a single missi<strong>on</strong>, <strong>the</strong> phrase “near-real-time” within thisc<strong>on</strong>text refers to an effective latency <strong>of</strong> approximately 5 to 15days. For <strong>the</strong> last few years <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> missi<strong>on</strong>, <strong>the</strong> GRACEscience data system has been producing near real-timeestimates <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Earth gravity field <strong>on</strong> a best-effort basis,using automated processes. The Level-1B tracking data,produced for m<strong>on</strong>itoring <strong>the</strong> health <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> flight system, isbeing opportunistically used for producing <strong>the</strong>se gravityfield estimates. The short latency, and process automati<strong>on</strong>,implies that <strong>the</strong> ancillary data and models used in thisprocessing cannot be put to <strong>the</strong> same scrutiny as <strong>the</strong>operati<strong>on</strong>al Level-2 gravity field data products. Theseproducts have so far been used for correlative interpretati<strong>on</strong>with o<strong>the</strong>r remote-sensing and in situ data during floods in<strong>the</strong> Amaz<strong>on</strong> (spring 2009), Pakistan (fall 2009), and inQueensland, Australia (winter 2010). This paper, after a briefpresentati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> processing approach, will focus <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong>challenges imposed <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> interpretati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se lowlatencydata products due to processing methods and due to<strong>the</strong> choice <strong>of</strong> background models.Billah, Mirza M.Impacts <strong>of</strong> Different Evapotranspirati<strong>on</strong> Estimates<strong>on</strong> Quantify Regi<strong>on</strong>al Scale Terrestrial WaterStorageBillah, Mirza M. 1 ; Goodall, J<strong>on</strong>athan L. 1 ; Narayan, Ujjwal 2 ;Lakshmi, Venkat 11. Civil and Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Engg., University <strong>of</strong> SouthCarolina, Columbia, SC, USA2. Department <strong>of</strong> GIS, Richland County, Columbia, SC,USAEvapotranspirati<strong>on</strong> is difficult flux to quantify atregi<strong>on</strong>al spatial scales. It is a crucial comp<strong>on</strong>ent <strong>of</strong> terrestrialwater balance, which is important to estimate wateravailability and sustainable water resources management. Wetest three different approaches for estimatingevapotranspirati<strong>on</strong> and evaluate how well each approachperforms at closing <strong>the</strong> water budget for sub-watersheds thatrange in size from 1.2 km2 to 3350 km2 in South Carolina.The Variable Infiltrati<strong>on</strong> Capacity (VIC) model, NorthAmerican Regi<strong>on</strong>al Reanalysis (NARR) program and remotesensing derived estimates are used for evapotranspirati<strong>on</strong>.Results from <strong>the</strong> analysis show that all <strong>the</strong> three methods forestimating evapotranspirati<strong>on</strong> produce similar variati<strong>on</strong> inseas<strong>on</strong>al water storage (positive in fall and winter, negative inspring and summer), but differences exist in <strong>the</strong> magnitudeand spatial patterns <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> estimates. In <strong>the</strong> spring andsummer m<strong>on</strong>ths, relatively low evapotranspirati<strong>on</strong> rates wereestimated by remote sensing as compared to VIC and NARRmodels. The remotely sensing evapotranspirati<strong>on</strong> in fall andwinter m<strong>on</strong>ths fell between <strong>the</strong> higher VICevapotranspirati<strong>on</strong> and <strong>the</strong> lower corrected NARRevaporati<strong>on</strong> estimates. We compared our estimates <strong>of</strong> changein terrestrial water storage using <strong>the</strong> threeevapotranspirati<strong>on</strong> estimates with drought indices providedby <strong>the</strong> Drought M<strong>on</strong>itor (DM) program and observedgroundwater levels as independent means for validating <strong>the</strong>estimates. On an annual and seas<strong>on</strong>al basis, <strong>the</strong> change interrestrial water storage estimated using remote sensingevapotranspirati<strong>on</strong> was c<strong>on</strong>sistent with annual and seas<strong>on</strong>aldrought