PN1).<br />

Based on previous suggestions that music influences behavior via<br />

mechanisms that it shares with spatial processing (Aoun et al.,<br />

2005; Cupchik et al., 2001; Rauscher et al., 1998), or facilitated<br />

emotional arousal (Thompson et al., 2001), we chose to assess<br />

spatial memory and emotional reactivity in the present study. To<br />

this purpose, the non-invasive and ethologically relevant procedures<br />

of spontaneous alternation in a T-maze (Deacon and Rawlins,<br />

2006), and marble burying (Deacon, 2006) were used. In light of<br />

previous observations that the development and functions of the<br />

corpus callosum (CC) are influenced by music (Patston et al., 2007;<br />

Schlaug et al., 1995), the present study tested the potential<br />

beneficial effects of music against neonatal callosotomy. Therefore,<br />

the design of this animal model was carefully adapted to be<br />

relevant to the human literature on music, brain and behavior.<br />

1. Experimental procedures<br />

Wistar female rats (N = 12) were allowed to mate with male rats for 24 h. One<br />

day later, females were separated from males, and housed individually under<br />

controlled temperature (20–22 8C) and light–dark cycle (light on from 07:00 to<br />

19:00). Food and water were available ad libitum. The resulting N = 57 pups were<br />

randomly distributed in four experimental groups: control; callosotomy; control<br />

+ music; and callosotomy + music. The survival rate was 96.49%, and two<br />

callosotomized animals were excluded from the analyses because they displayed<br />

signs of extracallosal damage. Therefore, the data reported here are based on the<br />

following samples: N = 14 control (7 females); N = 13 callosotomy (6 females);<br />

N = 10 control + music (6 females); and N = 16 callosotomy + music (8 females).<br />

Until PN21, the pups were housed together with their mother. Weanlings were then<br />

separated by sex and housed in groups of 3–6 animals per cage.<br />

The rats in the auditory enriched conditions were exposed to music during<br />

their active nocturnal period. A playlist that included 42 piano compositions of<br />

Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart (see Supplementary Material) was continuously<br />

played (65–75 dB) for 12 h, between 19:00 and 07:00. In contrast to other<br />

similar studies, we chose to expose rats to a wider set of musical stimuli in<br />

order to maximize their auditory enrichment, especially considering that due to<br />

their higher absolute auditory threshold, they hear about half (i.e., sounds<br />

>500 Hz, corresponding to a point between B 5 and C 5 on the keyboard) of the<br />

available piano notes in a given sonata (Steele, 2003). They are deaf to air-borne<br />

sounds (i.e., but not bone sound conduction) until PN11, but they display<br />

cochlear microphonic responses from PN2, and auditory brainstem responses<br />

from PN7–10 (Steele, 2003). The rats in the two experimental groups<br />

(control + music, and callosotomy + music) were exposed to this music each<br />

night, between PN2 and PN32 (see Fig. 1). Therefore, this developmental period<br />

starts after the neural circuit that supports hearing becomes functional, and<br />

covers the time when the myelination and functional maturation of the CC takes<br />

place in the brain of rats.<br />

In PN1, the pups underwent callosotomy or sham surgery, as described in<br />

Manhaes et al. (2003). Briefly, a small incision was made on the rat’s scalp cartilage,<br />

behind the sinusoidal lambda and over the superior colliculus. A miniscalpel was<br />

then inserted caudorostrally underneath the dorsal sagittal sinus and moved<br />

slightly downward while pulled back. Finally, a small amount of thrombin was<br />

applied near the incision to control bleeding, and the incision was then closed using<br />

acrylate glue. Neonates were placed back with their littermates in warmed cages<br />

and after approximately 12 h they were returned to their mother. For the sham<br />

surgery, the procedure was identical except that the miniscalpel was not actually<br />

inserted in the brain.<br />

The behavioral assessment was done at four time points during development<br />

(Fig. 1), which were carefully selected considering the following developmental<br />

landmarks in rats: the body volume doubles and the anatomical features of the<br />

external ear develop around PN5 in rat pups; their coat starts to develop, and motor<br />

coordination improves by PN7–12; their eyes open at PN12–14. Therefore, the first<br />

behavioral assessments were done at PN16, and followed-up at PN45, PN75 and<br />

