Oct. 7 - University of Victoria

If ‘no news is g d news’Tben bad news’ll doVdume 11. Number 7 UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA THURSDAY, OCTOBER 7.1971

THE MARTLET, October 7. 1971, Page 22 Plays for $1Lawrence Osgood'scomedy of the absurdPIGEONSUVlC 1 'HEATRE+Jean-Paul Sartre'sexistential masterpieceNO EXITPhoenix Theatre 8 pmTONIGHT andOct 8,9,14,15 and 16Box Office477-48212 Plays for $1 -EDUCATIQN STUDENTS.!Nominations now open for positions on =Education Undergraduate Student Society1. PRESIDENT2. VICE PRESIDENT (2nd year and above for 1 & 2 )3. EXTERNAL AFFAIRS CHAIRMAN4. EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES DIRECTOR5. SECRETARY60 TREASURER7. COMMUNICATIONS DIRECTORNOMINATIONS MUST BE IN BY OCT. 12= nomination forms at room 220 Maclaurin Bldg.

THE MARTLET, October 7. 1971. Page 3possibilities CCnnlimited99......says MeKinnon‘Abig, blue, funky dream’Approximately 100 studentsshowed up in the SUB Tuesdayloon to hear Bill Goede explainwhathe’ll do if studentssupport him on a referendumlext week.“While I cycled up thismorning I had a vision of whatI could do if you put this jobintoeffect.” he told the crowd.It was a “great, big,beautiful, blue, funky dream.”he said, and one that he’d liketo see become real.Goede roughly sketched anoutline for the course he hopedto offer, but stressed that itwas completely flexible andthat direction was really up tothose who got involved with it.“If you’re interested in this Iam.” he told the listeners, andsaid that the first thing to bedone would be to get togetherand decide “where we are nowand where we want to gooutside the curriculum.”The next step, said Goede,would be “to envision themode of transport we want tome to get there.”Goede said that he wasdiscouraged by the apparentatmosphere at Wic now.Apathy is back again, he said,after being driven out lastyear.“It seems to be an endlesscircle dance with no point toit.”Goede said that he sees “alot of downcast eyes on‘Someplace, somewhere we’ve got to do something about the endless circle dance.‘campus” now, and “I thinksomeplace, somewhere we’vegot to do something aboutthis”.Goede thinks that withstudent support he’d be able tochange the university’s atmosphere.The course he envisions, hesaid, would consist mostly ofsymposiums and rap sessions.During talk periods, he said,students would -discusseverything from Victoria’sdowntown newspapers, tostudent rights, literature andpoetry.“These are just ideas” hesaid, “I would hope that you’dinvent some.”.Issues will go totwo referenda next weekStudents wil decide theoutcome of two hot issuescurrently before theRepresentative Assembly.In a special meeting of theRA last Sunday night it wasdecided that referenda shouldbe held, in conjunction withthe RA elections nextTuesday, to determine ifpresent athletic fees should bereallocated and if Bill Goedeshould be hired by thestudents.The athletic’s referendumasks students if they would bein favour of redistributing the$6 fee which goes each year tothe athletics department, bygiving $4 to intra and extramurals,and $2 to AcademicAffairs.A second referendum will beheld concerning Bill Goede.It will ask students if theyincrease in fees in order to payGoede if hired.In a meeting of the RASunday night, called speciallyto discuss motions concerningthe referenda, AMS PresidentIan McKinnon told theAssembly that the move toreallocate fees was “unconstitutional”.McKinnon said that the $6which goes from each studentto athletics is separatefromthe AMs fee.“Technically our fee is not$32 but $28.” he said.MORE ON ATHLETICS REFERENDUM - PAGE TENPublications Director GregFraser also was in oppositionto the motion, but disagreedwith McKinnon’s stand,saying “I don’t really thinkit’s important whether it’slegal or not - it’s a moralquestion. You can’t just pull itout (student financial backingof athletics) after they’veplanned on it.“It’s not cricket.” he said.Academic Affairs chairman,Brian Greene, replied toMcKinnon’s charge of unconstitutionality,saying thatwhen the athletics fee wasapproved by referendumsome years ago it was done“under auspices of the AMs”.Greene said, “If Mr.McKinnon’s mint is correctwe’re guilty of legalmisrepresentation andeveryone is entitled to arefund”.Greene also said that personalviews of the athleticsmotion by RA members wereunimportant and that an issueof such importance should bedecided only by the students.The motion, which called forthe referendum to be heldOctober 12th, was carried.Along with the referenda onathletics and Goede, nextweek, students will be facedwith a referendum dealingwith the removal of membersof the RA.Students will be asked todecide whether or not anby United AppealUnited Appeal isdesperately looking forvolunteers to help canvas thecity, October 16th.A committee coordinator,Sonya Croucher, said thatUnited Appeal is having adifficult time recruitingworkers this year.She said that of the 40 peopleshe herself called and asked tohelp, only 3 respondedpositively.“When I think about whatthe students did here withShinerama . . . . I think theyput us to shame.” she said.Transportation will beprovided for all those whowish to help in the canvasing,and anyone interested intaking part in the blitz, orwanting more information,should call Mrs. Croucher at477-2135.-Les Laronde photoGoede stressed the pointthat he wouldn’t be taking thejob “just to show the administrationthathey couldn’tgel rid of me.”He said that he is completely“bored” with thewhole hassle.“I wouldn’t take this to takea crack at the administration.amendment to Article I1 of theConstitution should beallowed.Article I1 provides for theremoval of members of theRA if they have “failed toperform (their) duties in thebest interests of the society.”“The present machinery isvery cumbersome,” sayssecond year representativeAlastair Murdoch, “since itrequires first, that 100students sign a petition to thiseffect, and second, that ageneral meeting be held on thematter and that at least 500students attend this generalmeeting.”Murdoch says that“Although the machinery is tobe left intact, the proposedamendment sets up moreefficient means of accomplishingthe same end.“If an administration of-ficer has failed to perform hisduties in the best interests ofthe Society,” says Murdoch,“the RA may adopt a motionof nonconfidence in him by amajority vote. Following this,a referendum is held amongstthe students on the samequestion and if it receivesmajority support the administrativeofficer mustresign.”Administrative officers ofthe Society are those electedin January, as the President,Vice-president,Treasurer.andWhat’s the point when the)couldn’t care less.”Goede spake and answeredquestions for about half-an.hour, and when he finishedPresident Ian McKinnonaddressed the crowd, sayingthat next week’s referendumwas providing students with“a chance to do somethingwhich would be a milestonefor Canada, if not NorthAmerica.”“The possibilities for such aprogram are unlimited,” saidMcKinnon, who describedGoede as a “fantastic prof.”If students support thehiring of Goede next week,said McKinnon it would makeUVic worth attending from aneducational standpoint.You could go to your classesacross the Ring and get yourA-plus or D .... get yourdegree .... go out and sayyou’re trained for a job. Andwith Goede’s class you’d havethe opportunity to geteducated.”McKinnon urged thosewho’d heard Goede speak, andhad come to realize thepossibilities he offered, to“go out and tell five or tenfriends,” and get “thisuniversity turned on”.Member of the RepresentativeAssembly, DerryMcDonnell also spoke briefly,saying he hoped studentswouldn’t confuse the issues tobe presented by referendanext Tuesday.McDonnell said that theathletic referendum wascompletely separate from theGoede one, and that to supportone didn’t mean that you’dhave to reject the other.McDonnell said he hopedstudents would vote supportfor the hiring of Goede even ifthey opposed the $1 levy.He said there were otherways to raise the money ifthey needed it.SenateselectionssoonElections for undergraduate,graduatestudent and faculty positionson the Senate are all happeningin the next few weeks.The students may elect twoundergraduates for a term ofone year. Brian Alguire, A & S4, Deny McDonell A & S 4, andBob Higginbottom A & S Uhave been nominated. Theelection is Tuesday, Octoberla, and the votes are expeckdto be counted by laterthat evening.David Dunsmuir is runningfor reelection against DonaldA. Fernandez from thepsychology department. Theelection is by mail ballot andthe voting closes on Fridayafternoon. This is also for aone year term.The faculty are also votingby mail ballot on fourpositions of three years each,with eleven candidates tochooee from.

THE MARTLET, October 7, 1971, Page 4 ’l7ie MartletMember of the Canadian Univemity PressPublished .weekly throughout the University year In Victorla by the PublicationsDepartmentof the Alma Mater Society. Univemity d Vktd. Edltorlal opinionsexpressed art tbnse of the Editors of the Martlet and not necessarily those of the AlmaMater Society or the University of Victoria.bAuthorized as Second Class Mailby the Post Office Department. Ottawa, and forPayment 01 Pmtage in Cash.Subscription rates: $S.W for students and alumni per academic year. For nonstudents.$6.00 per academic year.Days: 477-Xi I Prlnted in Canadaby Mark HameIf student.. support the hiring of Bill Goede next week it willbe the lirst positive thing to have happened on this campus inyears.11 they do not support him - if they reject the proposaleithc.1 t1w:)use nf confusion over the athletics referendum, orsimply because they just don’t think they’d get anything outof it - it will prove they’ve deserved the treatment receivedover the past year.If students fail to vote support of Goede it will prove whatthe administration has been saying all along, students arewithout dignity, without pride- even worse, it will show theycompletely lack imagination and any real intelligence.”“_The McLaurin report. of course, wasn’t meant to be takenseriously - at least not by faculty and students. Thetribunal’s findings, and their activities leading up to thosefiudings. WCIT meant only as an image saver.Nnw you may say that the tribunal was a flop as a publicrc*lations job, simply because most students and faculty havela~~ghcvi at it. leaving the Board and Partridge as blackfacedas t*vo*~’ While that may appear to be the case. however, infacl il ih wt. 111 fact it’s been a smashing success, for theadministration h;~s taken in the people that really count -the tax paying public., The R.fcl.aurin farce wasn’t staged for students andfaculty. hut fnr the businessmen and housewives of Victoria.Proof of this came last week when, with the tribunal’sreport securily entrenched in his back pocket. Partridge -introduced as”by profession, a research physicist.” no lessaddresseda meeting of local Dairymen.That was just before the report was released (at leastbefore it was released to the Martlet or the Victoria DailyTimes - the Colonist, presumably for its good behaviour inthe past. received one in advance) but then Dr. Bruce and histravelling medicine shnw always has been one for jumpingthe gun when on certain ground. And right from the startthere was no doubt about McLaurin and his two side kicks.After all, you don’t bite the hand that pays you, especiallybefore it pays you.ky Dave ClimenhagaIf you get a chance, read theAdvisory Board’s report. Thethree board members, C.C.McLaurin, A. Brian, B.Carrothers, and Bernard E.Riedel, (Q.C., LL.D., Esq.,Q.C., MSc., Ph.D., respectively,in twos.) have outdonethemselves to produce adocument that any seriousstudent of satire cannot affordto miss. And if the thingdoesn’t appeal to your sense ofhumour, its sure to appeal toyour sense of righteous indignation.By far the best part is thelearned members“philosophical” section,chapter four, which dealswith, you guessed it, NaturalJustice. The commission’sdefinition of Natural Justiceis, as well as being just a trifleone sided, housed in some 01the most brilliant administrativeprose everrecorded. It couldn’t be betterif the president himself hadwritten it. (Of course, younever know, he just mighthave.) Here are some of thebest parts:“This dichotomy betweenadministrative and judicial,or variations thereof, becomesimportant in view of theconsequences of the fundamentalprinciple thatjudicial functions embody theobligation to observe the rulesof Natural Justice whereasabsolute administrativefunctions do not.“In the view of this AdvisoryBoard, Natural Justice hasbeen done if the person orcommittee making the“Odd that they should both be uphill!”possible in a number of the those particular activities, bysports for which we have necessity, more expensiverepresentative teams but in than others.view of the lack of present The prime requisites of anFloatingfacilities it is not possible inrumours Intramural programme are:others. These others such as 1) BODIES and 2)Volleyball, Basketball, Ice FACILITIES. An IntramuralSir; Hockey, and Soccer, Rugby programme does not need aIn view of all the rumors and have to rely on outside lot d money ta run, hut it doesinformation, both correct and competition to produce a need students to make it run,incorrect, that is floating viable programme. In some to both organizc it and pararoundahout the Athletic instances, this competition is ticipate in it. I? should also beProgramme, I would like toclarify a few points before thewhole question goes toreferendum.Ideally, a good extramuralprogramme grows, where it ispossible, from a strong Intramuralprogramme. This isrecommendation or decisionhas jurisdiction, if the applicablerules and procedureshaw been complied with andin this case there are carefullyworded and detailedprocedures specified in theTenure Document) and therehas been a fair hearing orconsideration in accordancewith such applicableprocedures and the terms ofthe enabling document. Theprocedure need not be that ofcourts of justice. The criteriaare fulfilled if, to paraphraseLord Shelbourne, the substantialrequirements ofjustice shall not be violatedana the essence of justice ispresent. Natural justice doesnot offer any particular formor method procedureelaborately worked out andspecified for the occasion,unless these are so clearly inerror or are so flagrantlyignored as to constitute amiscarriage or denial ofjustice.”The good board membersmay or may not have condoneda miscarriage ofjustice, but they have,definitely perpetrated a Iavailable locally - forexample in Rugby, Soccer, IceHockey, and Curling to namehut a few - for othershowever, the only availablecompetition is with otheruniversities or at least on thelower mainland. This makesmiscarriage of the Englishlanguage.As for the thought containedin this little passage from theGospels, what more couldwarm the hearts of suchfigures of history as AdolfHitler, Joe Stalin, and Attilathe Hun? It seems, accordingto the board members’definition, that the abovegentlemen all could havecomplied with natural justicein any thing they did, as longas they wrote it down andsigned their names at thehottom. Its quite clear thatAdolf and Joe did just that;and was it Attila the Hun’sfault that he couldn’t write? Somuch for “natural justice.”In the report we’re not toldthat there are other definitionsof natural justice, ones thatclaim victims of an action,just or unjust, have the rightto find out what the chargesagainst them are, and to replyto those charges in a free andopen atmosphere. And we’renot told that those otherdefinitions were broughtbefore the commission, asthey were. All they dothat administrationssay isof anya programme where studel!tscan get to know facultymembers in a different contextthan the classroom.The Athletic programme isalready working on ashoestring budget. And it’sContinued on Page 13kind don’t have to observenatural justice anyway, andsince they don’t, if they don’tthey do. If you take theirmeaning. George Orwellwould have.In any case, they prettyobviously didn’t take thequestion too seriously, whenthey brought it up to provenatural justice was done, bysaying it doesn’t exist as longas there are rules. And since itdoesn’t exist, it was compliedwith if the rules are followed.Or something like that. Theydid say that the phrase“natural justice” historicallymeant the same thing as “theWord of God.” So who’s toargue with the president,anyway.If the board didn’t take thisquestion seriously, can wetake anything they sayseriously. Maybe they shouldhave concluded that In thecase of administrationsGoede, Graft, and Jain, neverexisted? In the long run itwould probably have provedeasier to justify.The president said that thereport ‘‘speaks for itself.”certainly does.It

