INGRAM, J. S. I. & FERNANDES, E. C. M. 2001. Managing carbon sequestration in soils: conceptsand terminology. Agriculture,Ecosystems & Environment, 87, 111-117.INGRAM, J. S. I., GREGORY, P. J. & BRKLACICH, M. 2005. GECAFS Science Plan andImplementation Strategy. ESSP Report Series.INGRAM, J. S. I., GREGORY, P. J. & IZAC, A.-M. 2008. The role of agronomic research in climatechange and food security policy. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment,, 126, 4-12.INGRAM, J. S. I. & IZAC, A.-M. 2010. Undertaking Research at the Regional Level. In: INGRAM,J., ERICKSEN, P. & LIVERMAN, D. (eds.) <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Security</strong> and <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Environmental</strong>Change. London: Earthscan.INGRAM, J. S. I., STONE, J., CONFALONIERI, U., GARVIN, T., JUTRO, P. R., KLINK, C. A.,LUCKMAN, B. H., NOELLEMEYER, E. & MANN DE TOLEDO, P. 2007a. Delivering<strong>Global</strong> <strong>Environmental</strong> Change Science <strong>to</strong> the Policy Process. IAI-SCOPE Synthesis. In:TIESSEN, H., BRKLACICH, M., BREULMANN, G. & MENEZES, R. S. C. (eds.)Communicating <strong>Global</strong> Change Science <strong>to</strong> Society: An Assessment and Case Studies. IslandPress.INGRAM, J. S. I., W.L. STEFFEN & J. CANADELL 2007b. Envisioning Earth System Science forSocietal Needs: The development of Joint Projects and the Earth System Science Partnership(ESSP). GECAFS Working Paper 6. Oxford: GECAFS.INTERACADEMY COUNCIL 2004. Realizing the Promise and Potential fo African Agriculture.IPCC 2000. Special Report on Emissions Scenarios : a special report of Working Group III of theIntergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. New York IPCC.IPCC 2001. Africa. In: MCCARTHY, J. J., CANZIANI, O., LEARY, N.A., DOKKEN, D.J., WHITE,K.S. (Eds.) Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution ofWorking Group II <strong>to</strong> the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on ClimateChange. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.IPCC 2007. Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of WorkingGroup II <strong>to</strong> the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.In: PARRY, M., CANZIANI, O., PALUTIKOF, J., VAN DER LINDEN, P. & HANSON, C.(eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.IZAC, A.-M. N. & SANCHEZ, P. A. 2001. Towards a natural resources management paradigm forinternational agriculture: the example of agroforestry research. Agricultural Systems, 69, 5-25.JARVIS, A., LANE, A. & HIJMANS, R. J. 2008. The effect of climate change on crop wild relatives.Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 126, 13-23.JAT, M. J., PARVESH CHANDNA, RAJ GUPTA, S.K. SHARMA & M.A. GILL 2006. Laser LandLeveling: A Precursor Technology for Resource Conservation. Rice-Wheat ConsortiumTechnical Bulletin Series 7. New Delhi, India: Rice-Wheat Consortium for the Indo-GangeticPlains.JOHNSTON, J. 1984. Econometric Methods, New York, McGraw-Hill.JONES, A. & SEELIG, T. 2004. Understanding and Enhancing Research-Policy Linkages inAustralian Housing: A Discussion Paper. Queensland: Australian Housing and UrbanResearch Institute, Queensland Research Centre.JONES, P. G. & THORNTON, P. K. 2003. The potential impacts of climate change on maizeproduction in Africa and Latin American in 2055. <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Environmental</strong> Change, 13, 51-59.KARANJA, D. D. 1996. An Economic and Institutional Analysis of Maize Research in Kenya <strong>Food</strong><strong>Security</strong> International Development Working Papers. Michigan State University, Departmen<strong>to</strong>f Agricultural, <strong>Food</strong>, and Resource Economics.KELEPOURIS, T., KATERINA PRAMATARI & GEORGIOS DOUKIDIS 2007. RFID-enabledtraceability in the food supply chain. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 107, 183 - 200.132
