12.07.2015 Views

Economic Impacts of Parks, Rivers, Trails and Greenways

Economic Impacts of Parks, Rivers, Trails and Greenways

Economic Impacts of Parks, Rivers, Trails and Greenways

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

incurred for maintenance <strong>of</strong> developed park l<strong>and</strong>. Areas that were "l<strong>and</strong>scaped,"containing turf, shrubs <strong>and</strong> maintained trees, were considered as were"hardscape" areas including roads, parking lots, trails, building pads, <strong>and</strong>structures. The average maintenance cost per acre among the four agenciessurveyed was $4,236 as shown below (American River Parkway, 2000).Table 2.Benchmark Maintenance ComparisonDeveloped Natural BudgetArea Area ($/yr)(acres) (acres)Cost/Dev.(Acre/yr)Facility/AgencyMission Bay Park, San Diego 977 5 $ 3,778,168 $ 3,867City <strong>of</strong> Sacramento 1,154 1,000 $ 5,485,500 $ 4,753City <strong>of</strong> Encinitas 54 69 $ 373,550 $ 6,918East Bay Reg. Park District 6,370 84,630 $ 26,600,000 $ 4,176Total 8,555 85,704 $ 36,237,218 $ 4,236Average 2,139 21,426 $ 9,059,305 $ 4,236A similar analysis looked at the California State <strong>Parks</strong>’ historic costs <strong>of</strong>managing the 7.5 miles <strong>of</strong> the American River Parkway that are under itsjurisdiction, include hiking <strong>and</strong> riding trails, beaches, <strong>and</strong> day use picnic areas.The number <strong>of</strong> ranger patrol <strong>and</strong> lifeguard hours incurred on that part <strong>of</strong> theparkway during a given year under their historical staffing plan is 9,375. Whencombined with the boat rescue lifeguard position, <strong>and</strong> divided by 1,800productive hours/position per year, the result is 6.2 full-time positions for 7.5miles <strong>of</strong> parkway or 0.83 full-time positions per mile <strong>of</strong> parkway (AmericanRiver Parkway, 2000).Expenditures must be reviewed in detail to determine how much is spent locally since somesupplies may be purchased from outside the region <strong>and</strong> only the pr<strong>of</strong>it from retail sales, forinstance, actually benefits the local retailer. The majority <strong>of</strong> the purchase price covers thewholesale cost <strong>of</strong> the product. Also, agency expenditures are <strong>of</strong>ten funded by communityresidents in the form <strong>of</strong> local taxes. This is actually an opportunity cost because residentswould probably have spent that money in the community if it had not been collected in theform <strong>of</strong> taxes, so there is no generation <strong>of</strong> extra income by agency expenditures. If,however, resources are injected into an economy from non-local governments, they can beconsidered new money because they would not have come to the community without thepark or trail. Thus, carefully consider what portion <strong>of</strong> agency expenditures should beincluded in a particular economic impact analysis because a portion could possibly havebeen spent on alternative projects within the area. The East Bay Regional <strong>Parks</strong> District (EBRPD) in California spends about $80million annually, including $59 million on operations <strong>and</strong> maintenance <strong>and</strong>about $21 million on capital expenditures. A total <strong>of</strong> 540 permanent employees<strong>and</strong> 215 seasonals work for the District. The majority <strong>of</strong> the funding spent byEBRPD results from local taxes, but funds are also received from outsidesources such as charges for services paid by non-residents, <strong>and</strong> state <strong>and</strong> federal10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!