PN104 (Baker et al., 1979).<br />

Spontaneous alternation in a T-maze and marble burying were measured<br />

according to standard protocols (Deacon, 2006; Deacon and Rawlins, 2006).<br />

Essentially, the spontaneous alternation in a T-maze measures the natural<br />

tendency of rats to alternate the choice of an arm if information concerning the<br />

arm that they previously visited is available in their spatial working memory<br />

(Clark et al., 2000; Deacon and Rawlins, 2006). In addition to being less aversive<br />

compared to other spatial memory procedures (e.g., Morris water maze),<br />

spontaneous alternation is also more sensitive to hippocampal dysfunction and<br />

AMPA receptor manipulations (Deacon and Rawlins, 2005; Reisel et al., 2002),<br />

which have also been related to the effects of music in rodents. The procedure<br />

involved a forced choice, in which the animal is placed in the start arm and<br />

allowed to enter the open arm (i.e., the other one is blocked by a guillotine door);<br />

after confined in that arm for 30 s, the animal is gently replaced in the start area,<br />

facing away from the arms; in the following free-choice phase, it is allowed to<br />

choose between the two open arms. Therefore, each trial includes a forced and a<br />

free-choice phase, and it was limited to 2 min, according to standard protocols<br />

(Deacon and Rawlins, 2006). In order to avoid experimenter and side preference<br />

biases, the experimenter was blind to the animal’s group, and the arm that was<br />

blocked during the forced choices was counterbalanced between days and<br />

groups. In addition, the rates of spontaneous alternation were corrected for<br />

response biases (Clark et al., 2000; Douglas, 1966; Miu et al., 2006). Five trials<br />

are usually sufficient for rats to develop >75% alternation rates (Dember and<br />

Richman, 1989),butinthisstudyandaccordingto(Clark et al., 2000), each rat<br />

was given two trials, separated by 2 h, each day for 5 days (10 trials total). In<br />

addition to the number of alternations, the response latencies were also<br />

recorded as general indices of sensory-motor integrity. One week before<br />

spontaneous alternation testing, rats were placed on a food restriction schedule<br />

that reduced their body weights to 80–85% of baseline and then maintained their<br />

weights at that level.<br />

Marble burying is a behavior that is also sensitive to hippocampal lesions and<br />

glutamate receptor manipulations (Bespalov et al., 2008; Deacon and Rawlins,<br />

2005; Njung’e and Handley, 1991). It is still debated whether it reflects emotional<br />

reactivity or simply species-typical digging behavior (Deacon, 2006), but recent<br />

observations that this behavior increases in response to stress (Mikics et al., 2008),<br />

and is inhibited by anxiolytics (Broekkamp et al., 1986) argue for its relationship<br />

with emotional reactivity. Essentially, the procedure involved placing a single rat in<br />

a cage filled with 5-cm deep wood chip bedding that was tamped down to make a<br />

flat surface; 12 marbles were placed in a regular pattern, with a 4-cm distance<br />

between them; the number of marbles buried with bedding during 30-min<br />

observations were recorded (Deacon, 2006).<br />

At the end of the behavioral experiments (PN110), the rats were anesthetized<br />

using Nembutal. They were killed by a transcardial perfusion–fixation procedure,<br />

their brains were removed and placed in 10% paraformaldehyde for 24 h,<br />

stereotaxically dissected, and embedded in paraffin. Twenty-micrometers thick<br />

frontal, sagittal and horizontal sections were cut using a microtome and stained for<br />

myelin, with Nissl counterstain according to the Klüver-Barrera method. All<br />

sections were analyzed using an Olympus CX41 microscope and representative<br />

sections covering the rostrum, body and splenium of the corpus callosum were<br />

selected and reconstructed.<br />

The statistical analyses of the data were carried out using analysis of variance<br />

(ANOVA) followed by post hoc tests, and corrected for multiple comparisons. The<br />

experiment conformed to European Communities Council Directive 86/609/EEC<br />

(1986), and the international guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals<br />

(Clark and NRC Committee, 1997).


