18.11.2012 Views

Technology Today Volumn 3 Issue 1 - Raytheon

Technology Today Volumn 3 Issue 1 - Raytheon

Technology Today Volumn 3 Issue 1 - Raytheon

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PHASED ARRAY SYSTEMS<br />

Continued from page 21<br />

to distribute the energy from the highpower<br />

sources to the aperture. The corporate<br />

feed, in turn, interconnected with the<br />

phase shifters and corresponding radiating<br />

elements.<br />

Common phase shifters for both corporateand<br />

space-fed arrays included ferrite (the<br />

most popular type), and PIN diode. The ferrite<br />

phase shifters used the principle of a<br />

variable magnetic field which altered the<br />

wave propagation characteristics to set the<br />

desired phase. PIN diodes were used as RF<br />

switches for combining varying lengths of<br />

transmission lines or as a termination in a<br />

transmission line to alter the phase. Ferrite<br />

phase shifters were most popular at S-band<br />

frequencies and above, since the waveguide<br />

that housed the ferrite was reasonably<br />

sized, provided lower transmission loss,<br />

and was capable of supporting higher<br />

RF power.<br />

Transformation from<br />

Passive to Active, Solid<br />

State Comes of Age<br />

Passive phased arrays provided new capabilities<br />

for radar systems, agile beams and<br />

improved reliability. However, passive<br />

phased array architectures had their problems.<br />

They were heavy, due to the need for<br />

a low loss feed structure like a metallic<br />

waveguide, and/or bulky because of the<br />

depth required of the space feed approach.<br />

Furthermore, their reliability was typically at<br />

the mercy of the high power RF transmitter.<br />

The high power transmitter was a singlepoint<br />

failure risk. An attempt to improve<br />

the reliability was introduced by using a distributed<br />

configuration of lower power<br />

tubes, combined with solid state driver<br />

amplifiers known as Microwave Power<br />

Modules (MPMs). While the MPM<br />

approaches improved reliability, they didn’t<br />

achieve the ultimate goal: an amplifier at<br />

every element of the phased array. Nor did<br />

they afford thinner and lighter-weight<br />

approaches that would have revolutionized<br />

the application of phased arrays to an<br />

unprecedented number of airborne, space<br />

22<br />

and ground platforms. The evolution<br />

of solid-state microwave<br />

devices lagged the digital revolution<br />

that produced personal computers,<br />

and the solid-state transistor<br />

radio, primarily due to the<br />

industry’s inability to produce<br />

devices in volume with features<br />

(e.g., circuit line widths and material<br />

characteristics) that would provide<br />

acceptable performance at<br />

microwave frequencies. Silicon was<br />

the material of choice, as it is today,<br />

for PCs and most consumer electronics.<br />

As previously mentioned, it wasn’t until the<br />

1980s that the U.S. government provided<br />

industry and academia with the funding<br />

needed to develop and mature a technology<br />

that revolutionized phased arrays (and<br />

many other commercial telecom applications.)<br />

It wasn’t, however, until the early<br />

1990s that visionaries at <strong>Raytheon</strong> and two<br />

key customers — Strategic Missile Defense<br />

Command (SMDC), now known as the<br />

Missile Defense Agency (MDA) and a commercial<br />

venture of Motorola sought ways to<br />

produce (in volume) active, electronically<br />

scanned arrays. SMDC for many years had<br />

been visualizing radar systems in support<br />

of missile defense. In 1992, <strong>Raytheon</strong> competed<br />

for, and won the Ground Based<br />

Radar Program (now know as the Terminal<br />

High Altitude Area Defense, THAAD Radar).<br />

During the next three years, <strong>Raytheon</strong><br />

developed the largest and most powerful<br />

solid-state, phased array radar, consisting<br />

of more than 25,000 T/R modules.<br />

AESAs — particularly at L-band and above<br />

— were enabled by GaAs technology. With<br />

this development each radiating element of<br />

the array had its own power and low-noise,<br />

amplifiers, digital phase and attenuation<br />

controls. This new generation of phased<br />

arrays were highly reliable now that the RF,<br />

Power and Control subsystems were all distributed,<br />

i.e., eliminating single point failures.<br />

That is, performance would degrade<br />

gracefully as the element level electronics<br />

began to fail. AESAs allowed unprecedented<br />

capabilities in beam pointing, sidelobe<br />

control, polarization versatility, multiple<br />

The GBR/THAAD AESA.<br />

beams, instantaneous bandwidth and<br />

packaging, just to name a few. <strong>Today</strong>,<br />

platforms — especially in the air and in<br />

space — could benefit from the features<br />

that phased arrays afforded.<br />

Array Packaging:<br />

Brick vs. Tile<br />

The first evolution of AESAs used what is<br />

commonly referred to as a “brick” style<br />

packaging. Brick packaging arranges the<br />

active electronics (and some of the beamforming)<br />

in the plane orthogonal to the<br />

aperture surface (see Figure 3).<br />

Figure 3. Brick and Tile Packaging Architectures<br />

Examples of brick style packaging include<br />

THAAD, SPY-3, GBR-P, F-15, etc. For example,<br />

most of the ground/shipboard and earlier<br />

versions of the airborne-style radar

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!