1.0 Please rate your syllabus: 1- initial, 2- emerging, 3 ... - DLSU-D

STATUS OF DLSU-D SYLLABUS IN (SUBJECT)Date: ________1.0 Please rate your syllabus: 1- initial, 2- emerging, 3- developed, or 4 - highly developed 11.1 Topics and performance/output vis-à-vis ELGA(Highly developed is when the list is reasonable, appropriate, and comprehensive. Topics and theoutput/performance are integrated and facilitate teaching-learning process. The list is aligned with theELGAs)1.2 Assessment of outputs/performance(Highly developed is when outputs/performance demonstrates what the students are expected to learn.There is also explicit agreed rubric for assessment)1.3 Alignment(Highly developed is when various parts of the syllabus like grading system, activities, topics, strategies,references are explicitly aligned with the desired outputs/performance. The list of activities also suit theincreasing level of proficiency)1.4 Planning of assessment1 The tool picks up from the discussions and handouts distributed during the 3 rd Lasallian Learning Congress, April 3-5, 2011. Theparticular handout which was the basis of this tool was adapted from WASC-F:\PUBLICATIONS\Resources\080430_Rubrics.doc.

(Highly developed is when the syllabus indicates a wide range of learning activities and teaching strategiesthat provide opportunity for the following: supplemental learning, independent learning, critical thinking -both being critical of self and others’ work-, integration, extension, and creation of knowledge,collaboration, adaptability, problem solving, effective oral and written communication, initiative, andcuriosity and imagination )1.5 Student exchange(Highly developed is when students are made fully aware of outputs/performance expected of them andthe means of assessment, opportunities for consultations are regular, and other policies related to the classare articulated.2.0 Please list down revision points that would lead to the improvement of areas that are not yet highly developed2.1 ___________________________________________________________________________________2.2 ___________________________________________________________________________________2.3 ___________________________________________________________________________________Name and signature subject coordinator: ___________________________________Name and signature department chair: ___________________________________

Draft of guidelines for collaborative activities1.0 The guidelines are made to help address the concern of DLSU-D students about being bombarded with projects. As aresponse, a final output may satisfy two or even three subject requirements for the semester as provided for in thesucceeding provisions.2.0 All major subjects that require a research project as the final output are expected to work in collaboration with Englishor Filipino research subject.3.0 In the absence of a research subject during that semester, collaboration is expected to be made with anyEnglish/Filipino writing subject.4.0 All subjects which require performance/oral presentation as a final output are expected to work in collaboration withEnglish of Filipino speech subjects.5.0 In the absence of speech subjects, collaboration may be done with ENGL101 or 104 subjects or the equivalent Filipinosubject.6.0 Two or three major subjects are expected to work in collaboration for a final output.7.0 Other GE subjects (History, Math, Biology, etc.) are expected to work in collaboration with each other or with NSTP.