variati<strong>on</strong> recorded by <strong>the</strong> DM program.Comparis<strong>on</strong> with groundwater levels showed that remotesensing evapotranspirati<strong>on</strong> approach resulted in <strong>the</strong> highestcorrelati<strong>on</strong> am<strong>on</strong>g <strong>the</strong> three estimates <strong>of</strong> evapotranspirati<strong>on</strong>.We c<strong>on</strong>clude from this study that remote sensing is morereliable and c<strong>on</strong>sistent at estimating regi<strong>on</strong>al scaleevapotranspirati<strong>on</strong> as compared to <strong>the</strong> two model-basedestimates in our study area.Bitew, Menberu M.Can One Use Streamflow Observati<strong>on</strong>s as a Way <strong>of</strong>Evaluating Satellite Rainfall Estimates?Bitew, Menberu M. 1 ; Gebremichael, Mek<strong>on</strong>nen 11. Civil & Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Engineering, University <strong>of</strong>C<strong>on</strong>necticut, Storrs, CT, USAObserved streamflow data are increasing used as a way<strong>of</strong> evaluating <strong>the</strong> accuracy <strong>of</strong> satellite rainfall estimates,particularly in gauged watersheds where <strong>the</strong>re are no reliableground-based rainfall measuring sensors. The procedurec<strong>on</strong>sists <strong>of</strong> (1) calibrating hydrologic models with satelliterainfall inputs, (2) using satellite rainfall estimates as inputsinto hydrologic model, and (3) comparis<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> simulated andobserved streamflow. The authors investigated <strong>the</strong> feasibility<strong>of</strong> this approach for two watersheds within <strong>the</strong> Blue NileRiver Basin in Ethiopia: Gilgel Abay Watershed (Area <strong>of</strong>1,656 km2, rainfall accounting for 71% <strong>of</strong> streamflow), andBlue Nile River Basin (Area <strong>of</strong> 176,000 km2, rainfallaccounting for 20.4% <strong>of</strong> streamflow). The approach was putto test to evaluate PERSIANN rainfall estimates, which hadlarge underestimati<strong>on</strong> biases as found out throughcomparis<strong>on</strong> with rain gauge values. The approachsuccessfully detects <strong>the</strong> underestimati<strong>on</strong> bias in <strong>the</strong> GilgelAbay watershed, but fails to detect it in <strong>the</strong> Blue Nile Riverbasin. Apparently, in <strong>the</strong> Gilgel Abay Watershed,precipitati<strong>on</strong> is a significant porti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> streamflow, andany errors committed in <strong>the</strong> model parameter estimatespertaining to evapotranspirati<strong>on</strong> and groundwater flow(during calibrati<strong>on</strong> phase due to lack <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se datasets)cannot hide <strong>the</strong> substantial bias in <strong>the</strong> rainfall estimates.However, in <strong>the</strong> Blue Nile River Basin, precipitati<strong>on</strong> is asmall porti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> streamflow, and any errors committedin model parameter estimates can easily hide <strong>the</strong> substantialbias in <strong>the</strong> rainfall estimates. The authors recommend thatstr<strong>on</strong>g cauti<strong>on</strong> be exercised in using observed streamflow toevaluate <strong>the</strong> accuracy <strong>of</strong> satellite rainfall estimates inwatersheds where precipitati<strong>on</strong> is <strong>on</strong>ly a small fracti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>streamflow. In <strong>the</strong> absence <strong>of</strong> reliable model parameterestimates pertaining to evapotranspirati<strong>on</strong> and groundwater,<strong>the</strong> authors recommend against <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> streamflowobservati<strong>on</strong>s a way <strong>of</strong> evaluating satellite rainfall estimates inregi<strong>on</strong>s where precipitati<strong>on</strong> is not a large porti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>streamflow.40
