Numerous challenges remain, however, in integrating <strong>the</strong>sedata and providing <strong>the</strong>m at scales appropriate for managingwater resources in a dynamic climate. C<strong>on</strong>tinuous in siturecords extend for more than 130 years in some locati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> U.S. These systematic records can never be duplicatedand are an invaluable source for understanding changes in<strong>the</strong> envir<strong>on</strong>ment. Moreover, archived hydroclimate data mayprove useful for purposes unimagined during networkimplementati<strong>on</strong>, e.g., streamflow data initially collected forwater development in <strong>the</strong> U.S. West now provide <strong>the</strong> l<strong>on</strong>gestsystematic record <strong>of</strong> climate variability and change.Development <strong>of</strong> water budgets in <strong>the</strong> natural and engineeredenvir<strong>on</strong>ment remains a challenging problem, and must beinformed by data from remotely-sensing, in situ sensors, andmodels. The U.S. Geological Survey Water Census initiativehas, for example, a goal to develop water budgets for all HUC12 (hydrologic unit code) watersheds in <strong>the</strong> U.S. A piloteffort for water budget development recently was completedin <strong>the</strong> U.S. porti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Great Lakes watershed, anddem<strong>on</strong>strates <strong>the</strong> challenges <strong>of</strong> developing water budgets atthis scale. One challenge in water budget development isthat many important processes, e.g., evapotranspirati<strong>on</strong>,cannot be directly measured. Process understanding requiresdata at <strong>the</strong> scale <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> process in order develop models thatcan be used to predict effects <strong>of</strong> changes <strong>on</strong> water budgets.Data collected using in situ sensors play a critical role inprocess understanding and extensi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> this understandingto predictive models. Aspects <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> engineered waterenvir<strong>on</strong>ment are not measured and must be estimatedthrough statistical sampling, models, and basinwide data,available <strong>on</strong>ly through remote sensing. Water quality is animportant aspect <strong>of</strong> water availability. In order to accuratelypredict <strong>the</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> water leaving a particular reservoir (i.e.,unsaturated z<strong>on</strong>e, etc.), it is necessary to understand andquantify <strong>the</strong> water movement through that reservoir. This,again, requires process understanding that is dependent <strong>on</strong>thoughtfully collected in situ data and models to extrapolateto meaningful spatial scales. Although recent progress hasbeen made, <strong>the</strong>re is tremendous need and opportunity fornew sensors for measuring key water-quality parameters. Thetransiti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> new data types and modeling results to watermanagement requires a deliberate effort. Whereas, forexample, a point rainfall amount is readily understood bywater managers, integrated, multi-sensor products that <strong>of</strong>fermuch more informati<strong>on</strong> than a single measure currently arerarely appreciated or used in operati<strong>on</strong>al activities. Newsensors, more sophisticated models, and increasinglyresolved remotely-sensed data are exciting scientificchallenges, but this new informati<strong>on</strong> also must be madereadily available for water management and archived in ac<strong>on</strong>sistent and accessible manner for future analyses.Barnes, MalloryDetecti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Spatial and Temporal Cloud CoverPatterns over Hawai’i Using Observati<strong>on</strong>s fromTerra and Aqua MODISBarnes, Mallory 1 ; Miura, Tomoaki 1 ; Giambelluca, Thomas 2 ;Chen, Qi 21. NREM, University <strong>of</strong> Hawaii - Manoa, H<strong>on</strong>olulu, HI, USA2. Geography, University <strong>of</strong> Hawaii - Manoa, H<strong>on</strong>olulu, HI,USAAn understanding <strong>of</strong> patterns in cloud cover is essentialto analyzing and understanding atmospheric and hydrologicprocesses, particularly evapotranspirati<strong>on</strong>. To date, <strong>the</strong>re hasnot yet been a comprehensive analysis <strong>of</strong> spatial andtemporal patterns in cloud cover over <strong>the</strong> Hawaiian Islandsbased <strong>on</strong> high resoluti<strong>on</strong> cloud observati<strong>on</strong>s. The MODISinstruments aboard <strong>the</strong> Aqua and Terra satellites have <strong>the</strong>potential to supply <strong>the</strong> necessary high resoluti<strong>on</strong>observati<strong>on</strong>s. The MODIS instrument has a spatialresoluti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> 250m in bands 