global_zero_commission_on_nuclear_risk_reduction_report
global_zero_commission_on_nuclear_risk_reduction_report
global_zero_commission_on_nuclear_risk_reduction_report
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
GLOBAL ZERO COMMISSION ON NUCLEAR RISK REDUCTION REPORTDE-ALERTING AND STABILIZING THE WORLD’S NUCLEAR FORCE POSTURESpercent de-alerted, although China’s opaque <strong>nuclear</strong> postureleaves room for doubt. A small number of warheads may beforward deployed in a dismantled state at the six main landbasedmissile bases of the Chinese 2 nd Artillery, the central<strong>nuclear</strong> command organizati<strong>on</strong> of the Chinese People’s Liberati<strong>on</strong>Army (PLA).The time required to generate these forces to launch-readystatus is lengthy. Warheads would need to be transported byrail or road – or by air in emergencies – c<strong>on</strong>siderable distances(typically many hundreds of miles) to rendezvousand mate up with delivery systems at the main missile bases,at hidden locati<strong>on</strong>s near these bases (if mobile missileshad already been dispersed out of garris<strong>on</strong> during a crisis),at the main heavy bomber base at Dat<strong>on</strong>g, and at the mainsubmarine base at Qingdao. 16 Transportati<strong>on</strong> and uploadingwould take days to achieve an initial operati<strong>on</strong>al capabilityand weeks to complete the mating for the entire force of landmissiles, bombers and submarines.China thus runs minimal peacetime <strong>risk</strong>s of mistaken, hastyor unauthorized launches, accidents, weap<strong>on</strong>s falling intothe hands of terrorists during transportati<strong>on</strong>, or rapid escalati<strong>on</strong>to their deliberate use in a crisis. The surging of forcesto high combat readiness in a crisis would of course run significantlyhigher <strong>risk</strong>s. As a leading Western expert puts it:er, with warheads most vulnerable to theft oraccident during transportati<strong>on</strong>, the system’sreliance <strong>on</strong> mobility creates opportunities forincidents and terrorist acti<strong>on</strong>. 17China’s restraint may not last for l<strong>on</strong>g. It is deploying itsfirst strategic submarine as well as new land mobile rockets.China’s <strong>nuclear</strong> leadership may well want to improvethe survivability of these forces by putting them <strong>on</strong> higheralert, sending at least some of them out <strong>on</strong> patrol armedwith warheads, or at least pre-positi<strong>on</strong>ing <strong>nuclear</strong> payloadsat forward locati<strong>on</strong>s in peacetime (e.g., naval facilities nearsubmarine pens) to streamline the uploading of weap<strong>on</strong>s todelivery platforms in crisis circumstances.Marrying up warheads to land-mobile rockets or to strategicsubmarines presupposes high Chinese c<strong>on</strong>fidence intheir safeguards against unauthorized launch. It must bepresumed that China’s technological prowess in the areasof electr<strong>on</strong>ic locking devices and cryptology is sufficientlyadvanced that it could install strict if not fool-proof safeguards<strong>on</strong> the weap<strong>on</strong>s themselves (so-called “permissiveacti<strong>on</strong> links”) and <strong>on</strong> the delivery and command-c<strong>on</strong>trolsystems (so-called “coded switch devices”). Soviet strategicforces were mated up in the late 1960s after Soviet leadersgrew c<strong>on</strong>fident in the integrity of the technical safeguardsdevices installed <strong>on</strong> their forces. China can be expected tofollow this pattern. China’s forces in fact may be alreadyundergoing this transiti<strong>on</strong> to higher readiness under tightcentral command and c<strong>on</strong>trol. Given that centralizati<strong>on</strong> isa hallmark of its political culture, China’s nati<strong>on</strong>al leadershipand its General Staff will presumably retain the keysto the kingdom – the authorizati<strong>on</strong> and unlock codes, andperhaps the target coordinates – until a launch decisi<strong>on</strong> hasbeen made at the pinnacle of nati<strong>on</strong>al command. If the centralizedRussian system is any guide to Chinese thinking<strong>on</strong> the questi<strong>on</strong> of <strong>nuclear</strong> command and c<strong>on</strong>trol, launchauthority will not be pre-delegated very far down the chainof command. (By c<strong>on</strong>trast, the United States took the <strong>risk</strong>of decentralizing and pre-delegating a great deal of launchA preliminary examinati<strong>on</strong> of China’s <strong>nuclear</strong>warhead storage and handling system indicatesthat Beijing takes security and safetyseriously. With the bulk of its <strong>nuclear</strong> warheadstockpile nestled deep in secure mountainpalaces, the 22 Base’s physical protecti<strong>on</strong>system appears to be founded up<strong>on</strong> morethan “guns, gates, and guards.” In fact, indefending against real and perceived threats,Taibai may be <strong>on</strong>e of the most secure warheadstockpile facilities in the world. Howevproject2049.net/half_lives_china_<strong>nuclear</strong>_warhead_program.pdf.16 See Li Bin’s discussi<strong>on</strong> of mobile missile operati<strong>on</strong>s in “TrackingChinese Strategic Mobile Missiles,” Science and Global Security, Vol.15,2007, pp.1-30.17 Stokes, China’s Nuclear Warhead Storage and Handling System, op.cit., p. 11.22