dem<strong>on</strong>strate that effective roughness parameters are apromising tool for soil moisture retrieval, both for bare soilsand soils underlying wheat vegetati<strong>on</strong> throughout <strong>the</strong> entiregrowth cycle.Lin, Yao-Cheng<strong>Remote</strong> <strong>Sensing</strong> <strong>of</strong> Soil Moisture with Signals <strong>of</strong>OpportunityLin, Yao-Cheng 1 ; Garris<strong>on</strong>, James 1 ; Cherkauer, Keith 11. Purdue university, West Lafayette, IN, USAAbstract Measurement <strong>of</strong> soil moisture is very essentialfor studying <strong>the</strong> hydrological cycle. Passive microwaveradiometry is <strong>the</strong> most mature technology for <strong>the</strong> remotesensing <strong>of</strong> soil moisture, as dem<strong>on</strong>strated <strong>on</strong> ESA’s SMOSsatellite and <strong>the</strong> upcoming SMAP missi<strong>on</strong> from NASA. L-band (1.4GHz) is <strong>the</strong> frequency used for <strong>the</strong>semeasurements, a compromise between <strong>the</strong> required antennasize and <strong>the</strong> sensitivity to soil moisture. The frequenciesselected for SMOS and SMAP also enjoy str<strong>on</strong>g isolati<strong>on</strong>from radio frequency interference (RFI) in bands protectedfor radio astr<strong>on</strong>omy. L-band radiometry, however, <strong>on</strong>lysenses <strong>the</strong> moisture within <strong>the</strong> top few cm <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> soil andrequires a relatively large antenna to meet requirements <strong>on</strong>surface resoluti<strong>on</strong>. Recently, alternative approaches tomeasure soil moisture, through reflectometry <strong>of</strong> GlobalNavigati<strong>on</strong> Satellite System (GNSS-R) signals have beendem<strong>on</strong>strated, both from airborne receivers and groundbasedtowers. This paper will present a study <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong>extensi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> reflectometry techniques to o<strong>the</strong>r satellitetransmissi<strong>on</strong>s, so-called “signals <strong>of</strong> opportunity” (SoOp).Recent experiments in ocean remote sensing have shownthat <strong>the</strong> methods developed for GNSS-R can be applied tosome digital satellite transmissi<strong>on</strong>, dem<strong>on</strong>strated <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> S-band (2.3 GHz) signals from <strong>the</strong> XM radio satellites.Presently, an experiment is being prepared to test <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong>SoOp for soil moisture sensing, making use <strong>of</strong> high-powersatellite transmissi<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> frequencies both above and belowthose protected in L-band. This combinati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> frequencieswould allow sensitivity at multiple soil depths. The crosscorrelati<strong>on</strong>techniques inherent in GNSS-R methods are alsovery robust against RFI. This experiment will obtain directand reflected measurements from a set <strong>of</strong> antennas installed<strong>on</strong> a tower at a height <strong>of</strong> 30-35 meters. In situ sensors will beinstalled in <strong>the</strong> soil, at <strong>the</strong> locati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> specular reflecti<strong>on</strong>point, at various depths to provide calibrati<strong>on</strong> as close aspossible to <strong>the</strong> reflectivity measurement. In thispresentati<strong>on</strong>, we will present <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>oretical background <strong>of</strong>SoOp remote sensing <strong>of</strong> soil moisture, <strong>the</strong> expectedperformance <strong>of</strong> this technique, and <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>field experiment.Link, PercyVariability <strong>of</strong> oceanic and terrestrial water vaporsources in <strong>the</strong> Amaz<strong>on</strong> Basin: An investigati<strong>on</strong>using TES satellite and MERRA reanalysis atvarying temporal resoluti<strong>on</strong>sLink, Percy 1 ; Goldner, Aar<strong>on</strong> 2 ; Whadcoat, Siobhan 3 ; Fiorella,Rich 41. Earth and Planetary Science, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA,USA2. Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Purdue University, WestLafayette, IN, USA3. Earth Sciences, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, USA4. Earth and Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Sciences, University <strong>of</strong>Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USAPrecipitati<strong>on</strong> in <strong>the</strong> Amaz<strong>on</strong> regi<strong>on</strong> depends <strong>on</strong> both <strong>the</strong>large-scale circulati<strong>on</strong> (Hadley and Walker cells) and local- toregi<strong>on</strong>al-scale dynamics <strong>of</strong> evapotranspirati<strong>on</strong>, whichrecycles moisture from <strong>the</strong> land surface. We will use remotelysensed observati<strong>on</strong>s to investigate <strong>the</strong> sources <strong>of</strong>atmospheric water vapor over <strong>the</strong> Amaz<strong>on</strong> Basin and toexamine <strong>the</strong> relative c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> oceanic and terrestrialwater vapor sources. By comparing isotopic data from <strong>the</strong>Tropospheric Emissi<strong>on</strong> Spectrometer (TES) with ModernEra Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applicati<strong>on</strong>s(MERRA) reanalysis data, we will investigate <strong>the</strong> spatial andtemporal variability <strong>of</strong> water vapor sources and <strong>the</strong> factorsthat drive <strong>the</strong> variability. We will focus <strong>on</strong> two timescales. In<strong>the</strong> first, we will analyze individual storm tracks as <strong>the</strong>ymove west across <strong>the</strong> basin to study <strong>the</strong> impacts <strong>of</strong> waterrecycling <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> isotopic signature <strong>of</strong> vapor <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> air mass.In <strong>the</strong> sec<strong>on</strong>d, we will analyze seas<strong>on</strong>al climatologies toc<strong>on</strong>strain interannual variability. From this perspective, wewill investigate <strong>the</strong> sources <strong>of</strong> variability, such as <strong>the</strong> El NiñoSou<strong>the</strong>rn Oscillati<strong>on</strong> (ENSO), shown by <strong>the</strong> climatologies.Using high resoluti<strong>on</strong> TES data, we will isolate isotopicshifts over <strong>the</strong> Amaz<strong>on</strong> regi<strong>on</strong> in comparis<strong>on</strong> to <strong>the</strong> MERRAreanalysis, which should describe <strong>the</strong> dynamics c<strong>on</strong>trolling<strong>the</strong> flux <strong>of</strong> moisture into <strong>the</strong> regi<strong>on</strong>. This study will exploreat very high temporal resoluti<strong>on</strong> how precipitati<strong>on</strong> andisotopic c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s evolve during El Niño and La Niñaevents, and during years when equatorial Pacific sea surfacetemperatures are in <strong>the</strong>ir neutral mode. The use <strong>of</strong> highresoluti<strong>on</strong> observati<strong>on</strong>al data should help determine <strong>the</strong>sources <strong>of</strong> moisture in <strong>the</strong> Amaz<strong>on</strong> regi<strong>on</strong> and how <strong>the</strong>sesources shift during El Niño and La Niña.List<strong>on</strong>, Glen E.An Improved Global Snow Classificati<strong>on</strong> Datasetfor Hydrologic Applicati<strong>on</strong>sList<strong>on</strong>, Glen E. 1 ; Sturm, Mat<strong>the</strong>w 21. Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA2. U. S. Army Cold Regi<strong>on</strong>s Research and EngineeringLaboratory, Ft. Wainwright, AK, USAOut <strong>of</strong> a need to improve our descripti<strong>on</strong> andunderstanding <strong>of</strong> snow covers found around <strong>the</strong> world,92
