Assurance de qualité pour le cancer rectal – phase 2 ...
Assurance de qualité pour le cancer rectal – phase 2 ...
Assurance de qualité pour le cancer rectal – phase 2 ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
KCE Reports 81 PROCARE <strong>–</strong> <strong>phase</strong> 2 143Figure 53. Algorithm for QI 1252 (prospective database).Gra<strong>de</strong> 4 complicationsAll patientsN=10,02%N=1071c-Stage IVN=111Gra<strong>de</strong> 3 complicationsN=1ChemotherapyStage?Chemotherapy?N=68Gra<strong>de</strong> severeadverse eventsduring chemo?Gra<strong>de</strong> complications:MISSINGN=5c-Stage 0-I-II-IIIN=625No chemotherapyNo complicationsORcomplications=MISSINGN=61N=43c-Stage UnknownN=335RATE OF CURATIVELY TREATED PATIENTS THAT RECEIVED ACOLONOSCOPY WITHIN 1 YEAR AFTER TREATMENTMeasurement in prospective PROCARE databasePatients un<strong>de</strong>rgoing R0 resection are se<strong>le</strong>cted using variab<strong>le</strong> ‘SG_V216’ (subco<strong>de</strong> 1).However, no co<strong>de</strong> is availab<strong>le</strong> for colonoscopy in the follow-up section.Measurement in coup<strong>le</strong>d administrative databaseAlthough administrative co<strong>de</strong>s exist for colonoscopy (Tab<strong>le</strong> 74 and 75) and radicalresection (Tab<strong>le</strong> 64 and 66), no co<strong>de</strong> exists for R0 resection. This QI is therefore notmeasurab<strong>le</strong> for the administrative cohort.RATE OF PATIENTS UNDERGOING REGULAR FOLLOW-UP(ACCORDING TO THE PROCARE RECOMMENDATIONS)Measurement in prospective PROCARE databasePatients un<strong>de</strong>rgoing R0 resection are se<strong>le</strong>cted using variab<strong>le</strong> ‘SG_V216’ (subco<strong>de</strong> 1).However, no co<strong>de</strong> is availab<strong>le</strong> for colonoscopy in the follow-up section.Measurement in coup<strong>le</strong>d administrative databaseAlthough administrative co<strong>de</strong>s exist for diagnostic procedures (Tab<strong>le</strong> 62, 63, 73, 74, 75,78, 79 and 80) and radical resection (Tab<strong>le</strong> 64 and Tab<strong>le</strong> 66), no co<strong>de</strong> exists for R0resection. This QI is therefore not measurab<strong>le</strong> for the administrative cohort.