<strong>Roman</strong> <strong>Catholic</strong> <strong>Faithful</strong>, Inc. / AMDG May 2004 <strong>Albany</strong> newsletter<strong>The</strong> Death of <strong>Catholic</strong>ism <strong>in</strong> <strong>Albany</strong>By Stephen BradyWarn<strong>in</strong>g: It is assumed that <strong>in</strong>dividuals read<strong>in</strong>g this report are true <strong>Catholic</strong>s. Those who reject evenone of the truths of the <strong>Catholic</strong> faith are, by def<strong>in</strong>ition, not <strong>Catholic</strong> and therefore could not possiblycomprehend the depravity of Bishop Howard Hubbard’s actions.Saturday, February 14, 2004, Father John M<strong>in</strong>kler left a message on my voice mail ask<strong>in</strong>g me to help himwith Bishop Howard Hubbard. Unfortunately, I did not check my voice mail until Monday morn<strong>in</strong>g and Fr. M<strong>in</strong>klerwas already dead.My first trip to <strong>Albany</strong> was November 24, 1996. I was <strong>in</strong>vited by a group of <strong>Catholic</strong>s from Oneonta NewYork. <strong>The</strong> group was headed by Mrs. Rita Armstrong. Rita and her friends were concerned about the condition of theChurch <strong>in</strong> <strong>Albany</strong> and wanted RCF’s help.After meet<strong>in</strong>g with local <strong>Catholic</strong>s, who provided me with a list of abuses too long to mention here, I attendedan even<strong>in</strong>g “college Mass” at St. Mary’s <strong>in</strong> Oneonta. Bishop Howard Hubbard celebrated Mass with Fr. BrianRaiche present.<strong>The</strong> first th<strong>in</strong>g that caught my attention once I arrived at the parish for Mass was a sign posted on the <strong>in</strong>sidedoor of St. Mary’s. <strong>The</strong> sign on the door stated: “if you want to be an extraord<strong>in</strong>ary m<strong>in</strong>ister, show up 15 m<strong>in</strong>utesbefore Mass.” <strong>The</strong> sign made it clear that anyone who wished to do so could distribute the Eucharist, and thosepriests about to celebrate Mass , at the very least, had little if any respect for and possibly no belief <strong>in</strong> the Real Presence.Dur<strong>in</strong>g Mass six women dressed <strong>in</strong> white gowns danced around the Altar and through the sanctuary *. It wasa scandal. Prior to Mass I had spoken to parishioners and was <strong>in</strong>formed that the bread used at Mass was made by theparishioners and <strong>in</strong>cluded sugar and honey as well as other <strong>in</strong>gredients that, accord<strong>in</strong>g to Church law, rendered theMass <strong>in</strong>valid.* <strong>The</strong> bread was of such a texture that Bishop Hubbard struggled to tear it apart at this pretend Mass.<strong>The</strong> parish was packed with impressionable college kids who witnessed this disgrace perpetrated by their bishop.On the way out after the service a priest with me confronted the Bishop about his use of <strong>in</strong>valid matter, onlyto be brushed off by assurances from Hubbard that all was well.By participat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> such a scandalous, sacrilegious display <strong>in</strong> a <strong>Catholic</strong> Church, Bishop Howard Hubbardexposes himself as a fraud. He could not do such th<strong>in</strong>gs and other th<strong>in</strong>gs documented <strong>in</strong> this issue of AMDG and believe<strong>in</strong> the Real Presence, mortal s<strong>in</strong>, salvation of souls, or the existence of Hell. Hubbard is not fit to serve!I received a phone call from Father John M<strong>in</strong>kler on January 8, 2001. He called to <strong>in</strong>form me that he wassend<strong>in</strong>g me a copy of the 1995 report that he prepared at the request of Card<strong>in</strong>al O’Connor of New York. <strong>The</strong> report* “DANCING, LITURGICAL. Mov<strong>in</strong>g rhythmically to music as part of a religious ceremony... Here danc<strong>in</strong>g is tied <strong>in</strong>with love, with diversion, with profaneness, with unbridl<strong>in</strong>g of the senses; such danc<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong> general, is not pure. For thatreason it cannot be <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong>to liturgical celebrations of any k<strong>in</strong>d whatever." “<strong>The</strong> Modern <strong>Catholic</strong> Dictionary" byFr. John A. Hardon, S.J.