~arbitration committee ...IAdministrators are “nutd“~charges sasmended mrof.I Kirkby - ”my place is not at UVic.”IIISuspended Wic philosophyprofessor Ron Kirkby saidMonday that UVic’s administrators“are nuts” to tryto fire him.He added that heblame the presidentdid notfor theKirkby, speaking in atelephone interview fromVancouver, said this was “theuniversity’s challenge for meto damage it and for it todamage me” and that this was“just stupid”.Harbordto bedumped?The Alma Mater Society islooking for a new insurancecompany because of conflictof interest charge.Academic Affairs Chairman,Brian Greene, told theRepresentative AssemblySunday night that all AMsinsurance was handled byHarbord Insurance LM. whichis headed by Justin V. Harborda member of the Board ofGovernors.“I think there’s a conflict ofinterest,” said Greene, “withHarbord’s insurance handlingover S35,OOO of premiums lastyear. ”In an interview MondayAlma Mater President IanMcKinnon said that he didn’tfavour switching companies.“It’s a matter of institutionalpolicy to remainwith one insurance company”for a great many years, hesaid.McKinnon said he doubtedthere was conflict of interest,saying “As far as I know theUniversity of Victoria andAlma Mater Society has beengetting its insurance therelong before Harbord wasappointed to the board.”McKinnon said, however,that he couldn’t “rememberany discussion of conflict ofinterest” at the time Harbordwas appointed.suspension but blamed “theseGaddamnql people in thePhilosophy Department” andin particular “this characterRankin who seems to be intothis.”Kirkby was commenting ona confidential memo issued toall faculty and professinalstaff, received by the Martletat ten o’clock Monday morning,which officially announcedhis suspension.The memo from thepresident announced the institutionof dismissalproceedings against Kirkby aswell as his suspension.The reasons given in thememo were that “he (Kirkby)is ignoring and on severaloccasions has stated it is hisintention to ignore, thedepartmental decision not topermit him (i) to treat all hiscourses as mutually corequisite,(ii) to limitenrolment in these courses tonot more than some suchfigure as 25, and (iii) to incorporateworkshops ingestalt process learningwithin the required coursework.“Even supposing he shouldnow give a belated un-dertaking to comply with thedepartment’s decision, hisattempts last year to evadethe department’s evaluation@icy indicate that he cannotbe relied upon to abide bydepartmental decisions.Kirkby said he planned to“carry on business as usual”and would hold his first classon Tuesday at seven-thirty inSedgewick 125.He denied the charge,leveled by Mr. Partridge in aninterview with the Times lastweek, that he (Kirkby) “islooking for a confrontation”by planning to go ahead withhis classes with or withoutdepartmental support.“I’m not looking for one, Ijust want to be left alone toteach; if there’s a con-A 1frontation, it’s their con- future to hear both Kirkby’sfrontation.”and the department’s cases.Patridge said “we’ll take The committee will alsowhatever action is ap- consider professor Kirkby’spropriate at the time” if Kirk- two proposed compromises.by goes ahead with classes on One was for Kirkby to give hisuniversity property.proposed course of studiesAsked if he planned to outside the Philosophycontinue with the course even department, for instanceif he is dismissed, Kirkby said, through the office for con-“I’ll have to get a job.” tinuing education.“If they dismiss me, that’s The other was for Kirkby toit, the whole thing is over,” he be given a leave of absence,added.with six months pay, in orderKirkby was also asked, for him to carry out thesince he had said many times programme on a nocreditin the past that people around basis.here thought him insane, if he Both plans have beenwas insane.rejected by the ad-He replied with an emphatic ministration.“no”.The Martlet tried severalHe said, however, “my times to contact presidentplace is not at UVic”, because Partridge to find out what“I feel on that university action, if any, he planned tocampus absolutely out of stepwith everyone.”“I’m a teacher and a damngood one” Kirkby said, but nota teacher that works the sameway as the other members ofthe Philosophy Department.“If that makes me insaneokay, but I know I’ih not.”Kirkby lacks support, hesays, because “the faculty Idespise in general, there areexceptions, and they know it”and because the studentsknow “I’m opposed toeverything that they’ve beentaught, and they resent that.”Kirkby said he didn’t knowwhat kind of a chance he hadwith the arbitration committee.“Sometimes, in myoptimistic moments, I thinkabout 50-50.”“It’s a real Godsend they’re(the committee members) notfrom UVic,” he continued.The committee of arbitrationwas previouslyagreed upon by Mr. Partridgeand the president of theFaculty Association.It is composed of ProfessorDavid Humberman of theUBC law faculty, Dr. RolyLambert, an educationalpsychologist from theUniversity of Calgary, and Dr.Kenji Okuda of the Economicsand Commerce department ofSFU.It will meet in the nearKirkbyadmits‘insanity’Ron Kirkby is after all insane,the controversialphilosophy professor informedthe Martlet Tuesday.“I said ‘no’ yesterday -today I’m inclined stronglytoward yes”, said Kirkby.“Anyone’s insane who actson how he feels, and that’s theway I act.”“And since I’m having agood time, that makes mecrazy, I guess”, concludedKirkby.Usually reliable sourcesstated Tuesday that Mr. BruceJ. Partridge, president of theUniversity of Victoria, iscompletely sane.THE MARTLET, October 7.1871. Page 5... a Godsendcarry out when Dr. Kirkbywent ahead with his classes onthe wic campus.He was not reached,however, because he spent allday Monday in meetings.About eight students turnedup for Kirkby’s bannedphilosophy class Tuesdaynight, and drew only a warningfrom the administration.“Last night was the firsttime the people there began torelate to one another.” saidKirkby.“It showed we were on theright track .... we could’vedone remarkable thingstogether.” he added.Kirkby said he plans tocontinue with his classes onweekends and evenings.Meanwhile, the administrationremains quiet.SUB managerfinally chosenFinally, after more than amonth, a new Student Unionbusiness manager has beenappointed.Filling the vacancy createdwhen Bryan Clarke resignedin August, is David Titterton,30.After a lengthy delay to sortthrough the many applicantsfor the position the SUBManagemept Board finallychose Titterton.Initially informed of thevacancy by University exec.Trevor Matthews, Tittertonexpressed surprise at hisselection as he was the onlyapplicant without a universitydegree.Born in England, Tittertonmoved to Victoria at an earlyage and graduated fromMount Douglas High in 1958.He spent seven years in theold Victoria College on a C.A.program after which he joineda local firm of CharteredAccountants. Six years laterhe joined the Y.M.C.A. andhas been looking after theirfinancial affairs until now. Hewill begin working in the SUBon October 18.Titterton says that the SUBoperation is “along exactlythe same lines as the Y.”“My responsibilities arebusiness and finance - I amstrongly business oriented asit applies to non-profitorganisations.”Titterton was actively involvedin building the new Yand is looking forward to SUBexpansion.“I think that with the experienceI’ve got I can assistthe council in attaining theirobjectives.”About working for studentshe says, “it is intriguing - itrepresents a side of theuniversity in which I havenever been involved.”Titterton is married and hasone son. Motorcycle racing ishis favourite pastime. Heowns two motorcycles and istreasurer of the VictoriaMotorcycle Club.,J.

THE MARTLET. October 7, 1971. Page 6with. the worldgetting ready’ to blow itself up,look who’s minding the store.THE MOTION PICTUREDESIGNED TO SAVE THEWORLD FROM SANITYBirds, beesand other fablesby Norm WrightIt’s a nugatory worldTheIrlRDWOlWk~dCHI[.AILLOTKATHARINE HEPBURNYUL BRYNNERRICHARD CHAMBERLAINOSKAR HOMOLKACHARLES BOYEREDITH EVANSPAUL HEINREIDDONALD PLEASENCEDANNY KAYE2nd BIG FEATURETHE BLISSOF MRS.BLOSSOMwithShirley MacLaineRichard Attenboroughone show only - Fri. Oct. 87:Mp.m. - Elliot 168 (not Mac. 144)Students: 75cThe Sexual awakening of a young man at a most ungodly hour.THE NIGHT OWL SHOW0INrnLOR A SEVEN ARTS PICTURES RELEASENever trust an albino hypotherapist with a wooden leg.with PETER KASTNER, RIP TORN, KAREN BLACKsongs composed by JOHN B. SEBASTIANtwoshowingsat7:00&9:00-Mac.144-Students: 7%Saturday, October 9DAVID HOLZMAN’S DIARYand ORIENTAIONtwo mind-blowing films - Victoria Premieresoneshowat11:00-Mac.144-Sat.Oct.9Students: 35c General: $1.aNUGATORY: a. 1603. 1. Trifling, worthless. 2. of no force,invalid; useless, futile, inoperative 1605.The term nugatory is not one that we encounter daily.However it appears among wordy legalisms of the McLaurinReport, and specifically in that document’s rejection of theexternal tribunal proposed by CAUT.The report claims that an external tribunal would “makenugatory the powers of the Board of Governors under theterms of the Universities Act.” Now if you can manage toresist the impulse toagree heartily with definition one above,let us press on the the still live Kirkby case.Last Saturday’s Times contains the following statement,“The matter (sic Kirkby) now goes to the Committee ofArbitration previously agreed upon by the universitypresident and the president of the Faculty Association.”The committee as named consists of three academics, onefrom UBC, one from S.F.U., and one from the University ofCalgary. Naturally, I was horrified at the implications.“Another nugatory crime is about to be committed! ” I said,fearfully, to a friend.Upon investigation, however, it turns out that this is not anugatory plot after all. The pristine procedures of ourpedestrian prexy are not about to be pillaged by thosepowerful profs of the Faculty Association, no sir!You see this case is different, as if you hadn’t guessedalready. The Tenure Document provides that such an externalbody, called the “Standing Arbitration Committee”,will act on appeals in cases of dismissal. As an arbitrationbody its decision is apparently binding, at least that was theintention when the Tenure Document was signed by the BOG.“But surely this would ‘make nugatory the powers of theBoard . .. . etc.’ ” “No, Herman, because the courts havealready ruled that tenure documents do not constitute bindingcontracts in any case (SFU 1969)”.“But doesn’t that mean that there are no bindingprocedures at all?”“Not exactly, you see there is difference betweenprocedures and contracts.”Well then, who decides which procedures will be acceptedand which will be ignored?”“Why the President of course!”“But what if the Faculty didn’t ape with him, and invokedthe great spirit of CAUT?”“Well if the President got hassled too much, he wouldarrange for the full profs to ask for a Board of Enquiry to beset up by the Chief Justice.”“OK. then, who would be on the Presidents Board ofEnquiry?”“No, Herman, you’ve got to call it the Chid Justice’s Boardof Enquiry”.“OK, anyway who would be on the Board?’’“Well, lets see, first we would get a retired Chief Justicewho was also an ex-member of the Board of Governors, thenwe wou!d get some academic type who was a full-timeUniversity administrator ....”“Yes, yes, go on, go on”“. . .. then for the third member of the Board we would getthe brother of another University president who also happened to be a lawyer, and - yes that’s it - we would providethem with a real good lawyer as counsel, and - I’ve got it -he will also be a member of a Board of Governors! Thatshould do it!”“Boy that sure should! With a Board like that we couldmake nugatory anything in the whole darn world!”“Right on Herman!”“Yeah we can make McLaurin, Riedel, Carrothers andWilliams immortal.”“Right on Herman! ”CLASSIC CINEMATHE CABINET OF DR. CALlGARldir. Robert Weine (Silent) at 7: 15LES DEUX TIMIDESdir. Rene Clair.Students: 5oe general: 7%ALEXANDER NEVSKY’fHr. Sergei Eisenstein at 9:15atpdents: 75c general: $1

