Statoil øker innsatsen for maritim sikkerhet

Statoil øker innsatsen for maritim sikkerhetSjøsikkerhetskonferansen 2012 - Haugesund 26-27 SeptemberClassification: Internal 2011-12-09

Mumbai High, India, July 27, 2005Minor incident on a support vessel escalated to a disaster22 people diedTotal casualty of assets, multi-billion loss in production,severe environmental impact and fatal damage toreputationCould something like this happenin the North Sea?2 - Copyright©Statoil March 2012 Corporate presentation: Crossing energy frontiers

Ulike tema vi truleg kjem innom i dag:«Nuh gaar alt saa meget bedre…» (Statoil aukar innsatsen etc…)Bitte litt sjølvransaking (kunne vi ha jobba betre?)Rikeleg med utfordringar til dokke industrien - Har næringa gjort nok?RolleavklaringarNår vi samarbeider3Classification: Copyright©Statoil Internal October 2011-12-09 Corporate presentation: Crossing energy frontiers

A leading company in offshoreoil and gas productionCore business in Statoil is dependent onMaritime OperationCopyright©Statoil October 2011 Corporate presentation: Crossing energy frontiers

Marine Assurances andRisk Management- what is it all about?6 - Classification: Internal 2011-04-27

Maritime Competence and VettingMCV MissionVerification&ComplianceKnowledge&LearningSafely bySeaStandards&ProceduresSafe, reliable and environmentallyresponsible maritime operations protectingStatoil’s value creation and reputation• set standards• deploy best practice• capture lessons learned• monitor complianceSafely by Sea• ensure improvement of processesrelated to maritime operationsCopyright©Statoil October 2011 Corporate presentation: Crossing energy frontiers

What is it all about?Standards &ProceduresAlign and improve the quality of Statoil’s maritime standards and procedures• Capture and implement best practice as maritime A-standards• Develop and maintain corporate maritime policies and standards• Renewal – Simplification – Globalization with a corporate business mind-set• Be proactive towards Regulatory bodies, Class and industry organizationsCopyright©Statoil October 2011 Corporate presentation: Crossing energy frontiers

What is it all about?Verification &ComplianceCorporate responsibilities for quality assurance through consistent vetting• Maintain and improve vetting standards in Statoil• OVID, SIRE and Suitability inspections for all type of vessels• Reduce Statoil’s risk exposure by identifying non-compliance• Learning and experience transfer from vetting to industry standards and policiesCopyright©Statoil October 2011 Corporate presentation: Crossing energy frontiers

Berøring mellom skip oginnretning siste 15 år11Classification: Copyright©Statoil Internal October 2011-12-09 Corporate presentation: Crossing energy frontiers

”Oops – I did it again….” (Britney Spears)Siddis SkipperLearning, Learning, Learning, Learning.........Never ending12 Copyright©Statoil -October 2011 Corporate presentation: Crossing energy frontiers

Complacency; The industries biggest enemy“We need to attack the biggest enemy of anyorganization: Complacency.We should continue to reward performance andcelebrate success, but we must acknowledge thatthere is always room for doing better.What create a great company are the desire to learn,to improve and an intense hunger to win. This is thekind of company I want Statoil to be”. Corporate Summit 2011Classif13 Copyright©Statoil -October 2011 Corporate presentation: Crossing energy frontiersication

Key challenges in maritime activities• High complexity in vessel design• High complexity in operations• Increasing number of vessels• Lack of competence and experienceIs the balance between technology andHSE maintained?14Classification: Copyright©Statoil Internal October 2011 2012-03-22 Corporate presentation: Crossing energy frontiers