Bolten, John D.Evaluati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Middle East and North AfricaLand Data Assimilati<strong>on</strong> SystemBolten, John D. 1 ; Rodell, Matt 1 ; Zaitchik, Ben 11. Hydrological Sciences Lab, NASA GSFC, Greenbelt, MD,USAThe Middle East and North Africa (MENA) regi<strong>on</strong> isdominated by dry, warm deserts, areas <strong>of</strong> dense populati<strong>on</strong>,and inefficient use <strong>of</strong> fresh water resources. Due to <strong>the</strong>scarcity, high intensity, and short durati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> rainfall in <strong>the</strong>MENA, <strong>the</strong> regi<strong>on</strong> is pr<strong>on</strong>e to hydroclimatic extremes thatare realized by devastating floods and times <strong>of</strong> drought.However, given its widespread water stress and <strong>the</strong>c<strong>on</strong>siderable demand for water, <strong>the</strong> MENA remains relativelypoorly m<strong>on</strong>itored. This is due in part to <strong>the</strong> shortage <strong>of</strong>meteorological observati<strong>on</strong>s and <strong>the</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> data sharingbetween nati<strong>on</strong>s. As a result, <strong>the</strong> accurate m<strong>on</strong>itoring <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>dynamics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> water cycle in <strong>the</strong> MENA is difficult. TheLand Data Assimilati<strong>on</strong> System for <strong>the</strong> MENA regi<strong>on</strong>(MENA LDAS) has been developed to provide regi<strong>on</strong>al,gridded fields <strong>of</strong> hydrological states and fluxes relevant forwater resources assessments. As an extensi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> GlobalLand Data Assimilati<strong>on</strong> System (GLDAS), <strong>the</strong> MENA LDASwas designed to aid in <strong>the</strong> identificati<strong>on</strong> and evaluati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong>regi<strong>on</strong>al hydrological anomalies by synergistically combining<strong>the</strong> physically-based Catchment Land Surface Model (CLSM)with observati<strong>on</strong>s from several independent data productsincluding soil-water storage variati<strong>on</strong>s from <strong>the</strong> GravityRecovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) and irrigati<strong>on</strong>intensity derived from <strong>the</strong> Moderate Resoluti<strong>on</strong> ImagingSpectroradiometer (MODIS). In this fashi<strong>on</strong>, we estimate <strong>the</strong>mean and seas<strong>on</strong>al cycle <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> water budget comp<strong>on</strong>entsacross <strong>the</strong> MENA.Borak, JordanA Dynamic Vegetati<strong>on</strong> Aerodynamic RoughnessLength Database Developed From MODIS Imageryfor Improved Modeling <strong>of</strong> Global Land-Atmosphere ExchangesBorak, Jordan 1, 2 ; Jasinski, Michael F. 21. Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center, University<strong>of</strong> Maryland, Greenbelt, MD, USA2. Hydrological Sciences Laboratory, NASA Goddard SpaceFlight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USAA new global database <strong>of</strong> seas<strong>on</strong>ally varying vegetati<strong>on</strong>aerodynamic roughness for momentum is being developedfor all global land areas by combining a physical model <strong>of</strong>surface drag partiti<strong>on</strong> with MODIS vegetati<strong>on</strong> dataproducts. The approach, previously published in Jasinski etal. (2005) and Borak et al. (2005), utilizes Raupach’s (1994)roughness sublayer formulati<strong>on</strong>, employing specific dragparameters developed for each MODIS land cover type. Theprocedure yields a unique vegetati<strong>on</strong> roughness length (z0)and zero-plane displacement height (d0), <strong>on</strong> a pixel-by-pixelbasis, <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> land cover type, canopy area index, andcanopy height. Time series roughness quantities arecurrently being computed at 1 km resoluti<strong>on</strong> for all globalland regi<strong>on</strong>s for each MODIS 8-day compositing period for<strong>the</strong> 10 complete years <strong>of</strong> data available for <strong>the</strong> MODISperiod <strong>of</strong> record (2001-1010). The new dynamic satellitebasedroughness fields, when employed within large-scalehydrologic, mesoscale and climate models, are expected toimprove representati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> surface fluxes and boundary layercharacteristics, compared to models that utilize a traditi<strong>on</strong>alroughness look-up table. The roughness formulati<strong>on</strong> isvalidated using published roughness data from past fieldexperiments.Borsche, MichaelEstimati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> high Resoluti<strong>on</strong> Land Surface HeatFlux Density Utilizing Geostati<strong>on</strong>ary Satellite DataBorsche, Michael 1 ; Loew, Alexander 11. Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg,GermanyIn this study a flexible framework is presented whichallows for <strong>the</strong> estimati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> land surface energy and waterfluxes based mainly <strong>on</strong> remote sensing satellite observati<strong>on</strong>sas input. Major data input is taken from geostati<strong>on</strong>arysatellite observati<strong>on</strong>s which are available at a very hightemporal (30min) and moderate spatial (5x5km) resoluti<strong>on</strong>from <strong>the</strong> ISCCP reprocessing effort. The land surface schemec<strong>on</strong>sists <strong>of</strong> a single layer surface resistance model which isdriven by c<strong>on</strong>sistent input from remote sensing observati<strong>on</strong>sand is c<strong>on</strong>strained by remote sensing based observati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong>surface skin temperature and soil moisture. The coupling <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> land surface model with a dynamic boundary layermodel implements an additi<strong>on</strong>al c<strong>on</strong>straint to <strong>the</strong> surfaceflux estimati<strong>on</strong>s. The paper is focused <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> evaluati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> estimated heat fluxes at <strong>the</strong> global scale. The heat fluxestimates are validated against globally selected eddycovariance measurements from stati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> FLUXNETflux stati<strong>on</strong> network. Specific experiments are presented thatdisentangle <strong>the</strong> various sources <strong>of</strong> uncertainties in <strong>the</strong> usedsatellite forcing data and propagate <strong>the</strong>se uncertainties toerrors <strong>of</strong> latent heat fluxes. Finally we present a quasi-globalmulti-year latent heat flux record and its corresp<strong>on</strong>dinganomalies to dem<strong>on</strong>strate <strong>the</strong> climate applicability <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>framework.Bounoua, LahouariCentury Scale Evaporati<strong>on</strong> Trend: AnObservati<strong>on</strong>al StudyBounoua, Lahouari 11. Bospheric Sciences Branch, Code 691 SSED, Greenbelt,MD, USASeveral climate models with different complexityindicate that under increased CO2 forcing, run<strong>of</strong>f wouldincrease faster than precipitati<strong>on</strong> overland. However,observati<strong>on</strong>s over large U.S watersheds indicate o<strong>the</strong>rwise.This inc<strong>on</strong>sistency between models and observati<strong>on</strong>ssuggests that <strong>the</strong>re may be important feedbacks between41
- Page 5 and 6: SCIENTIFIC PROGRAMSUNDAY, 19 FEBRUA
- Page 7 and 8: 1600h - 1900hMM-1MM-2MM-3MM-4MM-5MM
- Page 9 and 10: GM-7GM-8GM-9GM-10GM-11GM-12GM-13160
- Page 11 and 12: EM-25EM-26EM-27EM-28EM-29EM-301600h
- Page 13 and 14: SMM-8SMM-9SMM-10SMM-11SMM-12SMM-13S
- Page 15 and 16: SCM-24SCM-251600h - 1900hPM-1PM-2PM
- Page 17 and 18: 1030h - 1200h1030h - 1200h1030h - 1
- Page 19 and 20: ET-13ET-14ET-15ET-16ET-17ET-18ET-19
- Page 21 and 22: SWT-19SWT-201600h - 1900hSMT-1SMT-2
- Page 23 and 24: SCT-14SCT-15SCT-16SCT-17SCT-18SCT-1
- Page 25 and 26: MT-2MT-3MT-4MT-5MT-6MT-7MT-8MT-9MT-
- Page 27 and 28: 1330h - 1530h1530h - 1600h1600h - 1
- Page 29 and 30: esilience to hydrological hazards a
- Page 31 and 32: Alfieri, Joseph G.The Factors Influ
- Page 33 and 34: Montana and Oregon. Other applicati
- Page 35 and 36: accuracy of snow derivation from si
- Page 37 and 38: seasonal trends, and integrate clou
- Page 42 and 43: climate and land surface unaccounte
- Page 44 and 45: esolution lidar-derived DEM was com
- Page 46 and 47: further verified that even for conv
- Page 48 and 49: underway and its utility can be ass
- Page 50 and 51: Courault, DominiqueAssessment of mo
- Page 52 and 53: used three Landsat-5 TM images (05/
- Page 55: storage change solutions in the for
- Page 59 and 60: Famiglietti, James S.Getting Real A
- Page 61 and 62: can be thought of as operating in t
- Page 63 and 64: mission and will address the follow
- Page 65 and 66: Gan, Thian Y.Soil Moisture Retrieva
- Page 67 and 68: match the two sets of estimates. Th
- Page 69 and 70: producing CGF snow cover products.