A. Amagdei et al. / Int. J. Devl Neuroscience 28 (2010) 105–109 107<br />

Fig. 2. Histological sections showing callosotomy (arrowheads in A–D), in comparison to the integer corpus callosum (insets in A–D) and complete midline transection (F;<br />

arrowheads indicate the transected corpus callosum and anterior commissure). The sagittal section in E illustrates the integrity of the hippocampal commissure in<br />

callosotomized rats, and the inset in F shows ectopic fibers located near the longitudinal fissure in a horizontal section from a callosotomized rat. Numbers in the top left<br />

corner indicate the approximate stereotaxical frontal or sagittal plane of the section. The white squares in A–D identify the areas corresponding to those represented in insets.<br />

2. Results<br />

2.1. Histological verification of the lesions<br />

The analyses of the sections indicated that all except two animals<br />

in the callosotomy groups displayed complete section of the CC.<br />

There were no discriminable differences between the lesions of the<br />

two experimental groups (i.e., callosotomy and callosotomy + music).<br />

The animals with extracallosal lesions were therefore excluded<br />

from all subsequent analyses. We carefully verified on frontal and<br />

sagittal sections that there was no damage to the hippocampal or<br />

anterior commissures (see Fig. 2A–E), the hippocampus itself, and<br />

the frontal cortex (i.e., areas that are involved in spontaneous<br />

alternation). In frontal and horizontal sections from several animals,<br />

we identified ectopic longitudinal bundles parallel to the interhemispheric<br />

line (see inset in Fig. 2F). We found no evidence of ectopic<br />

groups of neurons in the isocortex of callosotomized rats.<br />

2.2. Behavioral results<br />

A 4 (group: control vs. callosotomy vs. control + music vs.<br />

callosotomy + music) 4 (test: PN16 vs. PN45 vs. PN75 vs. PN104)<br />

repeated measure ANOVA indicated the significant main effects of<br />

group (F [3,49] = 11.64, P < 0.0001, h 2 = 0.9) and test (F [3,49] = 5.1,<br />

P < 0.01, h 2 = 0.83) on spontaneous alternation (Fig. 3). There<br />

was also a marginally significant effect of test on spontaneous<br />

alternation latencies (P = 0.051).<br />

Follow-up Student’s t-tests showed that the spontaneous<br />

alternation performance of all groups was at the chance level in<br />

the PN16 test (t [50] = 1.51, P = 0.1). The spontaneous alternation<br />

performance was significantly higher than the chance level in all<br />

subsequent tests for the two control groups (overall t [22] = 6.82,<br />

P < 0.0001, Cohen’s d = 0.8); it approached significance (P =0.053)<br />

in PN45 and reached statistical significance (t [14] = 2.3, P < 0.02,<br />

Cohen’s d = 0.76) in PNs 75 and 104 for the callosotomy + music<br />

group; and it was significantly lower than the chance level in PNs 45,<br />

75 and 104 tests for the callosotomy group. Bonferroni-corrected<br />

post hoc contrasts indicated the following overall pattern of<br />

performance in the PN45–75–104 tests (mean differences between<br />

brackets): control control + music > callosotomy + music (28%<br />

less than control, and 20.55% less than control + music) > callosotcallosotomy<br />