THE MARTLET, October 7, 1971, Page 7Vol. 11, Part I‘Lwoufromd you tellme, please, whieh way I ought to ganere?” asked Alice. That depends a good deaOf cabbageson where you want to get to,” said the Cat.kings and documentsThe Advisory Board reportin “the matter of Dr. Tikam C.Jain, Dr. William J. Goedeand Mr. John P. Graff” is apretentious but an inaccuratedocument, both in regard towhat it includes and what itleaves out. Its conclusions areexactly as they were expectedby a large number of people onboth sides of the dispute.However, some thought thatthe panel would examinecritically the role of theuniversity administration,especially that of PresidentPartridge, in last year’s crisisof non-renewal of appointments.For thesemembers of the universitycommunity even this smallexpectation turned out to becompletely false.The advisory panel hasaddressed its report to “theAssembly of Full Professorsand to the Board of Governorsof the University of Victoria.”This order of precedence isinteresting, and it. is obviouslyan attempt to signify theproposal of full professors ofthis university that recommendedthe establishment ofthe panel. In addition to thereference to the Board ofGovernors who appointed thepanel under section 53 of theUniversities Act, the inclusionof the august “Assembly ofFull Professors” is to addcreibility to the panel and itsreport for the academiccommunity in Canada andabroad. It raises a seriousquestion, however, withrespect to the role of the so-called “Assembly of FullProfessors” at this university.On what grounds can a groupof 26 Full Professors whovoted for the resolutionrecommending the panel beregarded as representative ofthe faculty at large? How cana group of five self-appointedfull professors who drafted thepanel resolution be regardedas representatives of andaccountable to the universityopinion, especially when someof them had a clear conflict ofinterest in the cases concerned?The Advisory Board takesrefuge behind section 53 of theUniversities Act to defend itslegitimacy as a non-bindingpanel, and it asserts that abinding tribunal would render“nugatory the present properfunction of the Board ofGovernors to make finaldetermination of such matters.”(p.44) This is a selfrighteousbut ’ very poorjustification of their position,especially in the light of thefact that the tenure documentprovides for the establishment,on an annd basis, of abinding arbitration of alldismissal cases under itssection 12, and it does notseem to have renderednugatory the present properfunction of the Board ofGovernors in the university.In fact the main purpose oftenure documents across theCanadian universities is topromote and protect, with theagreement of the universityBoards of Governors, the rightof self-government by theacademic community in allacademic matters. Theposition taken by the advisoryboard, therefore, on methodsof settlement of academicdisputes is entirely contrary tothis approach. It only vindicatesthe CAW view thatacademic boards alone’ arecompetent to settle matters ofacademic dispute such asappointment, promotion ortenure.But the advisory board isonly re-echoing whatPresident Partridge saidabout what was then theproposed panel in hismemorandum to all facultyand the professional staff,dated April 27, 1971: “Thisproposal differs markedlyfrom the CAUT recommendationwhich theUniversity has not foundacceptable. The CAUT wanteda tribunal, composed ofpersons from outside theUniversity, with one personpicked by each party, and achairman picked jointly, andit wanted the finding to bebinding. The University feelsthat it cannot and should notabrogate its responsibilities toan outside tribunal of thiskind. Such visiting committeesare difficult to constitutein the first place, andsince they do not have to livewith the consequences of theirrecommendation, they areunlikely to be sensitive to alltenurethe implications of the case.”And, “The inquiry which isproposed provides for a meansto determine whether anyindividual has suffered realinjustice; avoids the disadvantagesof CAUT’s travellingacademic committee; doesnot interfere with thisUniversity’s right to make itsown decisions; and, finally,can be accomodated to theprovisions of the TenureDocument.”It seems that the AdvisoryBoard had all the “disadvantages”of the CAUTproposal except one, and thatis, that it did not enjoy the .confidence of those whosecases it was established toexamine. It was a travellingcommittee but a nonacademiccommittee in itsmain composition. It was avisiting committee and, accordingto the above argumentof President Partridge, it doesnot have to live with theconsequences of its recommendations.This task it hasleft for us poor souls who mustremain in this delightfullysituated university.This leads to an importantpoint that requires somcexplanation and that is therole of the Chief Justice of theSupreme Court of BritishColumbia in the establishmentof the committee. Did heappoint the panel, or did henominate the panel, or, as thememo dated May 26 fromPresident Partridge says, didhe consent to suggest namesfor such a panel? It is not clearwhat exactly was the ChiefJustice asked to do regardingthe panel. What is clear is thefact that this panel had theblessings of only one side inthe dispute. Consultation withthe other side and appointmentof a joint committeewas entirely possiblewithin the terms of section 53JAN KADARCaner d BroadPION: 15-of the Universities Act. The appointed only after a longBoard of Governors of this period of prevarications oiuniversity . ignored this President Partridge that asppssibility and therefore they far as the “university” wasfailedin their moral obligation concerned the cases of Jainto make sure that justice was Goede and Graff were closed.not only done but that it seemto be done. This is all the moreregrettable because the ad hoc by a faculty memberadvisory board had beenMemorial throws outentire student councilThe students of MemorialUniversity, Newfoundland,ousted their entire studentcouncil in a referendum lastWednesday.The reactionary councilheaded by 34 year oldpresident Dave Rooney werefacing their second nonconfidencereferendum sincethey took office last spring.This time they could nolonger hold out againstcharges of patronage andcorruption. The final count inthe. referendum ballot was1,530 against the council withonly 895 supporting it.Students were concernedwith the close connectionsbetween council presidentRooney and the ProgressiveConservative Party within theprovincial government. Thstudent bureaucracy was run,opponents charged, bypatronage rather than bydemocratic means.The list of directors of thecouncil’s $8O,ooO Opportunitiesfor Youth program read like aroll-call of the councilexecutive and most payingjobs in the councilbureaucracy went to councilmembers or Rooney supporters.Rooney himself wasaccused by the Muse, theuniversity’s studentnewspaper, of taking a$1,500.00 salary as the OFYprogram director in additioto his $1,000.00 summepresidential salary.The date of a new electiolhas not yet been set buRooney has already confirmed the fact that will he norun. His opponents are askirqthemselves if perhaps he hahis eye on the provinciaelection to be called ilNewfoundland this fall.REGINALD STONEPresents :AN EVENING OFSILENT MOVIES.RUDOLPH VALENTINOIN“Blood and Sand”Plus :CHARLES CHAPLINAND LAUREL ANDHARDY.Musical Accompanimenton the COM Organ byReginald Stone.SATURDAY OCT.16th 8 P.M.NEWCOMBEAUDITORIUMALL SEATS 1.50AT DOORcdavid r. pepper -O P T O M E T R I S TSHELBOURNE PLAZA /VICTORIA, B.C. / PHONE 477-4711FRANCOISCorner ofBorad &BrouahtonTRUFFAUTS“BED AND BOARD”with Jean Pierre Laude Claude JadeFrench dialog with English Subtitles383-343424 hrs.Doors 6:45shows 7:Oo. 9:oo

THE MARTLET. October 7,1971, Page 8i%he was jast standing in the sun000 blood was all over the ground,'A young boy writes of a Pakistan refugee campwere ZI,& Enst h stnn eva- in men & were given a tint lothe camp wha! he arrived - 30,OOO whenhe left. m follaring is pert of a letterLqdn wrote d W experiences.sleep in. We were to sleep onthe surface of the earth on ajute mat. We all prepared toThen from far away, we sawsleep because we were tiredthe refugee camps of Darivid.by the jeep trip. But the newIt was 5.30 in the evening.place didn't know us, so weWhen we got out of the jeep, itcouldn't sleep. Everybodywas strange for me to lay my,tried to sleep, but all in vain.feet on plain earth again. ThenSo that night was spent just inwe had tea and we were taken k..:."Llylly.to walk about the camp bysome Fathers who are Thenext day we were givenworking there. Everything I works by Fathers, group bysaw in the camp was different group. I was to go with Philipand strange tc~ me. Some, .~ to visit every family of the -.refugee camp. It was a verydifficult task for we know onlythree or four words of Bengali,so could hardly talk withthem. We could understandmost of their language, but wecouldn't say much. Though itwas very difficult, we weretrying our best.While visiting every family,I could see something differentin each one. Some werecooking and others wereeating. From this I realizedthat they had no fixed time formeals. Then I thought: why isthis? I found out the answer.They had no fixed timebecause some had lots offirewood and some did not;some had many to do work,some had only one old or weakperson. Then I saw that someshelters had bamboo sticks,side had only a roof. Then weasked about this. We came toknow that the governmentmade only the roof; the sideswere made by the refugeeswho could make them. Sothere was nothing good for theweak, old people.Some families were veryclean, some were very dirty.At first I was very angry withthe dirty people; but then I

THEMARTLET, October 7, 1971, Page 10'STARTS TODAYAthletics referendumunderstand it'he present fees collected for use of AMS activity take the form of a $26.00 General Fee anda $6.00Athletic Fee. Are you in favour of re-allocating the $6.00fee into:(a) a $4.00 fee to be allocated between intramural and extramural athletics,(b) a $2.00 fee to be allocated to Academic Affairs for the purpose of developingacademic programs and that this fee be under the supervision of the AMstreasurer.AMi THAT this reallocation take effect at the earliest date 1971-1972 or at the latest, 1972,1973 of the Academic Year.YOU WILL VOTE:YES IF YOU AGREE WITH THIS SPLITNO IF YOU DISAGREE WITH THIS SPLITvee.~7.00-9.00at-Cont. 1 p.m.Ill-DOorS15 p.m.Starring Timothy BottomsJason RobardsL?onald SIItherland363-0S13%MI VAT&*"1".ameWarning: FrequentSwearing: Could beDisturbing for some-B.C. DircetWNO EXIT AND PIGEONSNo Exit and Pigeons will be performedin the Phoenix Theatre by an all studentcast starting tonite at 8:OO p.m. Ticketswill be on sale at the theatre tmxdfice.The plays will continue on Oct. 8, 9, 14,15, and 16.FREE TRIP TO SPAIN.Interested? How? Come to the Spanishclub meeting at 12:M p.m. in the Sub'sClubroom A.PRE-LIBRARY SCHOOL CLUBThe first meeting of the Pre-LibrarySchool Club will be held in the upperstaff lounge on the 4th floor of theLibrary at 4:W p.m. Everyone interestedin a library career is welcometo attend.FILMJohn Ford's Stagecoach will be shownin the Lansdowm dining room at 8 p.m.The movie stars John and is regarded asa basic Western movie.'Admission 5Oc(College members 4Oc).mLIBERAL CLUBThe Liberal Club will hold areorganizational meeting at 12:M in theSub boardroom.LIBERAL ARTS 305"The Paradox of Knowledge: Socratesand Oedipus" by Dr. Peter Smith(Classics) in Elliot 168 at 1:W p.m.OUR ENVIRONMENT"Sewage Disposal" will be the topic oftonites show on Channel 10 Cablevisionat 7:30 p.m.BIOLOGY CLUBre: WAR GAMES CLUB - GentlemenAdvenhvers clubOr the old War Games Club. Firstmeeting will be held at 12% in the SUBupper lounge. The plapose will be toelect officers: make arrangements forthe second mure Hunt and our firstwar. AU those signed up on clubs Dayplease come plus all those interested.For further information contact RobertMcDougPll or Michael Farr.CHRISTIAN SCIENCEORGANIZATIONThe Christian Science Organization at12:W in Craig. 206. Thin room is alsoopen Tuesday and Thursday from 1i:mto 2:W for the study of. or questionsabout, Christian Science. Everyone iswelcome to attend.BADMINTON LZUBThe Badminton Club meets in the Gymfrom 8 to 11 p.m. AU students arewelcome.UNITED APPEAL AUCTIONThe united appeal Auction beingspMlsored by the Victoria Jaycwes willbe held tonite at 7:M p.m. in the Baystreet Armories.WHAT HAS:7-9 p.m. Thursday, there will be ageneral meeting of the Wic Thew&(Karate) club in the SUB upper loungeA9 interested persons are invited.95 horsepowertwin S.U. carburetors5 main bearingsa full syncromesh gearboxfront disc brakesrack and pinion steering0 radial tires0 mag wheels0 head rests8 leather - rim steering wheelALLAS STANDARD EQUIPMENT?-A NEW MGB FROM $3375.00VANCOUVER ISLAND'S LARGEST SPORTS CAR DEALER1010 YATESICUI wanted to share rooms onebedroomapartment. Excellent location.$Ui/ mo. 3854163 after 10:M p.m.Furnished cottage and duplex for rent.Quiet waterfront location. 18 miles westof Victoria (Sodre). Phone 642-5731.Room and board to Norwegian speakingstudent. Fleasonable rate in return forlanguage instruction. Ph. 479a54.Honda CL - Bo 1989 model, excellentcondition $2.50. Please phone 4774452.FOR SALE: 2 one-way tickets toEurope, Victoria to London direct, forthe low price of $120 each. Phone Sylviaat 311g3630.PIONEER@STEREO COMPONENTSYOUNG'S AUDIO DEPARTMENT794 FORT AT BLANSHARD 382-5512I JUNCTION BOOKS587 JOHNSONPaperbacks -Records - Hardcovers - ComicsBOUGHT - SOLD - EXCHANGEDLarge Selection of Posters383-0633