Sturm et al. (1995) introduced a seas<strong>on</strong>al snow coverclassificati<strong>on</strong> system for local to global applicati<strong>on</strong>s. It hasseen c<strong>on</strong>siderable use since its initial development, but <strong>the</strong>original dataset describing <strong>the</strong> global distributi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> snowclasses was limited by its ~50 km spatial resoluti<strong>on</strong>.C<strong>on</strong>sequently, it could not be used in high-resoluti<strong>on</strong>applicati<strong>on</strong>s. The latest available fine-scale atmosphericforcing, topography, and land cover datasets were used torecalculate <strong>the</strong> snow classes <strong>on</strong> a global ~1 km grid. Thisnew resoluti<strong>on</strong> greatly increases <strong>the</strong> accuracy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> systemand opens <strong>the</strong> door for additi<strong>on</strong>al uses. Here we provide asummary <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> new dataset and example applicati<strong>on</strong>s thatinclude: 1) defining snow parameter values for regi<strong>on</strong>al andglobal snow-process and climate modeling at fine spatialscales, 2) defining parameter values to enhance snow remotesensingalgorithms, 3) categorizing and/or stratifying fieldmeasurements and/or model outputs, and 4) definingparameter values for snow-property models such as depthdensityrelati<strong>on</strong>ships, again at real landscape scales. See <strong>the</strong>SnowNet website (www.ipysnow.net) for access to <strong>the</strong> newclassificati<strong>on</strong> system.Liu, Huid<strong>on</strong>gValidati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> modeled lake water level variati<strong>on</strong>sdue to changing climate, <strong>the</strong>rmal variati<strong>on</strong>s andhuman activities using satellite observati<strong>on</strong>sLiu, Huid<strong>on</strong>g 1 ; Famiglietti, James S. 1, 2 ; Subin, Zachary M. 3, 41. Earth System Science, Univ. <strong>of</strong> California, Irvine, Irvine,CA, USA2. UC Center for Hydrologic Modeling, University <strong>of</strong>California, Irvine, CA, USA3. Energy & Resources Group, University <strong>of</strong> California,Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA4. Earth Sciences Divisi<strong>on</strong>, Lawrence Berkeley Nati<strong>on</strong>alLaboratory, Berkeley, CA, USALake level variati<strong>on</strong>s are mainly driven by changingclimate, and can also be altered by human regulati<strong>on</strong>s suchas dams, diversi<strong>on</strong>s and dredging activities. In this study,lakes are included in a coupled routing model andcatchment-based land surface model (CHARMS), which ismodified from <strong>the</strong> land-surface comp<strong>on</strong>ent (CLM4) <strong>of</strong> anEarth system model (CESM1). In <strong>the</strong> routing scheme, lakesare c<strong>on</strong>nected with rivers using upstream/downstreamrelati<strong>on</strong>ships in a lake basin. Evaporati<strong>on</strong>, precipitati<strong>on</strong>, andriver run<strong>of</strong>f are modeled in order to close <strong>the</strong> lake waterbudget. However, <strong>the</strong> original lake model in CLM4 poorlypredicts <strong>the</strong> lake temperature, which highly affects <strong>the</strong>evaporati<strong>on</strong> and surface energy fluxes. Using an improvedlake model (CLM4-LISSS) <strong>the</strong> lake water temperature andsurface energy flux are better predicted. This new versi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong>CHARMS is tested <strong>on</strong> several large lakes around <strong>the</strong> world(e.g., <strong>the</strong> Great Lakes, and Lake Victoria) to evaluate itsperformance in different climate z<strong>on</strong>es. The impacts <strong>of</strong>human regulati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> lakes will be included as a term in <strong>the</strong>outflow. Modeled