(30% less than callosotomy + music).<br />

Follow-up Student’s t-tests also indicated a significant difference<br />

between the spontaneous alternation latencies in PN16 test


108<br />

A. Amagdei et al. / Int. J. Devl Neuroscience 28 (2010) 105–109<br />

Fig. 3. Spontaneous alternation performance tested at four postnatal days (PN).<br />

Solid symbols represent the groups that were exposed to music, and open symbols<br />

represent those that were not exposed to music. Dashed lines represent<br />

callosotomized rats, and continuous lines represent control rats. The horizontal<br />

line in the middle of the graph shows the chance level.<br />

and the subsequent tests (t [50] = 4.3, P < 0.001, Cohen’s d = 1.18),<br />

with a mean difference of 19.28 s between the PN16 (higher<br />

latency) and the subsequent latencies. There were no statistically<br />

significant differences between the latencies in PN45, 75 and 104<br />

tests.<br />

A 4 (group: control vs. callosotomy vs. control + music vs.<br />

callosotomy + music) 4 (test: PN16 vs. PN45 vs. PN75 vs. PN104)<br />

repeated measure ANOVA found no statistically significant effects<br />

on the number of buried marbles in the marble-burying test.<br />

3. Discussion<br />

The results of this study supported our predictions that<br />

callosotomy induces spatial memory deficits, and perinatal<br />

exposure to music protects against these functional deficits in<br />

developing rats. Both effects were supported by the present<br />

longitudinal observations on rats between PN45 and PN104. In<br />

addition, these deficits were not accompanied by alterations of<br />

marble-burying behavior, or increases of response latencies in the<br />

spontaneous alternation task.<br />

Increasing evidence has shown that the neonatal callosotomy in<br />

rodents is associated with massive reorganization of long-distance<br />

cortical projections, as well as deficits in behaviors relying on<br />

interhemispheric transfer of visuo-spatial information. For<br />

instance, it was reported that this lesion induces the formation<br />

of ectopic commisural fibers crossing to the contralateral hemisphere<br />

through callosal remnants above the septum, or the<br />

anterior commisure in hamsters (Lent, 1983). The same lesion in<br />

newborn mice is associated with reduced thickness of callosally<br />

innervated cortical areas (Ribeiro-Carvalho et al., 2006), increased<br />

lateralization of rotations to the dominant side in free swimming<br />

tests (Manhaes et al., 2007), and a left side bias in paw preference<br />

tests (Manhaes et al., 2003). We previously found that callosotomy<br />

induces spontaneous alternation deficits in adult rats, which were<br />

not confounded by spatial preference biases (Miu et al., 2006).<br />

Using callosotomy and crossed lesions, subsequent studies<br />

suggested that a crossed fronto-striatal circuit underlies the<br />

performance in a more complex operant delayed alternation task<br />

(White and Dunnett, 2006).<br />

The present study contributes to this literature by showing for<br />

the first time that neonatal callosotomy is also associated with<br />

spontaneous alternation deficits. Rats that underwent callosotomy<br />

in PN1 had approximately 38% fewer spontaneous alternations<br />

than controls. This deficit was apparent after PN45, which is in line<br />

with other studies indicating that spontaneous alternation<br />

develops at above-chance levels only after PN30 in rats (Egger<br />

et al., 1973). Histological and neuroimaging studies also show that<br />

CC is visible at PN1 in rats, but its myelination starts at about PN12<br />

and reaches its maximum at PN45 (Bockhorst et al., 2008; Wiggins,<br />

1986). Therefore, it is possible that the fronto-striatal circuit<br />

underlying spontaneous alternation becomes functional after<br />

myelination of the CC reaches a critical stage. At any rate, the<br />

spontaneous alternation deficit that we induced by callosotomy at<br />

PN1 may be clinically relevant, especially considering the relative<br />

correspondence of brain development at PN7 in rats, and that of<br />

premature or full-term infants (Vannucci et al., 1999). Also, in light<br />

of the interest of perinatal callosal lesions and working memory in<br />

humans (Santhouse et al., 2002), this rat model of callosotomyinduced<br />

