The importance of actuarial accounting for the assessment of the elements of the financial statementsThe following situations can occur: when part of the book value of an asset owned by the corporation can be allocated on areasonable and consistent basis to the respective unit :- the economic entity must compare the book value of the unit, inclu<strong>din</strong>g that part of the bookvalue of the asset owned by the corporation to the unit, to its recoverable value. ;- any impairment loss must be recognized when the recoverable value is lower than the bookvalue; part of the book value of an asset owned by the corporation cannot be allocated on areasonable and consistent basis to that unit:- the company will compare the carrying amount of the unit, exclu<strong>din</strong>g the corporate asset,with its recoverable amount and recognize any impairment loss in compliance with therequirements un<strong>de</strong>r IAS 36;- it will i<strong>de</strong>ntify the smallest group of cash-generating units care inclu<strong>de</strong> the cash-generatingunit un<strong>de</strong>r review and to which a portion of the carrying amount of the corporate asset canbe allocated on a reasonable and consistent basis;- compare the carrying amount of that group of cash-generating units, inclu<strong>din</strong>g the portion ofthe carrying amount of the corporate asset allocated to that group of units, with therecoverable amount of that group of units;- any impairment loss is to be recognized in compliance with the requirements of IAS 36.In or<strong>de</strong>r to assess the goodwill associated to the transferred activity if the asset wasallocated to a cash-generating unit and the company ce<strong>de</strong>s an activity within the respective unit,we take into consi<strong>de</strong>ration the following explanation:A company sells an activity constituting part of a cash-generating unit to which thegoodwill was allocated, for 150 m.u. The goodwill allocated to that unit can be i<strong>de</strong>ntified orassociated to a group of assets at a lower lever than the one of that unit, only arbitrarily. Therecoverable value of the part retained from the cash-generating unit is 450 m.u.The conclusions are that:- the goodwill associated to the ce<strong>de</strong>d activity must be inclu<strong>de</strong>d in the book value of theactivity when the income or the loss <strong>de</strong>rived from that transfer are assessed;- the value of the goodwill associated to the ce<strong>de</strong>d activity is assessed by taking into accountthat this goodwill cannot be only be arbitrarily associated with a group of assets at a lowerlevel than that unit;- the goodwill associated to the ce<strong>de</strong>d activity is assessed based on the relative values of thece<strong>de</strong>d activity and of the part retained from the cash-generating unit ;- the obtained result is: 150 :(150+450)=25% of the goodwill allocated to the unit is inclu<strong>de</strong><strong>din</strong>to the carrying value of the ce<strong>de</strong>d activity.5. ConclusionsIn the past few years, on the background of certain financial scandals, the fair valuemo<strong>de</strong>l seems to be the most controversial one, as it is contested by a number of financialspecialists.Traditionally, the carrying value is the value entered in the moment of the transaction, i.e.the value entered on the date when an item or an account receivable is obtained, or when a <strong>de</strong>btis contracted. This is a verifiable value that is related to the asset and liability acquirement,which is the reason why, in accounting, the principle of the assessment based on the historiccost was established.66
The importance of actuarial accounting for the assessment of the elements of the financial statementsThe assessment based on the historic cost is irrelevant when there is inflation, because itgenerates a distorted appearance of the reality: the assets are un<strong>de</strong>restimated; moreover, theperformance of the company is not evaluated correctly, because the income is un<strong>de</strong>restimated,and the company pays inflation tax and distributes fictitious divi<strong>de</strong>nds.For the companies in “the new economy” that invest a sign<strong>ific</strong>ant part of their resourcesin intangible assets, the traditional accounting mo<strong>de</strong>l based on historic costs no longer reflectsthe reality.If there is no market price for the element that must be evaluated at its fair value, asubstitute should be found for the market value; unlike the market value, a piece of informationthat is found, its substitute is a value assessed function of our own professional judgement. Inthis circumstance, the world of accountants and financial analysts is divi<strong>de</strong>d between those whoare pro, and those who are against the assessment at the fair value.At the European level, the assessment at the fair value represents a rather controversialtopic. For some, the fair value is a means of ren<strong>de</strong>ring objective accounting information. Forothers, the fair value just a method of assessing value that can lead to creating accountingbehaviour.The most fervent opponents to the assessment at the fair value are the insurance andbanking specialists. Their worst fears are related to the adjustments generated by diminishingvalues, of the assets as compared to the market value, given the fact that their solvency andcontinuity are crucial for their <strong>de</strong>positors and insurance hol<strong>de</strong>rs. World Bank auditors, influentialbankers, members of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision consi<strong>de</strong>r that the fair valueevaluation is not a<strong>de</strong>quate to the banking accounting of insurance companies. The followingquestion arises: “what will be the sign<strong>ific</strong>ance attributed by the bank auditors to their capitalbasis evaluated at the fair value as compared to the own regulated funds?” 21 The capital base ofbanks has a broa<strong>de</strong>r meaning than the regular capital base, since it also inclu<strong>de</strong>s the reservesdrawn for expenses, such as reserves for credit risks. In this case, the market may mistake theincrease in the fair value of the capital base for an increase in risks, thus anticipating a crisis. Onthe other hand, bank auditors may misinterpret a <strong>de</strong>crease in the fair value of the capital base andtake corrective steps that may disturb the market.Fair value accounting cannot be adjusted to a vast number of capital transactions,especially to the European ones, for which the main priority, in what credits are concerned, isconstituted by fixed-interest rate loans. 22 The fair value evaluation in insurances is still far fromoffering the necessary guarantees in what the reliability and applicability on various markets areconcerned, if we take into consi<strong>de</strong>ration that there is the risk that it may induce extreme volatilityin the obtained results, which is a situation that might cause panic among insurance hol<strong>de</strong>rs. 23Some specialists claim that the evaluation of the balance using the fair value is a<strong>de</strong>quateonly for the items that are to be sold, while the others, that are to be retained should be evaluatedat their historic cost. 24It is difficult to give a <strong>de</strong>finite answer to the question whether the balance at the historic will bereplaced by the balance at the market price.21 V Oung , Cosidérations pru<strong>de</strong>ntielles sur la comptabilisation en »juste valeur » pour les établissements <strong>de</strong> crédit,« Bulletin <strong>de</strong> la Banque <strong>de</strong> France », no. 95/November 200122 O. Pastré, M Vigier, Le capitalisme déboussolé. Après Enron et Vivendi : soixante réformes pour un nouveaugouvernement d` entreprise, Editions La Découverte, 200323 F. LUSTMAN, Normalisation comptable pour les assurances et les banques : vers <strong>de</strong>s normes ou <strong>de</strong>s dogmes ?,Revue française <strong>de</strong> comptabilité, no. 440/ January 200224 IAS 39 « Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement » recommends the fair value accounting for all thenegotiable assets and liabilities; the other elements are not negotiable (for example: the loan portfolio and bank<strong>de</strong>posits) are entered at their historic costs.67