11.07.2015 Views

IMAGING & ONCOLOGY - Society of Radiographers

IMAGING & ONCOLOGY - Society of Radiographers

IMAGING & ONCOLOGY - Society of Radiographers

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

EDITORIAL 5Leading by exampleTaking over last autumn from Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Audrey Paterson as theEditor <strong>of</strong> Imaging & Oncology was one <strong>of</strong> the high points <strong>of</strong> my year.I could not wait to manage and infl uence a publication <strong>of</strong> which Ihad been a fan since its inception. However, I did wonder what onearth I would do if no-one would write for me. Audrey had, for fi veyears, produced a superb collection <strong>of</strong> top drawer manuscripts, butI’m not Audrey. Certainly the contemporary nature <strong>of</strong> the publicationmeant that I had no papers to ‘inherit’ for this year’s issue. Andmost pr<strong>of</strong>essionals in healthcare would agree that their workingenvironment is getting busier, which naturally means that ‘nonessential’activity is more likely to be sacrifi ced. The prospect <strong>of</strong> mywriting ten articles by fi ctitious authors passed through my mind andsuddenly I regretted my new editorial role…Eight months on and my fears were unfounded, for here is afascinating collection <strong>of</strong> articles written by some <strong>of</strong> our best expertsin their fi eld. Some focus on cutting-edge scientifi c breakthroughsand technical innovations, some on educational dilemmas and issuesrelating to sustainable service delivery, and others consider ethicaldimensions which affect our pr<strong>of</strong>essions. At fi rst glance, this eclecticmix may appear to have little in common other than that eachcontains high quality information. However, look closer and you willsee that all these authors are leading, either with their practice,their ideas, or both. They have considered the future and have boldmessages for our imaging and oncology community. This, <strong>of</strong> course,lies at the heart <strong>of</strong> why they wanted to write for this issue.I am certain that some <strong>of</strong> the predictions and recommendationscontained in these pages will contribute to shaping future servicesin the UK. And that managers and shapers <strong>of</strong> our pr<strong>of</strong>essions willconsider some <strong>of</strong> these concepts, perhaps modify them further, butthen apply them within their own setting, ultimately for the good <strong>of</strong>the patient.If you enjoy this year’s issue <strong>of</strong> Imaging & Oncology as much as Ihave, then you will be very satisfi ed indeed. To use an old cliché,it really does contain something to interest everyone regardless<strong>of</strong> their specialty, and, arguably, this is because <strong>of</strong> the marvellouscontributions from our medical and non-medical colleagues. Isincerely hope this publication continues to be a forum for suchcollaboration.Please let me know your opinion <strong>of</strong> this year’s collection sinceonly then can I deliver more <strong>of</strong> what interests you next year. I lookforward to hearing your suggestions for improvement and also forfuture topics.Hazel Edwards2010<strong>IMAGING</strong> &<strong>ONCOLOGY</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!