12.07.2015 Views

the travaux préparatoires hague rules hague-visby rules - Comite ...

the travaux préparatoires hague rules hague-visby rules - Comite ...

the travaux préparatoires hague rules hague-visby rules - Comite ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PART II - HAGUE RULES 371Article 4 (2) - The catalogue of exceptionsfection de marques;p) de vices cachés échappant àune diligence raisonnable;q) de toute autre cause ne provenantpas du fait ou de la faute dutransporteur ou du fait ou de la fautedes agents ou préposés du transporteur,mais le fardeau de la preuveincombera à la personne réclamantle bénéfice de cette exceptionet il lui appartiendra de montrerque ni la faute personnelle ni le faitdu transporteur ni la faute ou le faitdes agents ou préposés du transporteurn’ont contribué à la perteou au dommage.proof shall be on <strong>the</strong> person claiming<strong>the</strong> benefit of this exception toshow that nei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> actual fault orprivity of <strong>the</strong> carrier nor <strong>the</strong> fault orneglect of <strong>the</strong> agents or servants of<strong>the</strong> carrier contributed to <strong>the</strong> lossor damage.1. The Catalogue of ExceptionsILA 1921 Hague ConferenceSecond day’s proceedings - 31 August 1921[143]Mr. Leopold Dor: The alteration I want to make is not specially on (a), but on all<strong>the</strong> amendments proposed by <strong>the</strong> shipowners for all that clause No. 2. I think it wouldbe very unwise to make our <strong>rules</strong> look like a bill of lading. Especially as far as <strong>the</strong> Conferenceis concerned, if we go to <strong>the</strong> Chambers of Commerce (and I speak especiallyin view of <strong>the</strong> French Chambers of Commerce) and we say to <strong>the</strong>m “All <strong>the</strong> interestsconcerned have met at <strong>the</strong> Conference of <strong>the</strong> Hague and have discussed this questionand agreed upon those <strong>rules</strong>”; <strong>the</strong>y will look at those <strong>rules</strong> and <strong>the</strong> first thing that willstrike <strong>the</strong>m is that <strong>the</strong>y are much too long. You have in England a way of defining <strong>rules</strong>and legislation which is very different from ours. We try to make things as short as wecan, and I fancy that you try to make <strong>the</strong>m as long as you can (Laughter); but you certainlymake <strong>the</strong>m much longer than we do. The Marine Insurance Act, on that smallpoint, is longer than our whole Civil Code, which covers <strong>the</strong> whole of French civil law.You like long enumerations. We like very short sentences in which <strong>the</strong>re is embodieda principle which covers everything. You are always afraid of forgetting one thing or<strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r. We say <strong>the</strong> right way not to forget is not to enumerate. If you start making along enumeration <strong>the</strong>n you are sure to forget something. It seems to me that that iswhat we are doing in that long enumeration. Besides, not only <strong>the</strong> French cargo owners,but <strong>the</strong> French Chambers of Commerce, will say: “Oh, well, those shrewd Englishshipowners have managed to convince <strong>the</strong> International Law Association to put oneof <strong>the</strong>ir bills of lading into <strong>the</strong> Hague Rules 1921, and <strong>the</strong>y will now say no longer billsof lading, but ‘Here are <strong>the</strong> Hague Rules, 1921’”. You want to avoid that. That Article,before <strong>the</strong> amendments or without <strong>the</strong> amendments, is already quite long enough.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!