deficits in spontaneous alternation offers a framework for<br />

experimental investigations of the effects of controlled lesions of<br />

the CC on behaviors that depend on working memory.<br />

The other main finding of the present study is that perinatal<br />

exposure to music protects the development of spontaneous<br />

alternation against callosotomy. Previous studies have found that<br />

the effects of music on neuroplasticity in developing rats involve<br />

hippocampal (Angelucci et al., 2007a; Kim et al., 2006) and<br />

glutamate receptor-dependent mechanisms (Xu et al., 2007, 2009).<br />

Perinatal exposure to music also modulates the levels of certain<br />

neurotrophins (e.g., BDNF) in the brain (Angelucci et al., 2007b;<br />

Chikahisa et al., 2006), in a manner that is quantitatively related to<br />

spatial learning performance (Chikahisa et al., 2006). The<br />

behavioral tasks that we used in the present study are sensitive<br />

to hippocampal dysfunctions (Deacon and Rawlins, 2005; Njung’e<br />

and Handley, 1991), as well as glutamate receptor manipulations<br />

(Bespalov et al., 2008; Reisel et al., 2002). Therefore, perinatal<br />

exposure to music may have protected these behaviors against<br />

callosotomy, based on mechanisms that involve hippocampal and<br />

glutamatergic signaling. In light of the studies showing the cortical<br />

facilitation of experience-dependent neuronal growth following<br />

callosotomy in rats (Adkins et al., 2002), it is also possible that the<br />

protective effect of music that we identified in the present study is<br />

supported by a neurotrophin-dependent mechanism. However,<br />

the histological analyses included in the present study were<br />

limited and did not allow us to investigate in-depth the degree to<br />

which the protective effects of music extended to the neural level<br />

(e.g., reorganization of neural circuits). Future immunohistochemical<br />

and electron microscopic studies of the neural mechanisms by<br />

which music protects spatial memory against callosotomy would<br />

be worthwhile, especially in light of the important effect that early<br />

music exposure has on the volume of the area of the CC in humans<br />

(Schlaug et al., 1995). Moreover, this animal model may be relevant<br />

to neurorehabilitation in other pathologies, such as stroke or<br />

epilepsy (Faverjon et al., 2002; Sarkamo et al., 2008).<br />

Animal studies of music-induced neuroplasticity have borrowed<br />

from the human literature the claim that music may<br />

facilitate spatial performance either by facilitated emotional<br />

arousal, increased vigilance, or computations that music and<br />

spatial processing share (Cupchik et al., 2001; Rauscher et al.,<br />

1993; Thompson et al., 2001). The present study showed that<br />

perinatal music exposure does not influence marble-burying<br />

behavior. This behavior is increased in rats that have been exposed<br />

to stressors (Mikics et al., 2008), an effect that may indicate the<br />

sensitivity of marble burying to emotional arousal. Therefore, the<br />

results reported here suggest that music stimulates spatial<br />

information processing by mechanisms other than emotional<br />

arousal. However, this issue needs further scrutiny using more<br />

specific emotional reactivity tasks (e.g., open-field, fear conditioning),<br />

and it may turn out as a point of divergence related to the<br />

mechanisms that mediate the cognitive effects of music in animals<br />

and humans. Music may influence brain and cognition by<br />

emotional mechanisms in humans, and more general mechanisms<br />

(e.g., vigilance) in animals.<br />

In conclusion, this study offers the first evidence that neonatal<br />

callosotomy induces spatial memory deficits that become apparent


A. Amagdei et al. / Int. J. Devl Neuroscience 28 (2010) 105–109 109<br />

in developing rats after PN45. We have also shown that perinatal<br />

exposure to music offers an efficient protection against these<br />

functional deficits. These results are contributing to the developing<br />

research on the potential neuroprotective effects of music in animals<br />

and humans, with important implications for music-induced<br />

neuroplasticity and neurorehabilitation.<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

