Assurance de qualité pour le cancer rectal – phase 2 ...
Assurance de qualité pour le cancer rectal – phase 2 ...
Assurance de qualité pour le cancer rectal – phase 2 ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
KCE Reports 81 PROCARE <strong>–</strong> <strong>phase</strong> 2 53Finally, for 19 of the 54 patients treated with adjuvant chemo(radio)therapy, informationwas lacking on the chemotherapy regimen (total missings: 473/1071, 44%).This QI is measurab<strong>le</strong> for 12 centres using the prospective database. Ten centres have ascore of 100%. Ten centres have a score above the weighted (94%; 95%CI 86 <strong>–</strong> 100%)and unweighted mean (94%; 95%CI 86 <strong>–</strong> 100%). The range of inclu<strong>de</strong>d eligib<strong>le</strong> patients is1 <strong>–</strong> 7 per centre.Again, since no administrative co<strong>de</strong> is availab<strong>le</strong> for R0 resection, this QI is notmeasurab<strong>le</strong> for the administrative cohort. However, when consi<strong>de</strong>ring all patients thatun<strong>de</strong>rwent surgery (i.e. not exclusively those with an R0 resection), 99% of the(y)pStage II-III patients that were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy received 5-FUbased adjuvant treatment.Tab<strong>le</strong> 43. Number of patients with R0 resection treated with adjuvantchemo(radio)therapy containing 5-FU, measured with prospectivePROCARE data.(y)pStageI II III II-IIIPatients with <strong>rectal</strong> <strong>cancer</strong> 246 273 296 569Patients with R0 resection and information on adjuvant treatment 112 127 105 232Patients with chemo(radio)therapy and regimen known9 15 20 35(<strong>de</strong>nominator)Patients with 5-FU regimen (numerator) 8 14 19 33 (94%)Rate of acute gra<strong>de</strong> 4 chemotherapy-related complicationsDEFINITIONNumerator: all patients with (y)pStage 0-III RC that un<strong>de</strong>rwent surgery and receivedadjuvant chemotherapy (with or without radiotherapy), and with acute gra<strong>de</strong> 4chemotherapy-related complications.Denominator: all patients with (y)pStage 0-III RC that un<strong>de</strong>rwent surgery and receivedadjuvant chemotherapy (with or without radiotherapy).Exclusion:• patients with (y)pStage IV• (y)pStage 0-III patients without surgery• (y)pStage 0-III patients that didn’t receive adjuvant chemo(radio)therapyRESULTSNo acute gra<strong>de</strong> 4 chemotherapy-related complications were i<strong>de</strong>ntified for the (y)pStage0-III patients treated with adjuvant chemo(radio)therapy (Tab<strong>le</strong> 44). As for the previousQI on adjuvant treatment, a high number of missings was i<strong>de</strong>ntified. For 181 patients the(y)pStage was unknown. For 426 of the 841 (y)pStage 0-III patients un<strong>de</strong>rgoing surgery,no information was availab<strong>le</strong> on adjuvant treatment. Above this, 9 of the 68 patientsreceiving adjuvant chemo(radio)therapy had a complication, but no information wasavailab<strong>le</strong> on the gra<strong>de</strong> of the complication. For 12 other of these 68 patients, nochemotherapy-related information was availab<strong>le</strong> at all. Finally, the number of missingdata for complications cannot be calculated, since the <strong>de</strong>fault value of the variab<strong>le</strong> is ‘0’(i.e. missing data also receive a value ‘0’). Therefore, the total number of missing data isat <strong>le</strong>ast 628/1071 or 59%.Since no patient with a gra<strong>de</strong> 4 complication was i<strong>de</strong>ntified, a per-centre-analysis isirre<strong>le</strong>vant.Due to the absence of a specific co<strong>de</strong> for gra<strong>de</strong> 4 chemotherapy-related complications,this QI is not measurab<strong>le</strong> in the administrative cohort.