GODFRAY, H. C. J., BEDDINGTON, J. R., CRUTE, I. R., HADDAD, L., LAWRENCE, D., MUIR,J. F., PRETTY, J., ROBINSON, S., THOMAS, S. M. & TOULMIN, C. 2010a. <strong>Food</strong> security:feeding the world in 2050 - Theme Issue September 2010. Philosophical Transactions of theRoyal Society B, 365.GODFRAY, H. C. J., BEDDINGTON, J. R., CRUTE, I. R., HADDAD, L., LAWRENCE, D., MUIR,J. F., PRETTY, J., ROBINSON, S., THOMAS, S. M. & TOULMIN, C. 2010b. <strong>Food</strong><strong>Security</strong>: The Challenge of Feeding 9 Billion People. Science, 327, 812-818.GRACE, P. R., JAIN, M. C., HARRINGTON, L. & ROBERTSON, G. P. 2003. The longtermsustainability of tropical and subtropical rice and wheat systems: an environmentalperspective. In: LADHA, J. K. (ed.) Special Issue on Improving the Productivity andSustainability of Rice–Wheat Systems: Issues and Impacts. Madison, USA: Crop ScienceSociety of America, Soil Science Society of America.GRACE, P. R., JAIN, M. C. & HARRINGTON, L. W. <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Environmental</strong> Impacts fromConservation Agriculture. Proceedings of the International Workshop on “ConservationAgriculture for <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Security</strong> and Environment Protection in Rice-Wheat CroppingSystems”, 6-9 February 2001 2001 Lahore, Pakistan.GREENLAND, D. G., GREGORY, P. J. & NYE, P. H. 1998. Land resources and con¬straints <strong>to</strong> cropproduction. In: WATERLOW, J. C., ARMSTRONG, D.G.,FOWDEN, L., RILEY, R. (ed.)Feeding a World Population of More than Eight Billion People: A Challenge <strong>to</strong> Science.Oxford: Oxford University Press.GREGORY, P. J., BRKLACICH, M., INGRAM, J. S. I. & WHELPDALE, D. 1992. <strong>Global</strong><strong>Environmental</strong> Change and <strong>Food</strong> Provision: A New Role for Science. Science for SustainableDevelopment ICSU.GREGORY, P. J. & INGRAM, J. S. I. 2000. <strong>Global</strong> change and food and forest production: futurescientific challenges. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 82, 3-14.GREGORY, P. J., INGRAM, J. S. I., ANDERSSON, R., BETTS, R. A., BROVKIN, V., CHASE, T.N., GRACE, P. R., GRAY, A. J., HAMILTON, N., HARDY, T. B., HOWDEN, S. M.,JENKINS, A., MEYBECK, M., OLSSON, M., ORTIZ-MONASTERIO, I., PALM, C. A.,PAYN, T. W., RUMMUKAINEN, M., SCHULZE, R. E., THIEM, M., VALENTIN, C. &WILKINSON, M. J. 2002. <strong>Environmental</strong> consequences of alternative practices forintensifying crop production. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 88, 279-290.GREGORY, P. J., INGRAM, J. S. I. & BRKLACICH, M. 2005. Climate change and food security.Phillosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 360, 2139-2148.GREGORY, P. J., JOHNSON, S. N., NEWTON, A. C. & INGRAM, J. S. I. 2009. Integrating pestsand pathogens in<strong>to</strong> the climate change/food security debate. J. Exp. Bot., 60, 2827-2838.GREGORY, P. J., JSI INGRAM, J GOUDRIAAN, T HUNT, J LANDSBERG, S LINDER, MSTAFFORD SMITH, R SUTHERST & C VALENTIN 1999. Managed <strong>Production</strong> Systems.In: WALKER BH, WL STEFFEN, J CANADELL & JSI INGRAM (eds.) The terrestrialbiosphere and global change: implications for natural and managed ecosystems. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.GREGRICH, R. J. 2003. A note <strong>to</strong> researchers: communicating science <strong>to</strong> policy makers andpractitioners. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 25, 233-237.GRIEVINK, J. W. The changing face of the global food industry. OECD conference on changingdimensions of the food economy: exploring the policy issues, 6 February 2003 2003 TheHague.GROOT, J. C. J., ROSSING, W. A. H., JELLEMA, A., STOBBELAAR, D. J., RENTING, H. &VAN ITTERSUM, M. K. 2007. Exploring multi-scale trade-offs between natureconservation, agricultural profits and landscape quality--A methodology <strong>to</strong> supportdiscussions on land-use perspectives. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 120, 58-69.130