THE MARTLET, October 7, 1971, Page 11by Linda FlavelleUpper C1ass.P.E. JOCKETTES took the Ladies POWDER-PUFF SOCCER crown with a 2-2-0 record for games playedin the September 29th tournament.The action in that event was beyond description but one hasto credit the gals with taking a simple sport like soccer andturning it into absolute chaos.SCORES FROM WEDNESDAY'S ACTION WERE:JOCKETTES tied MAGGIE NEWTONS 0-0.KATHIES KIDDIES over MAGGIE NEWTONS 1-0.JOCKETTES tied GRANNY GRADS 1-1.GRANNY GRADS over MAGGIE NEWTONS 2-0.U.VIC. ENDOMORPHS over MAGGIE NEWTONS 1-0.ENDOMORPHS tied GRANNY GRADS 0-0.JOCKETTES over ENDOMORPHS 14.JOCKETTES over KATHIES KIDDIES 1-0.GRANNY GRADS tied KATHIES KIDDIES KATHIESKIDDIES over ENDOMORPHS 1-0.FINAL RESULTS FOR THE TOURNAMENT WERE:1. JOCKE'ITES - Upper Class P.E..2. KATHIES KIDDIES - Craigdarroch College; GRANNYGRADS - Upper Class P.E. (Class of 1972).4. U.VIC. ENDOMORPHS - Upper Class P.E.5. MAGGIE NEWTONS - Craigdarroch College.Flag Football nuts are still hard at it - entering the thirdweek of action.WIC Rugby MAINLINERS were the standouts in Wednesdaysaction, winning both games with rather impressivemargins. The MAINLINERS overtook the UNDERDOGS 33-6and finished off the SASQUATCHES with a close 324 victory. IAbout all that could be done in retaliation was to stompMAINLINER Joe Scuby who will be watching the actionfrom the sidelines this week with an injured ankle. "Scub"learned the hard way that getting in the way of a MaeDepartment UNDERDOG is taking your life in your hands.SCORES FROM WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 29th' WERE:MAINLINERS over UNDERDOGS 33-6.TASSEL SEEKERS over GO-NADDS by default.MAINLINERS over SASQUATCHES 324.GRIM REAPERS over STONY AND HIS FRIENDS bydefault.GRIM REAPERS over J.C.'s 190.FACULTY FLIPS over GO-NADDS by default.MONDAY OCTOBER 4th:GRIM REAPERS over SASQUATCHES 274.TASSEL SEEKERS over. STONY AND HIS FRIENDS bydefault.FACULTY FLIPS over J.C.'s by default.FACULTY FLIPS over STONY AND HIS FRIENDS bydefault.SASQUATCHES over FACULTY FLIPS 19-18.The draw for the final night of league play before the topteams advance to play-offs October 13, 18, and 20 is asfollows:MONDAY OCTOBER 11GAME 1: SASQUATCHES vs FACULTY FLIPS (Field 1);GRIM REAPERS vs TASSEL SEEKERS (Field 2).GAME 2: MAINLINERS vs STONY AND HIS FRIENDS(Field 1); J.C.'s vs UNDERDOGS (Field 2).FLOORHOCKEY LEAGUESLADIES: OCTOBER 14,21, (7:30 to10:OO P.M.) OCTOBER28 (750 to 9:OO P.M.).MEN: OCTOBER 28 (9:OO to 11:OO P.M.) NOVEMBER 4,18, 25, DECEMBER 2 ( 79 to 11:OO P.M.).-All games played at the UVic GYMNASIUM."Entries due: Ladies - Oct. 12. Student Council Office.Men - October 25. Student Union Building.NO LATE ENTRIES WILL BE ACCEPTED!!!!! !!____OAK BAYViks flattenedin prairiesThe UVic rugby Vikings nolonger have any doubts aboutthe calibre of rugby inAlberta.University of Calgary edgedthe visiting B.C. Champions29-5 and the University of,Alberta, Edmonton,, stoppedany thoughts of revenue inUVic minds by running a goodtry at the end of the game toadd five more points to theireighteen penalty points (23-16).There were moments in thefirst game in Calgary whenthe Vikings showed some oftheir old flair. They startedthe second half nine pointsdown on penalty goals whenRobert Hindson started a longrunning movement thatfinished with Tony Dufficyscoring and converting Wic'sone try. But the last twentyminutes of the game provedthat the Calgary Stags, whoare just finishing a twenty fivegame season, were in muchbetter shape as they piled onthe points and the UVicdefence slowly crumbledunder their relentless punding.The Calgary Stags are ratedthe top team in Albertaalthough they had lost theirlast game to Edmonton 9-8.UVic played well against theGolden Bears, but every timeWic scored a try the Bears'fly-half from Scotland, Mr.Jim Hamilton, would kick twolong penalty goals. The leadchanged hands three timesduring the game, but again the"end of season fitness" of the Stockers, perhaps the beAlberta side seemed to come intermediate team on tlthrough at the end of the Island, were however largegame. Gary Johnston, Steve outplayed by UVic.Thompson, Rick Dade, and Uvic goals were scored tTony Dufficy could not getContinued on Page 12quite enough points to puttheir team over the top.An annual exchange betweenUVic and the twoAlberta Universities wouldappear to be of mutual advantageto all three schools.The Alberta sides claimed thegames with UVic were thebest of their season.HockeysquadswinlessLast Wednesday's intersquad game showed coachHowie Conty some verypromising material.The Blues defeated theWhites 2-1 on goals from DaveCousins, while Dave Metcalfe,a newcomer from the localarea scored for Whites.Thursday night Vikings losta close game to Stockers 7 - 5.Vikings, ahead most of thegame faltered near the enddue to several mistakes frominexperienced players.L====2-.fashionboutiqueWhere the unusualis the usual.Open daily10 A.M. to 5:30 P.M.1320 Gov't. St.Phone 383-0931TURNTABLES?A FREE LID WITH EVERY PURCHASEYOUNG'S AUDIO DEPARTMEN7794 FORT AT BLANSHARD 382-5512IMOUNTDOUGLAS BARBERSHOP4101 Shelbourne St.Two blocks North of K-Mart.r\ DFDICATCD TDCLEAN AIR$46,500Near the University and just waiting for that large executivefamily - 6 bedrooms; 4 bathrooms. granite Swedish fireplace:many, many extra features; just 7 years old. Apts. to view -Mrs. F. Mauger, 598-5062 or 384-8001.BROADVIEW PROPERTIES LTD.1039 JOHNSON STREET 0 VICTORIA, B.C.

THE MARTLET, October 7, ml, Page 12:erry Oscarson (21, Daveitapleford, Dave Metcalfe andlave Cousins.To complete a full threelays of action, Norsemen onrriday, began their VanlouverIsland Hockey Leagueday, by dropping a 4-1lecision to CFB Esquimalt.Despite outshooting theirIpponents 32 - 20, Norsemenvere unable to put the pucklway more than once.Again lack of experiencevas partly to blame, and thisan only be remedied underlame conditions.This weekend Norsemenravel to Chemainus to take onhe dirty Blues while Vikings,est up until next Thursdayvhen they take on theItockers again at George’earkes Arena.yiks goodon grassOn a rain soaked Windsor’ark field last Sunday, UVicrikings defeated Castaways 2-to move into second place inhe Vancouver Island Men’sield Hockey League.Playing short handed, theCOaUnued from Page 11Vikings neverthelessdominated the game overtheir less experienced opponents with exceptional playfrom Fraser McColl, StevenLane and. Gordon Radcliffe.Laurie Builivant and Lanescored the Viking goals.Valkyri.esdownedValkyries went down to a 4-1defeat at the hands ofMariners last Saturday atGordon Head, despite sterlingperformances by LesterHome and Sharon Mackie,ana a goal from JanetWilliams.Next weekend, onthe 9th,10th and 11th October bothMen’s and Women’s FieldHockey enthusiasts will betaking part in the Jamboree atRoyal Athletic Park.Bays edgerngger NorseRUGBYNorsemen lost a closeexhibition game to Oak Bay atCRAIGDARROCH COLLEGEFORMAL ‘NOV. 19DANCE - SMORGASBORG- FLOOR SHOW4.00 per coupleWindsor on Saturday.The 13-6 score belied theimprovement in the Norsemenperformance from the weekbefore.Despite the fact that severalof their number accompaniedthe Vikings to Calgary, theNorsemen had ablereplacements.In a game dominated byhard running and open fieldplay, the Norsemen defenceand hard tackling is especially.worthy of mention.The smaller UVic packcovered well and the back linebroke up most of the Oak Bayattacks.Chris Spicer and Reg Hoolewere standouts in the for-wards, while Colin Cafferleyand Dwg Pettman who kicked2 penalties are worth mentionin the backs.Oak Bay pointswere earned by Bruce Howeon a try, and Bob Oughtred, ona Penalty kick, a try, and aconvert. Colin Cafferky andDoug Pettman completedpenalty kicks for the Norsemen.The UVic fifteen were incontrol of the action during theopening minutes, but wereoutplayed by the stronger OakBay squad for the remainderof the match. Norsemengame will surely lead tovictory.Soceer:RunnersoutdistancedVikings soundly defeatedRoad Runners in a rain soakedfield at Heywood last Sunday.The score was 4-0 but shotsfrom Dave Barraclough, JohnReier and Mike Sailes hit thewoodwork.Brian Barraclough hit thehat trick with his three welltaken goals and set up thefourth for Steve Bridgeman.Vikings are so far undefeatedin 5 games thisseason, having scored 26 goalsfor the loss of only two.Presently top of the VancouverIsland League theyplay Vic West next Sunday.Check yourfind out where.NorsemenNorsemen lost 1-0local paper toto,Prospect Lake despite thevaliant efforts of Marly Crossin the midfield. The scorewhile not indicative showed upthe fact that Norsemen mustlearn to put the ball in the net.Auctionfor AppealA United Appeal Auction,being sponso+ by the VictoriaJaycees, will be held atthe Bay Street ArmoriesOctober 13th commencing at7:30 p.m.Starting October 4th pick-ups for merchandisewill beavailable by telephoning 38&4333 24 hours per day.v,v,w,wiressovietsThe Victoria Voice ofWomen today (September30th) sent the followingtelegram to the Soviet embassyin Ottawa concerningthe U.S.S.R.’s latest nucleartest :WE STRONGLY PROTESTU.S.S.R.’S RECENT UN-DERGROUND NUCLEARTEST, WHICH SHOWEDCONTEMPTUOUSDISREGARD OF PEOPLES’HOPES FOR TEST BANTHROUGH S.A.L.T. TALKSNOW PROGRESSING, ANDFOR THEIR FEARS OFRADIOACTIVE POLLUTIONTHREAT TO FUTUREGENERATIONS.I I COMPLETE ON PREMISES REPALRSIElectric eye1006 BROAD ST. 386-0333INTRAMURALFLOORHOCKEY LEAGUESLADIES:w. 14 & 21(7~30- 1O:OO P.M. )OCT. 28(7:30 - 9:oO P.M.)ENTRIES DUEOCT. 12thSTUDENT COUNCILOFFICE, S.U.B.MEN:OCT. 28(9:OO to 11 :00 P.M. )NOVEMBER 4, 18, 25,DEC. 2(7:30 to 11:OO P.M. )ENTRIES DUEOCT. 25thSTUDENT COUNCILOFFICE, S.U.B.FORM A TEAM AND ENTER EARLY(no late entries will be accepted)QKENWOODSTEREO COMPONENTSYOUNG’S AUDIO DEPARTMENT794 FORT AT BLANSHARD 382-5512o anic n m sgrains - flours - breadcereals - nuts - seedsdried fruit“ juices - honeyraw milk - cheese & yogurtfreth’produce - cooking oilsmacrobiotic products