KETTLEWELL, P. S., SOTHERN, R. B. & LOUKKARI, W. L. 1999. UK wheat quality andeconomic value are dependant on the North Atlantic oscillation. J. Cereal Sci. , 29, 205-209.KIKER, G. A. & LINKOV, I. 2006. The QnD Model/Game System: Integrating Questions andDecisions for Multiple Stressors. In: ARAPIS, G., GONCHAROVA, N. & BAVEYE, P.(eds.) Eco<strong>to</strong>xicology, Ecological Risk Assessment and Multiple Stressors. Amsterdam:Kluwer.KIKER, G. A., RIVERS-MOORE, N. A., KIKER, M. K. & LINKOV, I. 2005. QnD: A modelinggame system for integrating environmental processes and practical management decisions. In:MOREL, B. & LINKOV, I. (eds.) The Role of Risk Assessment in <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Security</strong> andEmergency Preparedness in the Mediterranean. Amsterdam: Kluwer.KOK, K., BIGGS, R. & ZUREK, M. 2007. Methods for developing multiscale participa<strong>to</strong>ryscenarios: insights from southern Africa and Europe. Ecology and Society, 13.KRISTJANSON, P., REID, R. S., DICKSON, N., CLARK, W. C., ROMNEY, D., PUSKUR, R.,MACMILLAN, S. & GRACE, D. 2009. Linking international agricultural researchknowledge with action for sustainable development. Proceedings of the National Academy ofSciences of the United States of America, 106, 5047-5052.KROPFF, M. J., BOUMA, J. & JONES, J. W. 2001. Systems approaches for the design of sustainableagro-ecosystems. Agricultural Systems, 70, 369-393.KROYER, G. T. 1995. Impact of food processing on the environment - an overview. Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft und-Technologie, 28, 547-552.KURUKULASURIYA, P. R., MENDELSOHN, R., HASSAN, R., BENHIN, J., DERESSA, T.,DIOP, M., EID, H., YERFI-FOSU, K., GBETIBOUO, G., JAIN, S., MAHAMADOU, A.,MANO, R., KABUBO-MARIARA, S., EL-MARSAFAWY, S., MOLUA, E., OUDA, S.,OUEDRAOGO, M., SÉNE, I., MADDISON, D., NIGGOL-SEO, S. & DINAR, A. 2006. WillAfrica Survive Climate Change? World Bank Economic Review, August 2006.LAL, P., LIM-APPLEGATE, H. & SCOCCIMARRO, M. 2001. The adaptive decision-makingprocess as a <strong>to</strong>ol for integrated natural resource management: focus, attitudes and approach.Conservation Ecology, 5.LEBEL, L., ANDERIES, J. M., CAMPBELL, B., FOLKE, C., HATFIELD-DODDS, S., HUGHES,T. P. & WILSON, J. 2006. Governance and the Capacity <strong>to</strong> Manage Resilience in RegionalSocial-Ecological Systems. Ecology and Society, 11.LEE, K. N. 1999. Appraising Adaptive Management. Conservation Ecology, 3.LIVERMAN, D., ERICKSEN, P. & INGRAM, J. S. I. 2009. Governing <strong>Food</strong> Systems in the Contex<strong>to</strong>f <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Environmental</strong> Change. IHDP UPDATE, 59-64.LIVERMAN, D. & INGRAM, J. 2010. Why Regions? In: INGRAM, J., ERICKSEN, P. &LIVERMAN, D. (eds.) <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Security</strong> and <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Environmental</strong> Change. London:Earthscan.LIVERMAN, D. & KAPADIA, K. 2010. <strong>Food</strong> Systems and the <strong>Global</strong> Environment: An Overview.In: INGRAM, J., ERICKSEN, P. & LIVERMAN, D. (eds.) <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Security</strong> and <strong>Global</strong><strong>Environmental</strong> Change. London: Earthscan.LOBELL, D. B., BURKE, M. B., TEBALDI, C., MASTRANDREA, M. D., FALCON, W. P. &NAYLOR, R. L. 2008. Prioritizing Climate Change Adaptation Needs for <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Security</strong> in2030. Science, 319, 607-610.LOBELL, D. B., SCHLENKER, W. & COSTA-ROBERTS, J. 2011. Climate Trends and <strong>Global</strong> Crop<strong>Production</strong> Since 1980. Science, 1.LWEC. 2009. Living With <strong>Environmental</strong> Change [Online]. Available: http://www.lwec.org.uk/[Accessed 27August 2009].133
- Page 1 and 2:
From Food Production to Food Securi
- Page 3 and 4:
From Food Production to Food Securi
- Page 5 and 6:
Table of ContentsAbstract .........
