BIELAK, A., HOLMES, J., SAVGÅRD, J. & SCHAEFER, K. 2009. A comparison of European andNorth American approaches <strong>to</strong> the management and communication of environmentalresearch, Report 5958. S<strong>to</strong>ckholm: Swedish <strong>Environmental</strong> Protection Agency.BIERMANN, F. 2007. 'Earth system governance' as a crosscutting theme of global change research.<strong>Global</strong> <strong>Environmental</strong> Change, 17, 326-337.BIGGS, R., BOHENSKY, E., DESANKER, P., FABRICIUS, C., LYNAM, T., MISSELHORN, A.,MUSVOTO, C., MUTALE, M., REYERS, B., SCHOLES, R. J., SHIKONGO, S. & VANJAARSVELD, A. S. 2004. Nature Supporting People: The Southern African MillenniumEcosystem Assessment Integrated Report. Pre<strong>to</strong>ria: Council for Scientific and IndustrialResearch.BIGGS, R., RAUDSEPP-HEARNE, C., ATKINSON-PALOMBO, C., BOHENSKY, E., BOYD, E.,CUNDILL, G., FOX, H., INGRAM, S., KOK, K., SPEHAR, S., TENGÖ, M., TIMMER, D.& ZUREK, M. 2007. Linking futures across scales: a dialog on multiscale scenarios. Ecologyand Society, 12.BLUM, A. 2009. Effective use of water (EUW) and not water-use efficiency (WUE) is the target ofcrop yield improvement under drought stress. Field Crops Research, 112, 119-123.BOHLE, H. G. 2001. Vulnerability and Criticality: Perspectives from Social Geography. IHDPUpdate. IHDP.BOHLE, H. G., DOWNING, T. E. & WATTS, M. J. 1994. Climate change and social vulnerability:<strong>to</strong>ward a sociology and geography of food insecurity. <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Environmental</strong> Change, 4, 37-48.BOUMAN, B. A. M., VAN KEULEN, H., VAN LAAR, H. H. & RABBINGE, R. 1996. The `Schoolof de Wit' crop growth simulation models: A pedigree and his<strong>to</strong>rical overview. AgriculturalSystems, 52, 171-198.BRKLACICH, M., BROWN, I. F., CAMPOS, E. J. D., KRUSCHE, A., A., L., KAM-BIU, L.,JIMÉNEZ-OSORNIO, J. J., REYNES-KNOCHE, S. & WOOD, C. 2007. Stakeholders and<strong>Global</strong> <strong>Environmental</strong> Change Science. In: TIESSEN, H., BRKLACICH, M.,BREULMANN, G. & MENEZES, R. S. C. (eds.) Communicating <strong>Global</strong> Change Science <strong>to</strong>Society: An Assessment and Case Studies. Washing<strong>to</strong>n, DC: Island Press.BROWN, M. E. 2008. Famine Early Warning Systems and Remote Sensing Data, Berlin/Heidelberg,Springer-Verlag.BROWN, M. E. & FUNK, C. C. 2008. <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Security</strong> Under Climate Change. Science, 319, 580-581.BRUINSMA, J. (ed.) 2003. World Agriculture: <strong>to</strong>wards 2015/2030 An FAO perspective, London:Earthscan.CASH, D. W., ADGER, W. N., BERKES, F., GARDEN, P., LEBEL, L., OLSSON, P.,PRITCHARD, L. & YOUNG, O. 2006. Scale and Cross-scale Dynamics: Governance andInformation in a Multilevel World. Ecology and Society, 11, 8.CCAFS 2009. Report 1: Climate Change, Agriculture and <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Security</strong>. A CGIAR ChallengeProgram. Rome and Paris: The Alliance of the CGIAR Centers and ESSP.CCAFS SCENARIOS TEAM 2010. Report on CCAFS Regional Scenarios Development for EastAfrica. Copenhagen: CCAFS.CHALLINOR, A., WHEELER, T., GARFORTH, C., CRAUFURD, P. & KASSAM, A. 2007.Assessing the vulnerability of food crop systems in Africa <strong>to</strong> climate change. ClimaticChange, 83, 381-399.CHALLINOR, A. J., EWERT, F., ARNOLD, S., SIMELTON, E. & FRASER, E. 2009. Crops andclimate change: progress, trends, and challenges in simulating impacts and informingadaptation. Journal of Experimental Botany, 60, 2775-2789.CHAMBERS, R., PACEY, A. & THRUPP, L. A. (eds.) 1989. Farmer first: farmer innovation andagricultural research, London: Intermediate Technology Publication.126