We are dependent on DPToo manynon-compliancesQuestion Question textObservations15.4.3 Is there an Electronic Technician onboard with approved training on the DP system? 40815.2.12 Are DP footprints regularly recorded and compared against previous footprints and the DP Capability Plots? 30515.2.11 Are project related factors such as pipelay loads considered? 25015.2.2 Does the vessel/unit use the IMCA Incident reporting system? 23915.1.10 Have all personnel involved in DP operations read and understood the FME(C)A? 22615.3.9 Are the emergency stops alarmed against failure? 20815.3.7 Are the offsets maintained in a single file? 19515.1.8 Are the annual DP trials scheduled within a year +/- 3 months of the anniversary date? 18915.2.13 Is a defined contingency matrix in place to cover weather limits and the cessation of operations? 17815.1.9 Have recommendations from the DP trial report been addressed and closed out as required? 17015.2.8 Have all personnel involved in DP operations read the manual and demonstrate an understanding of its contents? 16815.3.10 Does vessel/unit have a data recorder that records all DP parameters including operator keystrokes? 16015.4.1 Are the officers suitably qualified for DP Operations? 14315.2.10 Are DP Capability Plots in place to cover the normal and expected operations? 14315.1.7 Does the vessel/unit have on board a copy of the most recent DP trial report? 14115.4.2 Do all key personnel on board comply with the IMCA minimum requirements for experience and training? 13015.1.6 Have the recommendations (if any) from the proving trials been addressed? 12815.3.13 Are all DP operations conducted with the bus bars separated in 'redundancy protected mode'? 11415.1.4 Is the FMEA less than 5 years old? 11215.1.5 Is a record of proving trials available on board? 10815.1.3 Do the failure modes meet IMO MSC Circ.645 with 'fail as set, or fail to zero'? 102Is the criticality fullyunderstood by Operatorsand Management?15.3.3 Are the preferred position reference systems defined in the operations manual and do not conflict with project requirements? 10015.2.1 Has station keeping been incident-free in the last 12 months? 9915.3.16 Is the DP system included within the Planned Maintenance System (PMS)? 9315.3.14Do the operational procedures include guidance on number of generators to be running at different power loads and are DPOs and engineersfamiliar with them? 9115.3.15 Are consequence analysis alarms used as input to the contingency matrix? 8615.1.1 Does the vessel have on board a copy of the most recent FMEA ? 8515.2.3 Does the vessel/unit carry out risk assessments for specific operations? 8315.2.7 Does the vessel/unit have a comprehensive DP operating manual on board? 6915.2.14 Are Well Specific Operations Guidelines (WSOG) in place and utilised? 6115.3.4 Are relative and/or absolute position references considered and defined for operations? 5815.1.11 If modifications have been undertaken, has the FME(C)A been up-dated and the modifications proven by testing? 5115.3.6 Are the position reference systems provided with a schematic to cover power supply, external inputs/outputs and wiring diagrams? 5015.2.9Are checklists in place to cover bridge, engine room and electrical systems operation e.g. when mobilising, 500 m safety zone entry (DP set-up),DPO and engine room periodical changeovers? 4715.3.1 Is the Dynamic Positioning equipment on board in good order? 4615.3.2 Are all position reference systems in good order? 4615.3.11 Is there a documented procedure for the regular checking of the secure power supply systems? 4215.3.5 Are there manual changeover switches fitted to acoustics (or other) to allow selection of specific Gyros and vertical reference units? 3515.2.4Is the DP control console located so that the DPO can also observe the controls, the external environment and the working operations of thevessel/unit? 2515.3.8 Does each thruster have an independent emergency stop that is well protected against inadvertent operation? 2115.1.2 If the DP system is not classed, has the FMEA been assessed against IMO MSC.Circ 645? 1815.2.5 Are manual controls and emergency stops located within easy reach? 1515.2.6 Can the controls for position reference systems be accessed within easy reach of the DP control station? 1015.3.12If vessel/unit is DP class 2 or 3, does the DP system have a continuous analysis function checking that in terms of thruster and power vessel/unitcan maintain position after the worst case failure? 615Classification: Copyright©Statoil Internal October 2011-12-09 Corporate presentation: Crossing energy frontiers

Is the industry doing enough tosecure competence at all levels?• Vessel Crew• Management / Owner• Contractors• R&D• Oil Company• Class and Flag• PSADP2 Blackout Incidents• Statoil - survey operation• Three incidents within three months• Two sister vessels• Same root cause16Classification: Copyright©Statoil Internal October 2011-12-09 Corporate presentation: Crossing energy frontiers

Ship Vetting - One of the corner stones in Marine Assurance• To vet was originally a horse-racing termreferring to the requirement that a horse neededto be checked for health and soundness by aveterinarian before being allowed to race.• In shipping terms vetting is a term used for a riskanalysis process that is done in most of themajor oil companies before hiring a vessel fortransporting any goods e.g. oil, chemical, gas,solids, etc.Classif18 Copyright©Statoil -October 2011 Corporate presentation: Crossing energy frontiersication

Ship Vetting and Suitability InspectionsOCIMFOCIMF formed 8th April 1970. The oil industry'sresponse to increasing public awareness of marinepollution. OCIMF consist of 85 members(2012)SIREOVIDSuitabilityTank Vessels and BargesSIRE Database:• In total 180,000 inspection reports submitted• 22,500 reports on over 8000 inspected vessels inthe last 12 months• In average an oil tanker is inspected every 5 th monthSTATOIL - SIRE:• 5372 requests for ship vetting in 2011• 2000 vessel inspections per year (ext. inspectors)• 100 vessel inspections by internal inspectorsAll type of Offshore Support VesselsOVID Database:• Introduced 01.01.2011• In total 1228 inspection reports(Feb2012)• Increasing by approx. 150 reports permonthSTATOIL - OVID:• 150 requests for ship vetting per year• 100 vessel inspections per year• 25 vessel inspections per year by use ofinternal inspectorsOffshore loadingDivingROVCraneCable and pipe layRock fall-pipe systemHealth and hygieneClassif19 Copyright©Statoil -October 2011 Corporate presentation: Crossing energy frontiersication