GUNDERSON, L. H. & HOLLING, C. S. (eds.) 2002. Panarchy: Understanding transformations inHuman and Natural Systems, Washing<strong>to</strong>n and London.: Island Press.HADLEY CENTRE 2006. Effects of Climate Change in the Developing Countries. UK Met Office.HAGGAR, J., AYALA, A., DÍAZ, B. & REYES, C. U. 2001. Participa<strong>to</strong>ry Design of AgroforestrySystems: Developing Farmer Participa<strong>to</strong>ry Research Methods in Mexico. Development inPractice, 11, 417-424HARWOOD, J. Europe’s Green Revolution: Peasant-Oriented Plant-Breeding in Central Europe,1890-1945. International Society for the His<strong>to</strong>ry, Philosophy, and Social Studies of Biology,2005 Guelph.HAZELL, P. 2009. The Asian Green Revolution. IFPRI Discussion Papers.HENRICHS, T. 2006. On the Role of Scenarios in GECAFS Decision-Support. GECAFS WorkingPaper 4. Wallingford.HENRICHS, T., ZUREK, M., EICKHOUT, B., KOK, K., RAUDSEPP-HEARNE, C., RIBEIRO, T.,VAN VUUREN, D. & VOLKERY, A. 2010. Scenario Development and Analysis forForward-looking Ecosystem Assessments. In: ASH, N., BLANCO, H., BROWN, C.,GARCIA, K., HENRICHS, T., LUCAS, N., RAUDSEPP-HEARNE, C., R DAVIDSIMPSON, SCHOLES, R., TOMICH, T., VIRA, B. & ZUREK, M. (eds.) Ecosystems andHuman Well-being - A Manual for Assessment Practitioners. Island PressHETTNE, B. & SÖDERBAUM, F. 2000. Theorising the Rise of Regionness. New Political Economy,5, 457-472.HEYMAN, S. J. 2000. Health and social policy. In: BERKMAN, L. F. & KAWACHI, I. (eds.) SocialEpidemiology. New York Oxford University Press.HIREL, B., LE GOUIS, J., NEY, B. & GALLAIS, A. 2007. The challenge of improving nitrogen useefficiency in crop plants: <strong>to</strong>wards a more central role for genetic variability and quantitativegenetics within integrated approaches. Journal of Experimental Botany, 58, 2369-2387.HOLMES, J., BAMMER, G., YOUNG, J., SAXL, M. & STEWART, B. 2010. The Science-PolicyInterface. In: INGRAM, J., ERICKSEN, P. & LIVERMAN, D. (eds.) <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Security</strong> and<strong>Global</strong> <strong>Environmental</strong> Change. London: Earthscan.HOLMES, J. & CLARK, R. 2008. Enhancing the use of science in environmental policy making andregulation. <strong>Environmental</strong> Science and Policy, 11, 702-711.HOLMES, J. & SAVGARD, J. 2008. Dissemination and implementation of environmental research.Report 5681. S<strong>to</strong>ckholm: Swedish <strong>Environmental</strong> Protection Agency.HSIAO, T., STEDUTO, P. & FERERES, E. 2007. A systematic and quantitative approach <strong>to</strong> improvewater use efficiency in agriculture. Irrigation Science, 25, 209-231.HULME, M., DOHERTY, R., NGARA, T., NEW, M. & LISTER, D. 2001. Africa climate change1900–2100. Climate Res. , 17, 145-168.INGRAM, J. & BRKLACICH, M. 2006. <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Environmental</strong> Change and <strong>Food</strong> Systems. In:KRAFFT, E. E. A. T. (ed.) Earth System Science in the Anthroposcene. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.INGRAM, J. S. I. 2009. <strong>Food</strong> system concepts. In: RABBINGE, R. & LINNEMAN, A. (eds.)ESF/COST Forward Look on European <strong>Food</strong> Systems in a Changing World. Strasbourg:European Science Foundation.INGRAM, J. S. I. 2011. A <strong>Food</strong> Systems Approach <strong>to</strong> Researching <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Security</strong> and its Interactionswith <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Environmental</strong> Change. <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Security</strong>, submitted.INGRAM, J. S. I. & BRKLACICH, M. 2002. <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Environmental</strong> Change and <strong>Food</strong> Systems(GECAFS). A new, interdisciplinary research project. Die Erde, 113, 427-435.INGRAM, J. S. I., ERICKSEN, P. & LIVERMAN, D. (eds.) 2010. <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Security</strong> and <strong>Global</strong><strong>Environmental</strong> Change, London: Earthscan.131
- Page 1 and 2:
From Food Production to Food Securi
- Page 3 and 4:
From Food Production to Food Securi
- Page 5 and 6:
Table of ContentsAbstract .........