CHAN, S. C. 2010. <strong>Food</strong>, Memories and Identities in Hong Kong. Identities, 17, 204-227.CIBSE 2009. Energy Efficiency in Commercial Kitchens (CIBSE Technical Memoranda 50).Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers.CLARK, W., MITCHELL, R., CASH, D. & ALCOCK, F. 2002. Information as influence: howinstitutions mediate the impact of scientific assessments on global affairs. Faculty ResearchWorking Paper Series. John F Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.COE, R., HUWE, B. & SCHROTH, G. 2003. Designing experiments and analysing data. In:SCHROTH, G. A. S., F. L. (ed.) Trees, Crops and Soil Fertility - Concepts and ResearchMethods. Wallingford: CAB International.COURT, J. & YOUNG, J. 2006. Bridging research and policy in international development: ananalytical and practical framework. Development in Practice, 16, 85-90DALGAARD, T., HUTCHINGS, N. J. & PORTER, J. R. 2003. Agroecology, scaling andinterdisciplinarity. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 100, 39-51.DARNHOFER, I., BELLON, S., DEDIEU, B. & MILESTAD, R. 2010. Adaptiveness <strong>to</strong> enhance thesustainability of farming systems. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev., 30, 545-555.DAVIES, R. W. D., CRIPPS, S. J., NICKSON, A. & PORTER, G. 2009. Defining and estimatingglobal marine fisheries bycatch. Marine Policy, 33, 661-672.DE FRIES, R. S., FOLEY, J. A. & ASNER, G. P. 2004. Land-use choices: balancing human needsand ecosystem function. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2, 249-257.DE SCHUTTER, O. 2010. Report submitted by the Special Rapporteur on the right <strong>to</strong> food. UnitedNations General Assembly.DEFRA 2006. <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Security</strong> and the UK: An Evidence and Analysis Paper. <strong>Food</strong> Chain AnalysisGroup.DEFRA 2008. Ensuring the UK’s food security in a changing world, a Defra Discussion Paper.Department for Environment, <strong>Food</strong> and Rural Affairs.DEFRA 2009. UK <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Security</strong> Assessment: Our Approach. Department for Environment <strong>Food</strong> andRural Affairs.DIXIT, A. 2003. Floods and Vulnerability: Need <strong>to</strong> Rethink Flood Management. Natural Hazards,28, 155-179.DIXON, J., GULLIVER, A. & GIBBON, G. 2001. Farming Systems and Poverty: ImprovingFarmers’ Livelihoods in a Changing World, Rome and Washing<strong>to</strong>n D.C., FAO and WorldBank.DÖÖS, B. R. 2002. The problem of predicting global food production. Ambio, 31, 417-424.DRIMIE, S., J. ARNTZEN, P. DUBE, J.S.I. INGRAM, R.T. MANO, C. MATAYA, M.TMUCHERO, E. VHURUMUKU & G. ZIERVOGEL 2011. <strong>Global</strong> environmental change andfood systems in southern Africa: the dynamic challenges facing regional policy. Journal ofGeography and Regional Planning, 4, 169-182.DUCKHAM, A. N. & MASEFIELD, G. B. 1970. Farming systems of the world, London, Chat<strong>to</strong> &Windus Ltd.DUPONT, D. P. & RENZETTI, S. 1998. Water Use in the Canadian <strong>Food</strong> Processing Industry.Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 46, 1-10.DUXBURY, J. M., ABROL, I. P., GUPTA, R. K. & BRONSON, K. F. 2000. Analysis of long-termsoil fertility experiments with rice-wheat rotations in South Asia. In: ABROL, I. P.,BRONSON, K. F., DUXBURY, J. M. & GUPTA, R. K. (eds.) Long-term soil fertilityexperiments in rice-wheat cropping systems. New Delhi: Rice-Wheat Consortium for theIndo-Gangetic Plains.DYSON, T. 1996. Population and <strong>Food</strong>, London, Routledge.127
- Page 1 and 2:
From Food Production to Food Securi
- Page 3 and 4:
From Food Production to Food Securi
- Page 5 and 6:
Table of ContentsAbstract .........
