10.07.2015 Views

Equality in City Zoning and By-Laws - Canadian Mental Health ...

Equality in City Zoning and By-Laws - Canadian Mental Health ...

Equality in City Zoning and By-Laws - Canadian Mental Health ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>City</strong> of W<strong>in</strong>nipeg <strong>By</strong>-Law sec. 210purpose of by-laws permissible l<strong>and</strong> use conditional use permitTaylor McCaffrey LLP


Important Def<strong>in</strong>itionsMultiple Family Dwell<strong>in</strong>g FamilyBoard<strong>in</strong>g House/Lodg<strong>in</strong>g House/Room<strong>in</strong>g HouseNeighbourhood Care HomeTaylor McCaffrey LLP


Neighbourhood Care HomeA dwell<strong>in</strong>g used for the board<strong>in</strong>g or otherresidential accommodation <strong>and</strong> care ortreatment of more than six but not more thantwelve persons <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> which care or treatmentis not provided to any persons not resident <strong>in</strong> thecare home <strong>and</strong> that complies with the Prov<strong>in</strong>cialGovernment’s licens<strong>in</strong>g requirements for carehomes.Taylor McCaffrey LLP


Challenges with this def<strong>in</strong>ition:require some supervisionnot <strong>in</strong>tensity of care <strong>and</strong> treatment contemplatedTaylor McCaffrey LLP


Board<strong>in</strong>g House, Lodg<strong>in</strong>g House orRoom<strong>in</strong>g Housea build<strong>in</strong>g or portion thereof (other than a hotel ormotel) where lodg<strong>in</strong>g, or lodg<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> meals, areprovided for compensation, exclusive of theproprietor <strong>and</strong> his family, without <strong>in</strong>dividualcook<strong>in</strong>g facilities for lodgers, <strong>and</strong> where care,treatment or supervision is not provided toany personTaylor McCaffrey LLP


Challenges with this Def<strong>in</strong>ition….tenants require supervisionconditional use permitvulnerable to opposition by neighbour<strong>in</strong>gcommunityTaylor McCaffrey LLP


Multiple Family Dwell<strong>in</strong>gA build<strong>in</strong>g conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g three (3) or more noncommunicat<strong>in</strong>gdwell<strong>in</strong>g units, each for theexclusive use by one (1) familyTaylor McCaffrey LLP


Familyone (1) person or two (2) or more personsvoluntarily associated, plus any dependents,liv<strong>in</strong>g together as an <strong>in</strong>dependent, self-govern<strong>in</strong>gs<strong>in</strong>gle-housekeep<strong>in</strong>g unitTaylor McCaffrey LLP


Challenges with this Def<strong>in</strong>ition…..created for an able bodied worldscenarios: 3 friends live together v. 3 <strong>in</strong>dividuals live <strong>in</strong> supportive liv<strong>in</strong>g situationunable to meet def<strong>in</strong>ition of Family voluntary associations <strong>in</strong>dependent liv<strong>in</strong>g decisionsTaylor McCaffrey LLP


Effect…..treated differently due only to disability violation of sec. 15(1)can be applied <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>terpretation rather thanstrik<strong>in</strong>g downpossibility for changeTaylor McCaffrey LLP


Alcoholism Foundation ofManitoba v. <strong>City</strong> of W<strong>in</strong>nipeg<strong>City</strong> of W<strong>in</strong>nipeg <strong>By</strong>-Lawgeographic restrictions based on personalcharacteristics2 substantive decisionsviolation of Charter to explicitly draw dist<strong>in</strong>ctionon the basis of personal characteristicsTaylor McCaffrey LLP


AFM cont’dnot necessarily impermissible if <strong>in</strong> effect drawsdist<strong>in</strong>ctions based on personal characteristics justification on basis of sec. 1Taylor McCaffrey LLP


Hadden et al. v. <strong>City</strong> of W<strong>in</strong>nipegtenants – low <strong>in</strong>come, mental illness, bra<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>juryor <strong>in</strong>tellectual disabilityorder to prohibit <strong>City</strong> from clos<strong>in</strong>g residencefailed to reasonably accommodate needs s<strong>in</strong>gle, low <strong>in</strong>come persons with mental healthissues supportive, safe, decent <strong>and</strong> secure shelter with<strong>in</strong>an urban residential communityTaylor McCaffrey LLP


Hadden cont’dchallenged determ<strong>in</strong>ation was a room house <strong>and</strong>not multi-family dwell<strong>in</strong>gissue has not yet come to trialorder means established prima facie caseplausible argument raisedTaylor McCaffrey LLP


Conclusionleft with by-laws which arguably still discrim<strong>in</strong>ate<strong>in</strong> their <strong>in</strong>terpretation, application <strong>and</strong> effect sec. 15(1)Taylor McCaffrey LLP

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!