lake level time series are compared withsatellite altimetry. In order to test <strong>the</strong> ability <strong>of</strong> CHARMS tosimulating <strong>the</strong> variati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> lake temperature, we compare<strong>the</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>rmal expansi<strong>on</strong> calculated from modeledlake temperature with <strong>the</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>rmal expansi<strong>on</strong>determined from Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment(GRACE) and satellite altimetry data.Liu, ZhaoAn Explicit Representati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> High Resoluti<strong>on</strong> RiverNetworks using a Catchment-based Land SurfaceModel with <strong>the</strong> NHDPlus dataset for CaliforniaRegi<strong>on</strong>Liu, Zhao 2 ; Kim, HyungJun 1 ; Famiglietti, James 1, 21. UC Center for Hydrologic Modeling, Univ. <strong>of</strong> California,Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA2. Dept. <strong>of</strong> Earth System Science, Univ. <strong>of</strong> California, Irvine,Irvine, CA, USAThe main motivati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> this study is to characterize howaccurately we can estimate river discharge, river depth andinundati<strong>on</strong> extent using an explicit representati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>river network with a catchment-based hydrological androuting modeling system (CHARMS) framework. Here wepresent a macroscale implementati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> CHARMS overCalifornia. There are two main comp<strong>on</strong>ents in CHARMS: aland surface model based <strong>on</strong> Nati<strong>on</strong>al Center AtmosphericResearch Community Land Model (CLM) 4.0, which ismodified for implementati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> a catchment template; anda river routing model that c<strong>on</strong>siders <strong>the</strong> water transport <strong>of</strong>each river reach. The river network is upscaled from <strong>the</strong>Nati<strong>on</strong>al Hydrography Dataset Plus (NHDPlus) to <strong>the</strong>Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC8) river basins. Both l<strong>on</strong>g-termm<strong>on</strong>thly and daily streamflow simulati<strong>on</strong> are generated andshow reas<strong>on</strong>able results compared with gage observati<strong>on</strong>s.With river cross-secti<strong>on</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>ile informati<strong>on</strong> derived fromempirical relati<strong>on</strong>ships between channel dimensi<strong>on</strong>s anddrainage area, river depth and floodplain extent associatedwith each river reach are also explicitly represented. Resultshave implicati<strong>on</strong>s for assimilati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> surface water altimetryand for implementati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> approach at <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>tinentalscale.Lovejoy, ShaunThe Space-time variability <strong>of</strong> precipitati<strong>on</strong> frommillimeters to planetary scales, from hours tocenturies: emergent laws and multifractal cascadesLovejoy, Shaun 1 ; Schertzer, Daniel 21. Dept Physics, McGill Univ, M<strong>on</strong>treal, QC, Canada2. LEESU, École des P<strong>on</strong>ts ParisTech, Université Paris-Est,Marne-la-Vallée, FrancePrecipitati<strong>on</strong> is <strong>the</strong> key input field into hydrologicalsystems and models; it displays extreme variability withcomplex structures embedded within structures, from dropto planetary scales in space and from millisec<strong>on</strong>ds tomillennia in time. Numerous applicati<strong>on</strong>s including remotesensing require detailed hypo<strong>the</strong>ses about its space-timevariability: comm<strong>on</strong>ly <strong>the</strong>y assume (unrealistically) that <strong>the</strong>subsensor structure is homogeneous. The <strong>on</strong>ly hope for93
