03.06.2015 Views

Lexical-Functional Grammar (LFG) Motivation for LFG LFG in a ...

Lexical-Functional Grammar (LFG) Motivation for LFG LFG in a ...

Lexical-Functional Grammar (LFG) Motivation for LFG LFG in a ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Subcategorization<br />

F-structure representation: Simple F-structures<br />

Subcategorization is done at f-structure<br />

• Verbs select <strong>for</strong> grammatical functions<br />

• Use the pred (predicate) feature to specify the semantic <strong>for</strong>m, e.g.,<br />

– yawn: pred ’yawn’<br />

– hit: pred ’hit’<br />

– give: pred ’give’<br />

– eat: pred ’eat’<br />

F-structure is a function from attributes to values<br />

• For the proper noun David, pred and num are attributes; ’David’ and sg are<br />

the correspond<strong>in</strong>g values<br />

» –<br />

pred ’David’<br />

(1)<br />

num sg<br />

• F-structures with<strong>in</strong> f-structures: David yawned<br />

2<br />

3<br />

pred ’yawn’<br />

tense past<br />

(2)<br />

"<br />

#<br />

6<br />

4 pred ’David’ 7<br />

subj<br />

5<br />

num sg<br />

7/50<br />

8/50<br />

Semantic <strong>for</strong>ms<br />

F-structure features<br />

Semantic <strong>for</strong>ms are actually uniquely <strong>in</strong>stantiated, so the previous f-structure can<br />

look like:<br />

2<br />

3<br />

pred ’yawn 37’<br />

tense past<br />

(3)<br />

"<br />

#<br />

6<br />

4 pred ’David 42’<br />

7<br />

subj<br />

5<br />

num sg<br />

This makes it more clear that each word makes a unique contribution to the<br />

f-structure.<br />

• Generally, not a crucial issue, so we leave the <strong>in</strong>dices off most f-structures<br />

What sorts of features can be used?<br />

• Ultimately, that’s up to the grammar writer<br />

• Commonly used features <strong>in</strong> <strong>LFG</strong> <strong>in</strong>clude aspect, prontype, v<strong>for</strong>m, etc.<br />

(see (17) <strong>in</strong> Dalrymple (2006))<br />

Important note:<br />

• <strong>LFG</strong> does not def<strong>in</strong>e a set of features or values which must be <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> an<br />

f-structure<br />

• So, one verb may def<strong>in</strong>e v<strong>for</strong>m, while another might leave it undef<strong>in</strong>ed.<br />

– This is different from HPSG, as we’ll see.<br />

9/50<br />

10/50<br />

F-structure representation: Sets<br />

F-structure representation: Sets<br />

Values can be sets, <strong>in</strong> order to handle phenomena with an unbounded number of<br />

elements, e.g. adjuncts, coord<strong>in</strong>ates<br />

David yawned quietly yesterday.<br />

2<br />

3<br />

pred ’yawn’<br />

tense past<br />

"<br />

#<br />

pred ’David’<br />

(4)<br />

subj<br />

num sg<br />

8h<br />

i 9<br />

6<br />

< pred ’quietly’ =<br />

7<br />

4adj<br />

h<br />

i 5<br />

: pred ’yesterday’ ;<br />

Sets can also have additional properties, i.e. have attributes and values which<br />

apply over the whole set—hybrid object<br />

• Or, properties can distribute over elements of the set (e.g., num feature below)<br />

David and Chris yawned.<br />

2<br />

3<br />

pred ’yawn’<br />

tense past<br />

2<br />

3<br />

num pl<br />

8"<br />

# 9<br />

(5)<br />

pred ’David’<br />

subj<br />

><<br />

num sg<br />

>=<br />

"<br />

#<br />

6 6<br />

4 4 pred ’Chris’<br />

7<br />

>: num sg<br />

>;<br />

5<br />

11/50<br />

12/50

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!