THE MARTLET, October 7, 1971. Page 13letters.~.more...lettersContinued from Page 4really cool that we, a smalluniversity on the edge of thecountry, can take on and beatthe rest of the country in anumber of sports. My desire,however, is to have the wholeidea of Athletics andRecreation given a higherpriority, and hence, to obtainmore money for programmeoperation. But there is no wayit will be if the students don’twant it. Rather than forcingthe administration to take upthe cost of Athletics, I feel thatthe referendum, if it is passed,will show that the studentsplace a low priority onAthletics and Recreation.Our illustrious ClubsDirector, who incidentallydidn’t even appear at the clubsmeeting on Monday night,seems to think that moremoney will come out of thisreferendum for AthleticClubs. For a start, he will haveno control over how it isallocated, merely a voice anda vote, and even if it does go tothe clubs, there is noguarantee where it will gonext year.To mention ethics for aminute - the Athleticprogramme has,.been set upfor this year in anticipationthat the students will honortheir financial committments,and the Administration willhonor theirs. Coaches havebeen hired, schedules, dates,and bookings have been setup, and equipment has beenbought. If either party was toback out of their committmentfor this year, at this late date,I would call that a seriousbreech of ethics.Finally, in a survey made atthe time of the referendum in1969-70 concerning athletics, itwas noted that the averagestudent contribution toAthletics on campuses acrossCanada was $14.00. It is only$6.00 here. Athletics are notonly for the active participant,they are also for the spectator.’I feel that students would bebetter placed to ask whathappens to the rest of the$32.00 A.M.S. fee - does thatbring as much benefit to anindividual student per dollaras an Athletic andRecreational programme? Ithink not.Linda FlavelleElec. MemberEd. 3Correet meif I’m wrongSirs :I have heard that there is tobe a referendum to lower theathletics portion of the A.M.S.fees from $6 to $4. This wouldlower the extra mural sportsportion from $4 to $2 - effectivelyending almost allextramural sports, as theadministration would nolonger kick in their matchinggrant. (Please correct me if Iam wrong). This would cut theextra mural athletics budgetby 2/ 3. Should wecut outpractically all extra muralathletics - just to pay for aguest lecturer for the few thatwould use him?SignedKen GreeneSki Team Coach3rd yr. GeographyYou arewe will(Ed. note: The athleticsreferendum has nothing to dowith the Goede one. Who saidit did?)MeKinnonon feeRe: The Athletic FeeReferendum, Oct. 12, 1971.Once again, the age oldeconomic problem of limitedresources and unlimiteddesires has presented itself inthe form of a referendumconcerning the Athletic Fee,now a $6.00 addition to your$26.00 Alma Mater SocietyFee. On Tuesday, October 12,during the balloting for theRepresentative AssemblyElections, each of you, as amember of the A.M.S., willhave the opportunity toparticipate in the decision asto the amount of money thatthe athletic program at UVicwill receive in 1972-73. Youwill vote “yes” or “no” to thereallocation of the six dollarfee, a reallocation to hediscussed in more detailshortly.It is my intention at thistime to inform you of the factsof this situation and leave youto draw your own conclusionsfrom the material offered inmy presentation. I feel that Ican give you a unique view ofthe situation not only from myposition as President of theA.M.S., hut also by virtue ofthe fact that for the past fivemonths, I have acted as theInterim Extra-MuralAthletics Chairman and I havegathered the relevantmaterial in an attempt to doboth of these jobs well for yourSociety. With this in mindthen, let me continue.Prior to the academic year1968-69, the Alma MaterSociety Fee was $30.00 peryear. Of this amount, thebudgetted allotment for theexpanding athletics programwas $3.70. (It is a point to benoted at this time that theCanadian national averagewas $14h per student.) In1969, the students on thiscampus realized that tocontinue to have a viableInter-Collegiate and Intra-Mural program’ at theUniversity of Victoria, aseparate and enlargedAthletic Fee was necessary.This was determined by areferendum that placed theA.M.S. Fee at $26.00 perstudent per year with anadditional $6.00 to be collectedfor athletics. To offset this netincrease of $2.00, your StudentIdentity Card has acted as afree pass to all athletic func-tions participated in by theUniversity of Victoria. Thishas heen the arrangementsince the academic year 1969-70.It should also he noted thatwhen the student body madethis committment to theathletic program on campus.the UVic administration alsomade a very strong committment.Not only did theUniversity agree to match thestudent Contribution dollar fordollar, hut it agreed to absorbas much again in administrativecosts incurred bythe program such as coaches’travel expenses, payment of aDirector of Athletics,secretaries, honoraria forcoaches and managers, ad-vertising, and a multitude ofother expenses intrinsic in theoperation of a sound program.With such a forceful committment from the‘universitycommunity, the athleticprogram at UVic has not onlyexpanded hut improved itscalibre and its merit to theUniversity of Victoria. So, inlight of this brief historicaloutline, let’s look at thecurrent problem which faceseach of you now.It is the expressed wish ofsome students on campus toreallocate the $6.00 collectedspecifically for athletics. Sucha move would entail reapportionment so that $2.00would be directed to extra-mural athletics, $2.00 would bedirected to intra-muralathletics, and the remaining$2.00 would be added to the$26.00 A.M.S. Fee, earmarkedContinued on Page 15

~~ ~~ ~~~rITHE MARTLET, October 7,1971, Page 14Attend an OrganizationalTHURS. OCT. 14Meeting ofVICTORIAWOMEN’S7 P.M. CAUCUSCLUBROOM *‘A**!!-YOUR CAMPUSTRAVEL AGENTSUNIVERSITY HEIGHTSSHOPPING CENTRE477-1811RICHARD’S RECORD SHOP720 Yates Passage 383-273:WITH THE LOWEST$3*l REGULAR PRICES $476IN VICTORIAOpen Thurs. and Fri. ’til 9PURPLE ONIONPRESENTSEVERY SAT. 10:30 P.M.TILL 3 A.M.VERSATILE ROCKSOUNDTHIS WEEK’S FEATURETee - Bag1037 View St.For information 386-0011A.M.S. Cards for Door Special)WTOSHIBASTEREOYOUNG’S AUDIO DEPARTMENT’ 794 FORT AT BIANSHARD 382-5512 I.Riot rates jumpUnderwriters uneasyThe Canadian UnderwritersAssociation (CUA) is increasinguniversity vandalismand riot insurance rates by asmuch as 100 percent. In additionthey are imposingdeductible amounts of up to$50,000.00 per claim onuniversity building fire losses.The insurance companiesjustify their increases byciting such example as:1) the growing record of.student unrest at UBC,Simon Fraser, Universityof Windsor, WaterlooLutheran, McGill and SirGeorge Williams.2) recent bomb damage atMcGill, Loyola and St.Francis Xavier3) radical and inflamatoryspeeches made onuniversity campuses (inthis case they areoperating on the theorythat all serious studentdemonstrations can bedirectly related to theactions of one rabblerouser. )University officials are up inarms against the newpremiums but their efforts, itwould seem, are to no avail.Roy Elms of CUA, thelargest organization of fireinsurance companies inCanada expresses his beliefthat the new premiums wil“encourage university officialsto accept moreresponsibility in controllinglosses at the SOuTce.”This means that within thepolitical and economicframework of Canadianuniversities big business,through insurance economics,can gain some control ofuniversity politics by makingstudent radicalism too expensivea cross for theuniversities to bear.Universities have alwaysbeen easy marks for the insurancesharks and Canadianuniversities in particular weregood investments for insurersuntil February 1969 whenCOMPONENTSmilitant students and Mon- situation does not warrartreal police, using the Sir higher premiums.George Williams University University administratorComputer Centre as a battle seem to find it easier to switcground, turned it into a $2 insurance companies than tmillion heap of scrap metal. : squash student discontenThe insurance companies took adwn to a level acceptable tthis loss with ill grace and “set CUA.about scheming ways to retainthe healthy capital flow fromthe universities’ coffers to itsown. Their solution? Highriot premiums and highdeductibles.University insurancebuyers, who are beingpenalized under the newsystem feel that the insurancecompanies are overeacting toa few isolated incidents andare allowing themselves to beoverly influenced by recentinsurance policies adopted byAmerican university insurers.They are now suggesting,rather belatedly, a counterproposal.A spokesman for Marsh andMcLeMan Ltd. of Toronto, aleading broker of universityinsurance, says that theuniversities and insuranceagencies should have heldmeetings to discuss bettercampus securityarrangements, more realisticdeduction provisions andother improvements on theri$ involved.This comes a bit latehowever as the CUA hasalready unilaterally made itsdecision and is in a position tostick to its guns as it is thecompany with the most experienceon Canadian campuses.CUA is prepared tonegotiate deductibles but onlywith universities with hugeinsurance budgets and longpeaceful histories.Many universities are nowdeciding to insure with non-CUA companies, or to take acombination of CUA and non-CUA policies. However theystill feel that it is their duty tostrengthen their own campussecurity and that they shouldnot be penalized if their ownPortions of the Advisory Board’s report onthe matter of Jain, Goede & Graff will bebroadcast next Monday, Wednesday, andFriday at 7:OO.SURELY YOU CAN FIND FIVE MINUTESIT’S IMPORTANT- IT CONCERNS YOUMARTLETWpL!T;hURShynight at 4: 30- be .there 1RAIN or SHINEWE’VEGOTTHEBLUESCITY OR COUNTRYBLACK OR WHITEREALFOLKBLUESME RECORD GALLERYMIDTOWN MALL730 VIEW ST.PHONE 383-5131EMMANUEL BAPTIST(at UVic Main Entrance)SUNDAY AT 9:30 a.m. : 11:OO a.m. : 7:OO p.m.STUDENTS’ SUPPER at 5 p.m.

