12.07.2015 Views

Terence McKenna--Lectures on Alchemy - Shroomery

Terence McKenna--Lectures on Alchemy - Shroomery

Terence McKenna--Lectures on Alchemy - Shroomery

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

taste of what alchemical thinking was about. Mercury takes the form of its c<strong>on</strong>tainer. If I pour mercury into acup, it takes the shape of the cup, if I pour it into a test tube, it takes the shape of the test tube. Thistaking the shape of its c<strong>on</strong>tainer is a quality of mind and yet here it is present in a flowing, silvery metal.The other thing is, mercury is a reflecting surface. You never see mercury, what you see is the world whichsurrounds it, which is perfectly reflected in its surface like a moving mirror, you see. And then if you've ever,as a child, I mean I have no idea how toxic this process is, but I spent a lot of time as a child hounding mygrandfather for his hearing aid batteries which I would then smash with a hammer and get the mercury out andcollect it in little bottles and carry it around with me. Well, the w<strong>on</strong>derful thing about mercury is when youpour it out <strong>on</strong> a surface and it beads up, then each bead of mercury becomes a little microcosm of the world. Andyet the mercury flows back together into a unity. Well, as a child I had not yet imbibed the assumpti<strong>on</strong>s and the<strong>on</strong>tology of science. I was functi<strong>on</strong>ing as an alchemist. For me, mercury was this fascinating magical substance<strong>on</strong>to which I could project the c<strong>on</strong>tents of my mind. And a child playing with mercury is an alchemist hard at work,no doubt about it.Well, so then, this is a phenomen<strong>on</strong> in the physical world and then mind is a phenomen<strong>on</strong> in the Cartesiandistincti<strong>on</strong>, which is between the Res Extensa and the Res Verins. This is the great splitting of the world intotwo parts. I remember Al W<strong>on</strong>g <strong>on</strong>ce said to me, we were talking about the yin yang symbol, and he said you knowthe interesting thing is not the yin or the yang, the interesting thing is the s shaped surface that runs betweenthem. And that s shaped surface is a river of alchemical mercury. Now, where the alchemists saw this river ofalchemical mercury is in the boundary between waking and sleeping. There is a place, not quite sleeping, notquite waking, and there there flows this river of alchemical mercury where you can project the c<strong>on</strong>tents of theunc<strong>on</strong>scious and you can read it back to yourself. This kind of thinking is c<strong>on</strong>founding to scientific thoughtwhere the effort is always to fix everything to a given identity and a given set of behaviors.Now, the other hermetic percepti<strong>on</strong> that is well illustrated by just thinking for a moment about mercury is thenoti<strong>on</strong>, and this is central to all hermetic thinking, of the microcosm and the macrocosm. That somehow the greatworld, the whole of the cosmos is reflected in the mystery of man, meaning men and women, it's reflected in themystery of the human mind/body interface. So, for an alchemist, it makes perfect sense to extrapolate from thisinternal, what we call internal psychological processes, to external processes in the world. That distincti<strong>on</strong>doesn't exist for the alchemist, and let me tell you, the l<strong>on</strong>ger I live the more I am c<strong>on</strong>vinced that this isabsolutely the truth.The myth of our society is the existential myth that we are cast into matter, that we are lost in a universe thathas no meaning for us, that we must make our meaning. This is what Sartre, Kierkegaard, all those people aresaying, that we must make our meaning. It reaches its most absurd expressi<strong>on</strong> in Sartre's statement that nature ismute. I mean, this is as far from alchemical thinking as you can possibly get because for the alchemist naturewas a great book, an open book to be read by putting nature through processes that revealed not <strong>on</strong>ly its innermechanics, but the inner mechanics of the artifex (pers<strong>on</strong> performing experiment)-the pers<strong>on</strong> working up<strong>on</strong> thematerial, in other words, the alchemist.Well, in other c<strong>on</strong>texts I've talked about the importance of language and how our world is made of language andpart of the problem in understanding alchemy is that the language is slipping out of our reach. We are socompletely imbued with the Cartesian categories of the Res Verins, the world of thought, and the Res Extensia,the world of three dimensi<strong>on</strong>al space, and causality, and the c<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> of matter and energy, and so forth thatin order to do more than carry out a kind of scholarship of alchemy we have to create an alchemical language, ora field in which alchemical language can take place. Some of you may have been with me a couple of weeks ago in3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!