1-2, 500m in bands 3-7, and1000m in bands 8-36 and acquires data c<strong>on</strong>tinuously,providing global coverage every 1-2 days. The objectives <strong>of</strong>this study were to generate high resoluti<strong>on</strong> cloud cover datafrom <strong>the</strong> Terra MODIS satellite sensors and to evaluate <strong>the</strong>irability to detect <strong>the</strong> spatial patterns <strong>of</strong> cloudiness and <strong>the</strong>irdiurnal changes over <strong>the</strong> Hawaiian Islands. The TerraMODIS cloud mask product (MOD35) was obtained for <strong>the</strong>m<strong>on</strong>th <strong>of</strong> January for three years (2001 – 2003). MOD35provides cloudiness data at 1km resoluti<strong>on</strong> twice per day(<strong>on</strong>ce in <strong>the</strong> morning and <strong>on</strong>ce at night). M<strong>on</strong>thly statisticsincluding mean cloud cover probability at each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> twooverpass times were generated by processing <strong>the</strong> dailyMOD35 cloudiness time series. The derived m<strong>on</strong>thlystatistics were analyzed for diurnal changes in total amountand spatial patterns <strong>of</strong> cloudiness. Our results indicated that<strong>the</strong>re were c<strong>on</strong>sistent differences in <strong>the</strong> diurnal cycle betweenwindward and leeward sides <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> main Hawaiian Islands.In general, <strong>the</strong> windward sides <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> islands were cloudier atnight than during <strong>the</strong> day. The leeward sides <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> islands,<strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, were generally less cloudy at night thanduring <strong>the</strong> day. On Hawai’i, <strong>the</strong> windward (Hilo) side <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>island was cloudier at nighttime than during <strong>the</strong> day. Theleeward (K<strong>on</strong>a) side, in c<strong>on</strong>trast, was less cloudy at nighttimethan during <strong>the</strong> day. The pattern was similar <strong>on</strong> Oahu,where <strong>the</strong> windward sides <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> island were cloudier atnight but <strong>the</strong> leeward sides and central porti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> islandwere less cloudy at night than during <strong>the</strong> day. Kauai andMolokai dem<strong>on</strong>strated <strong>the</strong> pattern as well, with <strong>the</strong>windward side <strong>of</strong> both islands more cloudy at night and <strong>the</strong>leeward sides less cloudy at night. Overall, <strong>the</strong>re was morec<strong>on</strong>trast between cloudiness <strong>on</strong> windward and leeward sidesat nighttime than during <strong>the</strong> day. These results appeared tocorresp<strong>on</strong>d with existing knowledge <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> diurnal variati<strong>on</strong>in precipitati<strong>on</strong>. We c<strong>on</strong>clude that MODIS 1 km daily cloudmask data can provide spatial patterns <strong>of</strong> cloud cover over<strong>the</strong> Hawaiian Islands in detail. We plan to extend ouranalysis to include <strong>the</strong> Aqua MODIS cloud product(MYD35), process <strong>the</strong> full MODIS record (10+ years) for36
seas<strong>on</strong>al trends, and integrate cloud cover data from <strong>the</strong>Geostati<strong>on</strong>ary Envir<strong>on</strong>mental satellites for an improvedtemporal resoluti<strong>on</strong>.Baugh, CalumUsing field data to assess <strong>the</strong> effectiveness <strong>of</strong>adjusted spaceborne derived DEMs for replicatingAmaz<strong>on</strong> River floodplain hydro-dynamicsBaugh, Calum 1 ; Yamazaki, Dai 2, 3 ; Hall, Amanda 1 ; Bates,Paul 1 ; Schumann, Guy 11. School <strong>of</strong> Geographical Sciences, University <strong>of</strong> Bristol,Bristol, United Kingdom2. Institute <strong>of</strong> Industrial Science, The University <strong>of</strong> Tokyo,Tokyo, Japan3. Byrd Polar Research Center, Ohio State University,Columbus, OH, USAHydro-dynamic modelling requires accurate DEM datato provide <strong>the</strong> topographic boundary c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>. In <strong>the</strong> case<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Amaz<strong>on</strong>, vegetati<strong>on</strong> distorti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>on</strong>ly suchavailable dataset (SRTM) can degrade <strong>the</strong> accuracy <strong>of</strong> thismodelling. However <strong>the</strong> extent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se impacts are not yetfully understood because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> hydro-dynamic fieldobservati<strong>on</strong>s from <strong>the</strong> floodplain. Such field data