We are grateful to several colleagues from our laboratory who<br />

contributed to the behavioral measurements, and Dr. Constantin<br />

Puica (Institute of Biological Research, Cluj-Napoca) who coordinated<br />

the histological analyses. We also thank Mr. Horia Borza for<br />

help with the space required in this study. This study was<br />

supported by the Romanian Ministry of Education and Research<br />

through grants CEEX 131/2006 and 124/2006.<br />

Appendix A. Supplementary data<br />

Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in<br />

the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2009.08.017.<br />

References<br />

Adkins, D.L., Bury, S.D., Jones, T.A., 2002. Laminar-dependent dendritic spine<br />

alterations in the motor cortex of adult rats following callosal transection<br />

and forced forelimb use. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 78 (1), 35–52.<br />

Angelucci, F., Fiore, M., Ricci, E., Padua, L., Sabino, A., Tonali, P.A., 2007a. Investigating<br />

the neurobiology of music: brain-derived neurotrophic factor modulation in<br />

the hippocampus of young adult mice. Behav. Pharmacol. 18 (5–6), 491–496.<br />

Angelucci, F., Ricci, E., Padua, L., Sabino, A., Tonali, P.A., 2007b. Music exposure<br />

differentially alters the levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor and nerve<br />

growth factor in the mouse hypothalamus. Neurosci. Lett. 429 (2–3), 152–155.<br />

Aoun, P., Jones, T., Shaw, G.L., Bodner, M., 2005. Long-term enhancement of maze<br />

learning in mice via a generalized Mozart effect. Neurol. Res. 27 (8), 791–796.<br />

Baker, H.J., Linsley, J.R., Weisbroth, S.H. (Eds.), 1979. The Laboratory Rat, Vol. I.<br />

Biology and Diseases. Academic Press, New York.<br />

Bespalov, A.Y., van Gaalen, M.M., Sukhotina, I.A., Wicke, K., Mezler, M., Schoemaker,<br />

H., et al., 2008. Behavioral characterization of the mGlu group II/III receptor<br />

antagonist, LY-341495, in animal models of anxiety and depression. Eur. J.<br />

Pharmacol. 592 (1–3), 96–102.<br />

Bockhorst, K.H., Narayana, P.A., Liu, R., Ahobila-Vijjula, P., Ramu, J., Kamel, M., et al.,<br />

2008. Early postnatal development of rat brain: in vivo diffusion tensor imaging.<br />

J. Neurosci. Res. 86 (7), 1520–1528.<br />

Broekkamp, C.L., Rijk, H.W., Joly-Gelouin, D., Lloyd, K.L., 1986. Major tranquillizers<br />

can be distinguished from minor tranquillizers on the basis of effects on<br />

marble burying and swim-induced grooming in mice. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 126<br />

(3), 223–229.<br />

Chikahisa, S., Sei, H., Morishima, M., Sano, A., Kitaoka, K., Nakaya, Y., et al., 2006.<br />

Exposure to music in the perinatal period enhances learning performance<br />

and alters BDNF/TrkB signaling in mice as adults. Behav. Brain Res. 169 (2),<br />

312–319.<br />

Clark, J.D., NRC Committee, 1997. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.<br />

National Academy of Sciences, Washington.<br />

Clark, R.E., Zola, S.M., Squire, L.R., 2000. Impaired recognition memory in rats after<br />

damage to the hippocampus. J. Neurosci. 20 (23), 8853–8860.<br />

Cupchik, G.C., Phillips, K., Hill, D.S., 2001. Shared processes in spatial rotation and<br />

musical permutation. Brain Cogn. 46 (3), 373–382.<br />

Deacon, R.M., 2006. Digging and marble burying in mice: simple methods for in vivo<br />

identification of biological impacts. Nat. Protoc. 1 (1), 122–124.<br />

Deacon, R.M., Rawlins, J.N., 2005. Hippocampal lesions, species-typical behaviours<br />

and anxiety in mice. Behav. Brain Res. 156 (2), 241–249.<br />

Deacon, R.M., Rawlins, J.N., 2006. T-maze alternation in the rodent. Nat. Protoc. 1<br />