Tanker Oil spill – List of “Records”# Shipname Year Location Spill Size(tonnes)1 ATLANTIC 1979 Off Tobago, West Indies 287,000EMPRESS2 ABT SUMMER 1991 700 nautical miles off Angola 260,0003 CASTILLO DEBELLVER1983 Off Saldanha Bay, South Africa 252,0004 AMOCO CADIZ 1978 Off Brittany, France 223,0005 HAVEN 1991 Genoa, Italy 144,0006 ODYSSEY 1988 700 nautical miles off Nova Scotia, Canada 132,0007 TORREY 1967 Scilly Isles, UK 119,000CANYON8 SEA STAR 1972 Gulf of Oman 115,0009 IRENES 1980 Navarino Bay, Greece 100,000SERENADE10 URQUIOLA 1976 La Coruna, Spain 100,00011 HAWAIIAN 1977 300 nautical miles off Honolulu 95,000PATRIOT12 INDEPENDENT 1979 Bosphorus, Turkey 95,000A13 JAKOB 1975 Oporto, Portugal 88,000MAERSK14 BRAER 1993 Shetland Islands, UK 85,00015 KHARK 5 1989 120 nautical miles off Atlantic coast of Morocco 80,00016 AEGEAN SEA 1992 La Coruna, Spain 74,00017 SEA EMPRESS 1996 Milford Haven, UK 72,00018 NOVA 1985 Off Kharg Island, Gulf of Iran 70,00019 KATINA P. 1992 Off Maputo, Mozambique 66,70020 PRESTIGE 2002 Off Spanish coast 63,00035 EXXONVALDEZ1989 Prince William Sound, Alaska, USA 37,000Classif20 Copyright©Statoil -October 2011 Corporate presentation: Crossing energy frontiersication

Longer – Deeper – Colder21Classification: Copyright©Statoil Internal October 2011-12-09 Corporate presentation: Crossing energy frontiers

Vessel vs. Subsea Technology StepsKey enabler for future subseacompression projects and ultimately theSubsea Factory•Viking SevenSubsea ProcessingIntervention Vessel•Edda Fauna•Viking Poseidon•Far SagaSubsea Compression•Normand MjolneTordis SSBIOrmenLange /SnøhvitTyrihansSRSWISubsea FactoryÅsgardTOGIStatfjord satGullfaksCopyright©Statoil October 2011 Corporate presentation: Crossing energy frontiers

23Classification: Copyright©Statoil Internal October 2011-12-09 Corporate presentation: Crossing energy frontiers

Longer – Deeper – ColderArctic Exploration24Classification: Copyright©Statoil Internal October 2011-12-09 Corporate presentation: Crossing energy frontiers

25Classification: Copyright©Statoil Internal October 2011-12-09 Corporate presentation: Crossing energy frontiers

Understand and manage risk• Risk identification• Risk mitigation• Risk management26Classification: Copyright©Statoil Internal October 2011-12-09 Corporate presentation: Crossing energy frontiers

Risk Picture TankersSystematic mapping of riskrelated to tankers since 1997Potential loss of lives in Statoil1 % 12 %1 %Perm. offsh. installations33 %5 %Tankers (2006)Mobile rigs9 %Other floating unitsProcess plants (land)Distribution on landDevelopment11 %Other risk elementsOil transport on tankers represents a majorpart of Statoil’s total risk exposure28 %Serious environmental risk in Statoil5 %−−28% of the potential of loss of lives72% of the total risk for major environmentaldamage23 %Permanent offshoreinstallationsTankers (2006)Mobile rigs72 %Classif27 Copyright©Statoil -October 2011 Corporate presentation: Crossing energy frontiersication

Risk picture Maritime Activity (RMA)• The overall risk picture for maritimeoperations not defined todaySupplyTransitLoading / unloading• Identify and understand risk for managementdecisions and strategic planningTug escortTransitSeismic surveyMobilisingTransitGEOGRAPHICAL AREAS CONSIDERED• Norwegian Continental Shelf• UK - Sheringham Shoal Project• Brazil – Peregrino ProjectPipe layingSupplyMobilising* Tankers (covered by Risk Picture Tankers), Floating production and storage, drilling and floating accommodation are not included28 Copyright©Statoil October 2011 Corporate presentation: Crossing energy frontiers

Activity approachSurvey andseabedinterventionIMR andconstructionDivingOffshoresupportOther1. Geophysical survey (including shallow gas surveys)2. Metocean and environmental survey3. Geotechnical investigations4. Seabed survey5. Pipeline inspection6. Seabed rock installation7. Trenching and dredging8. Inspection, maintenance and repair9. Construction, installation and cessation (including heavy lift operations)10. Pipeline installation11. Diving12. Supply (including pipe carrier operations)13. Anchor handling / tug14. Stand-by / rescue15. Guard16. Harbour tug17. Wind turbine support29Classification: Copyright©Statoil Internal October 2011-12-09 Corporate presentation: Crossing energy frontiers

Results and future activities• Complete the overall risk picture in MaritimeActivity• Communicate results and learning• Work together with the industry for development ofbarriers and further risk reduction30Classification: Copyright©Statoil Internal October 2011-12-09 Corporate presentation: Crossing energy frontiers

Human, technological andorganisational barriersAccidentUnderstand and manage riskBuilding barriers to avoid any accident31 - Copyright©Statoil Classification: March Internal 2012 Corporate 2012-03-22 presentation: Crossing energy frontiers

Takk for no !Presentation prepared by ReinertNordtveit and Helge I VestreClassif Copyright©Statoil October 2011 Corporate presentation: Crossing energy frontiersication3