03.06.2015 Views

Current and Future Dimensions of India's Material ... - IGEP.in

Current and Future Dimensions of India's Material ... - IGEP.in

Current and Future Dimensions of India's Material ... - IGEP.in

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

TERI- GIZ event<br />

on<br />

Resource Initiative –<br />

Leverag<strong>in</strong>g efficiency to meet India’s needs<br />

May 23, 2013<br />

Ligia Noronha<br />

Monika Dittrich<br />

Arpita Khanna<br />

Souvik Bhattacharjya


Dittrich, Giljum, Lutter, Polz<strong>in</strong>, 2012: Green economies around the world: Implications <strong>of</strong> resource use for development <strong>and</strong> the<br />

environment, Vienna. Page50.


India<br />

Germany<br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />

Average material consumption per capita <strong>in</strong> 2008<br />

Averages World India Ch<strong>in</strong>a S. Korea Japan Germany OECD<br />

Biomass 2.8 1.7 2.2 1.5 1.2 2.3 3.7<br />

Nonmetal<br />

M<strong>in</strong>erals<br />

Fossil<br />

fuels<br />

4.5 1.4 8.5 8.7 4.3 6.8 9.4<br />

1.9 0.7 2.3 4.4 3.8 5.2 4.9<br />

Metals 1.0 0.2 1.2 1.1 0.8 0.5 1.4<br />

total 10.2 4.0 14.2 15.8 10.2 14.8 19.4<br />

• Own calculation based on Dittrich, 2012 (trade), SERI, 2011<br />

(extraction), Worldbank, 2011 (population)


Dittrich, Giljum, Lutter, Polz<strong>in</strong>, 2012: Green economies around the world: Implications <strong>of</strong> resource use for development <strong>and</strong> the<br />

environment, Vienna. Page 29


http://www.earth-policy.org/Updates/Update45_data.htm<br />

Advertis<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong><br />

the narrative <strong>of</strong> the<br />

“good life”<br />

<strong>Material</strong><br />

Dem<strong>and</strong><br />

Drivers<br />

Data Source:<br />

McK<strong>in</strong>sey & Company,<br />

2010<br />

Rapid Urbanization: Rate <strong>of</strong> urbanization<br />

has <strong>in</strong>creased from 26% <strong>in</strong> 1991 to 30% <strong>in</strong><br />

2008. It is further expected to <strong>in</strong>crease to<br />

40% by 2030 (McK<strong>in</strong>sey 2010)<br />

Source: JNNURM Directorate, M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> Urban Development <strong>and</strong> National<br />

Institute <strong>of</strong> Urban Affairs (NIUA), 2011


Absolute biomass consumption<br />

Biomass consumption per capita<br />

In 2008,<br />

17% <strong>of</strong> global population live <strong>in</strong> India<br />

10.5% <strong>of</strong> global biomass extraction is consumed <strong>in</strong> India<br />

Per-capita-consumption biomass, India‘s place <strong>in</strong> world is 147<br />

• Own calculation based on Dittrich, 2012 (trade), SERI, 2011<br />

(extraction), Worldbank, 2011 (population)


• Own calculation based on Dittrich, 2012 (trade),<br />

SERI, 2011 (extraction), Worldbank, 2011<br />

0.1% phosphate rock<br />

8% limestone<br />

87% construction m<strong>in</strong>erals,<br />

On the whole, India is<br />

currently selfsufficient<br />

with regard<br />

to m<strong>in</strong>erals<br />

India is a net-importer, <strong>in</strong><br />

fertilizers, limestone<br />

<strong>and</strong> several <strong>in</strong>organic<br />

chemicals such as<br />

phosphorous pent<br />

oxides<br />

Import dependencies <strong>in</strong><br />

phosphates are high<br />

with 93% net-imports<br />

<strong>in</strong> consumption while<br />

it is low <strong>in</strong> limestone<br />

(2% net-imports<br />

consumption)<br />

In 2008,<br />

- India consumes 5% <strong>of</strong> globally extracted<br />

m<strong>in</strong>erals<br />

- per capita consumption <strong>of</strong> m<strong>in</strong>erals, place<br />

125 <strong>in</strong> world<br />

- Average growth rate: +26% p.a.


