<strong>Indigenous</strong> <strong>Peoples</strong>, <strong>Poverty</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Self</strong>-<strong>Determ<strong>in</strong>ation</strong>Maaka, R., <strong>and</strong> A. Fleras. 2000. ‘Engag<strong>in</strong>g with Indigeneity:T<strong>in</strong>o rangatiratanga <strong>in</strong> Aotearoa,’ <strong>in</strong> D. Ivison, P. Patton <strong>and</strong> W.S<strong>and</strong>ers, eds., Political Theory <strong>and</strong> the Rights of <strong>Indigenous</strong> <strong>Peoples</strong>.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 89-109.McNeil, K. 1998. Def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Aborig<strong>in</strong>al Title <strong>in</strong> the 90’s: Has theSupreme Court F<strong>in</strong>ally Got it Right? Toronto: Robarts Centre forCanadian Studies, York University.Mart<strong>in</strong>, D.F. 2001. ‘Is welfare dependency “welfare poison’”? Anassessment of Noel Pearson’s proposals for Aborig<strong>in</strong>al welfarereform.’ Discussion Paper no. 213/2001. Centre for Aborig<strong>in</strong>alEconomic Policy Research, <strong>Australia</strong>n National University.Mohawk Council of Akwesasne. 2002. Nation Build<strong>in</strong>g Process:Sett<strong>in</strong>g Our Path for the Future. Cornwall, Ontario: MohawkCouncil of Akwesasne.Moore, M.A., H. Forbes, <strong>and</strong> L. Henderson. 1990. ‘Theprovision of primary health care services under b<strong>and</strong> control:The Montreal Lake case.’ Native Studies Review 6(1): 153-64.Moran, A. 2002. ‘As <strong>Australia</strong> decolonizes: <strong>in</strong>digeniz<strong>in</strong>g settlernationalism <strong>and</strong> the challenges of settler/<strong>Indigenous</strong> relations.’Ethnic <strong>and</strong> Racial Studies 25(2): 1013-1042.Morse, B.W. 1998. ‘Two steps forward <strong>and</strong> one step back:The frustrat<strong>in</strong>g pace of build<strong>in</strong>g a new Aborig<strong>in</strong>al-Crownrelationship <strong>in</strong> Canada,’ <strong>in</strong> C.P. Cohen, ed., The Human Rights of<strong>Indigenous</strong> <strong>Peoples</strong>. Ardsley, New York: Transnational Publishers.pp. 303-56.Nagel, J. 1996. American Indian Ethnic Renewal: Red Power<strong>and</strong> the Resurgence of Identity <strong>and</strong> Culture. New York: OxfordUniversity Press.36
CornellNative Nations Institute for Leadership, Management, <strong>and</strong>Policy. 2001. ‘Ktunaxa/K<strong>in</strong>basket Tribal Council: F<strong>in</strong>al reporton governmental organization <strong>and</strong> nation build<strong>in</strong>g.’ Udall Centerfor Studies <strong>in</strong> Public Policy, The University of Arizona, Tucson.Nettheim, G., G.D. Meyers, <strong>and</strong> D. Craig. 2002. <strong>Indigenous</strong><strong>Peoples</strong> <strong>and</strong> Governance Structures: A Comparative Analysis ofL<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Resource Management Rights. Canberra: Aborig<strong>in</strong>alStudies Press, <strong>Australia</strong>n Institute of Aborig<strong>in</strong>al <strong>and</strong> TorresStrait Isl<strong>and</strong>er Studies.North, D.C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change <strong>and</strong> EconomicPerformance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Oberschall, A. 1990. ‘Incentives, governance, <strong>and</strong> development <strong>in</strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ese collective agriculture,’ <strong>in</strong> M. Hechter, K.D. Opp, <strong>and</strong> R.Wippler, eds., Social Institutions: Their Emergence, Ma<strong>in</strong>tenance<strong>and</strong> Effects. New York: Ald<strong>in</strong>e de Gruyter. pp. 265-89.Ostrom, E. 1992. Craft<strong>in</strong>g Institutions for <strong>Self</strong>-Govern<strong>in</strong>g IrrigationSystems. San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies.Perry, R.J. 1996. From Time Immemorial: <strong>Indigenous</strong> <strong>Peoples</strong> <strong>and</strong>State Systems. Aust<strong>in</strong>: University of Texas Press.Pocock, J.G.A. 2000. ‘Waitangi as mystery of state:Consequences of the ascription of federative capacity to theMaori,’ <strong>in</strong> D. Ivison, P. Patton <strong>and</strong> W. S<strong>and</strong>ers, eds., PoliticalTheory <strong>and</strong> the Rights of <strong>Indigenous</strong> <strong>Peoples</strong>. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press. pp. 25-35.Price, R.T. 2001. ‘New Zeal<strong>and</strong>’s <strong>in</strong>terim treaty settlements <strong>and</strong>arrangements—build<strong>in</strong>g blocks of certa<strong>in</strong>ty,’ <strong>in</strong> British ColumbiaTreaty Commission, Speak<strong>in</strong>g Truth to Power: A Treaty Forum.Law Commission of Canada. pp. 135-63.37
- Page 1 and 2: Joint Occasional Papers on on Nativ
- Page 3 and 4: CornellIndigenous Peoples, Poverty
- Page 5 and 6: CornellIndigenous Peoples, Poverty
- Page 7 and 8: CornellIndigenous Peoples, Poverty
- Page 9 and 10: CornellObviously the differences ar
- Page 11 and 12: CornellCommonalitiesAlthough there
- Page 13 and 14: CornellThe present inquiry, while p
- Page 15 and 16: CornellCentral governments, on the
- Page 17 and 18: Cornellstark discrepancy between In
- Page 19 and 20: Cornellusual economic factors such
- Page 21 and 22: CornellThe meaning and role of self
- Page 23 and 24: Cornellis needed. Those nations mak
- Page 25 and 26: CornellThe U.S. government had inad
- Page 27 and 28: CornellSuch variation does not nega
- Page 29 and 30: CornellBern and Dodds discuss the s
- Page 31 and 32: Cornellgroup identities and boundar
- Page 33 and 34: CornellThe overall policy implicati
- Page 35 and 36: CornellReferencesAnaya, S.J. 1996.
- Page 37 and 38: Cornell-----. 1995. ‘Where does e
- Page 39 and 40: CornellHarvard Project on American
- Page 41: CornellJorgensen, M., and J. Taylor
- Page 45 and 46: CornellWakeling, S., M. Jorgensen,
- Page 47 and 48: Joint Occasional Papers on Native A