Management of Rectal Prolapse, and Common Anorectal Conditions
Management of Rectal Prolapse, and Common Anorectal Conditions
Management of Rectal Prolapse, and Common Anorectal Conditions
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Rectal</strong> <strong>Prolapse</strong>
Pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> Patients Young adultsOften found in psychiatric patients withchronic constipationAssociated with mental subnormality Elderly femaleMultiple vaginal deliveriesOften octogenarian+/– uterine prolapse
Aim <strong>of</strong> Treatment Primary objectiveEradicate the prolapse <strong>and</strong> improve thequality <strong>of</strong> life Secondary gain Improvement in continence <strong>and</strong> bowelfunction
Investigation in Elective Case Finding ppt. factor At least a flexible sigmoidoscopy Assessment <strong>of</strong> surgical risk (no effective nonoperativetreatment) <strong>Anorectal</strong> manometry, pudendal nerve test Predicts functional outcome after surgery
Elective Presentation :Operative TreatmentAbdominalLaparoscopic Vs OpenRectopexyPerinealSutureProsthesis/ meshAnterior/ posteriorResectionMucosectomyAnoplasty+- resection+- pelvic floor repairN.B.: Abdominal procedures produce less recurrence Perineal operations have less morbidity (<strong>and</strong>mortality)
Perineal Procedures Thiersch Procedure Considered obsolete nowadays! Delorme Procedure The minimum you should do! Altemeier Operation(Perineal Proctosigmoidectomy)
Perineal Procedures :Delorme Procedure Mortality 0-4% Recurrence 4-38% (St Marks 12.5%)N.B.: Good for short prolapse Can be repeated if necessary
Perineal Procedures :Perineal Proctosigmoidectomy(Altemeier Procedure) Mortality 0-5%; complication: pelvic sepsis,leakage Recurrence 0-16% Best if combined with posterior levatorplasty Ideal for incarcerated <strong>and</strong> strangulated ones Difficult to perform for small prolapseDeen KL Br J Surg 1994:81: 302-304Wexner, Clevel<strong>and</strong> Clinic Florida; Archieves <strong>of</strong> Surgery; Jan 2005; 140,1
Abdominal Procedure Rectopexy Sutured Rectopexy Anterior resection alone Resection rectopexy (Frykman-Goldbery procedure) Laparoscopic Vs Open
Abdominal Procedure :Prosthesis or Mesh Rectopexy Makes use foreign materialto evoke more fibrous tissuereaction, examples Anterior Sling RectopexyRipstein Procedure Posterior Mesh repair‣ e.g. Wells OperationProblems: Increased pelvic sepsis <strong>and</strong> rectal stricture
Abdominal Procedure :Sutured Rectopexy No reported mortality Recurrence (majority 0-8%; ranges 0-27%) Variable response to constipationN.B.: Posterior mobilization to tip <strong>of</strong> coccyx Division <strong>of</strong> lateral ligaments on either sides
Abdominal Procedure :Resection Rectopexy Add 1% to mortality Recurrence 0-5% Majority has improved constipation
Abdominal Procedure :A ComparisonProcedureSuturedRectopexyMeshRectopexyResectionRectopexyRecurrence 0-8% 0-13% 0-5%Mortality 0% 0-2.8% 1-4%Complication rare 8-52% Up to 30%Continence improve improve improveConstipation variable Up to 42% improve
Laparoscopic ApproachRectopexy (sutured, stapled, posterior mesh, resection) Recurrence 0-10%As effective as open ( no long term difference)BenefitShorter post-op hospitalizationOverall reduction in costEarlier recoveryLess morbidityEarlier return to workN.B.: Laparoscopic approach is desirable because <strong>of</strong> Benign nature <strong>of</strong> the condition Patients are <strong>of</strong>ten at high surgical risk for laparotomy
Choice <strong>of</strong> Operation :IndividualizedAbdominal procedures are ideal for young fit patient<strong>and</strong> provide best chance <strong>of</strong> cureSutured rectopexy gives good resultCombination <strong>of</strong> a resection reduce constipationLaparoscopic approach provides similar results withless morbidityPerineal procedure for frail patients with extensiveco-morbidity, not fit for major abdominal surgery Perineal rectosigmoidectomy, combined withlevatorplasty gives better result than Delorme’soperation
Summary<strong>Rectal</strong> prolapse (Dx clinically)Emergency tx as indicatedFlexible sigmoidoscopy<strong>Anorectal</strong> manometry,pudendal nerve testAssess symptomatalogy, patientpr<strong>of</strong>ile & Stratify surgical riskConstipation?Incontinence?Young malesexually active?Length <strong>of</strong> prolapse?Good risk, fitVery high riskAbdominal proceduree.g. Laparoscopic resectionalsutured rectopexyPerineal proceduree.g. Delorme’s operation orAltemeier + levatorplasty
Haemorrhoids