• Own calculation based on Dittrich, 2012 (trade), SERI, 2011<br />

(extraction), Worldbank, 2011 (population)<br />

In 2008,<br />

5.9 % <strong>of</strong> global fossil fuels extraction is consumed <strong>in</strong> India<br />

Per-capita-consumption <strong>of</strong> fossil fuels, India‘s place <strong>in</strong> world is 100<br />

Average growth rate: +15% p.a.


Av. growth +26% p.a.<br />

Av. growth +15% p.a.<br />

In 2008, India „consumes“ 3.2% <strong>of</strong> global metal extraction<br />

In per capita-values, India‘s „consumption“ ranges on place 108 <strong>in</strong> 2008<br />

• Extraction: SERI, 2011; trade: Dittrich, 2012; population: Worldbank,<br />

2011


<strong>Future</strong> dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> India, all materials<br />

Increase <strong>in</strong> material dem<strong>and</strong><br />

until 2030 is about 2.5 to 3<br />

fold, beyond that it is 4 to 5<br />

fold<br />

GOI data bases, <strong>Material</strong> specific projections<br />

MFA based projections


• Domestic resources<br />

• 97 % <strong>of</strong> all materials, consumed <strong>in</strong> India are<br />

extracted with<strong>in</strong> India.<br />

▪ However, meet<strong>in</strong>g a tripl<strong>in</strong>g dem<strong>and</strong> with domestic<br />

resources would mean that extraction has to <strong>in</strong>crease<br />

from currently around 4.5 billion tonnes up to more<br />

than 13 billion tonnes.<br />

• <strong>Material</strong>s are imported<br />

▪ India net imports around 3 % <strong>of</strong> all materials<br />

consumed. Meet<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g material dem<strong>and</strong><br />

by imports raises severe issues <strong>of</strong> global availability


• India’s m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g sector has one <strong>of</strong> the lowest<br />

exploration spends (MoM 2011).<br />

• The reserves for iron ore <strong>and</strong> bauxite <strong>in</strong><br />

Australia grew 150 to 200% between 1985<br />

<strong>and</strong> 2005. In contrast, <strong>in</strong> India they<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased by 10-20% only<br />

Source: Strategic plan, M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> M<strong>in</strong>es, Government <strong>of</strong> India


Metallic m<strong>in</strong>erals<br />

20000<br />

0<br />

17882<br />

Iron ore<br />

5982<br />

208<br />

India’s (unrealized)<br />

m<strong>in</strong>eral potential<br />

(<strong>in</strong> million tonnes)<br />

Industrial m<strong>in</strong>erals<br />

60000<br />

40000<br />

20000<br />

40906<br />

Lignite<br />

6145 38<br />

800 Manganese, Lead & Z<strong>in</strong>c, Chromite 685<br />

600<br />

400<br />

200<br />

0<br />

203<br />

32<br />

430<br />

97 109<br />

4 3 7<br />

Chromite Manganese Lead & Z<strong>in</strong>c<br />

Resources Reserves Production<br />

Bauxite ()<br />

350<br />

300<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

335<br />

296<br />

270<br />

103<br />

83<br />

55 67 73<br />

30<br />

0.5 21<br />

35<br />

1 1 2 0.05 0.2 2<br />

0<br />

Resources Reserves Production<br />

Coal<br />

293497<br />

300000<br />

200000<br />

118145<br />

100000<br />

533<br />

0<br />

Resources Reserves Production<br />

Petroleum<br />

4000<br />

3000<br />

3480<br />

1000<br />

757<br />

2000<br />

1000<br />

593<br />

13<br />

Resources Reserves Production<br />

500<br />

38<br />

0<br />

Resources Reserves Production<br />

Source: M<strong>in</strong>erals Yearbook 2011, Indian Bureau <strong>of</strong>Mi<strong>in</strong>es<br />

0<br />

Reserves<br />

Production


Increas<strong>in</strong>g constra<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>in</strong> social<br />

license to operate<br />

MMDR bill adresses<br />

some <strong>of</strong> these<br />

constra<strong>in</strong>ts<br />

Source: CSE<br />

14


Source: IBM 2011, M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong><br />

m<strong>in</strong>es<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Import dependency is projected to <strong>in</strong>crease to 90-93% for oil, 11-45% for coal by<br />

2031<br />

High anticipated domestic dem<strong>and</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ed with <strong>in</strong>adequate production will<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease import dependency for various m<strong>in</strong>erals & metals.<br />