- Page 7 and 8:
Paper 6: Undertaking Research at th
- Page 9:
AbstractFood security is a conditio
- Page 12 and 13:
2010 about 925 million people had t
- Page 14 and 15:
water) are used, and reduce negativ
- Page 16 and 17:
While the flow of the argument abou
- Page 18 and 19:
determine interactions along and be
- Page 20 and 21:
Paper 3: A Food Systems Approach to
- Page 23:
From Food Production to Food Securi
- Page 26 and 27:
concerns and are now issues that mu
- Page 28 and 29:
the relationships between GEC and f
- Page 30 and 31:
Theme 2 aims to understand how comm
- Page 32 and 33:
GEC and the Food System of the Indo
- Page 34 and 35:
Paper 2: The role of agronomic rese
- Page 36 and 37:
These advances have resulted from a
- Page 38 and 39:
Crop selection to determine mechani
- Page 40 and 41:
Agronomic science is central to imp
- Page 42 and 43:
Agronomic research in relation to f
- Page 44 and 45:
The discussion above identifies a n
- Page 46 and 47:
interventions and political inertia
- Page 48 and 49:
While research on producing food ha
- Page 50 and 51:
Box 1 Food system Activities and fo
- Page 52 and 53:
In addition to broadening the debat
- Page 54 and 55:
options. Examples already seen rang
- Page 56 and 57:
Figure 3 Outcomes for 10 variables
- Page 58 and 59:
Figure 4 Nine ‘planetary boundari
- Page 60 and 61:
Figure 5 Environmental change, food
- Page 62 and 63:
Table 1: Indicative analysis of the
- Page 65:
From Food Production to Food Securi
- Page 68 and 69:
Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the Eur
- Page 70 and 71:
Parry et al., 2005). Conducting foo
- Page 72 and 73:
is provided in the ESF/COST Forward
- Page 74 and 75:
Paper 5: Engaging Stakeholders at t
- Page 76 and 77:
into actions (strategies, policies,
- Page 78 and 79:
Box 2 Engaging with stakeholders in
- Page 80 and 81:
Box 3 Setting the research agenda f
- Page 82 and 83:
Third, and of considerable practica
- Page 84 and 85:
Figure 2: Organizing and understand
- Page 86 and 87:
organizations made up of numerous n
- Page 88 and 89:
Elements of good practice in stakeh
- Page 90 and 91:
Finally, it is worth noting that fo
- Page 92 and 93: development (Lee, 1999; Gunderson a
- Page 94 and 95: Box 7 The GECAFS stakeholder survey
- Page 96 and 97: ‘break down’ what might be a hi
- Page 98 and 99: Paper 6: Undertaking Research at th
- Page 100 and 101: agriculture in many parts of the wo
- Page 102 and 103: gaps. The presence of a strong tech
- Page 104 and 105: an average of two years to coalesce
- Page 106 and 107: Institute for Meteorology and Hydro
- Page 108 and 109: Identifying case study sitesResearc
- Page 110 and 111: can both benefit from and contribut
- Page 112 and 113: Box 5 Mapping stakeholder interests
- Page 114 and 115: Holding planning meetings in locati
- Page 116 and 117: This reorientation of the debate fr
- Page 118 and 119: Importance of this type of research
- Page 120 and 121: Integrating the food system concept
- Page 122 and 123: awareness of the GEC issues within
- Page 124 and 125: pollutants were then introduced as
- Page 126 and 127: communities operating in food syste
- Page 128 and 129: Improving input-use efficiency acro
- Page 130 and 131: governance focuses on the range of
- Page 132 and 133: Developing research agendas in supp
- Page 134 and 135: The renewed approach to interdiscip
- Page 136 and 137: BIELAK, A., HOLMES, J., SAVGÅRD, J
- Page 138 and 139: EAKIN, H. 2010. What is Vulnerable?
- Page 140 and 141: GODFRAY, H. C. J., BEDDINGTON, J. R
- Page 144 and 145: LYUTSE, S. 2010. The One Billion To
- Page 146 and 147: RAYNER, S. & MALONE, E. L. 1998. Hu
- Page 148 and 149: UNDP 2006. The 2006 Human Developme
- Page 150 and 151: activities “from plough to plate
- Page 152 and 153: contribution to the science agenda:
- Page 154 and 155: urgently needed, and - given the gr
- Page 156 and 157: GECAFS plannenmakerij stelde vast d
- Page 158 and 159: ieder hun eigen groep van betrokken
- Page 160 and 161: het gebied van beheer hebben betrek
- Page 162: Curriculum VitaeFollowing a BSc in