(1), 7–12.<br />

Dember, W.N., Richman, C.L., 1989. Spontaneous Alternation Behavior. Springer,<br />

New York.<br />

Douglas, R.J., 1966. Cues for spontaneous alternation. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 62<br />

(2), 171–183.<br />

Egger, G.J., Livesey, P.J., Dawson, R.G., 1973. Ontogenetic aspects of central cholinergic<br />

involvement in spontaneous alternation behavior. Dev. Psychobiol. 6 (4),<br />

289–299.<br />

Faverjon, S., Silveira, D.C., Fu, D.D., Cha, B.H., Akman, C., Hu, Y., et al., 2002. Beneficial<br />

effects of enriched environment following status epilepticus in immature rats.<br />

Neurology 59 (9), 1356–1364.<br />

Fukui, H., Toyoshima, K., 2008. Music facilitate the neurogenesis, regeneration and<br />

repair of neurons. Med. Hypotheses 71 (5), 765–769.<br />

Kim, H., Lee, M.H., Chang, H.K., Lee, T.H., Lee, H.H., Shin, M.C., et al., 2006. Influence<br />

of prenatal noise and music on the spatial memory and neurogenesis in the<br />

hippocampus of developing rats. Brain Dev. 28 (2), 109–114.<br />

Lent, R., 1983. Cortico-cortical connections reorganize in hamsters after neonatal<br />

transection of the callosal bridge. Brain Res. 313 (1), 137–142.<br />

Manhaes, A.C., Abreu-Villaca, Y., Schmidt, S.L., Filgueiras, C.C., 2007. Neonatal<br />

transection of the corpus callosum affects rotational side preference in adult<br />

Swiss mice. Neurosci. Lett. 415 (2), 159–163.<br />

Manhaes, A.C., Krahe, T.E., Caparelli-Daquer, E., Ribeiro-Carvalho, A., Schmidt, S.L.,<br />

Filgueiras, C.C., 2003. Neonatal transection of the corpus callosum affects paw<br />

preference lateralization of adult Swiss mice. Neurosci. Lett. 348 (2), 69–72.<br />

Mikics, E., Baranyi, J., Haller, J., 2008. Rats exposed to traumatic stress bury<br />

unfamiliar objects—a novel measure of hyper-vigilance in PTSD models?<br />

Physiol. Behav. 94 (3), 341–348.<br />

Miu, A.C., Heilman, R.M., Pasca, S.P., Stefan, C.A., Spanu, F., Vasiu, R., et al., 2006.<br />

Behavioral effects of corpus callosum transection and environmental enrichment<br />

in adult rats. Behav. Brain Res. 172 (1), 135–144.<br />

Njung’e, K., Handley, S.L., 1991. Evaluation of marble-burying behavior as a model of<br />

anxiety. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 38 (1), 63–67.<br />

Patston, L.L., Kirk, I.J., Rolfe, M.H., Corballis, M.C., Tippett, L.J., 2007. The unusual<br />

symmetry of musicians: musicians have equilateral interhemispheric transfer<br />

for visual information. Neuropsychologia 45 (9), 2059–2065.<br />

Rauscher, F.H., Robinson, K.D., Jens, J.J., 1998. Improved maze learning through early<br />

music exposure in rats. Neurol. Res. 20 (5), 427–432.<br />

Rauscher, F.H., Shaw, G.L., Ky, K.N., 1993. Music and spatial task performance.<br />

