12.07.2015 Views

Assurance de qualité pour le cancer rectal – phase 2 ...

Assurance de qualité pour le cancer rectal – phase 2 ...

Assurance de qualité pour le cancer rectal – phase 2 ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

KCE Reports 81 PROCARE <strong>–</strong> <strong>phase</strong> 2 53Finally, for 19 of the 54 patients treated with adjuvant chemo(radio)therapy, informationwas lacking on the chemotherapy regimen (total missings: 473/1071, 44%).This QI is measurab<strong>le</strong> for 12 centres using the prospective database. Ten centres have ascore of 100%. Ten centres have a score above the weighted (94%; 95%CI 86 <strong>–</strong> 100%)and unweighted mean (94%; 95%CI 86 <strong>–</strong> 100%). The range of inclu<strong>de</strong>d eligib<strong>le</strong> patients is1 <strong>–</strong> 7 per centre.Again, since no administrative co<strong>de</strong> is availab<strong>le</strong> for R0 resection, this QI is notmeasurab<strong>le</strong> for the administrative cohort. However, when consi<strong>de</strong>ring all patients thatun<strong>de</strong>rwent surgery (i.e. not exclusively those with an R0 resection), 99% of the(y)pStage II-III patients that were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy received 5-FUbased adjuvant treatment.Tab<strong>le</strong> 43. Number of patients with R0 resection treated with adjuvantchemo(radio)therapy containing 5-FU, measured with prospectivePROCARE data.(y)pStageI II III II-IIIPatients with <strong>rectal</strong> <strong>cancer</strong> 246 273 296 569Patients with R0 resection and information on adjuvant treatment 112 127 105 232Patients with chemo(radio)therapy and regimen known9 15 20 35(<strong>de</strong>nominator)Patients with 5-FU regimen (numerator) 8 14 19 33 (94%)Rate of acute gra<strong>de</strong> 4 chemotherapy-related complicationsDEFINITIONNumerator: all patients with (y)pStage 0-III RC that un<strong>de</strong>rwent surgery and receivedadjuvant chemotherapy (with or without radiotherapy), and with acute gra<strong>de</strong> 4chemotherapy-related complications.Denominator: all patients with (y)pStage 0-III RC that un<strong>de</strong>rwent surgery and receivedadjuvant chemotherapy (with or without radiotherapy).Exclusion:• patients with (y)pStage IV• (y)pStage 0-III patients without surgery• (y)pStage 0-III patients that didn’t receive adjuvant chemo(radio)therapyRESULTSNo acute gra<strong>de</strong> 4 chemotherapy-related complications were i<strong>de</strong>ntified for the (y)pStage0-III patients treated with adjuvant chemo(radio)therapy (Tab<strong>le</strong> 44). As for the previousQI on adjuvant treatment, a high number of missings was i<strong>de</strong>ntified. For 181 patients the(y)pStage was unknown. For 426 of the 841 (y)pStage 0-III patients un<strong>de</strong>rgoing surgery,no information was availab<strong>le</strong> on adjuvant treatment. Above this, 9 of the 68 patientsreceiving adjuvant chemo(radio)therapy had a complication, but no information wasavailab<strong>le</strong> on the gra<strong>de</strong> of the complication. For 12 other of these 68 patients, nochemotherapy-related information was availab<strong>le</strong> at all. Finally, the number of missingdata for complications cannot be calculated, since the <strong>de</strong>fault value of the variab<strong>le</strong> is ‘0’(i.e. missing data also receive a value ‘0’). Therefore, the total number of missing data isat <strong>le</strong>ast 628/1071 or 59%.Since no patient with a gra<strong>de</strong> 4 complication was i<strong>de</strong>ntified, a per-centre-analysis isirre<strong>le</strong>vant.Due to the absence of a specific co<strong>de</strong> for gra<strong>de</strong> 4 chemotherapy-related complications,this QI is not measurab<strong>le</strong> in the administrative cohort.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!