Surgery Definite indication Severe bleeding not responding tosimple <strong>of</strong>fice procedures
Hemorrhoidectomy Preop. preparation GA Fleet enema ± Prophylactic antibiotics Facilitates day surgery Less AROU Allows better appreciation <strong>of</strong> anorectal ring Lithotomy vs Jack-knife No retractor Diathermy instead <strong>of</strong> scissors or sutureplication
Stapled Hemorrhoidectomy Becoming more popular in recent 10 years Involves transanal, circular stapling <strong>of</strong> redundantanorectal mucosa with a st<strong>and</strong>ard circularstapling device Basically a mucosal-reduction <strong>and</strong> fixationprocedure (C.W. Delorme’s or RBL) Reduces blood supply to anal cushionsN.B.: Beware <strong>of</strong> rectal performation <strong>and</strong>rectovaginal fistula in female patients
Advantages(Level 1 Evidence) Less pain Quicker return to work or normalactivities Shorter hospital stayN.B.: More than 15 RCTs
No Difference Ability to be done as day surgery Frequency <strong>of</strong> common post-operativecomplications
Limitations Insufficient data for grade 4 piles,external piles, or thrombosed piles(probably better for bleeding than forprolapse)
Thrombosed Hemorrhoids Natural history is that resolution beginsat around day 5 In many patients symptoms are cured bya severe ‘attack’ <strong>of</strong> thrombosis
<strong>Management</strong> <strong>of</strong>Thrombosed Hemorrhoids Severe pain requiring parenteral analgesia(usually onset < 5 days) Surgery Pain controllable with oral pain killers(usually onset ≧ 5days) Conservative
Operation onThrombosed Hemorrhoids Prophylactic antibiotics Anal stretch to disperse oedema No anal retractor Leave sufficient mucocutaneousbridges (tendency to overestimate) Evacuate thrombus from skin bridges
Anal Fissure
Primary Anal Fissure Longitudinal ulcer in lower-half <strong>of</strong> anal canal(the anoderm just distal to dentate line) 90% posterior; 10% anterior PathogenesisTrauma + ischemia due to high anal pressure(indolent ulcer)
Assessment in the Clinic P/E Gentle eversion <strong>of</strong> anus with limited digitalexam Feels the increased resting tone EUA + anoscopy <strong>and</strong> protoscopy might benecessary <strong>Anorectal</strong> manometry ▬ not indicated intypical case with first attack except History <strong>of</strong> impaired continence Low anal tone Previous anal surgery
DDX Fissures OFF the midline Ca anus (verge / canal) IBD TB ulcer HIV / Herpes Investigation (biopsy + anorectal manometry,serology, CBC, CRP, etc.) should ALWAYS beundertaken for Atypical symptom (e.g. incontinence) Multiple fissure or fissure atypical in location,appearance or configuration Refractory or recurrent fissure after apparentlyadequate treatmente.g. anterior fissure following labour in a woman whocomplains <strong>of</strong> flatus incontinence <strong>and</strong> liquid soiling endoanal USG — sphincter defect manometry — decreased pressure needs sphincter repair <strong>and</strong> not treatment <strong>of</strong> fissure!
Treatment ▬ Principles Self-perpetuating cycleForcefuldilatationSplit <strong>of</strong>anodermFail to relaxwhen BOIschemia <strong>and</strong>healing failureInt. sphincter spasm(85% resting tone)Sympathetic(excitatory)Parasym(inhibitory)Key : Good bowel habit <strong>and</strong> relieve int. sphincter spasm
<strong>Management</strong> : Acute Fissure Regulate bowel habit Stool s<strong>of</strong>tener Bulk forming agent Pain relief (local + oral) + GTN ointment Healing rate = 85% (1st episode)
<strong>Management</strong> : Chronic Fissure Conservative measures alone usuallynot successful Chemical sphincterotomy Reduce anoderm ischemia, promotehealing <strong>and</strong> break the viscious cycle
<strong>Management</strong> : Chronic Fissure Glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) ointment (0.2%) 1st line agent currently Dosage‣ Twice daily x 6 weeks Healing rate‣ 60-70% Recurrence rate‣ 30% Side-effect‣ Headache (40-50%) <strong>and</strong> therefore poorcompliance
<strong>Management</strong> : Chronic Fissure Botulinum toxic (botox) injection More effective than GTN ointment <strong>and</strong> withoutmajor complication (level 2 evidence)Dosage‣ 15-20 units (0.15-0.2 c.c.) properly diluted <strong>and</strong>injected at 2-3 sites (at int. sphincter on eithersides <strong>of</strong> fissure) in divided dosesHealing rate‣ 80-90% at 8 weeksRecurrence rate‣ 10%Limitations‣ Expensive; development <strong>of</strong> antibodies; ? atrophy <strong>of</strong>EASSecond line agent Other agents Ditialzam (Ca + blockers), nifedipine ointment