Few turn out to discusrdepartment grievance#Only four students showedup at a meeting of English 120students Monday night held todiscuss the shifting of instructorsoriginally scheduledfor 120 classes to sections of110.The meeting was called sothat 120 students who wereupset over their classesdoubling in size as a result ofthe move could vent theirgrievances.Grant McOrmond, thedirector of Freshman English,told the gathering that theproblem really wasn’t “allthat bad”, despite the fact itleft “nobody very happy.”McOrmond told the studentsthat average class size ofEnglish 120 was 29, “which byuniversity standards isn’treally all that bad”.“However”, he added, “itdoesn’t work out that way dueto timetable conflicts”.“Twenty-nine is still toolarge to have gooddiscussions”, one studentreplied.McOrmond also said thatbe largest 120 class had 42itudents, not 60 as reportedast week.The average size 110 class is!2 students.McOrmond agreed whenluestioned that much of thewoblem of overcrowding in‘irst year courses is due to theEnglish department’s tenlencyin recent years to in-crease the number of assistantand associate professors whileleaving the number of instructorslargely, stationary.As a result there are severalupper level courses with onlythree or four students, taughtby senior faculty drawingsalaries varying from two tothree times that of instructors.“We can hire people aslecturers,” McOrmond said,“but the problem is thatthey’re pressured to becomespecialists. If they stay aslecturers (without workingtowards higher degrees)they’re fired after a fewyears”.McOrmond said higher‘ faculty members regard theteaching of 110, a remedialcomposition course, as “anassault on their integrity,their virginity, and whateverelse”.“The people who mostlyteach it” he said, “areCanadians who have come upthrough the system. Someonefrom the British system forinstance simply can’t understandthe need for such acourse”.McOrmond also stated thathe thought the “publish orperish’’ syndrome practisedat UVic to be “directly opposedto the principles ofeducation”. He cited the caseof one faculty member whotold his class they wouldn’t seemuch of him this year becausr“he was going to publish”.McOrmond agreedsomewhat sadly that thalinstructor would likely keephis job, while admitting thalseveral fine teachers whchadn’t been interested inpublishing had been let go inrecent years.The most exciting part 01the meeting came’when onestudent told McOrmond hewas keeping on a con.versational level.“You aren’t doing anythingabout it”, the student said.McOrmond replied that hespent a great deal of timehelping students, time, hesaid, (drawing a giggle fromthe Martlet staffer) that moslof his colleagues spent“furthering themselves byreading”.The meeting petered oulabout an hour after it started.with McOrmond promising tcswitch the four students intcsmaller sections of 120..“I’ve done this for one bo)who was very upset ancunhappy, and I’d do it for anyboy or girl who came to seeme”, he said smiling.Everyone left happily, savefor two suspected radicalswho sat in the hall for almostan hour after, discussinggestalt therapy, the Need forRevolution in modern society,and where Illtydd and Seanhad gone to.Assembly sends protestto Times, ColonistA letter protesting of The Victoria Daily Times!overage, by the downtown and The Daily Colonist overmpers, of affairs at Wic their handling of the recentlyluring the past year has been published McLaurin Report,!ndorsed by the Represen- both from a news and anative Assembly.editorial viewpoint. We areThe letter, written by especially disappointed thatCxecutive Member Derry both newspapers haveKcDonnell, received a slim suggested that only “exnajority,passing by a vote of tremists” and “malcontents”iix to five last Sunday. could possibly question itsPresident Ian MCKiMOn, impartiality. We feel that suchwe of those in opposition to a view is not only inconsistentmdorsing the letter, said with the opinion of theKonday that the last sentence, majority of faculty andvhich spoke of a “low con- students at the university, but;piracy”, was “a little bit is also, quite simply, atnuch.”variance with establishedMcKinnon said “I don’t facts as well.hink we should be telling The following relevanthem (downtown press) what points have all appeared in;o print.”your publications prior to the“We don’t send letters to the release of the report;. ourMartlet,” he said.question now, is why have youMcKinnon said he felt both chosen to ignore them since?he Victoria Daily Times and 1) The idea of an outside3lonist gave fair, objective tribunal to mediate theand “extensive” coverage to tenure dispute did nothe university scene.originate either with the“Papers have more to do President of the Universityhan put on low grade con- or with its Board of,piracy against the univer- Governors, but was, in,ity,” said McKinnon.fact, first proposed by theMcDonnell, however, CAUT in February, 1971.lisagreed with McKinnon, as 2) The university steadlidthe majority of the RA fastly resisted all attemptsnembers present at Sunday’s at objective mediationneeting.until its own ad hocThe letter read:assembly of full professors>ear Sirs:concurred, and recom-The Alma Mater Society ofmended that a tribunal behe University of Victoriachosen by the Chiefvishes to express its deepJustice.3)msternation to the publishersEven so. the ChiefJustice ala not actuallychoose the final tribunal,but merely provided theBord of Governors with alist of names, from whichit made its own selection.4) All salaries and expensesincurred by the tribunal.members during theirperiod of investigationwere paid for exclusivelyby the Board of Governors.5) In protest of the arbitrationprocedures beingused, neither the threedefendants nor the CAUTpresented evidence at theinquiry, (with the exceptionof one letter fromDr. Tikam Jain).It is incredible to us,therefore, that the findings ofthese three men, selected andemployed by the Board ofGovernors, and based on-onlyhalf the evidence, can bepresumed, or worse, construedto be impartial.However, if the public afterexamination of all therelevant facts can still reachsuch a conclusion, that is onething ; but for both localnewspapers to ignore andwithhold such evidence frompublic view smacks of a lowconspiracy.Yours truly,RepresentativeAssembly,Alma Mater Society,University of Victoria.P.S. We trust that at the veryleast you will print this letteron your editorial page.letters...more...letterssolely for Academic Affairs.What does this mean foryour athletic program? In aword, “disaster!”. Let meexplain.A $2.00 per student grant toextra-mural or intercollegiateathletics wouldeliminate most of the- teamsbecause to divide this moneybetween all the teams wouldnot give them enough to existand so the money would, out ofnecessity, be allocated tothose teams obligated tocompete with other universities.Even atthis rate, manyteams would be forced to foldand the University of Victoriawould lose its status of anassociate member in theWestern Canadian Inter-collegiate AthleticAssociation, the only suchprogram in Western Canada.Next, the intra-muralquestion. Contrary to themistaken belief of somestudents at UVic, the intramuralprogram does notrequire additional funds to itscurrent $3000.00 budget. Whatthe program does need,though, is more people participating!The allotment ofalmost $lO,OOO.OO proposed bythis referendum could not beused efficiently on a campusthe size of UVic. This positionhas been clearly and continuouslyenunciated by yourIntra-Mural Athletic Chairman,Linda Flavelle, holder ofthis elected position for thepast two years. So, I repeat,the additional thousands ofdollars are unnecessary andwould not benefit the intramuralprogram at this time.Thirdly, the question of anallotment of $2.00 per studentto the department ofAcademic Affairs, managedby an elected member of theA.M.S. Executive Council.Unfortunately, there has beena tendency for the moniesallocated to this department tohe used in a somewhat dubiousmanner, though, fortunately,not intentionally. While thisdepartment has brought manygood speakers to theuniversity, it has also sponsoredsome rather ethicallyquestionable “Symposia” thatturned into low-grade orgies.Last year this practice washalted! With regard to thebringing of speakers tocampus, it has always beenthe wish of the members of theRepresentative Assembly atbudget time in October toprovide monies for speakersunder the auspices of theAcademic Affairs Committee.1 am sure that this wouldcontinue tp be the case in theFuture, even without an in-:rease in fees. Regarding theDther areas of this department,it is the consideredDpinion of most students at‘JVic that the squandering oftudent funds on functions thatnvolve such a minute per-Lentage of the studentopulace, such as Symposia,md I use this term extremelyightly,‘ in the light of pastIxperience, is most distateful.Finally, you have probablypard of the new Athletics:omplex that has finallyeached the top of theDiversity priority list. Thelans for this centre are in theinal stages and await only thecontinued from Page 13funds for construction. Thi!complex will be of im.measurable utility to a1students who wish to use itNeedless tQ say, that if istudent referendum to CUIathletics is successful, seriousreconsideration will takrplace and the new buildingwill again be just a beautifuldream, occupying a lowlyplace on “The List”.In conclusion, I can onlypoint out that you will have tomake the decision on thisproposed reallocation and youwill have to face the consequencesor benefits thatarise from your decision.Please consider all of thepossibilities and think of whateach will mean, not only to youin your brief stay on campus,but also to the future of theUniversity of Victoria.Thank you for your considerationof this matter. Nowit is up to you. Please come outto vote and determine wherethe priorities of the AlmaMater Society and theUniversity of Victoria shall bein the coming year.Submitted by:Ian J. McKinnon, 688113,President,Alma Mater Society,University of Victoria.Soulson soilDear Sir:We have an acreage of soilwhich is free of herbicides andpesticides, and which is fertilizedwith natural manures.Having cleared the groundourselves, we know the soil isas uncontaminated aspossible.We are producingvegetables which are excellentin flavour.In order to continueproducing, we must expand toa more economical size. Forthis we require a relativelycertain market.We propose to issue shareswhich would be redeemed (inkind, with 7 percent interestper annum) over a three yearperiod. Shareholders would beentitled to purchasevegetables at a priceestablished at the beginning ofthe year and reviewed annually.Money received fromshares is to be used for seeds,seaweed, capital costs forexpansion and some hiredlabour.We suggest thatshareholders form a cooperative.The functions ofthis co+p could be:to negotiate prices yearly;to appoint a committeewhich would inspect the farmsinvolved ;to ensure the quality of theproduction;to arbitrate any complaints;to educate members and thepublic about quality food.The same co*p could alsopurchase bulk supplies fromhealth food distributors, oreven from general wholesaleoutlets for those members whowere interested.During the next stage of thedevelopment of our farm, wecould supply a maximum of 50continued on Page 16

THE MARTLET, Oetokr 7, 1971, Page 16.Mary, mysticalexciting playSomewhit lost in the furorsurrounding Marat Sade isan exciting and unusual experimentby a smaller UVictheatre company.Company One, an improvisatorytroupe composedmainly of UVic theatrestudents under the direction ofCarl Hare, performed theirproduction of Mary beforeonly four people last Thursdaynight. They deserved muchbetter.Mary, based on the story ofMary Magdelene, is a newconcept of theatrit, fallingsomewhere betweentraditional theatre and purelyimprovisational drama. Theplayers begin with the basicstory and structure in mind,and then develop and alter thescenes as they go throughthem. As a result, theproductions change fromnight to night.“We get together after eachperformance”, one member ofthe cast said, “and discusswhat we would like to see donedifferently and then incorporateit into the play. Wealso talk to members of theaudience and see what theyliked and didn’t like, andadjust accordingly.”The production is simpleand inexpensive, relying oningenuity rather than lavishsettings for effect. The stage isa bare wooden room, lit onlyby flashlights and electrictorches placed on the floor.Costumes are a uniform grey,consisting mainly of capes andshawls and body stockings.Despite the almost starksimplicity, the effect of theplay is surprisingly varied.The general tone of the play istortured and nightmarish, butat times it attains a ratherlyrical beauty. Often thestarkness directly increasesthe play’s effectiveness,giving it an elemental qualitythat would be difficult toobtain with the most expensiveof fixtures.My only complaint about theproductionthenight I saw itwas that the final reconciliationof Mary with Christafter his resurrection was abit too abrupt, and thereforeseemed to lack sufficientmotivation. But perhaps thisis the twentieth centuryanalytical mind attempting todisect what, if it occurred atall. must indeed have been amiracle.The overall tone of the playis deeply mystical. The scenesinvolving group therapydialogues and scholarlydiscussions only serve tounderline the inadequacy of arational approach to thedeeply emotional experiencepresented on the stage.Mary will be alternatedthroughout the winter withNight Play, a comedy.Home base for the companyis St. George’s Church Hall onMaynard St. in Cordova Bay,although productions areoccasionally staged in otherareas. The group left earlierthis week on a tour of schoolsand halls up-Island, and willgo to the mainland nextmonth.In a city in which brilliantsettings, extravagentcostumes, and oratoricalacting cannot quite mask thelack of originality of con-ception in most productions(not Marat Sade), Companyhe is a most welcome addition.by Doug Rowletters...more...lettersfamilies. Later we woulaexpeet to establish a grower’scooperative to supply food tomore families and perhapsoffer a greater variety ofproduce.We also invite inquiriesfrom people who wish to beinvolved in growing things.Mr. and Mrs. J.H. Dickman4744 Rocky Point Road,R.R. 1, Victoria, B.C.- 418-3126peculiardecisionsSir :One of the terms of theMcLaurin commission ispeculiarly at variance with itscontents. This term ofreference was to determinewhether or not the threeprofessors received treatmentconsonent with the principlesof natural justice. In essence,the commission decided thatnatural justice was subordinateto the requirements ofadministrative law, but thatnatural justice had been doneanyway. The commissionmade its decision on the basisthat procedures as describedin the tenure document hadbeen followed and thereforethe men had been treatedaccording to the princples ofnatural justice.What has always beenquestioned by those peoplefollowing the three caseshas not been the formalprecedures followed, but thecontent of the procedures andthe correctness (not the legalvalidity) of the finaljudgements made. It hasContinued from Page 15happened many times in thepast that correct procedureshave culminated in a wrongjudgement or even inillegitimate act. Is it reallytenable to maintain that ifcorrect procedures arefollowed even to a wrongjudgement, that naturaljustice has been done?Many people are not convincedthe cqmmission reportproperly demonstrates thatthe correct judgement wasmade, and for them certainquestions remain unanswered:Why was Dr. Goede judgednot on the basis of hisscholarship, teaching andservice on University committeesbut on the basis of hisalleged immaturity and“passions”? Why was hejudged on the basis of Dr.Leslie’s conjecture instead ofon the basis of performance?Why was Mr. Graff judged noton the basis of his colleagues’and department head’sestimate of his performanceas a teacher of lower andupper level courses, but on thebasis of Dean Climenhaga’sformal standards? Why wasDr. Jain’s dispute with theChemistry department notreferred to an extrauniversitypanel of academicreferees, the constitution ofwhich could have beendetermined to the satisfactionof the parties involved, insteadof to a prestigious“anonymous” outside organicchemist? Who was thischemist and why did he chooseto remain anonymous? Is itnatural justice to be judged bythose who will not identifythemselves?F y was the final realjudgement made by someonewho is neither a scholar nor anacademic? Is it natural justiceto be judged by an improperlyqualified judge?None of these questionswere discussed or answeredadequately by the Commissionof Inquiry. In fact, farfrom illuminating thesequestions, the Commissionreport obscured them. TheCommission a lot morewhitewash than is needed forthree sepulchres.Frank WalltjAmchitka2Dear Sir:There are a couple of thingscoming up that might be ofinterest to some of the peopleon campus.A protest of some sort isbeing planned by Amchitka 2for October 22 in Vancouver.We feel that this is a goodopportunity for us to show ouropposition to nuclear testingby the U.S.S.R., since PermierKosygin is slated to be inVancouver at that time.It would be just great if wecould get enough people interestedin going over tocharter at least 1 bus, orbetter still 2 or 3 buses. If youare interested in going toVancouver, please phone 592-0527 or come to our nextmeeting, Wednesday October13, at 8:OO p.m. in St. John’sChurch (corner of Mason &Quadra ).If you are concerned aboutnuclear testing by anybody,anywhere for any reason,please join us and becomeactive in the movementtoward the cessation of allnuclear testing.Yours In Struggle,Inez St. Dennis

