30.11.2012 Views

E-Book of Articles - World Federation of Music Therapy

E-Book of Articles - World Federation of Music Therapy

E-Book of Articles - World Federation of Music Therapy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Bonde, Lars Ole: Analogy And Metapher In <strong>Music</strong> <strong>Therapy</strong> Theory ...<br />

(b) tension between two interpretations: between a literal interpretation<br />

that perishes at the hands <strong>of</strong> semantic impertinence and a metaphorical<br />

interpretation whoese sense emerges through non-sense;<br />

(c) tension in the relational function <strong>of</strong> the copula; between identity and<br />

difference in the interplay <strong>of</strong> resemblance. “ (Ricoeur 1977, p. 247){3}<br />

Ricouer’s understanding <strong>of</strong> the difference between symbol and<br />

metaphor leads him to the following statement, which has pr<strong>of</strong>ound<br />

meaning in a psychotherapeutic context:<br />

“It appears as though certain fundamental experiences make up an<br />

immediate symbolism that presides over the most primitive metaphorical<br />

order...symbolic experience calls for a work <strong>of</strong> meaning from metaphor, a<br />

work which it partially provides through its organizational network and its<br />

hierarchical levels. Everything indicates that symbol systems constitute a<br />

reservoir <strong>of</strong> meaning whose metaphoric potential is yet to be spoken. And,<br />

in fact, the history <strong>of</strong> words and culture would seem to indicate that... this<br />

deep layer only becomes accessible to us to the extent that it is formed and<br />

articulated at a linguistic and literary level since the most insistent<br />

metaphors hold fast to the intertwining <strong>of</strong> the symbolic infrastructure and<br />

metaphoric superstructure.” (Ricoeur: Interpretation Theory..., quoted<br />

from McGaughey 1992, p. 425).<br />

McGaughey suggests in his attempt to distinguish metaphor and symbol, that<br />

one must speak about ‘the narrative symbol’ as <strong>of</strong> ‘the semantic metaphor’<br />

(p.427). This leads us to Ricoeur’s understanding <strong>of</strong> Mimesis, the key<br />

concept <strong>of</strong> the narrative - be it <strong>of</strong> a novel, a life story - or a therapeutic<br />

journey. His concept <strong>of</strong> mimesis is threefold:<br />

Mimesis1 is the originary pre-understanding <strong>of</strong> action/praxis (prefigured<br />

temporal aspects)<br />

Mimesis2 is a midpoint <strong>of</strong> mimetic action or ‘structuration’: the narrative<br />

(mediator: the time <strong>of</strong> emplotment; configuration <strong>of</strong> temporal aspects)<br />

Mimesis3 is a subsequent action/praxis <strong>of</strong> application in understanding [by<br />

the reader] (refiguration <strong>of</strong> temporal experience)<br />

39

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!