Engineering Disasters

More documents

Recommendations

Info

$(Microsoft PowerPoint - Topic 4.ppt [Mode de compatibilit\351])$

Engineering DisastersSome seek to assign blame fordisasters on others; politicians,managers, social scientists, and soon.The Challenger disaster is a case in point.Some remind us that the Thiokolengineers recommended not flying themission precisely because of the dangerto the fuel cell o-ringsorings-managers overrodetheir recommendation..
Engineering Disastersif engineers want to assume thecredit for projects consideredtriumphs,shouldn't they alsoassume responsibility for projectsthat go wrong?
Page 1 and 2: PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE/OCCUPATIONAL
Page 3: Engineering DisastersPerhaps disast
Page 8 and 9: Words of Wisdom
Page 10: Liquefaction
Page 14 and 15: Quebec Bridge Failure75 lost livesI
Page 17 and 18: HARISSBURG BRIDGE FAILURE
Page 19 and 20: Bombe atomique (little boy) ayantse
Page 21 and 22: Nuclear power station
Page 23 and 24: CHERNOBYL DISASTERELECTRICAL, MECHA
Page 25 and 26: CONTAINMENT OFCHERNOBYL REACTOR
Page 27 and 28: Three Mile Island disaster
Page 29 and 30: UNION CARBIDS
Page 31 and 32: BhopalThe aftermath
Page 33 and 34: Disasters are realStadium Collapse
Page 35 and 36: CHINA Dam Failure
Page 38 and 39: Tower• Redundant Structures• Co
Page 40 and 41: Expect Unexpected
Page 42 and 43: Responsibility• Engineers have le
Page 44 and 45: BROTHERHOODAgricultural Engineering
Page 46 and 47: References• This presentation is

Engineering Disasters

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?