21.11.2012 Views

A New Benchmark: Speech Perception in Everyday Life ... - Med-El

A New Benchmark: Speech Perception in Everyday Life ... - Med-El

A New Benchmark: Speech Perception in Everyday Life ... - Med-El

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 1<br />

Figure 2<br />

2<br />

WORSE<br />

SRT dB SPL<br />

BETTER<br />

Statistical analysis reveals significant differences <strong>in</strong> performance for the 3G and OPUS 2 processors.<br />

Only MED-EL users could still understand 50% of speech when noise was presented at levels louder<br />

than speech. Additionally, only MED-EL users cont<strong>in</strong>ued to improve as the listen<strong>in</strong>g condition became<br />

progressively more challeng<strong>in</strong>g. As evidenced by this <strong>in</strong>dependent research study, MED-EL audio<br />

processors provide outstand<strong>in</strong>g hear<strong>in</strong>g results, specifically <strong>in</strong> challeng<strong>in</strong>g listen<strong>in</strong>g situations.<br />

BETTER PERFORMANCE<br />

Performance with the OPUS 2 Processor <strong>in</strong> a Rov<strong>in</strong>g-level <strong>Speech</strong> Test<br />

This study 2 aimed at compar<strong>in</strong>g speech perception under fixed-level and fluctuat<strong>in</strong>g-level (or rov<strong>in</strong>g-<br />

level) conditions and built upon the test method used <strong>in</strong> the study by Haumann et al. 1<br />

Methods<br />

The study population consisted of seven experienced users of the OPUS 2. To assess speech<br />

perception at fixed speech levels, adaptive OLSA sentence tests were performed at speech levels of<br />

50 dB, 65 dB, and 80 dB. To assess speech perception at rov<strong>in</strong>g speech levels, a test was performed<br />

<strong>in</strong> which three adaptive OLSA sentence tests present<strong>in</strong>g speech at 50 dB, 65 dB, and 80 dB,<br />

respectively, were randomly <strong>in</strong>terleaved. Thus, <strong>in</strong> this test, similar to the method used by Haumann et<br />

al., the presentation level of each sentence randomly varied by 0, +15 or -15 dB. Subjects were not<br />

allowed to make any processor adjustments dur<strong>in</strong>g the tests but had to rely only on the Automatic<br />

Sound Management featured <strong>in</strong> the OPUS audio processors.<br />

Results<br />

SNR <strong>in</strong> dB<br />

INCREASING NOISE LEVEL<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

-2<br />

MEAN SRT IN ROVING HSM<br />

Auria<br />

Harmony<br />

The results of both the fixed-level tests and the rov<strong>in</strong>g-level tests are shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 2. <strong>Speech</strong><br />

perception was not significantly affected by level with<strong>in</strong> both the fixed-level speech tests and the<br />

rov<strong>in</strong>g-level speech tests. In addition, speech perception did not differ significantly between the fixed-<br />

level tests and the rov<strong>in</strong>g-level tests.<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

-1<br />

-2<br />

-3<br />

-4<br />

-5<br />

-6<br />

3G Freedom<br />

MED-EL OPUS 2<br />

50 dB 65 dB 80 dB ROVING<br />

ROVING<br />

50 dB<br />

65 dB<br />

80 dB<br />

+/- 10 dB<br />

+/- 15 dB

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!