3 years ago

Adolescent Focus Groups Report - Consumer Quality Initiatives

Adolescent Focus Groups Report - Consumer Quality Initiatives


FOCUS GROUP PARTICIPANTSCQI conducted two focus groups with adolescents: one at the Children’s CommunitySupport Collaborative in Brighton on April 5, 2006, and the other at American Training,Inc. in Lawrence on April 12, 2006. There were a total of 23 participants, includingpeople of white/Caucasian, African-American, and Latino/Hispanic heritage. Most youthin the focus groups had been in hospitals, residential facilities and group homes. Mostwere currently living in a group home.THEMESOveremphasis on RulesMost participants recognized the need for residential/hospital rules, but many felt that therules were overdone, and were applied indiscriminately and without regard to the needsof the individual 1 . For example, many youth found restrictions placed on phone calls andphone contacts to be detrimental to maintaining good outside relationships. Many youthfound some rules to be unrealistic and unhelpful for their growth. They thus sometimeswanted to break rules not related to safety because they infringed on their sense ofindependence. Programs need to find ways to support adolescents’ growing need forautonomy in decision-making and independence.How Programs Have HelpedThe youth noted a wide range of ways that the care received from hospitals, residentialprograms and outpatient programs had helped. Many youth stated that being at a programgot them away from bad situations or environments, particularly involving their families,schools and neighborhoods. Several said that being in a program prevented them fromcommitting self harm/suicide or ending up on the streets.Many youth mentioned the support and kindness of a community, especially the staff andother young adults, as one of the best aspects of their programs. Several gained a greaterunderstanding of themselves, their problems and how to deal with them. They said thatthe program helped them through their struggles. Many youth believed their programallowed them to interact with others. As one youth said, “It made me realize I’m notalone, that there are people like me who are going through similar things.”Positive Relationships with StaffMany youth cited their relationships with staff as important to their growth andsatisfaction with a program. These youth preferred staff that listen, are supportive of theirneeds, are respectful, and give advice. As one satisfied youth said, “Staff isnonjudgmental, understands you, accepts you the way you are; they don’t judge you.”Many people mentioned that their DMH case manager was supportive when they were inthe hospital, including visiting them in the hospital. Youth also said they appreciated timespent with their advocate. It was important for individual attention, going out into the1 Particularly those who believed that they were not causing trouble.

community, getting fresh air and bonding. Because this time was so valued, some peoplewished that they were allowed to switch advocates if they were unhappy.Some youth felt that staff competence varied from program to program. One said that atthe hospital, “The staff treated you normally, but here [at the group home] they thinkyou’re bad kids.”FriendshipsFor many youth, developing and maintaining positive friendships is extremely importantbecause they face isolation and ostracism from peers in the community. Programs needto find ways to encourage and support positive friendships, so that youth have a sense ofnormalcy and personal support.Rather than banning certain friendships, program staff could help youth weigh thepositives and negatives of their friendships wherever they developed, in the communityor in programs.1) Friendships in the communityMany youth experienced difficulty developing and maintaining friendships in thecommunity as a result of entering a residential program. Some youth stated that enteringa program resulted in their outside friendships dropping off, often because of stigma andfear. For many other youth, participation in their program restricted their ability todevelop and maintain outside friendships.These youth want to get more than brief, restricted visitations with their friends, andbetter opportunities to “hang out.” They found the restrictive phone policies troubling, inthat they were not often given the freedom to talk to friends.2) Friendships in the ProgramsOne rule that troubled a large number of youth was the rule that they are not supposed tomake friends with other youth in programs. They found it unrealistic and unhelpful.Often making friends in a program is the only opportunity youth have to developfriendship with peers. One youth said, “If I went home now I wouldn’t have any friends; Ihave friends in the program.” Several people mentioned the support of others in program:“The kids understand each other.”Youth said that making friends in programs gave them confidence and the skills to makebetter choices with friendships. Rather than discourage friendships, programs should findways of supporting the positive, encouraging friendship youth make in programs andrecognize that peers are an important source of support for youth.3) Friendships during a TransitionMore attention needs to be paid to helping youth maintain and normalize friendships andrelationships when they are making a transition, either from home to a program, whenswitching programs, or when returning home. Some people expressed unhappiness withthe process for leaving programs. “When changing programs, it happens too fast – it’s

Eligibility/Access Focus Group Report - Consumer Quality Initiatives
QUALITY: SHIFTING THE FOCUS A Report from ... - se
Water Quality - Consumer Confidence Report ... - City of Kennewick
Smart Smiles Initiative - Focus Group Findings, Spring 2012
AWCI Water Quality Group Reporting
Transgender Focus Group Report - Virginia Department of Health
Focus group Report - EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre
Transgender Focus Group Report - Virginia Department of Health
Focus Group Report - Mezzanine - Becker's ASC Review
Focus group Report - EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre
Annual Consumer Con dence Report on Drinking Water Quality
National Focus Group Report - The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation
Focus Groups 4-6 Report – Industry, Forest Products Association
Focus Group Evaluation of Tributary Report Cards Chesapeake Bay ...
Consumer in-depth interview - Focus-Balkans
Consumer Electronics Industry Approaches and Initiatives for ...
Report of Focus Group Meetings - Page County Public Schools
Report, Focus group meeting Annai, North Rupununi Region Nine
National Initiative on Adolescent Catechesis - Amazing Catechists
On the margins Keeping the plates spinning - Consumer Focus
Consumer Focus magazine – Issue 1 - Nigel Wright
Quality Initiative Update - Mission Health