iTHE MARTLET, Octobcr 7. 1971. Page 17

THE MARTLET, October 7. 1971. Page 18Senate:DerryMeDonellWell, well ! Here is thatbrash young man who said hewas through with liberaldemocraticprocess, outrunning for Senate. SENATEby God ! The most ponderouscollection of democraticliberals this side of theVatican. Has he sold out?Been co-opted? Seen theLight? Or - - wait a minute! - student interest in the senate.he’s infiltrating the At various times in the pastOrganization, that’s what he’sdoing! Gad, the mind boggles!Who is this Derry McDonell,and why LS he saying thosethings about himself?Well I’m sorry that peoplethis year seem to be turningaway from their responsibilities,especially since theyappear to be substituting themwith the pursuit of pleasure.One could almost forgive thetendency if there was a greatrush to the library to catch upon our studies, but that is notwhat Is happening at all.No, what is happening ishat we are allowing ourselvest3 be overtaken by a huge tideof morose, embittered apathy.Apathy in any form is badsnough, but this is aickeningly self-righteous- p x ’ j which openly resentsany .! xmpt to stir it intoaction.Well come on now people.All that has happened is thatwe have learned a great lessonabout life in general, andlaeallsm m-pzimi- mesort of lesson that the U.S.learned in Vietnam, and whichdon’t keep themselves up toall men must learn date on Senate business, andsomewhere on the road tomaturity -that you can’t getare comparatively less informed,and the reason maythe mountain off your back be that the Senate is an insimplyby willing it so ; but you timidating place to saycan’t learn to ignore it either, anything. Whatever theand trying to do so, the way we reason, the kind of voice thatare now, is nothing less than students have on Senate hasmass regression to thumb- been less than forceful, andsucking and blue blanket thus ineffective.seturity.I believe I can be effectiveIf that’s, what we want - as a student senator. I knowfine - but that choice makes itpretty hard to deny the chargethat it wasn’t the idealism atall, but the pretty placardsand the rah-rah meetings thatinterested us most.I believe‘in representing thestudents as well; I only hopethat the students I would berepresenting would be in-terested students, because Iam interested ... I wouldn’t berunning otherwise.BrianAlgaireThe position and duties ofthe student representative onthe university senate ’ isessentially to acquaint himselfwith the general opinion of thestudent body on variousmatters ’ ranging from administrativeprocedure toacademic curriculum, and to,present these views to thesenate’s attention. As studentsenator- then, we needsomeone whom we know willexpress; what he honestlybelieves is your sentiment,andnot use this responsible Iposition< as a vehicle for his .D W ~ interest.The senate is the main linkbetween the student body andthe administration, andprimarily through it can weexpect to gain needed changeson this campus. Studentrallies and demonstrationsare fine in a limited respect,but they alone have provedunsuccessful. Strong, studentbackedrepresentation in thesenate could gain moreresults.I have long held an interestin campus politics, but themain outlet {or such interest isthe RA, a consistantly ineffectivebody. I believe I ambetter able to serve thethree years I have worked onthe Martlet staff, been amember of the activitiescouncil, and played on andmanaged an extramuralViking team.If elected, I pledge to serveyour interests as I believethem to be; not to be intimidatedby minoritypressure, nor be overwhelmedby petty disputes.In closing Iurge all of you to vote onTuesday, whether you supportme or not. Should I be electedhowever, your confidencewould not be misplaced.BobHiginbothamSince the first studentsenators were elected fouryears ago, there has been oneconsistency in the behaviourof all succeeding studentsenators. They have beenTomtsmtty si!m In senate.The reason may be that theythe way in which decisions aremade in this university, and Iknew where and by whom. Iam not reluctant to state mycase forcefully, because I amconfident that I can state mycase coherently.I don’t believe that the roleof a student senator is to actwithout constituency; that is,once elected to sit as an independentmember of Senate.This is what some members offaculty and most of the administrationbelieve is theproper role of a senator, anykind of senator, but I disagree.Student senators areresponsible to those that electthem, and therefore mustmake the strongest possiblecase from their own specialperspective. I don’t believestudent senators shouldcompromise an inch from aposition that puts studentsfirst. Why? Because we haveonly two representatives outof about three dozen, and thestudent case can easily bedisregarded unless made inthe strongest possible way bythe only members of Senatewho really understandstudents, the studentsthemselves.My past experience of involvementin student anduniversity affairs is fairly throats for the sake of theirsubstantial. I have served own pet projects. My mainseveral times over the past interest is Athletics but I amfour years as a member of anxious to serve in anystudent council, edited the capacity which promotes theAcademic Guidebook (first interests of- UVic students.year); edited the Martlet,(last year) ; served briefly asa member of both the En-2nd yeartrance Requirements andStandards committee and the reps:Academic Planning committee,(both Senate Com-Davemittees) ; served as a studentnegotiator of the Need for ClimenhagaChange brief; and as amember of the steeringThe reason I’m running iscommittee last year, was abecause I’m sick of theprime conspirator in the antibullshit.Not the generalyartridge movement, abullshit that comes from theconspiracy later joined byHare Krishnas, the Youngalmost every student at theSocialists, and the like; overuniversity and the majority ofthe past two years I’vefaculty. I am presentlybecome rather fond of that,studying philosophy andbut the specific bullshit thatworking as an academicflows from the offices of theassistant.presidents of this place.I don’t like the things that1st yearIan McKinnon, the presidentof the AMS is doing to thisreps:place and I especially don’tRonlike the things that Mr. BrucePartridge, UVic’s otherpresident, is doing.Vote for me and help meFrederickmake Ian’s life difficult andBruce’s life sheer hell.It has been my experiencethat persons seeking anypublic office usuallyplatform on what “they”think should be done; only toturn around and do what theyGillian-Paghare told to do by the powersabove.This is to be a short sum-I believe that I can listen! mary of my platform. It is“I don’t take no shit from no however difficult to say in aone! ”few words what one would likeI might possibly represent to accomplish at thisthe awe-inspiring apathy of university in a whole year.the invisible 2,500 students One area in which I know I canwho share my views.help is that of athletics and IRemember the name - am asking for your support inbeyond time and patience - this matter. To me a veryit’s all I have.important aspect of aFrederick IS first year! ! university is its recreationprogram. I cannot see UVicwithout a field hockey,ElaineTandbergI would like to make clearthat in running for thisposition I am not representingany particular party, andstand for what I feel willbenefit the majority ofstudents.In my opinionthe presentreferendum, regarding the cutin athletic funds is a drasticmove presented without informingthe students of theinevitable results. That is,without the full six dollarsfrom the AMs fees, ALL extramuralswill fold; UVic willbe “blacklisted”, as anathletic competitor, with otheruniversities.I am running to furtherinvestigate exactly whereAMs funds go, and have a sayin matters concerning ourmoney.BrianWrightAs a candidate for electionto the R.A. as a First yearrepresentative, I have severalreasons for running. Not theleast of these is my belief thatit is high time that studentpoliticians began to work forthe things students reallywant and spend a little lesstime cutting each othersbasketball, ice hockey orsoccer team, or without arugby club. However as the2,000 of you who participatedin intramural sports last yearcan attest these teams are notthe total scope of thisprogram. I would like to insureathletics remains a vitalpart of this university. If youshare this feeling I can onlyurge you to go to the polls onOct. and vote so that thisyear the R.A. is trulyrepresentative of you thestudents of UVic.MikeWallaceIs your Pocketbook lagging,Is your Libido flagging,When you wake in themorningAre the hairs io your earssaggingDoes your prof alwayscommentOn your frequent dozin.When you try to speak,Is your pharynx suddenlyfrozen.When they choose up sidesAre you always last chosen.If you have experienced anyof the above vote for me andwe’ll wipe out this nonsense. Itcouldn’t hurt!KenLittleMy platform is guided bythe series of bullshit the mostof the candidates have, aselaborately and as ingeniouslyas possible, put down as theirpossible motives for runningfor the R.A.They are based on three“ups”: (1) Up-SUB expansion,(2) Up-Sportsreferendum, (3) Up-BillWe; and three “Downs”:( 1) Down - Young SocialistSlate, (2) Down - IanMcKinnon, (3) Down - BrucePartridge.RogerPainterSince brevity is considered,to my way of thinking, ofgreater value than longwinded exertations andconsiderable B.S. I will makethis clear-and concise1. Last year I was elected tothe position of speaker of theR.A.2. If reelected I wil continuein that position.3. My main concern hasalways been for clubs,athletics and activities.4. Student employment isanother great problem which Iam concerned with.5. Students got screwed inthe tenure dispute, andsomething must be done.All I can offer is to continueto do my job as speaker and touse reasonable judgement inrepresenting the students.FriedaLockhartI hate reading campaignspeeches but .I hate writingthem even more. Usuallythey’re pretty- dull, so I considerednot submitting thispreamble to the Martlet but Iguess the publicity isn’t goingto hurt.Someone asked me todayabout my platforms. There’snot much around yet to take astand on, mainly just therehash and continuation oflast year’s problems. But I seethe young Socialists havepresented their slate on theirpostbrs and there’s a few ofthese demands that I takeissue with. (By the way, youmight want to replace yourposter on the side ofClearihue, the paint ran in therain ).Abolish tuition fees? That’sa really great idea but wemight as well abolish ourbeloved (sic) university whilewe’re at it. UVic tuition feesare among the lowest on theContinent. The gov’ts. notgoing to pay our way, theycan’t even finance a medicalfaculty. Of course we couldalways raise the school tax afew hundred percent.Guaranteed jobs ongraduation? Beautiful thoughtbut idealistic. Lets give a B.C.grad a cushy job whilethousands of people with yearsof skilled work experience arestill on welfare. Women’s

‘THE MARTLET, October 7, 1971, Page 19studies on campus? Not of thegreatest priority around here.Maybe Dr. Goede would like toteach a course?Lets see, my own platform. Ihave to keep this to 250 wordsor less, and this thing is gettingharder to write; I think Ineed a coffee. I’d like anenlarged SUB, but beingnaturally pecuniary consciousI don’t want the AMS feesraised for the purpose. This iscalled having your cake et-c.. . . .Lets keep the trees aroundhere and ban more parkinglots. I like skylarks too.Campus developers are youlistening? I’d like to see aswimining pool on campusand, semi-serious, aregistrar’s office that doesn’trequire a minor hike to get to.Lets have third world studycourses, we need them andlets make the R.A. somethingmore than a perenniallyfashionable joke (fat chance!!). There’s lots of otherimportant things I want done,changed, stamped out, etc.,but I can’t think of them at themoment. In order to follow thetraditional closing pattern Istate: Elect me to the R.A. Ieven promise to go to themeetings.JohnBentleySince the conception of theR.A., it has very rarely, ifever, been truly representative.As I have long held, thesole duty of any representativeis to reflect the will ofthe majority. If elected, it wilnot be my purpose to act formy benefit but for yours. So,instead of the customarycampaign promises, I presenta few questions for you toponder as you vote.Does it seem that thepromises made by certainpolitical elements are at allpossible? Do these promisesreflect an unrealistic andoverly idealistic view of life?Do we need Bill -de? IShe worth an extra dollar? Nowthat Partridge .has (unfortunately)beaten us,doesn’t this whole businessserve to remind one of thesenseless emotionalism andimmaturity which havecharacterized previousstudent governments?Does the fact that the incumbentR.A. has ., curtailedthe practise of reimbursingR.A. candidates forczmpaign expenses s ck ofunfair class discrim&%? Itwas claimed that ca n$$@used the money for s ushfunds”, but doesn’t the R.A.tself send “good membersmck east all expenses paid?Do we need to spend $6.00)er capita on athletics?Jertainly mtiny studentsmjoy sports through paricipation,but are there manypectators?If you vote with your headmd not with your heart andhopefully) elect me, perhapswether we can prevent thislampus from becoming evennore absurd.3rd yearand above:StevePorterI find that I am tempted touse this space to further abusethat scourilous scoundrel BigBird who continues to featherhis nest in the President’sOffice (not to mention anynames), but the’subject is aBore. So I won’t.Instead the Issues asdeemed important by thatWily Fox, myself, will beexpounded herein.NEVER MIND THE SUB,LET’S EXPAND THE PUBThe odds against SUB expansionactually getting underway within the next two yearsare staggering - take myword for it. But how about Pubexpansion? All that needs tobe done is to extend the Pubinto the lower courtyard. Itwill be done anyway when theSUB is expanded so why wait?This would give us a largercafeteria, too.Speaking of cafeterias, whynot have a natural food cafe?It would be a wholesomechange from the usual fare .,.Also, a few fruit trees aroundthe SUB would be a welcomeaddition, especially aroundthis time of year.Just for the record, if theSUB expansion controversyarises again (and we all knowit will) I am totally in favourof more office and loungespace and, of course a .biggerPub. But I would like to see theauditorium idea come to grief.My most important issue isa perennial one which won’t besolved easily. That is, studentparticipation on Universitycommittees and in the Senate.I do not propose a democraticcampus simply because suchan obvious solution is stillconsidered undesirable bynearly everybody. I thinkmost will agree, however, thatopportunities for studentinvolvement are inadequate,especially when consideringthe size of this interest group.Therefore, I will campaign forParity with other campusinterests as a very optimisticyet reasonable goal - particularlyfor the Senate.These are the goals that Iwill be working towards as aMartlet Staffer, as a memberof a Senate standing committeeand, if elected, as amember of the R.A. So Votefor me.DaveMickFeliow students, candidates,and any interestedpeoples.It is with a definite goal, aprecise ambition, a concreteabstract aim, a movingmotive, and a damn goodreason that I am running in anelection to represent manypeople I do not even know or”who know me only through theetching .upon this rag or theverbulisations of my speechechoing amongst the walls andbuilding and heads of thiscampus. My initial goal, mypremiere ambition is to winand win I shall. Defeat shallnot darken my doorway norshall victory blind me to myaims.The benefit received by myconstituents shall forever,shine as an eternal beacon tofuture R.A. candidates.For my part, I shall fight inhallways and in the stairs, inthe classrooms and on thegrounds, I shall never resignand I shall never surrender.Never have so few asked somany for so much.JohnSchmuckI’ve decided to run for theR.A. in the hope of providingsome reasonable representationfor the students on thiscampus. A few things I’d liketo see are:-a prominent and qualifiedCanadian appointed aspresident of this university.- the organization of activitieswhich will include agreater number of students.- a new plan for SUB expansionwhich will provide abigger and better pub, a largeauditorium, and facilitieswhich will benefit ali students.Please support me, and I’lldo my best for you.SueMartensAs a third year candidatefor election to theRepresentative Assembly Iwill say in all honesty that Iam in favor of a strongAthletic program, both Intraand Extramural, on ourcampus. I further support thefight for a P.E. / RecreationComplex (pool, gym, etc) for Iknow it will serve the growingneeds of all students forrecreation suited to theirvaried needs and interests. Ifelected, I will endeavor tokeep my eyes and ears open tothe other wishes and needs ofstudents as well, since it hasalways been my contentionthat no program is worth theeffort if it doesn’t have thesupport of the students.DaveMcGregar -Let me makz myself perfectlyclear - I am runningfor the R.A. In my mind, if Iam not elected, - Oct. 12,1971shall live forever as a day ofinfamy. To be elected torepresent those in dire need ofrepresentation is my fondestdream. Seriously, I supportAthletics - all forms - but Ishall give myself to any causewhich strikes my fancy for thebetterment of student-hood. Ifyou elect me - I will go intothe assembly swinging. I, likethe well trained linebackerwill tackle the problem at theline of scrimmage. There is noplace for ineffective tactics inthe R.A. and as a member ofthe team - I will do my best tochange the game strategy. Iam a progressive, and I playtowin.Makeno mistake - IAM A Candidate.JoanDavisIn the beginning there was acollege and it came to passthat the board of governorslooked across the campus andsaid “Let there be a universityand let there be students whoshould have domain over theuniversity and that theyshould eat of the fruit of thecampus and be plentiful andtheyshould multiply” But inthe university, there sprangevil in the form of studentthought and tempted studentsto think for themselves saying“There lurketh in the B of G,unclean thought and that, youshalt go forth and think foryourself and you shall be asequals.” But the B of G sawwhat was happening as theysayeth unto the students “Goforth and bring unto yourselfan offering, maketh it 4 and 4and you shall call them theR.A. and they shall yearly,offer themselves up as appeasementto you” and itcame to pass that the R.A. wasformed in the image of the B ofG and that it became just asthe B of G. Yea, though I offermyselfup as sacrifice I sayunto you, let there be light so Imay make it through thevalleyIanBairdI suppose it is time to put outthe usual bullshit about howconcerned we all are aboutUVic .This university must takethe prize for stupidity andapathy. Taking apathy forexample, look at the ModelParliament results, 451students voted out of anenrolment of approximately5,000. It’s really good to seesuch student awareness!Bill Goede, the professorwho has been denied tenure,has now been offered aposition by AMs at a salary ofone dollar per student. What abloody waste of money!-If they must spend thismoney why not create an AMsstudent loan fund?Another bone of contentionis the SubPub. Why shouldstudents pay $1 to $1.50. If thatis not inflation what is? Thepub is for the students andshould he operated at cost.Furthermore the Pub shouldhe run and managed bystudents only not by nonstudentswho like to perpetuatetheir own heirarchy.As you vote think on thesepoints. Maybe you can getbetter value for your $32.PatThompsonI have known Pat Thompsonfor almost a year now and I’mimpressed with what I’velearned.I find her to be one of thosewomen who are truly‘liberated’; I mean that sheaccepts her independence andher intelligence gracefully,and with a style so naturalthat it doesn’t need to beproclaimed in speeches orworn on buttons.I believe that if she were tobe elected to the R.A. shewould be a welcome ex-ception. Most women who sitin the Assembly seem to feelintimidated by the malepredominance: they don’texpress their views openly,and on any major issue theyinvariahly ‘take their cue’from the prevailing side. Thisis truly unfortunate in ‘an agein which women have supposedlyachieved intellectualemancipation.Pat Thompson would breakthis tradition, and God knows,the R.A. could use the changeshe’d create in doing so.I like Pat Thompson. Pleasevote for her.- contributed by DerryMcDonell.AlastairMurdoaihThe main purpose of theR.A. is to set the policies of theAMs, and what one considersimportant is clearly shown bywhether one is prepared to putone’s money where one’smouth is. If we really want tohave an effective studentunion, we have to be sure thatour Administrative Officersare and remain the best wecan find. In order to elect thebest (and not just the well todo) in the first place, we needto offer sufficienthonorariums to the AdministrativeOfficers so thatthose who wish to hold office(:an afford t.0 do so (sincebeing an AdministrativeOfficer doesn’t leave time tohold a part-time job). In orderto assure that those in officeremain the best, we need aneffective means of removingthose who turn bad during theyear. One uay to accomplishthis is outlined in the proposedamendment to. the constitution,and I urge you tovote for it.One of the most importantpolicy making meetings of theR.A. is the budget meeting. Atthe present time more than $20of the $32 AMS fee has priorcommitments (for SUB ex- Ipansion, athletics, etc.). 1believe the remaining moheysshould be allocated as follows :Academic Affairs $1.80tts,ooo)Club $1.80 G9,OOo)Publications $1.50 ($7,500)

