11.07.2015 Views

The Bar Tribune Vol. 5 No. 4 - May 2008 - Integrated Bar of the ...

The Bar Tribune Vol. 5 No. 4 - May 2008 - Integrated Bar of the ...

The Bar Tribune Vol. 5 No. 4 - May 2008 - Integrated Bar of the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Vol</strong>. 5 <strong>No</strong>. 4 <strong>May</strong> <strong>2008</strong>IBP ContinuesActivist AdvocaciesLawyers led by IBP National President Feliciano M. Bautista march along Makati City to protest government anomalies<strong>The</strong> <strong>Integrated</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>Philippines has continued to step upadvocacy efforts in political reform andhuman rights, in line with <strong>the</strong>incumbent IBP Board’s thrust <strong>of</strong> beinga leading voice in national affairs.“<strong>The</strong> IBP is a respected organizationand we desire to make our positions knownon <strong>the</strong> burning issues <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> day. It is ourduty as lawyers and servants <strong>of</strong> justice tochampion worthy causes that have directbearing on <strong>the</strong> lives <strong>of</strong> our people,” IBPNational President Feliciano “Shane” M.Bautista said.Last December 2007, <strong>the</strong> IBP releaseda statement on corruption that waspublished in <strong>the</strong> leading dailies and pickedup by <strong>the</strong> general media. <strong>The</strong> organizationdecried <strong>the</strong> “culture <strong>of</strong> corruption” in <strong>the</strong>Arroyo administration and called on <strong>the</strong>members <strong>of</strong> Congress to step upinvestigations on various governmentscandals.<strong>The</strong> IBP <strong>the</strong>n led a contingent <strong>of</strong>lawyers in <strong>the</strong> February 15 and 29, <strong>2008</strong>multi-sectoral inter-faith rallies in MakatiCity. Atty. Bautista joined IBP <strong>of</strong>ficers andmembers in speaking against irregularitiesrelating to <strong>the</strong> ZTE broadband deal.<strong>The</strong> Board <strong>of</strong> Governors came outwith ano<strong>the</strong>r media statement on ZTE(full text at <strong>the</strong> last page <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> newsletter)last April 25, this time informing <strong>the</strong>public <strong>of</strong> its position on <strong>the</strong> Neri vs. Senatecase that was recently decided by <strong>the</strong>Supreme Court and presently underreconsideration.<strong>The</strong> National Committee on Legal Aid(NCLA) has, on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, focused onhuman rights issues with <strong>the</strong> signing <strong>of</strong>two Memoranda <strong>of</strong> Agreement. Itpartnered with <strong>the</strong> Australian aid agencyAUSAid and <strong>The</strong> Asia Foundation fora comprehensive audit and documentation<strong>of</strong> human rights cases throughout <strong>the</strong>country last March <strong>2008</strong>. In April <strong>2008</strong>,<strong>the</strong> NCLA signed ano<strong>the</strong>r agreement, thistime with <strong>the</strong> American <strong>Bar</strong> Association for<strong>the</strong> preparation <strong>of</strong> primers on R.A. 6292,<strong>the</strong> Violence Against Women and ChildrenAct, in <strong>the</strong> Visayan dialect.