can beused firstly to identify <strong>the</strong> original impact <strong>of</strong> vegetati<strong>on</strong>distorti<strong>on</strong> up<strong>on</strong> a hydro-dynamic simulati<strong>on</strong>. Sec<strong>on</strong>d, it canassess <strong>the</strong> effectiveness <strong>of</strong> DEM adjustment algorithms atremoving <strong>the</strong> distorti<strong>on</strong>. Therefore, to address this issue <strong>the</strong>following data were collected within <strong>the</strong> floodplain 250 kmupstream from Manaus <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> central Amaz<strong>on</strong> mainstemduring July 2011; flow velocity, directi<strong>on</strong> and depth, watersurface elevati<strong>on</strong> and tree height. A hydro-dynamicsimulati<strong>on</strong> using <strong>the</strong> LISFLOOD-FP model was <strong>the</strong>nperformed using <strong>the</strong> original SRTM DEM. Comparing <strong>the</strong>simulati<strong>on</strong> results to <strong>the</strong> field flow data showed pooragreement, for example <strong>the</strong> velocity gradients differed by twoorders <strong>of</strong> magnitude. Therefore a versi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> SRTM DEMfrom Yamazaki et al., (submitted to J. Hydrol) who adjustedit to better include floodplain channels was used. Thisdem<strong>on</strong>strated greater agreement between <strong>the</strong> field flow dataand <strong>the</strong> model in areas <strong>of</strong> channelized floodplain flow.However a comparis<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> water surface elevati<strong>on</strong>s between<strong>the</strong> field and modelling data showed that vegetati<strong>on</strong>distorti<strong>on</strong> still remained in <strong>the</strong> adjusted DEM. A vegetati<strong>on</strong>correcti<strong>on</strong> method, validated using <strong>the</strong> tree height field data,was <strong>the</strong>n applied to <strong>the</strong> adjusted DEM. The results showed<strong>the</strong> greatest agreement between <strong>the</strong> field and modellingdata. This work <strong>the</strong>refore shows how floodplain hydrodynamicdata collected in <strong>the</strong> field can be used to validateand correct an adjusted DEM in <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>text <strong>of</strong> hydrodynamicsimulati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> large remote rivers.Becker, Mat<strong>the</strong>w W.Wetlands as Groundwater Piezometers in BorealForestsBecker, Mat<strong>the</strong>w W. 1 ; Bab<strong>on</strong>is, Gregory S. 2 ; Fredrick, Kyle C. 31. Dept Geological Sciences, California State L<strong>on</strong>g Beach,L<strong>on</strong>g Beach, CA, USA2. Geology, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA3. Department <strong>of</strong> Earth Sciences, California University <strong>of</strong>Pennsylvania, California, PA, USABoreal forests are c<strong>on</strong>sidered a critical comp<strong>on</strong>ent <strong>of</strong>global carb<strong>on</strong> cycling. Groundwater plays an important partin boreal forests as depth to water table influencesbiodiversity and groundwater discharge provides droughtresistance and nutrients for plants. Understanding howgroundwater influences <strong>the</strong>se remote ecologicalenvir<strong>on</strong>ments <strong>on</strong> a sub-c<strong>on</strong>tinental scale requires <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong>remote sensing combined with hydrologic models. Wepresent an example <strong>of</strong> such an applicati<strong>on</strong>, in whichwetlands and seepage lakes are used as groundwaterhydraulic head observati<strong>on</strong>s in a numerical flow model. Thetest area is <strong>the</strong> Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Highland Lakes Regi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong>Wisc<strong>on</strong>sin, USA, which is a sou<strong>the</strong>rn boreal / temperateforest biome punctuated by kettle lakes, wetlands, and bogs.These surface water features are <strong>of</strong>ten well c<strong>on</strong>nected togroundwater so can serve as measurements <strong>of</strong> groundwaterhydraulic head which, in turn, can be used to determinegroundwater flow and storage and its potential forbiogeochemical transport. The key is to isolate those featuresthat are hydraulically c<strong>on</strong>nected to groundwater and <strong>the</strong>nmake accurate elevati<strong>on</strong> measurements <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir surface. Toisolate seepage lakes that were well c<strong>on</strong>nected togroundwater we used <strong>the</strong>rmal band temperaturemeasurements from <strong>the</strong> ASTER satellite. We used AIRSAR toseparate open wetlands from mixed wetlands so thataccurate elevati<strong>on</strong>s measurements could be made. Wecompared SRTM elevati<strong>on</strong>s to ground-based measurements<strong>of</strong> elevati<strong>on</strong> and