- Page 5 and 6:
SCIENTIFIC PROGRAMSUNDAY, 19 FEBRUA
- Page 7 and 8:
1600h - 1900hMM-1MM-2MM-3MM-4MM-5MM
- Page 9 and 10:
GM-7GM-8GM-9GM-10GM-11GM-12GM-13160
- Page 11 and 12:
EM-25EM-26EM-27EM-28EM-29EM-301600h
- Page 13 and 14:
SMM-8SMM-9SMM-10SMM-11SMM-12SMM-13S
- Page 15 and 16:
SCM-24SCM-251600h - 1900hPM-1PM-2PM
- Page 17 and 18:
1030h - 1200h1030h - 1200h1030h - 1
- Page 19 and 20:
ET-13ET-14ET-15ET-16ET-17ET-18ET-19
- Page 21 and 22:
SWT-19SWT-201600h - 1900hSMT-1SMT-2
- Page 23 and 24:
SCT-14SCT-15SCT-16SCT-17SCT-18SCT-1
- Page 25 and 26:
MT-2MT-3MT-4MT-5MT-6MT-7MT-8MT-9MT-
- Page 27 and 28:
1330h - 1530h1530h - 1600h1600h - 1
- Page 29 and 30:
esilience to hydrological hazards a
- Page 31 and 32:
Alfieri, Joseph G.The Factors Influ
- Page 33 and 34:
Montana and Oregon. Other applicati
- Page 35 and 36:
accuracy of snow derivation from si
- Page 37 and 38:
seasonal trends, and integrate clou
- Page 40 and 41:
a single mission, the phrase “nea
- Page 42 and 43: climate and land surface unaccounte
- Page 44 and 45: esolution lidar-derived DEM was com
- Page 46 and 47: further verified that even for conv
- Page 48 and 49: underway and its utility can be ass
- Page 50 and 51: Courault, DominiqueAssessment of mo
- Page 52 and 53: used three Landsat-5 TM images (05/
- Page 55: storage change solutions in the for
- Page 59 and 60: Famiglietti, James S.Getting Real A
- Page 61 and 62: can be thought of as operating in t
- Page 63 and 64: mission and will address the follow
- Page 65 and 66: Gan, Thian Y.Soil Moisture Retrieva
- Page 67 and 68: match the two sets of estimates. Th
- Page 69 and 70: producing CGF snow cover products.
- Page 71 and 72: performance of the AWRA-L model for
- Page 73 and 74: oth local and regional hydrology. T
- Page 75 and 76: Euphorbia heterandena, and Echinops
- Page 77 and 78: the effectiveness of this calibrati
- Page 79 and 80: presents challenges to the validati
- Page 81 and 82: long period time (1976-2010) was co
- Page 83 and 84: has more improved resolution ( ) to
- Page 85 and 86: in the flow over the floodplain ari
- Page 87 and 88: fraction of the fresh water resourc
- Page 89 and 90: to determine the source of the wate
- Page 91: hydrologists, was initially assigne
- Page 95 and 96: calendar day are then truncated and
- Page 97 and 98: climate associated with hydrologica
- Page 99 and 100: California Institute of Technology
- Page 101 and 102: egion in Northern California that i
- Page 103 and 104: Moller, DelwynTopographic Mapping o
- Page 105 and 106: obtained from the Fifth Microwave W
- Page 107 and 108: a constraint that is observed spati
- Page 109 and 110: groundwater degradation, seawater i
- Page 111 and 112: approach to estimate soil water con
- Page 113 and 114: Norouzi, HamidrezaLand Surface Char
- Page 115 and 116: Painter, Thomas H.The JPL Airborne
- Page 117 and 118: Pavelsky, Tamlin M.Continuous River
- Page 119 and 120: interferometric synthetic aperture
- Page 121 and 122: elevant satellite missions, such as
- Page 123 and 124: support decision-making related to
- Page 125 and 126: oth the quantification of human wat
- Page 127 and 128: parameter inversion of the time inv
- Page 129 and 130: ground-based observational forcing
- Page 131 and 132: Selkowitz, DavidExploring Landsat-d
- Page 133 and 134: Shahroudi, NargesMicrowave Emissivi
- Page 135 and 136: well as subsurface hydrological con
- Page 137 and 138: Sturm, MatthewRemote Sensing and Gr
- Page 139 and 140: Sutanudjaja, Edwin H.Using space-bo
- Page 141 and 142: which can be monitored as an indica
- Page 143 and 144:
tools and methods to address one of
- Page 145 and 146:
Vanderjagt, Benjamin J.How sub-pixe
- Page 147 and 148:
Vila, Daniel A.Satellite Rainfall R
- Page 149 and 150:
and landuse sustainability. In this
- Page 151 and 152:
e very significant as seepage occur
- Page 153 and 154:
Wood, Eric F.Challenges in Developi
- Page 155 and 156:
Xie, PingpingGauge - Satellite Merg
- Page 157 and 158:
Yebra, MartaRemote sensing canopy c
- Page 159 and 160:
used. PIHM has ability to simulate