RENA WG 4 Dec 2011 final assessment needs ... - Renanetwork.org

More documents

Recommendations

Info

The need for additional staff in most of the institutions involved in implementing the environmental acquisis laid out clearly in the NPI 2008 and in other documents. The level of increase identified as necessaryvaried between Ministries with MEMSP (excluding SEPA and Inspection) planned to increase by 179%,SEPA by 294% and Sector for Control and Surveillance by 20%, giving an overall increase for MEMSP of98% (168 staff).The amended National Programme for Integration of Republic of Serbia into European Union (NPI)from 24 December 2009 once again points out the demand for strengthening and developingadministrative capacities through staff education for performing the following tasks: inspection;monitoring (air, water, land and research); authorization of waste and chemicals management; assessmentof the impacts and accidents; nature conservation and protection; project management, especially on locallevel where there are not enough environmental conservation officers.Building and strengthening of the permits system include better cooperation between different permitsunits and further training of the stuff. This especially related to the permits which issuing has yet to befully applied in practice.Inception missionSerbia indicated to be interested in receiving info on Environmental Crime in line with its needsassessment report issues like management subjects like, planning, enforcement strategies and noncompliance response.Results QuestionnaireThe results are divided according the sub headings of the questionnaires:Management issues will be emphasized on planning prioritizing, strategies and feedback reporting issuesand inspection issues. The training needs have to be fully directed to permit implementation in practicewith site visits and monitoring. Sample taking is considered to be of less importance in the training.Summarising:The training programme has to focus on life inspections on an existing facility and its permit. This can beexecuted during an on site visit, coached by experienced inspectors (see common inspections frominception report). In the preparation of these practical training the subject of permit writing in the contextof the IPPC and IED is practiced and shown how they work. Exercise in Human resources calculationrequired for permit writing and inspection is clarified.The HIP-Elektroliza Petrohemija at Pancevo will be visited with emphasis on Chlorine production andmercury emissions.The special subject requested in the training is IED/IPPC and SOVESO IISuggested composition of the group (max 25) to be trained is as follows:- about 16 participants from the regions involved in industrial inspection and permitting activities as abalanced group.- 4 participants from the ministry of which 2 with knowledge of existing laws and regulations in forceand 2 with knowledge on managerial level in the policy directorate of the ministry.- 2 participants of the ministry that check permits of major industries prior to the issuance of the permit inthe regions.- 2 so called “common inspectors” from other countries with specific knowledge on this type factory tobe attending.Training schedule for 6-9 March 2012Training programmeDay 1: INTRO; INTERACTIONS REGULATORY CYCLE, MANAGEMENT OF INSPECTIONSand LATEST SOFTWARE; PRIORITY SETTING; REPORTING AND FEEDBACK; BASICS OF5
PERMITTING; EXERCISE IN HUMANRESOURCE MANAGEMENT for permitting andinspection; SPECIAL SUBJECTS (IED and IPPC)Day 2: IED(recent developments); DISCUSSION ON CONTENTS OF PERMIT APPLICATIONS;INTEGRATED PERMITTING (example pertro-chemical industry); STUDY ON THE BREFAND/OR BAT (applied at Chlorine production industry at HIP-Elektroliza Petrohemija Pancevo;RESENTATION ON FACILITY TO BE INSPECTED BY REPRESENTATIVE OF THEFACTORY; Exercise on mercury emission mass balance and validation of data); BASICS ONAPPROACH TO SITE VISITS; PLANNING OF THE VISIT IN GROUPS; PRESENTATION OFEXPERIENCE OF THE INVITED INSPECTORS.Day 3: EXECUTION PLANNED VISIT; PREPARATION OF REPORT ON RETURN;PRESENTATION OF RESULTS OF THE VISIT; FINAL CONCLUSION; ADVISE FORFOLLOW-UPDay 4: SPECIAL SUBJECT OF THE BENEFICIARY COUNTRY IPPC and IED; SEVESO II.OPEN DISCUSSION ON COOPERATION BETWEEN AUTHORITIESAttachment 1 Serbia questionnaireNeeds questionnaireTraining Area Topics Priority Ranking1 = urgent; 2 = very useful;3 = helpful; 4 = low interestManagementPlanning 1human resource management 2Budgeting 1Prioritizing inspections 1permitting priorities 3non compliance response 2enforcement strategies 1cooperation strategies 2feedback/reporting 1CommentsPermit issuingInspectionYour Suggestions(for specific trainings,and for regionaltrainings, including 2Directives/Regulations of main concern)permit structuresintegrated permittingenforceable conditionsmonitoring requirementsnegotiating skillsmonitoring conditionssite visits 1inspection planning 1reporting 1non compliance response 1investigating skills 1sample taking 4follow-up strategies 1feedback 1IEDSEVESO IIPetro chemicalindustry6
Page 2: Working Group 4 - ECENA - Activity
Page 8 and 9: MACEDONIA (Attachment 2 questionnai
Page 10 and 11: Management issuesThe selection made
Page 12 and 13: MONTENEGRO (Attachment 3 questionna
Page 14 and 15: InspectionThe suggestions made in t
Page 16 and 17: CROATIA (Attachment 4 questionnaire
Page 18: Attachment 4 CroatiaNeeds Questionn

RENA WG 4 Dec 2011 final assessment needs ... - Renanetwork.org

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?