- Page 7 and 8:
Paper 6: Undertaking Research at th
- Page 9:
AbstractFood security is a conditio
- Page 12 and 13:
2010 about 925 million people had t
- Page 14 and 15:
water) are used, and reduce negativ
- Page 16 and 17:
While the flow of the argument abou
- Page 18 and 19:
determine interactions along and be
- Page 20 and 21:
Paper 3: A Food Systems Approach to
- Page 23:
From Food Production to Food Securi
- Page 26 and 27:
concerns and are now issues that mu
- Page 28 and 29:
the relationships between GEC and f
- Page 30 and 31:
Theme 2 aims to understand how comm
- Page 32 and 33:
GEC and the Food System of the Indo
- Page 34 and 35:
Paper 2: The role of agronomic rese
- Page 36 and 37:
These advances have resulted from a
- Page 38 and 39:
Crop selection to determine mechani
- Page 40 and 41:
Agronomic science is central to imp
- Page 42 and 43:
Agronomic research in relation to f
- Page 44 and 45:
The discussion above identifies a n
- Page 46 and 47:
interventions and political inertia
- Page 48 and 49:
While research on producing food ha
- Page 50 and 51:
Box 1 Food system Activities and fo
- Page 52 and 53:
In addition to broadening the debat
- Page 54 and 55:
options. Examples already seen rang
- Page 56 and 57:
Figure 3 Outcomes for 10 variables
- Page 58 and 59:
Figure 4 Nine ‘planetary boundari
- Page 60 and 61:
Figure 5 Environmental change, food
- Page 62 and 63:
Table 1: Indicative analysis of the
- Page 65:
From Food Production to Food Securi
- Page 68 and 69:
Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the Eur
- Page 70 and 71:
Parry et al., 2005). Conducting foo
- Page 72 and 73:
is provided in the ESF/COST Forward
- Page 74 and 75:
Paper 5: Engaging Stakeholders at t
- Page 76 and 77:
into actions (strategies, policies,
- Page 78 and 79:
Box 2 Engaging with stakeholders in
- Page 80 and 81:
Box 3 Setting the research agenda f
- Page 82 and 83:
Third, and of considerable practica
- Page 84 and 85:
Figure 2: Organizing and understand
- Page 86 and 87:
organizations made up of numerous n
- Page 88 and 89:
Elements of good practice in stakeh
- Page 90 and 91: Finally, it is worth noting that fo
- Page 92 and 93: development (Lee, 1999; Gunderson a
- Page 94 and 95: Box 7 The GECAFS stakeholder survey
- Page 96 and 97: ‘break down’ what might be a hi
- Page 98 and 99: Paper 6: Undertaking Research at th
- Page 100 and 101: agriculture in many parts of the wo
- Page 102 and 103: gaps. The presence of a strong tech
- Page 104 and 105: an average of two years to coalesce
- Page 106 and 107: Institute for Meteorology and Hydro
- Page 108 and 109: Identifying case study sitesResearc
- Page 110 and 111: can both benefit from and contribut
- Page 112 and 113: Box 5 Mapping stakeholder interests
- Page 114 and 115: Holding planning meetings in locati
- Page 116 and 117: This reorientation of the debate fr
- Page 118 and 119: Importance of this type of research
- Page 120 and 121: Integrating the food system concept
- Page 122 and 123: awareness of the GEC issues within
- Page 124 and 125: pollutants were then introduced as
- Page 126 and 127: communities operating in food syste
- Page 128 and 129: Improving input-use efficiency acro
- Page 130 and 131: governance focuses on the range of
- Page 132 and 133: Developing research agendas in supp
- Page 134 and 135: The renewed approach to interdiscip
- Page 136 and 137: BIELAK, A., HOLMES, J., SAVGÅRD, J
- Page 138 and 139: EAKIN, H. 2010. What is Vulnerable?
- Page 142 and 143: INGRAM, J. S. I. & FERNANDES, E. C.
- Page 144 and 145: LYUTSE, S. 2010. The One Billion To
- Page 146 and 147: RAYNER, S. & MALONE, E. L. 1998. Hu
- Page 148 and 149: UNDP 2006. The 2006 Human Developme
- Page 150 and 151: activities “from plough to plate
- Page 152 and 153: contribution to the science agenda:
- Page 154 and 155: urgently needed, and - given the gr
- Page 156 and 157: GECAFS plannenmakerij stelde vast d
- Page 158 and 159: ieder hun eigen groep van betrokken
- Page 160 and 161: het gebied van beheer hebben betrek
- Page 162: Curriculum VitaeFollowing a BSc in