- Page 7 and 8:
Paper 6: Undertaking Research at th
- Page 9:
AbstractFood security is a conditio
- Page 12 and 13:
2010 about 925 million people had t
- Page 14 and 15:
water) are used, and reduce negativ
- Page 16 and 17:
While the flow of the argument abou
- Page 18 and 19:
determine interactions along and be
- Page 20 and 21:
Paper 3: A Food Systems Approach to
- Page 23:
From Food Production to Food Securi
- Page 26 and 27:
concerns and are now issues that mu
- Page 28 and 29:
the relationships between GEC and f
- Page 30 and 31:
Theme 2 aims to understand how comm
- Page 32 and 33:
GEC and the Food System of the Indo
- Page 34 and 35:
Paper 2: The role of agronomic rese
- Page 36 and 37:
These advances have resulted from a
- Page 38 and 39:
Crop selection to determine mechani
- Page 40 and 41:
Agronomic science is central to imp
- Page 42 and 43:
Agronomic research in relation to f
- Page 44 and 45:
The discussion above identifies a n
- Page 46 and 47:
interventions and political inertia
- Page 48 and 49:
While research on producing food ha
- Page 50 and 51:
Box 1 Food system Activities and fo
- Page 52 and 53:
In addition to broadening the debat
- Page 54 and 55:
options. Examples already seen rang
- Page 56 and 57:
Figure 3 Outcomes for 10 variables
- Page 58 and 59:
Figure 4 Nine ‘planetary boundari
- Page 60 and 61:
Figure 5 Environmental change, food
- Page 62 and 63:
Table 1: Indicative analysis of the
- Page 65:
From Food Production to Food Securi
- Page 68 and 69:
Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the Eur
- Page 70 and 71:
Parry et al., 2005). Conducting foo
- Page 72 and 73:
is provided in the ESF/COST Forward
- Page 74 and 75:
Paper 5: Engaging Stakeholders at t
- Page 76 and 77:
into actions (strategies, policies,
- Page 78 and 79:
Box 2 Engaging with stakeholders in
- Page 80 and 81:
Box 3 Setting the research agenda f
- Page 82 and 83:
Third, and of considerable practica
- Page 84 and 85:
Figure 2: Organizing and understand
- Page 86 and 87: organizations made up of numerous n
- Page 88 and 89: Elements of good practice in stakeh
- Page 90 and 91: Finally, it is worth noting that fo
- Page 92 and 93: development (Lee, 1999; Gunderson a
- Page 94 and 95: Box 7 The GECAFS stakeholder survey
- Page 96 and 97: ‘break down’ what might be a hi
- Page 98 and 99: Paper 6: Undertaking Research at th
- Page 100 and 101: agriculture in many parts of the wo
- Page 102 and 103: gaps. The presence of a strong tech
- Page 104 and 105: an average of two years to coalesce
- Page 106 and 107: Institute for Meteorology and Hydro
- Page 108 and 109: Identifying case study sitesResearc
- Page 110 and 111: can both benefit from and contribut
- Page 112 and 113: Box 5 Mapping stakeholder interests
- Page 114 and 115: Holding planning meetings in locati
- Page 116 and 117: This reorientation of the debate fr
- Page 118 and 119: Importance of this type of research
- Page 120 and 121: Integrating the food system concept
- Page 122 and 123: awareness of the GEC issues within
- Page 124 and 125: pollutants were then introduced as
- Page 126 and 127: communities operating in food syste
- Page 128 and 129: Improving input-use efficiency acro
- Page 130 and 131: governance focuses on the range of
- Page 132 and 133: Developing research agendas in supp
- Page 134 and 135: The renewed approach to interdiscip
- Page 138 and 139: EAKIN, H. 2010. What is Vulnerable?
- Page 140 and 141: GODFRAY, H. C. J., BEDDINGTON, J. R
- Page 142 and 143: INGRAM, J. S. I. & FERNANDES, E. C.
- Page 144 and 145: LYUTSE, S. 2010. The One Billion To
- Page 146 and 147: RAYNER, S. & MALONE, E. L. 1998. Hu
- Page 148 and 149: UNDP 2006. The 2006 Human Developme
- Page 150 and 151: activities “from plough to plate
- Page 152 and 153: contribution to the science agenda:
- Page 154 and 155: urgently needed, and - given the gr
- Page 156 and 157: GECAFS plannenmakerij stelde vast d
- Page 158 and 159: ieder hun eigen groep van betrokken
- Page 160 and 161: het gebied van beheer hebben betrek
- Page 162: Curriculum VitaeFollowing a BSc in