THE MARTLET, October 7,1971, Page #IActivities $1.00 C#,OOo)External Affairs $1.00(t5,OOo)Honorariums $1.40($7,000)Of course, if the AthleticFunds referendum passes, wewill have an additional $2.00 tospend, IC of which should go toAcademic Affairs, and Y4 eachto Clubs and Activities.Finally, let me state that mygeneral feelings on policy aresimilar to those of RussellFreethy, and therefore ingeneral I am not a supporterof Mr. McKinnon.NimbySihotaI was approached by severalfriends to run as 4th year rep.for the H.A. Until this time Ihave been an apatheticstudent towards the politicalaffairs of this university, butrecent development haveencouraged me to want toparticipate in the decisionmaking affairs for the studentbody.LoisFlavelleAs one athletic supporter toanother I turn to you, myfellow students, to decide uponmy fate, my future and myfortune. I beg of you, I plead,that you should raise up in amighty turhult and elect me torepresent your anguishingsouls and send me, likeDaniel, into the lions’ den ofthe R.A. and I shall comeforth, like Shad-rak out of thevery jaws of hell, unscathed,untarnished and undefeated. Ishall come forth with victorylike Jonah came forth fromithe whalp. Verily, verily, I say’unto you, ask not what the RAcan do for you, but what youcan do to your R.A. Let uspray.JohnEldridgeI served on student’s councilthree years ago, asa memberof the R.A. and ExecutiveCouncil. I sponsored an extensiveprogram of highschool and community appearancesby large numbersof students.I also served on the JointFaculty / Student Committeesestablished by Senate to lookinto the reforms which wereinstituted by Senate under thetitle of “Need for change”.I believe my experience oncouncil and working withFaculty has given me thebasis to take an informed partin Student Affairs on Campus.I intend to work particularlyfor the extended developmentand improved operation of thepresent Sub to accomodate agreater variety of services toall students.I wil seek appointment asStudent rep on at least onemajor Senate Committee,preferably Academic Affairs.I believe that the presentitudent leadership from Mr.McKinnon is both incompetentand inadequate, and I will tryto improve the effectiveness ofthe R.A. in taking its properplace as the responsible policymaking body.FionaGowThis university has fallenupon Hard Times. The GreatExpectations of the studentswishing to regain a ParadiseLost have resulted in a constantflux between War andPeace and in the ravages ofCrime and Punishment.A campaign which wouldappeal to Everyman andwhich would evoke the Senseand Sensibility of even theUnderground Man would, inthis Wasteland of Pride andPrejudice, be a ModestProposal indeed.I do not claim to have asolution which would satisfythe diverse needs of all thestudents on campus but I dopromise to deal conscientiouslywith all issuesand to try to resolve them withdue consideration of all thefacts.DougEvansI am running for the R.A. asa 3rd year representative foronly one reason: I believe thatthe only way to get anythingaccomplished at university isto do it myself.Thusly I hope to see allstudent activities run moreefficiently so that all studentinterests can be effectivelyrepresented.I pledge, with my heartbrimming with sincerity to dosomething (anything) for you. .. . if elected that is.Yours “Jock”ingly- BradZi.n kPurpose: to re-orientate theRepresentative Assembly as abody responsible to thestudents.Background: Member of theRepresentative Assembly andthe Executive Council lastsession. Academic AffairsCommittee. English Union.Involvement in studentpolitics for the last 4 years.Worked on the development ofthe Day Care Center.While realizing theRepresentative Assembly isirrelevant, this is simply aresult of the irrational andillogical ideas and informationking disseminated. Thp egotripof power becomes muchmore obscene when studentstry to react to the arbitraryacts uf faculty as evidenced insome of the various departmentslast year and arestopped by the bureaucratichypocracy of junior administration.BobCoulterOnce again I find myselffaced with the task of puttingmy thoughts about theRepresentative Assembly,and UVic in general, into ablurb of a few sentences. Thelast time I ran for council thetask was much more difficultbecause I did not really understandthe machinery ofstudent politics, especiallythose which exist at the SUB.During my last year on theR.A., and the past three yearswhich I have sat on the SUBManagement Board, I believeI have learned how the“political system” at thisuniversity works. My positionon council, if elected, will be ofan independant. If you wantan independant voice oncouncil I would appreciateyour vote. I would also en-courage you to vote for Derryand Bob in their bid forSenate.Extramuralschairman:KenLandeenMy Platform? An excellentquestion.This “statement”, Iimagine, is for the expresspurpose of answering thisquestion. So my answer -Athletics; in particular extramurals.And thanks to LindaFlavelle and others who aresupporting my nomination.Yo So S Slate1st year Reps.Loren LeaderCliff Mack2nd Year Reps.Laurie MacBrideBob GrantChffs HofstrandStudent Council electionsare here aee again, and asusual, they are surroundedwith the * same fog ofirrelevance and stupidity thatclings to every meeting of theR.A. Not that the A. has to beirrelevant or obscure, but thatmost of the people in it orrunning for it have chosen tomake it that way. They are thepersonalities on campus whoare trying to outwit, or outjokeeach other on the way torepresentingfive-thousandother students. They are theones who have continued thetradition of student govern-.ment in Canada - thetradition of playhouse politics,squabbling, and name -smearing. Past turnouts at theballot-box have indicatedquite accurately how muchthis means to the averagestudent - who is supposed tobe “apathetic” and“hopeless”, but who is actuallyjust plain bored. Thestudents on this campus, thesame as those in otheruniversities across Canada,have more important things toworry about - like how you’regoing to get through somecrummy course, or put upwith a lousy prof., like howyou’re going to buy all thehodrs you need when your lastpair of jeans just gave out; orhow you’re going to land astudent-loan or get a job nextsummer so you have the“privelege” of coming back.These are the real problems,the real issues on campus -this is what a studentgovernment which proclaimsitself representative of thestudents must be concernedwith; this is why the YoungSocialists have advanced boththeir program and slate forthe coming elections.(1) University Resources tothe Anti-War MovementA lot of people on campus,including the R.A., think thatthe war in Vietnam is nothingmore than a moral issue thathas been overworked and isnow irrelevant. It, in fact, ismuch more than this - it is amatter of dollars and cents toevery student on campus, andmore to the ones that couldn’tafford to come here; it is amatter of inadequateuniversity expenditure whichhas resulted in crowdedclassrooms and poor studentfacilities. Ever wonder whyclasses are bigger this yearand yet enrollment is down?The inflation and unemploymentwhich has causedthese problems - problemswhich affect every student oncampus -come directly fromour governments policy ofaiding and abetting U.S.imperialism in S.E. Asia. Thisis why the R.A. mustmobilize students to protestthe war on Nov. 3, with otherstudents right across Canada.This is why student governmentmust organize personnelad resources on this campus tobuild the InternationalDay of Protest. It is not amatter of choice, or of what“value judgements” are involved- it is a matter ofeconomic necessity that ourgovernment end its complicityin the war. TWs will come onlyif the students, with thewomen and workers 3f thiscountry, say NO to war policyand a war-inflated economy.(2) Women’s Studies onCampusIt is grossly obvious that theeducation system plays a keyrole in maintaining the oppressionof women - an oppressionwhich includes denialof the most basic democraticright of control of their ownbodies. Women are taught thatthey are the second, “weaker”sex, and that their role in lifeis tobecome the servile appendageof some man, and tobear and raise “his” children.Women, in fact, have notalways played this role. Theywere once, as a sex, buildersand leaders of civilization;they played an equal or evensuperior role in society withmen, and lost it only with theadvant of a class socialstructure.In the last 150 yearswomen all over the world havebeen fighting to regain theirrights as people and as humanbeings. The history ofwomens’. past and of theirstruggles must be taught itthis university is to proclaimitself an institution of higher“learning”. The R.A. mustlead actions on the campuswhich will ensure that womenstudents here have the right tolearn the history of their ownsex.(3) Abolish Tuition Fees(4) Guaranteed Jobs on.GraduationIt is no joke, orexaggeration, that themajority of youth are denied auniversity education throughlack of funds to pay for it, andthat the people who arereaping the real benefits ofthis education are the largecorporations and businesses.At an ever increasing rate,today’s graduate students arefinding themselves as nothingmore than skilled employees,if, in fact, they are fortunateenough to get jobs. This is whythe big businesses of theprovince and country must becharged with the cost oftraining their futui-e workers-- not other workers orstudents. They must pay thetuition , and residence fees;they must buy the books -they can afford it, we cannot.Furthermore, if a person hastaken the trouble of absorbingfacts and functions for. fiveyears, she / he has the right ofapplying them aftergraduation. The employers ofthis system must guaranteeemployment to all graduates,or subsidize them with traderates if they cannot.(5) Student - Faculty - StaffControlIt is no secret that thisuniversity is run by the Boardof Governors, a group ofbusinessmen and politicalappointees, and not thestudents, the faculty, or otherpeople that work here. We, themajority, are out in the cold -we have no say. This isprecisely why the tenuredispute arose, and why somegood lectures have beenforced to leave; this is whysome of our courses are boringor irrelevant, and why some ofthe profs that are hereprobably shouldn’t be; this iswhy this ilniversity is a degreemill, an abstraction, and not aplace to take part in ameanin@, educational experience.A student leadershipmust mnize this, but it alsomust be willing to mobilizeother students in fighting forchange, in demanding ourdemocratic rights. It mustalso recognize that anyserious change in oureducation system must involvestriking at the systemwhich the university serves.The universities cannot bemade into islands ofdemocracy and happiness inthe midst of oppression andsqualor. The Young Socialistsrecognize this - that is whywe are here; that is whyweare part of the biggest youthand student movement in thecountry ; and that is why weare winning our program andslate in this election.