12.07.2015 Views

the travaux préparatoires hague rules hague-visby rules - Comite ...

the travaux préparatoires hague rules hague-visby rules - Comite ...

the travaux préparatoires hague rules hague-visby rules - Comite ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PART II - HAGUE RULES 145Article 3 (1)(a) - SeaworthinessARTICLE 31. Le transporteur sera tenu avantet au début du voyage d’exercer unediligence raisonnable pour:a) Mettre le navire en état de navigabilité.ARTICLE 31. The carrier shall be bound beforeand at <strong>the</strong> beginning of <strong>the</strong> voyageto exercise due diligence to:a) Make <strong>the</strong> ship seaworthy.ILA 1921 Hague ConferenceText submitted to <strong>the</strong> Conference[xlvii]Article 3 - Responsibilities and Liabilities.1. The carrier shall be bound before and at <strong>the</strong> beginning of <strong>the</strong> voyage to exercise duediligence to-(a) Make <strong>the</strong> ship seaworthy.Second day’s proceedings - 31 August 1921[81]The Chairman: It is <strong>the</strong> will of <strong>the</strong> Committee that Article 3(1) stand part of <strong>the</strong>draft?Mr. Algot Bagge: May I ask a question in regard to <strong>the</strong> relation existing between 1and 2? In 1, it is provided that <strong>the</strong> carrier is bound to make <strong>the</strong> ship seaworthy. In <strong>the</strong>Canadian Act, it is stated “to make and keep <strong>the</strong> ship seaworthy”. Now, I suppose<strong>the</strong>re are two ways of taking care of <strong>the</strong> goods: <strong>the</strong> one is <strong>the</strong> direct way, and <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>ris <strong>the</strong> indirect way. The indirect way is to make and keep <strong>the</strong> ship in seaworthy condition,so that <strong>the</strong> goods are not damaged whilst <strong>the</strong>y are carried. The direct way is, Isuppose, to take due care of <strong>the</strong> goods whilst handling, loading and stowing <strong>the</strong>m. Ishould like to know whe<strong>the</strong>r No. 2 does cover <strong>the</strong> indirect way of taking care of <strong>the</strong>goods, or whe<strong>the</strong>r it merely refers to <strong>the</strong> direct way, when handling <strong>the</strong> goods? If itdoes not, I suppose it would be better to put in <strong>the</strong> words “keep <strong>the</strong> ship seaworthy”;o<strong>the</strong>rwise, in <strong>the</strong> event of <strong>the</strong> voyage having begun, if <strong>the</strong> shipowner does not keep <strong>the</strong>ship seaworthy, it would not be covered by 1 or 2.[82]The Chairman: I should like to hear what Sir Norman Hill has to say, because myimpression is that <strong>the</strong> intention here is that <strong>the</strong> shipowner shall be obliged to have <strong>the</strong>ship during <strong>the</strong> voyage in a seaworthy state; that is, not only to send it forth in a seaworthystate, but to maintain it during <strong>the</strong> voyage, and that <strong>the</strong> word was used withthat intent, but Sir Norman Hill will tell <strong>the</strong> Committee.Sir Norman Hill: Mr. Chairman. The words in <strong>the</strong> Canadian Act are “to make andkeep”. Those are not <strong>the</strong> words in <strong>the</strong> Harter Act. As I understood it, and I think thatis as <strong>the</strong> cargo interests generally understood it, <strong>the</strong> obligation in regard to seaworthinessis up to <strong>the</strong> time of starting on <strong>the</strong> voyage. To begin with, before you start loadingyour cargo you must have a seaworthy ship, a ship worthy to take that cargo, andwhen she leaves on <strong>the</strong> voyage she must still be seaworthy. If you go fur<strong>the</strong>r than that,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!