Nature 365 (6447), 611.<br />

Reisel, D., Bannerman, D.M., Schmitt, W.B., Deacon, R.M., Flint, J., Borchardt, T., et al.,<br />

2002. Spatial memory dissociations in mice lacking GluR1. Nat. Neurosci. 5 (9),<br />

868–873.<br />

Ribeiro-Carvalho, A., Manhaes, A.C., Abreu-Villaca, Y., Filgueiras, C.C., 2006. Early<br />

callosal absence disrupts the establishment of normal neocortical structure in<br />

Swiss mice. Int. J. Dev. Neurosci. 24 (1), 15–21.<br />

Santhouse, A.M., Ffytche, D.H., Howard, R.J., Williams, S.C., Stewart, A.L., Rooney, M.,<br />

et al., 2002. The functional significance of perinatal corpus callosum damage: an<br />

fMRI study in young adults. Brain 125 (Pt 8), 1782–1792.<br />

Sarkamo, T., Tervaniemi, M., Laitinen, S., Forsblom, A., Soinila, S., Mikkonen, M.,<br />

et al., 2008. Music listening enhances cognitive recovery and mood after middle<br />

cerebral artery stroke. Brain 131 (Pt 3), 866–876.<br />

Schlaug, G., Jancke, L., Huang, Y., Staiger, J.F., Steinmetz, H., 1995. Increased corpus<br />

callosum size in musicians. Neuropsychologia 33 (8), 1047–1055.<br />

Schneider, S., Schonle, P.W., Altenmuller, E., Munte, T.F., 2007. Using musical<br />

instruments to improve motor skill recovery following a stroke. J. Neurol.<br />

254 (10), 1339–1346.<br />

Soto, D., Funes, M.J., Guzman-Garcia, A., Warbrick, T., Rotshtein, P., Humphreys,<br />

G.W., 2009. Pleasant music overcomes the loss of awareness in patients with<br />

visual neglect. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106 (14), 6011–6016.<br />

Steele, K.M., 2003. Do rats show a Mozart effect? Music Percept. 21 (3), 251–265.<br />

Sutoo, D., Akiyama, K., 2004. Music improves dopaminergic neurotransmission:<br />

demonstration based on the effect of music on blood pressure regulation. Brain<br />

Res. 1016 (2), 255–262.<br />

Thompson, W.F., Schellenberg, E.G., Husain, G., 2001. Arousal, mood, and the Mozart<br />

effect. Psychol. Sci. 12 (3), 248–251.<br />

Vannucci, R.C., Connor, J.R., Mauger, D.T., Palmer, C., Smith, M.B., Towfighi, J., et al.,<br />

1999. Rat model of perinatal hypoxic–ischemic brain damage. J. Neurosci. Res.<br />

55 (2), 158–163.<br />

Wadhwa, S., Anand, P., Bhowmick, D., 1999. Quantitative study of plasticity in the<br />

auditory nuclei of chick under conditions of prenatal sound attenuation and<br />

overstimulation with species specific and music sound stimuli. Int. J. Dev.<br />

Neurosci. 17 (3), 239–253.<br />

White, A., Dunnett, S.B., 2006. Fronto-striatal disconnection disrupts operant<br />

delayed alternation performance in the rat. Neuroreport 17 (4), 435–441.<br />

Wiggins, R.C., 1986. Myelination: a critical stage in development. Neurotoxicology 7<br />

(2), 103–120.<br />

Xu, F., Cai, R., Xu, J., Zhang, J., Sun, X., 2007. Early music exposure modifies GluR2<br />

protein expression in rat auditory cortex and anterior cingulate cortex. Neurosci.<br />

Lett. 420 (2), 179–183.<br />

Xu, J., Yu, L., Cai, R., Zhang, J., Sun, X., 2009. Early auditory enrichment with music<br />

enhances auditory discrimination learning and alters NR2B protein expression<br />

in rat auditory cortex. Behav. Brain Res. 196 (1), 49–54.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!