MPO Policy and Procedures Manual - Indianapolis Metropolitan ...
MPO Policy and Procedures Manual - Indianapolis Metropolitan ...
MPO Policy and Procedures Manual - Indianapolis Metropolitan ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
• Project Staff<br />
• Familiarity with <strong>Indianapolis</strong><br />
A general principle is to share contractor selection responsibilities with a larger group of<br />
stakeholders that intend to be regularly engaged in the project (such as a study review<br />
committee).<br />
Progress Reporting/Tracking<br />
Contractors will be provided with an electronic copy (Microsoft Word file format) of a progress<br />
report form. This form will be filled out <strong>and</strong> submitted with each invoice. The form asks for<br />
status, percent completion, <strong>and</strong> completion schedule for each contract-specified task. The<br />
reporting form also asks questions about difficulties, issues, <strong>and</strong> required actions for the project,<br />
as well as anticipated activities for the upcoming billing period.<br />
Deliverables<br />
Unless otherwise specified in the contract documents, all final deliverables will be provided with<br />
a camera-ready original (including maps), five full-color copies, <strong>and</strong> electronic files, in either<br />
native or PDF format. Also, upon contract closeout, any pertinent final meeting material<br />
originals, including but not limited to display boards, PowerPoint presentations, h<strong>and</strong>outs, etc.<br />
will be turned over to the <strong>MPO</strong> in both hardcopy <strong>and</strong> (if available) electronic format. All<br />
documents should be written in clear <strong>and</strong> concise language. The <strong>MPO</strong> retains the right to make<br />
corrections for both content <strong>and</strong> grammar, for which the contractor shall be held responsible.<br />
Contract timing <strong>and</strong> scope (PL funds)<br />
Contracts funded with federal PL funds should be scoped with the <strong>MPO</strong>’s grants management<br />
schedule in mind. Contract balances at the end of a particular grant cycle (which can be either<br />
one or two years in length) are obligated to the following year’s PL grant. For this reason,<br />
contracts using PL funds should be structured to minimize the amount carried over at the end of<br />
the grant cycle. Several principles emerge from this strategy:<br />
• The majority of contracts should be executed <strong>and</strong> begin early in the grant cycle<br />
• Studies that are expected to take several years to complete should be broken into<br />
annual phases<br />
• Contractors should target their contract scope <strong>and</strong> schedule for at least 95% completion<br />
45 days prior to the end of the grant cycle<br />
St<strong>and</strong>ard Project Management Issues<br />
Quality Assurance (QA)/Quality Control (QC)<br />
At significant (pre-determined) milestones, a quality assurance check should take place. At a<br />
minimum, two such checks should take place, at approximately the 50% completion mark <strong>and</strong><br />
delivery of draft final deliverables. A Principal Planner or higher staff member who is not<br />
associated with the project shall oversee the QA check. The review shall cover adherence to<br />
43