Power Optimization and Prediction Techniques for FPGAs - Jason H ...
Power Optimization and Prediction Techniques for FPGAs - Jason H ...
Power Optimization and Prediction Techniques for FPGAs - Jason H ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
List of Tables2.1 Summary of commercial FPGA routing architectures (lengths given in CLB tilesor LAB tiles, as appropriate). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 243.1 Major circuit blocks in target FPGA. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 523.2 Characteristics of benchmark circuits. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 543.3 Detailed active leakage power results. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 603.4 Effect of leakage-aware routing on critical path delay. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 663.5 Detailed active leakage power results <strong>for</strong> leakage-aware routing combined withpolarity selection. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 684.1 85 ◦ C leakage power reduction results <strong>for</strong> basic design (unshaded) <strong>and</strong> alternatedesign (shaded). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 894.2 25 ◦ C leakage power reduction results <strong>for</strong> basic design (unshaded) <strong>and</strong> alternatedesign (shaded). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 904.3 85 ◦ C leakage power reduction results <strong>for</strong> basic+MUX design (unshaded) <strong>and</strong>alternate+MUX design (shaded). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 914.4 25 ◦ C leakage power reduction results <strong>for</strong> basic+MUX design (unshaded) <strong>and</strong>alternate+MUX design (shaded). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 914.5 Sleep mode leakage results 85 ◦ C (unshaded) <strong>and</strong> 25 ◦ C (shaded). . . . . . . . . . 924.6 Dynamic power results <strong>for</strong> all switch designs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 935.1 Detailed results <strong>for</strong> depth-optimal 4-LUT mapping solutions. . . . . . . . . . . . 1156.1 Characteristics of benchmark circuits. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1256.2 Effect of glitching on switching activity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1276.3 Error in predicted activity values. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1356.4 Error in predicted activity values <strong>for</strong> alternate benchmark division. . . . . . . . . 1396.5 Noise in individual circuits. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142xv