* For VALID CONSECRATION the hosts must be: * made of wheaten flour, * mixed with pure natural water, * baked<strong>in</strong> an oven, or between two heated iron moulds, and * they must not be corrupted (Miss. Rom., De Defectibus, III, 1).4
<strong>Roman</strong> <strong>Catholic</strong> <strong>Faithful</strong>, Inc. / AMDG May 2004 <strong>Albany</strong> newsletterdetailed problems with<strong>in</strong> the <strong>Albany</strong> Diocese, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g allegations that Hubbard had engaged <strong>in</strong> homosexual activitywith clergy. <strong>The</strong> report named names. Father felt RCF could use the <strong>in</strong>formation to help <strong>in</strong> our <strong>in</strong>vestigation of Hubbard.Several days later I received the report along with a signed cover letter <strong>in</strong> which Fr. M<strong>in</strong>kler updated the 1995report with additional <strong>in</strong>formation, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the names of <strong>Albany</strong> clergy who were alleged to have engaged <strong>in</strong> homosexualactivity and/or been accused of abuse. Father made it clear that he wrote the report and asked that I never makehis name public. Fr. M<strong>in</strong>kler was afraid of what Hubbard might do if he found out that he (M<strong>in</strong>kler) had gathered <strong>in</strong>formationfor the 1995 report. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Father, Card<strong>in</strong>al O’Connor was frustrated because of the fact that Romewould not remove Hubbard.I realize that it is difficult for some <strong>Catholic</strong>s to believe that a bishop could be corrupt or engage <strong>in</strong> homosexualactivity. One need only look to recent news reports to realize just how bad the situation is with<strong>in</strong> the Church.<strong>The</strong> late Fr. John Hardon worked with our organization, on a limited basis, before his death. What I remembermost about Fr. Hardon was his statement that, “accord<strong>in</strong>g to my Vatican superiors, unless the laity do someth<strong>in</strong>g,one diocese after another will be lost. And what does that tell you? <strong>The</strong> Bishops are the problem. Let me give a fewexamples of corrupt bishops. For more <strong>in</strong>formation refer to our web site www.rcf.org or request back copies of ournewsletter Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam (AMDG).*Bishop Patrick Ziemann. He resigned <strong>in</strong> July 21, 1999 after admitt<strong>in</strong>g to a consensual sexual relationshipwith a priest. <strong>The</strong> priest claimed he was coerced by Ziemann to engage <strong>in</strong> sexual activity. When Bishop Ziemann resigned,we had <strong>in</strong> our possession, correspondence between a family <strong>in</strong> the Orange, California Diocese and their thenbishopMacfarland from five years earlier. <strong>The</strong> Bishop had been notified that Ziemann had made unwanted sexualadvances towards the family’s son as well as other boys. When the then-Bishop of Orange Diocese responded to thisfamily with a letter, he <strong>in</strong>formed them that he did not believe what they were say<strong>in</strong>g, and he rem<strong>in</strong>ded them that theycould face legal action for say<strong>in</strong>g such th<strong>in</strong>gs. <strong>The</strong> family, fear<strong>in</strong>g legal action aga<strong>in</strong>st them, dropped the issue. RCFlater learned that Bishop Ziemann, after his resignation, was giv<strong>in</strong>g church retreats <strong>in</strong> St. David, Arizona area.