an assessment of the moral movement on climate disruption

climateaccess.org

an assessment of the moral movement on climate disruption

!!".F7$!$&*)0F$>!0,!/#$!F.*CE)'(,>!&$*/0',!'5!/#$!)$&(7/&T!/#$!(&$!'5!2.0>!')!-'7(,/$$)!&/.558!$>(*./0',!.,>!/).0,0,E!)$A(0)$4$,/&8!&'()*$&!'5!5(,>0,E8!.,>!4$4F$)!*#.).*/$)0&/0*&@!W./.!.)$!E0-$,!5')!$.*#!'5!/#$!/B'!*7(&/$)&!.,>!/#$!/'/.7!&.427$!.,>!/$&/&!'5!&0E,050*.,*$8!*'42.)0,E!/#$!/B'!E)'(2&!.)$!0,*7(>$>@!L'/$!/#./!.E.0,8!/'!2)$&$)-$!>$E)$$&!'5!5)$$>'48!4.,?!'5!/#$!)$&2',&$&!B$)$!*'77.2&$>!/'!>0*#'/'40$&@!+,!4'&/!*.&$&!/#$!>$*0&0',&!/'!*'77.2&$!)$57$*/$>!/#$!4$>0.,!)$&2',&$!E0-$,@!"'!>$/$)40,$!/#$!2$)*$,/ages associated with ong>theong> missing category (e.g. budgets ong>ofong> less thong>anong> $100Kor multiple focus), subtract ong>theong> given percentage from 100. Degrees ong>ofong> freedom for ong>theong> reported chisquarevalues were equal to 1 for all ong>anong>alyses.Table 3-- Staff Characteristics, Funding Sources, ong>anong>d Membership Characteristics byAnalysis GroupRespondent Paid or Volunteer (Question 26)Gp 1 (%) Gp 2 (%) Total Chi. Sq. Prob.Respondent director raong>theong>r thong>anong> staff 85 76 82 1.11 0.29Respondent in Paid Position 58 86 69 6.55 0.01How do people who direct ong>theong> daily operations ong>ofong> your orgong>anong>ization or program expong>anong>d ong>theong>irskills? (Check all that apply) (Question 30)Gp 1 (%) Gp 2 (%) Total Chi. Sq. Prob.Through voluntarily chosen education ong>anong>d trainingprograms 81 88 84 0.75 0.38Through required education ong>anong>d training programs 0 12 4 7.25 0.007No Voluntary or Required Training ong>ofong> Staff 25 9 19 3.81 0.05What are ong>theong> primary sources ong>ofong> your orgong>anong>ization or program's funding? (Question 26)Gp 1 (%) Gp 2 (%) Total Chi-sq Prob.Foundation grong>anong>ts from secular environmentalorgong>anong>izations 37 42 38 0.18 0.67Foundation grong>anong>ts from religious orgong>anong>izations 35 13 27 4.92 0.03Oong>theong>r foundation grong>anong>ts 24 29 26 0.31 0.58Large private donors 12 35 21 6.61 0.01Membership dues 25 23 26 0.09 0.77Small donations from members ong>ofong> constituents 63 45 56 2.42 0.12Earned income from services 24 10 17 2.48 0.12Corporate donations 4 10 6 1.12 0.30What is ong>theong> approximate size ong>ofong> your orgong>anong>ization or program's membership, defined aspeople who may dues or regularly participate in activities? (Question 31)Gp 1 (%) Gp 2 (%) Total Chi-sq prob.Membership Larger thong>anong> 100 62 87 70 6.33 0.01How would you describe ong>theong> overall political orientation ong>ofong> your members or constituents?(Question 34)Gp. 1 Gp. 2 TotalPercentage ong>ofong> members who are political liberal(Meong>anong>) 62.2 74.7 66.8Stong>anong>dard Deviation 20.4 16.3 19.9T-ratio 2.86Probability p = .01"#$!%$&'()*$!+,,'-./0',!1)'(2!!!!!3&&$&&4$,/!'5!/#$!6').7!6'-$4$,/!!!!!32)078!9:;

More magazines by this user
Similar magazines