Pr<strong>of</strong>ileDOLE Secretary Brion Returnsto Judiciary as 161st SC JusticeBy Madeleine U. V. G. AvanzadoAfter a two-year stint as Secretary<strong>of</strong> Labor and Employment, formerCourt <strong>of</strong> Appeals (CA) Associate JusticeArturo D. Brion has come home to <strong>the</strong>Judiciary upon taking his oath as <strong>the</strong>Supreme Court’s 161st magistrate lastMarch 17 before Chief Justice ReynatoS. Puno.A man blessed with diverse talents andskills, Justice Brion’s work experience cutsa swath across <strong>the</strong> three branches <strong>of</strong>government, as well as showcases <strong>the</strong>multiple facets <strong>of</strong> law practice.He began his law career by engagingin private law practice, mostly in labor law,with <strong>the</strong> Siguion Reyna Montecillo &Ongsiako Law Offices from 1975 to 1982.At <strong>the</strong> same time, he shared his legalknowledge in <strong>the</strong> academe as a member<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ateneo de Manila UniversityFaculty <strong>of</strong> Law from 1976 to 1981, and in1986.He entered government service in 1982as Executive Director <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Institute <strong>of</strong>Labor and Manpower Studies under <strong>the</strong>Philippine Ministry <strong>of</strong> Labor until 1984,when he went on to become Vice-Chair<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Labor and Employment Committee<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mambabatas Pambansa, PhilippineNational Assembly.Brion became Deputy Minister <strong>of</strong>Labor for Legal and Legislative Affairsfrom 1985 to 1986 before returning toprivate practice as Senior Partner <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>Natividad Delos Reyes Maambong & BrionLaw Firm from 1986 to 1988, andsubsequently <strong>of</strong> Siguion Reyna from 1995to 2001. During this time, he worked as aconsultant for <strong>the</strong> Civil ServiceCommission on public sector unionism,leading to <strong>the</strong> paper “Public SectorUnionism – a Proposed Reconfiguration,”and returned to teach at Ateneo Law from1995 to 1997.He went back to full-time governmentservice in 2001 when he was appointedUndersecretary <strong>of</strong> Labor for LaborRelations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Laborand Employment and subsequentlyUndersecretary <strong>of</strong> Foreign Affairs forSpecial Projects <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong>Foreign Affairs a year after. He likewisetaught at <strong>the</strong> University <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> PhilippinesSchool <strong>of</strong> Labor and Industrial Relationsfrom 2001 to 2002 and <strong>the</strong> Far EasternUniversity Institute <strong>of</strong> Law from 2005 to2006.Justice Brion, <strong>the</strong> son <strong>of</strong> retiredRegional Trial Court Judge Edon B. Brionand Laura S. Dizon, crossed from <strong>Bar</strong> toBench when he was appointed CAAssociate Justice in July 2003. Heremained a Senior Member <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>Appellate Court’s 15th Division until June2006, before accepting <strong>the</strong> task <strong>of</strong> leading<strong>the</strong> country’s Department <strong>of</strong> Labor andEmployment that July. He has since joined<strong>the</strong> Judiciary anew to complete <strong>the</strong> 15-member High Tribunal, filling in <strong>the</strong>vacancy left by <strong>the</strong> retirement <strong>of</strong> JusticeAngelina Sandoval-Gutierrez.Justice Brion states that he has nojudicial philosophy, but instead takes onevery case brought before him objectively,considering each case’s unique situationand circumstance, before applying <strong>the</strong>Constitution and <strong>the</strong> laws.Justice Brion is married to chemistlawyerAtty. Antonietta C. Articona-Brionwho is presently a CA Court Attorney.<strong>The</strong>y are blessed with two similarly multiskilledchildren, Antonella A. Brion, ahistorian with a Bachelor <strong>of</strong> Arts degreein History from York University in Toronto,Canada, presently engaged in InformationTechnology, and Arturo Brion, Jr., acomputer engineering graduate <strong>of</strong>McMaster University and Bachelor <strong>of</strong>Laws degree holder from <strong>the</strong> University <strong>of</strong>New Brunswick, now engaged inIntellectual Property Law Practice inOttawa, Canada. (Reprinted from <strong>the</strong> SupremeCourt’s Benchmark)“Justice Brion states that he has no judicial philosophy, but instead takes on every casebrought before him objectively, considering each case’s unique situation andcircumstance, before applying <strong>the</strong> Constitution and <strong>the</strong> laws”2 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Tribune</strong> <strong>Vol</strong>ume 5, Number 4


IBP EventsRegional ConventionsEastern Visayas Regional Convention (led by Governor Evergisto S. Escalon) - February 6-8, <strong>2008</strong>, Sabin Resort Hotel, Ormoc City<strong>The</strong>me: "Lawyers: Vanguards <strong>of</strong> Civil and Political Rights"Western Visayas Regional Convention (led by Governor Raymund Jorge A. Mercado) - March 6-8, <strong>2008</strong>, Negros Oriental Convention Center, Dumaguete City<strong>The</strong>me: “Raising <strong>the</strong> bar <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ‘BAR’: A call to Excellence in <strong>the</strong> Practice <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Legal Pr<strong>of</strong>ession”<strong>No</strong>r<strong>the</strong>rn Luzon Regional Convention (led by Governor Abelardo C. Estrada)April 15-17, <strong>2008</strong>, Baguio Country Club, Baguio City<strong>The</strong>me: “Lawyers: Catalysts for Reforms”Board <strong>of</strong> Governors Meeting - April 15, <strong>2008</strong>, Baguio Country Club, Baguio City6 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Tribune</strong> <strong>Vol</strong>ume 5, Number 4