* Bishop Keith Symons of West Palm Beach, Florida, resigned June 2, 1998. This is a particularly troubl<strong>in</strong>gcase because of who followed Bishop Symons <strong>in</strong> that diocese. Bishop Symons acknowledged sexual contact with atleast five boys while he was a priest. One of them, he admitted, was a long-term relationship. I don’t know how youcall hav<strong>in</strong>g sex with a m<strong>in</strong>or a long-term relationship.<strong>The</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g Symons’ abuse was made known to the hierarchy at least a year earlier accord<strong>in</strong>gto press reports. It wasn’t until one victim went to the press that action was taken and Symons resigned. Bishop Symonswas later found to be lead<strong>in</strong>g retreats <strong>in</strong> the Lans<strong>in</strong>g Michigan Diocese. One Michigan bishop referred to Symonsas a “wounded healer.”*Bishop Anthony J. O’Connell replaced Bishop Symons <strong>in</strong> West Palm Beach, Florida. <strong>The</strong> local <strong>Catholic</strong>showever, were not told that, <strong>in</strong> 1996, a $125,000 settlement was paid by the Jefferson City, Missouri, Diocese(O’Connell’s home diocese), to an abuse victim of Bishop O’Connell’s. <strong>The</strong> abuse took place when O’Connell was apriest <strong>in</strong> the diocese of Jefferson City, Mo. It was later learned that there were other victims and on March 8, 2002Bishop O’Connell resigned.Bishop O’Connell was appo<strong>in</strong>ted to the Diocese of West Palm Beach, a diocese that had already sufferedthrough one abusive bishop, even though the hierarchy knew that he was a child abuser. <strong>The</strong> then Archbishop of St.Louis, Just<strong>in</strong> Rigali, allowed O'Connell to be appo<strong>in</strong>ted Bishop. So don’t let anyone excuse a bishop’s actions by say<strong>in</strong>g,“the Pope appo<strong>in</strong>ted him so he must be a good bishop.”*When Archbishop Rembert Weakland from Milwaukee, Wiscons<strong>in</strong> resigned at age 75, we learned that hehad paid $400,000 of diocesan funds to his former boyfriend, <strong>in</strong> an effort to keep his homosexual relationship a secret.5
- Page 1 and 2: Roman Catholic Faithful, Inc. / AMD
- Page 3: Roman Catholic Faithful, Inc. / AMD
- Page 7 and 8: Roman Catholic Faithful, Inc. / AMD
- Page 9 and 10: Roman Catholic Faithful, Inc. / AMD
- Page 11 and 12: Roman Catholic Faithful, Inc. / AMD
- Page 13 and 14: Roman Catholic Faithful, Inc. / AMD
- Page 15 and 16: Roman Catholic Faithful, Inc. / AMD
- Page 17 and 18: Roman Catholic Faithful, Inc. / AMD
- Page 19 and 20: Roman Catholic Faithful, Inc. / AMD
- Page 21 and 22: Roman Catholic Faithful, Inc. / AMD
- Page 23 and 24: Roman Catholic Faithful, Inc. / AMD
- Page 25 and 26: Roman Catholic Faithful, Inc. / AMD
- Page 27 and 28: Roman Catholic Faithful, Inc. / AMD
- Page 29 and 30: Roman Catholic Faithful, Inc. / AMD
- Page 31 and 32: Roman Catholic Faithful, Inc. / AMD
- Page 33 and 34: Roman Catholic Faithful, Inc. / AMD
- Page 35 and 36: Roman Catholic Faithful, Inc. / AMD
- Page 37 and 38: Roman Catholic Faithful, Inc. / AMD
- Page 39 and 40: Roman Catholic Faithful, Inc. / AMD
- Page 41 and 42: Roman Catholic Faithful, Inc. / AMD
- Page 43 and 44: Roman Catholic Faithful, Inc. / AMD
- Page 45 and 46: Roman Catholic Faithful, Inc. / AMD
- Page 47 and 48: Roman Catholic Faithful, Inc. / AMD
- Page 49 and 50: Roman Catholic Faithful, Inc. / AMD
- Page 51 and 52: Roman Catholic Faithful, Inc. / AMD
- Page 53 and 54: Roman Catholic Faithful, Inc. / AMD
- Page 55 and 56:
Roman Catholic Faithful, Inc. / AMD
- Page 57 and 58:
Roman Catholic Faithful, Inc. / AMD
- Page 59 and 60:
Roman Catholic Faithful, Inc. / AMD
- Page 61 and 62:
Roman Catholic Faithful, Inc. / AMD
- Page 63 and 64:
Roman Catholic Faithful, Inc. / AMD
- Page 65 and 66:
Roman Catholic Faithful, Inc. / AMD
- Page 67 and 68:
Roman Catholic Faithful, Inc. / AMD
- Page 69 and 70:
Roman Catholic Faithful, Inc. / AMD
- Page 71 and 72:
Roman Catholic Faithful, Inc. / AMD