investigated <strong>the</strong>ir influence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>iraccuracy <strong>on</strong> a 900 square kilometer numerical flow model.These investigati<strong>on</strong>s indicate that seepage lakes, wetlands,and bogs are effective measurements <strong>of</strong> ground-waterelevati<strong>on</strong>s, but in flat-lying areas small errors in surfaceelevati<strong>on</strong>s can have significant impacts <strong>on</strong> groundwater flowmodels. Rigorous classificati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> remotely sensed surfacewater features is, <strong>the</strong>refore, critical to c<strong>on</strong>fident predicti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong>groundwater flow and biogeochemical transport. Radarband imaging is particularly useful tool locating suitablepoints <strong>of</strong> water elevati<strong>on</strong> measurements in lakes, wetlands,and bogs.37
- Page 5 and 6: SCIENTIFIC PROGRAMSUNDAY, 19 FEBRUA
- Page 7 and 8: 1600h - 1900hMM-1MM-2MM-3MM-4MM-5MM
- Page 9 and 10: GM-7GM-8GM-9GM-10GM-11GM-12GM-13160
- Page 11 and 12: EM-25EM-26EM-27EM-28EM-29EM-301600h
- Page 13 and 14: SMM-8SMM-9SMM-10SMM-11SMM-12SMM-13S
- Page 15 and 16: SCM-24SCM-251600h - 1900hPM-1PM-2PM
- Page 17 and 18: 1030h - 1200h1030h - 1200h1030h - 1
- Page 19 and 20: ET-13ET-14ET-15ET-16ET-17ET-18ET-19
- Page 21 and 22: SWT-19SWT-201600h - 1900hSMT-1SMT-2
- Page 23 and 24: SCT-14SCT-15SCT-16SCT-17SCT-18SCT-1
- Page 25 and 26: MT-2MT-3MT-4MT-5MT-6MT-7MT-8MT-9MT-
- Page 27 and 28: 1330h - 1530h1530h - 1600h1600h - 1
- Page 29 and 30: esilience to hydrological hazards a
- Page 31 and 32: Alfieri, Joseph G.The Factors Influ
- Page 33 and 34: Montana and Oregon. Other applicati
- Page 35: accuracy of snow derivation from si
- Page 40 and 41: a single mission, the phrase “nea
- Page 42 and 43: climate and land surface unaccounte
- Page 44 and 45: esolution lidar-derived DEM was com
- Page 46 and 47: further verified that even for conv
- Page 48 and 49: underway and its utility can be ass
- Page 50 and 51: Courault, DominiqueAssessment of mo
- Page 52 and 53: used three Landsat-5 TM images (05/
- Page 55: storage change solutions in the for
- Page 59 and 60: Famiglietti, James S.Getting Real A
- Page 61 and 62: can be thought of as operating in t
- Page 63 and 64: mission and will address the follow
- Page 65 and 66: Gan, Thian Y.Soil Moisture Retrieva
- Page 67 and 68: match the two sets of estimates. Th
- Page 69 and 70: producing CGF snow cover products.
- Page 71 and 72: performance of the AWRA-L model for
- Page 73 and 74: oth local and regional hydrology. T
- Page 75 and 76: Euphorbia heterandena, and Echinops
- Page 77 and 78: the effectiveness of this calibrati
- Page 79 and 80: presents challenges to the validati
- Page 81 and 82: long period time (1976-2010) was co
- Page 83 and 84: has more improved resolution ( ) to
- Page 85 and 86: in the flow over the floodplain ari
- Page 87 and 88:
fraction of the fresh water resourc
- Page 89 and 90:
to determine the source of the wate
- Page 91 and 92:
hydrologists, was initially assigne
- Page 93 and 94:
Sturm et al. (1995) introduced a se
- Page 95 and 96:
calendar day are then truncated and
- Page 97 and 98:
climate associated with hydrologica
- Page 99 and 100:
California Institute of Technology
- Page 101 and 102:
egion in Northern California that i
- Page 103 and 104:
Moller, DelwynTopographic Mapping o
- Page 105 and 106:
obtained from the Fifth Microwave W
- Page 107 and 108:
a constraint that is observed spati
- Page 109 and 110:
groundwater degradation, seawater i
- Page 111 and 112:
approach to estimate soil water con
- Page 113 and 114:
Norouzi, HamidrezaLand Surface Char
- Page 115 and 116:
Painter, Thomas H.The JPL Airborne
- Page 117 and 118:
Pavelsky, Tamlin M.Continuous River
- Page 119 and 120:
interferometric synthetic aperture
- Page 121 and 122:
elevant satellite missions, such as
- Page 123 and 124:
support decision-making related to
- Page 125 and 126:
oth the quantification of human wat
- Page 127 and 128:
parameter inversion of the time inv
- Page 129 and 130:
ground-based observational forcing
- Page 131 and 132:
Selkowitz, DavidExploring Landsat-d
- Page 133 and 134:
Shahroudi, NargesMicrowave Emissivi
- Page 135 and 136:
well as subsurface hydrological con
- Page 137 and 138:
Sturm, MatthewRemote Sensing and Gr
- Page 139 and 140:
Sutanudjaja, Edwin H.Using space-bo
- Page 141 and 142:
which can be monitored as an indica
- Page 143 and 144:
tools and methods to address one of
- Page 145 and 146:
Vanderjagt, Benjamin J.How sub-pixe
- Page 147 and 148:
Vila, Daniel A.Satellite Rainfall R
- Page 149 and 150:
and landuse sustainability. In this
- Page 151 and 152:
e very significant as seepage occur
- Page 153 and 154:
Wood, Eric F.Challenges in Developi
- Page 155 and 156:
Xie, PingpingGauge - Satellite Merg
- Page 157 and 158:
Yebra, MartaRemote sensing canopy c
- Page 159 and 160:
used. PIHM has ability to simulate