<strong>Integrated</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> PhilippinesTHE SEARCH FOR TRUTH CONTINUES<strong>The</strong> Philippine Supreme Court has ruled on <strong>the</strong> matter <strong>of</strong> executive privilege invoked bySecretary Romulo Neri on <strong>the</strong> ZTE deal. As <strong>the</strong> nation awaits a decision on <strong>the</strong> Senate’sMotion for Reconsideration, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Integrated</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Philippines desires to inform <strong>the</strong> publicboth <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> important matters in <strong>the</strong> landmark ruling, and <strong>the</strong> organization’s collective sentimentson certain principles that deal with <strong>the</strong> very core <strong>of</strong> our constitutional democracy.<strong>The</strong> Senate and <strong>the</strong> entire nation have been hungry for answers on three questions, <strong>the</strong> veryissues Secretary Neri claims to be covered by executive privilege. First, whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> President followed up on <strong>the</strong>project. Second, whe<strong>the</strong>r Neri was dictated to prioritize ZTE. Third, whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> President gave <strong>the</strong> go-ahead despitebeing advised <strong>of</strong> alleged bribes.<strong>The</strong> matter is not about E.O. 464 anymore because it has already been revoked. What <strong>the</strong> Supreme Court dealt wi<strong>the</strong>xtensively was <strong>the</strong> constitutional matter <strong>of</strong> “presidential communications privilege.” Are <strong>the</strong> sensitive informationexchanged by Mr. Neri and Mrs. Arroyo entitled to respect by a co-equal branch <strong>of</strong> government?We agree with <strong>the</strong> Supreme Court that this kind <strong>of</strong> executive privilege extends to diplomatic relations. We find itdifficult to fathom, however, that <strong>the</strong> Court would allow a letter by Executive Secretary Ermita as sufficient justificationto invoke <strong>the</strong> privilege. <strong>The</strong> letter, addressed to <strong>the</strong> Senate, merely made a broad and generalized claim that ourdiplomatic and economic relations with China would be prejudiced by a disclosure <strong>of</strong> confidential Presidentialinformation. <strong>The</strong> IBP finds insufficient ground for giving prime importance to <strong>the</strong> letter, especially since briberyinvolving <strong>the</strong> highest <strong>of</strong>ficials <strong>of</strong> government and millions <strong>of</strong> pesos are involved.We likewise consider it almost hurtful for <strong>the</strong> Supreme Court to rule that “<strong>the</strong> right <strong>of</strong> Congress or any <strong>of</strong> its Committeesto obtain information in aid <strong>of</strong> legislation cannot be equated with <strong>the</strong> people’s right to public information. <strong>The</strong> formercannot claim that every legislative inquiry is an exercise <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> people’s right to information,” or that <strong>the</strong> SenateCommittees leading <strong>the</strong> investigation “should not invoke as justification in <strong>the</strong>ir exercise <strong>of</strong> power a right properlybelonging to <strong>the</strong> people in general.”<strong>The</strong> Filipino people have been consistently stubborn in <strong>the</strong>ir desire to extract honest information from Malacañang.We have exercised our right to peaceably assemble, our right to express our sentiments in all available fora, ourfundamental and sacred right to be informed.<strong>The</strong> Senate has taken <strong>the</strong> cudgels for us when even popular assemblies and mass expressions <strong>of</strong> indignation haveproven futile. We simply cannot understand why <strong>the</strong> Senate has to be practically reprimanded for being adelantadoand usisero in <strong>the</strong> people’s behalf.We could go on and on detailing <strong>the</strong> legal arguments in Romulo L. Neri vs. Senate Committee, et. al., but o<strong>the</strong>rvenues and occasions are more appropriate. As lawyers, we continue to demand full disclosure on matters relatingto government corruption. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Integrated</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Philippines clings to <strong>the</strong> shared hope that <strong>the</strong> Supreme Court,in all its wisdom, would afford us a chance to find out <strong>the</strong> unfiltered truth on <strong>the</strong> ZTE broadband deal.FELICIANO M. BAUTISTANational PresidentABELARDO C. ESTRADA ERNESTO A. GONZALES, JR. MARCIAL M. MAGSINO BONIFACIO T. BARANDON, JR.Governor for <strong>No</strong>r<strong>the</strong>rn Luzon Governor for Central Luzon Governor for Greater Manila Governor for BicolandiaEVERGISTO S. ESCALON RAYMUND JORGE A. MERCADO RAMON EDISON C. BATACAN CARLOS L. VALDEZ, JR.Governor for Eastern Visayas Governor for Western Visayas Governor for Eastern Mindanao Governor for Western Mindanao8 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> <strong>Tribune</strong> <strong>Vol</strong>ume 5, Number 4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!