Copper imports, for <strong>in</strong>stance, are expected to <strong>in</strong>crease 5 fold between 2009 <strong>and</strong>


Source: IMF data, WEO 2012, p 125


• At the height <strong>of</strong> the oil prices <strong>in</strong> July 2008, for example, the cost<br />

<strong>of</strong> import<strong>in</strong>g oil was almost 50% <strong>of</strong> its commodity exports; <strong>and</strong><br />

about 6% <strong>of</strong> GDP;<br />

• As per estimates <strong>of</strong> the International Energy Agency (IEA), a<br />

susta<strong>in</strong>ed $ 10/bbl oil-price <strong>in</strong>crease will result <strong>in</strong> a loss <strong>of</strong> 1% <strong>of</strong><br />

India’s GDP <strong>and</strong> 2.6% <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>flation <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g year<br />

<strong>of</strong> the price <strong>in</strong>crease<br />

• In 2031, Energy import bill is expected to constitute a large<br />

share <strong>of</strong> GDP (TERI: ~17% <strong>of</strong> GDP);<br />

• High oil prices impact the poor disproportionately as costs <strong>of</strong><br />

food, transport rise steeply<br />

• Economic risks to India exist both due to oil <strong>and</strong> metals<br />

dependence, but <strong>in</strong> case <strong>of</strong> metals, political risks may be higher.


Concentration <strong>in</strong> production & reserves<br />

Concentration at country level<br />

Source: DEFRA <strong>and</strong> BIS (2012<br />

Source: OECD (2010)<br />

Concentration at company level<br />

Metals<br />

Share <strong>of</strong><br />

world<br />

producti<br />

on Country M<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g company<br />

Antimon<br />

y 82-87% Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />

Hsikwangshan Tw<strong>in</strong>kl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Star<br />

Berylliu<br />

m 81-90% USA Brush Wellman (Delta)<br />

Palladiu<br />

m 45-65% Russia Norilsk<br />

Plat<strong>in</strong>um 77-80%<br />

South<br />

Africa<br />

Amplats-Implats-Lonn<strong>in</strong><br />

(Bushveld)<br />

Lithium 60-80% Chile<br />

Sociedad Quimica y M<strong>in</strong>era<br />

de chile SA- Soquimich<br />

(Salar d' Atacama)<br />

Niobium 90% Brazil<br />

Companhia Brasileira de<br />

Metallurgia e m<strong>in</strong>eracao<br />

CBMM (Araxa)<br />

Rare<br />

earths 85-95% Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />

Baotou Iron & Steel<br />

Company<br />

Tantalu<br />

m 60-70% Australia Sons <strong>of</strong> Gwalia<br />

Tungste<br />

n 75-84% Ch<strong>in</strong>a Jianxi Tungsten


• Use <strong>of</strong> reserve base for atta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g political objectives:<br />

• For <strong>in</strong>stance, Ch<strong>in</strong>a’s recent ban on exports <strong>of</strong> rare earths. The<br />

strategic control led to an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> its price by approx. 300-700%<br />

(US DoE 2010)<br />

• Trade measures <strong>in</strong> resource-rich economies:<br />

• Proliferation <strong>of</strong> trade distort<strong>in</strong>g measures. Ukra<strong>in</strong>e, Argent<strong>in</strong>a,<br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>a, Russia, <strong>and</strong> Tanzania are among the key countries <strong>in</strong><br />

apply<strong>in</strong>g such measures.<br />

Grow<strong>in</strong>g Conflicts <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>eral rich countries


• What materials can be <strong>in</strong> short supply beyond 2030?<br />

• How well placed are we with regard to the materials needed for a more<br />

susta<strong>in</strong>able way <strong>of</strong> life, e.g., renewable energy?<br />

• Does India need to th<strong>in</strong>k about resource efficiency given its current low<br />

consumption rates per capita but grow<strong>in</strong>g water , environmental <strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong><br />

stresses?<br />

• How much can we reduce the environmental <strong>and</strong> social footpr<strong>in</strong>t through<br />

enhanced resource efficiency?<br />

• What other transformations are required to ensure that the economy <strong>of</strong><br />

resources so achieved does not result <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> absolute<br />

consumption as warned by Jevons <strong>in</strong> his sem<strong>in</strong>al book The coal<br />

question?

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!