Surgery for Persistent or RecurrentFissure After Medical TherapyAnal stretch Obsolete because unacceptablyrisk (level 1 evidence)high incontinenceGold st<strong>and</strong>ard Left lateral subcutaneous internal sphincterotomyPreop work-up ▬ manometry (baseline)Technical points Crushing technique Divide up to length <strong>of</strong> fissure or dentate line Excisionskintag<strong>of</strong> associated hypertrophiod papilla <strong>and</strong>No sutureCaution‣ Women have shorter anal canal Superior to botox in terms <strong>of</strong> healing rate (95%)<strong>and</strong> recurrence rate (< 5%) (level one evidence) Limitation Flatus incontinence (5%) Faecal incontinence (
<strong>Management</strong> <strong>of</strong> Anal Fissure Acute fissure Education, regulation <strong>of</strong> bowel habit,analgesia, topical medical therapy (85%) Chronic fissure Medical therapy first <strong>and</strong> review in 6-8weeks (TNG ointment or botox) Recurrent or refractory cases‣ Surgical sphincterotomy (5% flatusincontinence)
Recurrent Fissure After SurgeryRecurrent FissureIncompleteSphincterotomy(High Pressure)Endoanal USG + Manometry(± Biopsy / AFB smear)Complete Sphincterotomy(Low Pressure Fissure)EUAAnoplastyIntersphincteric AbscessDorsal InternalSphincterotomyNegative FindingsSphincterotomy onContralateral Side, orFissureotomy + Anoplasty(Flap Procedures)
Anal Fistula
Anal Fistula Definition Abnormal communication between theanorectum <strong>and</strong> perianal skin Etiology Cryptogl<strong>and</strong>ular (infected anal gl<strong>and</strong>s) Inflammation or infection(e.g. TB, Crohn’s disease) Trauma, foreign body, iatrogenic Malignancy
Classifications Park’s Classification (1976) Intersphincteric Transphincteric Suprasphincteric extrasphinctericN.B. : High fistula = int. opening above dentate line
Goodsall’s Rule Predictive accuracy <strong>of</strong> Goodsall’s rule Anterior‣ Accuracy 49% Posterior‣ Accuracy 90%‣ Usually one common track
Assessment in Clinic Simple or complicated fistulae Distance <strong>of</strong> ext. opening from anal verge 2 o pathology do a rectoscopicexamination
Principles <strong>of</strong> Surgery Drain all collections Identify <strong>and</strong> deal with all tracks Division <strong>of</strong> minimal amount <strong>of</strong> muscles Create a tear-drop wound (3-D) t<strong>of</strong>acilitate dressing <strong>and</strong> healing
Keys to Successful Surgery Assess the patient first; what is thecontinence function? Then drain collection <strong>and</strong> lay open 2 oextensions first Deal with primary track(s) last
Simple Fistula Clinical examination (overall accuracy70-84%) Usually does not need any investigation Examination under anaesthesia Fistulotomy = Lay Open
Complicated Fistulae Fistula with multiple tracks High fistulae Recurrent fistulae Fistulae due to secondary causes TB, Crohn’s, radiation Recto-vaginal or ano-vaginal fistulae
Complicated Fistulae Clinical assessment History‣ e.g. Recurrence, IBD, TB Digital examination‣ Feel the track, primary <strong>and</strong> secondary‣ Multiple external openings, anal fissures‣ Anal tone Rigid sigmoidoscopy
Investigations Define the anatomy Assess sphincter function Identify secondary causes
Investigations EUA Colonoscopy <strong>Anorectal</strong> manometry Fistulogram Falling out <strong>of</strong> favour because‣ No external opening‣ Accuracy 50%‣ Painful Endoanal USG MRI
Endoanal USG 7MHz – 10MHz rotating probe Accuracy 85-90% Fistula track-hypoechoeic H 2 O 2 to improve resolution PitfallsLimited focal range (not accuratefor extrasphincteric fistula)Sepsis <strong>and</strong> scar may mimic fistula
MRI Accuracy primary track 86% secondary track 86% horse-shoe extension 97% Endo-coil increase sensitivity ‘Gold-st<strong>and</strong>ard’ in UK
Principles Eradicate fistula pathology Preserve sphincter function Consider defunctioning colostomy Multiplicity <strong>of</strong> technique reflects theirrelative poor success rateN.B.: Sigmoid colostomy is preferred totransverse colostomy for defunctioning
IncontinenceHealingSurgicalFistulotomy(staged)50% 90%Cutting Seton 30% 70%Fistulectomy(core-out) +AdvancementFlap10% 50-60%Fibrin Glue 0%
Seton Drain pus (draining seton) Mark the track For subsequent surgical fistulotomy Cutting seton gradual severance <strong>of</strong> sphincter followedby fibrosis EUA in 2-4 weeks time Incontinence 10-30% Recurrence rate 4-20%
Crohn’s Anal Fistula Objective Eradication <strong>of</strong> sepsis (prevents flare-up) Draining seton Refractory case: proctectomy
Thank You!