- Page 71 and 72: performance of the AWRA-L model for
- Page 73 and 74: oth local and regional hydrology. T
- Page 75 and 76: Euphorbia heterandena, and Echinops
- Page 77 and 78: the effectiveness of this calibrati
- Page 79 and 80: presents challenges to the validati
- Page 81 and 82: long period time (1976-2010) was co
- Page 83 and 84: has more improved resolution ( ) to
- Page 85 and 86: in the flow over the floodplain ari
- Page 87 and 88: fraction of the fresh water resourc
- Page 89 and 90:
to determine the source of the wate
- Page 91 and 92:
hydrologists, was initially assigne
- Page 93 and 94:
Sturm et al. (1995) introduced a se
- Page 95 and 96:
calendar day are then truncated and
- Page 97 and 98:
climate associated with hydrologica
- Page 99 and 100:
California Institute of Technology
- Page 101 and 102:
egion in Northern California that i
- Page 103 and 104:
Moller, DelwynTopographic Mapping o
- Page 105 and 106:
obtained from the Fifth Microwave W
- Page 107 and 108:
a constraint that is observed spati
- Page 109 and 110:
groundwater degradation, seawater i
- Page 111 and 112:
approach to estimate soil water con
- Page 113 and 114:
Norouzi, HamidrezaLand Surface Char
- Page 115 and 116:
Painter, Thomas H.The JPL Airborne
- Page 117 and 118:
Pavelsky, Tamlin M.Continuous River
- Page 119 and 120:
interferometric synthetic aperture
- Page 121 and 122:
elevant satellite missions, such as
- Page 123 and 124:
support decision-making related to
- Page 125 and 126:
oth the quantification of human wat
- Page 127 and 128:
parameter inversion of the time inv
- Page 129 and 130:
ground-based observational forcing
- Page 131 and 132:
Selkowitz, DavidExploring Landsat-d
- Page 133 and 134:
Shahroudi, NargesMicrowave Emissivi
- Page 135 and 136:
well as subsurface hydrological con
- Page 137 and 138:
Sturm, MatthewRemote Sensing and Gr
- Page 139 and 140:
Sutanudjaja, Edwin H.Using space-bo
- Page 141 and 142:
which can be monitored as an indica
- Page 143 and 144:
tools and methods to address one of
- Page 145 and 146:
Vanderjagt, Benjamin J.How sub-pixe
- Page 147 and 148:
Vila, Daniel A.Satellite Rainfall R
- Page 149 and 150:
and landuse sustainability. In this
- Page 151 and 152:
e very significant as seepage occur
- Page 153 and 154:
Wood, Eric F.Challenges in Developi
- Page 155 and 156:
Xie, PingpingGauge - Satellite Merg
- Page 157 and 158:
Yebra, MartaRemote sensing canopy c
- Page 159 and 160:
used. PIHM has ability to simulate