Citrus Health Management Association (CHMA) - Citrus Research ...
Citrus Health Management Association (CHMA) - Citrus Research ...
Citrus Health Management Association (CHMA) - Citrus Research ...
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Success of the <strong>Citrus</strong> <strong>Health</strong><strong>Management</strong> Area (<strong>CHMA</strong>)program in FloridaMichael E. RogersAssociate Professor of Entomology
What is a <strong>CHMA</strong>?• <strong>Citrus</strong> <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Area• A grower defined grouping of citrusacreage where grower participantscoordinate psyllid control efforts andmanagement of pesticide resistancedevelopment (coordinated rotation ofMOA’s)• VOLUNTARY PROGRAM IN FLORIDA
Why Coordinate Sprays?• Psyllid movement behavior– Between groves; daily basis– Can’t be managed on a block-by-block basis• Short residual activity of pesticides– Airblast application =
Implementation of <strong>CHMA</strong>s• Coordination provided by:– University of Florida (UF-IFAS) Extension– Florida Department of Agriculture &Consumer Services, Division of PlantIndustries (FDACS-DPI)• Grower participation will be necessarybut is VOLUNTARY
ACP Monitoring Program• Personnel from CHRP– USDA and FDACS• Scouting 6,000 blockson a 3 week cycle• Equivalent of 106,469acres scouted eachcycle
www.flchma.org
<strong>CHMA</strong>s as a research tool• Real-world situation• Large scale applications• Area-wide monitoring• Data from <strong>CHMA</strong> program can be used tolearn more about managing psyllids• Example…
Category0 psyllids10 psyllidsNE Desoto <strong>CHMA</strong>(Cycle 3: Sept. 12 – 30, 2011)• Average ACP per block scouted = 0.8571• Numbers presented are mean numberpsyllids per block scouted within each TRSNA2.0NANATrends Cycle 2-3NPD8.70 psyllids for two consecutive cycles0.30.72.8Psyllids decreased to lower categoryPsyllids decrease but remained insame categoryPsyllids increased but remained insame categoryNPDNPDNPDNA0.61.05.02.0 2.8 0.20.5 0.3 4.20.3 0.2 0.3NPDPsyllids increased to a higher categoryNo previous dataNPD0.51.00.10.20.4NANot Available (no counts)NPD0.4NPD
NE Desoto <strong>CHMA</strong> – Cycle 3 Scouting Summary –“The Edge Effect”NW CornerTotal = 19Mean per block = 0.07Maximum (1 block) = 4n = 272NE CornerTotal = 68Mean per block = 0.25Maximum (1 block) = 18CenterTot. = 7Mean = 0.03Max = 3SW CornerTotal = 40Mean per block = 0.15Maximum (1 block) = 5SE CornerTotal = 100Mean per block = 0.3676Maximum (1 block) = 23
Border Sprays Utilized• Danitol (fenpropathrin) applied as a borderspray to all blocks and then around the entireperimeter of the area(and some hotspots)following Cycle 3 scouting (Sept.).• Followed up with a coordinated aerialapplication using an OP insecticide (Oct 20).
Category0 psyllids10 psyllidsNE Desoto <strong>CHMA</strong>(Cycle 3: Sept. 12 – 30, 2011)• Average ACP per block scouted = 0.8571• Numbers presented are mean numberpsyllids per block scouted within each TRSNA2.0NANATrends Cycle 2-3NPD8.70 psyllids for two consecutive cycles0.30.72.8Psyllids decreased to lower categoryPsyllids decrease but remained insame categoryPsyllids increased but remained insame categoryNPDNPDNPDNA0.61.05.02.0 2.8 0.20.5 0.3 4.20.3 0.2 0.3NPDPsyllids increased to a higher categoryNo previous dataNPD0.51.00.10.20.4NANot Available (no counts)NPD0.4NPD
NE Desoto <strong>CHMA</strong> – Cycle 4 Scouting Summary –“The Edge Effect”NW CornerTotal = 9 (19)Mean per block = 0.04 (0.07)Maximum (1 block) = 3 (4)F = 1.52, P = 0.2186NE CornerTotal = 14 (68)Mean per block = 0.05 (0.25)Maximum (1 block) = 5 (18)F = 4.73; P = 0.0301F = 0.16; P = 0.6919CenterTot. = 9 (7)Mean = 0.04 (0.03)Max = 6 (3)SW CornerF = 10.3; P = 0.0014Total = 5 (40)Mean per block = 0.02 (0.15)Maximum (1 block) = 3 (5)SE CornerF = 6.26; P = 0.0126Total = 8 (100)Mean per block = 0.03 (0.3676)Maximum (1 block) = 4 (23)Numbers in ( ) are data from Cycle 3
<strong>CHMA</strong>s as a research tool• In Florida…– We are utilizing the large amounts of datacollected to test new ideas on a large scale, realworldbasis• In California…– Similar opportunity to validate control methodsunder the California growing conditions
<strong>CHMA</strong> Summary• Scouting data generated thus far are showingpromising results from coordinated sprayefforts!• Coordinated “dormant” sprays should be thestarting point for a coordinated spray program• Participation by all is needed!!!
Acknowledgements• <strong>Citrus</strong> <strong>Research</strong> and Development Foundation• Efforts of FDACS / USDA ACP scouting program• Numerous grower leaders• <strong>Citrus</strong> Extension Agents• Email questions/comments: mrgrs@ufl.edu